
Elon Musk BRUTALLY Honest Interview LEAVES Audience Speechless #ElonMusk Source: https://youtu.be/mwLKAHSE0tQ?si=5QFWlhapN_ofQWEp Elon Musk is the CEO of the company X, Tesla, Neuralink, SpaceX and the Boring Company. Follow me on X...
Loading summary
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
This podcast is sponsored by Talkspace. Last year I went through many different life changes. I needed to take a pause and examine how I was feeling in the inside to better show up for the ones who need me to be my best version of myself. When you're navigating life's changes, Talkspace can help. Talkspace is the number one rated online therapy, bringing you professional support from licensed therapists and psychiatry providers that you can access anytime, anywhere. Living a busy life, navigating a long distance relationship, becoming a first stepfather, Talkspace made all of those journeys possible. I could speak with my therapist in the office. I could speak with my therapist in the comfort of my home. I was never alone. Talkspace works with most major insurers and most insured members have a $0 copay. No insurance, no problem. Now get $80 off your first month with promo code SPACE80 when you go to talkspace.com match with a licensed therapist today at talkspace.com save $80 with code SPACE80 at talk.
Grainger Commercial Announcer
If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H Vac and plumbing supplies to lighting and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Granger for the ones who get it done.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Latest interview of Elon Musk Bill Gates said, there is no one in our time who has done more to push the bounds of science innovation than you. Well, it's kind of say, well that's nice thing to have anyone say about you. Nice coming from Bill Gates, but oddly enough when it comes to AI, actually for around a decade you've almost been doing the opposite and saying, hang on, you need to think about what we're doing and what we're pushing here and what do we do to make this safe and, and maybe we shouldn't be pushing as faster, as hard as we are. Like, I mean you've been doing it for a decade. Like what was it that caused you to think about it that way? And you know, why do we need to be worried?
Demis Hassabis
Yeah, I've been somewhat of a Cassandra for quite a while where people would, I would tell you, like we should really be concerned about AI. They'd be like, what are you talking about? Like, I've never really had any experience with, with it, but since I was immersed in technology, I have been immersed in technology for a long time. I could see it coming. So. But I think this year was there have been a number of breakthroughs. I mean, you know, the point at which someone can see a dynamically created video of themselves. You know, like somebody can make a video of you saying anything in real time or me. And so there's sort of the deep fake videos, which are really incredibly good. In fact, sometimes more convincing than real ones. And deep real. And then Obviously things like ChatGPT were quite remarkable. Now I saw GPT1 GPT2 GPT3 GPT4, you know, the whole sort of lead up to that. So it was easy for me to kind of see where it's going. If you just sort of extrapolate the points on a curve and assume that trend will continue, then we will have profound artificial intelligence and obviously at a level that far exceeds human intelligence. So glad to see at this point that people are taking safety seriously. And I'd like to say thank you for holding this AI safety conference. I think actually it will go down in history as being very important. I think it's really quite profound. And, and I do think overall that the potential is there for artificial intelligence AI to have most likely a positive effect and to create a future of abundance where there is no scarcity of goods and services. But it is somewhat of the magic genie problem, where if you have a magic genie that can grant all the wishes, usually those stories don't end well. Be careful what you wish for, including wishes.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
So you talked a little bit about the summit and thank you for being engaged in it, which has been great and people enjoyed having you there filling in this dialogue. Now, one of the things that we achieved today in the meetings between the companies and the leaders was an agreement that externally, ideally, governments should be doing safety testing of models before they're released. I think this is something that you've spoken about a little bit. It was something we worked really hard on because my job in government is to say, hang on, there is a potential risk. Not a definite risk, but a potential risk of something that could be bad. Yeah. My job is to protect the country. And we can only do that if we develop the capability we need in our Safety Institute and then go in and make sure we can test the models before they are released. Delighted that happened today. But, you know, what's your view on what we should be doing? Right, You've talked about the potential risk, Right? Again, we don't know. But, you know, what are the types of things governments like ours should be doing to manage and mitigate against those risks.
Demis Hassabis
Well, I generally think that it is good for government to play a role when the public safety is at risk. So, you know, really, for the vast majority of software, the public safety is not at risk. If the app crashes on your phone or a laptop, it's not a massive catastrophe. But when you're talking about digital superintelligence, I think, which does pose a risk to the public, then there is a role for government to play to safeguard the interests of the public. And this is, of course, true in many fields. You know, aviation, cars. You know, I deal with regulators throughout the world because of Starlink being communications, rockets being aerospace, and cars being vehicle transport. So I'm very familiar with dealing with regulators and I actually agree with the vast majority of regulations. There's a few that I disagree with from time to time, but 0.1%, probably well less than 1% of regulations I disagree with. So there is some concern from people in Silicon Valley who've never dealt with regulators before, and they think that this is going to just crush innovation and slow them down and be annoying. But. And it will be annoying. It's true. They're not wrong about that. But I think there's. We've learned over the years that having a referee is a good thing. And if you look at any sports game, there's always a referee. And nobody's suggesting, I think, to have a sports game without one. And I think that's the right way to think about this, is for govern to be a referee, to make sure the sportsmanlike conduct and that the public safety is, you know, is addressed, that we care about public safety, because I think there might be at times too much optimism about technology. And I speak, I say that as a technologist. I mean, so I ought to know. And, and like, on balance, I think that I will be a force for good, most likely, but the probability of it going bad is not zero percent.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Yeah.
