
Dr. Eleanor Janega and Matt Lewis demystify the terminology used to define different historical periods
Loading summary
Matt Lewis
Hello, I'm Matt Lewis.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
And I'm Dr. Eleanor Jaenega and we're.
Matt Lewis
Just popping up here to tell you some insider info.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
If you would like to listen to Gone Medieval ad free and get early access and bonus episodes, sign up to.
Matt Lewis
History Hit with the History Hit subscription, you can also watch hundreds of hours of original documentaries such as my new.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Series on everyone's favorite conquerors, the Normans.
Matt Lewis
Or my recent exploration of the castles that made Britain.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
There's a new release to enjoy every week.
Matt Lewis
Sign up now by visiting historyhit.com subscribe or find the link in the show notes for this episode.
Dan Snow
Enjoy a brilliant sleep experience with Soundcore from anchor Stressed out by your partner's snoring? Having trouble falling asleep? Waking up too easily? Suffering from poor quality sleep? Now put on Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds. Experience unparalleled pressure free comfort perfect for side sleepers. Choose your favorite sound in your curated playlist, feel your body getting lighter and lighter and enjoy a full night of peaceful sleep with the A20's long lasting battery. Then wake up feeling fresh with a personal built in alarm. Get the sleep you deserve with Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds. Discover more on soundcore.com S O U N D C O R E Soundcore Use code sleep at Checkout to get $30 off S L E E P in all caps.
Matt Lewis
Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, but.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Some opinions are more useful than others.
Matt Lewis
And we all want the good ones.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
The ones that shake things up, spark.
Matt Lewis
Debates and change minds.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Financial Times readers know that their opinions.
Matt Lewis
Are reliable because they're shaped by trusted journalism, robust opinions, confident decisions. Source FT to subscribe go to ft.comSourceFT.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Acast powers the world's best podcasts. Here's a show that we recommend. Hey everybody, I'm Jen. I'm Jess and we're Fat Mascara, the only beauty podcast you need in your life. We're beauty editors by day and podcasters by night, and we've got all the industry gossip for you, like insider product.
Dan Snow
Reviews and advice you're not going to find online.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
And the best part is interviews with the most sought after experts in the beauty biz, Charlotte Tilbury, Jen Atkins, and makeup artist Sir John. That's just a taste of what you're going to get on the Fat Mascara podcast, so come hang with us. New episodes drop every Tuesday and Thursday.
Dan Snow
Acast helps creators launch, grow and monetize their podcasts everywhere.
Matt Lewis
Acast.com foreign.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Hello, I'm Dr. Eleanor Jaunega and Welcome to Gone Medieval From History Hit, the podcast that delves into the greatest millennium in human history. We uncover the greatest mysteries, the gobsmacking details, and the latest groundbreaking research. From the Vikings to the Normans, from kings to popes to the Crusades, we delve into the rebellions, plots and murders that tell us who we really were and how we got here. Pop quiz. How do you define the Middle Ages? I mean, yeah, it's the time period that we cover on this show, but when I say something is medieval, what exactly does that mean? Because it does have a meaning, I assure you. And beyond that, if I told you that something happened during the early medieval period, would you necessarily know what I meant? Both of these terms and the way that we came up with them are a part of what we historians refer to as periodization. That's when we try to come up with terms to distinguish different time periods, in theory, to make it easier to talk and write about them. But the thing about being a historian is that you can sometimes forget that you're throwing out technical terms left, right and center without necessarily knowing if you've brought your audience with you. I'm Dr. Eleanor Jaoniga, and today on Gone Medieval From History Hit, I've managed to negotiate my fabulous co host, Matt Lewis release from the Gone medieval dungeon so that we can chat about what makes something medieval. More than that, we're also going to talk about what makes something early medieval. And we'll explain to you why you should never ever describe something as the Dark Ages unless you are specifically trying to make me very angry indeed. Matt, my love, thank you so much for coming over on a Tuesday.
Dan Snow
Thank you.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
And having a conversation about one of the more you might say, nerdy aspects of medieval history. But actually this is bedrock stuff, isn't it?
Matt Lewis
Absolutely. I mean, I enjoy any excuse to get out of the Gone medieval dungeon on a. Not a Friday. So coming over here on Tuesday and coming over here to talk about nerdy stuff, I'm definitely here for that.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Okay, so when we say nerdy stuff, right, there's this big term that historians use, which is periodization. And periodization sounds a little more daunting than it actually is. I mean, what it is is a super handy term that historians use to say, look, guys, we've got an era, it's a period, right? And obviously that's something that we use for the medieval period because it's not like the Middle Ages are an actual fact written in stone. It's something that historians created.
Matt Lewis
And I think periodization is one of those things that is instantly difficult as soon as you do it, because we will talk about the medieval period in what is a very Western Europe centric way. It takes zero account of China, Japan, Africa, the Americas. It has no resemblance to what is happening there. It's a handy label to put on stuff from where we're sitting, looking outwards. So it's instantly problematic because a Japanese person will not recognize the early medieval period as a thing. It means nothing. But the difficulty is, if you don't do that somewhere and put those lines in the sand somewhere, then history is just one massive blob that becomes utterly indecipherable. So it's a way of tackling it. It's instantly imperfect, but kind of what is the option?
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Exactly? You know, and this is the difficulty with the humanities in general is that we are doing our best to parse all of human history. And so we come up with technical ways of attempting to account for this. But, you know, a lovely way I've heard this put is that it's sort of like you're putting a bucket into the ocean and you can look into that bucket and you can see what you can see in there and make generalities about the ocean as a whole. But that doesn't mean that that is what's going on in all of the ocean all of the time. Right? And that's kind of what periodization helps us do. And it helps us particularly talk to each other as historians and hopefully then explain what our problem is to ordinary people as well. Because if we don't have terms, if we don't have ways of catching things, then, as you say, it's just this blob. Right.
Matt Lewis
I think it's a bit like watching Star wars, isn't it? You know, the original Star wars trilogy, episodes one, two and three, if that was just six odd hours of cinema, it would mean nothing. Someone has made a decision to split that into three different stories that have a beginning, a middle and an end. And something happens. There is some evolution within those stories. And then someone has decided, right, I'm going to end a new hope here. And then we're going to start the Empire Strikes Back. That's all that historians are doing. You could have edited those films differently. Those beginning and endings could have been in a different place. The focus could have been different. Someone has to make a choice to make it digestible.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
I love this, and I'm immediately stealing it as explaining the ultimate evil period and periodization. Because also, you know, one of the Things that happens with Star wars is when you see the first Star wars film, there's also contextualization at the beginning of a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. And it hints at all these things that have happened that you don't get to see confusingly until the 90s when the new ones come out. Right? And that's sort of what happens with the Middle Ages as well. Because when we say Middle Ages, I think everyone is just so used to hearing this as a term, Medieval Middle Ages. But they don't necessarily sit down and think about the brass tacks of what that means. And for us historians, it makes perfect sense because we're saying, oh, it's in the middle of something. And it's like, well, what are those middle things? It's ancient history, which, to be honest, is most of it, right? Thousands upon thousands of years is ancient history. And it is European centric, right? Because we say, okay, and then the Middle Ages starts after the fall, I'm saying in air quotes of Rome in 476. And then there's the Middle Ages and then there's the modern era. Modern era, that's kind of a tricky one because when do things become modern? That is really up in the air for anyone to kind of debate. But for our purposes, like the new Star Wars, I guess, are Rome. Right? So, you know, like Episode one and all that, that's your Rome. And then you've got Star Wars, Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi.
