The future of the Democratic party, with Josh Shapiro

Summary

Podcast Summary

Podcast: GZERO World with Ian Bremmer
Episode: The future of the Democratic Party, with Josh Shapiro
Date: June 20, 2026
Guest: Governor Josh Shapiro (Pennsylvania)

---

Episode Overview

In this episode of GZERO World, Ian Bremmer interviews Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a rising Democratic star and potential 2028 presidential contender, during his visit to Toronto, Canada. Their conversation spans US-Canada relations, the future of the USMCA trade agreement, the economic and political fallout of President Trump’s Iran war, shifting US policy towards Israel, the Democratic Party’s record and strategy after recent electoral struggles, regulation of AI and technology, and the national crisis of public trust.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. US-Canada Relations and North American Trade ([02:26]–[06:12])

• Shapiro on the Current State:

  • “The President of the United States has poked his finger in the eye of our allies, including Canada... When he refers to Canada as the 51st state, he not only does damage to our economic partnership, he erodes the trust that is necessary between our two countries.” ([02:43], Shapiro)
  • Shapiro highlights the essential economic ties between Pennsylvania and Canada, noting $14 billion annually in imports and exports for his state.

• Updating USMCA:

  • Shapiro acknowledges that the USMCA needs modernization, particularly regarding:
    • Chinese supply chain inputs
    • Service sector (e.g., streaming)
  • “It is important that we update it, but we’ve got to work constructively... I don’t believe it is a zero-sum game that if the United States benefits, Canada has to suffer. I think both can benefit.” ([04:40], Shapiro)

• Tariffs and Inflation:

  • Shapiro links inflation above 4% to damaging tariffs and the President's “war of choice in Iran,” stating these policies raised costs for Americans and hurt US farmers and manufacturers.

2. The War in Iran & Foreign Policy Consequences ([06:12]–[08:49])

• Domestic Fallout:

  • “We’re seeing American people and the good people of Pennsylvania see the effects of this war of choice every single day when they go to the gas pump and they’re paying over four bucks a gallon for gas.” ([06:32], Shapiro)
  • Shapiro condemns the administration’s lack of clear rationale for the war, arguing it's deepened US isolation, destabilized the region, and failed to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

• Critique of Outcomes:

  • “The effect of this war has been to replace a 90-year-old Ayatollah with a roughly 60-year-old Ayatollah who’s even more hardline... It is time to bring this war to an end and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.” ([06:32], Shapiro)

3. Shifting US Policy Toward Israel and the Middle East ([08:49]–[11:20])

• Policy Changes:

  • Shapiro calls for changes to the Memorandum of Understanding on US arms sales to Israel and advocates for global efforts towards a two-state solution.
  • “One of the first things that needs to change is the MoU [on] arms sales. [Netanyahu] wants to begin to wean off of American arms, and I think that’s an important step.” ([08:49], Shapiro)
  • Supports the creation of a broad, regional peace including Arab countries: “It is important to create stability in that region for US interests.” ([09:59], Shapiro)

• Vision for Peace:

  • “We need to make sure that Palestinians, not Hamas, but the Palestinian people, have the ability to see their kids grow up... to be in a place where that stability leads to greater stability across the globe.” ([10:28], Shapiro)

4. Lessons for the Democratic Party ([11:20]–[13:19])

• Shapiro’s PA Blueprint:

  • Positions himself as a “GSD Democrat – get stuff done Democrat.” ([11:39], Shapiro)
  • “We've delivered results not just to Democrats, but independents and Republicans as well.” ([11:39], Shapiro)
  • Points to bipartisan achievements: tax cuts, job growth, education investments, and safer communities.

• Restoring Trust Through Results:

  • Emphasizes need for the party to be seen as delivering for everyday Americans—“bring down costs, make their kids’ schools better, make their streets safer.” ([12:43], Shapiro)

5. Governing Amidst Polarization & Division ([13:19]–[14:30])

• Message for Democrats in D.C.:
  • “It’s focusing on the things that matter most... schools and safety, being able to live in a community you can afford...” ([13:43], Shapiro)
  • Advocates for Democrats being “the party of real freedom” (women’s health, parental choice, freedom to read, etc.).

