Hank Smith (4:08)

As I heard those the five P's there, I thought I could improve in all of those. There's room for improvement there, John. I'm sure many of Our listeners know Dr. Holland, but there might be a few who don't. Do you have a bio?

John (4:23)

I do, and I first want to say that I was watching a wonderful documentary that is on BYUTV called Kirtland, America's Sacred Ground. One of the expert commentators that comes on is Dr. Holland. I was excited to see that he would join us on our podcast. I'm so excited. This is right off of the Harvard Divinity School website, but David Holland serves as the Bartlett professor of New England Church History at Harvard Divinity School. In July of 2024, he became the Associate Dean for faculty and academic affairs. His research focuses on on the intersecting theological commitments and cultural changes that shaped American life from the early 17th century to the late 19th. His first book is called Sacred Continuing Revelation and Canonical Restraint in Early America, was published by Oxford University Press in 2011. He has since published A brief Theological Introduction to the Book of Mormon and is an editor of the Oxford Handbook on On Seventh Day Adventism, which is now in press. His research has also appeared in New England Quarterly, Law and History Review, and in a variety of other scholarly collections, including a recent essay in Secularization and Religious Innovation in the Atlantic World by Oxford University Press. That's amazing, and we're just so thrilled to have you. Thanks for joining us.

Dr. David Holland (5:51)

Thank you. Glad to be part of the conversation.

Hank Smith (5:55)

How are things in Harvard?

Dr. David Holland (5:56)

One of the blessings of an academic life is the way the rhythms of the year play out. They kind of breathe in and breathe out as students graduate and new students arrive and we get the opportunity to encounter a whole new group of people that represent the thinking of their generation. We're just on the cusp of a new year and that's always an exciting time.

Hank Smith (6:19)

Wow. Yeah, it is. I tell my Friends sometimes listen, I go underwater in September. I don't come back up to breathe till December, and then I go down again and I'll come up next April.

Dr. David Holland (6:30)

Yeah, that's how it goes.

Hank Smith (6:32)

The rhythm of the year. I like that. We need to jump into these sections. They're so rich. I'm going to read from the Come Follow Me manual. It starts out beautifully. The bottom level of the jail in Liberty, Missouri, was known as the Dungeon. The walls were thick, the stone floor was cold and filthy. Food was scarce and rotten. And two narrow iron barred windows near the ceiling allowed for very little light. This is where Joseph Smith and a few others spent four frigid months during the winter of 1838 into 39. During this time, Joseph was constantly receiving news about the suffering of the Saints. The peace and optimism felt in Far west had lasted only a few months and. And now the saints were without a home, once again driven into the wilderness in search of yet another place to start over, this time with their prophet in prison. And yet, even in that miserable jail, knowledge from heaven came pouring down. Joseph's question, O God, where art thou? Was answered clearly and powerfully. Fear not, for God shall be with you forever and ever. With that beautiful start, David, how do we want to jump in here?

Dr. David Holland (7:46)

Maybe a little bit unorthodox, but I'd like to actually start a number of years before these sections begin, before even Joseph Smith was born, and go all the way back to the American Revolution. I should note for listeners that among the instructions that I received when getting the invitation to participate in this conversation was to lean into our own areas of interest and expertise. One of the examples was, if you're a historian, be a historian. So I'm going to be a historian for a minute.

Hank Smith (8:22)

Okay.

Dr. David Holland (8:23)

