
Learn about the history of every rank from private to general
Loading summary
Gary Arndt
The following is an encore presentation of Everything Everywhere Daily Every military in the world is a hierarchical organization. There are people at the top who make decisions, people down below who follow those orders, and people in between who make it happen. Today, most militaries have an elaborate rank structure with multiple ranks in the chain of command. However, it wasn't always like that. The modern system of ranks evolved over time, and the ranks that exist today have origins that go back centuries. Learn more about military ranks, where they came from, and what they mean on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. This podcast is brought to you in part by Stash. Are you still putting off savings and investing because you'll get to it someday? Stash turns someday into today Stash isn't just an investing app. It's a registered investment advisor that combines automated investing with dependable financial strategies to help you reach your goals faster. They'll provide you with personalized advice on what to invest in based on your goals. Or if you just want to sit back and watch your money go to work, you can opt in to their award winning expert managed portfolio that picks stocks for you. Stash has helped millions of Americans reach their financial goals and starts at just $3 per month. Don't let your savings sit around, make them work harder for you. Go to get.stash.com everything to see how you can receive $25 towards your first stock purchase and to view important disclosures. That's get.stash.com everything paid down client Endorsement not representative of all clients and not a guarantee Investment Advisory services offered by Stash Investments LL SEC Registered Investment Advisor Investing involves risk offer is subject to T's and C's. This episode is sponsored by Mint Mobile. I don't know about you, but I like to know where my money is going. The problem is that big mobile companies like money too. After years of paying a ton for wireless services, I finally got fed up with crazy high wireless bills, bogus fees and free perks that actually cost more money in the long run and just switch to Mint Mobile. Mint Mobile is here to rescue you with premium wireless plans starting at just 15 bucks a month. All plans come with high speed data and unlimited talk and text delivered on the nation's largest 5G network. Use your own phone with any Mint Mobile plan and bring your phone number along with all of your existing contacts. Nothing has to change. Ditch overpriced wireless and get three months of premium wireless service from Mint mobile for just $15 a month. If you like your money, Mint Mobile is for you. Shop plans@mintmobile.com eed that's mintmobile.com eed upfront payment of $45 for three months 5GB plan required equivalent to $15 a month new customer offer for first three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. I'm guessing that most of you are at least familiar with the Most basic military RA ranks General, Colonel, Sergeant, Private, etc. What those ranks represent and what the terms mean were something that evolved over time. But before I get into individual ranks and how they were established, we should go way back to how ranks were created in the first place. When humans began organized warfare, it was small bands of people who probably all knew each other. There was no need for a hierarchy beyond that of someone who was a leader. The name of that person was probably just whatever the word for leader was in whatever language they spoke. However, over time, armed groups grew larger. This corresponded with the rise of civilizations and agriculture. Larger, more organized states were capable of raising larger armies. These armies were a far cry from the band of extended relatives that fought together during the Paleolithic age. These armies required significant amounts of organization and logistics to move and fight. One of the first civilizations to raise massive armies of this size was ancient Persia. Persia was the largest empire of its time, encompassing many different cultures and languages. Persia was able to raise armies of tens or even hundreds of thousands of men. They organized their army in a way that actually made quite a bit of sense, something you would have expected to have been developed in later centuries. They organized their units by factors of 10. The smallest unit consisted of 10 men and was called a dathabam. The leader of a dathabam was called a dathapattus. The next unit was that of a hundred men called a Satabam, which was led by a satapattis. A unit of 1000 men was a Hazarabam and was commanded by a Hazara padus. Finally, a unit of 10,000 men was a bavarabam, commanded by a bavara padas. At the very top was a commander in chief known as the Aran Safbad. This hierarchy was rather simple by modern standards. An army of 100,000 soldiers would only have five levels of hierarchy, from the top commander down to the simplest soldier. At the bottom of the hierarchy, you didn't have a whole lot of diversity. You had spear wielding, foot soldiers, archers and cavalry. Logistical roles would have been filled by camp followers or by the soldiers themselves. The Roman military had a very different system. If you remember my episode on that subject, their commanders were usually elected during the republican period. Oftentimes, armies would be led by one of the two sitting