Loading summary
Matt Lewis
Hello, I'm Matt Lewis. And I'm Dr. Eleanor Jaenega and we're just popping up here to tell you some insider info.
Andrew Boardman
If you would like to listen to.
Holly Fry
Gone Medieval ad free and get early.
Matt Lewis
Access and bonus episodes, sign up to History Hit. With the History Hit subscription, you can also watch hundreds of hours of original documentaries such as my new series on.
Holly Fry
Everyone'S favorite conquerors, the Normans, or my.
Matt Lewis
Recent exploration of the castles that made Britain.
Holly Fry
There's a new release to enjoy every week.
Matt Lewis
Sign up now by visiting historyhit.com subscribe or find the link in the show Notes for this episode.
Kristen
Epic views, waterfall, mists, summit, sunsets. It's all better outside and with alltrails you can discover the best of nature with over 450,000 trails around the world. Download the free app today and find.
Danica Patrick
Your next adventure now at Verizon, we have some big news for your peace of mind. For all our customers, existing and new, we're locking in low prices for three years guaranteed on MyPlan and MyHome. That's future you peace of mind and everyone can save on a brand new phone on MyPlan. When you trade in any phone from one of our top brands, that's new phone peace of mind. Because at Verizon, whether you're already a customer or you're just joining us, we got you. Visit Verizon today. Price guarantee applies to then current base monthly rate. Additional terms and conditions apply for all offers.
Holly Fry
Our Skin Tells a Story Join me, Holly Fry, and a slate of incredible guests as we are all inspired by their journeys with psoriasis. Along with these uplifting and candid personal histories, we take a step back into the bizarre and occasionally poisonous history of our skin and how we take care of it. Whether you're looking for inspiration on your own skincare journey or are curious about the sometimes strange history of how we treat our skin, you'll find genuine, empathetic, transformative conversations here on our skin. Listen to our skin on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Matt Lewis
Hello, I'm Matt Lewis. Welcome to Gone Medieval From History Hit, the podcast that delves into the greatest millennium in human history. We've got the most intriguing mysteries, the gobsmacking details and latest groundbreaking research. From the Vikings to the printing press, from kings to Popes to the Crusades, we cross centuries and continents to delve into rebellions, plots and murders to find the stories, big and small, that tell us how we got here, find out who we really Were with Gone Medieval Foreign welcome to this episode of Gone Medieval. I'm Matt Lewis. The death of a medieval king is always a moment of crisis, upheaval and, for some people, opportunity. In the complex and superheated politics of England in 1471, this was particularly true. Two dynasties, the House of Lancaster and the House of York, are vying for the crown. Only one can win. And in the spring of 1471, it looks like it's York and its patriarch, King Edward iv. He's taken back the crown he'd lost six months earlier. He's destroyed his enemies on the battlefield and he's ensured that the only heir of Lancaster is dead. Now all that remains is the aging King Henry Village, in many ways the antithesis of Edward, but also his greatest remaining problem. When Edward got back to London after the Battle of Tewkesbury, keen to move on from the blood, sweat and turmoil, he might have been shocked and disturbed at what had been happening there. It's a moment that's often glossed over. But there was a siege of London by a famous soldier and it might just have sealed the fate of poor Henry. Today's guest is Andrew Boardman, a medieval military historian whose latest book, the Rose, the Bastard and the Saint King the Murder of Henry vi, is out now and Andrew is going to help us uncover this important but overlooked moment in the wars of the Roses. Welcome to God Medieval Andrew. It's fantastic to have you with us.
Andrew Boardman
Thanks for inviting me, Matt. Great to be here.
Matt Lewis
I'm very much looking forward to get stuck into some of my favourite bits of history in the wars of the Roses. It's gonna be really interesting. I wonder if you could just paint the scene for us a little bit to get us started. We're in 1471. What is going on? Why is this a moment of crisis?
Andrew Boardman
Well, we're still in the wars of the Roses. He's the first Yorkish king. He's been driven into exile by Warwick, his former friend. And Warwick is restored Henry VI to the throne, which brings in a period of about six months, which is known as the Readption, where Henry VI is on the throne and Warwick is controlling him to a certain extent. So that's in 1470, with Edward being over in Burgundy. He's in a position where he obviously wants to come back to England and is trying to canvass some support. He eventually does that. He lands back in England again and he marches on London. There's a couple of things that happen in between that period, but basically he marches on London Warwick follows him with an army. Edward marches out of London, fights the Battle of Barney, Warwick is killed, and then soon after that, Queen Margaret, who has plotted with Warwick before, this time including plotting the. What I call the pincer movement, which is Falkenberg's involvement on the sea, and Warwick and the Commons of Kent, which is canvassed with propaganda to march on London and then overwhelm Edward again. When Margaret lands, she marches into England, Edward marches out of London, they fight the Battle of Tewkesbury. Henry's heir, Prince Edward, is killed on the battlefield, and then Edward marches on Coventry, unaware that there's something happening in London.
Matt Lewis
I mean, you've just explained something in under three minutes that I would normally take about an hour to explain to anybody. The re adeption is such a fascinating, complex period, and I think even in the context of the time, in terms of medieval England and even in terms of the wars of the Roses, this is a really frantic moment where the. The throne is changing hands at a new pace, isn't it? Kind of. Edward's been on the throne for 10 years, he's kicked off for six months, and Henry's back and then Edward's back again. And you've got this kind of increasingly uncertain, fragile situation. You know, we know that eventually Edward will. Will win out of this, but it must have been pretty unclear to anyone in 1471 precisely what was going next.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah, I mean, there was two Kings. So Henry VI, he'd been in prison since 1465, so he'd been in the Tower of London, not in a cell, but locked up in apartments. And so Henry VI is in the Tower, Edward has been exiled, so there's two kings there and then there's Warwick in the middle, scheming which way it will fall.
Matt Lewis
Yeah.
Andrew Boardman
And as you say, at that time it was very uncertain which way that would go.
Matt Lewis
We're going to talk about the 1471 siege of London, which is the focus of your book. The events that take place in London in 1471 while Edward is gone on that campaign around the Battle of Tewkesbury. And I wonder if you could tell us to start off with. I think this is a moment that quite often gets kind of glossed over, passed over. People never seem to spend much time thinking about what happened and how important it was. Why do you think, given that we're talking about a siege of the capital city, why do you think it gets so little attention?