Demis Hassabis
So we just need to mitigate the downside potential.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
And then how you talk about referee and that's what we're talking about. Yeah. Well, there we go. I mean, you know, and we talk about this and Demis and I discussed this a long time ago and like,
Demis Hassabis
literally facing right at him.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
And actually, you know, Demis, to his credit and the credit of people in the industry, did say that to us. It's not right that Dennis and his colleagues are marking their own homework. Right. There needs to be someone independent, and that's why we've developed the Safety Institute here. Do you think governments can develop the expertise? One of the things we need to do is say, hang on, you know, Dennis, Sam, all the others have got a lot of very smart people doing this. Governments need to quickly tool up, capability wise, personnel wise, which is what we're doing. I mean, do you think it is possible for governments to do that fast enough given how quickly the technology is developing, or what do we need to do to make sure we do it quick enough?
Demis Hassabis
No, I think it's a great point you're making. The pace of AI is faster than any technology I've seen in history by far. And it's, it seems to be growing in capability by at least five fold, perhaps tenfold per year. It'll certainly grow by an order of magnitude next year. Yeah, so, so, and government isn't used to moving at that speed. But I think even if there are not firm regulations, even if there's not, even if there isn't an enforcement capability, simply having insight and being able to highlight concerns to the public will be very powerful. So even if that's all that's accomplished, I think that will be very good.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Okay. Yeah. Well, hopefully we can do better than that.
Demis Hassabis
Hopefully, yeah, yeah.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
No, but that's how far we were talking before it was striking. You know, you're someone who spent their life in technology living Moore's Law. And what was interesting over the last couple of days talking to everyone who's doing the development of this, and I think you concur with this, is just the pace of advancement here is unlike anything all of you have seen in your careers in technology. Is that fair? Because you've got these kind of compounding effects from the hardware and the data and the personnel.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah, I mean the two currently the two leading centers for AI development are the San Francisco Bay area and the sort of London area. And there are many other places where it's being done, but those are the two leading areas. So I think if, you know, if the United States and the UK and China are sort of aligned on, on safety, that's all going to be a thing. That's really, that's where, that's where the leadership is generally.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
You actually, it's interesting you mentioned China that, so I took a decision to invite China to summit over the last very good days and it was not an easy decision. A lot of people criticize me for it. You know, my view is if you're going to try essential serious conversation, you need to. But what would your thoughts? You do business all around the world. You just talked about it there.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Should we be engaging with them? Can we trust them? Is that the right thing to have done?
Demis Hassabis
If we don't. If China is not on board with AI safety, it's somewhat of a moot situation. The single biggest objection that I get to any kind of AI regulation or sort of safety controls are, well, China's not going to do it and therefore they will just jump into the lead and exceed us all. But actually China is willing to be participate in safety and thank you for inviting them. And they, you know, I think we should thank China for attending. When I was in China earlier this year, my main subject of discussion with the leadership in China was AI safety and saying that this is really something that they should care about and they took it seriously. And, and, and you are too, which is great. And having them here, I think was essential, really. If they're not participants, it's pointless.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
It's pointless. Yeah. No, that and I think we were pleased. I mean, they were engaged yesterday in the discussions and actually ended up signing the same communique that everyone else did. That's great. Which is a good start. Right. And as we need everyone to approach us in a similar way, if we're going to have, I think, a realistic chance of resolving it, I was going to. You talked about innovation earlier and regulation being annoying.
VRBoCare Commercial Announcer
When you manage procurement for multiple facilities, every order matters. But when it's for a hospital system, they matter even more. Grainger gets it and knows there's no time for managing multiple suppliers and no room for shipping delays. That's why Grainger offers millions of products in fast, dependable delivery, so you can keep your facility stocked, safe and running smoothly. Call 1-800-GRAINGER Click grainger. Com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done.
Grainger Commercial Announcer
If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H vac and plumbing supplies to lighting and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
There was a good debate today we had about open source and I think you've kind of been a proponent of algorithmic transparency and making some of the X algorithms public. And actually we were talking about Geoffrey Hinton on the way in. He's particularly been very concerned about open source. Models being used by bad actors. You've got a group of people who say they are critical to innovation happening in that distributed way. Look, it's a trick. There's probably no perfect answer. And there is a tricky balance. What are your thoughts on how we should approach this open source question or where should we be targeting whatever regulatory or monitoring that we're going to do?