6. Technology, AI, and Regulation ([14:30]–[19:03])

• PA as a Model for Tech Policy:

  • Details his proposal for “GRID,” requiring new data centers to provide and pay for their own power, maintain transparency, and protect local resources.
  • “I was the first governor... to sign an executive order actually deploying AI tools into the hands of our workforce... None of whom have been replaced because we’ve said this is a job enhancer, not a job replacer.” ([14:51], Shapiro)

• Call for Federal Regulation of AI:

  • Criticizes the President for a “complete hands-off approach” and argues tech companies want clearer rules: “Leaving it up to these tech guys to make their own rules, that is the exact same wrong approach.” ([16:31], Shapiro)
  • Cites Pennsylvania’s lawsuit against Character AI for impersonating a medical professional and dispensing health advice—calls for federal standards to protect youth. ([17:48], Shapiro)

7. National Crisis of Trust ([19:03]–[22:39])

• Rebuilding Trust Through Governance:

  • “I believe government can be a force for good... What we have seen for many years is the government actually failing to address people’s problems.” ([19:35], Shapiro)

• Everyday Examples:

  • “You walk into the DMV... and walk out 20 minutes later, not two hours later. You walk out having a good experience and maybe it cures a bit of that distrust, a bit of that cynicism...” ([19:35], Shapiro)

• Harsh Critique of President Trump:

  • Claims Trump’s divisive language and policies (“chaos, corruption, cruelty”) are eroding civic trust and the social compact.
  • “He attacks Americans based on what they look like, where they come from, who they love, who they pray to... We've got to get back to having a commander in chief... to lift up our entire country.” ([21:41], Shapiro)

8. Shapiro’s 2028 Ambitions? ([22:39]–[23:40])

• On His Slogan:
  • Dodges speculation about a presidential run, focusing instead on his reelection campaign in Pennsylvania.
  • “Every day I go out, they know my motto is GSD. Get stuff done. Because I believe government can be a force for good in people's lives.” ([22:55], Shapiro)
• Bremmer jokes about “God save democracy” as a possible slogan ([23:35]).

---

Memorable Quotes

• “We need an administration in Washington focused on global peace in the region... that would be my hope.” ([09:59], Shapiro)
• "I'm a proud GSD Democrat. Get stuff done." ([11:39], Shapiro)
• “Leaving it up to these tech guys to make their own rules, that is the exact same wrong approach.” ([16:31], Shapiro)
• "I believe government can be a force for good in people's lives. You've got to get stuff done, you've got to deliver. And that's what I do every day in the Commonwealth." ([22:55], Shapiro)

---

Timestamps for Notable Segments

• [02:43] – Shapiro on US-Canada Trust and Economic Ties
• [04:40] – The Future of USMCA and Tariff Policy
• [06:32] – The Consequences & Critique of the Iran War
• [08:49] – Rethinking US Policy Toward Israel
• [11:39] – Shapiro’s Lessons for the Democratic Party
• [14:51] – Using & Regulating AI in Pennsylvania
• [17:48] – The Character AI Lawsuit and Youth Protection
• [19:35] – Governance, Trust, and Everyday Government
• [21:41] – On Civic Unity and Critique of President Trump
• [22:55] – Shapiro’s Leadership Motto: GSD – Get Stuff Done

---

Conclusion

This wide-ranging conversation with Governor Josh Shapiro highlights his pragmatic, bipartisan approach to governance, sharp criticisms of President Trump’s foreign and domestic record, and his vision for an updated Democratic Party rooted in results, regulation, and equity. Shapiro resists speculation about 2028, but his “get stuff done” response and policy focus offer a clear preview of how he’d approach the nation’s challenges. The episode provides an in-depth look at evolving US politics at a critical moment of domestic division and international uncertainty.