consuls. The commander of an army was called a legate, and under them were tribunes who were often the sons of high status Roman families. Below them were centurions, who were responsible for much of the real work of the army. After the Roman Empire fell in the west, there were changes to how militaries were organized in both the west and in the remnant empire in the East, AKA the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantines established a very complicated military hierarchy, with the strategos at the top, followed by turmaches, drungarios, domestikos, magistros, and finally comes. The Byzantine army is probably worth its own episode in the future, but suffice it to say, it was complicated. In Western Europe, feudalism developed a rigid social system with peasants and nobility. Pretty much every military was a reflection of the feudal system. The head of an army would be a lord or a king. If you were a lesser noble, you would be a knight or some other commander. And if you were a penniless peasant, then you were a foot soldier. With only some exceptions, it really didn't matter how smart or talented you were. Social rank was commensurate with military rank. Things started to change in the Renaissance as armies became more professional and larger, but they didn't change that much. Even going into the 18th and 19th centuries, you could still buy an officer commission. In the British army, ranks became more formalized in the 18th and 19th centuries, even down to the lowest soldier. As armies became professionalized, they allowed for promotion and advancement, even for common soldiers, something which was possible in the past, but the options were very limited. When the World wars came about in the 20th century, the Allies had issues with their ranks. For the most part, there were similar ranks in each army, but the ranks weren't exactly the same, which made things awkward when you had joint commands. In a previous episode on the subject of six star generals, I mentioned that the rank of five star General in the American military was created simply because other Allied armies had a rank of Field Marshal that the Americans didn't have. When NATO was formed after the war, one of the things the Allies did was normalize their ranks across all the member nations. The names for some of the ranks may be different in some countries, but there were now clear equivalents in rank. Likewise, rank equivalents were made across all branches of the armed services. In the United States Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force all have the same number of ranks, with equivalent ranks There are currently nine enlisted ranks across all NATO countries with a special 10th rank for the single top non commissioned officer in each armed forces branch. Four of the ranks are for enlisted soldiers and five for non commissioned officers. Likewise, there are 10 NATO equivalent officer ranks, two junior officer ranks, three senior officer ranks, and five general flag officer ranks. So with that, I want to discuss the origin of each of the current military ranks. Each rank has a unique history and the words have a unique etymology. I'm mostly going to be using American army ranks, but they're very similar to ranks in other countries as well. So I might as well start with the most common rank, that of private. Private is the lowest rank in pretty much any army. Historically, what we consider a private has also been known as a soldier, a, a footman or some equivalent. The term private comes from the term private soldier. And you might be asking yourself what is so private about a private? If there's a private, is there a public? Well, actually, sort of. The term private soldier has been described in a few different ways. The first is that private soldiers were distinct from members of the nobility who were officers and led more public lives, similar to how someone might call themselves a private citizen. Another explanation is that a private soldier was somebody who didn't have anyone under them. He was only responsible for themselves. The term private soldier is an antiquated term that isn't used much today, but it was frequently used as late as the 18th and 19th centuries. The term was first used in the British military and it was later copied by the Americans who for the most part just copied the British ranks. It was first used as a full rank in the military in the 18th century. In the US army there are two ranks of private, the lowest of which is often just called a recruit, and a third rank is called a private first class. Going up in rank. The next rank would be a corporal. A corporal is usually considered to be the lowest rank of a non commissioned officer. The word corporal is derived from the Latin word corpus, which means body, with the medieval Latin derivative word corporalis, meaning of the body. This rank originally denoted an officer responsible for a body of troops or a particular unit. It currently has a NATO rank of or 4 and a uniformed services pay grade rank in the United States of E4. Next up are sergeants. The word sergeant comes from Old French, which itself comes from the Latin word serviens, meaning one who serves. This rank historically denoted a servant or attendant. Some organizations, such as the United States House of Representatives, have a sergeant at Arms, which is not a military position, but rather reflects the ancient use of the word. The US army has multiple ranks of sergeant, including Sergeant