Matt Lewis
Everyone knows Empire in the middle is the best film.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
I mean, that is true. Yeah.
Matt Lewis
The middle bit is always the best bit.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
It's true. Oh, my gosh. You know what? All my friends who are 12th century historians are all like cheering right now. You've just fed right into their hands, Matt.
Matt Lewis
I aim to please. So I read Dan Jones's Power and Thrones and he talks in the beginning of that about this idea of the Middle Ages coming out of John Fox writing his history and thinking about there's everything that happened ages and ages ago up to when Christ was alive. And that's a set of history. And when Christ is alive, obviously everything was great at the early church, absolutely fine. And then he wants to talk because he's a Protestant in the, you know, the mid 16th century he wants to talk about now is much better. Everything is getting better. So the modern era, we have Protestantism. So then the Middle Ages instantly becomes this pejorative term for everything in between what was good and what is good. It's kind of the midden heap in the middle where you can just sling all of the rubbish. The superstition of the Catholic Church, the rise of the Pope, all of the things that Protestants didn't like and were, were rebelling against. So almost in its creation, the idea of this Middle age, which is neither antique nor modern, is immediately pejorative, immediately puts down that entire era and then you move to get forward to the Age of enlightenment. You've got 16th and 17th century philosophers kind of latching onto this and saying, well, now, now we're in the age of thinking about things. Not like the medieval period where they had faith, they were superstitious and they just believed stuff. We're much more enlightened than that. And we want to connect with the ancient Greek and Roman philosophers who knew kind of the same stuff that we knew that they all forgot in the Middle Ages, that pit in the Middle. So they're trying to reach across that era to reconnect with what they think was better. And in all of these situations, Middle Ages becomes the dumping ground for everything that was bad. Because again, through the Age of Enlightenment, it's the age of faith, it's the age of the Church, it's the age of the power of Catholicism and all of that kind of thing that they are pushing against too. And that hasn't changed the amount of people you will see describe something today as medieval when they mean bad, violent, thoughtless. There are politicians today who talk about medieval attitudes to things. And it's because we still have this idea in our heads that it's a pejorative term, it's a rubbish era in which nothing good happened.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Absolutely. And it is political. Like, as you say, there's the enlightened political era philosophers who really push for this. And then there's also a really big commercial campaign to sell some Italian art in the early medieval period. So we kind of take this for granted now. But, you know, when we look at churches from the high to late medieval period and we describe them as Gothic, that was a very specific pejorative term invented by Italians to try to differentiate between medieval buildings, which they saw as being Germanic, hence Gothic. Right. And things for them, this was part and parcel with the symptomatic problems of the Middle Ages, where they're like, well, why are these Germans getting to control the Holy Roman Empire when everyone knows it should be Italians and everybody knows Italian things are good. So even if you were going to talk about outrageously cool things like Gothic architecture, there's this attempt to make that seem bad. And anytime you see that it is political. Anytime you see that someone's trying to tell you something, like whether it's selling you the concept of Protestantism or sell you a statue by Michael M. Angelo, there is some thought going into that which is trying to rubbish about a thousand years of history, and it's ridiculous. You know, anyone who knows anything about the medieval period or takes the time to look at it, you know, the idea that they didn't have Plato or Aristotle, all they have is Plato and Aristotle. I'm constantly reading what medieval people think about Aristotle. It never ends. But if you just don't bother to look at it because it's rubbish and it's bad and you don't need to, then it lets you just kind of off the hook, you know, you don't have to improve your Latin. That's great, you know, you don't have to get into a real sticky mess of contradictory, interesting people and you can just say, ah, don't need it. And it then makes you also feel very smart as a modern person, because you're not like that.
Matt Lewis
I guess it's always attractive to look down when we look back, isn't it? To think things were worse back then and to measure everything by our own ideas of progress. Because I think there are measures by which you can paint the millennium of the medieval period as a time when there wasn't huge technological progress. The printing press comes along and revolutionizes stuff. We're in the age of computer and information and everything now. It's hard to see those big seismic shifts, but that doesn't mean that everything stayed the same. And it doesn't mean that people weren't developing and having ideas and creating things. You know, clocks are a medieval invention. The church clock.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Yeah. I mean, how about this? The three field system, which no one thinks is particularly sexy, but it revolutionizes farming, which means that people have way, way more food to eat, which means you can sustain a higher population, which means that more people can move into cities and they can make art. And all of this comes from just figuring out that that field needs a break really quickly. And that's a piece of tech, you know?
Matt Lewis
Yeah, yeah. And looking back today, we would say the world is a very different place from what it was 50 years ago, 100 years ago, unrecognisable from 200 years ago. I imagine people in the 15th century were sitting there thinking almost exactly the same. How did people possibly live 200 years ago? Things must have been so much worse than they are. We've moved on so Far things have changed so much. You know, the pace of change is definitely speeding up more recently. But that's not to say that people at the end of the medieval period lived exactly the same way as the people at the beginning and thought the same things that they had thought a thousand years earlier.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Oh, and absolutely, we see that all the time as historians. Literally, you will just kind of see it in the way that they write. You know, scripts change completely over this thousand years. So a document that you find from 570 is going to look completely different from one, say in 1485. You're going to have to know a completely different way of writing in order to read these things. Certainly we see sizes of cities change, we see the places where people live change. You know, the Romans couldn't figure out how to farm extensively in Germany because the soil was too heavy. Medieval people figure that out and suddenly you've got a lot more people living in places where they simply did not in the ancient period. You know, you have population change, demographic change, and also changes in ideas. So what we see in terms of philosophy can be completely different as well. So there's all sorts of very, very interesting intellectual changes. And as a result of this, historians, we break the medieval period down further, right. So you've got the medieval period, which goes from 476 to, you know, if you've seen Protestants, you've gone too far. Right. So I mean, an easy way of doing it is saying, I don't know, the 16th century, the 1500s, I guess that's the end. But we don't have a real clear division on that. And that's a long time. Like over a thousand years of history is a very long time. So we then break that down into three other chunks and these are terms that you might here thrown around as well. So you've got the early Medieval period, which is kind of the 5th to the 10th century. You've got the high Medieval period, which is about a thousand to 1300, and the late medieval period, which is about 1300 to, I mean, I guess the 1500s. And then that helps us more particularly. It's the same thing as the problems with the Middle Ages. Is this perfect? No, it isn't. Right. There are big changes and holdovers in all of those things. But I'll tell you what, the way that people are living in 1350 is way, way different from the way they are living in 750. That's certainly the case.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, absolutely. If we focus on the early medieval period and we can definitely Come back to the other ones in a future podcast and hopefully dig into those a little bit more. But if we think about the early medieval period, I guess the big question is, when do we start it? What kicks off the early medieval period? When did everyone wake up in the morning and go tear off the calendar and say, yes, we're early medieval now?