Demis Hassabis
Well? Well, the open source algorithms and data tend to lag the closed source by 6 to 12, but given the rate of improvement that there's actually therefore quite a big difference between the closed source and the open. If things are improving by a factor of, let's say five or more, then being a year behind is, you're five times worse. So it's a pretty big difference. And that might be actually an okay situation, but it certainly will get to the point where you've got open source AI that can do that will start to approach human level intelligence or perhaps exceed it. I don't know quite what to do about it. I think it's somewhat inevitable that there'll be some amount of open source and I guess I would have a slight bias towards open source because at least you can see what's going on, whereas closed source, you don't know what's going on. Now, it should be said with AI that even if it's open source, do you actually know what's going on? Because if you've got a gigantic data file and you know sort of billions of weights and parameters, you can't just read it and see what it's going to do. It's a gigantic file of inscrutable numbers. You can test it when you run it. You can test it, you can run a bunch of tests to see what it's going to do. But it's probabilistic as opposed to deterministic. It's not like traditional programming where you've got a. You've got very discrete logic and the outcome is very predictable and you can read each line and see what each line is going to do. A neural net is just a whole bunch of probabilities. I mean, it sort of ends up being a giant comma separated value file. It's like our digital God is a CSV file really? Okay, that is kind of what it is.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Yeah. Now that point you've just made is one that we have been talking about a lot because again, conversations, the people are developing, the technology make. The point that you've just made it is not like normal software where there's predictability about inputs improving, leading to this particular output improving. And as the models iterate and improve, we don't quite know what's going to come out the other end, I think would agree with that, which is why I think there is this bias that look, we need to get in there while the training runs a bit being done before the models are released to understand what is this new iteration brought about in terms of capability, which it sounds like you would agree with, I was going to shift gears a little bit. You've talked a lot about human consciousness, human agency, which actually might strike people as strange given that you are known for being such a brilliant innovator and technologist. But it's quite heartfelt when I hear you talk about it and the importance of maintaining that agency in technology and preserving human consciousness. Now it kind of links to the thing I was going to ask is when I do interviews or talk to people out and about in this job about AI, the thing that comes up most actually is probably not so much the stuff we've been talking about, but jobs. It's what does AI mean for my job? Is it going to mean that I don't have a job or my kids are not going to have a job? Now answer as a, as a policymaker, as a leader is actually AI is already creating jobs. And you can see that in the companies that are starting. Also, the way it's being used is a little bit more as a co pilot necessarily versus replacing the person. There's still human agency, but it's helping you do your job better, which is a good thing. And as we've seen with technological revolutions in the past, clearly there's change in the labor market, the amount of jobs. I was quoting an MIT study today that they did a couple of years ago. Something like 60% of the jobs at that moment didn't exist 40 years ago. So hard to predict. And my job is to create an incredible education system system, whether it's at school, whether it's retraining people at any point in their career, because ultimately if we've got a skilled population, they'll be able to keep up with the pace of change and have a good life. But you know that it's still a concern. And you know, what would your kind of observation be on, on AI and the impact on labor markets and people's jobs and how they should feel about that as they think about this?
Demis Hassabis
Well, I think we are seeing the most disruptive force in history here, you know, where we have, for the first time, we will have the first time something that is smarter than the smartest human. And that, I mean, it's hard to say exactly what that moment is. But there will come a point where no job is needed. You can have a job if you want to have a job for sort of personal satisfaction, but the AI will be able to do everything. So I don't know if that makes people comfortable, uncomfortable, you know, that's why I say if you, if you wish for a magic genie that gives you any wishes you want and there's no limit. You don't have those three limits through wish limit nonsense. You just have as many wishes as you want. So it's both good and bad. One of the challenges in the future will be how do we find meaning in life if you have a magic genie that can do everything you want. I do think we. It's hard, you know, when there's new technology, it tends to have usually follow an S curve. In this case, we're going to be on the exponential portion of the S curve for a long time and we have to ask for anything. We won't have universal basic income, we'll have universal high income. So in some sense it'll be somewhat of a leveler or an equalizer because really I think everyone will have access to this magic genie and you'll be able to ask any question. It'll certainly be good for education. It'll be the best tutor you could and the most patient tutor. So they're all there. And there will be no shortage of goods and services. We'll be an age of abundance. I think if I'd recommend people read in banks. The banks culture books are probably the best envisioning. In fact, not probably. They're definitely by far the best envisioning of an AI future. Nothing even close. So I'd recommend, really recommend banks. I'm a very big fan. All his books are good. Doesn't say which one. All of them. So. So that's that. That'll give you a sense of what is a. I guess a fairly utopian protopian future with. With AI.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Yeah. Which is good. From a. As you said, it's a universal high income, which is a nice phrase. And that's. It's good from a kind of materialistic sense age of abundance. Actually. That then leads to the question that you pose, right. I'm somebody who believes, you know, work gives you meaning. Right. I think a lot about that as leader. I think work is a good thing, you know, you know, gives people purpose in their lives. And if you then remove a large chunk of that, you know, what does that mean? And where do you get that, you know, where do you get that drive, that motivation, that purpose? I mean, you're talking about it. You, you work a lot of hours. I do, you know.
Demis Hassabis
No, I. As I was mentioning when we were talking earlier, I have to somewhat engage in deliberate suspension of disbelief because I'm putting so much blood, sweat and tears into a work project and burning the, you know, 3am oil. Then I'm like, wait, why am I doing this? I can just wait for the AI to do it. I'm just lashing myself for no reason. Must be a glutton for punishment called demos.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
And tell them to hurry up and then you can have a holiday. Right. That's the plan. Yeah. No, it's a. Look, it's a tricky. It's a tricky thing because I think, you know, part of our job is to make sure that we can navigate to that very, I think, largely positive places and help people through it between now and then. Because these things bring a lot about change in the labor market, as we've seen.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah. I think it probably is generally a good thing because, you know, there are a lot of jobs that are uncomfortable or dangerous or sort of tedious and the computer will have no problem doing that. Be happy to do that all day long. So, you know, it's fun to cook food, but it's not that fun to wash the dishes. But the computer's perfectly happy to wash dishes. I guess there is, you know, we still have a sports like where, where humans compete and like the Olympics and obviously a machine can, can go faster than any human. But we still have, we still, humans race against each other and, and have all, you know, have these sports competitions against each other where even though the machines are better, they're still, I guess, competing to see who can be the best human at something. And people do find fulfillment in that. So I guess that's perhaps a good example of how even when machines are faster than us, stronger than us, we
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
still find a way, we still enjoy
Demis Hassabis
competing against other humans to at least see who's the best human.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
That's a good, that's a good analogy. And we've been talking a lot about managing the risks. Just before we move on, I would finish on AI to talk a little bit about the opportunities, you know, you're engaged in lots of different companies, neuro being an obvious one, which is doing some exciting stuff. You touched on the thing that I'm probably most excited about, which is in education.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
And I think Many people will have seen Salk's video from earlier this year. His TED Talk about. As you talked about, it's like personal tutor.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah, personal tutor. An amazing personal tutor.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
An amazing personal tutor. And we know the difference in learning. Having that personalized tutor is incredible compared to classroom learning. You can have every child have a personal tutor specifically for them. That then just evolves with them over time. Could be extraordinary. And so that, you know, for me, I look at that, I think, gosh, that is within reach at this point. And that's one of the benefits I'm most excited about. When you look at the landscape of things that you see as possible, what is it that you are particularly excited about?