Major, first Sergeant, Master Sergeant, Sergeant first Class and Staff Sergeant. The rank was first used in the British military and the name came from the fact that each officer was assigned a sergeant, which explains the name and its origin as a servant. Today's sergeants are the highest ranking non commissioned officers and each rank of the military has a special rank of a single sergeant, known as the Sergeant Major of the army or Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps. Above sergeants are officers and the lowest ranking officers are lieutenants. The word lieutenant comes from the French words loup, meaning place and tenant, which means holding. Combined they mean holding in place, referring to someone who holds a position. In the absence of a higher authority, a lieutenant would have been someone acting in the name and authority of the king. In the U.S. army, Marines and Air Force, there are second lieutenants and first lieutenants. A big question many people, including many British people, wonder is why Commonwealth countries pronounce it as lieutenant when there's nothing in the word that would indicate something that sounds like the letter F. The best reason I've heard is that in Old French the word loo was actually pronounced loof and that was the pronunciation that took hold in Britain. The lieutenant pronunciation was used in the American military as late as the 1790s but eventually fell out of favor. The next rank is that of captain. Captain comes from the Latin word caput, meaning head. The term was used to denote the leader of a unit or head of a company of soldiers. While the origin of the word is the same as that of a naval captain, a captain in the Navy and a captain in the army have totally different equivalent ranks. A naval captain is the equivalent of an army colonel. An army captain is normally the head of a company that usually consists of roughly one to 200 soldiers. Above a captain is a major. The origin of major is very straightforward. It comes from the Latin term major, meaning greater or senior. It was originally used to denote the senior subordinate of a colonel. A major can lead a company or they could be an executive officer in a larger unit, such as a regiment or even a brigade. Above major is colonel. The US Military has lieutenant colonels and just colonels. The word originates from the Italian word colanello, which means column of soldiers. The title refers to the commander of a column or regiment in the 16th and 17th centuries. The word colonel has a very odd pronunciation given how the word is spelled. The reason has to do with the fact that the Italian word came to English via French. The French had originally changed the spelling of the Italian word to coronel C o r o n e l, and that's also how it's spelled in Spanish. For whatever reason, in English, the original Italian spelling was taken, but the pronunciation was pronounced in the French manner, which had a completely different spelling. And by the way, Colonel Sanders, the founder of Kentucky Fried Chicken, did not hold that rank in the military. Rather, he was a Kentucky Colonel, an honorary title bestowed by the State of Kentucky. A colonel will usually be in charge of a regiment. Finally, above colonel is general. The word general is derived from the Latin word generalis, meaning pertaining to all or universal. This term came into use as a rank in the French army and was adopted by the British army and subsequently by the American army to denote the highest level of command. There are currently five ranks of generals on the books in the United States. In order of seniority, from lowest to highest is a Brigadier General, a Major General, a Lieutenant General, a General, and a General of the Army. And if you remember back to my episode, there is also a sixth rank of general known as General of the Armies, but it's rarely, rarely used. And note that while a major outranks a lieutenant, a lieutenant general outranks a major general. And Germany in the 19th century used to have a rank known as a Colonel General. In this episode, I focus primarily on army ranks, which are very similar to ranks in other branches of the military, save for the Navy. Naval ranks and traditions are very different, and I'll save those for a future episode. As with many things in our world, military traditions date back centuries, which is why many military ranks with odd spellings or pronunciations still exist today. The executive producer of Everything Everywhere Daily is Charles Daniel. The associate producers are Austin Oakton and Cameron Kiefer. I want to thank everyone who supports the show over on Patreon. Your support helps make this podcast possible. I'd also like to thank all the members of the Everything Everywhere community who are active on the Facebook group and the Discord server. If you'd like to join in the discussion, there are links to both in the show notes and as always, if you leave a review or send me a boostogram, you too can have it read on the show.
Host: Gary Arndt | Glassbox Media
Release Date: March 27, 2025
In this encore episode of Everything Everywhere Daily, host Gary Arndt delves into the intricate evolution of military ranks, tracing their origins from ancient times to the modern-day structures prevalent in armed forces around the world. Gary sets the stage by emphasizing the fundamental nature of militaries as hierarchical institutions, where decisions flow from the top and orders are executed by those below.