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Yeah, and they were so hyped. I mean, what we say is the early medieval period begins in 476 with the so called fall of the Roman Empire. And this is one of those things where, you know, no one at the time would have told you that that had happened. This is again one of those things that looking back, we say, ah, there it is, Rome has fallen. And what we have pinned that to is the deposition of the last Western Roman emperor, Romulus Augustulus, by Odoacer, who is a Goth. But this kind of belies, I mean, that would be a really simple way of looking at things. You know, oh, a barbarian quote unquote comes in and he topples the emperor. But this belies a really much more complex situation. The Western Roman Emperor didn't really have very much power at all at this point. Everything was going on over in Constantinople. The Western Roman emperors had for some time largely just been puppets of eastern Rome. They'd say, yeah, I like this guy, he's not going to cause too much trouble. We're going to put him in. Most of the so called barbarians were highly Roman. You know, they'd been working in the Roman Empire, they had been generals in the Roman army. They didn't want to take over Rome in order to collapse it. They wanted to take over Rome in order to control it. They were like, yeah, baby, I want those sweet, sweet tax credits, you know, so this makes it seem like there was some big rupture that changes things irreparably. But at the time, that's just not how it goes down.
Matt Lewis
No, because I mean, you can talk about 476 as that moment when the last Western Roman emperors deposed, but you could be talking about the sack of Rome a bit earlier or the other sack of Rome a bit even earlier. To contemporaries, it would have been a gradual process of the decline in the power and authority and a apparent indestructibility of the Roman Empire. But it wouldn't have been the flick of a switch. And as you're saying, contemporaries would have frowned at us probably and thought, but the Roman Empire's still there, it's in Constantinople, it's lost a bit of it in Rome. You Know, it might have lost its birthplace, but the empire still exists. So why are you saying the Roman Empire is over it? There's no big change there in Constantinople. We are Rome, we are the Roman Empire.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Oh, absolutely.
Matt Lewis
And then you even get the return of an emperor in the west with Charlemagne in the year 800. So you've only actually got a couple of centuries without a Western emperor. So it's not just the fact that the Western Roman Empire doesn't have an emperor anymore, a leader anymore, it's kind of from a long way further forward, looking back and seeing that as a moment of significant cultural rupture that had a big long buildup and a big long tail. But we're just going to hang things on 476.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
It's one of these things where, I don't know, it's kind of Victorian, isn't it, to say, oh yeah, you can definitively do this, you can say that there is a date where these things happen. But we all know that's not how culture shakes out. And I mean, indeed culturally at the time. If you say, oh, the fall of Rome, they weren't even living in Rome at the time. You know, the emperors were living in Ravenna at this point. So everybody's idea of there being like a Grand Colosseum and, you know, all of these things happening, that's not how Rome was acting at the time. And indeed, like, this idea of Roman ness never goes away in the medieval period. And we see instead a series of kingdoms crop up that medievalists refer to as the Roman successor states. And this is a really, really big deal because what ends up happening is a lot of the Germanic peoples, you know, the Goths, come in and they take over areas that had been Roman. And one of these very big famous ones is the Ostrogothic King Theodoric, and he reigns as the regent of the Visigoths. And he kind of comes into power about 493. And he has this wonderful quote about it, which he says, a poor Roman plays the Goth and a rich Goth the Roman, which is incredibly excellent, right, for him. The thing is, the minute you get money, if you are Gothic, you say, look at me, I'm Roman, I've got a toga. You know, like I'm, I'm speaking Latin and I'm doing all of these things. But Romans themselves, they kind of liked this new influx of culture. They were like, oh, look, I've got a mustache, I'm doing some new things. You know, this is a new and interesting way of Looking at the world and relating to it. So there are all these big kind of cultural trade offs. And indeed, Theodoric never calls himself the emperor, but as the region of the Visigoths, he eventually controls a bunch of land that stretches from the Atlantic to the Adriatic. That's not nothing, certainly. And he is smart enough that he employs all of these people who had formerly been working with Rome and who were Romans. So very famously, he's got a secretary called Cassiodorus who is one of his big advisors. And we have absolutely oodles of his communication with other leaders. We see them taking pains to emphasize how this is just a new way of doing Rome and we're just kind of responding to the pressures of the time. No one there would say, oh, this is a totally new thing. It just doesn't work that way.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, I think we always have to think that people living day to day are. If they're seeing anything, they're seeing the evolution, not the revolution. In a lot of these moments, you know, we seem to have this idea that, you know, we'll hang it on 476. So on the 17th of January, 476, everyone went to bed in a toga and got up in jerkins and hose and whatever else and we're like, oh, we've changed. I mean, it just doesn't happen, does it? There is still this effort to be the new Rome and that continues for the rest of the medieval, well beyond the medieval period. The Holy Roman Empire will exist for centuries beyond the end of the medieval period. So there is always that notion, that idea, that desire to get back to Rome all through the medieval period and beyond. So there isn't quite that rupture that people like to see. I guess I want to drop the D word now. So I'm going to give people a minute to wonder, oh, he's going to do it.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
He's doing it.
Matt Lewis
Give people a moment to see if they know what the D word is in gone medieval terms. And I was wondering whether you might have worn your shorts for this. But for anyone who doesn't know, just Google Elena Jarnegger and the Dark Ages. So we get this kind of pejorative term for this period within a period that has a pejorative term. So this is like pejorative squared. When we get to the Dark Ages, why do we talk about that and why shouldn't we?
