
What if your company could launch its first AI agent in just two weeks?
Loading summary
A
The philosophy with AI is assume everything's going to change. We're all obsessed with OPEX and headcount reduction and cost savings. But that's not the point of what we're trying to do here with AI. Right. The real value is how do you make your existing people more effective?
B
You guys launched your first AI agent in less than two weeks. Since then, you've reduced average handle time by 15%. You're on track to save $2 million a year from this, and you've increased sales rep efficiency by 67%.
A
The things that I would have assumed were going to be impossible earlier in my career or even a year now, possible in a few clicks.
B
Leadership teams that are going to thrive are the ones that continue to ask those types of questions. Why can't I do something different?
A
CSAT scores are above 90% right now, which is extremely high for this industry. I think it's simple. It's stop planning and start doing right. Let's be honest, in six months of planning, the tech is going to change 10 times over that. Your planning is going to continue to be wrong. Right. AI is a growth enabler, not a cost cutting exercise. So we've got to change that perspective.
B
A mic drop. That was amazing.
A
Even with the best AI and tech in the world, if people don't trust it, you're not going to get the adoption.
B
So, Rose, we've been on several meetings recently where we have like, what I want to call like an AI brainstorming session.
C
Totally.
B
Where we're with the whole team and our team's pretty small. For those listening who don't know, Mission Network is a pretty small team. So we've got like five or six voices on a call and we're just brainstorming. Oh, we could use AI to do this. We could make an AI agent that does that. Oh, we need to document our entire production workflow and figure out where we can automate things and use AI to solve all these problems. And we just create a list of a hundred different ideas and then we don't do any of them.
A
Yeah.
C
Or all of us are like, okay, I'm going to test this. You test this. They're going to test this. And then we all get excited about conflicting tools or we get excited about one particular tool, but it starts to not feel like it meshes with the tasks that we would need it to execute.
B
Yeah. I mean, there's this mix of this problem. Right. Where we've got this huge list of ideas that almost paralyzes us and then We've got distraction from all these new tools that are popping up that it's like, oh, go try this, go try that. Go try this, go try that. And. And I think there's a place in every organization to be testing out new tools, looking for new vendors to work with, all kinds of stuff like that. But I see so many businesses just get stuck in this freeze mode with the AI conversation because of this brainstorming problem of, like, my imagination opens the door to every possible idea, and yet that just kind of stops us from doing anything. Which is why I loved our conversation with Molly Bodensteiner today, who is the SVP of operations at Engine. And she said something that I'm gonna, like, paint on my wall, which is ruthless prioritization. So picking one thing and sticking with it ruthlessly, which I know. Like, again, Rose, we're a small company, so, like, if this is a problem for us in our tiny little fashion that we are, I can't imagine how much of a brainstorming imagination problem there is with companies that are a hundred people, a thousand people, 10,000 employees, 50,000 employees, like, totally. It's got so many ideas.
C
How long that task list probably gets and how overwhelming that would feel, I can't imagine.
B
Yeah. And if you're someone who's trying to spearhead, let's say, an agent AI solution, and you're like, oh, this is what we're going to do. Like, what Molly did, she started with cancel cancellations. So, you know, engine. Engine.com is a work travel company. They help you book travel for work and monitor it and see how spending's going and all that kind of stuff. So if you're like, I want to build an agentic AI tool for cancellations, but then you've got a thousand other employees that are like, oh, but you could do this, and you could add this on there, and you could add that on there. Molly said, no, shush. We're not doing any of those things yet. We're just going to do this one tool. And I feel like that set the tone for our entire conversation with her about how to think about AI implementation. And she just gave so many great tips of, like, the first tip is ruthless prioritization of just, like, really honing in on that one thing that you're gonna do. And their ability to do that meant that they were able to move really quick, and they rolled out their first agentic AI solution in just 14 days.
C
That is so crazy. I feel like we've had so many conversations that are super Cool, super high level. But they're not as practical. And it doesn't feel as, it feels more open ended. It feels like something that's not really a closed loop. It feels like this theory, this idea. But what Molly brings to the table is like, question, answer, problem, solution. It's really refreshing in terms of the whole AI conversation because like you said, it can just feel vast and scary and confusing.
B
Yeah. I mean, there are so many opportunities. So it's kind of like, which use case do you start with? How do you decide which one to say yes to, which one to say no to? Okay, now we've rolled out this first step. How soon afterwards am I adding on new use cases? Okay. Oh, we made this, you know, agent AI solution. Do I build right on top of that one or should I, you know, figure out a modular solution to this where like we're building, you know, in parallel to these different solutions rather than everything being combined into one giant solution. So there's a lot of different ways that you can think about your agentic AI rollout. And Molly basically was like, no, don't do that, don't do this, don't do that, do this. Here's my mistake that I made. Here's the failure that we had, here's the success that we had. These are the results that we had. And it's just like a true playbook and masterclass in how to think about rolling out AI. I loved her opinions, I loved the way she explained everything. And she was just so clear and precise with what to do, what to act on, what not to act on.
C
I totally agree. We talked so much about change management, how not to curate a Frankenstack, which was a term that I learned today.
B
Yeah, I mean, I think it can be really hard as a business to decide which tool to use. Right. So that Frankenstack word is this idea that you've got 20 different tools trying to band aid solutions together. So as a company, how do you avoid this problem? Especially as tools roll out all the time, how do you avoid the issue of we've now invested in 25 different AI solutions and now they're all not working together super effectively. So she talks a lot about choosing the right partner for AI implementation, how to identify vendors, when to bet on things, when not to bet on things, and just ultimately, yeah, how to think about building a tech stack in today's AI world when things are constantly changing. There was something she mentioned about how tech is table stakes. Right. So most of these solutions are 95% similar so it's not so much tech that's going to differentiate you as a company. It's actually the people in your company. Like, do I trust you as a partner? Do I want to work with you? Do I like you? Do we get along? Would I grab beer with you after our conversation? Right, totally. So I thought that was a really interesting point about how as technology becomes more similar to each other, as AI makes it easier for us to develop solutions. It's not so much about the solution itself that I care about. It's about the people that I get to work with.
C
Well, Lacy, I feel like we should probably introduce ourselves.
B
I'm your host, Lacey Peace. And you're listening to Experts of Experience.
C
And I'm Rose Shocker. I produce Experts of Experience.
B
And you're about to tune into an episode with Molly Bodensteiner, the SVP of operations at Enjin. But before you do, please hit that, like that subscribe button. Drop me a comment, Let me know who you want to hear on the show, what questions I should be asking.
C
Let us know what brands have been impressing you lately. Like, let us know who's impressing you, what customer experiences you've had recently as, as a consumer that you think we should shout out.
B
And without further ado, here is Molly Bodensteiner. Molly, welcome to Experts of Experience.
A
Thanks so much, Lacy, for having me today.
B
Yeah, I'm excited. Before we get into your background and what Engine is doing and all the amazing things I know we're going to cover today, I want to tease our audience a little bit with a few stats that I think might blow their mind. The first one is that you guys launched your first AI agent in less than two weeks. Since then, you've reduced average handle time by 15%. You're on track to save $2 million a year from this, and you've increased sales rep efficiency by 67%. Those are some amazing numbers. I can't wait to dive into all of that. But, Molly, I want to hear from you really quick. Just like an intro to you. So we've teased our audience on what we're going to cover. Who are you?
A
Yeah, absolutely. No, I'm excited. And as you went through those stats, the thing that just sat in my mind is we're just getting started too. So we have done this in such a short period of just. We're continuing to keep innovating and it's been fun. So I'm Molly Bodensteiner. I'm the SVP of operations at Engine. And so really accountable for all things people process data and technology across this org, which has made this shift in digital transformation and AI so much fun. Right. And just, again, just getting started.
B
That's awesome. And Molly, you've been at Engine for eight months, is that correct?
A
Yep. Less than a year.