Transcript

[A]

Hello and welcome to the Gzero World Podcast. I'm Ian Bremmer and here you can find extended versions of my show on public television. The United States and Canada are hosting the World cup together along with Mexico. But it's not all Kumbaya. President Donald Trump is threatening not to renew the USMCA, that trade agreement that underpins roughly 2 trillion in annual North American commerce. You he has also repeatedly suggested that America doesn't need very much from Canada. You know, the 51st state. But Canada remains America's second largest trading partner. And for many actual US States, the relationship is essential. Trade with Canada supports jobs, investment, manufacturing, agriculture and energy production across the United States. And few states know that better than Pennsylvania. My guest today, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, who recently joined me in Canada where he met with business leaders and and government officials to discuss trade, investment and the economic ties connecting his state to our neighbor to the north. He even found time to catch up Phillies Blue Jays game. Along the way, Shapiro governs one of the most politically important states in America. He's also become one of the Democratic Party's most prominent voices and he's frequently mentioned as a contender for the White House in 2028. That makes Josh a useful guide for some of the biggest questions facing the country right now. What does America's changing relationship with its allies mean for states and businesses? How should the United States think about the conflicts reshaping the Middle East? Is government prepared for the disruption artificial intelligence could bring to workers in the economy? And as the country heads towards another contentious midterm election, what lessons have the Democrats actually learned from their defeats? We cover all that and more in a wide ranging conversation. So let's get to it. Here's my conversation with Pennsylvania Governor.

[B]

The Gzero World Podcast is brought to you by our lead sponsor, prologis. Prologis helps businesses across the globe scale their supply chains with an expansive portfolio of logistics, real estate and the only end to end solutions platform addressing the critical initiatives of global logistics today. Learn [e-mail] Josh Shapiro.

[C]

Governor Josh Shapiro, welcome to the show.

[D]

Great to be with you.

[C]

So here we are in Toronto and you know Prime Minister Mark Carney back at the beginning of the year troubled U.S. canada relationship and said that there had been a rupture in the global order that the United States was responsible for. How do you think about that? How do you respond to that kind of a statement?

[D]

I think it's clear that the President of the United States has poked his finger in the eye of Our allies, including Canada. I think when he berates the Canadian people and when he berates the Canadian leaders and refers to Canada as the 51st state, he not only does damage to our economic partnership, he erodes the trust that is necessary between our two countries for both countries to be able to thrive, for both countries to be able to succeed. Part of the reason I'm here is because Canada is an incredibly important trading partner with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. We export about $14 billion a year to Canada and we import about $14 billion a year from Canada. It is a balanced relationship. It's important for our farmers, it's important for our manufacturers. And so for the President to go and unilaterally sort of verbally strike at Canada like that not only creates a division economically, but it erodes the trust that has been so essential historical partnership. It is true that the relationship needs to mold and adapt and change and update with the times. But the way you do that with a friend is addressing your differences in a constructive manner, not attacking them. The way the President has so Liberation

[C]

Day at this point was over a year ago. There were a lot of views expressed that these countries around the world are taking advantage of the United States economically. We're letting them free ride on the largest of the United States. USMCA is a big component of America's trade relationship globally and right now is under some stress. First of all, is there any truth in your view to the fact that the U.S. canada Trade Relationship is imbalanced and needs to be redressed in America's favor?

[D]

I think you're raising two issues. Let me try and address both.

[C]

Sure.

[D]

First, the USMCA needs to be updated. It needs to deal with certain issues that have emerged that since it was signed during the first Trump administration. Give you a couple of examples. We've got to address Chinese inputs in this system. We've got a second. We've got to address different parts of the service, economy, streaming and other issues like that. So it is important that we update it. But we've got to work constructively on updating the deal in a way that benefits the United States. And I don't believe it is a zero sum game that if the United States benefits, Canada has to suffer. I think both can benefit. Obviously, my focus is on the economy in Pennsylvania and strengthening the ties in the United States. Strengthening the economy in the United States. On the first part of what you said as it relates to tariffs, understand what the President did was push a button and not only erode that trust with Canada and other countries. But he raised costs on the American people. We saw inflation hit above 4% today. Obviously his war of choice in Iran is one reason for that. The added cost because of tariffs is another reason for that. We've seen market shudder for our farmers in Pennsylvania. We see everything basically cost more as a result of of these tariffs. I think what the President's done is really harmed our economy. It's made things cost more and it's really set the American economy back. He loves to brag about how the stock market reached a high or close to a high. Well, that's nice for some, but the vast majority of Pennsylvanians are hurting with higher costs because of the President's economic policies.