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Okay, so Dark Ages as a term is a really, really misunderstood one because for a while historians were using it and as the shorts say, Matt, for Us, the term Dark Ages refers to a lack of sources, not intellectual decline. And we get that term from a modern era. Cardinal and church historian Caesar Baronius, and he coined this term saeculum obscurum. But hilariously, he was referring to the 10th and 11th centuries because it's like we just don't have as many sour as we had had under the Carolingians, like in the 9th century. And that's kind of weird. So he wasn't talking about, oh, there's a period of scientific malaise or this is particularly politically bad. This is a really difficult time. What he's saying is we get to this sort of tipping point and we just didn't keep as many texts from them. Right. Because something that I will get thrown back at me when I say Dark Ages doesn't mean bad times. It means we don't have any sources. People will say, aha, well, then why are there no sources? As though this is some kind of gotcha. And I have heard it said specifically, either because people didn't know how to write anymore, question mark, or a big one. The church quote was burning books, which is just like. Well, neither of those things are true. And what it comes down to, you know, and when we use the term Dark Ages, we've now gone a bit past what Caesar Bronius meant and we tend to mean early Middle Ages. And I don't know if you've heard this, Matt, but the 5th century is a really long time ago. I know. And it's just really difficult to keep things around. There are fires constantly in the ancient and medieval world. You know, you've got everything lit up by fire and things burn down. Libraries, houses, church buildings, these things just burn. So that's really, really difficult. Another thing that's difficult is when you look at these guys, as you say, they've got so much reverence for Rome. So if you're having like a big clean out of stuff, the things you get rid of are your own things. Because you're like, eh, who cares about, you know, my Bible from 20 years ago, what I want to keep is its Aristotle tract. And so the things that get passed down are these things that are older because they're seen as more important. They don't have the same way of thinking about the historical record as usual. So eventually, over hundreds upon hundreds of years, even a millennia or so, you just lose stuff. And it makes it more difficult to see what is going on there. But then, unfortunately, the enlightenment happens.
Matt Lewis
Unfortunately, people become enlightened.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
We don't want that and at this point in time. Oh, God. We'll tell you who wasn't enlightened, and I will wrestle him. Is Voltaire. Right. And he's really, really responsible for perpetuating this idea that the Middle Ages is bad. And what he says is, the Middle Ages is the era of faith. And now in the modern period, we are in the age of reason. So anytime that anyone was religious, things were bad. And now that's kind of hilarious, because I'm like, I'm sorry, you're saying that the Romans were not religious, the guys who asked their magic chickens before they went out to battle whether or not that wasn't religion? No, no. Okay, just checking. I'm just checking in on that one. Right. But what he kind of means is that people were Christian more particularly. And so this is kind of positing this dichotomy wherein medieval people are particularly bad at this point in time. But again, that doesn't even really track with the early medieval experience, because a lot of Europeans aren't Christian yet. So, like, explain why you're mad at them. I don't understand.
Matt Lewis
We obviously need to concede that when the Roman Empire largely collapses, particularly in the west, you lose that huge administration machine that is producing documents, is writing things down, is quantifying stuff across the empire in order to be able to rule it. So we lose some of that. You also have to say that the success of the Vikings in a culture that doesn't really write things down, they use runes, and they will occasionally write odd things, but they don't write chronicles in the way that we would like to see them written. You get later sagas and all of that sort of stuff, but they're not cataloging the administrative machine of the ways the Vikings are working. And as they expand to the east and the south and the west and everywhere else, think of the things they could have told us, but they just writing it down wasn't culturally important to them. And that doesn't mean that they're wrong. It means it's annoying for us because we don't have that stuff. It would have been great if they'd bothered to write it down. All that time on the boats, you'd have thought someone could have kept a little travelogue. So we are missing lots of the sources that we might see in the Roman period and that grow throughout the medieval period. The monk chroniclers and then the citizen chroniclers and all of those kinds of things that come later. But even allowing for stuff like that, thinking of it as the dark ages can be misleading. By the end of the seventh century and into the eighth century, you've got Bede sat there writing absolute masterpieces that 1200 years later are still important pieces of work that survive to us today. And as you say, that's despite the fact that so much material has been lost through fire or destruction or theft or whatever else causes you to lose an ancient manuscript. And you put against that the quality of the jewelry that are found in Anglo Saxon graveyards and stuff like that. You know, it's absolutely astonishing. How you can say this is in any way a cultural or intellectual backward age dark age is beyond me. It just doesn't stack up to the evidence. And I think the archaeology is coming in to sort of compensate for the lack of the written sour in some places as well.
Dan Snow
Enjoy a brilliant sleep experience with Soundcore from Anchor Stressed out by your partner's snoring? Having trouble falling asleep? Waking up too easily? Suffering from poor quality sleep? Now put on Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds. Experience unparalleled pressure free comfort perfect for side sleepers. Choose your favorite sound in your curated playlist. Feel your body getting lighter and lighter and enjoy a full night of peaceful sleep with the A20's long lasting battery. Then wake up feeling fresh with a personal built in alarm. Get the sleep you deserve with Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds. Discover more on soundcore.com S O U N D C O R E Soundcore Use code sleep at Checkout to get $30 off S L E E P in all caps. Taxes was taxing. Now taxes is relaxing when you file for free I can file for free.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
TurboTax Free Edition Roughly 37% of filers qualify.
Dan Snow
Simple Form 1040 returns only. See if you qualify@turbotax.com free I can file for free now.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
This is Taxes.
Matt Lewis
File for free with TurboTax Free Edition.
Dan Snow
And get your maximum refund. No schedules except for earned income tax credit, child tax credit, and student loan interest.