B
What did it look like when you came in? Because I feel like you basically just came in and hit the ground running to accomplish all these goals that we just covered.
A
Yeah. So coming in, the thing that I appreciate the most about Engine is like, there has been this appetite for digital transformation and innovation. So I wasn't coming in and being like the change agent per se, but I think just being fortunate enough to come into a team that was curious about this and then a company that was also supportive of really, like, starting to push the boundaries of what we could and should be doing from a tech perspective has. Has made this just fun. Right. Like, and you know, we talked about the agent in. In 14 days. Right. Is not because, like, we had this pressure from senior leadership to launch an agent in 14 days. It was really, how do we. How do we put the right focus and really start to, like, test what we can do and see what happens versus I think you see a lot of companies that are like, yeah, we're going to build this huge digital transformation and AI strategy, but they're not actually getting anything done. So I think just the culture at Engine of being able to like, move quick, innovate, learn fast has definitely helped. And then the other thing is, like, just where we're at in the evolution, right? Like basic automation to, like, today's revenue intelligence platforms and, like, how much just changes, I'd say, like, daily in this space. Just the things that, like, I would have assumed were going to be impossible earlier in my career or even a year ago. Right. Are like, now possible in a few clicks.
B
That's amazing. That's amazing. So speaking of your early career, could you just guide us through a little bit of your background? I know that you've, like, live, breathe, love revops, but, like, talk me through how you got to that point.
A
Yeah, so I, you know, I've been in RevOps since before it was cool. Right. I'd say I truly started my.
B
I mean, that needs to be a T shirt. I need to get you that T shirt.
A
And I laugh because, like, I go back to, like, my internship in college, right. Was working on access databases in a sales organization. And one of the things that I did was figure out, like, how do I centralize RFP answers into an access database so that I don't have to keep populating RFPs manually. Right. So like it really, you know, was revenue technology, but like it came from like just the curiosity of like, how do I make things better, how do I make things more efficient and how do I use like technology to like optimize processes and improve experiences. And from there that just opened up more opportunities to like move into CRM and like Mark, you know, I say marketing automation platforms back then it was like really email service providers, right? We weren't even doing marketing automation. Not to age myself, but like just really gravitated towards like this revenue technology that helps, helps not only make go to market more efficient, but like more importantly it like enhances the customer experience and the customer journey. And I think like that's been like the big hook that's gotten me into operations is like, how can I actually bring again together the people, the process, the data and the technology to like have direct impact on customer experiences, whether those are internal customers and stakeholders or external ones.
B
Yeah, what I love about what you're sharing about your background is you sort of come in and you're, you're like, I don't, I. Everything's being done this way, but what if we could change that and do it differently? And I feel like that might be sort of your modality throughout your career is just like, these are the assumptions we're making and how can we make it better and how can that impact the customer in a better way? And I feel like the companies that are going to thrive, leadership teams that are going to thrive are the ones that continue to ask those types of questions, like, why do I have to fill in this RFP manually over and over and over again? Why can't I do something different? And I think a lot of the innovations we've been seeing in the space lately are the result of that first question of like, why is it this way? Can't it be that way? So finding this company, Engine, that has that culture that's mirrored back to you is really cool. So could you tell us what is Engine? If I go to engine.com, what am I going to find? For those who've never heard of the company?
A
Yeah, absolutely. So Enjin is a business travel platform, right? So we're working with primarily SMB businesses on just helping them book flights, hotels, rental cars for business travel. We have over a million travelers right now and we're supporting companies of all sizes. But what really sets us apart is like no contracts, right? No membership fees, no Agent assist fees. So we're really just helping businesses save time and money. And the fun thing about engine, since 2018 we've averaged 70% year over year growth. We've scaled to over $2 billion in valuation and are almost at 1,000 employees. And so it's been a really fun just growth experience, not only from the company perspective, but then you're overlaying like this efficiency and digital transformation on top of it.
B
Yeah. Oh man, that's. That's so cool. So kind of a smaller company compared to some of the like, large enterprises we've had the opportunity to speak to on the show. But by no means a small business. Right. So how many countries or not countries, I guess, I guess countries or states are you guys operating in? Is it just in the U.S. or are you around the world?
A
So we're located in the US but we serve clients all over the world.
B
Yeah. Wow. And with that, how many users did you say you guys have?
A
We have over a million million travelers.
B
Wow. Okay, so you mentioned this less than two weeks, this 14 day rollout of your first agentic AI agent. What did that look like? When was this? This was early, late last year, right?
A
Yep. Yeah, late last year. So towards the end of the year last year we rolled out EVA or ava, depending on who you talk talk to. The phonetics changes, but it's really Engine's virtual assistant. Right. And so one of the things that we did was we looked at our customer success side of things and said, you know, what's our highest leverage opportunity for automation? Right. And what came from the data was hotel cancellations. We had 300 requests daily, which is a lot of operating overhead. Right. So as we looked at our AI strategy and what was possible here, we decided to not take the broad strategy and instead put all of our resources just into a single use case and a single workflow and build off of that. And so it might not have been our sexiest problem, right. Or even the most technically interesting, but when we look at the volume, right, 300 cases daily, like it's costing our team a ton in productivity as well as like just customer experience that can be far furthermore simplified. Right. If I know that I need to cancel a hotel, you know, am I as a consumer and the experience, like I'd love to go talk to just a chatbot and get it done, versus like having to pick up the phone and call or like send an email and wait for a response. So what we did is we took, took and really ran like a two week sprint on this. Right. And the way that this was possible is and I'll transparently we worked with partner, so we worked with a trusted Salesforce partner especially as you know Agent Force was still relatively new on the market at that point. So making sure at that point very new.
B
I mean it had been out for what like a month at that point. I think that they announced it at Dreamforce last year.
A
Yeah, yeah, we were one of, you know, the first companies to like just be fully operational like ga public on, on Agent Force. And so using a trusted partner like was so super key. But like the other part of this is like we ruthlessly prioritized. It was, you know, one of those things where as you start seeing what you can do, like it's like, oh, we could do this, we could do this, we could do this. But like kept going back to like this is scope, this is scope, this is scope to really make sure that we could focus and like build the right thing that then we can build on top of and we have built on top of but like taking that single use case and getting that out the door. And I think that that's where a lot of companies I see get stuck in. Not even companies. Right. I even see it internally with the team. It's like, oh, we get into this like we can keep doing and doing and doing and adding and adding and adding, which is great. But if you don't ever get like the first thing out the door, you're not learning and you're not figuring out what I'm going to talk about is like where it's going to fail. So you can start to course.
B
Correct. Yeah, it's such a problem. I mean I see it in our own company even we've got a small team and we're doing media production. Right. But I was talking to a gentleman that I would like to work with to help us produce more automations and maybe you know, some AI agents that can support what we do. And I was like here's an idea, here's an idea, here's an idea. You know, like there's a hundred different ways that we could do this. And, and I do think there's still like a little bit of overhype where you know, he's like actually that idea sounds easy, but it's actually not. And so like sorting through all these different potential use cases is so difficult even in our little team that I can't imagine how difficult that is for a team of almost a thousand employees. Like what you guys have or even like a larger Enterprise is how do you take the kind of pause, the brainstorming, or at least make it, I don't know, structured in some way so that way you can identify. This is the thing we really want to focus on, and this is the thing we're going to, you know. How did you phrase it? You said ruthlessly go after.
A
Ruthlessly prioritized. Right. And, like, if we wouldn't have done that.
B
Yeah, I love that.
A
We'd probably still be building eva, right? Like, because we keep adding and keep adding and keep adding and, like, you know, it's one of those things where it's like, good versus good enough. Right? And so, like, really focused on, like, the good enough that we can learn and iterate without sacrificing, obviously, the customer experience. But, like, getting something out the door to learn is going to move us significantly faster than sitting and trying to live in this world of, like, perfection. Because realistically, with agents, there's no such thing as perfect.