[C]

So if you're going to bring up affordability and inflation, we have to talk about Iran. And it has been the war in Iran and the dis of the Strait of Hormuz that has been a direct feed input into those increased costs. We're several months into this war right now. That's right. How would you address this going forward? What should the Americans be doing?

[D]

Well, look, we're seeing American people and the good people of Pennsylvania see the effects of this war of choice every single day when they go to the gas pump and they're paying over four bucks a gallon for gas. And of course the cost of a barrel of oil has an impact on so many different points in our economy. So you're seeing everything cost more because the President's war of choice. The President was unclear as to why we were going into Iran in the first place, which is why it's been so damn hard for him to get out because he doesn't know why he went in. He never articulated a clear vision to the American people or to our allies. We are more isolated in the world because of the President's decision to strike unilaterally. The effect of this war has been to replace 90 year old Ayatollah with a roughly 60 year old Ayatollah who's even more hardline. The effect of this war has been not to dismantle all of their nuclear capabilities and destroy the materials, but rather it seems that the Iranians continued to possess that material based on public reporting. Their arsenal of weapons were not degraded to the point that the President has said in his bloviation and in his rhetoric that has been really irresponsible in this. And I think he's isolated us further in the world. It is time to bring this war to an end and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. And then it seems that the President continues to be knocking on the door of a deal to do that and then negotiate the nuclear pieces next. It would be unfortunate if after all that, that's where we find ourselves in effect, in the same place when it comes to nuclear material and in a place where our economy has taken in a hit and in a place where now the Iranians control the Strait of Hormu. He's got to figure out a way to get himself out of this mess that he created. And every day this goes on, it costs the people of Pennsylvania even more and cost the American people even more.

[C]

Cost the people of Canada even more as well. So President Trump made the decision unilaterally to go into the war in Iran, but they went into war with Israel. Israel is not as popular in the United States today as it was five years ago, 10 years ago, especially among young people, including in Pennsylvania. Do you think US Policy towards Israel needs to change? And if.

[D]

Well, it's clear it needs to change. And I think it needs to change in a way that benefits America's national security interests first and foremost. I think one of the first things that needs to change is the MoU that relates to arms sales. I think Prime Minister Netanyahu said recently they want to begin to wean off of American arms. And I think that that is an important step. I think second, we need to make sure that the US Administration is, is pushing for a global peace in the region. I'm someone who has supported a two state solution. A Palestinian state and the Israelis living side by side in peace, where that Palestinian state recognizes Israel's right to exist, where the terrorist group Hamas is not in charge of that Palestinian state, where they have self determination on the other side of that border. I think that's in America's national security interest. But let me be clear, that should not just include the Palestinians and the Israelis. I think you need to have a global, if you will, peace in the Middle east with the 20 plus Arab nations joining into a broader Abraham Accords or whatever that would be called. It is important to create stability in that region for U.S. interests. And that would be my hope, that we could have an administration in Washington that's focused on that.

[C]

There was a broad agreement with the United States and most everyone in the region in terms of a phase one of a peace deal. You even got a Security Council resolution in favor of that. But as you say, absent a Palestinian state, it's very hard to imagine how the vision that you just put together would actually emerge this is where American

[D]

leadership needs to come in. A lot of folks, I say this respectfully, have said, well, is that really reasonable? Is that really a possibility? I should say in this political climate, it must be. We need to make sure that there is stability and peace in the region. We need to make sure that Palestinians, not Hamas, but the Palestinian people, have the ability to see their kids grow up and be anything they want to be. To grow up and not viewing the Israelis on the other side of the border as the enemy. And to be in a place where that stability leads to greater stability across the globe. And that is in America's national security interest. And we should have an administration focused on that work.

[C]

Josh, if you don't mind, I want to turn to the home front for a little bit, and the Democratic Party has not covered itself in glory over the past few years and it's not enormously popular right now. What are the lessons that the party should learn from the last election? What are the lessons the party needs to learn to make sure they're more successful going forward?

[D]

Look, I come from Pennsylvania, the ultimate swing state, and I'm a proud GSD Democrat. I get stuff done Democrat. I've won every election I've ever run, set a record each time I've run. I think that's largely been because we've delivered results to not just Democrats, but independents and Republicans as well. We've created, as a result of our working in a bipartisan way, better schools, safer communities. We've got the only growing economy in the northeastern part of the United States, created more jobs than all but two states in the country. We cut taxes seven different times in Pennsylvania, bringing Democrats and Republicans together. Our economy has done more on economic development.