Demis Hassabis
I think certainly AI tutors are going to be amazing. Perhaps already are. I think there's also perhaps companionship, which may seem odd because how can the computer really be your friend? But if you have an AI that has memory and remembers all of your interactions and has read every. You can say, like, give it permission to read everything you've ever done, so really will know you better than anyone, perhaps even yourself, and where you can talk to it every day and those conversations build upon each other. You will actually have a great friend as long as that friend can stay your friend and not get turned off or something. Don't turn off my friends. But I think that will actually be a real thing. And one of my sons sort of has some learning disabilities and has trouble making friends, actually. And I was like, well, you know, hey, friend would actually be great for him.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Okay. You know, that was a surprising answer, but that's actually worth reflecting on. So it's really interesting. We're already seeing it actually, as we deliver, you know, psychotherapy anyway now doing far more by digitally and by telephone to people. And it's making a huge difference. And you can see a world in which actually, you know, AI can provide that social benefit to people. Just a quick question on X and then we should open it up to everybody. You made a change when you wanted many changes, but one. One of. One of the changes.
Demis Hassabis
Love that letter.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Yeah.
Demis Hassabis
Real thing about it, you really do, really do.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
One of the change which, you know, kind of, you know, goes into the space that, you know, we have to operate in. And this balance between free speech and moderation is, you know, we grapple with, as politicians, you were grappling with your own version of that and you moved away from a kind of manual, human way of doing it, the moderation to the community. And. Yeah, and I think it was an interest change Right. It's not what everyone else has done. It would be good, you know, what's, what was the reasoning behind that and why do you think that is a better way to do that?
Demis Hassabis
Yeah, part of the problem is if you, if you empower people as sensors, then, well, there's going to be some amount of bias that they have and then whoever appoints the censors is effectively in control of information. So then the idea behind Community Notes is, well, how do we have a consensus driven, I mean it's not really censoring it, but consensus driven approach to truth? How do we, or how do we make things the least amount untrue? You can say like one can't perhaps get to pure truth, but you can aspire to be more truthful. So the thing about Community Notes is it doesn't actually delete anything, it simply adds context. Now that context could be this thing is untrue for the following reasons. But importantly, with Community Notes, everything is open source actually. So you can see the software, every line of the software, you can see all of the data that went into a Community Note and you can independently create that Community Note. So if you've got, if you see manipulation of the data, you can actually highlight that and say, well, there appears to be some gaming of the system and you can suggest improvements. So it's maximum transparency, which is I
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
think combined with the kind of wisdom of the crowds and trying to get to a better answer.
Demis Hassabis
And really one of the key elements of Community Notes is that in order for a note to be shown, people who have historically disagreed must agree. And there is a bit of AI usage here. So there's populated parameter space around each contributor to the Community Notes and then parameter space. So, so everyone's got basically these vectors associated with them which, so it's not as simple as, as right or left. It's saying it's more, it's several hundred vectors that, that because things are more complicated than something right or left. And, and then we'll, we'll do sort of inverse correlation, say like, okay, these people generally disagree, but they agree about this note.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Okay, so then that, so then that,
Demis Hassabis
that, that gives the note credibility. Okay, yeah, that's, that's the core of it and it's working quite well. Yeah, I've yet to see a note actually be present for more than a few hours. That, that is incorrect. So the batting average is extremely good. And when I ask, people say, oh, they're worried about Community Notes sort of being disinformation. I'll like Send me one and then they can't. So, so I think it's, I think it's quite good. I mean the general aspiration is with the X platform is to inform and entertain the public and to be as accurate as possible and as truthful as possible. Even if someone doesn't like the truth, you know, people don't always like the truth at all. But that's the aspiration. And I think if we stay true to the truth, then I think we'll find that people use the system to learn what is going on and to. I think actually truth pays. So I think it'll be. Well, I mean, assuming you don't want to engage in self delusion, then I think it's the smart move.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Excellent, very helpful. Right, let's open it up to all our guests here. We've got some microphones, they'll come here and find you. We got. Yes, go for it.
VRBoCare Commercial Announcer
Support is available 247 with VRBoCare. We're here day or night, ready whenever you need help because a great trip starts with the right support.
Grainger Commercial Announcer
If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H vac and plumbing supplies to lighting and more. And all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Thank you. Good evening. Alice Bentinck from Entrepreneur First. Thank you for a fascinating conversation. I suppose a question for each of you. Prime Minister, the UK has some of the best universities in the world. We have the talent. What will it take for the UK
VRBoCare Commercial Announcer
to be a real breeding ground?
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Unicorn companies? Being a founder in the UK is
Demis Hassabis
still a non obvious career choice for
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
the most exceptional technical talent. What are the cultural elements that we
VRBoCare Commercial Announcer
need to put into place to change this? Thank you.
