Transcript
A (0:00)
The following is a listener supported ministry from the Grace Evangelical society. Is James 2 really about eternal salvation? What is dead faith? How can we be sure that our faith is profitable? Thank you friend for being here today. This is Grace in Focus. We are a ministry of the Grace Evangelical Society in North Texas. Please come learn more about us at our website faithalone.org including our online free seminary, our subscription free magazine coming out six times per year and our national annual conference happening next year 2026, May 18th through the 21st. That's faithalone.org and now with our question and answer discussion today, here is Bob Wilkin along with Sam Ma.
B (0:51)
We have a question about James 2 from someone named James.
C (0:56)
Yep. So his question saying that he. I'll sum up his email. He saw some of your videos, your videos on James and other videos related convinced him he was previously a four point Calvinist. Now he's no longer. He's been convinced that eternal security is true and that it's necessary to believe in the promise of Jesus, that you have to believe you have everlasting life and that it can't be lost. But he says in debates or conversations he has with people, the most common comeback is James 2. He'll make some kind of statement about eternal security or everlasting life not being lost. And they will respond with James 2. And he has to argue why James 2 does not mean what they think it means. And so real quick, I'll give his three quick points that he says he uses. But now he wants you to give some more points because he says he doesn't find these to be very effective in his debates. First he'll bring up that James never mentions hell, lake of fire, eternal combination, anything like that. So the context for eternal condemnation is not there.
B (2:00)
2.
C (2:01)
James is clearly talking to Christians. We talk about this a lot. It's addressed to my brethren, the beloved brethren, brothers, brothers and sisters. And James also speaks in the first person plural sometimes. When he says he chose us and that we, he's including himself in the conversation. Point three is specifically with James 2 where it says dead faith, er, use that dead faith. If it's dead, then it must have once been alive. We've said things like that before. So in addition to those three points, Bob, what are some strong arguments that you would make if you were having to debate a Calvinist or just anybody that interprets James 2 as faith without works is dead, meaning if you don't have works, you're not a believer or you've lost your everlasting life.
B (2:47)
Yeah. First off, let me clarify. James says he used to be a four point Calvinist. And the implication from what he's saying is when he was, he lacked assurance. And the reason why a 4 or 5 point Calvinist would lack assurance of his or her eternal destiny. David Engelsma is a Calvinist who believes that Puritan thought has so influenced modern Calvinists that they're always on a quest for assurance. And he calls Puritanism and modern Puritanism a gospel of doubt. And I think Engelsma is right. So that's why James could be a four point Calvinist. And the reason he would lack assurance is he would say something like this. Christ only died for the elect. Only the elect are going to persevere to the end of their lives in faith and good works. I don't know if Christ died for me. I don't know if I'm going to persevere to the end of my life in faith and good works. So I look at my works to see if it's likely that I'm on the path of perseverance. But even if I think I'm on the path, I realize I could always fall away. And I've debated a lot of Calvinists who said they're not sure of their eternal destiny because they can't be. Because if Paul himself wasn't sure he was going to persevere, 1st Corinthians 9:27, well then we can't be sure. So what James found is that we could have assurance apart from perseverance. We don't need to look at our works. We need to realize that if we simply believe in Jesus, we have everlasting life and we're secure forever. And like you were saying, I think James now holds the view that the bullseye in evangelism is Jesus promise of everlasting life that can't be lost. And when you summarized him as saying we must believe that the salvation Jesus gives is eternal, that we can't lose it, we what that means is in order to be born again, we need to believe that. Now of course, once we believe it, we're secure even if we stop believing it. So in terms now of his question on James 2, I would give James a couple of answers beyond what you say. First of all, when you say there's no eternal condemnation in James, I don't think that's a real helpful argument because James 2:14. Do you have it there, Sam? What does that say?