Andrew Boardman
I'm not too sure, actually, because it's quite a large event. There's the Commons of Kent and Essex, Surrey and Sussex are all up in arms in rebellion. If that isn't a serious crisis, I don't know what isn't. So I think the reason why it's been glossed over, it's not that there isn't enough accounts, because in my book, I do detail a lot of accounts that can support the evidence. So it's not that. It's just that most historians have tended to go straight on to the 12 years of peace after the Battle of Tewkesbury, and they'll obviously mention Henry VI as well. But this is one of the reasons that I got really, really interested in the book. I was looking at that time and look. Looking at what might have happened and what actually happened, because I think what people tend to do is they tend to look at it and gloss over the event and they're not looking too deeply into it, which I wanted to do. I wanted to look into it deeply and see if I could find out what actually happened, not just at this age of London, but to Henry vi, in fact, who killed him.
Matt Lewis
I mean, I often wonder whether it's one of those points at which the King is away, Edward IV is away fighting another battle, which is what everybody is focusing attention on, and it almost becomes just another event. Too much. It's a bit too much complexity to add into the situation. So people tend to just gloss over this and not worry too much about the fact that it happened. But it is a significant moment that has effects and after effects and consequences that we need to think about if we want to properly understand what's happening at this point in the wars of the Roses.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah, I think you're right there. It's just these things are happening all at the same time.
Matt Lewis
Yeah.
Andrew Boardman
So there's a simultaneous sequence of events that are happening. It isn't one thing after another. It isn't like Barnett and then tube spray. It's like at the same time as Tewkesbury's been for things are happening in Kent and things are happening in London and Edward is unaware of it.
Matt Lewis
Yeah.
Andrew Boardman
Which is interesting. I found that really interesting that the King wasn't really aware what was going on.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, yeah. It must have been a bit of a shock for him. Could you introduce us to the main protagonists when we're talking about the siege of London, when we get to the actual siege, who are the main opposing forces?
Andrew Boardman
Right, so outside London, you've basically got Falkenberg, Thomas Neville, member of the Neville family, but a bastard. So he wasn't sort of like. It didn't seem to figure much in the wars prior to this event. But I found some evidence that he did actually work with his father and also with the Neville family on the sea, because it was a mariner, it was a pirate basically. So I found quite a lot of evidence that that was happening. So you've got Thomas Neville and then you've got other parts of the country, they're actually leading the rebellion. So in Kent you've got people like Nicholas Font, who's the Lord Mayor of Canterbury. He obviously figures quite a lot in the rebellion. And you have people like Sir Geoffrey Gate and you have people like Sir George Brooke who was involved in the Calais garrison. And you've got then a lot of minor gentry in the south that are leading that particular rebellion. On the other side, in London itself, you've basically got the people that, that Edward IV left in London and didn't take to Tewkesbury. So you've got some elder gentlemen who are trying to organize the hero of Falkenberg's rebellion. They try to organize themselves and they do that to a certain extent. But I fall down on the side of the aldermen and the Lord Mayor of London as being responsible for, for actually protecting London. But you've got the Earl of Essex, for instance, he's quite old. You've got Lord Dudley, who's quite old, you've got Lord Duras, who's. He didn't actually go. And then you've got the main guy, which is Lord Rivers. Lord Rivers was wounded at the Battle of Barnet. Whether that is the reason why he didn't go to Tewkesbury, I'm not sure. But Lord Rivers is the man that we look to as being the savior of London. But whether that's true or not, he's open to debate. So that's the two sides.
Matt Lewis
We'll find out. And Lord Rivers is, is Anthony Woodville, who is Edward IV's queen's brother. So he's kind of the Yorkist King's brother in law who has remained behind in London, as you say, for some reason or another. And I wonder if you could talk us through a little bit more about who Thomas Neville is. So we've mentioned that he's the son of Lord Falkenberg. Where does that put him in the Neville family? What relation is he to Warwick, who people may well be better acquainted with?
Andrew Boardman
Well, I mean, basically he's the cousin, so we've been a cousin. But a bastard is probably not seen. There's no detriment there. But it's just that Thomas can't really inherit property. It's a sad state of affairs really. But he can obviously marry well, he can become a soldier, it can become part of the clergy and get help. But I think, I believe that the, the Neville family did help Thomas and his brother because of course, Lord Falkenberg had two bastard children, William and Thomas, who worked together. And we don't hear very much of William. We don't hear very much of Thomas, but we don't hear very much of William. And he does figure in the story. So if I go back a little bit, Lord Falkenberg was like Edward IV's right hand man. He was an elderly man even when he fought at Towton and he was in charge of the archers at Towton. And he more or less won, I believe he more or less won Edward the throne. Now, his bastard children then obviously not inheriting any property because after Falkenberg wins it, Towton with Edward, he becomes Earl of Kent. But that doesn't mean very much to Thomas. But I believe that Lord Falkenberg gave his bastard children quite a good living. We find out that, okay, Thomas is on the sea, he becomes a pirate. But Warwick was a pirate as well, and so was his father, Dale of Sellsbridger. They were all at sea and all raiding foreign shipping, which was a nuisance to England, an absolute nuisance, because foreign trade, you know, was the thing that needed to be pursued. And if you have pirates in the English Channel, for instance, then you've got the real problem. So Thomas is coming from that angle because he is Lord Falkenberg's son. But Lord Falkenberg dies in 1464. 63. 64. In the north of England.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, yeah.
Andrew Boardman
So then Lord Falkenberg, he can't pass any title on, but Thomas Falkenberg just moves towards Warwick and becomes Warwick's man. And that's one of the reasons why the siege happened, because Warwick formulated a plan involving Thomas, involving Queen Margaret coming back to England. And I think that's the crux of it really, that I reckon, without going to fiction, that Falkenberg, you know, was pleased to be under Warwick's tuition, if you like.
Matt Lewis
Yeah. I always think of Warwick, whatever he may or may not have been, he must have been this kind of glittering, famous figure that everybody wanted to be like. You know, he was a famous soldier, he's a famous pirate, he's a famous general. He has loads and loads of money, this lavish hospitality. Whether you think he's a good guy Or a bad guy. He must be someone that everybody wanted to be around, that kind of magnet at the center of society.
Andrew Boardman
But it was the chief of propaganda. I mean, he knew how to handle the Commons in Kent, for instance, and he knew how to. He had these beautiful speeches we hear about in the chronicles, and he delivers these speeches and appeals to the common people.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, yeah.