Because I want to invoke a particular line that comes from the late winter of 1776. Now a lot of your listeners will know this history. The American Revolution had begun in earnest, really, in the spring of 75, but had pitted two identifiable armies against each other by the summer of 76. George Washington's Continental army was being consistently trounced through those early months of the war. He was in despair. If you can sort of picture an army in retreat with one of the most powerful fighting forces in the world hot on their trail all the way through New York and down through Pennsylvania. Washington was lost. He didn't know if this effort could prevail. We have the benefit of hindsight. He obviously did not. To make matters worse, most of the men that were in his army were going to be finished with their contracts at the end of the year. So in late December, he's about to become a general without an army. All he has is basically a string of defeats and retreats to show for this effort. He has one last moment of resolve. I won't get too much into the weeds of the geography of the battle at that point, but suffice it to say he's facing an icy river and a dangerous foe on the other side of it and very few options. When he was obviously otherwise preoccupied with the logistics of running a war and leading an army, he thought it worth his time to give his troops some words of encouragement. He also had the humility to know that he was probably not the wordsmith to provide those. But he had a traveling writer with the troops by the name of Tom Paine, who had been so influential in kicking off the independence effort with his treatise Common Sense from a year earlier. He asked Paine to write something that could stiffen the resolve of these despairing soldiers. Most of us know the way it opens. These are the times that try men's souls. Reminds us not to be sunshine patriots, but to retain our principles even in those winter months. But he says something there in that opening that I often think about when I encounter these sections. He said, heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods. It would be rare indeed, if so great a gift as liberty did not come at a steep price. That's a paraphrase. What Payne is saying is the things that are of great value often come at steep cost. He was pointing out to the army that if they really thought that liberty was something worth striving for, they should not be surprised that it took them into the depths of despair to ultimately attain it. I think about that when I think about this series of sections which have been so valuable, so meaningful, so moving, so redemptive for me personally in some pretty difficult times, and they came at a very, very high price, that there is a commensurability between the power of the passages and the depth of the darkness from which they emerged. I don't pretend to know all the ways in which God calculates those prices and that cost. But I do know enough from history and from my own personal experience that sometimes we come to know him in ways that cannot be acquired other than in those deepest, darkest recesses of our own need. You see that happening in these passages for Joseph, I'm grateful that we have them recorded so that we can learn from his experience as well as our own. I said at the outset that one of the striking things about these passages is that they seem to speak to such a universal human need. And it's striking to me that perhaps the oldest book in the Hebrew Bible is Job, which is referenced in this section. It's on the same topic. You could make the case that our earliest scripture is a testifier to the reality that from the beginning of time human beings have always found themselves in these moments. Even good, noble, faithful human beings, which the book of Job takes pains to characterize Job as. That's been a recurring preoccupation for men and women from time immemorial. Think about. St. Augustine wrestles with the same question repeatedly all the way up to Rabbi Harold Kushner, who wrote a best selling book a couple of decades ago called why Bad Things Happen to Good People. Everything from this deeply ancient poetry of Job to the best selling lists of our contemporary moment are grappling with this question, why Bad Things Happen to good people. Here we open up in section 121 with Joseph Smith wrestling with the same question. From a purely aesthetic point of view, from a purely literary point of view, it's striking to me that these moments evoke some of the most beautiful language in Scripture. I was reading through the Book of Job recently in anticipation of this conversation and was struck again and again by the majesty and beauty of his anguish and of his searching and of his determination to persist, including going so far as to creating this beautiful poetry about the beauty of death compared to the pain that he's living. He goes into some pretty extreme places. That's true of these passages as well, that Joseph is capable obviously of beautiful language. But there's vividness here from a purely literary point of view that I think exceeds most of his other language. He creates these images of God's pavilion. He talks about lambs being stalked by ravenous wolves. He talks about being in the deep billowing surge. He has this beautiful metaphor in section 123 about large ships and small helms and turning into the wind and the waves. He talks about shackles and fetters and the puny arm of man compared to the mighty Missouri River. This is an imagery, this is an evocative expression that can only come out when those deepest heartstrings are being plucked by the urgency of despair, sometimes, at least of some suffering. If you just wanted to measure it on purely aesthetic grounds, you could come back to Tom Paine's line that heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods. That if the beauty of this prophetic declaration is of great worth. It's not surprising that it came at great cost.

John (16:22)

That's a great introduction. When I think about this, it wasn't just Joseph. I'm hurting, I'm suffering. It's my people are out there. I'm hearing reports and I can't do anything. That question, how long? I'm not doubting God's existence, but what is the reason for this prolonged suffering? This is not doing anybody any good. But that question, how long? I noticed that Isaiah asks that when he gets his call. He's basically told that your mission won't go well. And Isaiah says, how long? And the Lord says, until the earth is wasted without inhabitant, or something like that. Alma and Amulek are in prison. How long? The agony of waiting and knowing your people are suffering and you can't do anything about it. A lot of times we talk about Emma's comment about Joseph, who could not dictate a well worded letter or write a well worded letter, but it just seems like he grew and he learned. When we see this language, we see a different Joseph.

Hank Smith (17:34)

I think most of our listeners have probably heard of this BYU speech. It's from Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, Lessons from Liberty. Yeah, Liberty Jail. He says, every one of us, in one way or another, great or small, dramatic or incidental, is going to spend a little time in Liberty Jail, spiritually speaking. Then he says this. This is what David just said. You can have sacred, revelatory, profoundly instructive experience with the Lord in the most miserable experiences of your life in the worst settings, while enduring the most painful injustices when facing the most insurmountable odds. Reminds me of Washington and opposition you have ever faced. A great thing to add to your study this week would be this BYU speech, Lessons from Liberty Jail. Every one of us is going to spend a little time in Liberty Jail.

Dr. David Holland (18:32)

That's the message of this section and the message of the standard works generally, I think, because from beginning to end they seem to witness to that effect. It's not always our tagline on the advertisements or the publicity material we put out there. Come and be assured that you'll have moments of suffering.

