The politics of the Warner Bros. bidding war

Summary

Front Burner – The Politics of the Warner Bros. Bidding War
CBC | Host: Jamie Poisson | Guest: Lucas Shaw (Bloomberg News)
Episode Date: December 10, 2025

---

Episode Overview

This episode of Front Burner dissects a high-stakes bidding war for Warner Bros. Discovery, a titan of Hollywood and news media, which finds itself the prize in a struggle between two industry giants: Netflix and Paramount. Host Jamie Poisson and guest Lucas Shaw delve into the implications for media consolidation, the future of entertainment, creative culture, political influence, and regulatory oversight in a moment that echoes—and potentially surpasses—past shifts in the entertainment landscape.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. The Netflix Acquisition — Why the Backlash?

(00:53–07:05)

• Netflix’s Move: Netflix’s announcement to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery—comprising HBO, CNN, and massive film/TV libraries—met with significant industry blowback.
• Loss of Competition: Major concern centers around further consolidation of Hollywood’s "Big Six" studios, which has already been diminished by the Disney-Fox merger. Reducing the number would undermine competition and creative opportunities, impacting writers, directors, and producers.
  • Lucas Shaw (02:36): “Competition is good if you’re a seller, if you’re a producer… the movie business, in losing another movie studio, would be bad for theaters... which have really struggled, especially since the pandemic.”
• Netflix as Industry “Outsider”: Although Netflix is now entertainment royalty, it’s seen as disruptive with Silicon Valley roots, causing both innovation and “carnage” in traditional TV and film. The perception is that Netflix drove a boom-bust cycle in content production—leaving many workers feeling betrayed as the industry contracts.
  • Lucas Shaw (03:30): “People blame Netflix, I think, somewhat unfairly. But to have this company that kind of caused all this carnage… makes people very nervous.”

2. The Fear for Theatres

(04:34–07:05)

• Threat to Theatrical Releases: Netflix’s preference for simultaneous streaming and minimal theatrical windows threatens the classical cinema model, livelihoods, and awards infrastructure.
  • Lucas Shaw (06:07): “Their primary business is their streaming service… They want to put movies in theaters and on streaming at the same time. They sometimes give movies sort of a token release in theaters… But they haven’t embraced that traditional model.”
• Labor & Industry Pushback: Filmmakers, unions, and theatre chains have actively lobbied Congress to prevent a Netflix-led acquisition, fearing the “death grip” its model could impose on theaters.

3. Why Is Warner Bros. Up for Sale—Again?

(08:23–09:53)

• History of Ownership Changes: Warner Bros. has changed hands repeatedly over the past decade (from Time Warner to AT&T, then to Warner Bros. Discovery) due to the devastation wrought by the streaming revolution on cable TV profits and failed attempts to compete with Netflix.
  • Lucas Shaw (08:30): “This would be the third time in the last decade because of… the streaming revolution… None of them have really cracked the streaming thing. The cable networks have gotten weaker and weaker.”

4. “End of the Streaming Wars”?

(09:53–11:45)

• Monopoly Fears: Some press dubbed Netflix’s bid the “end” or “annihilation” of competition, describing Netflix as a “black hole” sucking in all entertainment.
  • Jamie Poisson (10:09, quoting The Ringer): “Netflix has grown into the entertainment industry’s biggest black hole… Everything else eventually gets sucked into it…”
• Skepticism About a True Monopoly: Lucas Shaw counters that, while Netflix is dominant—especially if it absorbs HBO and Warner Bros.—media history shows big mergers often backfire, and other competitors (like YouTube) remain immense.
  • Lucas Shaw (11:45): “[Media] deals have a pretty poor track record and there is a world in which this could actually end badly for Netflix.”

---

5. The Paramount Hostile Takeover Attempt

(13:48–15:42)

• Paramount/Skydance Bid: After Warner Bros. rebuffed prior offers and leaned toward Netflix, Paramount (backed by Larry Ellison, with Jared Kushner’s fund involved) submitted a hostile all-cash takeover bid of $108 billion, escalating the corporate confrontation.

  • Paramount is promising a better offer and making overtures to shareholders and the board, hoping to leverage regulatory or market opposition to Netflix.
  • Lucas Shaw (14:04): “Their argument is that it’s better than Netflix’s. Warner Bros. Discovery feels differently… I think the more likely scenario is that they have to come back and offer more money.”