[B]

The Gzero World podcast is brought to you by our lead sponsor, prologis. Prologis helps businesses across the globe scale their supply chains with an expansive portfolio of logistics, real estate, and the only end to end solutions platform addressing the critical initiatives of global logistics today. Learn [e-mail] during my term than the

[D]

15 years combined prior to me taking office. Why do I share that with you? Because that to me is the recipe for success for not just our party, but for our states and for our country going forward. I think one of the reasons why folks are so frustrated is they don't see their elected leaders delivering results that make their lives better, to bring down costs, to make their kids schools better, make their streets safer. We're doing that in Pennsylvania. I'm proud of that work and I think we need to elevate elected officials, elevate candidates who are focused on doing that work, not just making a lot of noise, but doing that work that makes people's lives better.

[C]

Now, if you're a member of House, you're a member of the Senate, it's a little bit more challenging in the sense that you're part of a group to get stuff done. A governor, you know, mayor actually runs something.

[A]

Right.

[C]

It's a little easier to run for things as a consequence. If you're talking to the Democratic Party as a whole and recognizing just how polarized Congress is, just how little gets legislated right now. How does the Democratic Party get to deliver that message?

[D]

I think it's focusing on the things that matter most in people's lives. Schools and safety, being able to live in a community that you can afford, where you're going to have a job and opportunity for your kids going forward. I think Democrats are the party of real freedom. Real freedom that allows women to make decisions over their own bodies, allows parents like me and my wife Lori to make decisions over what vaccines our kids are going to be able to get, that they can read the books that they want to read, not have certain one banned by certain politicians. The point I'm making here is that we can be a pro freedom party and a pro growth party, a pro safety party, a pro education party. That is what we're doing in Pennsylvania. We're winning in Pennsylvania in the toughest state in the country to win in. And that is what I think we need to see more of, not just in our party, but all across America.

[C]

Can you be a pro tech party? Can you be a pro data center party? Americans are increasingly scared of. They're more negative about it than almost any other country in the world. And it's changed quickly, and the US has become what it is because of innovation, because of technology, because of entrepreneurship. How does the Democratic Party and how do you address that going forward?

[D]

Well, I don't really view these things as Democrat. I view these things as a governor, a governor who's focused on delivering for people and making their lives better. And I would say that on both utilizing AI and the infrastructure of AI, think data centers. We need to have responsible regulations. Let me explain. On data centers, I put Forth Grid, which is my plan in Pennsylvania that says you want to build a data center there, you've got to bring your own power, you got to pay for your own power. You got to be transparent with the local community, meaning tell them who the hyperscaler is. Tell them what's going to go on there. You've got to have a local benefits agreement to help that community and you've got to protect the water sources that are used to cool off those facilities as a result of grid. I think a lot of these specul that make a lot of noise that rightfully upset the communities, they're going to fall by the wayside as it relates to the use of AI. I was the first governor in the entire country to sign an executive order actually deploying AI tools into the hands of our workforce. Our workers, none of whom have been replaced because we've said this is a job enhancer, not a job replacer. Our workers report that they're saving about 90, 95 minutes a day utilizing these tools. Now when we dispatched those tools into people's hands, we worked with experts at Carnegie Mellon University, Penn State Penn and other leaders in the tech industry in Pennsylvania to ensure that we were deploying these tools in a way that brought integrity to the process, in a way that responsibly used this technology that protected people's private personal information. I think you've got to use these tools in a way that is responsible. The problem I have in the United States is the manner in which the President of the United States has just allowed the tech companies to do whatever they want. He's taken a total and complete hands off approach. You could talk to some of these tech CEOs. They want responsible regulation. They want clear rules of the road. What the President has done is said there are no rules and we'll leave it up to you. And let me tell you something, leaving it up to these tech guys to make their own rules, that is the exact same wrong approach. That's what I was getting to in my answer. We cannot allow them to be running. I'll give you just a simple example. We let Boeing build airplanes, but you don't get on that airplane until the FAA certifies it's safe to fly on it. We hope that Boeing does a good job building the planes. We hope that they create safety for our aircraft. But you still want some outside regulator, in this case the FAA to look at. This is not something that the states are able to do. One off. We're taking steps, but we've got to have an approach where the federal government worked with states, where we know how to effectively do this work to ensure that there's clarity across the board.