Hank Smith (18:56)

A message from the Church?

Dr. David Holland (18:58)

Exactly. That's probably not straight out of Madison Avenue, but it is the message of Scripture. I know it to be true. The Lord gives us some principles to guide us through those moments again and again. I'm not sure that those are articulated any more clearly anywhere in our canon than they are in these sections. I noted at the outset that one of the things he calls us to is perspective. He reminds Joseph that he still has friends. We know from multiple sources how important friendship was to Joseph. That was of central importance not only to his own sense of life's enjoyment and survivability, but also to a sense of its theological significance. He said friendship is one of the grand principles of the faith. The sociality that exists among us here will exist among us there. It is an eternal principle. When God says to Joseph, thy friends stand by thee, that for me, is an indicator that the Lord knows how to speak to our particular need. I'm not sure if the Lord would have said that to everybody, in part because maybe friendship doesn't mean the same thing to everybody. But we know it was of the utmost value to Joseph, and the Lord speaks in specific ways to our specific hunger. The other thing that's beautiful about that is that beginning in section 84, as you're well aware, the Lord refers to Joseph as his friend. There is a kind of implication here when the Lord says, you, friends stand by you, that he's reminding him that I am your friend. I stand by you. There's a reference there in that same portion of the letter to Job, which reminds us that the Lord draws from Scripture in teaching us and from the experiences of others. Then, of course, ultimately, one of the primary ways, or perhaps the culminating way, that the Lord seeks to give us perspective is to remind us the experience of Christ, who has descended below them all, putting our suffering, putting our troubles into historical perspective, to remind us that there are still things that we can cling to and hold to, which in Joseph's case, includes friendship, which is so meaningful to him. That perspective, when we think that all is lost, when we think that nobody has suffered the way that we have suffered, when we think that nobody can understand the pain that we are feeling, the Lord patiently reminds us that that's not true. And in fact, it can never be true. Based on Alma 7, where the Lord has taken upon Himself all the pains and sicknesses of his people, that reminder in and of itself is of enormous potency in my mind as the Lord tries to help the prophet put his experience into that kind of perspective.

Hank Smith (22:16)

Perspective is so difficult in pain. My son just recently left on a mission. The first 18 and a half years seemed to go by in the blink of an eye, but the next two seem to be an eternity. My wife has to tell me, no, they'll go by pretty fast, just like these others. But at times the days go by.

John (22:40)

Slow in suffering, Hank Texted me when his son left and said, you did this five times.

Dr. David Holland (22:48)

Five times, yeah.

John (22:51)

I remember. On a lighter note, our friend George Durant, he wrote a book years ago called Get Ready, get called Go about missions. These chapters were divided. Go for your mom, go for your dad, go for your siblings, go for your ward, go for the Lord, something like this. But one of his last lines was, go for a hundred reasons, but go for the glory of coming home. That's a moment, Hank. I'm so excited to have you experience that moment. I was watching some videos on my phone of some of my kids coming home. Then you get that idea. Okay, maybe it was a small moment. That's kind of coming up in verse seven.

Hank Smith (23:32)

That fits John with verse nine. Your friends will hail thee again with warm hearts and friendly hands. You'll see them again. Yeah.

Dr. David Holland (23:42)

John mentioned at the outset this question of how long. How long until these promises can be fulfilled. That puts me in a mind of what must have been Joseph's feeling in these opening verses. He begins with what may be a mistake, or at least maybe a failure of perspective. Maybe, maybe not. It seems to me that possible that he mistakes circumstance for God's feeling. He says, why isn't your heart softened toward us? As if to say, if I'm suffering, then there must be a hardness to God's heart toward us. There are some passages of Scripture that might reinforce that thinking, but there are so many others that suggest that we cannot equate the specifics of a circumstance to the nature of God's relationship to us. It reminds me a little bit of Moses 7, where Enoch wants to high five God that Zion has been redeemed, they've been taken up to heaven, and he finds a weeping God. Enoch says, why are you weeping? We've won. You've won. You're the best. We're the best. Why are we not celebrating? And he said, don't you get it? Those are my children down there, too. They hate each other. In that moment where God's detailing all of the crimes of humanity and the reason why he's weeping, even at that moment, his heart is soft toward them. Even at that moment, he is open to their suffering and seeking to save them. The idea that when we're suffering, it means God's heart is hard toward us, I think flies in the face of the testimony of so much Scripture. You think about Christ's compassion for his crucifiers, that even in the moment of ultimate betrayal and crucifixion, his heart is soft toward them. I think the passage is reminding us of the fallacy of assuming that suffering suggests God's displeasure or his closeness to our need. I had this experience once with a woman that I home taught when we lived in California. Remarkable woman. Born in the south and as with many African Americans, migrated to the west coast to work in the war industries. Built a life in the Bay Area in some pretty difficult circumstances and seen a lot of pain in her life. Joined the church a couple of years before I moved into the ward. And then I was assigned to be her home teacher. And we grew very close. I was in grad school and had limited means and limited capacity to do too much for her. We tried, but it all felt so inadequate. I prayed and felt like I had an answer, that God was going to provide something beautiful and glorious for Mitty. And in my mind I assumed that meant that I was going to go. My material circumstances were going to dramatically improve. I was going to have an opportunity to get her out of her circumstances. We'd have this beautiful experience together. And I remember getting the phone call one night that she'd passed away. And I remember just, you know, I'll confess shaking my fist at heaven a little bit. You told me that she'd have this moment of glory. You told me that she'd have this moment of rest and relief. And I remember distinctly this sort of rebuking answer coming, what do you think I'm doing for her now? This idea that we cannot confuse the appearances of the moment for the depth of God's love. The appearances of the moment will never be equal to the profundity of his care. Joseph's wondering if God's heart is hard toward his people is an opportunity for us to maybe reflect on that truth as God comes back to him, beginning in verse seven, with such patience and such kindness and promises of great love.