• Industry Concerns: Parallels with the Fox-Disney merger surface: likely job losses (“$6 billion in cost synergies”), killing off one of the last Hollywood studios, deleterious for creative and employment diversity.

  • Lucas Shaw (15:42): “That is a lot of people getting fired… There was great concern about job losses, about the loss of a studio.”

• Unique Worries: Paramount’s political connections—close proximity to Trump and the involvement of Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds—make many nervous about editorial independence, especially at CNN.

  • Lucas Shaw (17:26): “They have made assurances about how they would change the programming at CNN… a lot of the financing comes from sovereign wealth funds… and from Jared Kushner.”

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On Industry Anxiety:
  Lucas Shaw (02:36): “If there were six major studios, suddenly you’d be down to four. People don’t like that. Competition is good if you’re a seller, if you’re a producer…”

• On Netflix’s Disruptive Role:
  Lucas Shaw (03:30): “To have this company that kind of caused all this carnage in the industry then going to swallow one of the great studios… it just makes people very nervous.”

• On Paramount’s Plan:
  Lucas Shaw (15:42): “Paramount has said there would be $6 billion in cost synergies. That is a lot of people getting fired.”

• On Political Interference:
  Lucas Shaw (19:37): “Traditionally, the president would not have a role in vetting a major merger… But President Trump… doesn’t really govern in the traditional ways… his opinion will matter quite a bit.”

• Jane Fonda Op-ed Reflection (21:34): Jamie Poisson quoting Fonda: “Our jobs, our creative freedom, and the constitutional promise… are at stake. In a media landscape where more consolidation… always seems to be around the corner, is there any hope for a more varied, competitive and free industry?”

• On the Shrinking Entertainment Industry:
  Lucas Shaw (23:12): “The traditional film and television business… share of the culture business is shrinking. It has more competition from gaming, from social media, from all these other places.”

---

Important Segment Timestamps

• Main Topic Introduction: 00:47
• Netflix Acquisition Backlash: 01:53–07:05
• Theatres’ Plight & Industry Pushback: 04:34–07:05
• Warner Bros. Ownership Shuffle Explained: 08:23–09:53
• Is This the End of the Streaming Wars?: 09:53–11:45
• Paramount’s Hostile Bid & Industry Impact: 13:48–15:42
• Political Influence and CNN Fears: 17:15–19:04
• Regulatory Uncertainty and Trump’s Role: 19:04–20:42
• Jane Fonda’s Op-ed & Hope for Industry Diversity: 21:34–24:06

---

Tone & Delivery

Throughout, Jamie Poisson provides sharp, accessible questions and context. Lucas Shaw responds with clear, jargon-free analysis, often bringing nuance that counters prevailing headlines. The exchanges are brisk, insightful, and at times laced with industry-weary humor, perfectly matching Front Burner’s reputation for thoughtful, accessible news coverage.

---

Conclusion

The episode expertly unpacks the dizzying complexities of the Warner Bros. bidding war, illustrating the high stakes for jobs, creativity, market power, and even national politics—and leaves listeners with open questions about who, if anyone, can balance profit, art, and democratic values in the new entertainment era.

Transcript

[VRBO Advertiser]

With stays under $250 a night, VRBO makes it easy to celebrate sweater weather. You could book a cabin stay with leaf views for days. Or a brownstone in a city where festivals are just a walk away. Or a lakeside home with a fire pit for cozy nights with friends. Or if you're not a sweater person, we can call it corduroy weather. More flexible. And with stays under $250 a night, you can book a home that suits your exact needs. Book [e-mail].

[Lucas Shah]

This is a CBC podcast.

[Jamie Poisson]

Hi everyone, I'm Jamie Poisson.

So this week, two of the biggest media companies in the world are going to war over Warner Bros. Discovery, a historic Hollywood studio that also owns the likes of HBO and cnn. On Monday, in a move that feels straight out of the show succession, Paramount put in a hostile all cash takeover bid for Warner Bros. Worth More than $108 billion. That sent shockwaves through an industry already reeling from Netflix announcing that it had won a bid to buy Warner Bros. Film studio and streaming divisions. All of this raises a ton of questions around media concentration, influence over the news, and the future of the entertainment industry. The Paramount bid is led by big time mega donor Larry Ellison and is backed by Trump's son in law, Jared Kushner. And the President has already signaled that he'll be involved in whatever deal comes through. So today I am joined by Lucas Shah to talk through all of this. He reports on the arts and entertainment industry for Bloomberg News.

