
Hosted by Gideon Korrell · EN

Gideon Korrell explains why the ’637 patent failed under Alice, highlighting risks of functional claims and lack of technical detail.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell explains how court decisions shape corporate legal and licensing strategies, focusing on how rulings influence contract structures, negotiation dynamics, and risk management approaches, while also exploring how businesses respond to changing legal interpretations and use these insights to develop more adaptable agreements and strengthen long-term strategic planning in evolving regulatory environments

Gideon Korrell explains how Barry v. DePuy Synthes reshapes Daubert, highlighting the balance between judges and juries in expert testimony.

Gideon Korrell explains key legal tensions in Smartrend v Opti-Luxx, covering design patents, claim limits, and the doctrine of equivalents.

Gideon Korrell explains how courts fix obvious patent errors and when judicial claim correction can save claims from indefiniteness.

Gideon Korrell explains why the Federal Circuit refused mandamus in Motorola Solutions and reinforced limits on challenging IPR decisions.

Gideon Korrell explains how subtle wording in patents can redefine claims and decide infringement outcomes in complex cases.

Gideon Korrell explains how secondary evidence, not recusal, became the turning point in a high-stakes IPR appeal decision.

Gideon Korrell explains how prosecution statements in a continuation application can narrow claim scope across an entire patent family.

Gideon Korrell explains how the Federal Circuit applied anti-SLAPP protection to patent filings in the IQE PLC v. Newport Fab, LLC (Tower Semiconductor) ruling.