Hank Smith (27:54)

We read scripture daily. Yet when dark, hard things happen, it's almost our first question. What did I do wrong? Did I offend you? It's fascinating to me that I read Scripture pretty frequently, yet it's almost always that first reaction. Why would you do this to me? I was trying hard, I promise. Almost like you're convincing God that you're really trying to be good.

John (28:21)

Elder D. Todd Christofferson used a vending machine example once in General Conference. The model of a vending machine is you put something in and something comes out immediately for us in life, you put something in. And Job said, how long? David said, how long? In the Psalms, Isaiah said, how long? And you could see us standing Outside of a vending machine going, I did the right thing. How long until the dispensary comes? I remember too, President Benson, what a great statement. He said, one of the trials of life is that we do not usually receive immediately the full blessing for righteousness or the full cursing for wickedness. He said that it will come. It is certain. But ofttimes there is a waiting period that occurs, as was the case with Job and with Joseph. That Joseph example, I run from Potiphar's wife. Yea, here comes my blessing. Yeah. Years in prison. How long?

Dr. David Holland (29:29)

Yeah.

John (29:29)

It's a tough question.

Dr. David Holland (29:31)

It's interesting to me that part of the substance of that question is a recognition that it's the lack of knowledge, it's the lack of the ability to see the end from the beginning that is so painful for us. It's the uncertainty of what's coming next, the uncertainty of each chapter of mortality that sometimes is the most agonizing part of being mortal. We wish we knew exactly what was going to happen. I've actually said to the Lord, I think a time or two, I can take whatever it is. Don't leave me hanging. I need to know. Interesting to me about 121 is that it actually provides a lot of promises of knowledge. If you look at verse 26, God shall give unto you knowledge by his Holy Spirit, yea, by the unspeakable gift of the Holy Ghost that has not been revealed since the world was until now. Again, in verse 33, we've already referenced the vivid language. Here it says, how long can rolling waters remain impure? What power shall stay the heavens? As well might man stretch forth his puny arm to stop the Missouri river and its decreed course, or to turn it upstream as to hinder the Almighty from pouring down knowledge from heaven upon the heads of the Latter Day Saints. In a sense, it's God's way of saying, not only am I not going to leave you suffering forever, I'm not going to leave you in the dark forever. Part of the promise is a promise of eventual understanding that knowledge will come and that nothing can stop that knowledge from coming according to God's decree. That particular verse, verse 33, is quite interesting. When I read it sometimes I remember an experience being at Caesarea Philippi in the Holy Land, which is an interesting location. It's the setting for Matthew 16 where Jesus tells Peter that he is the rock and that he will have the keys to the kingdom. It's a big rock. The Lord's having an object lesson right there. This massive immovable stone that represents the foundation of God's work in the world. And it's also the area that's the headwaters for the Jordan River. You can see from a vantage point of some elevation how crucial that river is. There's this verdant stretch of vegetation, greenery. Wherever that river flows, where the river doesn't flow, it's a very dry and somewhat desolate landscape. Then it ends in the Dead Sea, which is aptly named. That's where water stops flowing. It's almost as if when Jesus is talking to Peter, he's doing it not only with the object lesson of the rock sitting right there, this massive geological structure that underscores the power of his words, but he's also doing it at the headwaters of this life giving river. Part of what he promises Peter is revelation. He tells Peter that revelation is the source of his testimony and this promise of revelatory continuation. As this river rolls through a dry and dusty land, and everywhere it goes, it brings life. As if to say, as long as revelation is flowing, as long as here it's the references to the Missouri river, the idea of the river as the flow of divine knowledge. As long as it's flowing, you will be all right. You will have the ability to navigate the things that life presents to you, but make sure you keep it flowing. Because in the places where it ceases to flow, the places where it stops, that's where trouble begins. So when I think about the sacred landscape of the Savior's life, thinking about the use of these local images to be object lessons here, Joseph's using the Missouri, but Jesus was using the Jordan. But the principle is the same, which is that truth flows. And when truth flows, we're going to be okay. And we need to make sure that we keep it flowing. Life without it is not life. It's interesting that in the depths of this despairing moment, one of the things that the Lord promises Joseph is the continuing revelation of divine knowledge.