Andrew Boardman
So by appearing appealing to the common man in a place like Kent, for instance, which had no real nobles that were looking after certain districts, then it became very well liked in Kent.
Matt Lewis
Yeah. And you mentioned then that there was a kind of a plan that was behind Thomas Neville's assault on London. What was Thomas Neville doing? Why does he attack London? What's he hoping to achieve?
Andrew Boardman
He's hoping that he will free Henry VI from the Tower. Then what will happen is then that will release a lot of closet Lancastrians in London to take London march on Edward, who's at that time in Coventry, and win back the throne. But there was a spanner in the works, because obviously, as I said, Warwick got killed at the Battle of Barney, which Falkenberg knew about, but it didn't dissuade him from attacking London. He followed what Warwick wanted him to do. Nevertheless, it didn't bank on Edward winning at Tewkesbury. Even London only got news of that right at the last minute, when Falkenberg and his rebels were encamped on Blackheath. So that would have come as a bombshell.
Matt Lewis
Yeah. And I always imagine people in London at this time must have been so uncertain about what they should do, because if Edward wins at Tewkesbury, he's obviously going to be unhappy if they haven't resisted a siege by a relation of Warwick in favour of the Lancastrians. But if Edward loses and it's a Lancastrian army with Margaret and Prince Edward who turn up in London, they're going to be fuming if they've held out against the Lancastrians. So you must have been inside those walls with no real concrete news, thinking, there's two moves I can make. One will be disastrous and I don't know which one it is.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah, this is really interesting. I found it interesting that there was certain polarities in London itself behind the walls. So you've got Yorkist and Lancastrians behind the walls thinking, as you say, what's going to happen? And then you've got thousands, literally thousands of Commons outside the walls, hoping to get in and free Henry vi. So there's a lot of things happening all at once. Which are both political and military and.
Matt Lewis
Life and death for the people who are caught up in the middle of it potentially as well.
Andrew Boardman
Absolutely.
Matt Lewis
So how does the siege begin? What does Thomas initially do as he approaches London?
Andrew Boardman
Thomas relying on the. On an Essex contingent as well, because the Essex men and women were up in arms at the same time as he was able to raise a lot of people in Kent. There was obviously a parallel situation going on where he was coordinating what was happening in Essex as well as what was happening in Kent. And he matched with roughly 10,000 rebels to Blackheath. I mean, it does say in the Chronicles 20,000, but it tends to be over exaggerated. But at least 10,000, which is much bigger than Cage Rebellion in 1450 and Cage Rebellion were big enough. There's a lot of parallels between Falkenburg Rebellion and Cage Rebellion as well. And when Falkenberg and his men got to Sittingbourne, he sent a letter to the Commonality in London and said, this is what I want to do. I want to march through London and we won't do anything, we won't pillage, we won't take anything without paying for it. Then we're going to march on and defeat Edward. But of course he was lying. What he wanted to do, according to the Chronicles, again, is he wanting to march and attack London, free Henry from the Tower and then release the Lancastrians and march on Edward with Lancastrian support.
Matt Lewis
So he's telling London he's not going to do any harm, but there's a strong suspicion that that's not entirely true and that he is actually trying to turn London over to the Lancastrians at a point where it's, it's hedging its bets and trying not to come down too heavily on one side or the other. So I mean, what actually happens when he gets to London then? Does he kind of knock on the gates and say, let me in? And they say no, they basically march.
Andrew Boardman
Onto Blackheath, they create a camp and they receive a message back from the Commonality in the Lord Mayor saying, sorry, Falkenberg, but you're not going to come in. And they bar the gates. So they bar London Bridge, they bar all the gates to London and they raised the militias within London. So all these militias pre made by the aldermen who are in charge of the 26 districts in London. And Falkenberg's there at London Gate, so wonders what he's going to do. He basically decides to tell them or to let them know that he means business. So he attacks London Bridge. He attacks London Bridge and he attacks the Great Stone Gate, which is on Southwark. Attacks that fires. It can't get in because the troops are doing all sorts. They're pouring boiling oil on the attackers there. They've got plenty of ordinance there. They've got artillery. And Forkoberg retreats, thinks again, and decides to march on Kingston, which is the next bridge up the River Thames. He gets to the River Thames and he meets Lord Rivers, who has taken lots of troops up the Thames by barge. And again Falkenberg. Then he gets bamboozled, really, because Ruther says, watch out, because Edward's on his way and he's got a large army and you don't stand a chance. So Falkenberg.
Matt Lewis
Did either of them know if that was true at that point? Is that an empty threat from Rivers? Is he playing a game?
Andrew Boardman
I think it's an empty threat because at that time, if you look at the dates, Edward was still in Coventry. So we know that by just the dates. I think at this point, Edward does know what's happening because a rider's gone out. And we know that a rider arrived in Coventry. And the rider, the messenger told them that London's on fire because the bridge, of course, is obviously burning at that time. Rivers saying, be careful, you know, submit to Edward. You're not going to get into London because the lord Mayor's not going to allow it again tomorrow.
Matt Lewis
And imagine if you're Falkenberg by this point, you feel like maybe you've gone too far to just back down. You know, what are his options, really?
Andrew Boardman
He knows that Edward has won a Chebe spray on the letter that came from the mayor to him on Blackheath. There was a copy of Edward's letter that Edward sent to London to say, look, I've won at Chicksbury and I've executed lots of Lancastrians. So at that point, I think Falkenberg is thinking, well, maybe I should rethink the situation. In fact, I think he gets told by some of the people that are with him, Nicholas Fawn, for instance, I think he's probably thinking, listen, you know, there's 10,000 people here. You know, they're all getting a bit nervous, you know. So I think what Falkenberg then decides to do, and it's written in the Chronicles that he takes his army back to London Bridge and decides to split it up. So he splits the army up into two sections. He uses his ships to ferry men across onto the Essex side. He puts that army in charge of two men who we know only as Spicing and Quinton and they link up with the Essex rebels and they are told that we're going to attack London in sync. And I think that is what Falkenberg's next move was. He decided to do a double attack on London. But these are happening simultaneously and we know that from the London Chronicle, that these happened both simultaneously on the 14th of May.
Matt Lewis
So Falkenberg is, you know, he's all in now, both feet in. He's going for an all out assault on London.
Andrew Boardman
London Bridge again.
Matt Lewis
What happens? How, how close does he come to any kind of success?