B
That's. That's so true. Yeah, I do want to get into that a little bit more. But starting out with this first tool that you guys made, the cancellations, right. I, as a customer, can go in and cancel, and EVA would handle it for me. What was that initial feedback reception like, that you got maybe in December or January, you know, the couple months after it had been launched?
A
Yeah, absolutely. So, you know, one of the interesting things is, like, our actual CSATs from Eva's interactions were higher than, like, traditional chat. Right? Because, like, agents were. Wow. Or customers were actually getting faster response times. Right. And, like, smoother handoffs. And, you know, one of the things that I think we. We did really well and have done really well is, like, we designed with the customer experience in mind, but, like, we're upfront with customers. You're interacting. You're interacting with AI, Right. Like, I mean, let's be honest, as consumers, we already kind of know that anyway in most situations. But, like, being transparent and, like, building that trust, I think was things that we learned through those, like, feedback loops. And, like, the customer knows what to expect. But the other big thing that we continue to learn is, like, where limitations are, right? And, like, how do we make sure we're setting the guardrails of, like, our design to make sure EVA knows, like, when to escalate. Right. And, like, building off of that, like, we don't let her. Let her. Right. Let her struggle through complex scenarios. We make sure she knows, like, the right handoff, but then within that handoff, we have all of that context shifting. So that the customer doesn't have to repeat themselves, and we're not sacrificing the customer experience based on the limitation of the technology. And I think that was a big learning for us. As we looked at the CSAT scores and what was happening, it's like, is Eva really handing off at the right time and managing this the right way for the experience so that it's frictionless for not only our customers, but also for the agents that pick it up?
B
Yeah. Oh, no, that makes total sense. We spoke about that in the pod a little bit, is how important it is that if the AI agent can't handle it, that I don't have to repeat anything that I said, and it can be handed off really smoothly to a human agent that can do this for me. So I love that you guys really early on were solving for that and noticed that as a problem. And I don't think you would have if you weren't moving at the pace that you did and being as ruthless with what you were focused your focusing your attention on as you had. You may not have gotten that feedback so early on and solved for that so early on. So when you guys launch, you launched this cancellation tool. After that, what did you do? You kind of evaluated, how is this working? When did you start layering? Layering on. Oh, this is the next function we're going to add. This is the next way we can service our customers.
A
Yeah, absolutely. So I think from there, what we started to look at were like, what are the different topics that we want to try to cover? Right. So we've now taken this single topic here, cancellations, and it's like, okay, how do we continue to iterate off this? And one of the things I'd say we learned the hard way in this was we then had these 15 separate topics that we wanted to take back to scale. And those pieces, each of them were really focused on narrow tasks, like a reservation change or an inquiry on a car rental. And what we learned is, like, that's actually not how our customers think. Right. They don't think in these, like, isolated steps. And so by trying to start to roll those out, like, Eva really struggled with, like, that context, understanding and, like, being able to properly route that way. So what we did was we then took, you know, those 15 steps and we cut those in half. And, like, that actually changed Eva's performance by just being a lot smaller, smarter on, like, the design behind how we talked about things. And, like, going into now more of, like, what are our consumer experience? How do they approach these. How do they talk about those components? As we started to look at like modifications of reservations or adding, you know, adding, adding somebody to a room and, and those pieces of things, the other items that we started to build in was like contextual awareness of where the user was in the experience, right? So if you're sitting on the sign in page, like EVA is looking at different things than if you're sitting on a property, right? So like understanding like where you're at in the experience. So like if you're on the forgot password page, like, hey, are you having trouble logging in? And like we've built in like more proactive. Yeah, proactive outreach, right. From. From EVA to try to generate that support, but also looking at like, okay, you're looking at these properties. What do we know about Laci? Right, we know Lacy likes five Star PROPERT in New York City, right. Like, how do we help take your historical shopping behavior and help to apply that to your current search? Right? And like helping build that experience based on, based on the data that we have on you. And again, I'm going to say a non creepy way, because I do think you've got to be mindful of like, we all know everyone has we expect, right? As consumers. Like, I expect when I call somewhere, you know, my order history, you know what I've done. Like, I don't want to repeat myself and like those types of things, but like, and I want you to use it in the right way but like, again, not in the like the creepy way.
B
Yeah, yeah, no, I like that personalization because it's almost like I will have a different experience of Eva Ava, however you want to say it than someone else using Engine, right? Like, because it's been kind of curated and optimized for me and I want that. I mean, I think about my ChatGPT instance whenever I'm communicating with ChatGPT and then I look over at my husband's instance and I'm like, the way ChatGPT talks to my husband is completely different than how it talks to me. And so it's really interesting and I love that idea of bringing that level of personalization into these chatbot interactions that you might have with different companies. So I think that's really cool.
A
Yeah. And we, you know, we work with travelers, right? So like, who are the business travelers, but also who are the administrators? Right. And so the experience is very different for the person who is, who is traveling versus the one who's actually managing kind of like the backend operations for the organization. So being able to identify again based on their role and their usage, like what problem are they likely looking to solve, helps us be more proactive in how we engage.
B
Yeah, that's great. So fast forward now. Almost, almost a year. I mean, I'm like skipping ahead a little bit. We're almost a year in since the first AI agent has been launched. What are you seeing results wise? I teased, I teased it up a little bit at the beginning of our episode, but tell me, I want to hear from you, like, what's the reception been like from customers? What progress has the organization had? Yeah, just initial results from these different levels of rollout.
A
Yeah, absolutely. So on the EVA side, right, we've seen that we're pacing towards close to a $2 million in savings annually. We've reduced average handle time for cases by 15%. We've improved productivity of our customer service reps by 10%. And we are really like CSAT scores are above 90% right now, which is extremely high for this industry. Usually benchmarks are around 83. So just again, continuing to see great progress. And as we add additional use cases, we're seeing more savings. Right. And the part of this is like it's, you know, I think when people talk about like savings of AI, you naturally assume like you're reducing headcount and you're, you know, cutting jobs. Like, we're not. Right. We look at this as like AI plus human components, but like, you know, back to like not our sexiest problem, but like the one that was the most operationally time consuming and expensive. And a friction point in the customer experience, like has freed up our actual support team to work on more higher value customer inquiries and needs and allowing us to like be more thoughtful there versus again the 300 cases of just canceling a flight or canceling a hotel. And you think about job satisfaction and those components, like, it's just a no brainer.
B
Yeah, yeah. I mean, you can feel it as a customer too, when you call into a center or you're chatting even online with a human agent. Right. If they're burnout, if they're not. And being able to remove some of the stuff that's sort of like clutter with these AI agents does allow that interaction between customer and employee to be so much stronger, so much better. So have you guys seen the job satisfaction score goes up?
A
Yeah, absolutely. Like our internal. What is it? An enps like, has continued to improve. Attrition is lower. Right. People are less likely to leave because they have more fulfillment too.
B
Wow.
A
So it's been all in all, like a really good, good opportunity for us. And again, as you think about career pathing and growth, right, you're giving more time for cross training, you're giving more time to do more of that higher value work for the business and for the customer.
B
Moving past the service use case, we talked a little bit about sales as well. Could you talk to me about how you're using these tools with your sales reps in addition to your customer service reps?
A
Absolutely. So at the same time we were kicking off EVA on the support side, we started initiatives on our sales side, specifically focused on our new business, outbound sales. And so a couple of the things that we did there were building agents for prospecting, and then we built some rep coaching tools as well as call prep and follow up. And so this as we've continued to grow, as we talked about, you know, reaching a thousand employees, we've been increasing our sales headcount, I think by 400% this year. So we're bringing a ton of new sales reps in. And, you know, one of the big bets we made as a business is like, how can we use AI to build, improve rep productivity? And in Q1, we were able to get a 67% lift in rep productivity, being able to really streamline, you know, reps. The amount of time reps were spending on research and prep versus like the time they spent actually in front, in front of customers. And a lot of that was driven based on our prospecting agent, which really worked to surface. Like, who are the most relevant accounts that we should be going after? How are they scored? How are they prioritized? Let's source the right Personas that we should talk to, talk to from that and actually serve that directly to the reps with the suggested personalization for outreach. One of the big things that I feel really passionate about here is in the world of AI SDR and all of that, we all see that and we feel that and we kind of hate it. And it's cringy. What we're doing is not replacing human judgment. We're augmenting it with better data and faster insights so that reps can be more productive in like, the decisions that they make and the actions that they take versus trying to automate the rep's job.