Hank Smith (33:50)

That's a perspective changer. I was looking at section 1211 2, where are you? How long? And then you go to the very end. And it's, let us cheerfully do all things that lie in our power. So his perspective definitely changes. That's gotta be one of the factors is revelation is not stopping. No one can stop it.

John (34:14)

I love what David said. Your friends stand by the end.

Hank Smith (34:17)

I am one of them.

John (34:18)

For the Savior to say that, what would that do for you?

Dr. David Holland (34:23)

I mean, there are some interesting verses right here in verses 28, 31 or so partly this is about a very intimate moment. It's a prophet and his God. They are working out this critical moment of pain and frustration. And to John's point, I jotted down my notes as well. The desperation of leadership. Feel like you're responsible for people that you now can't help. So it's a very specific and very intimate moment. But it also expands outward to remind us that God is also the God of the universe. He's also the God of powers and principalities. If there be bounds set to the heavens or to the seas, or to the dry land, or to the sun, moon or stars, you know, a reminder that he's in control of the big things as well as the intimate moments of a particular person's pain. My father was called as a general authority at that time. He was still serving as president of byu. There was about a. He was called the April conference. And he. I don't think he wrapped up his BYU responsibilities until July. So there was a period of months there where he was already getting assignments as a general officer of the church and still trying to run a university. And I just remember those being trying times, difficult times. He was feeling pretty inadequate to his call. He'd spoken about that publicly, so I think I can mention it. But in the midst of all that, in the midst of his own struggle, with his own sense of inadequacy and with the demands of his circumstance, he knew that this change also entailed a move for me that I would have to move from Provo to Bountiful, which doesn't sound like a massive move if anybody knows the geography of the state. But to me, it felt like a massive move. He knew that at that point in my life, all I really cared about was football. I loved playing football and had dreams of glory. I made up for being small by being slow. So that wasn't a good combination. But it didn't hamper my ambition. So he knew this move was bringing some disruption to the things I cared about, including this high school football team I was on. He knew that. Two a day, I don't think they. I think by law you can't do two a days in the summer anymore. But this was back in the olden times when they didn't care about kids. We did these two a day practice sessions. He would drive me up there. We were still living in Provo. He'd drive me up there, go into the office in Salt Lake. I'd find a way to kill time between the two sessions and he'd Come back to get me after the second session. I understand after the fact, sort of the depth of the spiritual struggle he was in trying to rise to the moment and how really deep and difficult that was. But I didn't. I was a 15 year old selfish, self centered kid, sort of mad that we were moving. But he faithfully took me to those practices. I remember we were driving home one day and I was feeling a little discouraged and he was feeling a little discouraged. Calls me Duff, he said, Duff read us a scripture and there was a little blue Book of Mormon in the pocket of the car, as there often seemed to be. And I picked it up and just randomly opened to Enos 12 as a matter of fact. It says you'll have the desires of your heart because of your prayer of faith. And I remember us both being moved in that moment, kind of feeling it again now that I look back on it. The enormity of the difference between our areas of concern. You had somebody that was trying to run a 30,000 plus student university and take on a new calling. Then you had a guy, then you had a sophomore in high school who was trying to get on a football team. You think about the dramatic contrast between those, the macro and the micro, the global and the self centered. Yet that verse of scripture was designed to speak to both of us. God loved us both in the place that we were in the grand scheme of things. Perhaps my little high school worries were as important to the Lord as my Father's global concerns. He sent the same verse to both of us in the same moment. In section 121 we see both parts of God. We see him in the details of the particular wrongs and the particular challenges. We also have him remind us. And also, I am the God of the planets. I'm the God of the universe. I have control over all of these things. Then we get to those parts of the section that we often quote when we're talking about leadership. You quoted them, Hank, when you were introducing John. Some of his characteristics it talks about. There are many called but fewer chosen beginning in verse 34. Why are they not chosen? Because their hearts are so much upon the things of this world and aspire to the honors of men. Goes on to talk about the rights of the priesthood, being inextricably bound to the principles of righteousness and the ways in which we can abuse that. Then it gives us a reminder, a warning about human nature. This is part of what I was alluding to at the outset about the universality of the things that are being taught here because the Lord wants to tell us something about our tendencies. It is the nature and disposition of almost all men that as soon as they get a little authority, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion. Part of my area of historical research is the Puritan period. I think about the Puritans. There's a lot to be said about the Puritans, pros and cons. History is always complicated and cultures are often equal parts light and dark. But one of the things that I've come to appreciate about Puritan theology, this Calvinist theology that they carried, was its warning about human nature. I think as moderns, as products of the 20th and now 21st centuries, we've inherited a kind of optimism. People are intrinsically good and human nature leans toward the positive. There's a sort of American ness to that, that positivity about human nature, which is all well and good. We are created in the image of God and we have divine DNA and all the things that I believe. But the Lord will occasionally, as King Benjamin does, to remind us about the natural man being an enemy of God, or as this passage does, remind us to take care that there are tendencies in us that are dangerous. I remember being in a bishop brick many years ago when a member of another bishopric had had some trouble. And I remember the stake president just speaking to all the bishoprics, saying, we're all subject. We are all subject to these temptations. We are all subject to human nature and we have to take care. We have to recognize our own imperfection. It's interesting that in this section God reminds us of those tendencies. God reminds us of human nature's capacity for corruption, then tells us to lean into the better parts of ourselves, the angels of our better nature, to remind us about persuasion and long suffering and gentleness and meekness and love unfeigned and kindness and pure knowledge and to avoid hypocrisy and to avoid guile and then to show an increase of love even when we have to reprove with sharpness. You see these two parts of humanity's capacity. The beauty of verses 41 through 43 and then the dangers of the verses that precede it. And a call to be committed to our best selves and to be mindful of our weaknesses.

