Transcript
A (0:00)
They'll keep you company, they'll keep you sane on a long bike ride or a slow workday making bed and wax about a playoff race whose bats hard. It's Effectively Wild. So stick around, you'll be well beguiled. Hello and welcome to episode 2356 of Effectively Wild, a FanGraphs baseball podcast brought to you by our Patreon supporters. I'm Meg Riley of fangraphs and I am joined by Venlim.
B (0:56)
Almost. Almost made it. Made it about halfway through the name. Actually, more than halfway. Halfway through the last name.
A (1:03)
Ben Lindberg.
B (1:06)
That's it.
A (1:07)
How are you, Ben?
B (1:08)
How are you? Which I was going to ask before that minor introductory stumble there. Yeah, you've been busy. You just shepherded, what, 20 something posts to publication in the past day or so?
A (1:22)
Well, I would be wildly remiss if I claimed shepherding as if I were the only shepherd.
B (1:29)
Yeah. Doesn't preclude other shepherds being involved.
A (1:32)
Oh, yeah. We must, we must thank Matt Martell among. Among the shepherds. He's, he's, you know, really the other shepherd, at least on the fan graph side. Let's see, we published 19 things yesterday and then 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. As we are recording right now, Matt's shepherding a seventh. Davey just filed an eighth. And we're also going to have a prospect ranking post that'll go live probably sometime tonight or tomorrow morning. So it's a lot of sheep as it were.
B (2:15)
Transformed you into count, fan count. It sounds like we're here on a Friday afternoon. You're perhaps a little extra loopy. And yet we have a trade deadline debrief to do a trade deadline digest, dissection, other words that start with D. It was. It was a deadline. It was not a deadline mid Meg. It was. Oh, see, I called you Med. See, we.
A (2:40)
And what's your excuse? Did you even write on the deadline, Ben? You didn't even write on the deadline.
B (2:46)
We'll get our names down eventually. Another 2300 something episodes, but there you go. It was busy. That is indisputable. It was eventful. I think there are two schools of thought on this trade deadline. Two possible interpretations. So one is that this was active. This was wild. This was super exciting. This exceeded every expectation. And unquestionably, there were a lot of trades. And Jake and Jordan over at Tespas family barbecue, their count was 36 trades. I don't know if they did that in the countdown count voice, but 36 trades on deadline day. And that was just On. On the final day itself. 52 over the final two days, they declared this a record, a new record for trades. And so that's one interpretation. Wow, this deadline just blew our expectations out of the water. We thought it was going to be sort of slower, inconsequential, and. And wow, were we wrong. The other interpretation was that a lot happened, but not that much of consequence, that there were many trades but few impact, that this was sound and fury signifying something, but not that much in the grand scheme of things. I'd say Dan Simborski initially struck this tone. He put on Blue Sky. I'm running the numbers now, but I suspect that when the zip simulations are done, this will project as one of the lower impact trade deadlines in recent memory in terms of the bottom line, probability changes.
