Listen now | The CEO of FullEnrich unpacks why one data vendor is never enough, how cold calling still wins when the list is right, and why audience-first beats GTM-engineering-first.

Brought to you by

This could be your logo!

Reach out to Jared to sponsor the next episode of this podcast and reach 5000+ modern GTM operator and founders.

About our guest — Benjamin Douablin

Benjamin Douablin is the CEO and co-founder of FullEnrich, the waterfall enrichment platform serving 3,000+ customers across the US, Europe, APAC, MENA and Latam. FullEnrich aggregates 20+ data vendors and queries them sequentially until you get the email or mobile number you actually need — then plugs into the CRM, data warehouse, automation tool, or MCP server you already run. Ben came up through pure sales tech with stints at Sales Ramp and Jellyfish before building an internal data-aggregation tool that became FullEnrich two and a half years ago.

Core Takeaways

* One Data Provider Is Never Enough: A generalist returns roughly a 30% enrichment rate against most addressable markets. Coverage breaks down by region, by vertical, and by segment. The winning shape is a managed orchestration layer that picks the right provider per query in real time, not a stack of disconnected vendors that operators have to manually benchmark.

* Your List Is The Strategy: FullEnrich’s first 40 customers came through cold calls Ben placed himself. The unlock wasn’t the script. It was the prep — convincing yourself the call is a blessing for the prospect before you dial. If there’s no real issue to solve, don’t book the meeting. Open with a “because” that names a problem peers in their industry face, never their own performance, and let them choose the one that resonates.

* Audience-First Beats GTM-Engineering-First: The discipline is a means; the audience is the end. FullEnrich serves three distinct audiences (GTM teams, lead-gen and talent agencies, product builders embedding the API). Each one has different acquisition motion, product needs, contract structure. Build squads around the audience, not the tooling — and let GTM-engineering capacity serve the squads where it actually moves the metric.

* Stop Building 25-Slide Decks: The bar to execute has dropped; the bar to convince has stayed high. That asymmetry is the lever. If you’re a VP with an idea, hire someone to ship the zero-to-one in days, demo the result, then politick. Pitching internally before you’ve proven anything is the slow path that closes your learning window.

Enjoying this episode so far? Subscribe for free to new posts.

Top Quotes

“I don’t know anyone that is really happy with their data providers, even if they multiply them.”

“If you don’t know who you want to talk to, just don’t even think about it, don’t start, because you will get rejected, it will be hard.”

“I never start with the tools or with the skills. I always start from my audience or end users.”

“Having people that know how great look like is very important because the danger of AI is just very well articulated MBA type of intern that know how to write down very articulated way. But when you go into details, you need to be picky.”

Referenced Tools and Resources

* Data and enrichment: FullEnrich (aggregating 20+ vendors)

* CRM and data infrastructure: Salesforce, Snowflake

* Workflow automation: Clay, n8n, Zapier

* AI and agents: Claude Code, MCP server (FullEnrich), HubSpot MCP

* Movement origins: “Forward-deployed engineer” (Palantir), GTM engineer (Clay)

Timestamps

* (02:37) Welcome to S2E6 — the data infrastructure layer of GTM engineering, Ben’s bio (Sales Ramp, Jellyfish, FullEnrich)

* (04:13) Ben’s intro — FullEnrich origin, 20+ data vendors, usage-based model, integrations everywhere

* (07:13) What’s changed in GTM engineering — the Palantir comparison, why Clay launched the movement

* (09:12) Beyond GTM — recruiter and talent acquisition use cases, Snowflake as system of record

* (12:07) Where the movement is being oversold — ex-spray-and-prey agencies rebranding as engineers

* (14:50) Does GTM engineering 10x the rest of the sales org? The hire profile question

* (16:22) Claude Code hype — siloed adoption, FullEnrich’s MCP server, the chat-as-blank-page problem

* (20:36) Why one data provider isn’t enough — coverage gaps, the benchmarking pain

* (23:08) The orchestration layer — managed waterfall by industry, region, segment

* (26:02) Cold calling as a growth lever — your list is the strategy

* (28:36) Tone of voice on the call — don’t push, don’t sound salesy, ask permission

* (29:51) Have a reason to call — the “because” frame that earns attention

* (30:37) Don’t touch the prospect’s ego — name the problems peers face, let them pick

* (31:50) What’s next for the enrichment industry — global coverage, verification, decision layer

* (34:28) Hiring for GTM in the AI era — what separates good from great

* (42:47) AI as the well-articulated MBA intern — polish hides shallow work

* (44:20) How FullEnrich structures its GTM org — three audiences, three squads

* (50:00) Agencies vs in-house — main motion in-house, $20–50K budget for new motions

* (53:41) Stop-doing for VPs — demo the zero-to-one before building the deck

* (55:56) Closing — audience first, list is strategy, AI with growth mindset

Where to Find Benjamin

* LinkedIn

* FullEnrich

Where to Connect with Jared & Matteo

* Matteo Tittarelli, GTM Engineer School Co-founder: LinkedIn, X, Website, Newsletter

* Jared Waxman, GTM Engineer School Co-founder: LinkedIn

Thanks for reading GTM Engineer School! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit gtmengineerschool.substack.com