Matt Lewis
See if you qualify@turbotax.com free so we've arrived in winter. We're getting up in the dark. The commutes are stuffy. The person next to you is coughing. I've got just the thing for you. An excellent escape. I'm Dan Snow, host of the Dan Snow's History Hit Podcast, where I whisk you away into the greatest stories in history. Join me on the Inca Trail in Peru where I'll tell you the story of Machu Picchu. Or travel with me to the mighty Colosseum in Rome to find out just what the gladiatorial games were really like, follow Thomas Cochrane, the real master and commander, across the high seas. I take you round the world to where history happened. So check out Dan Snow's history hit for the best historical escapism this winter, wherever you get your podcasts.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
As historians, the thing that we work with is texts, right? To be a historian is to say, oh, I don't know, what were people writing? I'm going to analyze these things. To me, an archaeologist is to go find the cool stuff that's buried and then analyze that. And we use each other's work and we're cribbing off each other's notes and we're attacking, attempting to create a context that explains the past. But just because a culture doesn't write things down doesn't mean they're stupid. And that's an incredibly important point. You can have societies that do incredible stuff just through oral transmission, and that is completely valid. And it doesn't mean that anyone is more stupid. It just means that things are being done in a different way. And it is really easy for us as a society that privileges literacy and uses literacy for very many things. And, hey, I love being literate. I think it's great. Really huge fan of it. But do I think that makes me somehow smarter than the average person in the 8th century? No, I do not. And indeed, we do see people, especially in the early Middle Ages, eventually really begin to privilege that again, right? Because you have all these incredible things happening, like the Carolingian Renaissance, which happens under Charlemagne, wherein everyone gets together and they're like, find as many bits of ancient texts as you can get and make as many copies as you can. And also, this is the way that we're going to write. They come up with a new script called Carolingian Miniscule that makes it really clear and easy to read everything. And suddenly you've got more Plato circulating, you've got more Aristotle circulating. So much so that during the Renaissance, when people went back in time and they said, I want to find the most pristine copy of Aristotle possible, and I want to write like those people did. They're actually going back to 8th century and 9th century documents that were created under Charlemagne, and they make this new script called Humanist, which is just Carolyn Jean miniscule again, right? Because it was actually things done during the medieval period, the early medieval period, that allow us to know more about the past. So these are people who get it, and they're doing their best in circumstances that are Kind of trying, you know, I'm sure that I wouldn't have the time to think on the level that they did if I was still having, like, to do all of my own crops, you know, like, come on. It's incredible stuff that they get done.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, put that in your pipe and smoke it. Voltaire. And I think, again, you can stack against it. Stuff like, you know, we did a really interesting episode on the podcast a while ago on Justinian, Byzantine Emperor. So we have been quite Western European focused. You move a little bit further east, you've got the Byzantine Empire absolutely thriving in cultural terms, full of architecture and art that is beyond anything we build today. And you look at Justinian, who puts together this kind of law code that becomes a template for all of Europe almost ever since. So he's around in the mid 6th century and he writes a law code that spreads across Europe and is the basis for lots of the law codes across Europe still. You know, Napoleon will look at Justinian's law code and go, whoop, I'll have some of that. It's hugely influential. These aren't people who aren't thinking. These are people who were thinking things 1500 years ago that we haven't bettered today.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Well, absolutely not. I mean, I think Justinian is really important to bring up here, and Constantinople is really important to bring up because, you know, we said it in a sort of throwaway manner. Rome didn't collapse because Constantinople was still there. And I would challenge anyone to get in a time machine and go to Constantinople in the 6th century and tell me Rome had fallen. And I think a really great example of this is actually a kind of violent one, which is the nika riots in 532, where in several chariot teams, because there's four major chariot teams that everybody loves and follows in Constantinople. Basically, some members of the Greens and the Blues, the two largest factions, get in trouble for something and they're meant to be hanged, and then they escape. It's all very convoluted, right? There are huge riots as a result of this because everybody wants their boys to survive. And the resulting riots go on for days. Justinian and Theodora are almost captured by rioters. Theodora stands her ground and chides all of the nobles for, you know, wanting to make a break for it. But in the ashes of this, something like 10,000 people are dead and huge parts of Constantinople are burnt down. And so why do I bring this up as an example for why this is Rome? And you're like, eleanor, that's quite Violent and doesn't sound great. My point is you've got 10,000 people around the shop that you can kill. Like in this city. You have so many people who are fans of chariot racing that they are ready to just go to war over it. Tell me this isn't Roman. You've got a huge urban center, you've got people going to the chariot races. That's Rome, baby. I don't know what to tell you.
Matt Lewis
And then alongside that cultural thriving still happening in Eastern Europe, you move slightly further east. And during this period you've got the rise of Islam, which will lead to huge scientific, philosophical, medical advances and the spread of information in a way that wasn't happening in Christian Europe too. So there is a huge flourishing there that Europe will come to see as a threat. But if you're not a European Christian, what's going on in the near east is incredibly exciting and vibrant and colorful and a new thinking is happening right there. You know, they are going back to lots of Greek texts and all of that kind of thing, but they are propagating it in a way that isn't happening anywhere else. And again, you see that cultural thriving that will spread across North Africa, make its way up into the Iberian Peninsula, create Al Andalus, where you can still go and see lots of Arabic influenced architecture today. And lots of the information that comes into Europe later on will come from those worlds where they've been doing this stuff for a few hundred years. Just the Christians in Europe weren't particularly interested in it.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Absolutely. You know, when we eventually get more of the classical texts back in Europe, they're often translated out of Arabic and then into Latin, often in Spain, what we would now call Spain. And that is such an interesting period, you know, the rise of Islam and this expansion first under Muhammad, then you get the Rashidun Caliphate, which kind of expands things into Egypt and Libya and Persia, Then you get the Umayyad Caliphate and they got over into Algeria and Morocco and Hispania and into Pakistan. Right. So it's this huge cultural and religious movement. And I think that it is so interesting to think about Al Andalus and how things go down on the Iberian Peninsula, because what had been happening on the Iberian Peninsula previously we actually know a lot about, because the Visigoths were over in Spain and they had created a nice little successor state to Rome that was so centralized and so well administrated that when you get the expansion of Islam, you can topple it because it's got a central government and you can just Kind of come in and knock it over. And then, hey, Spain is yours. Right? Because there was a flourishing state there that was just like, oh, well, we'll take all of the best of Rome, thank you very much, but we are doing Christian things. And, oh, where we do happen to be Visigothic, but we usually kind of speak the Spanish form of Latin, and that's what's going on over here. And the Umayyads just kind of come in and topple that over, and then you get this new thing again. So you see all of these bright and interesting cultures that are coexisting not necessarily peacefully, but that are certainly thriving at this time.
Matt Lewis
And that's ignoring the fact that we could then spread further into the world of, you know, China is one of the most significant powers in the world during this period, but would not recognize the notion of an early medieval period. There is stuff going on in Japan where they've had emperors for centuries, we'll have emperors for centuries more. There's a bit of fracturing around society and all of that sort of stuff, but they wouldn't define it in the way that we do into a medieval period. And then subdivide that the early medieval period bears no relation to their histories.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Absolutely none at all. And you tend to find that when we are looking at Japan or we are looking at China and any of these incredible cultures that, again, highly literate, so we have got sources for days over there. What we tend to see is that people separate them into dynasties. And you just talk about, you know, the Tang Dynasty happening. You don't say, oh, it's the early medieval period. And for us, we kind of have to do that with Europe because so many different things are happening in so many different places. So we can't just say, oh, hey, guys, remember that one family that was ruling because it isn't one contiguous imperial whole? That doesn't make it worse, it just makes it different. You know, it's absolutely fine to be English or Bavarian. Right. It doesn't matter if it isn't under exactly the same hierarchy. But I suppose what starts happening in Europe is a kind of continued expansion of Christianity, which makes us talk about it as a cultural whole. Because one of the things that's happening here is the increasing Christianization of the European continent.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, I was thinking a bit about. Is early medieval a useful term? We all use it? Is it actually useful? Does it mean anything? Can we pack anything significant into that? And I think I came up with kind of two things. So there is the not quite the completion of Christianization because we'll still have lots of pagans up in the Baltics and all of that kind of thing. But you've got Denmark becomes Christian in the 10th century. That is a significant shift. Iceland and Greenland will follow, and even Hungary around the millennium are becoming Christianized. Norway follows shortly after in the 11th century. So you have got that kind of watershed moment where Christianity is reaching the parts it's never previously been able to reach. And alongside that, I think there is this period in the aftermath of the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, of the fracturing of states into lots and lots of smaller things that then begin to come back together into larger states. So Charlemagne will create an empire, but then that will fracture again and somehow we'll end up with, you know, what is now France and Germany and England. And I think all of those states are then quite keen to create their own mythology about the inevitability that they should exist. They were always going to exist. And they lean into the kind of the badness of division into smaller states because they want to reinforce the idea that if we think about England, because I would. But once England becomes England, there is a couple of times when it looks like it's fracturing back into something like the heptarchy again and you get this frantic effort at the center to say that's really, really bad. You need to stay as one. And there is no real reason, there's no proof that's bad. What it means is I don't want to give up my control of this whole area. So I'm going to tell you that what happened then was terrible. All of these fighting warlords and now you've just got one great benevolent king who is looking after all of you. Why would you want to look backwards? And I think you get some of that in the Frankish kingdoms as well. You know, they're keen to talk about their own inevitability and this idea that they should exist props them up a little bit.