Andrew Boardman
Very close. He actually gets through London Bridge to the centre of London Bridge to the Drawbridge Tower. Now the drawbridge is up, so he can't get any further than that. But of course London Bridge is burning at this time. There's nearly 100 odd houses that have been fired and destroyed, all fallen into the Thames, but he can't get any further than that. And again he gets stopped by Sir Ralph Jocelyn, who's one of the men who figures quite prominently in the London Bridge battle. In fact, he becomes Lord Mayor after the event. So he does quite well there, I think. But as these two things are happening over on the other side of the Thames, you've got an attack on Algate, Bishopsgate and Cripplegate just on the east side of London. And again houses are fired, the walls get stormed. It's just mayhem, you know, I mean, the people in London must have been wondering what was going to happen. And by that time, of course, cannons had been unloaded from the ships from Falkenberg ships. Falkenberg has gone into like a mode of, well, we'll just storm London and destroy it. So he lines all these serpentine guns on the south bank and it starts sharing them.
Matt Lewis
So he's bombarding London walls and presumably London is firing back at him.
Andrew Boardman
And London's firing back. Yeah, absolutely. But people are getting killed in the streets. So it's an epic. It's an epic siege which lasts two days. There's a lot of turning points which you can look at and look at the chronicles and think, well, who was commanding here? And it does actually say who was commanding at certain points. And then you can look and think, well, you know, is that true? But they actually describe what these people are wearing. So these are like eyewitnesses. So which is, which is fantastic for the wars of the Roses because you've got white eyewitnesses that are telling you what's happening in a battle which is unusual foreign.
Kristen
Hey Kristen, how's it tracking.
F
With Carvana Value Tracker?
Andrew Boardman
What else?
F
Oh, it's tracking, in fact. Value surge alert.
Kristen
Trucks up 2.5%, vans down 1.7, just as predicted. So we gonna I don't know.
F
Could sell could hold the power to.
Andrew Boardman
Always know our car's work.
Kristen
Exhilarating, isn't it? Tracking Always know your car's worth with Carvana Value Tracker. Out here, it's not only the amazing views, but the way time stretches out a little longer, how laughter bellows louder among friends, and how the breeze hits just right at the summit. With Alltrails, you can discover and experience the best of nature. With over 450,000 trails worldwide and navigation right at your fingertips, find your outside with Alltrails. Download the free app today and find your next outdoor adventure.
Danica Patrick
USAA knows dynamic duos can save the day like superheroes and sidekicks or auto and home insurance. With usaa, you can bundle your auto and home and save up to 10%. Tap the banner to learn more and get a cool', @usaa.com Bundle restrictions apply.
Matt Lewis
Coverage varies by plan.
Kristen
View contracts and exclusions@endurancewarranty.com if you're driving.
F
A car or truck with an expired warranty and suddenly lost your transmission or needed a full engine repair, would a $4,000 repair bill leave you stranded? I'm Danica Patrick. Don't get caught off guard with a vehicle breakdown. Choose the company I trust, Endurance, no matter the mileage. If your vehicle is less than 20 years old, endurance offers comprehensive auto protection plans for any budget, protection on the drivetrain, electrical transmission, AC and more, plus benefits like 24. 7 roadside assistance and rental car reimbursement. On any plan, Endurance handles everything from making the claim through the repair process to paying the certified mechanic of your choice. Don't get caught off guard with a vehicle breakdown. Act now and get one. One full year of elite benefits, a $2,000 value free.
Andrew Boardman
Visit endurance warranty.com for your fast free quote today. That's endurance warranty.com.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, I wonder what to what extent Falkenberg was relying on the fact that you know Warwick. As you said, master of propaganda, widely loved by the people. Warwick in particular was always welcomed into London in previous times. You know, whenever he bought a Yorkist army and they were assaulting the Lancastrians, London tended to throw its gates open to the Yorkists. And I wonder whether Thomas Falkenberg was thinking he would get the same kind of treatment as someone close to Warwick. But it seems like when he didn't get that falling straight back on. On a military solution kind of alienates London from him. He doesn't really give them any option but to defend themselves and fire back at him and treat him as an enemy.
Andrew Boardman
I think that's absolutely right. I mean, the fact that Falkenberg was in a situation on Blackheath when he first arrived and the Lord Mayor was called John Stockton, he told him, basically, you're not coming into London. And the Londoners were fearful that it was going to be 1450 Jack Cage Rebellion all over again. So they would get into London, there was execute nobles, they would pillage the streets. From that point onwards the Londoners had the advantage because of course what they were doing is they were fighting for the homes and the families, whereas Falkenberg was leading a rebellion. And this is what I think squared it for Falkenberg and why it didn't actually get into London, because the Londoners fought tooth and nail.
Matt Lewis
So you've said we've got two days of a siege, we've got London on fire, London Bridge on fire, we've got cannon pounding away on both sides of the River Thames. How does it come to an end? Is there a major turning point or is this just a case of two days in and no one's getting anywhere?
Andrew Boardman
No, I think Falkenberg is. The Chronicle is the. Like an eyewitness. One of the London chronicles says that Falkenberg retreats from London Bridge and he gets chased. He gets chased along the Thames and he ends up back at Blackheath with a few of his supporters, but they leave him alone. Then incredibly, all this time Algate is being pounded and the Essex rebels almost get into London. In fact, they get to the other side of Algate. But then what happens is the portcullises come down on top of the troops underneath the bridge and they get trapped. And no matter what happened then, because the portcullises were down, there were two port collises in Algate. Then Falkenberg's men, under Spicing and Quintin, retreat back to Saint Bottles Church. And at that point there's also an escalade from the Tower of London led by rivers with horsemen that hit the rebels in the flank. And that was the end for the rebels really. They get chased right up to Stadney and leave London burning. Leave London in flames. But to give the Londoners credit, if they hadn't have stopped that particular attack, then it would have been quite easy for the rebels to get down to London Bridge, free Henry VI and Complete the mission. Yeah.
Matt Lewis
So it did come quite close to success.
Andrew Boardman
It's very close.
Matt Lewis
Thomas Neville has made it back to Blackheath. They appear to be leaving him alone. They've chased him that far. What happens to him in the aftermath of all of this?
Andrew Boardman
I think it. I think it gets word then that Edward has dispatched riders, quite a big contingent of riders,500, to come down from Coventry to London and to protect London, because at that point nobody knows what's happening, whether Falkenberg has managed to get into the capital or not. And then Ed would be after that with the main army. And I think Parkerberg gets wind of this. It deserts everybody on Blackheath and he rides to Rochester first, then to Sandwich, and he instructs his fleet to arrive in Sandwich so that he can probably use that as a bargaining, seemingly.