Hank Smith (42:28)

This reminds me, I brought this with me today. A talk from General Conference. Continue in patience. This is President Uchtdorf speaking at priesthood session. He said there is a reason that almost every lesson on priesthood leadership at some point arrives at the 121st section of the doctrine and covenants. In a few verses, the Lord provides a master course in priesthood leadership. He quotes what you just quoted, verse 41. The character traits and practices described in these verses are the foundation of godly patience and are inseparably connected to effective priesthood service. These attributes will give you strength and wisdom in magnifying your callings in preaching the Gospel, in fellowshiping core members, and in giving the most important priesthood service, which is indeed the loving service within the walls of your own homes. It really is, in one or two verses, a master class in not just priesthood leadership, leadership in general in parenting. How to have Influence in today's terms, the word influencer has become a common word. I think this is the Lord saying, you want to be an influencer. This is how you do it.

Dr. David Holland (43:42)

And quite candidly, quite explicitly says, there's no other way. These other ways simply are no way at all. That's a pretty stark reminder to us. I was serving as a bishop in Las Vegas in 2008. I was called and 2008 was a terrible financial time for the country in general and for Las Vegas in particular. I was relatively young. I was 34 at the time I was called. Didn't have a lot of life experience. Suddenly I was responsible for this ward that was in financial peril, financial crisis. I was running around trying to keep the lights on and keep people housed and fed. And I remember feeling quite overwhelmed. And I was out on a walk in the desert, sunrise in my head and wrestling with these concerns. I had been praying for confidence. I felt a lack of confidence to really go in and help people with clear sense of purpose and knowing what I was doing and some clarity of plan for this situation. And I'd been praying for confidence and praying for confidence and didn't feel it coming as I was out on my walk. This verse came to my mind in verse 45 Let thy bowels also be full of charity towards all men and to the household of faith, and let virtue garnish thy thoughts unceasingly, and then shall thy confidence wax strong in the presence of God. It occurred to me on this walk that I'd been praying for the wrong thing. I'd been praying for confidence and it wasn't coming. The Lord says here that confidence is a product of charity. Let your bowels be full of charity. There's some link between the depth of our love and the confidence that we bring in our effort to help people. I began to pray for more charity for my ward, more charity for the people. And as my love grew, I found myself acting with greater confidence. And I don't know exactly what the relationship is there, except that in the purification of motive and in the depth of strong feeling for one another, I think there is strength, there's power in that. I've also always been struck that, you know, the first part of that verse, Let thy vows be full of charity toward all men and to the household of faith. I've often wondered why that formulation is as it is. Wouldn't the household of faith be included in all people? That seems pretty comprehensive. But then again, and maybe this is a reflection on some time as a bishop or other callings that are involved in the councils of the church. I've been struck a time or two in ward councils that sometimes we're bending over backwards to be charitable and patient with people that never really darken the door of the building. And yet we're really impatient and sharp with the person sitting next to us. Maybe the Lord knows what he's doing when he says, look, yeah, I want you to love everybody, but you also need to love the household of faith, because these are the people that we work with and worship with. It reminds me of that passage in the Screwtape Letters when they're talking about how to tempt a person that's sitting at church, and they said, well, just remind him that his neighbors on the pew are annoying. Just remind him that the people that he's worshiping with are imperfect. It's interesting that the Lord reminds us here that in our charity for all people that we should include the household of faith. It's, I think, quite telling that we need to be reminded of that a time or two.