B
Yeah, yeah, we spoke with a woman, a couple might have been a year ago on one of our other podcasts where they're making like an AI person, like an AI rep that you can actually talk to. And like how I'm talking To you, we could engage. And while I don't want to say whether or not, like, that's the future where we're going, I hesitate with it because it just doesn't feel like super. I don't know, like, there's just like this uncanny valley there of, like, I don't know if I actually want to talk to you. Like, you're just AI. There's, like no emotional connection. It is interesting that there are a lot of solutions focused on this of, like, how do we replace reps when I just don't think we're there yet. I think we're still very much in this place of how do we augment people? Because it's still, you know, business will always be personal. It'll always be people want to buy interaction.
A
And there's a trust aspect to it.
B
Right.
A
And, like, you don't. I think so much of that still is Trust.
B
Yeah, 100%. I mean, to that point. Right. It's like if this AI tool has been optimized to. To sell. To sell me. Right. Like, the whole tool has been designed to sell to me, then I inherently feel like I can't trust what it's telling me versus, like a human where they're like, actually, you know, hey, this thing, maybe this isn't the best fit for you. Or like, genuinely, I'd be like, oh, I actually trust you now because you're being super honest with me. And I don't know that the AI would be programmed to be that honest. Right. Um, so, yeah, I think there is just like this. This gap there. But to be able to take these tools and support the sales rep, I think is so amazing and impressive because so much time is just spent in the, like, recording the call notes or looking up someone's information. And I know personally, as someone who sat on the side of sales demos, I actually don't want to see the 50 slide deck you have. I want the, like, 10 slides that are relevant to me. So if I can help you understand what's relevant to me, then I'm all for that.
A
Absolutely. And again, I think we expect that right now as consumers, like, we want that experience. And, like, we've now elevated, like, our buying experience, though, as businesses and sales teams. Like, if you're not. If you're not elevating your selling experience, you're going to miss. Miss that mark. Right. And, like, if I can save reps from having to go and like, re. Input data from a call into CRM, because CRM knows, because it listened to the Call, right? Like that's time savings where the rep can now spend more meaningful interactions on like writing that right follow up and making sure we're delivering on like the action items that came, came from that call versus like the, I'm going to call it like the back office task that you know, are still valuable and like need to be done but like can be done with support of technology. As we've been hiring, you know, all of these, all of these, you know, new, new reps coming in, right? Like being able to onboard them efficiently, right. So like being able to use call coaching and like call scoring and like helping streamline just even manager productivity and how we help support new hires and identify again like gaps earlier on just sets them up for more success too.
B
That's what I wanted to ask you about. Was this like coaching? The way that you're using AI for coaching, can you talk a little bit more about exactly what that means? So if someone's on a call then they get like an AI generated report that's sort of like, hey, here's some feedback of how you did.
A
Yeah, we've got a couple different mechanisms for coaching. So one of which is like actually having more like a simulated kind of call experience, right? So if I'm, if I'm trying to sell to Lacy, like I understand Lacy is, you know, she's my icp, she's my buyer at this company. Like I can go do a simulated role play with Lacie, right? Using CRM and like real data, but getting reps just comfortable in having those conversations, right. It's kind of, you know, the same way you'd role play with, you know, during an onboarding process with a manager or somebody else. Like they're doing it now with AI and like then getting a report back of that, right? Like, hey, you didn't have a value based opener or you missed, you know, bank qualification or like whatever comes back from, from that. So we have that more of that like onboarding coaching and like skill refinement. Then additionally within like our call recording we have scorecards set up and we have AI scorecards based on, you know, discovery calls to demo, calls to kickoffs that are looking at like, are we, you know, and again, I hate being like, are they following the script? Because it's not a script, right? But like are they hitting the right key details here and then looking at that scoring. But also managers are expected to score calls too and understanding like how are managers scoring, right? Do we have the right expectations across teams and how we're Looking at this, but then also being able to report back to reps, like, hey, here's where you should focus and work. Like, how are we seeing that increase? And measuring that over time too.
B
I love that role play scenario because I think it would allow people to have so much more practice. I can just keep practicing, I can keep getting better at it, and I can kind of do it in my own private scenario versus having to try and fail, try and fail in front of a live person or my manager. There's a lot of different applications for that besides just sales. I think about my mom works in contracting and she's trying to get her unlimited warrant. And part of that process is, you know, going through like an interview process of how would you handle XYZ scenario? How cool would it be if you had an AI tool that you could just practice those different scenarios with? Or there's so many educational applications of that as well with school, like, I'm becoming a lawyer. How would I handle XYZ scenario vs it? Just being a written thing that I answer. It can be an actual back and forth engagement. Seeing how I respond in real time, I really think that's cool. And I feel like we're just at the tip of the iceberg of how this can be applied across the organization.
A
And I think about, you know, like SDRs, right? Like, if you're an SDR, like what's one thing you have to be really, really good at? And it's like rejection, right? And it's, you know, it's probably, it's so bad to say, but it's like, it's blatant rejection on a phone call, right? And so like, how do you just start to get really comfortable with that kind of thing? And it's, you know, a lot of that is like, it's skill based training and like just going through those scenarios. And the thing that I like about like more of the AI prompt and like the role play is like, you don't know what you're gonna get, right? So it's not like, oh, I'm gonna like keep using the same thing and it's gonna be the same outcome each time and I'm just gonna get really good at just like the same thing. It's like we have it where you might get just a total wild card response or you get somebody who's more aggressive or, you know, you get, yeah, you know, somebody who's gonna challenge you. So like, outcomes are always different and like that is what they're gonna interact with day in and Day out. So just getting them really comfortable there.
B
100%. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, even from like a customer service rep position, that makes total sense. Like if I'm a customer service agent, being able to. Someone comes on the phone and they are hot and they are angry, how do I handle that? Someone comes on the phone, they're crying, how do I handle that? Like it would be. It's definitely a lot of different applications for it. So Molly, you have implemented several different layers now. There's several different use cases of agentic AI in the organization. Your team has, you know, implemented that. Your leadership has said, yes, we want to do this. There are a lot of companies that are not as quick as you guys have been. You know, they might have heard about agentic AI. Maybe they were at Dreamforce, Right. And they saw the rollout, but they are still not yet in implementation phase. They don't even, they don't have results. Right. What advice do you have? The leaders that are growing through what you guys went through about a year ago?
A
Yeah, I mean, I think it's simple. It's like stop planning and start doing right. Like at the end of the day, like just don't worry about it being perfect and a perfect strategy. Like worry about just picking one real problem and solving that super well. Right. Like for us, you know, it was setting, it was setting that like 14 day deadline. Right. And like shipping something that works and then just measuring everything and iterating. Like you're gonna learn more if you say like, okay, 30 day deadline, we're gonna get through this. Like it's this use case. We're gonna put a tiger team together and knock it out. You're gonna learn more In 30 days of like true, real implementation than you're going to in six month of months of planning. And let's be honest, in six months of planning, the tech is gonna change 10 times over that like your planning is going to continue to be wrong. Right. And like more things are gonna come out and like you're just never gonna get anywhere because you're gonna be stuck on just trying to get somewhere.