Matt Lewis
Edward then, when he gets back to London and finds out that this, you know, wrote. Because, I mean, the. The Nevilles are also cousins of Edward iv, You know, they're. Falkenberg is a cousin of the King, part of a family that used to be loyal to him and no longer is. This guy's kind of set fire to London, done his best to take it in the name of, or with the intention of freeing Henry vi. Presumably Edward's not going to let it lie. Presumably he's got it. He's got to sort Falkenberg out now.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah. And it's. It's Richard, Duke of Gloucester, that gets to London first. So Rich is in charge of the power that comes to London. He gets into London, thinks to himself, where's the rebels? Because they've all been beaten. So he congratulates everybody, of course, then goes to the Tower and to make sure that Henry's still there. And then he obviously does a recce of attempts to make sure that all the rebels have dispersed and then goes back to London to wait for his brother. And Edward arrives and the first thing he does on the 22nd of May is. Is Knight, everybody in the Commonality and the aldermen, the sheriffs, ignites them all outside the gates because he knows how close it was.
Matt Lewis
And we're going to come on to what all of this might have meant for Henry VI in a moment. But I wonder if we could just close off Thomas Neville's story. What happens to him in the end?
Andrew Boardman
Thomas is waiting patiently because everybody's deserted him. A lot of the Calais contingent have gone back over to Calais as rebels, but Thomas is left in Sandwich. So Edward and his brother Gloucester ride out with an army and put it to Falkenberg that if he surrenders, then he will be given a pardon.
Matt Lewis
Incredibly, sounds a little bit too good to be true.
Andrew Boardman
If you look at it from Edward's point of view. He wants his fleet back. There's 47 ships in Sandwich which could have been fired, they could have been destroyed. So he wants his fleet back and is willing to do that if Falkenberg submits to him. So he does and he's given a pardon. So Falkenberg, then he gets the freedom of the. Of the city. He lives in Westminster for quite a while the same year. And then he gets a summons with Gloucester to go to the north and work with Gloucester in the north, managing the north. But then Falkenberg reverts back to his old ways and he escapes with his brother and goes back to sea. He puts him at Southampton and he gets captured again, gets sent north again with Gloucester, and then he gets executed by Gloucester as constable of London.
Matt Lewis
Yeah.
Andrew Boardman
So in effect, as a rebel against his just desserts, but you can't help feeling some sympathy for him. Yes.
Matt Lewis
It's so tricky when people are, you know, they engage in these acts of rebellion. They somehow managed to get pardoned. And instead of thinking, I have had the luckiest escape that anyone ever had, I'm going to sit in front of a fire with my feet up for the rest of my days and be grateful.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah.
Matt Lewis
They seem, you know, determined, almost compelled to go back into rebellion that will ultimately lead to them being executed. It's slightly. I don't. I find it hard to make sense of it, to be honest.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah. That's the amazing thing about it, really. I think that a lot of the time it's to do with politics. So, for instance, after Towton, for instance, if we go back 10 years in the wars of the Roses, Edward tries to make friends with the north, so he'll do anything to get some support. So he pardons lots and lots of people. If you look at London, for instance, he's got quite a lot of sympathy as Falkenberg, even though he's attacked London, he's got a lot of sympathy in Kent because, of course, everybody's gone back to the homes and there's been a long list of people that are getting executed because they committed treason. So there's politics where Edward is unsure what to do with Falkenberg because he doesn't want another rising, he doesn't want anything else to happen in Kent, he don't want any more trouble. So I think that's one of the reasons why the pardons are there to placate the commons in this instance or in Towson's instance, to placate the nobles, the Northern nobles, which of course it never did, it never placated them.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, Edward IV seems quite keen on giving people second chances, but it rarely seems to work for him.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah, unfortunately he's quite astute, it's quite clever. But in the wars of the Roses, as we know, there's lots of twists and turns which go against that.
Danica Patrick
Now at Verizon, we have some big news for your peace of mind. For all our customers, existing and new, we're locking in low prices for three years guaranteed on MyPlan and my home, that's future you peace of mind. And everyone can save on a brand new phone on MyPlan. When you trade in any phone from one of our top brands, that's new phone piece of mind. Because at Verizon, whether you're already a customer or you're just joining us, we got you. Visit Verizon today. Price guarantee applies to then current base monthly rate. Additional terms and conditions apply for all offers.
Kristen
Out here we feel things. The sore calves that lead to epic views, the cool waterfall mist during a hot hike and the breeze that hits just right at the summit. But hey, don't just listen to us. Experience it for yourself. Come Alltrails makes it easy to discover the best of the outdoors. With more than 450,000 trails around the world, points of interest along the trail and offline maps for always on navigation. Download the free app today and find your next outdoor adventure.
Matt Lewis
I wonder if we could just kind of close off Thomas's story with a thought about what his tale tells us about illegitimate children during this period you mentioned he's not in a position where he can inherit anything and that makes him to some extent slightly more dangerous. He's got much less to lose than some of his other relatives who could be attainted and could lose lots of land. But he does seem to have been, you know, involved by the Neville family in military activity and some of their political activity and things. So is he useful to the Neville family but somehow more dangerous to Edward once he rebels because he's illegitimate?
Andrew Boardman
In retrospect, I think Thomas was a true rebel. It was a rebel with a cause. If you like Warwick's cause, he was recruited by Warwick. Warwick said that he was the captain of Kent and of the fleet. So he's like the admiral of Warwick's large fleet. What more do you want as a rebel? He's Got a force that he can move around the country carrying guns and troops. So it's massive. It's a massive appointment for Falkenberg. And he was true to Warwick right to the end. Yeah. He had his doubts about whether he should attack London, which he did anyway. But once Warwick was killed and he went, he followed through. You got to give him credit there. He could have gone home.
Matt Lewis
He's a fascinating character that people don't know well enough, I don't think.
Andrew Boardman
Absolutely.
Matt Lewis
And I guess we should then get on to the kind of, the final part of the three parts of your title, which is our Saint King.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah, the juicy stuff.
Matt Lewis
I wonder how much of an impact you think this episode of the siege of London has on what happens to Henry vi. Does it really drive home for Edward the problem of having Henry sat there as a potential figurehead for everyone else and kind of compel him to deal with Henry?
