Loading summary
A
A lot of investors are now taking a second look at secondaries, once a niche corner of the financial world. Private equity secondary funds, which buy existing stakes from other PE funds, have experienced substantial growth over the past few years. So what does the growth tell us about private markets as a whole and what role can secondaries play in portfolios today? I'm Allison Nathan and this is Goldman Sachs exchanges. Today I'm joined by my colleagues Harold Hope and Alex BLAustin. Alex covers U.S. asset managers and other financial companies for Goldman Sachs Research. And Harold sits in our asset and wealth management division where he is the global head of Vintage Strategies, one of the world's largest secondary fund managers. Harold, Alex, welcome to the program.
B
Thank you.
C
Thanks for having us.
A
So, Harold, let's start at a very basic level here. What is secondary's investing and tell us a little bit about the history of the space.
B
We really love the private equity model, but one of the big drawbacks is that it's very illiquid and private equity investments can often last 10, 15 years or longer. What we're doing in the secondaries is really providing liquidity to folks who have invested in these long dated illiquid assets before their natural termination. So if you're in a private equity investment that's going to last 15 years and you want to get out in year five or six or seven or eight, we'll come in and buy your interest out early and we'll ultimately hold it to maturity. So the market started really as a handful of small specialist firms who were doing a couple of transactions a year from people who really needed liquidity. And it's developed into a much larger market, many more players, much higher volumes, helping to not only solve liquidity, but also help investors with active management or other solutions to their interim liquidity needs. There's probably two big parts of the market. One is buying limited partnership interest or LP secondaries from investors and funds. And the other is helping managers of private equity funds hold on to some of their best assets for longer than their funds would naturally allow. And oftentimes those are called continuation vehicles or sometimes GP led secondaries.
A
So, Alex, give us some numbers here. How fast is the secondary space growing and what's driven that growth? Harold touched on that, but maybe you could give us a bit more detail.
C
Yeah, of course we'll touch on the sizing and the growth maybe first, and then we'll hit on a couple of drivers. So to Harold's points, the growth has been phenomenal. The market today sits at about $650 billion in assets under management. It is predominantly an institutional marketplace. It's probably close to 90% still institutional. But we are starting to see retail participate in that market as well. And we'll probably get into that a little bit later in the conversation. The space has compounded at about a 15% growth rate over the last 10 years. And while most of the asset classes are still centered around private equity, we're starting to see evolution in private credit, private infrastructure and to some extent real estate, although that's still quite small when you think about the volumes. And that's really the exciting part of what's happening today. The volumes in the market are on track to be at about $200 billion just this year. So it's accelerating really nicely. And it's coming from both places. Both the LP LED secondaries, which is roughly running at about half the market today, to Harold's Points, a rising number of manager or GP led secondaries that's comprising a really large size of the market also. Now look in terms of the drivers and how we got here, just like any market, a secondary market is going to be a function of the primary market. So private markets, liquid strategies have grown massively over the last decade. Plus that space is compounding at a 10 to 15% a year as well. So it makes sense that secondaries would follow that. And then there are some cyclical factors. Like over the last couple of years, clearly there's been very limited liquidity and limited returns from private equity in particular back to LPs, back to their investors. So that's one of the ways to give some clients some liquidity back, but also participate in growth of this new asset class.
A
And as we've seen this growth continue, are we seeing the fund structures actually change?
C
So one of the biggest changes that we're seeing is likely the rise of retail. That's probably been one of the more powerful trends, that it's not really occurring only in secondaries. That's pretty consistent across other private markets asset classes. And it's one of the biggest growth themes that we've been following. But if you look at the retail space, it's about $40 billion in NAV today, but it's growing almost at a 50% organic growth. There's a handful of managers that are fairly sizable that launched retail strategies targeting this type of product. So the secondary product, again predominantly in private equity, but we're starting to see that in credit as well. And the flows in that business are been obviously material. Now what does that do? And back to Your kind of structural change, it provides a lot more liquidity to the market. So we do think that this could help enable more transactions. And just like with any market, liquidity starts to be a liquidity. And that's probably one of the biggest structural changes we've seen recently.