Demis Hassabis
You want to go first?
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Go for it. Sure.
Demis Hassabis
Well, you're right that there are cultural elements where the culture should celebrate creating new companies and there should be a bias towards supporting small companies because the ones that need nurturing, the larger companies really don't need nurturing. So just you can think of it sort of like a garden. If it's a little sprout, it needs nurturing. If it's a mighty oak, it doesn't need quite as much. So I think that is a mindset change that is important. But I should mention that London is, you know, London and San Francisco or the Bay Area are really the two centers for AI. So that, so London is actually doing very well on that front. The two. I said the two leading locations on earth. You know, San Francisco's probably ahead of London, but London's really very strong. But London area, greater London, home counties, I guess. So I'm just saying objectively this is the case. But you do need that. You need the infrastructure. You need landlords who are willing to rent to new companies. You need law firms and accountants that are willing to support new companies. And it's generally a mind, it is a mindset change. And I think some of that is happening, but I think really it's just culturally people need to decide this is a good thing.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Yeah, yeah, no, actually, well, thanks for what you said about the uk. It's something that we work hard on. Lots of people in the room are part of what makes this a fabulous place for innovative companies, including Alice. So, Alice, what I'd say is my job is to get all the nuts and bolts right, make sure that all of you starting companies can raise the capital that you need. Everything from your seed funding with our incredible EIS tax reliefs all the way through to your late stage rounds. And we need reform of our pension funds. And the Chancellor's got a bunch of incredible reforms to unlock capital from all the people who have it and deploy it into growth equity. Right. That is a work in progress. We're not there yet, but I think we're making good progress. We need talent, we need people. So that means an education system that prioritizes the things that matter. And you've seen my reforms. I go on about more maths, more maths, more maths, but I think that is important, but also attracting the best and the brightest here. If you look at our fastest growing companies in this country, and I think it's probably the same in the us, over half of them have a non British founder. Right. And so that tells you we've got to be a place that is open to the world's best and brightest entrepreneurial talent. So the visa regime that we've put in place, I think does that makes it easy for those people to come here? And then actually it's the thing that we spent the beginning of the session talking about the regulation, right. Making sure that we've got a regulatory system that's pro innovation, that. Yeah, we've, of course we always need guardrails on the things that will worry us, but we've got to Create a space for people to innovate and do different things. Now those are all my jobs. The thing that is tougher is the thing that Elon talked about which is culture. Right. It's how do you transpose that culture from places like Silicon Valley across the world where people are unafraid to give up the security of a regular paycheck to go and start something and be comfortable with failure. You talk about that a lot. I think you talked about it more in when you were playing games. Right. But that you've got to be comfortable failing and knowing that that's just part of the process. And that is a, it's a tricky cultural thing to do overnight but it's an important part of I think creating that kind of environment.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah. If you don't succeed with your first startup, it shouldn't be a sort of a catastrophic career ending.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Exactly.
Demis Hassabis
Thing. It should be, you know, well good. I think it generally should like, should be like well you know, you gave it a good shot, you know, and now try again.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Exactly.
Demis Hassabis
So one thing I was going to mention is like obviously creating a company is sort of a high risk, high reward situation. But I don't know quite what the, how it works in the uk. I think it's probably better than continental Europe but I'm not sure how it is in the UK but if somebody's basically going to risk their life savings and with. And the vast majority of startups fail. So I mean you hear about the startups that succeed but most companies are, most startups consist of, you know, a massive amount of work followed by failure. That's actually most companies. And so it's a high risk, high reward. And so the high reward part does need to be there for it to make sense.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
I think that was a very soft pitch for a tax policy that I mean but actually I can tell you. So I agree. And we have, so we have I think relative to certainly European countries, But certainly the U.S. definitely California, a much lower rate of capital gains tax. Right. So for those people who are risking and growing something like we think the reward should be there at the end. So 20% capital gains tax rate and on stock options. I don't know if we've got anyone from Index Ventures in the room. So Index, one of our leading VC funds here, they do a regular report looking at most countries tax treatment of stock options. And you know, when I was Chancellor, Treasury Secretary equivalent, you know we were I think down at. We were pretty good but we were fourth or fifth and I said we need to for exactly the reason that you mentioned, like this has got to be the best place renovators. We need to move that up. And I think in the last iteration of that report we had, because of the changes that Jeremy and I had made, we have moved up to I think second from memory. So hopefully that should give you and everyone else some comfort that we recognize that's important because when people work hard and risk things. Yeah. They should be able to enjoy the rewards of it.
Demis Hassabis
High risk, high reward.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Yeah. And I think we have a. We very much have a tax system that supports that and those are the values that I believe in and I think most of us in this room probably do as well. Right, next, next question. I've got Seb in front of me and then I'll come over here. Go on Seb, thanks very much. We've talked about some really big ideas, global changing ideas. I'm really interested particularly in the context of creation of science and technology, super hubs and so on. How does that map onto the everyday lives of people living in say Austin, Texas to Jews aren't around you more. In my case, Nottingham, East Midlands. What is. How do you see that evolving for people, you know, every day?
Demis Hassabis
The sort of everyday effects of AI?