Andrew Boardman
Yes, massive, massively is the two, the two things, the siege of London and the death of Henry are the same. There isn't one without the other. Although when Edward came back to London, he must have thought to himself, I'm not going to have this again. This is not going to happen. I've got rebellions up and down the country, but I need to do something with Henry. I think he was willing to let Henry live right from 1465, I think he was willing to let Henry live, I suppose a holy man. I've got no other word for it really. But politically he was so important, even though he was in, he was in prison, it was so important just sitting there in prison. It was massively important to the wars of the Roses up until that point.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, I guess any attempt at rebellion has a kind of default figurehead that they can turn to in opposition to Edward. Anyone who decides on Monday morning that actually they don't like Edward anymore has a ready made replacement they can transfer their allegiance to. And that's always going to be a problem for Edward if he's trying to be tough.
Andrew Boardman
Now I thought in the book, when I first started researching this five years ago, it was a case of, yeah, of course Edward's going to do that. Of course Edward's going to execute the ex king. But then I thought to myself, is there anything else? Is there something else that I'm missing? And the first thing was the siege of London. That had massive implications. And the second thing was Henry himself. Henry maybe died, wasn't executed, but maybe he did die of melancholy, grief, anger as the arrival. Edwards official chronicle tells us Is it that, or is it that someone went in, like, Gloucester and killed him with a sword or a dagger?
Matt Lewis
That's a nice segue into the next question I was going to ask you, because there is this official story that comes out of the Yorkist government that Henry dies of in air quotes. Pure melancholy, you know, when he's told that his son's been killed, his Queen's been captured, his dynasty is over, his cause is done, that he, you know, because of his poor mental health and his. His ailing physical health and the descriptions of him when he comes out of the Tower of London in 1470, that he collapses and dies.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah.
Matt Lewis
Do you think there's any mileage in that, or are we just talking about Yorkist propaganda here?
Andrew Boardman
That's a really good question. I still have my doubts. The only thing I can say is that I do know from two accounts that Queen Margaret, when she arrives with Edward Undergarde, is allowed to go see Henry in the Tower. And it does say that Margaret visited him at that time, that Henry didn't know anything. So he didn't know his son had been killed at Tewkesbury. He obviously knew about the siege because he would have heard it, but he didn't know that his cause was in ruins, that Lancastrians had been executed. He didn't know anything about that. He didn't even know whether he was about to die, because, of course, he must have thought that there's nothing left, there's just me. Is Edward, after all this time, gonna kill me in the Tower of London? So I think he needed to look at the strands from a different angle. What is going on and why Henry might have died of a stroke or a heart attack because he was so weak. He'd been in prison for five, six years and been in communicado. He'd really only got his servants looking after him, which diminished over the years. Yeah.
Matt Lewis
I do tend to feel like the Yorkist story that Henry dies, as you say, of a stroke or a heart attack or. Or just collapses somehow, is kind of too easy to cynically push aside.
Andrew Boardman
I.
Matt Lewis
It's hard to believe it. It does come across as propaganda, but, you know, this is a guy who's been in really poor mental health for 15 years by this point. Who.
Andrew Boardman
The.
Matt Lewis
The descriptions of him in 1470, when he comes out of the Tower, suggest he wasn't being physically cared for very well while he's in Edward's custody. So this guy is a shambles. And I think it's impossible to completely write off the notion that he died of natural causes. Even if you were to think that him being murdered is more likely, Henry has.
Andrew Boardman
If you look into the history of the wars of the Roses, Henry had a disability and we know that he was the Mad King, but he had some disease which I believe was acute intermittent porphyria, which, if you look medically, it's got, like, neurological symptoms. It can cause seizures, confusion, memory loss. Everything points towards this disease or a disease of catatonia, where basically he can't communicate with anyone when he's in this stupor. Now, one of the takeaways from this disease is that you're prone to seizures and heart attack. Now, if Henry obviously got to know about his son's death, Lancaster and fall at Tewkesbury, did he have an heart attack in the Tower and was murder responsible?
Matt Lewis
Yeah. Interesting to wonder about, I guess. I mean, you have subtitled the book the Murder of Henry vi, so where do you fall down? Do you think he's murdered? Rather than being a death by natural.
Andrew Boardman
Causes, I think Edward decided to get rid of him. He was basically too directly involved. He's almost certainly the icon of the Lancastrian cause still. And he had to get rid of him or face another rebellion or face another group of nobles who want to unseat Edward. So I think he's got to get rid of him.
Matt Lewis
And I guess the big barrier up until this point, so Edward keeps Henry in prison for five years. The biggest barrier to doing away with him any earlier, even if Edward had wanted to, is Henry's son. So while there's this young prince out there who might turn out to be more like his granddad, Henry V, who knows what this kid's gonna grow up to be while he's out there? If you kill Henry, what you're doing is renewing the Lancastrian cause in this young prince who is not in Edward's custody at this point. He's in France. So in some ways, keeping Henry alive as this kind of useless figurehead works for Edward. Because if people want to oppose Edward, they've got to follow Henry. But everyone knows Henry's a bit rubbish. But once Prince Edward is gone, his heir is gone, and then you throw in the siege of London, all of this is kind of coming together to force Edward's hand. And now that Prince Edward is gone, he's got the freedom to do it as well.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah, I think Penry was a hostage. It was a hostage situation when he was in prison because of the fact that he was always there. If, for instance, Edward needed to bring him out of the Tower, put him in front of the troops like he did at Barney, for instance, and then get a few more troops, Lancastrian troops, into the army, then it was there. It was there to do that. But it just outlived his usefulness.
Matt Lewis
Yeah. Yeah. It's hard not to feel sorry for him at this point in his own story.
Andrew Boardman
You've got to feel sorry for him. A lot of people say he was mad. I think it was a man that was born in the wrong time.
Matt Lewis
Yeah. Shakespeare famously gives us the wicked Richard, Duke of Gloucester, the future Richard iii, kind of reveling in stabbing Henry to death and doing away with the old king. If Edward has decided this has to be done, do we have any kind of idea, any kind of evidence about who might have done it or how it might have been done?
