Federalist Radio Hour – “What’s Next In The War In Iran?”
Episode Date: March 3, 2026
Host: Matt Kittle
Guest: Jacob Olidor, Chief Research Officer & Director of American Security, America First Policy Institute
Episode Overview
In this episode, host Matt Kittle speaks with Jacob Olidor about the evolving state of the U.S.-Israeli joint military operation against Iran following a pivotal strike over the weekend. The discussion probes the motives and objectives behind American involvement, the prospects for regime change in Iran, coalition-building across allies, concerns of military escalation and American “boots on the ground,” and the broader geopolitical implications for U.S. policy vis-à-vis Russia, China, and the Middle East.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Objectives and Justification for the Iran Campaign
Timestamps: 01:18–05:44
-
Defining Clear Objectives:
- Jacob Olidor highlights that the president’s early Saturday speech signaled both a constitutional mandate (“Article 2, Section 2 duties … to protect the American people against threats”—[02:41]) and an intent to set conditions for Iranians to potentially reclaim self-determination.
- The administration is focused on direct threats to Americans and coalition partners, not nation-building or externally imposed regime change.
-
Successes of Initial Actions:
- The operation achieved rapid decimation of Iranian military leadership and key capabilities.
- Olidor notes the historic scope and coordination with Israel and vocal regional partners, as well as European readiness for defensive actions (“Europeans … targeting Iranian ballistic missile capabilities”—[04:54]).
2. U.S. Messaging and Divergent Narratives
Timestamps: 05:44–07:15
-
Ambiguity in Communication:
- Kittle points out confusion in the official messaging regarding motivations—preempting nuclear capability, regime change, or aligning with Israeli initiative.
- Olidor clarifies that the administration distinguishes itself from previous ones by understanding and confronting reality: “This is a president that knows what an adversary looks like and understands the threats to the American people…” ([07:18]).
-
Regime’s Threat Poses to U.S. & Allies:
- Iran’s longstanding rhetoric (“big Satan, little Satan”) underscores the consistent U.S. focus on direct security concerns.
3. Prospects for Regime Change and the Iranian People’s Role
Timestamps: 09:13–14:18
-
Readiness for Change:
- Both Kittle and Olidor discuss the popular discontent within Iran (“thousands came out in the streets and risked their lives in protest”—[09:20]).
- Olidor notes: “that is ultimately, for the Iranian people… not something for us to be [doing],” reinforcing that U.S. objectives are limited to threat elimination ([10:31]).
-
Diversity of Sentiment:
- While anti-regime sentiment is widespread, some Iranians still resent the U.S. more than the regime, making outcomes unpredictable.
- “It’s important not to overstate … or generalize too, about a country as large and diaspora community as diverse…” ([12:29]).
4. U.S. Political Reactions and the ‘America First’ Doctrine
Timestamps: 15:07–20:04
-
Domestic Divisions in Response:
- Kittle observes the “radical left” mourning the Ayatollah’s death, and splits on the right between hawkish celebration and skepticism among “America First” conservatives wary of new entanglements.
- Olidor frames the administration’s actions as correcting past missteps (notably Obama-era policies), insisting the president has been consistent in opposing Iranian nuclear armament since 2015.
-
Refocusing U.S. Priorities:
- The mission, per Olidor, is tightly focused: “The objective here is… in a very targeted, precise way alongside partners. So it’s not just our burden…” ([19:56]).
5. Iran’s Nuclear and Military Capabilities
Timestamps: 20:04–22:19
- Why Strike Again?
- Kittle asks, given last summer’s attacks, why is further action needed now?
- Olidor explains: “If we see evidence again that Iran is trying to do this [revive nuclear arms], we will respond again militarily.” ([20:54])
- Iran’s adaptability (e.g., drone shield strategy) makes complacency dangerous.
6. Coalition Building and Regional Dynamics
Timestamps: 22:19–27:15
-
Foundations & Evolution:
- Olidor credits previous Trump-era diplomatic moves (Abraham Accords, military command shifts) for laying groundwork.