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
For context, Elon says Seb runs our equivalent of cvs. Right. Or Walgreens. So you know, when I visited. Right. So he's got millions of people coming in his shops every day and it's making sure. How do we make this relevant? I think Seb is your question, how is this relevant to that person? You know, maybe actually let me go, I'll go first on that because I think it's a fair point. I was just going over with the team a couple of things that we, we're doing because I was thinking how are we doing AI right now that is making a difference to people's lives. And we have this thing called gov, which is. Which actually when we, when it happened several years ago was a pioneering thing. All the government information together on one website. And so you need to get a driving license, passport, any interaction with government, it was centralized in a very easy, relatively easy to use, way better than most. So we're about to deploy AI across that platform. So that is something that I think think several million people a day use. Right. So a large chunk of the population is interacting with Gov UK every single day to do all these day to day tasks.
Demis Hassabis
Right.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Every one of your customers is doing all those things. And so we're about to deploy AI into that to make that whole process so much easier because, you know, some people will be like, look, well I'm currently here and I've lost my passport and my flight's in five hours. At the moment that would require, you know, how many steps to figure out what you do. You know, actually when we deploy the AI, it should be that you could just literally say that and boom, this is what we're going to do, walk you through it. And that's going to benefit millions and millions of people every single day. Right. Because that's a very practical way in my seat that I can start using this technology to help people in their day to day lives. Not just health care discoveries and everything else that we're also doing. But I thought that's quite a powerful demonstration of literally your day to day customer seeing actually their just day to day life get a little bit easier because of something that Elon Demis and others in this room have helped create.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah, no, exactly. The most immediate thing is just being able to ask, like having a very smart friend that you can ask anything. You know, ask how to make something, how to solve any problem and it'll tell you so. And obviously companies are going to adopt this, so I think you'll have much better customer service. I guess essentially that'll probably be the first thing you notice. And then we talked about education. So having a tutor. So if you're trying to understand a subject, like having a phenomenal tutor on any subject that's really pretty much there already, almost. I mean, we need to, obviously AI needs to stop hallucinating before, you know, it can't give you. I mean, we still have a little bit of the problem where it can give you an answer that's confidently wrong with great grammar, bullet points and everything in citations. It was not real, so it has to be okay. We need to make sure it's not. It's not giving you confidently wrong tutor answers, but that's going to happen pretty quickly where it is actually correct.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
I was going to say for any parent who was homeschooling and realizing what their kids needed to be helped with, that will come as an enormous relief, I think. Very good. Right, have we got, let's go questions over here. Who have we got? We only need microphones or. Brent, are you there? Perfect. Hi, Brent Herbman. So you've spoken eloquently about abundance in the Age of Abundance. So it feels obviously with AI it's everything everywhere all at once. But with robots and to get the Age of Abundance need a lot of robots. I know you're working on robots as well. Are there sort of constraints that we should think of and our politicians should
Demis Hassabis
be thinking of that we might get?
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
One country might get heavily behind in robots that can do all these things and enter the age of abundance and therefore be at a strategic disadvantage?
Demis Hassabis
Well, really, anything that can be actuated by a computer is effectively a robot. So you can think of, frankly, Tesla cars are robots on wheels. Anything that's connected to the Internet is effectively an endpoint actuator for artificial intelligence. So you've got Boston Dynamics, obviously they've been making impressive robots for a while.
Grainger Commercial Announcer
If you work in university maintenance, Grainger considers you an MVP because your playbook ensures your arena is always ready for tip off. And Grainger is your trusted partner, offering the products you need all in one place, from H Vac and plumbing supplies to lighting and more, and all delivered with plenty of time left on the clock. So your team always gets the win. Call 1-800-GRAINGER visit grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done.
VRBoCare Commercial Announcer
When you manage procurement for multiple facilities, every order matters, but when it's for a hospital system, they matter even more. Grainger gets it and knows there's no time for managing multiple suppliers and no room for shipping delays. That's why Grainger offers millions of products in fast, dependable delivery, so you can keep your facility stocked, safe and running smoothly. Call 1-800-GRAINGER Click grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done.
Demis Hassabis
I think they're at this point mostly owned by Hyundai. So I guess Hyundai's probably going to make robots that are humanoid and some rather interesting shapes that I wasn't anticipating. Like the one that looks like has wheels and looks sort of like a kangaroo on wheels. I'm not sure what that is, but looks a little demented, frankly. But there's going to be all sorts of robots. You've got the company Dyson, in which I think there's some pretty impressive things. And I think the UK will not be behind actually on that front. UK also has arm, which is really the best, one of the best, perhaps the best in chip design in the world. Tesla uses a lot of ARM technology. Almost everyone does, actually. So I think the UK is in a strong position. Germany obviously makes a lot of robots, industrial robots. I mean, I think generally countries that make robots of any kind, even if they seem somewhat conventional, will be fine. I do think there is a safety concern, especially with humanoid robots, because at least the Car can't chase you into this building, not very easily, or chase you up a tree, or you can sort of run up a flight of stairs and get away from a Tesla. I think there's a Stephen King movie about that. If your car gets possessed. But if you have a humanoid robot, it can basically chase you anywhere. So I think we should have some kind of hardwired local cutoff that you can't update from the Internet. So anything that can be software updated from the Internet obviously can be overridden. But if you have a local sort of off switch where you perhaps say a keyword or something, and then that puts the robot into a safe state, some kind of localized safe state ability, an off switch, you know, where you don't have to get too close to the robot. I don't know. So we've got millions of these things going all over the place.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
You're not selling it just, you know.