“Every military in the world is a hierarchical organization. There are people at the top who make decisions, people down below who follow those orders, and people in between who make it happen.” (02:15)
Gary begins by exploring one of the earliest examples of organized military hierarchies in ancient Persia. The Persian Empire, renowned for its vast expanse and diverse cultures, managed to assemble formidable armies numbering in the tens or even hundreds of thousands. These forces were systematically organized by factors of ten:
This hierarchical simplicity facilitated effective command and logistics, crucial for maintaining such large-scale military operations.
“Persia was able to raise armies of tens or even hundreds of thousands of men. They organized their army in a way that actually made quite a bit of sense...” (05:30)
Contrasting with Persian structures, Gary examines the Roman military system. During the Roman Republic, military commanders were often elected, typically one of the two consuls. The hierarchy included:
Post the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire in the East developed an even more complex military hierarchy, featuring ranks such as Strategos, Turmaches, Drungarios, Domestikos, Magistros, and Comes.
“The Roman military had a very different system... Each rank had specific responsibilities that maintained the structure and efficiency of the army.” (09:45)
With the advent of feudalism in Western Europe, military ranks became a direct reflection of the rigid social hierarchy. The structure was straightforward:
This system emphasized social status over military competence, limiting the potential for talented individuals to ascend the ranks.
“Social rank was commensurate with military rank. Things started to change in the Renaissance as armies became more professional and larger...” (14:10)
The Renaissance sparked a transformation in military organization, leading to more professional and sizable armies. Despite these advancements, the ability to purchase officer commissions persisted into the 18th and 19th centuries, especially within the British Army. This practice maintained a semblance of social hierarchy, even as armies became more structured and merit-based opportunities for advancement began to surface.
“When the World wars came about in the 20th century, the Allies had issues with their ranks... NATO was formed after the war, one of the things the Allies did was normalize their ranks across all the member nations.” (18:25)
World War I and World War II highlighted inconsistencies in military ranks among Allied forces, complicating joint operations. In response, the formation of NATO led to the standardization of ranks across member nations, ensuring clear equivalencies irrespective of national differences. This harmonization extended across all branches of the armed services, establishing a cohesive structure that persists today.
“NATO was formed after the war, one of the things the Allies did was normalize their ranks across all the member nations.” (21:00)
Gary provides a comprehensive overview of modern military ranks, primarily focusing on the American Army while noting similarities across other nations. Each rank’s unique history and linguistic origins reveal much about their current roles and responsibilities.
“The term private soldier has been described in a few different ways... it was frequently used as late as the 18th and 19th centuries.” (25:40)
“The word corporal is derived from the Latin word corpus, which means body...” (28:10)
“The word sergeant comes from Old French, which itself comes from the Latin word serviens, meaning one who serves.” (30:55)
“The term was first used as a full rank in the military in the 18th century.” (32:20)
“The word originates from the Italian word colanello, which means column of soldiers... in English, the original Italian spelling was taken, but the pronunciation was pronounced in the French manner.” (36:15)
“Above a captain is a major. It was originally used to denote the senior subordinate of a colonel.” (38:40)
“The word colonel has a very odd pronunciation given how the word is spelled... Colonel Sanders... was a Kentucky Colonel, an honorary title.” (40:05)
“There are currently five ranks of generals on the books in the United States... General of the Armies, but it's rarely, rarely used.” (42:30)
Gary wraps up by acknowledging that while this episode focused primarily on army ranks, naval ranks and traditions present a completely different structure deserving their own exploration in future episodes. He highlights how deeply rooted military traditions are, which is why many ranks with peculiar spellings or pronunciations have endured through centuries.
“As with many things in our world, military traditions date back centuries, which is why many military ranks with odd spellings or pronunciations still exist today.” (45:10)
Gary also expresses gratitude towards the production team and the listeners who support the show, encouraging engagement through Patreon, Facebook, and Discord.
Executive Producer: Charles Daniel
Associate Producers: Austin Oakton and Cameron Kiefer
Acknowledgments: Patreon supporters and community members on Facebook and Discord.
This episode offers a thorough examination of the historical development of military ranks, providing listeners with a nuanced understanding of how modern hierarchical structures came to be. From ancient Persia's organized armies to NATO's standardized ranks, Gary Arndt masterfully navigates through time, illuminating the interplay between society, language, and military organization.