B
Yeah, that's so true. That's so true. So Molly, getting into the people side of this, you mentioned earlier, it's human plus AI and I, I love echoing that. I think it's so true. What was it like initially with your actual teams that were using this tech and implementing it out the gate like this, you know, in November, December. What was your, what were your team's responses initially? Were people like super eager? Was There a mix, was there fear? And now that you guys have sort of like rolled this out, what does. How does a team responding?
A
Yeah, absolutely. I think, you know, one of my big. I'm laughing because I'm like, I think one of my biggest lessons on this is like I had, I had it all wrong on like how adoption would go, right? And I think, you know, we had really. Yeah. And I'll do. Yeah. So on. On the service side, adoption went really well, right? Like they're very eager. Like I think the value prop of like, wow, I don't have to deal with these tickets anymore. Like this makes tons of sense. We, you know, have copilot. We rolled out copilots. Like the. Just the efficiency gains in like their day to day were just so, just obvious for them that it was like, this is great, like I'm leaning in. This is awesome. Right. On the sales side though, which like in my, my assumption was like they were going to be the more like, let's go. This is awesome. Willing to adapt. Like, it was very much like, I wouldn't say resistance. It was almost like, oh, that's nice. I'm gonna keep doing what I'm doing kind of thing, right? And like I think, and I think part of it was like it wasn't, it wasn't optional on the service side, right. Like it was required and it was just like built into how, how the experience works. And on the sales side it was more like it was optional, right? Like, do you want to use these tools? Do you like the call recording and all that stuff? Like, and the onboarding stuff? Like, yeah, they had to use that but like the prospecting features and like some more of like those types of copilots, like weren't. We weren't saying you have to use this, right? And like it's part of your job. Like we kind of like let them decide what they wanted to do. And so I think a couple of the things that helped kind of like I'm going to say like turn, turn the ship around on this that I learned is you have to like build transparency in this a little bit, right? And like with the sales team there were, there were kind of two, two fold lessons that I learned. One of which is like we have to show people exactly like how the AI works, right? To the point that like it was like actually opening up the prompt and going through the prompt with the sales team, right. Like, and it wasn't just like, hey, trust me, like, this is what it's doing. It's like this is exactly what it's doing. And it's, you know, one of those things, like, I don't actually want to know how the sausage is made, but, like, this is a scenario where they didn't need to know, like, how the sausage was made to build their trust in adopting it, right? And so we went through, like, the reasoning they understood. Like, we showed them, like, hey, if it's a bad output, right, and it doesn't have this confidence rating, like, we don't give it to you, right? But, like, we're only giving you the things that we're competent in. And so that was a big piece that, like, we really had to, like, hit home on. Like, how does this work and, like, what is this doing and why? And I think some of that was just, like, the trust that we understood, like, what they were doing too, right? So, like, somebody coming in and being like, hey, Lacey, like, I can help you do your job better, but I don't do your job is a little bit of like. Like a little bit of like a, hey, let's try this approach again too. So, like, we also had to make it obvious from day one, right? Like, so 20 minutes learning a new tool versus, like, saving five minutes. Like, that adoption curve, like, had to be a lot faster versus, like, if I can save you two hours of research in five minutes, like, adoption will be immediate, even if maybe it's not as like, good as they think it's going to be. Like, their quicker ROI was there. So we did do some, like, refractoring of like, our scoring and like, how quick and how easy and like, where we had it run automatically versus, like, they could manually run. So, like, lesson one was like, showing not telling and just continuing there. Lesson two was find people with influence and let them be your advocates for this. You know, I. I do not have. I. Right. I am not an influencer. And like, that is very clear of a weakness that I fully own. I am not going to rally the troops. And so it was really like, look for who that, like, salesperson is. That is that influential person who can help. And the good news is, is most salespeople are influential because they're sellers and get them to really help to advocate for you. I think one of the things that we fail at is we tend to pick the top seller as the, like, person that you put as that influence. They're going to be your worst adopters because they already know what works and what they're doing is working for them. So getting them to try to change is Going to be, they will be, they will be your resistance people more, more often than not. So like don't go, don't go directly to the top, right? Like look in that middle and it's usually like that person who like people naturally trust and like go to for advice, they're like have genuine curiosity, like they're willing to experiment, right. But like they tend to be your mid level performers who like just want to get better too but not the ones that like are your top performers that you're, they're not going to rock their boat because they are doing okay right now. And so I think for us it was like find those people, get them in early, right? Give them some level of incentive too to get in early. Like this is one of the things that I think is like really important is like, hey, we're going to try something, it may or may not work and if it doesn't work, we're not going to punish you for trying. Right? So figure out if there's some quota relief or something like that you can do there because at the end of the day you don't know, right. Especially while you're moving quick and trying to find it out. So I think those were really big things to drive for. Other things that we've now done is we shout out the wins a lot more too. Like okay, great, we built this efficiency but we're still talking about, hey, this was an AI sourced account that closed. Way to go. And look what they learned. And look at when we talk about how we improve velocity and like where that's demonstrated, like we know based on like the productivity savings, like it's there but like we're continuously iterating that to keep driving adoption.
B
Yeah, yeah, that makes a lot of sense too that you're sharing sort of the story of the win, not just the stat. Because if I hear X number of percent productivity gained, like as a employee I might be like cool, what does that mean? But to actually have a place where I'm seeing like this account, oh, I know that logo closed from this thing. Like that is the only way that it's going to concretely sit in people's brains that this actually works and that this is doing something that I might be interested in and a tool that I actually want to work into my workflows. I love what you shared about sellers being way more ultra critical of the tool and wanting to understand. Makes sense. It makes sense though that they'd be like, no, I'm about to get on the phone with someone, I Need to trust this is actually the thing they care about. Because I don't want to flop on the phone and be like. And say something that's completely wrong. So it makes sense that they want the under the hood look at how this research is being done and what the prompt is. But I imagine that that's not. That's not as easy, though, as, like, as just showing it to them. Right. Because you could pull up an AI agent right now and you could share it with me, and if I don't have the knowledge and understanding of how it works, I would still not trust it because I'd be like, I still don't get what you're doing. So was there, like, a level of education you had to do besides just showing under the hood how it worked? But actually, like, here's what an AI agent is.
A
Yep.
B
Here's how prep engineering works. Like, what did that education process look like for your team?
A
Yeah, absolutely. And I. I laugh and smile because, like, it is continuous education. Right. And, like, we are constant. We are constantly doing this too, because, like, things keep refining and keep changing and, like, evolving here. And, you know, it's like, what is. You know, you start with what is a prompt. And I chuckled when we were talking about this. More of the fact of, like, one of the things that, like, as part of our sales motion that our team does is they go to a company's website, right? And they're looking for, like, key indicators that this company might travel. And so that is, like, what they're taught to do as they're prospecting. Well, we have an agent that, like, goes and does that automatically, right? So, like, we know what the keywords are. We've sat in the motion. Like, we have the agent go look at the company website and get back, like, a score. And then the deductive reasoning of, like, why do we think company ABC travels? Well, here's what we see in the job description. Here's what we see, like, on social media about them hosting these events, right? And, like, it's very prescriptive, like, coming back. And so I still laugh because, like, it was, let's put the person against the robot type of thing. Because it was like, they were still going to the website. And I was like, why? Why are you still going to the website? Like, what don't you trust, you know, like, about what's coming back from the AI? And it was like, I just. I need to do it myself, you know? And it was like, we had to get to the point of, like, yep, do it Yourself and come back and like, let's look at how long did it take for you to go do this. Okay. It took you seven minutes, right? Okay. We had the AI do this. Like, here's how much more it actually captured in 30 seconds versus, like the seven minutes that you spent here. And so, like, we had to kind of like do more of that. Like, hey, like, you're going to get to the same outcome faster doing this. But then on the balance, like, the part that, like, will get you is, like, it's not always going to be perfect, right? So, like, we did still have to set, like, those expectations. Again, like human reasoning, like, you've got to like, actually read through before, like, give it a sniff test a little bit too. Right? Especially as you pointed out, like, they're going to get on the phone and talk to somebody. So, like, they want some level of accuracy. And that's where we've like built in more feedback loops and like, if AI comes back and like hallucinates, right. Like, we want to have that redundancy tracking and like QA on top of that too, to just make sure we're giving the best possible results. Because I would rather give no result for something than give something that was not close to accurate.