Andrew Boardman
I think if you look at all the chronicles that mention his death, mention Henry VI's death, the take home from that is that others were there. And I'm putting others in parenthesis, because nearly every chronicle mentions Gloucester, apart from the arrival, which is official Yorkist propaganda. Every chronicle mention these others that were there almost watching as Henry gets killed in the Tower, watching the execution. I believe these others are real. I really do believe they're real. Real. But somebody must have killed him. Somebody must have killed Henry. I don't believe Gloucester did it himself. He had no reason to do it himself. He's no reason to hold the dagger himself. So who did it? And then I started researching who might have done it. And I'm still investigating, but I've come up with quite a few suggestions of who might have done it. But of course, Gloucester was Constable of England. It was only doing his job. If he did organize Henry VI's murder in the Tower, Edward says, I want him killed because of this, because we can't afford this to happen ever again. Gloucester goes off, finds somebody and has it done.
Matt Lewis
So ultimately, the buck has got to stop with Edward.
Andrew Boardman
Yeah. And unfortunately, Gloucester's in the middle, as he usually is. He was tasked with executing Falkenberg, you know, can you get rid of Falkenberg for me, Richard? Yes, I'll get rid of him because he's too dangerous. So he does away with Falkenberg.
Matt Lewis
When you mention that these others are there fairly consistently amongst the chronicles, it does kind of make you wonder whether what we're thinking about here is rather than some kind of dirty scene in Shakespeare where Richard is wickedly ramming a knife into Henry himself because he Wants to. Because he really wants to kill him. Are we looking at here a witnessed execution, maybe with some form of court martial, trial, something like that, but an execution which people can witness so that they can take away from this, that Henry is now dead, he's gone, I.
Andrew Boardman
Believe so as odd as it might seem and as sort of like American if you like, as it might seem, because you have witnesses when people go get executed in America, for instance, you have lots and lots of witnesses and you have judges and to see if it's done properly. Maybe that is exactly what happened as somebody was tasked to do it and was rewarded afterwards. Robert Radcliffe, who I've, I'm investigating at the moment, he got well rewarded for some unknown reason, not just with money but with land. He got lots and lots of land. He got captaincy of the governorship of Calais Garrison, he married into Edward's family, the Welles's family and it's just like, why is this guy getting all these? It's quite interesting because if I couldn't link him to the, to Henry VI then I would understand, but I can link him to Henry VI because he looked after him and so did William Sayer and a few others who looked after Henry VI in the Tower before his death. And Robert was the last man to look after him when the amount of people, the amount of servants that Henry VI had to bring him food to clean him, to look after him because he wasn't in a cell, whether that was him, whether he knew him, he knew who it was, whether Henry knew.
Matt Lewis
Robert and perhaps someone in Henry's mental and physical state, it would be less terrifying I guess, if someone you know well, who you're used to coming to your room all the time comes in, even if you're not aware that he's perhaps there to end your life on that occasion.
Andrew Boardman
But I do believe, I mean it needs to be a take home, that Richard actually organised it.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, yeah. So we've got kind of Edward gives the order, Richard is organizing it as constable, but potentially there is an executioner out there still to be found.
Andrew Boardman
Yes, there is, and I'm doing my best.
Matt Lewis
Well, when you find him, you'll have to come back and tell us because I'm keen to know who it was now. Well, thank you so much for joining us, Andrew. It's been fascinating to pick apart this moment that people quite often skip over in the wars of the Roses. We're, we will know Barnet in Tewkesbury and we will know that Edward gets his throne back. We perhaps miss this this critical few days in London that decide the fate potentially of Henry vi. Thank you so much for joining us.
Andrew Boardman
Thanks Mark. Great.
Matt Lewis
Hope you've enjoyed this episode. Andrew's book the Rose the Bastard and the Saint the Murder of Henry VI is out now if you'd like to understand this moment in more detail and you can find several episodes episodes on the wars of the Roses in our back catalog. If you'd like some context for this episode or a refresher on the wider wars of the Roses, there are new installments of Gone Medieval every Tuesday and Friday. So please come back to join Eleanor and I for more from the greatest millennium in human history. Don't forget to also subscribe or follow us on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts and tell all of your friends and family that you've gone medieval. You can sign up to History Hit to access hundreds of hours of original documentaries with a new release every week and all of History Hits podcasts ad free. Head to historyhit.com subscribe go on, you know you want to. Anyway, I better let you go. I've been Matt Lewis and we've just Gone medieval with history hit. Hey Tinsley, why don't we use ezkater to order food for staff lunches?
Kristen
Because my 46 page acronym system is so easy. I just have to salad, stay alert to late arriving deliveries, pie put in expenses and guga pie go out and get everyone's preferences and allergy information.
Matt Lewis
That's supposed to be simple.
Kristen
No, simple is Steven, Irma and Margie prefer lasagna and empanadas.
Matt Lewis
Omg.
Andrew Boardman
No need to make work life more complicated.
Kristen
Just use EasyCater the easy way to get food for work.
G
Grandes campios anjegado at Ben Franklin Transit aures mas vasil que nunga jegardon de necesitas mas rapido, mas inteligente y me cor conectado el servicio express Ja esta dispone I con las rutas dos equis y dos quarenta e quiz reduciendo el tiempo de viajarpur la ciudad e introduciendo servicio all ayo puerto tambien emos acualisado las brutas y los orarios paraquezia. Justin mejora tudia yasay aquajo a classes o Thomas umbuelo Ben Franklin Transit estaki parramantenerte enmovimiento obtain mas informacion en be effete punto oje diagonal service changes.
Gone Medieval: The Murder of Henry VI – Detailed Summary
Release Date: June 27, 2025
Introduction
In this gripping episode of Gone Medieval, hosted by Matt Lewis from History Hit, medieval military historian Andrew Boardman delves into the lesser-known yet pivotal events surrounding the murder of King Henry VI during the tumultuous Wars of the Roses. Boardman's recent book, The Rose, the Bastard, and the Saint: The Murder of Henry VI, serves as the foundation for an in-depth exploration of the siege of London in 1471 and its profound implications for medieval England.
Setting the Scene: England in 1471
Matt Lewis [02:17]: "The death of a medieval king is always a moment of crisis, upheaval, and, for some people, opportunity."
The episode begins by painting a vivid picture of England's political landscape in the spring of 1471. The kingdom is embroiled in the Wars of the Roses, a dynastic conflict between the House of Lancaster and the House of York. Following King Edward IV's temporary exile and the brief restoration of Henry VI, tensions flare once more as Edward regains the throne and seeks to consolidate his power.
Andrew Boardman [04:52]: "We're still in the Wars of the Roses. He's the first Yorkist king. He's been driven into exile by Warwick, his former friend."