Hank Smith (47:28)

Yeah. These are the ones you're going to bump up against the most, most likely. We had a wonderful interview last year with Dr. Melissa Inouye, a historian for the church. She talked about Mosiah, 18, about the church coming together as the church. What'd she say, John? You and she both. It was funny. The Lord, he commands us to love our enemies, so he puts them in our ward. So many enemies, one convenient location. But the idea is, I think, David, that's what you're saying. It's almost easier to love someone you never see, you never really talk to. Yet here's the. The neighbor next door who made that comment in Sunday school that I just can't get past.

John (48:13)

As a young person, I felt like there was some missing punctuation or something in some of these verses. Like verse 36, the rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven, and that the powers of heaven cannot be controlled nor handled. I felt like semicolon. Only upon the principles of righteousness. Do you see it that way?

Dr. David Holland (48:38)

I see what you're saying, yep.

John (48:40)

Then it made sense to me. Okay. It cannot be controlled nor handled only. No. Cannot be controlled or handled only upon the principles of righteousness. And then I just love this line that they may be conferred upon us. It is true. Okay, I may have been ordained, but then the word amen, that sounds like sayonara. Sayonara to the priesthood and authority of that man. If you try to cover your sins, gratify your pride, your vain ambition, or to exercise control or dominion, then you may have been ordained, but you don't have the priesthood. And this idea of formal authority, perhaps, versus moral authority, when you do any of that, you don't have the priesthood anymore. Oh, you may have been ordained, but you don't have it. Which is so different than maybe the way we think of leadership in other settings, like at work or in the military or something like that. So when you see Amen to the priesthood authority of that man, you get the same meaning.

Hank Smith (49:39)

Right?

John (49:39)

It's like, that's done. There's a story. Elder Hugh Pinnock gave a talk at BYU in the 70s, if you can imagine such a thing. Hank. It's like 10 keys to marriage and Family Relationships. And he talked about a couple coming in to see him. We're talking about a church with two and a half, three million members, long time ago. A husband saying, tell her she has to obey me because I have the priesthood. Elder Pinnock, when this man said, tell her she has to obey me, he just looked at him and said, you don't have the priesthood. He said, yes, I do. I was ordained. When was that?

Hank Smith (50:16)

Ethel?

John (50:17)

Right. And he just kept saying, you don't have the priesthood. He said, I guess I don't know what you mean. And guess what? Elder Pinnock opened right here and read this to him. You don't have the priesthood if you are behaving that way. This was in a marriage relationship. I never forgot that idea. This is a different kind of power and authority. These verses are so good and so profound. You said it, Hank, about how do we influence others. And then we have this beautiful list in verse 41. The other thing I wanted to mention was I'm kind of a nerd when it comes to this. I'm looking at the footnotes here. I had Robert J. Matthews for a professor for a time. He talked about being on the Scriptures Publication Committee that put out our edition of the Scriptures. So it was exciting to me to see if. This has 27 lines of footnotes. This is doctrinally rich.

Hank Smith (51:15)

It's like one of those two Nephi.

John (51:16)

9, second Nephi 2, second Nephi 9, Mosiah 3. Yeah. There's one page in the Old Testament that has zero footnotes. Guess what it is. Yeah.

Hank Smith (51:28)

It's the Song of Solomon.

John (51:30)

Song of Solomon, Yeah. But this is doctrinally rich, ought to be read slowly.

Hank Smith (51:38)

When I read verse 39 and I'm looking inward, I kind of hear this. We have learned by sad experience that is the nature and disposition of almost all men, including you, Hank. As soon as you became a parent, you immediately began to exercise unrighteous dominion. When you have someone like a child who is dependent upon you, you have complete control of the situation. And you use that control in a way to almost take shortcuts. I don't want to build the relationship that takes too long. I will make you do these things because I'm in charge. I'm the dad. I said so. Those shortcuts end up costing you enormous sums in the long run because the pup grows up right.

Dr. David Holland (52:32)

There is no substitute for the ratio that's described in 43. Reproving betimes with sharpness, but then showing forth afterward an increase of love. The idea that the proportionality of truth and grace, love and doctrine, these things have to be overwhelmingly on the love relationship side of that ledger in order for any of the rest of it to have any kind of positive meaning.