Lucas, hey, it's great to have you.

[Lucas Shah]

Yeah, thanks for having me. Good to be here.

[Jamie Poisson]

So before Paramount came in with their hostile takeover bid on Monday, Netflix had already announced that it would be acquiring Warner Brothers Discovery. So let's, let's start there kind of at the beginning, I guess. The Netflix deal would combine two of the biggest streaming platforms with one of the largest traditional movie and television studios. And this came after Warner Brothers rebuffed multiple offers from Paramount. Still, we saw a number of pieces online saying that this could be the death of Hollywood as we know it. And so why the blowback to the Netflix deal?

[Lucas Shah]

Yeah, so I think there were two levels of resistance in the entertainment business. One is on the idea of Warner Brothers being sold at all.

The industry had already seen Disney swallow most of the entertainment assets owned by Fox, which resulted in the elimination of one of the kind of the major Hollywood studios. Warner Brothers being sold again, whether it was to Paramount, to Comcast or Netflix, I think was seen as once again an elimination of another studio. So if there were Six major studios, suddenly you'd be down to four. People don't like that. Competition is good if you're a seller, if you're a producer. And I think more than anything, concern. Even though the TV business at Warner Brothers is much bigger than the film business, there is the film business just looms large in everyone's mind because of its history and its cultural significance. And so a feeling that the, the movie business, in losing another movie studio would be bad for theaters, which have really struggled, especially since the pandemic. I think Netflix added another layer of concern.

Because Netflix is still seen as something of an outsider. It came from Silicon Valley. It has caused a lot of change and turmoil in the entertainment business over the last 10 or 15 years. Now I would argue that it created a great product, people liked it and, and there are ways in which the business changed. That may not have been good, but it was gonna change anyways. And it was incumbent upon these other companies to respond to it and they've largely failed. But that argument, even if it's true, doesn't really feel great to the average writer who's having a harder time getting a job right now. I mean, we've gone through these cycles where there was a kind of a decade long boom in output and in just every year more shows being made. In the last two or three years there's been a real retrenchment. And so, and a lot of people blame Netflix, I think, somewhat unfairly. But to have this company that kind of caused all this carnage in the industry, then going to swallow one of the great studios, it just makes people very nervous, especially on the movie front, because Netflix doesn't really release its movies in theaters.

[Jamie Poisson]

And just on this theater point, if we could just dig into it a little bit more. Last week there was this letter, right, signed by a bunch of anonymous Hollywood A listers that got sent to Congress speaking out against the Netflix Warner Bros. Acquisition, saying that it would effectively hold a noose around the theatrical market. And just tell me a little bit more about why people are lamenting that so much.

[Lucas Shah]

Well, so Netflix produces and releases more original movies than any company in the US at least I would say the world. But there may be some companies in India or Japan or something like that, that's that do more. But over its history, it has never embraced the model for films that the traditional studios have, which is you put it in theaters for several weeks, if not months, and it's not available for viewing at home until after that. And it's certainly not available to Stream. Right. Even. Even studios that have pretty aggressive windows, which is the kind of industry jargon for that gap between the theaters and being made available at home. Look, like Universal. They make it available for rent and purchase at a certain point, but you still usually can't stream it at a minimum for like a month and a half. Netflix is not interested in that because their primary business is their streaming service. And so they want to put movies in theaters and on streaming at the same time. They sometimes give movies sort of a token release in theaters either to placate a filmmaker or to have a movie contend for awards.

But they haven't embraced that traditional model. And so if they were to kind of swallow Warner Brothers and have all these big movies being made available so soon afterwards, there's a lot of concern about what that would mean for theaters. Now, it's important to note that Netflix initially promised Warner Brothers that it would continue to release its movies in theaters. Then on a call with the press last week, Ted Sarandez, the CO CEO, sort of intimated that while they would put them in theaters, that that lag would be pretty short. Right. A few weeks. And then he kind of walked that back again when there was a blowback to those comments. Because it's not just those anonymous producers. It's been all, you know, the major theater chains, labor unions. A lot of people have been worried about what Netflix will do to the movie business.

[Jamie Poisson]

So Warner Brothers, as you mentioned, is a studio with all this cultural cachet.

[Lucas Shah]

Peek under the title of Warner Bros. Dis Discovery and find some of the world's most iconic characters.