Demis Hassabis
I know. I'm saying it's something we should be quite concerned about because Robert can follow you anywhere. Then, you know, what if they just one day get a software update and they're not so friendly anymore? We've got a James Cameron movie on our heads.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
It's actually that's. It's funny you say that because in our session that we had today, you know, just with a who, they made exactly the same point. Right. And so we're talking about. They talk about movies, actually, without mentioning James Cameron. They're talking about James Cameron movies. They're saying, if you think about it, it's not just those movies, but any of these movies. Trains, subways, metros. They said all these movies with the same plot fundamentally all end with the person turning it off. Right. Or finding a way to shut the thing down. And they were making the same point that you are about the importance of actual physical off switches. Yeah. So all the technology is great, but fundamentally this same movie is played out 50 times. We've all watched it. And all fundamentally, you know. You know, point I'm referring to.
Demis Hassabis
Right.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
It all ends in pretty much the same way with someone finding their way to just.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah, do.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Which is kind of interesting that you said a similar point.
Demis Hassabis
Right.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
It's not the. It's not the obvious place you'd go
Demis Hassabis
to, but maybe that could be one of the tests for the AI. We should say, like Blank is your favorite James Cameron movie. Fill in the blank.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Yeah. Excellent. Right? Yes, we got over there. Yep. Perfect. Hi. Question for you both. So I'm a founder of a AI and ML Scale up In the third center for AI, which is Leeds in the north of England. A bit biased since the launch of ChatGPT three months after that, we saw a real increase in phishing attacks using much more sophisticated language patterns. What do we do to protect businesses, consumers, so they trust this technology better and how do we bring them along
VRBoCare Commercial Announcer
that journey with us?
Demis Hassabis
Well, I think we shouldn't trust it that much actually. It is actually quite, quite a significant challenge because we're getting to the point where even open source AI can pass human capture tests. So you know, this is, are you a human? Identify all the traffic lights in this picture. You're like, okay, AI is going to have no problem doing that. In fact, it'll do it better than a human and faster than a human. So we're like, how do you know at the point at which it's a better human, better passing human tests than humans, then, well, what tests actually make sense? That is a real problem. I don't actually have a good solution to it. One of the things we're trying to figure out on the X platform is how to deal with that, because we really are at the point where even with open source, readily available AI, you don't need to be sort of leading the field. You can actually be better than humans at passing these tests. And that's sort of why we think, well, perhaps we should sort of charge a dollar or a pound a year. It's a very tiny amount of money, but it's, it still makes it prohibitively expensive to make a million bots. So, and especially if you need a million payment methods, then you run out of sort of stolen credit cards pretty quickly. So that, that's, that's sort of where we're thinking like we might have to sort of just charge some very tiny amount of money, 0.3 cents a day effectively to deal with the onslaught of AI powered bots. And that is still a growing problem, but it will be, I think, perhaps an insurmountable problem next year. And then you have to worry about, well, manipulation of information is making something seem very popular when in fact it is not because it's getting boosted by all these likes and reposts from AI powered bots. So that's why I sort of think somewhat inevitably it leads to some small payment in order to, to dramatically increase cost of a bot. So frankly, I think probably any social media system that doesn't do that will simply be overrun by bots.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
I think my general answer would be we need to show that we are on top of mitigating. The risks. Right. So people can trust the technology. That's what actually the last couple of days has been about on the Safety Summit is just showing we're investing in the Safety Institute, having the people who can do the research on these things, things to figure out how we mitigate against them. And we have to do it fast and we have to keep iterating it because all of us probably in this room believe that the technology can be incredibly powerful. But we've got to make sure we bring people along that journey with us, that we're handling the risks that are there and as there's a job to do. And the last couple of days I think we made good progress on it because we want to focus on the positives and manage these things. But that requires action and, and that's what the last couple of days has been about. Your story, your analogy. There was part of the research that actually, you know, the team working on the task force here published and presented yesterday. I don't know if you saw it was, which is a. Essentially that it was using AI to do. To create a ton of fake profiles on social media and then infiltrate particular groups with particular information. And actually at the moment that is a set to your point, it's like cost free.
Demis Hassabis
It's getting to the point where it's like really, you can have 100 for
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
a penny sort of thing.
Demis Hassabis
Ridiculous.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
And if you think about some of these social networks at quite a neighborhood or town level, it's not that many fake profiles. Quickly, suddenly they're everywhere and there's some local issue that might be of importance and you know, the team have run versions of how that would look like and suddenly they're interacting with everybody and then spreading misinformation around. Yeah, we literally, as part of the research that we published on misinformation information yesterday. It's a real challenge.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah, exactly to your point. I mean the images, you don't even need to steal somebody's picture because that's traceable. But you can actually just say create a new image of a person realistic looking, but doesn't exist and, and then create a biography realistic, but doesn't exist and do that en masse. And practically the only way you'll be able to tell is that the grammar is too good to give away. Yeah, no typos.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Come on now I'm getting waved at because I think we are out of time. I know. We take one very brief last question question and let's make a good one. Yes, sir. Go on. You're right in front of me. Go on, Elon.