A
And Harold, from your seat we talked about this pretty astounding growth that Alex just mentioned, and you mentioned as well. But from your seat, has that changed the market at all? And do you think of that mostly as providing more opportunities or are there also some challenges that come with that growth?
B
Well, I mean, look like any market that's grown that quickly, there's going to be both opportunities and challenges. I do think as a buyer, I think it's a pretty interesting investment environment. Right now we've got record demand for liquidity, driven in large part, I think, by the muted distributions in private equity the last couple of years and the need for people to find other sources of liquidity. So the opportunity set's pretty big. And while evergreens and new competitors are coming in, we're at a point in the market where it's still pretty much a relatively small number of scaled experienced buyers. So I think that sets up for an interesting time to be a buyer in secondaries now as the market evolves and as distributions normalize and some of these new entrants and competitors achieve scale. And as we watch what happens in the retail part of the market, I think we'll end up on the other side of all this with a much larger but probably more competitive market and an environment that might be a little bit friendlier for sellers. I think if you're a seller today, my guess is you're feeling like you're getting pretty good value on parts of your portfolio. But there are other parts of your portfolio that are very difficult to sell. Maybe names that are less well known, maybe some of the strategies that are a little bit more esoteric. I think as a seller you need to be pretty thoughtful about where you seek liquidity in order to get the best value. And a lot of sellers now in the market are first time sellers into the secondaries. And there's a lot of education that's happening for them as well. These are not easy to do transactions, especially if you want to sell a big portfolio. Something like that may take multiple quarters to ultimately close. And so I think it's going to be, as Alex alludes to, I think it's going to be good for the market long term. As the market grows and sellers become more accustomed to how deals work. But for some, it's an education process right now.
A
But Harold, I have to tell you, I have been seeing headlines about, quote, manic activity in the space. So should we be concerned at all about that? What's your take on that?
B
I don't really see any manic behavior out there in the market. I think that it might be manic in the sense that people are super busy. Alex mentioned this year we think it's going to be a $200 billion plus year for secondaries. Ten years ago it was 40 to 45 billion. So we've just seen dramatic growth in the market, and that's causing a lot of the experienced buyers to be quite busy. But in terms of the investing environment, I think there's always parts of the market that are going to feel fully valued, and there's other parts of the market that feel like, you know, you're getting really attractive value, and that's what makes a market.
A
And Alex, when you think about your conversations with investors right now, how are they thinking about using secondaries within their portfolios? What purpose is it serving? You mentioned some diversification. Talk to us a little bit more about that.
C
Yeah, so portfolio construction is a big theme because LPs, institutional investors have gotten a lot more sophisticated, of course, over the years. And if you say, hey, US Pension plants have been participating in these asset classes for a longer period of time, when you go down to sovereign wealth funds and other parts of the ecosystem, that space is still maturing and now becoming to a point where the using private equity, using private credit, the use in infrastructure in real estate. So part of a portfolio construction tool that's been pretty important, mitigating vintage risk, so to speak. And concentration has also been a pretty big theme. So there's a number of these structural tools that the secondary product brings forth now cyclically. A lot of LPs are obviously using this today to get liquidity. And importantly, a lot of the managers are using some of their trophy assets to kind of hold on to them a bit longer via continuation vehicle and that fund structure to say, hey, I'm not ready to sell it entirely, but I would like to get some capital back to LPs. And that's another big use case for this.
A
And are you hearing the same?