The Readeption and Escalating Conflict
Boardman succinctly outlines the complexities of the Readeption period, a six-month resurgence of Lancastrian power under Henry VI facilitated by Richard Neville, the Earl of Warwick. This delicate balance is shattered when Edward IV returns from Burgundy, leading to a series of battles that set the stage for the siege of London.
Andrew Boardman [07:23]: "There was two Kings. So Henry VI... And then there's Warwick in the middle, scheming which way it will fall."
The Overlooked Siege of London
The crux of Boardman's discussion centers on the 1471 siege of London, a critical yet often neglected episode in the Wars of the Roses. Despite its significance, historical narratives have frequently skimmed over this event, focusing instead on major battles like Barnet and Tewkesbury.
Matt Lewis [07:56]: "This is one of the reasons that I got really, really interested in the book."
Boardman explains that the siege represents a convergence of political and military maneuvers that could have drastically altered the course of English history. The rebellion led by Thomas Neville, Lord Falkenberg—a bastard son of the influential Neville family—and Queen Margaret’s return with Lancastrian forces aimed to seize London and reinstate Henry VI.
Key Protagonists: Yorkists vs. Lancastrians
The episode introduces the main figures involved in the siege:
Thomas Neville, Lord Falkenberg: A formidable military leader and pirate, Falkenberg spearheaded the Lancastrian rebellion with aspirations to free Henry VI from the Tower of London.
Andrew Boardman [11:01]: "You've got Thomas Neville and then you've got other parts of the country leading the rebellion."
Lord Rivers (Anthony Woodville): A Yorkist noble left in London to defend the city against the rebels. Despite being older and less active militarily, Rivers played a crucial role in organizing London's defenses.
Matt Lewis [13:27]: "Lord Rivers is Anthony Woodville, who is Edward IV's queen's brother."
The Assault on London
Falkenberg's forces, estimated at around 10,000 strong, approached London with a dual strategy: an overt declaration of non-aggression and an underlying intent to incite Lancastrian support. Initial negotiations failed, leading to an aggressive assault on London Bridge and subsequent attempts to breach the city's defenses.
Andrew Boardman [22:11]: "He attacks London Bridge... He attacks the Great Stone Gate."
Despite penetrating London Bridge, Falkenberg's forces were repelled by London's well-prepared militias and defensive measures, including boiling oil and artillery from ships. The rebels then attempted a simultaneous assault on the eastern gates but faced stiff resistance, culminating in fierce street battles and widespread destruction.
Andrew Boardman [27:51]: "It's an epic siege which lasts two days. There's a lot of turning points."
Turning the Tide: Edward IV’s Return
As the siege raged, Edward IV swiftly mobilized his forces. Upon receiving news of the rebellion's developments, Edward dispatched his brother, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, to secure London. Gloucester's arrival marked a turning point, as Yorkist reinforcements swiftly dismantled the rebel forces, leading to Falkenberg's retreat and eventual capture.
Andrew Boardman [33:05]: "He gets chased right up to Stadney and leave London burning."
The Aftermath: Fate of Thomas Neville and Henry VI
Post-siege, Falkenberg was pardoned initially but soon reverted to rebellion, leading to his eventual execution by Gloucester. Simultaneously, the episode shifts focus to the mysterious death of Henry VI. Official Yorkist accounts claim Henry died of natural causes—such as a stroke or heart attack—indicating melancholy and frailty. However, Boardman posits that Henry's death was likely orchestrated, considering his symbolic value as a Lancastrian figurehead.
Matt Lewis [46:54]: "There's this official story that comes out of the Yorkist government that Henry dies of in air quotes. Pure melancholy."
Boardman explores the possibility of a deliberate assassination, suspecting Richard, Duke of Gloucester, as the orchestrator, though the exact details remain elusive. This act would have been a strategic move to eliminate a rallying point for Lancastrian dissent and solidify Yorkist control.
Andrew Boardman [54:02]: "I do believe these others are real. Real. But somebody must have killed him."
Implications for the Wars of the Roses
The culmination of the siege and Henry VI's death had profound implications:
Consolidation of Yorkist Power: With Henry VI removed, Edward IV faced fewer threats to his reign, reducing the likelihood of immediate rebellions and stabilizing his position.
End of the Lancastrian Line: Henry VI’s death marked a significant decline in Lancastrian influence, diminishing any prospects for a resurgence unless new claimants emerged.
Historical Narrative and Propaganda: The event underscores the use of propaganda by the Yorkists to legitimize their rule and delegitimize their rivals, shaping historical interpretations for generations.
Matt Lewis [50:11]: "If you kill Henry, what you're doing is renewing the Lancastrian cause in this young prince who is not in Edward's custody at this point."
Conclusion
This episode of Gone Medieval meticulously unravels a critical yet overshadowed chapter in the Wars of the Roses, highlighting how the siege of London and the subsequent murder of Henry VI were instrumental in shaping England's medieval landscape. Andrew Boardman's analysis offers fresh insights into the political machinations and personal vendettas that characterized this period, enriching our understanding of the complexities behind historical events.
Matt Lewis [57:14]: "Thank you so much for joining us, Andrew. It's been fascinating to pick apart this moment that people quite often skip over in the Wars of the Roses."
For those intrigued by this deep dive into medieval intrigue and power struggles, Andrew Boardman's book provides a comprehensive exploration of these events.
Notable Quotes:
Matt Lewis [02:17]: "The death of a medieval king is always a moment of crisis, upheaval, and, for some people, opportunity."
Andrew Boardman [09:42]: "I wanted to look into it deeply and see if I could find out what actually happened... who killed him."
Andrew Boardman [54:27]: "Yes, Gloucester's in the middle, as he usually is. He was tasked with executing Falkenberg... so he does away with Falkenberg."
Matt Lewis [51:34]: "It's hard not to feel sorry for him at this point in his own story."
Further Engagement
Listeners are encouraged to explore Andrew Boardman's book, The Rose, the Bastard, and the Saint: The Murder of Henry VI, for a more detailed account of these events. Additionally, episodes on the broader Wars of the Roses are available in the Gone Medieval back catalog, providing comprehensive context and analysis of this defining period in European history.
Subscribe and Support
To continue enjoying Gone Medieval ad-free and gain access to bonus episodes and original documentaries, sign up for a History Hit subscription here. Stay updated with new releases every week and immerse yourself in hundreds of hours of historical content.