Dan Snow
Enjoy a brilliant sleep experience with Soundcore from Anchor. Stressed out by your partner's snoring. Having trouble falling asleep? Waking up too easily. Suffering from poor quality sleep. Now put on Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds experience unparalleled pressure free comfort perfect for side sleepers. Choose your favorite sound in your curated playlist. Feel your body getting lighter and lighter and enjoy a full night of peaceful sleep with the A20's long lasting battery. Then wake up feeling fresh with a personal built in alarm. Get the sleep you deserve with Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds buds Discover more on soundcore.com S O U N D C O R E soundcore Use code sleep at Checkout to get $30 off S L E E P in all caps.
Matt Lewis
I think we can drop into that early medieval period this idea that everything was fracturing and coming back together. And by the time we get to the end of the early medieval period, we've probably got a map of Europe at least that looks recognizable today.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Yeah, absolutely, because you begin to have constituent parts that crop up. So for example, you get the formation of the Holy Roman Empire in the early medieval period. Now, that isn't Charlemagne's empire, the Carolingian Empire. You know, it kind of sets a basis that people eye very greedily. They would like to.
Matt Lewis
It's a very nice empire you have over there, Charlemagne. It'd be a shame if someone was to come and take it.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
A shame if all of your sons were idiots and ruined this. But you do have the rise of the Ottonians in the German lands and they are very consciously looking at what Charlemagne did and very consciously looking at what happened in Rome. And they managed to pull together a nice little empire. You know, they have a lot of the German lands. They cram bohemia in the 9th century. You get down into the Italian city states and you create something that we can recognize as the Holy Roman Empire. And you can kind of, you know, if you want to ignore Czech people, which everybody does, it kind of resembles a little bit of something like Germany. And you have. The Franks have kind of coalesced into something that is. Yeah, that's. That's French shaped. Yeah, sure. And there is an idea of England that has arisen at this time. You have people who are referring to themselves as angles. And so these things kind of let you know that you've got to the end of the early medieval period. But it also shows you that early medieval people were quite keen to create large entities based on what their ideas of how governing works and should work are about.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, they're not begun to evolution. Which I guess brings us if we pinning our beginning date around 476. When are we going to pin our end date? When does the early medieval period end? And they tear the calendar off and say, right, we're high medieval now, I.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Guess that we tend to say traditionally about the year 1000. This is probably one of those historian things, you know. Oh, it's just so neat. Look, oh, look. Oh. And then it's the year 1000.
Matt Lewis
It's a nice round Number, you know, who doesn't like a lovely round number?
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
And everything's changed, you know, and. But there are certain things that I would say are very different around there. For example, you've got these states that have come into being. You have architectures changing up a little bit, which is interesting. You have more large Romanesque buildings being built. A big thing that you have is cities again. Everyone's like, remember cities. And not only do you have big cities again, but you have big cities in places where the Romans could never have cities. You know, like, you've got huge cities that are developing in the German lands and the lowlands. Certainly you have in England more than just Londinium. Imagine.
Matt Lewis
I look forward to those days once again, when there's more than just London.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
The other thing, thing that I think is really important to talk about with this too is also you have the formation of the Church as a legal entity. Because there is this tendency that when you look at the Middle Ages, everyone goes, ah, the Church. And it was like very powerful. And it was this legal thing. And I'm like, well, baby, not in the early medieval period. The early medieval period was mostly. Well, in the first place, you couldn't even get Christians to agree on what Christianity was like for a long time. The Arian heresy, which is now a heresy, which basically, long story short, the Aryan heresy is thinking that the Trinity has kind of like a running order where God is biggest and then your boy JC and then the Holy Spirit. And that eventually loses out to what we think of as generalized Christianity now. But long running competition there, no one could really agree on that. You do have the Pope in Rome going, hey, guys, I'm the Pope, it's me, the Bishop of Rome, I'm the Pope, I'm a really important guy. And everyone's like, you sure are. What an important guy. You know, but like The Pope in 752 can't tell someone in London what to do. Like, I mean, you might use it to be like, I'm very fancy, I met the Pope, but it's not going to like control whether you live or die. And if you go over to Constantinople, everyone's like, yeah, I don't care about him.
Matt Lewis
We've got a patriarch.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Yeah, this is the Patriarch of Constantinople. And I might call together the Patriarch of Constantinople, Jerusalem and Alexandria to have a little confab. You know, famously Charlemagne gets crowned by the Pope as emperor, but it's because they had to rescue the Pope because he was getting beaten down in the street in Rome because people didn't like him. These aren't important guys in the way that they become in the high medieval period. And certainly by the year 1000, them writing for hundreds of years being like, I am the Pope and I am very important, has finally taken hold. And by the year 1000, everyone goes, oh, that's the Pope, he's very important. And that's something that most Western Europeans can agree on. Whereas, tell you what, in 832, they wouldn't all agree on that.