B
The way investors using secondaries has changed a lot. When I started, most investors were using secondaries to start a new private equity program. It was a way for them to get a lot of diversification, deploy capital a little bit faster while they built a traditional program. Today, I think Many investors are actually having a core allocation to secondaries. They're viewing it as a strategy that has a very good balance between risk and return. They can get in with a little bit faster duration. It allows them to control their cash flows a little bit better. And it's proven to be a strategy that can deploy capital both when times are good as well as in periods of dislocation. So because of that, I think that investors are allocating to the sector in a different way than they used to. And then, as Alex has alluded to, I think managers of private equity funds are approaching the secondary market in a very different way than they did historically, I would say historically, if you are a manager of a private equity fund and one of your investors wanted to get out, it was a bit of a nuisance for you, really. You had to deal with transferring the interest to another buyer, making sure that buyer was credit worthy. Suddenly you had a new LP in your fund that you had to deal with. And really they didn't get anything out of those transactions. I think today for smart managers, they're approaching the market very differently. They're really trying to develop some relationships with secondary buyers. They want to be proactive. If one of their investors has a liquidity issue or wants early liquidity, they want to figure out a way to be helpful there. They view it as a good thing to do for their reputation in the market. And the rise of these continuation vehicles where, as mentioned, you can take great assets and hold them for longer than your fund otherwise might allow, that's a transaction where I think the managers can really benefit from that. They've really embraced that today. And if you look at the top 200 private equity managers at this point, most of them have either completed a continuation vehicle transaction or brought one to market. And so I think market acceptance in that part of the transaction type is really high today.
A
And just take us a little bit into your investment process a bit. What drives your investment decisions? Are you looking for certain vintages? Are you looking for certain geographies, certain sectors?
B
Well, I mean, I think in our investment process there's a micro and a macro element to it. On the micro level, what we're really doing day to day is we're valuing companies, we're looking at private equity portfolios, we're valuing the underlying assets, and we're trying to buy those portfolios at reasonable values. And so the micro work of going in and valuing each underlying company, like, isn't that hard in theory. What makes it hard is the ability to do it among private companies where there's oftentimes not a lot of information, and to do it in scale. You know, if you want to buy someone's portfolio of 50 fund interest that might have 500 underlying portfolio companies in it. And so to be able to value that portfolio in a couple of weeks takes a lot of existing knowledge and also a lot of people and technology and all these types of things. Fundamentally, it's a micro driven business. But I think from our perspective, the macro is also very important. We have targets around how much we want to buy in certain geographies or in certain strategies, or the mix between traditional secondaries and continuation vehicles, because each of them, we think, has different kind of risk return characteristics. So we are ultimately trying to construct a portfolio for investors that balances the risk and return across all those different parts of the market.
A
But Alex, if we look a little bit more broadly, what does the growth of secondaries tell us about the alternative asset space as a whole? Is it a healthy sign or does it point to problems in other parts of the private markets?
C
Yeah, so it's interesting because in the press you might see headlines back to your original question like that might perceive this to be a negative thing.
B
Right?
C
It perceives it to be, hey, there's not a lot of liquidity and therefore LPs are forced to sell their stakes because they need to get out. And that's really not what we're seeing as a reality on the ground. We do think ultimately that's a net positive for the space because it's going to create more liquidity. And if you took private equity as a proxy of what could happen in other asset classes, that probably will fuel further growth. Right. So turnover in private equity is still quite low. It's like maybe 2%, maybe 2 and a half percent or so relative to the size of the market. In private credit it's even lower. In infrastructure it's even lower. Right. So as those classes, asset classes mature, you could see how this becomes another sort of liquidity wrap around them and that should enable investors to maneuver between the asset classes slightly easier. The other point here, and perhaps that's not a very positive point for the public markets, but it probably enables companies to stay private longer because you do have other vehicles and more comfort level from LPs to participate in longer sort of ownership of these assets. The stat that I find fascinating also is the total dry powder in the secondary space right now I think is about 200 billion. And we just earlier talked about the turnover and the Volumes annually just this year will be about 200 billion. Right. So there's actually not that much capital in the system today to meet potential volume of activity. And therefore this should create a pretty positive risk Reward for new LPs.
A
But let me go back to a point that you made earlier, which was that the fate of secondaries, of the secondaries market really is tied to in some ways the fate of the private markets more generally. And we've had a lot of discussion about private equity running into some obstacles. Will that have any bearing on how you think about the secondary space?