[Blue Apron Advertiser]

What's up, Doc?

[Jamie Poisson]

Follow the yellow brick, Ro. From classics like the wizard of Oz.

[Lucas Shah]

You'Re up to see the Wizards.

To a Harry Potter franchise worth $10 billion.

[Jamie Poisson]

Warner Brothers, for the last hundred years, it has acquired some of the biggest franchises in film history. We're talking about, like Harry Potter, the Lord of the Rings.

[Donald Trump]

I can't carry it for you, but.

[Jamie Poisson]

I can carry the DC Universe.

[Lucas Shah]

Why so serious? The Matrix. You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. And then a lot of great old movies like Casablanca is looking at you, kid.

[Jamie Poisson]

Yeah. And then also you have hbo, right? Game of Thrones, the Wire, Sopranos.

[Blue Apron Advertiser]

Are you in the Mafia?

[Lucas Shah]

Am I in the.

[Blue Apron Advertiser]

Whatever you want.

[Jamie Poisson]

Anyways, we could go on, but why has the studio been essentially up for sale for the last little while? To begin with.

[Lucas Shah]

Well, yeah, it's been sold three. This would be the third time in the last decade because of all the, you know, because essentially the streaming revolution in the entertainment business. So it was previously hbo, Warner Brothers, and these cable networks like CNN and TBS were the foundation of a company called Time Warner. And Time Warner decided to sell to AT&T about a decade ago because they were looking at the competition and saying Netflix has really sort of outstripped us now in streaming. We're not sure what the future of all of our cable networks looks like because that's where most of the profit for the company came from. And AT&T, one of the big phone companies in the US Had a vision for making the HBO streaming service more competitive with Netflix and also using that to help their phone business. That deal got delayed by a couple of years because of a regulatory review, because President Trump was trying to get in the way of basically was mad at CNN and so on it to make their life miserable. And since then, it's been a few different regimes, and none of them have really cracked the streaming thing. The cable networks have gotten weaker and weaker. And so even though the. This current deal would be very lucrative for a lot of shareholders, the share price of Warner Brothers Discovery has been in freefall for the last few years.

[Jamie Poisson]

When the Netflix deal was announced last week, a few media watchers called it the end of the streaming wars. I just want to read you this quote from a Ringer piece that argues that Netflix has won the streaming wars for some time, but this would make it an annihilation.

Quote. Netflix has grown into the entertainment industry's biggest black hole. Everything else eventually gets sucked into it until its own light can escape. And all you see is Netflix. Like, what do you make of that? Do you think it's overblown? Is this the end of the streaming wars If. If the Netflix deal is successful?

[Lucas Shah]

I have been a, I guess a rare voice of dissent or skepticism when people say that Netflix has won the streaming wars. It is undeniably one of, if not the leading streaming service. But I think people need to step back a little bit when you look at competition for time. And I'm not trying to do the, like, Netflix thing where they compare themselves to sleep or reading or whatever, but just in video entertainment. I mean, people spend more time watching YouTube than they do Netflix. Now, specifically in the professional Hollywood context, Netflix is the biggest. It's twice the size of Disney, and HBO would give it a huge, huge advantage. And so I do think that it would further their lead and make it much more difficult for anyone to catch up. Because the advantage that all these other companies have had on Netflix all this time has been they have a library of all these great shows and movies that they can put on their service and exploit to remake and all the, and all of that. And they would lose that if Netflix did this deal. The only flip side to that, I guess I'd say is that Netflix has never done a deal of this size. Big media deals have a pretty poor track record and there is a world in which this could actually end badly for Netflix.

[Jamie Poisson]

Yeah. Just elaborate for me a little bit on how.

[Lucas Shah]

Well, I guess the honest answer is, I don't know because it'd be seeing into the future. But Netflix has a very clearly defined culture.

You bring in 10, 15,000 people from another company, kind of a traditional Hollywood company, it can change the way that you do business. You get bigger, you get more bloated. One of the things that's been very impressive about Netflix in its history is even as it's gotten bigger and more powerful, it has been able to move pretty quickly. You know, when they had, they ran into problems about three plus years ago where their growth stopped and within 12 months they had an advertising business and they had start, had started to really crack down on password sharing. I think those are initiatives that at a lot of other media companies would have taken like three years. And so the bigger they get, the harder it is for them to move.