B
When we talk about quality control, I think, I think there's going to be more conversations about this in the future. Like, I just, I think it's becoming a huge component of these AI rollouts is that there is always going to be a level of risk that you accept. And it's just true with humans. Like, not, I mess up, everyone messes up. You know, sales rep goes to a website, makes an assumption, ends up being wrong. Like, but we, we are less forgiving of technology than we are of human mistakes. And so this, like, quality control conversation, I think is one that's, that is important because there is, there has to be a level of risk tolerance. You have to accept that there will be some mistakes. But it's like each company needs to decide within themselves what is that level, what's the risk I'm willing to take. So how did you guys kind of determine that? You said there's an accuracy scoring. How do you determine. How do you even come up with the accuracy algorithm of whether or not this is correct or not?
A
I'm going to say you don't. You come up with something and you monitor it and you manage it. You are still deciding things. And I think a couple of the things that we, I'd say did really well when it came to quality Control especially a lot of these are customer facing, right? So like back to risk tolerance. Like my risk tolerance is a lot lower on something that's like going in front of a customer than it is potentially on something that's like back end that like I know I have a little more like luxury and flexibility with. But like quality control like has to start in design, right? It can't be at the point of inspection. Like so when we thought about this it was like what are the guardrails we're putting in our workflows, right? Like especially like with Eva back to her, like she can only access certain data, right? She can only make certain types of changes. Like she has to escalate when confidence drops below a threshold. Like she doesn't sit in analysis paralysis. Like we built that design with that quality control in mind versus like going out and then being like, ah, crap, we gotta like go back and like figure out when she's wrong going rogue, right? And then the other pieces of this is like the first hundred interactions, right? Had manual human review. We're on a 10% ongoing. We actually have. I'm going to laugh when I say this, but like we have AI checking AI on our, on our pieces to help like just drive like more of those like checks too. But like we're still doing manual review and like I hope that we continue to always do manual review and like maybe that'll drop lower than 10% when we have more of that confidence. But like again, tech is always changing. Things are always changing. Like we want that alerting, right? And that's where like the CSAT and like these metrics are so important because they also give us signal if something starts to seem off as well so we can catch issues faster. And you know, the other thing is like the perfect automation doesn't exist, right? Like I think just like being okay with like that and instead like optimizing for consistently good outcomes versus like perfect ones is like another really important thing to keep, keep top of mind as you're doing this design. And like sometimes that means like AI is going to err on the side of caution and like escalate more than necessary. But like for us that's better than a bad customer experience because like again, that's going to. The bad customer experience is going to cost us more.
B
Yeah. Oh, for sure, for sure. That makes total sense. Part of building a lot of these like AI agents and these tools that you guys, companies investing in is actually selecting companies to work with partners that do this, right? But also like what program you're going to use, right? Like, are you going to use ChatGPT as the basis of this? Are you going to use Claude? Like, what, what company you're going to go with that's going to help you develop out your LLMs, right? Or I guess you could go the extra step and actually make your own LLM, which I know some companies have done, which is just like a huge undertaking and not something I would recommend to smaller organizations, for sure. So when I think about this though, and I'm like, okay, cool, we've made these AI agents, we made Ava Eva, we've started to invest in all this stuff, but now there's like this underlying structure that is not your company. It's. Right, it's, it's a chatgpt, it's a cloud, it's, it's a whatever, right? It's maybe it's Google. I get concerned about that because I think about like, oh, well, what if ChatGPT quote unquote fails? I don't think it's going to fail, but like, what if something underneath there doesn't end up working or they're not moving as fast in innovation as a different company? And now I built so many AI agents that are based off this, this tool. Like, what happens if this doesn't work out? And so I do get concerned about that. I mean, this is something, though, that's not, it's not new. Like, this is a technology problem. Anytime you invest in new technology, it's possible that the underlying framework might break or not work anymore. But how are you kind of thinking about the risk associated with investing in just like one algorithm that's going to be that source of truth for you moving forward?
A
It's a great question. Right. And you know, I have a paid personal subscription to Claude as well as ChatGPT and I couldn't tell you why I use one without the one over the other when I'm doing something. But I have some, some preference to one versus the other based on what I'm doing. And like, I don't know, I couldn't even tell you what that is. But I think to your question, like, platform lock in is like a true concern, right? Like, it's, there's like a bigger risk to trying to like hedge too much and like ending up with like a Frankenstack. Right. And so from the engine side, we deliberately chose to like go deeper with fewer platforms versus like being spread across too many. But with that, you know, we use Salesforce and Agent Force and like we're betting on one ecosystem, right? So like, that's the ecosystem, not just the AI capabilities, but then we've got, you know, our cloud and our OpenAI but knowing, like, if they change, let's say, their pricing tomorrow, we can swap in and out our models the way we need to. And I think one of like the core things in our design here is like, we're not having to rebuild all our integrations and all our workflows because of how we took more of that ecosystem approach on building on top of Salesforce, but we have these abstraction layers now that we can leverage. We don't hard code specific AI models into our workflows. We have more of interfaces that sit underneath that support that underlying technology. It's definitely more work up front, right. And like it was a cognizant design decision that we made to give us that flexibility later on because otherwise, like, if we have to start over, like, we essentially have to rebuild. Right. And so like, when we think about modularization and like building for scale, like, that was super important to us. And you know, we. I'll be. Let's talk about the hard lessons we learned, right? We learned that lesson the hard way with eva. Initially, we did everything as like one monolithic agent. And then when we wanted to start adding those new capabilities, right, we had to do a little bit of rebuilding. So now we've got modular components that we can mix and match. The nice part about that is, like, as we expand EVA outside of just our main travel platform and actually look at more of our backend for our partners and suppliers, we can actually start to mix and match those capabilities versus starting over from scratch, which definitely helps too. But like, I think the philosophy with AI is like, assume everything's going to change and like go in probably with. With that assumption, right? Like, models are going to get better, new vendors are going to come out like business. I mean, business requirements are going to change. Like, make sure your back end can adapt and like, think about like how you build more like plug and Play and like, you know, we've invested in like APIs and like data pipelines that have more openings to connect to different platforms and systems versus locking us in as well so that again, we don't have to touch core infrastructure when we want to make these adjustments.
B
That's really smart. And are you. This might be, I don't know, a question for you personally or just how broadly Engine is thinking about this, but how do you track there's this new AI tool? Let's try it out. Or there's this new startup, this new vendor that could do something really, really cool. How are you actually evaluating, like, whether or not that's hype or whether or not that's something that I should pursue. Are you personally just experimenting with stuff all the time? I know personally I am constantly new AI tools out, I'm over there trying it out. Oh, it didn't work. Moving on to the next thing. But it also is really hard and it can be a bit distracting. And I know we've made investments in AI tools that we thought would help us in certain ways that ended up just not working out at all. Or fast forward two weeks and the platform we were already using now offers the same function and you're like, well, now I invested in this thing that I shouldn't, shouldn't have done that. So yeah, I'm just kind of wondering how you're evaluating when to step in and say, yeah, let's use that personally. And then just like from a business standpoint, yeah, it's.