C
Yeah, I mean look, you can't solve a bad investment with a different wrapper, right? So of course it's going to come down to the point, is it a good company is a good business, can the underlying deliver on the returns that it was supposed to deliver on at the original inception of that deal? We are generally still pretty favorably predisposed to growth in private markets. Different asset classes will face different growth rates. So we've been really bullish in private credit continue to see that is to be the case. Infrastructure is another good one. And in private equity we do think it's going to be the world of relative winners and losers. And we're seeing that today. If I look at returns for some of the gps or some of the asset managers, a number of them have actually returned quite substantial amount of capital back to their LPs. And those are the ones that are in the market today raising very sizable funds. And there's going to be a tale of private equity firms that really are unlikely to do that. Will secondaries solve their issue, maybe to better portfolio. So it could be helpful tool, but that's certainly not going to solve a bad investment problem.
A
So if we put this all together, you talked a little bit about the recent growth, the run rate over the next five, 10 years. What are we looking at in terms of the size of this market?
C
We're pretty bullish. Look, we think the growth, that 15% growth that I said earlier, we actually think it accelerates from here. Part of that is turnover in private equity is picking up. So even if the size of the market doesn't change dramatically, there's that supply demand imbalance where there's not enough dry powder to meet the likely supply of volume. And when you look at credit infrastructure and down the road real estate, those turnover rates are running at almost half the rate than private equity debt. And those are fairly fast growing asset classes. So if I still think private market grows 10 to 15 and then turnover accelerates and there's not enough dry powder, it tells you the size of the market is probably going to see an.
A
Accelerating growth and that seems pretty consistent with everything you're observing.
B
Harold I think that's right. I think this is a market, as Alex mentioned, fundamentally it's driven by the big denominator of private market capital that's been raised and the need for liquidity. And especially in our market, as discounts narrow a little bit, as the navs become more reasonable, that brings more sellers in and if we can get some more capital on the buy side, I think there's definitely the opportunity for the market to grow pretty substantially.
A
Harold Alex, thanks so much for your time and educating us a bit on this really fast evolving market.
C
Yeah, thanks for having us.
A
Thanks for having us and thank you all for listening to this episode of Exchanges, which was recorded on Monday, September 29th, 2025. I'm Allison Nathan.
D
The opinions and views expressed herein are, as of the date of publication, subject to change without notice, and may not necessarily reflect the institutional views of Goldman Sachs or its affiliates. The material provided is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation from any Goldman Sachs entity to take any particular action, or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any securities or financial this material may contain forward looking statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Neither Goldman Sachs nor any of its affiliates make any representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the statements or information contained herein and disclaim any liability whatsoever for reliance on such information for any purpose. Each name of a third party organization mentioned is the property of the company to which it relates, is used here strictly for informational and identification purposes only, and is not used to imply any ownership or license rights between any such company and Goldman Sachs. A transcript is provided for convenience and may differ from the original video or audio content. Goldman Sachs is not responsible for any errors in the transcript. This material should not be copied, distributed, published or reproduced in whole or in part or disclosed by any recipient to any other person without the express written consent of Goldman Sachs. Disclosures applicable to research with respect to issuers, if any mentioned herein are available through your Goldman Sachs representative or@www.GS.com research hedge.HTML. copyright 2025 Golden Sacks. All rights reserved.
Episode Title: The Rise of Secondaries: Unlocking Liquidity in Private Markets
Date: October 14, 2025
Host: Allison Nathan
Guests: Harold Hope (Global Head of Vintage Strategies, Asset & Wealth Management), Alex BLAustin (U.S. Asset Managers Research Analyst)
This episode explores the accelerated growth and evolving role of private equity (PE) secondaries—a previously niche sector now experiencing remarkable expansion within private markets. Host Allison Nathan is joined by Harold Hope and Alex BLAustin, who demystify what secondaries are, analyze their impact on market liquidity, and discuss their growing relevance for both institutional and retail portfolios.
This episode provides a comprehensive snapshot of private market secondaries' explosive growth and rising influence. Once a niche transaction tool, secondaries now serve a central role in portfolio strategy, offering liquidity, flexibility, and risk management in a world dominated by long-term private investments. The hosts and guests agree: as private markets expand and mature, the demand for secondary liquidity will only accelerate, bringing new opportunities and considerations for investors and managers alike.