[Blue Apron Advertiser]

Maybe you like cooking, maybe you don't. Either way, the new Blue Apron is for you. Because along with our classic meal kits, we're offering new pre made and one pan meals to help you get dinner on the table fast. And now there is no subscription needed so you can just order and enjoy. Do delicious food your way. Shop 100/[e-mail] Get 50% off your first two orders with code apron50 Terms and conditions apply. Visit blueapron.com terms for more. You. You've never been one to blend in. Your colors shine too big and too bright for that. Your wit, your fearlessness. The way you find beauty in, well, everything. It's what makes you unlike anyone else. You deserve a desert diamond in colors unlike anything else too. From pale champagnes to deep ambers to smoky whiskeys. Natural colors that reflect all the shades of you. Discover desert diamonds. A diamond is forever.

[Jamie Poisson]

Let's do the Paramount Skydance hostile takeover. The $108 billion hostile bid to buy all of Warner Brothers. Just tell me a little bit about what was announced this week. And then the reaction to that news.

[Lucas Shah]

Well, Paramount was laying the groundwork for this last week when it sent letters to Warner Brothers Discovery and their lawyers and the board basically saying, you're running an unfair process. And that was a clear indication that they thought that Netflix was going to win, but they didn't think it was right. For now, they have essentially reiterated their offer. They submit the same bid for the most part that they had before $30 a share. Their argument is that it's better than Netflix's. Warner Bros. Discovery feels differently. A lot of that hinges on the value assigned to the cable networks that Paramount would buy and that Netflix would not. It's, it's, it's like hostile ish. Right. They, they, they can always pull it back. I don't think they've started to buy up shares in Warner Brothers Discovery yet. For example, they are trying to curry favor with the board and with shareholders and hope that maybe there's some changes in the regulatory environment where President Trump weighs in one way or another. You know, Netflix's share price has been going down. Its shareholders aren't that excited about this deal that might force Netflix to reconsider a little bit. So there's a world in which, you know, I guess they, they get the board of Warner Brothers to change their mind with this offer. I think the more likely scenario is that they have to come back and offer more money. But this was just sort of a stopgap before they get there.

[Jamie Poisson]

And if the industry was worried about the Netflix merger, how are they feeling about this one?

[Lucas Shah]

Well, the industry was worried about the Paramount merger or the prospect of a Paramount deal before because Paramount for most of the process was seen as the favorite. Right. They initiated this by offering some unsolicited bids. Even in the days before, most people were still thinking it was going to be Paramount and people were worried for similar but slightly different reasons from Netflix. You think about Paramount has a lot of overlap with Warner Bros. Discovery. So they both, in a sense they're structured in similar ways. They both own a lot of cable networks, which is how they make most of their money. They both own kind of third tier streaming services and they both own movie studios. And so Paramount has said there would be $6 billion in cost synergies. That is a lot of people getting fired. And it would still result in, even though Paramount says that they're going to operate Warner Brothers and Paramount as different studios, it would likely result in there being just one studio long term, kind of like with Fox and Disney. So there was great concern about job losses, about the loss of a studio. You don't have the same concern about Paramount in regards to it being sort of like a Silicon Valley interloper that caused all this change. You don't do have concern about the kind of political affiliations of the Ellisons and their seeming proximity to the president and the fact that some of their, a lot of their offer involves Middle Eastern money.

[Donald Trump]

I mean, none of them are particularly great friends of mine. You know, I just, I want to, I want to do what's right.

[Jamie Poisson]

Right. And just tell me a little bit more about that. Larry and David Ellison. This deal would also include cnn. Jared Kushner's fund is involved in this.

[Lucas Shah]

Yeah. So Larry Ellison, the, you know, the, the one of the richest men in the world, co founder of Oracle, this enterprise software company. He and his son David would be, are the controlling shareholders in Paramount, would be the controlling shareholders in this new combined company. Larry was long sort of one of the rare Silicon Valley billionaires to be kind of an outspoken conservative that is now far more common in that industry. And so he has a pretty good relationship with President Trump. And they, according to some reports, I haven't confirmed this one myself, like they have made assurances about how they would change the programming at cnn. Certain people they might fire and hire. They, they have already acquired this website, the Free Press, and put a woman named Barry Weiss, who's a kind of a conservative political pundit, in charge of CBS News, which has made people very nervous. And then, yes, as part of the bid, a large chunk of the financing comes from sovereign wealth funds of three different Middle Eastern countries, including Saudi Arabia. And then there is also money from Jared Kushner, the President's son in law. You know, when asked about it, President.