Demis Hassabis
Question for you related to X platform,
Grainger Commercial Announcer
are there simple things we can do,
Demis Hassabis
especially when it comes to visual media? You alluded to the fact that it's fairly straightforward and effectively free to make people like yourself say and do things that you never said or did. Can we do something like cryptographically signed media? I'm from Adobe, we're working on this project. Twitter was a member. Love to see X come back. Digitally signed media to indicate not only
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
what was created by AI, but what
Demis Hassabis
came from a camera, what was real. Yeah. To imbue a sense of trust in media that can go viral. That sounds like a good idea, actually. So if some way of authenticating would be good. So, yeah, that sounds like a good idea. We should probably do it.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
There you go. And actually on that, on that point already, this is particularly pertinent for people in my job, Right. And I've already had a situation happen to me with a doctored image that goes everywhere negative. By the time everyone realizes, well, that's fake and we should stop sending it. The damage is damage. And actually we were again reflecting today. If you think next year you've got elections in, you know, I think, you know, the us, India, I think Indonesia, probably. Here you go, massive news. And actually you've got just an enormous chunk of the world's population is voting next year. Right. And you got EU elections as well. You know, actually just these issues are right in front of us. You know, next year is one of big elections across the globe. Probably the first set of elections where this has been a real issue. So figuring out how we manage that is, I think, kind of mission critical for people who want the integrity of our democracy.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah. I mean, some of it is quite entertaining. Like the Pope in the puffer jacket. Have you seen that one? That's amazing. But I mean, I still run into people who think that's real. I'm like, well, what are the odds? He's wearing a puffer jacket in July and he'll be sweating. But it actually looked quite dashing. In fact, I think AI fashion is going to be a real thing. So I don't. Doom and gloomy. We live in the most interesting times. And I think this is. It is, you know, like 80% likely to be good and 20% bad. I think if we're cognizant and careful about the bad part, on balance, actually it will be the future that we want or the future that is preferable. And it actually will be somewhat of a leveler an equalizer in the sense that, you know, I think everyone will have access to goods and services and education. And so, you know, I think probably it leads to more human happiness. So I guess I'd probably leave it on an optimistic note.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Perfect.
Demis Hassabis
Yeah.
UK Government Official (likely a Minister or Prime Minister)
Well, that's it. That is a great note to end on. I think we all want that, that better future. I think it's that the promise of it is certainly that lots of people in this room, including yourselves, are working hard to make it happen. Our job in government is to make sure it happens safely. But on the basis of this conversation in the last couple of days, I'm certainly leaving more confident.
Grainger Commercial Announcer
Thanks for listening.
Demis Hassabis
See you in the next episode.
VRBoCare Commercial Announcer
When you manage procurement for multiple facilities, every order matters. But when it's for a hospital system, they matter even more. Grainger gets it and knows there's no time for managing multiple suppliers and no room for shipping delays. That's why Grainger offers millions of products in fast, dependable delivery so you can keep your facility stocked, safe, and running smoothly. Call 1-800-GRAINGER Click grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done. When you manage procurement for multiple facilities, every order matters. But when it's for a hospital system, they matter even more. Grainger gets it and knows there's no time for managing multiple suppliers and no room for shipping delays. That's why Grainger offers millions of products in fast, dependable delivery so you can keep your facility stocked, safe and running smoothly. Call 1-800-GRAINGER Click grainger.com or just stop by Grainger for the ones who get it done.
Podcast: Elon Musk Thinking
Host: Astronaut Man
Guests: UK Government Official (Prime Minister), Demis Hassabis
Date: April 8, 2026
This episode dives deep into the current state and future trajectory of artificial intelligence, public safety, global regulatory efforts, and the societal impacts of exponential AI growth. The conversation features the UK Prime Minister and AI pioneer Demis Hassabis. Together, they explore themes of AI regulation, innovation, open source, economic shifts, and tangible impacts on everyday life, all through a candid, sometimes humorous, and always thought-provoking exchange.
Timestamps: 01:30–06:15
"It is somewhat of the magic genie problem... usually those stories don't end well. Be careful what you wish for." — Hassabis (03:13)
“Having a referee is a good thing. If you look at any sports game, there's always a referee.” — Hassabis (05:15)
Timestamps: 09:44–12:39
“It's like our digital God is a CSV file, really.” — Hassabis (12:33)
Timestamps: 12:39–18:21
“There will come a point where no job is needed. You can have a job if you want for personal satisfaction, but AI will be able to do everything.” — Hassabis (15:01)
Timestamps: 18:21–19:58
“...if you have an AI that has memory... you can talk to it every day and those conversations build upon each other. You will actually have a great friend...” — Hassabis (19:29)
Timestamps: 20:32–23:40
“The thing about Community Notes is it doesn’t actually delete anything, it simply adds context... maximum transparency.” — Hassabis (21:14)
Timestamps: 24:25–29:47
Timestamps: 30:20–33:03
Practical Benefits:
From improved customer service to streamlined government services and better education, AI’s immediate impact is described as “having a very smart friend you can ask anything.”
“The most immediate thing is just being able to ask, like having a very smart friend that you can ask anything.” — Hassabis (32:09)
Remaining Technical Challenges:
Current limitations include AI hallucinations—answers that are confidently wrong but “with great grammar, bullet points, and everything.”
Timestamps: 33:34–36:46
“If you have a humanoid robot, it can basically chase you anywhere. So... a localized safe state ability, an off switch.” — Hassabis (35:28)
Timestamps: 37:38–44:32
“Frankly, I think probably any social media system that doesn’t do that will simply be overrun by bots.” — Hassabis (39:49)
“If some way of authenticating [media] would be good. So, yeah, that sounds like a good idea. We should probably do it.” — Hassabis (42:34)
Timestamps: 43:44–44:15
“It is, you know, like 80% likely to be good and 20% bad. If we're cognizant and careful about the bad part, on balance... it will be the future that we want.” — Hassabis (44:02)
This episode provides an honest, clear-eyed view of AI’s monumental opportunities and urgent challenges. Listeners will come away with new perspectives on global cooperation, the future of work, the imperative for regulation and technical safeguards, and—perhaps surprisingly—why hope and optimism for the future are justified if we act with foresight.
End of Summary