A
I mean, geez, this, like this landscape of tech is crazy, right? And like, I think just we've looked at like, you know, Scott Breaker has like the Martech whatever. It's probably like a hundred thousand right now. And like now you look at it like a AIs just kick that one to the curb. Because there's just so much happening all the time, right? Like every week there's a new AI first, you know, startup that's revolutionizing like this piece of the rev stack. And when it gets down to it, like, re. You know, realistically, like these vendors offer about 95% of the same functionality, right? And there's like this like, you know, probably like niche 5, 5%. And so to your point, it's like, and I, I'm a tech snob, right? Like, I've got RevTech review. Like, I love looking at like, what's new on the market. But like, the distraction is real, right? Like, you have to make sure that you are moving forward the right way and like not pivoting off of what you talked about back to like the, like, we wouldn't have been able to launch in 14 days if we kept trying to like, touch everything new that came into the market. And so for me, it's like, before we like, can start something new, you have to explain like, what we're going to stop doing or like what we're going to consolidate too and like, really make, make that case, right? The one thing that I do appreciate about the market right now that I would Say like, wasn't probably the case three years ago is like most of these places offer free trials, right? Or they have like quick demo accounts. Like so. And this would be my warning to anyone. Like if you are buying an AI solution or considering buying an AI solution, like if you're not running a pilot on it, like you're proudly going to get hosed. Like you should full stop, like put your, they've got to put their money where their mouth is when it comes to the tech and like truly be able to pilot it because that is the only way you're going to truly know if it works for your business and really be able to evaluate that on, onto the market. And so that's been one of probably like my favorite things about this is like, oh, I can go look at, you know, an N8N or something like that and be like, let me go, just give it a try, right? And like see can it do what I need to do. And like there's so much more like self service on that. I'd say the other big thing though that has shifted in like our, the way that I buy is like, it's not just the tool, it's now the partner, right? So back to like, yeah, we're buying from people, right? Like the best vendors are the ones that are going to be like the extension of our team. They're going to understand our business, they're going to be responsive when things break. They're going to, they're going to be builders with you, right? And like really invest in your success because like that's what's going to, in my opinion, it's not going to be the tech that separates like the winners and the losers in this space because like the tech is now table stakes. It's going to be like the relationship and the business that is going to really like push, push this forward, right? Because like at the end of the day, like I'm looking at four call, you know, call analytics platforms. There's going to be feature parity and tech parity across all of them. It's which one's going to be the better partner.
B
Yep, yep. And it's not going to be the AI agent sales rep that you're talking to, right? It's going to be the real person that you can get on the phone and actually like have a, have a relationship built with them.
A
It's going to be the one that flew their implementation team to our office to like help do enablement and configuration and setup. And like is the one that wants to be at the table and the one that's pinging you when they're like, hey, look at what our other client built. You guys should consider doing this, like are that's how you're going to win in this vendor landscape. Obviously you have to have the best tech, which now is table stakes, which I think before maybe wasn't always the case, but now it's like you have to be the best partner.
B
Yeah, I love that. So I've talked a lot on this show about overhype with AI and I think I've dove pretty deep into the things that maybe aren't actually feasible. So I want to flip the question around a little bit to you and say, what's underhyped? What's something that you seeing that you've implemented, that you've been hands on with all this stuff that you're like, I can't believe these other companies aren't actually doing this yet.
A
Yeah, I'd say process intelligence is super under hyped right now. We're all focused on the sexy stuff like AI writing emails and analyzing calls. But if we can get AI to actually understand our processes and start to suggest optimizations there and like even like you know, at the top line, you know, level of like, oh hey, like you should try this or that, right? But like where this gets really powerful is like at the rep level of like hey Lacy, like your deal is stalled in stage three because you didn't send the specific piece of content like that the buyer like could really learn from at this moment. And like more of like that recommendation engine at like a more prescriptive level I think goes such a long way and then being able to like actually aggregate that up into like how do we optimize process? And like right now I think a lot of Revops teams are still doing process analysts manually, right? Like we're looking at dashboards and trying to spot patterns and like, let's be honest, like CRM reporting and like even BI reporting really sucks at this, right? Like even like I'm sorry to be crass but like even Google Analytics, like when you look at like your website journey orchestration, like it still doesn't really give you that prescription and like help you visualize the experience in the right way. So I think from my standpoint, if we can get AI doing continuous analysis and recommendations of patterns and insights, that's going to help change the revenue engine. And that's where I see some tools on the market starting on this. But it's really, how do we do this at scale and embedded at the level you need it to.
B
Yeah. Oh, I love that. That's great. So anyone listening that wants a startup idea, steal that one.
A
Yeah. Build that for me. Happy to give you. Give you insights.
B
Molly, this has been fantastic. I got one thing I'm going to do. I'm going to throw this over to Rose, who's got our lightning round questions. This is just a quick round of short questions for you to answer as fast as you can and we'll hold you to that. If you start answering too long, we're going to pause you and make you stay with the lightning round.
C
Okay, first lightning round question. What's a common assumption about AI or RevTech that you're actively pushing back on.
A
Right now that is going to replace people? People are obsessed with headcount reduction and cost savings, but, like, that's missing the point entirely. Totally.
B
Okay, go deeper. I actually want you to go deeper.
A
Yeah. So, yeah. So I think, like, biggest assumption like that. I think, you know, I'm not actually fighting this at Engine, but I think I see a lot of my peers fighting is like, how they use AI to replace, you know, headcount. Like, we're all obsessed with OPEX and headcount reduction and cost savings, but, like, that's not the point of what we're trying to do here with AI. Right. Like, the real value is like, how do you make your existing people more effective? Right. Our customer service team's not smaller because of eva. They're handling more complex issues. They're building deeper relationships. Our sales team's not getting replaced by AI. They're closing more deals because they're spending more time on strategy and engagement versus research. It's like that pushback of how many people's rules can we eliminate with AI? I think the better question here is how can we help our people do their best work? And I think if you frame it that way, like AI is a growth enabler, not a cost cutting exercise. So we've got to change that perspective.
B
Mic drop. That was amazing.
A
It was not a lightning answer.
C
No, that was fantastic. All right, number two, when you think about the work you're most proud of this year, what stands out?
A
Yeah, I think just in the short time that I've been at Engine, just in eight months. Right. Is just how much we've changed the culture around AI. Even knowing, like, we came in to something that was so open to digital transformation, it still was a little mysterious and not as broadly adopted. And now it truly is part of our culture. And how we operate and in our daily work, we've got office hours, we've got slack channels. We have really not just implemented AI, but we've democratized it and we talk about it and we share our wins and we also create an environment where it's really like building like an AI literate organization, regardless of role, of just being able to let anyone at any role continue to learn more from each other.
C
That's amazing. All right, number three, what's one mistake or false start you've learned the most from in the past six months?
A
Assuming adoption would be a lot easier than it actually was, right? So I thought like, I thought if we just like showed people what we could do, the value, they'd be like, all in, right? Like, even if I'm so showing you I'm saving you 10 hours a day, like that wasn't good enough. So just really still investing in the change management. I think my lesson was like, successful AI implementation is like 70% change management, 30% the tech. So like even with the best AI and tech in the world, like if people don't trust it, you're not going to get the adoption.
C
Trust and change management have been huge overarching themes. I feel like of our past few interviews, it's so interesting. I'm not seeing that as much, at least on my LinkedIn feed. I feel like it is more sexy, flashy AI conversations or maybe some like fear mongering. But yeah, I love that conversation a lot.
A
I think we're going to see this world where like enablement is going to be such a big, big push and like true like digital transformation enablement kind of like resources and instructional design and like that type of like management around this is going to be really interesting.
C
Hey, maybe we'll bring you back for a part two Molly, if that.
A
I gotta figure that one out. Cause I still suck at the enablement side of things.
C
All right, last lightning round question. We ask this to every guest that comes on the show. What's one experience you've had recently as a customer that left you impressed?