[Donald Trump]

Trump said, I don't know, I've never spoken to him. He's really trying to work on Gaza. I think Gaza's his primary thing.

[Lucas Shah]

Is Gaza.

Sensitive to the fact that all of that, all those kind of financial ties might be worrisome? Paramount has insisted that all of those entities, the Middle Eastern funds as well as Jared Kushner, have surrendered any governance rights, which means that they would not, you know, have board seats or anything like that.

[Jamie Poisson]

You mentioned earlier that people are concerned about the regulatory environment. And on Sunday, Trump weighed in saying.

[Donald Trump]

They have a very big market share. And when they have Warner Brothers, you know, that chair goes up a lot. So I don't know that's going to be for some economists to tell. And also, and I'll be involved in that decision, too.

[Jamie Poisson]

The president says he'll be part of the vetting process here.

What, what would his role be traditionally in a deal like this? Like, how much of a thumb could he potentially put on the scale here?

[Lucas Shah]

I mean, traditionally, the president would not have a role in vetting a major merger. It's just not their job. There are federal agencies that are technically part of the executive branch that would, like the Department of Justice.

When it comes to antitrust, which is sort of the primary area of concern here, at least in the US that is shared between the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, both of which, again, are executive agencies or parts of that branch, but usually none. But President Trump, as I think most listeners know, doesn't really govern in the traditional ways of, of, of a president. And it seems like his opinion tends to sway the behavior in particular of the Department of Justice.

So I think his opinion will matter quite a bit, I think. And right now he seems to be keeping his options open, right? He has been. He was complimentary towards Netflix Co CEO Ted Sarandos and towards the company.

While saying that the deal would need to be studied. He has been complimentary towards the Ellisons in public, but also said that that deal would need to be examined. And so he's in a situation that he probably loves right now where assuming that one of these deals gets to the regulatory stage, he gets to play a little bit of kingmaker, where he's going to use his power and authority to try to influence the behaviors of these two very powerful companies.

[Jamie Poisson]

I saw the Guardian was reporting that White House officials have discussed their preference for Paramount to win the bid internally and that, like, a White House official was discussing axing certain CNN hosts with, with Ellison, which is, you know, highly un.

Last week, actress and activist Jane Fonda wrote this op ed ahead of Netflix's announcement. In it, she said, we don't know yet which company will buy Warner Brothers Discovery, but we do know what's at stake. Our jobs are creative freedom and the constitutional promise that every American has the right to speak, report, criticize, satirize, investigate, and imagine without fear. And in a media landscape where more consolidation and another mega merger always seems to be around the corner, is there any hope for, like, a more varied, competitive and free industry? Or do you think it's over?

[Lucas Shah]

I don't think it's over. I mean, the problem with the Jane Fonda op ed is.

She is. She is making the case, which I understand a lot of people in the entertainment business feel or share that it shouldn't be sold at all. Right. And I agree that if I were a producer, I would rather there be more buyers, more outlets. I don't really know what you're supposed to tell the board or shareholders of a company if someone is coming around and offering them a lot of money to buy it. Right. It's sort of their fiduciary duty to do that.

So I don't. I guess I don't know that the sale of Warner Brothers.

Represents the demise of the entertainment business. I think what we're seeing and what is hard for a lot of people who work in the industry to accept is that the traditional film and television business.

Kind of share of the. Of the culture business is shrinking. Right. It has more competition from gaming, from social media, from all these other places. And if your industry is kind of flat to down, what tends to happen is it consolidates because.

It'S just the easiest way for the players to keep growing and to survive. Is there some way that, like, we could wave a magic wand and have there be 10, 15, 20 thriving independent companies? That would be really interesting to see. But I guess what I would like to see for that to happen is like, instead of producers lamenting what is happening and trying to stop it, I'd like to see them kind of propose a real alternative and say, this is what we could do to make the industry more vibrant in the way that we want it to be.

[Jamie Poisson]

That feels like a good place for us to end. Lucas, this is great. Thank you so much.

[Lucas Shah]

Yeah, thanks for having me.

[Jamie Poisson]

All right, that's all for today. I'm Jamie Poisson. Thanks so much for listening. Talk to you tomorrow.

[Lucas Shah]

For more cbc podcasts, go to cbc ca podcasts.