John (53:00)

Yeah. I have in my notes Elder H. Burke Peterson. I think he was Bishop H. Burke Peterson at one time, Presiding Bishop. And he actually said that the word sharpness is maybe misunderstood. He said, perhaps we should consider what it means to reprove with sharpness. Reproving with sharpness means reproving with clarity, with loving firmness, with serious intent. It does not mean reproving with sarcasm or. Or with bitterness or with clenched teeth and a raised voice. I've appreciated that idea. Giving real clarity. It's not, oh, you're fine. Never mind. Oh, no, it's reproving, but it's with clarity.

Dr. David Holland (53:45)

I had a student once tell me that clarity was kindness. I was being a little vague in my expectations of the course, and she said, clarity is kindness.

John (53:53)

Interesting.

Hank Smith (53:55)

I talked about myself being a parent. I'll give you an example. And I hope there's some parents out there that can see themselves here. But I think my daughter was 15 or so, and she's on the couch and she was on her phone and I had a big pile of dishes. John, I'm sure you've heard me tell this story. I said, hey, you want to help me with the dishes? She turned and looked at me and said no. Went back to her phone.

John (54:20)

And that's content communication right there. Do you want to? Nope. Okay.

Hank Smith (54:26)

I should have thought to myself, how can I have more influence? How can I be more long suffering and gentle and kind? But I didn't. I went immediately to unrighteous dominion. I said, hey, we're going to make a new rule. It's one of the best parts about being a parent, right? I can make a brand new rule, new law. She who does not help with the dishes doesn't get to use her phone. I said, now do you want to help me with the dishes? Right? And she said, yes. Right. She came over. We didn't build the relationship at all. I was really disappointed in her for not wanting to be my friend. That is to me what the Lord is saying here is it may feel like you made progress, you made no progress. In fact, you took a step back.

John (55:11)

You digressed maybe, right?

Dr. David Holland (55:13)

Yeah.

Hank Smith (55:14)

You hurt the relationship in your unrighteous dominion. But it's such a natural tendency, like David said, it's inside of us, lean into the best part of ourselves. I wrote that down.

Dr. David Holland (55:28)

Well, I think that's a constant effort. I mean, if it is part of our nature, which this section seems to suggest, it also means that it's a constant effort, maybe a lifelong effort, maybe even longer than life effort to fully come to embody verses 41, 42 and completely eliminate verses 37 from our life.

Hank Smith (55:52)

You think, oh, I'm a good person. I'm a church leader. This would not happen to me in my church leadership. Yet there are stories of the best among us hurting those in their flock, mission presidents, hurting missionaries and stake presidents and bishops. In a moment of anger saying something. It's hard. This is one of those, David, where I frequently say this to John. If we just get this section from Joseph Smith. Who is this? Right? Who is this? This is incredible.

Dr. David Holland (56:25)

Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's true.

John (56:27)

I would love to hear what you both think about the difference between being called and chosen. I have always wondered exactly what that meant. Behold, there are many called, but few are chosen. How do you guys perceive that?

Hank Smith (56:44)

Maybe I'm resting the scriptures here, but I've always rephrased it as many are called but few show up. The sign up sheet is full, but the attendance is lacking.

John (56:56)

Yeah, I have in my margin Many sign up, few show up. Maybe that was from four years ago.

Hank Smith (57:02)

Yeah.

Dr. David Holland (57:04)

I'm not sure that it really matches the language here, but I've thought a lot about the passages of Scripture where the Lord says, and then you shall be the children of God, which has always been in tension with this doctrine and theology of ours, that we're all already the children of God. So why do the Scriptures sometimes make it sound like that's contingent, that by certain actions we become the children of God. I wonder if sometimes it's not so much that there are really substantive differences between the words called and chosen, any more than there are substantive differences between being the child of God in I Am a Child of God children's hymn, or being the child of God described in Romans 8, which says, Then we shall become the children of God. For me, maybe the analogy is when somebody says to one of my children, wow, you're really your mother's daughter? Of course she is. Right?

Hank Smith (58:08)

Yeah.

John (58:09)

Right.

Dr. David Holland (58:09)

But when you say that, you mean that. Yeah, you have chosen to act the way that she acts. The words are the same, but the relationship is different. And we all sort of know what that means. Maybe calling and choosing in terms of their actual dictionary definitions are not all that different, but in this context, it's like being a child of God or being a child of God that we have chosen to hear that calling. And that's what makes the difference.

Hank Smith (58:44)

Coming up in part two.

Dr. David Holland (58:46)

My own view is to whitewash or to shy away from history is to rewrite God's work in the world. The fact that people are blemished and histories are challenging. As we have just been discussing in these sections, God does not want us to shy away from the dark and difficult things.