A
Yeah, absolutely. So now I'm like obsessed with chatbots, right? And like it's my favorite thing now that we built EVA to mess with and so recently bought shoes from an online retailer. And like when I contacted support, like they knew my recent purchase history, right? Like I had already kind of been logged in. So it's like, oh, yep, this is the, this is what you bought. Like what do you want to do with it, right? Is it like, okay, I need to process a return, right? So it gave me those prompts because it already knew. And, like, I didn't even have to explain the problem, right? I didn't have to go in and be like, hey, I bought these shoes. And it's like, what's your name? What's this? Blah, blah, blah, right? It was like, hey, Molly, we know you're here. We know you just made this purchase. Like, is there an issue with this purchase? Do you need to do a return? Like, let's just walk through that. They just knew, right? And I think from, like, an experience standpoint and a customer expectation, it's like, I expect you to know, right? Like, how did you just make that so easy on me?
C
What company is this?
A
It was American Eagle, actually. So. Which was, like, super impressive.
B
Shout out. American Eagle. Wow.
C
So cool.
A
Yeah.
C
Okay, well, that concludes the lightning round. Thank you, Molly.
A
Yeah.
B
All right, Molly. Well, thank you. This has been so much fun. Where can listeners find you? And where can they follow along with Engine's journey as you guys continue to invest more in technology and grow as it sounds like you guys are expanding.
A
Yeah. Find me on LinkedIn. Pretty active there. And Injun. We're continuing to share what we're doing on social media as well. And check out ingen.com, especially if you've got a business trip coming up, would love to help you travel.
B
I'm literally planning my dreamforce trip using enjin.com, so I'm excited.
A
We got you, Lacy.
B
Awesome. All right, Molly, thanks so much.
A
Take care.
Podcast: Experts of Experience
Host: Lacey Peace (Mission.org), produced by Rose Shocker
Guest: Molly Bodensteiner, SVP Operations, Enjin
Air Date: September 24, 2025
This episode of Experts of Experience delves into how Enjin, a fast-growing business travel platform, achieved remarkable gains in customer service and sales productivity by launching an AI agent in just 14 days. The conversation, driven by host Lacey Peace with producer Rose Shocker and guest Molly Bodensteiner, explores practical strategies for implementing AI, the critical importance of "ruthless prioritization," change management, the value of human-plus-AI models, and the myth that AI is just for reducing headcount. The episode is rich with actionable insights, real results, and a vibrant discussion on how to bridge the gap between planning and execution in AI transformations.
Stop thinking of AI as just an OPEX reducer. Primary value is in making existing teams more effective, not simply reducing headcount.
“We're all obsessed with OPEX and headcount reduction and cost savings. But that's not the point of what we're trying to do here with AI. Right. The real value is how do you make your existing people more effective?”
— Molly, [00:00]
AI as a growth enabler, not a cost-cutting exercise.
“AI is a growth enabler, not a cost cutting exercise. So we've got to change that perspective.”
— Molly, [00:39]; [64:28]
Enjin's first AI agent, EVA, was launched in 14 days, focused exclusively on automating hotel cancellations—300 requests per day.
Stats after implementation:
Quote:
“It might not have been our sexiest problem, or even the most technically interesting, but when we look at the volume, right, 300 cases daily, like it's costing our team a ton in productivity as well as just customer experience.”
— Molly, [14:51]
Lesson: Choose the highest-leverage, least-complicated use case and execute ruthlessly.
“Ruthless prioritization. So picking one thing and sticking with it ruthlessly.”
— Lacey, summarizing Molly, [02:30]
Avoid “Frankenstacking,” or piling up too many disconnected tools and platforms.
“That Frankenstack word is this idea that you've got 20 different tools trying to band aid solutions together.”
— Lacey, [06:10]
“We've got this huge list of ideas that almost paralyzes us... Which is why I loved our conversation with Molly Bodensteiner today... ruthless prioritization.”
— Lacey, [02:09]
Transparent Communication: Letting customers know they're interacting with AI built trust.
“We're upfront with customers. You're interacting with AI, Right. I mean, let's be honest, as consumers, we already kind of know that anyway in most situations. But being transparent and building that trust, I think was things that we learned through those feedback loops.”
— Molly, [19:21]
Seamless Escalation & Contextual Handoffs: EVA knows when to escalate to a human, ensuring customers never repeat themselves.
“We don't let her struggle through complex scenarios. We make sure she knows the right handoff, but then within that handoff, we have all of that context shifting.”
— Molly, [20:00]
Nearly $2M annual savings
15% reduction in case handle time
10% improvement in service rep productivity
67% increase in sales rep efficiency
CSAT >90% (industry norm ~83%)
Improved job satisfaction and reduced attrition
Quote:
“We've improved productivity of our customer service reps by 10%. And we are really like CSAT scores are above 90% right now, which is extremely high for this industry.”
— Molly, [25:43]
Quote:
“Our internal ... enps has continued to improve. Attrition is lower.”
— Molly, [27:28]
Tools Built for Sales:
AI-augmented prospecting to surface and prioritize accounts
Rep coaching, onboarding, and call simulation with actionable feedback
Quote:
“What we're doing is not replacing human judgment. We're augmenting it with better data and faster insights so that reps can be more productive.”
— Molly, [29:24]
Simulated roleplay for sales and service reps: Agents can safely learn from varied, unpredictable AI-generated scenarios, benefiting onboarding and skill growth.
Adoption Is Not Automatic:
Service teams were eager; sales teams were skeptical and required transparency (“show, not tell”), under-the-hood demos, and influential peer advocates.
“I had it all wrong on how adoption would go... On the sales side... it was almost like, oh, that's nice, I'm gonna keep doing what I'm doing.”
— Molly, [38:37]
70% Change Management, 30% Tech:
“Successful AI implementation is like 70% change management, 30% the tech. So even with the best AI and tech in the world, if people don't trust it, you're not going to get the adoption.”
— Molly, [65:32]
Tips for Adoption:
100% manual review for initial AI interactions, then 10% sampling + ongoing monitoring
AI checks AI for additional redundancy
Quote:
“Quality control has to start in design, right? It can't be at the point of inspection.”
— Molly, [49:29]
Emphasize “good enough” and safe escalation over unreachable perfection
Go deep with fewer platforms (Salesforce ecosystem + abstraction layers), build modular, swappable backend integrations
Quote:
“Assume everything's going to change and go in probably with that assumption, right? ... We don't hard code specific AI models into our workflows. We have more of interfaces that sit underneath.”
— Molly, [53:10]
“It’s not so much tech that's going to differentiate you as a company. It's actually the people in your company.”
— Lacey, [06:10]
On ruthless prioritization:
“If we wouldn't have done that, we'd probably still be building eva, right? ... Focused on the good enough that we can learn and iterate ... With agents, there's no such thing as perfect.”
— Molly, [18:32]
On sales adoption resistance:
“I am not an influencer ... most salespeople are influential because they're sellers ... But the top sellers are going to be your worst adopters because ... they're not going to rock their boat.”
— Molly, [41:08]
On what’s underhyped:
“Process intelligence is super under hyped right now. ... Getting AI to actually understand our processes and start to suggest optimizations ... that's going to help change the revenue engine.”
— Molly, [61:13]
On cultural change:
“In just eight months ... how much we've changed the culture around AI ... we've democratized it and ... built an AI literate organization.”
— Molly, [64:39]
On the myth that AI replaces people:
“We're all obsessed with OPEX and headcount reduction and cost savings, but, like, that's missing the point entirely. ... The real value is: how do you make your existing people more effective?”
— Molly, [64:28]
The conversation is practical, candid, and rich with lived experience—not theoretical. Molly provides playbook-style, hard-won lessons, and both hosts keep the tone energetic, sometimes self-deprecating, and always relatable.
Enjin’s rapid AI journey is a living case study in the power of focus, action over perfection, transparent trust-building, and human-plus-AI synergy. Their story counters the narrative that AI is about automation-for-layoffs, instead showing it can prepare companies to grow, improve customer and employee experience, and drive meaningful culture change. Their core advice:
“Stop planning, start doing, and prioritize change management as much as technology.”
Shout out: American Eagle for delivering a standout, personalized support experience via chat—setting the bar for customer expectations in the AI era.