Matt Lewis
Yeah, I think the rise of the Pope is incredibly significant, kind of through the 11th century. And there is a lot of argument now about how apocalyptic people felt about the year 1000 as well. You know, are they thinking, you know, we've survived Y1K, we didn't all fall foul to some apocalyptic computer bug. You do get bits in the Bible that suggest that Christchurch is going to reign for a thousand years. So when you get to the year a thousand, there's some monks in France are thinking, this could be a bit squeaky. I mean, it's probably not on everyone's mind. You know, not everyone was calendaring dates in those terms. You're talking in regnal years of kings. Who knows if it's the year 1000? But there is a small school of thought that that was going to be the end of Christ's reign. So it's fairly significant. You wake up on the 1st of January, 1001 and go, oh, we did it, we made it. It's not quite as bad as I thought it was going to be. So we'll start a whole new era around here. I find it harder, I think, to hang the end of the early medieval period than I do the beginning, because I think a hugely entirely Anglo centric view is to look at 1066. But we're often guilty of that. You sweep away the Anglo Saxon kingdom of England, replace it with the Norman kingdom, and that begins a new period in history, because it begins a new period for England. That's an incredibly empire way of viewing history. But I think you can almost make an argument for stretching it towards the preaching of the First Crusade in 1095, which I think is a defining moment in the power of the Pope to put himself in charge of Europe and to harness all of Christendom and to gather them together and point them somewhere else. That I think is a defining moment and it changes the focus of Christian Europe. They're not no longer talking about, you know, what date should we have Easter on and who's the most important archbishop in England and Whatever else, they're thinking, there is an existential threat to the east that we can focus on instead. I mean, they're never very good at it because Christians love fighting Christians. It's far less distance to travel to just go and bash your neighbor than to go all the way to hot, sweaty Jerusalem and do some fighting over there. But there is an idea there in kind of 1095 that you can kind of gather together all of Christian Europe under the Pope in a way that you hadn't ever been able to do before. You can almost make an argument for a cutoff point there. So I find the end of the early medieval period much harder to pin down than the beginning of it.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Yeah, I completely agree with you. I think that the Crusades is a really big deal there because we have a unified idea of Christendom. And certainly also we have a kind of confused Eastern Rome when confronted with this, you know, because when the Crusaders show up, everyone in Constantinople is like, what the hell is this? You know, you've got this new sort of fracturing where they're like, I'm not really sure I see myself reflected in these guys who have showed up, whereas before, you know, I think around 650, everyone would go, yeah, yeah, sure, that's a Christian, you know, so you have these new identities and ways of looking at religion that have coalesced. And I do think that that is sort of the high medieval period encapsulated this idea of Christendom, these flourishing things. And I mean, I think that is as good a cutoff point as we can sort of get. But the point is, you know, this is messy. You know, when we want to make and use terms like this, it's supposed to make it easier to have a conversation about it. It's supposed to make it easier to write about it or, or flag these things up. And anytime you want to make something easier, what it's doing is obscuring the fact that it is a mess down there. So we come up with terms like early medieval to just make it a little bit easier on everyone else. Where, you know, it's like a swan gliding over the water below. You know, our feet are paddling furiously, attempting to say, oh, I don't know, is this high or early?
Matt Lewis
It's difficult to say, monks running away from Vikings on the seashores, under the water, but on top, we'll just call it the early medieval period and it will sound absolutely lovely.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Isn't it gorgeous?
Matt Lewis
Like the dawn, the early morning, the birds are singing, all of that kind of stuff. I mean, it'd be great to hear from listeners as well what they think about this. Is early Medieval period a useful way of talking about history? When should we think it begins? When should we think it ends? Does it matter how precise we are? Is it a huge issue that we're massively Eurocentric when we talk about this form of periodization? Is there a better option? I don't know the answer to any of those questions. It'd be great to hear what listeners think.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
I'll tell you one thing, Matt, there's a worse term, which is Dark Ages, because if you use it, I will come to your house in shorts and I will arm wrestle you. That's the Eleanor Yaniga promise. Okay, so, you know, I suppose a threat of arm wrestling is as good a place as any to leave this. This.
Matt Lewis
It's been an absolute joy. I can see my guard is coming to return me to my cell. I'll be back on Friday.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Goodbye Matt. Thank you so much for coming on and geeking out with me. This has been a delight as always. Thanks so much to Matt once again for joining me. And thank you for listening to Gone Medieval from History Hit. If you were interested in the early Middle Ages, why not check out our episodes on Charlemagne, Iconoclasm, or the Venerable Bead? Remember, you can enjoy unlimited access to award winning original TV documentaries that are released weekly and ad free podcasts by signing up@historyhit.com subscription there are some fabulous films that we've made for you to enjoy, including my recent celebration of Medieval Winter alongside the wonderful Matt Lewis. You can follow Gone Medieval on Spotify where you can leave us comments and suggestions or wherever you get your podcasts and tell all your friends and family that you have gone medieval. Otherwise, Matt Lewis will be back on Friday for more medieval action and I'll see you as always next Tuesday until.
Dan Snow
Enjoy a brilliant sleep experience with Soundcore from Anchor Stressed out by your partner's snoring? Having trouble falling asleep? Waking up too easily? Suffering from poor quality sleep? Now put on Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds. Experience unparalleled pressure free comfort perfect for side sleepers. Choose your favorite sound in your curated playlist. Feel your body getting lighter and lighter and enjoy a full night of peaceful sleep with the A20's long lasting battery. Then wake up feeling fresh with a personal built in alarm. Get the sleep you deserve with Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds. Discover more on soundcore.coms o u N D C O R E Soundcore use code sleep at Checkout to get $30 off S L E E P in all caps.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Auto insurance can all seem the same.
Dan Snow
Until it comes time to use it.
Matt Lewis
So don't get stuck paying more for less coverage. Switch to USA Auto insurance and you could start saving money in no time.
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
Get a quote today. Restrictions apply.
Matt Lewis
USA.
Gone Medieval: Why the Early Middle Ages Matter – Episode Summary
Released: February 4, 2025 | Host: History Hit's Matt Lewis and Dr. Eleanor Jaunega
In this enlightening episode of Gone Medieval, hosts Matt Lewis and Dr. Eleanor Jaunega delve deep into the significance of the Early Middle Ages, exploring its complexities, misconceptions, and enduring impact on European history. Through a blend of scholarly insight and engaging dialogue, the episode sheds light on why this period, often overshadowed by later medieval developments, is crucial for understanding the broader historical narrative.
