Podcast Summary: Front Burner – "Trump's Campaign of Legal Revenge"

Host: Jamie Poisson
Guest: Benjamin Wittes, Editor-in-Chief of Lawfare, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution
Release Date: October 21, 2025

Overview

This episode examines former U.S. President Donald Trump’s unprecedented campaign to use the legal system as a tool of political retribution against his perceived enemies. Jamie Poisson speaks with Benjamin Wittes about the wave of indictments, investigations, and lawsuits targeting former federal officials, political rivals, and institutions. The conversation dissects specific cases, analyzes their merit, considers the broader implications for American democracy, and compares the current climate with historical norms.

Main Discussion Points

1. The Backdrop: Trump’s Legal Battles and Claims of a Witch Hunt

• Trump's Retaliation Narrative: Trump and his supporters have long claimed he’s the victim of a political "witch hunt," citing the numerous investigations and charges brought against him, some of which were serious and others more trivial.
  • Quote: "You know, there are two reasons why you can have a lot of investigative activity directed against you. One is that... people are vindictive, and the other is that you did a lot of stuff that required investigation. And Trump was definitely in the latter category, at least in my opinion." — Benjamin Wittes [04:20]
• Democratic Motivations: Some Democratic prosecutors genuinely investigated crimes; others hoped legal jeopardy would end Trump's political career.
  • Quote: "There is a political dimension to the... prosecution’s. I don't want to make it sound like that means it shouldn't have happened. I think most of the cases brought against him were well founded..." — Benjamin Wittes [04:53]

2. The Root of Trump's "Revenge Campaign": The Russia Investigation

• Origin of Trump’s Fury: Wittes argues the special counsel’s Russia probe, despite never charging Trump, profoundly shaped his sense of grievance and motivation for retribution.
  • Quote: "It was a case that was never brought against him, which was the Russia investigation... He still wants revenge against Jim Comey, who never brought a case against him." — Benjamin Wittes [06:11]

3. Case Studies in Retaliation

a) James Comey – Alleged Perjury

• Trump's DOJ Action: Trump’s administration pressed the new U.S. Attorney in Virginia to indict former FBI Director James Comey, overruling staff who refused to participate.
• Political Motivation:
  • Quote: "There is, you know, a substantial, one might even say overwhelming element of revenge in that desire." — Benjamin Wittes [09:19]
• Comey’s Defense: Claims malicious, politically motivated prosecution, lack of factual basis, and possible illegality of the prosecutor’s appointment [10:30–11:10].

b) John Bolton – Mishandling Classified Information

• Bolton's Fallout: Bolton is indicted for alleged mishandling and transmission of national defense information after falling out with Trump and publishing a tell-all memoir.
• Mixed Merits: Wittes judges the case to be strong if allegations are true, but impossible to fully separate from political vendetta.
  • Quote: "There are elements of this indictment that, like the Comey and James indictments, are impossible to separate from the fact that the President hates the accused very personally..." — Benjamin Wittes [12:08]

c) Letitia James – Mortgage Fraud

• Tit-for-Tat Retaliation: After NY Attorney General Letitia James pursued a civil fraud case against Trump, Trump's DOJ indicts her for mortgage fraud.
• Kafkaesque Pattern:
  • Quote: "Letitia James accuses you of mortgage fraud. So you accuse her of mortgage fraud. So there's that." — Benjamin Wittes [14:35]
• Systematic Search for Pretexts: Trump’s allies reportedly comb the mortgage records of his enemies looking for errors to define as fraud [15:47–15:58].

4. Broader Legal Offensive Against Institutions

• Media Lawsuits: Trump sues The New York Times for $15 billion for alleged defamation. Although the case is expected to be dismissed, it forces the paper to litigate, and some other outlets have settled.
  • Quote: "This is another pressure tactic... It will win this case, but it will have to litigate this case." — Benjamin Wittes [17:19]
• Corporate & Academic Targets: Trump’s administration has also targeted law firms and universities for perceived antagonism, echoing the same retributive logic.

5. Historic Departure and Risks of Escalation

• No Precedent:
  • Quote: "There is no previous example that I know of of... going after universities or law firms... targeting his political foes with criminal prosecution with, you know, zero merit." — Benjamin Wittes [20:50]
• Dismantling the "Civic Myth": Previous administrations, even Nixon’s, did not overtly weaponize justice against enemies.
• Potential for Escalation: Wittes worries this campaign could spark a retributive cycle, with future administrations tempted to retaliate in kind.
  • Quote: "It raises the risk that the next administration will respond in kind. My hope is that the response to this... will be harsh enough that the incentive to respond in kind will be minimal." — Benjamin Wittes [22:23]

6. Checks and Safeguards

• Confidence in Courts: Wittes is “very confident” courts will ultimately reject meritless cases, but is concerned about the damage done by simply putting targets through the ordeal.
  • Quote: "Do I think it is outrageous that she has to be [vindicated]? Yes." [23:24]
• Deterrence through Accountability: Wittes argues that simply being acquitted isn't enough—lawyers who bring frivolous cases must face professional consequences so the behavior isn’t repeated [24:08].

7. What’s Next? Expansion of Targets

• Further Prosecutions Likely: Trump has publicly stated desires to indict further enemies, such as Adam Schiff and liberal philanthropic organizations (Soros, Ford, MacArthur Foundations).
• Expanding Beyond the Powerful: Concern that less-resourced individuals, including activists and protesters, will increasingly become targets [25:41–27:26].

Notable Quotes & Timestamps

• “Trump was definitely in the latter category, at least in my opinion.” — Benjamin Wittes [04:20]
• On political motivations:
  "I think there were professional prosecutors who believed... they were careful to avoid interfering in political processes. And then there were... people in the political arena who were delighted..." [04:53]
• On revenge against Comey:
  “It’s not an accident that ... he still wants revenge against Jim Comey, who never brought a case against him.” — Wittes [07:05]
• Weaponizing process as punishment:
  “They see value in putting people through the wringer, irrespective of whether they expect to win.” — Wittes [24:08]
• Mass targeting:
  "If every time you find a mistake... you define that as fraud and you indict somebody, well, you can indict a lot of people that way." — Wittes [15:58]
• On the historic break:
  "There is no previous example that I know of... targeting his political foes with criminal prosecution with zero merit." — Wittes [20:50]

Timeline of Key Segments

• 01:06–04:43: Discussion of Trump’s own legal troubles/the "witch hunt" narrative
• 05:57–08:20: The roots of Trump's retributive mindset, focusing on the Russia probe
• 08:20–11:17: The Comey case as the first major instance of legal revenge
• 11:17–13:59: Indictment of John Bolton
• 13:59–16:35: Indictment of Letitia James; pattern of weaponizing legal pretexts
• 16:35–19:37: Targeting of media, legal, and academic institutions
• 20:41–22:17: Historical context—departure from previous norms; "civic myth" of impartial justice
• 22:17–25:04: Prospects for escalation; courts as safeguard; the importance of real deterrents
• 25:04–27:26: Outlook for new targets, risks for ordinary citizens/activists

Closing Thoughts

Benjamin Wittes describes Trump’s campaign of legal retaliation as a radical break with American political norms, rooted in a sense of personal grievance and retribution. While courts are likely to ultimately reject many of the cases as meritless, the process itself is used as punishment and intimidation—a tactic that erodes trust in impartial justice and threatens a cycle of political score-settling. The conversation ends with a warning: the list of targets is growing, and the risks are highest for those least able to defend themselves.

For more Canadian and international news analysis, subscribe to Front Burner from CBC.