- Iranian intransigence and the proliferation of regional threats (Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas) have pushed even former fence-sitters (Europe, Gulf states) into alignment.
-
European Involvement:
- Notably, the EU moves to sanction Iran and list the IRGC as a terror group reflect a rare consensus (“one issue that’s undoubtedly a consensus ... [is] the need to address the threats from Iran”—[26:25]).
7. Potential for Wider Middle East Conflict
Timestamps: 27:43–34:14
-
Sectarian and Political Cleavages:
- Kittle queries whether sectarian solidarity could lead to a unified anti-US/Israel front.
- Olidor sees the reverse: “We don’t appreciate enough that … even the Shia communities in the Middle East … are some of the victims of this regime’s terror” ([28:36]). Many populations in the region are now actively opposed to Iran’s influence.
-
Boots on the Ground:
- U.S. policy has deliberately left open the possibility, never ruling out any options—a key difference from previous administrations ([31:34]).
- Olidor does not anticipate a ground invasion imminently, given the operation's early success, but stresses readiness for all outcomes.
8. Legality of Executive Action and Congressional Response
Timestamps: 38:05–39:59
- Debate Over Presidential Authority:
- Kittle and Olidor reject claims of illegality, citing constitutional powers: “It’s his decision alone as commander in chief to protect the American people. That’s exclusively the objective here.” ([38:51])
- Olidor criticizes congressional “gratuitous” politicization during wartime.
9. Global Strategic Implications (Russia & China)
Timestamps: 39:59–42:41
- Impact on Adversaries:
- Olidor projects a “quick downstream effect” on Russia—loss of Iranian weapon support could shift the Ukraine war.
- China's regional ambitions are checked by the U.S. campaign’s success in undermining Iranian stability.
- “That supply line is now being cut off by our efforts … I think it’s very real that we will see an end to the Ukraine war … the first domino to fall.” ([40:53])
Notable Quotes and Memorable Moments
-
On the U.S. Objective:
“The president laid out… his fulfillment of his Article 2, Section 2 duties as president, as prescribed in the Constitution, to protect the American people against threats against them.”
— Jacob Olidor ([02:41]) -
On Regime Change:
“That's not the American people's job. That's not America's job. It is for you, Iran. But in completing… our objectives here... you will have that opportunity.”
— Jacob Olidor ([03:38]) -
On Iran’s Adaptability:
"Secretary Rubio mentioned ... this drone shield that Iranian... regime is thinking of. ... That's a whole new use of the drone warfare to kind of insulate them."
— Jacob Olidor ([21:50]) -
On U.S. Resolve:
“This is a president that knows what an adversary looks like and understands the threats to the American people and takes that action.”
— Jacob Olidor ([07:18]) -
On Congressional Criticism:
“It’s completely reckless and especially right now among Democrats, to be gratuitous to be going there.”
— Jacob Olidor ([38:51]) -
On Global Effects:
“That supply line is now being cut off by our efforts... I think it’s very real that we will see an end to the Ukraine war ... the first domino to fall.”
— Jacob Olidor ([40:53])
Timestamps for Key Segments
- Objective & justification for action: 02:29–05:44
- Confused U.S. messaging: 05:44–07:15
- Prospects for regime change in Iran: 09:13–14:18
- Coalition-building discussion: 22:19–27:15
- Discussion on U.S. ground troop potential: 31:34–34:14
- Debate on legality of strikes and executive powers: 38:05–39:59
- Russia/China global impact: 39:59–42:41
Tone and Takeaways
- The conversation is urgent, serious, and confident—asserting the necessity and precision of U.S. action.
- Both host and guest are frank about unknowns ahead but express a sense of historic change and opportunity in the Middle East.
- Strong themes of “America First,” operational pragmatism, and coalition-based international strategy run throughout.
- The dialogue reinforces trust in U.S. leadership and the resolve to protect “the American people,” while also signaling a shift in global power alignments.
For listeners (or non-listeners), this episode offers a comprehensive, policy-driven snapshot of the new U.S. engagement in the Middle East, emphasizing both tactical maneuvers and broader ideological stakes.