Defining Medieval Terms
Dr. Jaunega opens the discussion by tackling the concept of periodization—the method historians use to segment history into distinct eras for easier study and discussion. She emphasizes the challenges inherent in this process:
"Periodization is one of those things that is instantly imperfect, but kind of what is the option?" ([05:27])
Matt adds to this by highlighting the Eurocentric bias in historical periodization:
"We will talk about the medieval period in what is a very Western Europe centric way. It takes zero account of China, Japan, Africa, the Americas." ([06:45])
Analogies and Clarifications
To simplify periodization, Dr. Jaunega compares it to placing a bucket in the ocean—focusing on a subset without capturing the entirety:
"It's sort of like you're putting a bucket into the ocean and you can look into that bucket and you can see what you can see in there and make generalities about the ocean as a whole." ([07:35])
Matt further illustrates the concept using the Star Wars saga, explaining how splitting events into parts makes the narrative digestible:
"You could have edited those films differently. Those beginning and endings could have been in a different place. The focus could have been different." ([07:35])
Pejorative Beginnings
Matt references Dan Jones's Power and Thrones to explain how the term "Middle Ages" originated with a negative connotation from Protestant thinkers aiming to contrast their era with what they perceived as the superstitious and dogmatic medieval period:
"Middle Ages instantly becomes this pejorative term for everything in between what was good and what is good." ([10:29])
Political and Commercial Motivations
Dr. Jaunega discusses the political motivations behind labeling medieval architecture as "Gothic," a term coined by Italians to disparage what they saw as Germanic influences:
"All we know about the medieval period or takes the time to look at it, you know, the idea that they didn't have Plato or Aristotle, all they have is Plato and Aristotle." ([12:01])
Clarifying Terminology
The hosts tackle the widespread misuse of the term "Dark Ages." Dr. Jaunega clarifies its original meaning:
"For historians, the term Dark Ages refers to a lack of sources, not intellectual decline." ([24:20])
Origins of the Term
The term "Dark Ages" was initially coined by the 16th-century church historian Caesar Baronius to describe the 10th and 11th centuries due to the scarcity of written records:
"He coined this term 'saeculum obscurum,' referring to the 10th and 11th centuries because we just didn't keep as many texts from them." ([24:20])
Challenging Popular Perceptions
Matt and Dr. Jaunega argue against the notion that the Early Middle Ages were intellectually stagnant. They highlight significant advancements and cultural developments during this period:
"It's hard to see those big seismic shifts, but that doesn't mean that everything stayed the same. And it doesn't mean that people weren't developing and having ideas and creating things." ([13:56])
Agricultural Advancements
Dr. Jaunega emphasizes the revolutionary impact of the three-field system on European agriculture, which led to increased food production and population growth:
"The three field system, which no one thinks is particularly sexy, but it revolutionizes farming ... more people to move into cities and they can make art." ([14:33])
Technological and Intellectual Progress
Matt highlights medieval innovations such as the church clock and discusses the broader spectrum of intellectual developments across the millennium:
"There is the not quite the completion of Christianization because we'll still have lots of pagans ... but you have got that kind of watershed moment where Christianity is reaching the parts it's never previously been able to reach." ([15:31], [14:33])
The Fall of the Western Roman Empire
The episode scrutinizes the traditional start date of the Early Middle Ages—476 AD, marking the deposition of Romulus Augustulus by Odoacer:
"The Early Medieval period begins in 476 with the so-called fall of the Roman Empire. And this is one of those things where... it wouldn't have been the flick of a switch." ([17:38])
Continuity of Roman Influence
Dr. Jaunega and Matt discuss how the collapse of Western Rome was less abrupt and more a gradual transformation, with Eastern Rome (Byzantium) continuing to thrive:
"The Western Roman emperors had for some time largely just been puppets of eastern Rome." ([19:32])
Theodoric the Great's Reign
They explore the reign of Ostrogothic King Theodoric the Great, who maintained Roman traditions while ruling over Gothic populations:
"Theodoric never calls himself the emperor, but as the region of the Visigoths, he eventually controls a bunch of land that stretches from the Atlantic to the Adriatic." ([23:06])
Cultural and Scientific Renaissance
Matt underscores the flourishing of Islamic civilization during the Early Middle Ages, highlighting its advancements in science, philosophy, and medicine:
"The rise of Islam leads to huge scientific, philosophical, medical advances and the spread of information in a way that wasn't happening in Christian Europe too." ([37:29])
Transmission of Knowledge
Dr. Jaunega explains how Islamic scholars preserved and expanded upon Greek and Roman texts, later translating them into Latin and reintroducing them to Europe:
"When we eventually get more of the classical texts back in Europe, they're often translated out of Arabic and then into Latin." ([38:31])
Al Andalus as a Beacon of Learning
The discussion highlights Al Andalus (medieval Spain) as a center of cultural and intellectual exchange, where Islamic, Christian, and Jewish scholars collaborated:
"You see all of these bright and interesting cultures that are coexisting ... and flourishing at this time." ([38:31])
Consolidation of Power
Matt and Dr. Jaunega delve into the fragmentation and subsequent consolidation of European territories, leading to the emergence of recognizable states:
"By the time we get to the end of the early medieval period, we've probably got a map of Europe at least that looks recognizable today." ([45:09])
The Holy Roman Empire
They discuss the rise of the Holy Roman Empire under the Ottonians, who consciously sought to emulate Charlemagne’s legacy:
"The rise of the Ottonians in the German lands ... creating something that we can recognize as the Holy Roman Empire." ([44:09], [45:41])
Christianization as a Unifying Force
The increasing Christianization of Europe is presented as a driving force in the formation of these states and the consolidation of power under the Church:
"You have the increasing Christianization of the European continent." ([41:51])
Difficult to Pin Down
Determining the end of the Early Medieval period is identified as particularly challenging. Matt considers significant events such as the Norman Conquest of 1066 and the First Crusade of 1095 as potential markers:
"I'm trying to pin our beginning date around 476. When are we going to pin our end date?" ([47:00])
The Crusades as a Turning Point
Dr. Jaunega supports the idea that the First Crusade represents a pivotal moment, marking the consolidation of Christendom under the Pope and shifting the focus of European powers:
"The First Crusade ... is a defining moment in the power of the Pope to put himself in charge of Europe." ([47:14], [52:12])
Unified Christendom vs. Fragmented Europe
The Crusades symbolize the unification of Christian Europe against external threats, contrasting with the earlier fragmented and localized power structures:
"They manage to pull together a nice little empire ... which resembles something like Germany." ([45:41])
Call for Feedback
As the episode nears its conclusion, Matt invites listeners to share their thoughts on the usefulness of the "Early Medieval period" as a historical term, its Eurocentric bias, and alternative periodization methods.
Dr. Jaunega's Final Warning
Dr. Jaunega humorously warns against the misuse of terms like "Dark Ages," asserting her commitment to preserving historical accuracy:
"If you use it [Dark Ages], I will come to your house in shorts and I will arm wrestle you." ([54:22])
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega: "Periodization is one of those things that is instantly imperfect, but kind of what is the option?" ([05:27])
Matt Lewis: "We will talk about the medieval period in what is a very Western Europe centric way. It takes zero account of China, Japan, Africa, the Americas." ([06:45])
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega: "Anytime you want to make something easier, what it's doing is obscuring the fact that it is a mess down there." ([53:41])
Dr. Eleanor Jaunega: "If you use [Dark Ages], I will come to your house in shorts and I will arm wrestle you." ([54:22])
This episode of Gone Medieval successfully demystifies the Early Middle Ages, challenging established narratives and encouraging a more nuanced understanding of the period. By dissecting the origins of key historical terms, highlighting significant cultural and technological advancements, and emphasizing the interconnectedness of global civilizations, Matt Lewis and Dr. Eleanor Jaunega provide listeners with a richer perspective on why the Early Middle Ages truly matter in the grand tapestry of history.
For those intrigued by the Early Middle Ages, Gone Medieval offers further exploration through episodes on Charlemagne, Iconoclasm, and the Venerable Bede. Dive deeper into medieval mysteries and marvels by subscribing to History Hit for unlimited access to award-winning documentaries and ad-free podcasts.