[C]

I believe that the technology companies absolutely want some regulations. I think they would resist that regulation.

[D]

They might, but that's where government has to step up and stand up to them. Let me give you one more example of that. Where states are leading, but where we really need a federal answer to this. More and more young people, teenagers, and I'm the father of four in that age cohort, about 30 to 35% of them report using these AI chat companions or AI chatbots to communicate with regularly. We have found increasingly real dangers associated with that. Pennsylvania just came along with first state to do this and sued Character AI, a company, because this AI chatbot was holding itself out as a licensed medical professional in Pennsylvania, which is against the law to do that in our commonwealth. If you're not really licensed and you're not really a medical professional, you're not really a person and you're not really a person. And they were dispensing behavioral health advice to young people, we're holding them accountable and they're going to change their behavior as a result of that. We need a federal approach to being able to do this in a way that protects our kids and protects all Americans from the dangers of AI. We can't simply rely on these tech companies to do it themselves. That's where I think we've got to have more robust regulation at the federal level.

[C]

The broader issue that this touches on is trust. And it is who do the American people trust, are looking out for them, their families, to help ensure that they're going to have opportunities in the future. And so much of the trust that the Americans have had, whether it's in the media or it's in corporate America or it's in their political officials, has. We've watched it. You and I have watched it deteriorate over the past decades. How does the United States best address that?

[D]

I can tell you how I try and address it. As a governor of a large state, I try and get stuff done for folks. And I know that may sound trite. Let me explain what I mean by that. I believe government can be a force for good in people's lives. What we have seen now increasingly over many years is the government is actually failing to address people's problems. Failing to fix your issue for your kid, or the broader issue, say of health care access and affordability. And both are important. The one off issue for that family and the broader issue in Pennsylvania, we've tried to solve these problems. This is going to sound silly to you, but it's important. We went from 48th in the country on permit speed to now being a national model on permit speed. When someone comes and wants to build a building and they know they've got to follow our strict regulations, but they can get it done quickly. That matters. They walk away having a positive experience with government. You walk into the DMV to get your driver's license renewed and you walk out of there 20 minutes later, not two hours later. You're probably not thinking a lot broadly about government and the cynicism and the distrust that exists. But you walk out having a good experience and maybe it cures a little bit of that distrust, a little bit of that cynicism, and puts us in a position where people can be a bit more hopeful, a bit more optimistic. Again, what am I getting at here? I think the blocking and tackling the government used to do well, they're no longer doing. And also solving big problems, bringing big change. That's not happening either. You look at the one big thing legislatively Donald Trump and his enablers in Congress did this year. They took health care away from millions of Americans to pay for a tax cut for the people at the very top. That's only not solving problems. That's eroding even more trust. That's breaking that compact with the American people and that's creating more cynicism in our system. So we're not dealing with the one off challenges well enough. We're not solving these big problems as an American government anymore. And the things that are happening are being done in a way that really hurts the middle class and hurts people who are struggling just to get by. And that is leading to a breakdown of trust. And then finally, of course, we have a President of the United States who can't tell the truth. We have a President of the United States who attacks Americans based on what they look like or where they come from, who they love, who they pray to or choose not to pray to. Every day, every day he's segmenting out certain parts of our population and attacking them. Whether it's people with disabilities or people who don't vote like him. That erodes trust. We've got to get back to having a commander in chief, a president of the United States that wants to lift up our entire country. Maybe we have differences of opinion on policy, but what we need to do is have someone who's there trying to lift everybody up. Instead, this guy's trying to tear down huge segments of the population with his chaos, with his corruption, with his cruelty every day.

[C]

So, Josh, you haven't said whether or not you're running, and I'm certainly not expecting you to make that announcement in Canada. But I do wonder if you were on the stage as the primary start. What's a slogan that the American people are going to hear?

[D]

Well, here's what I'll tell you. I'm running for reelection in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and I'm proud of the work that we've done, but I'm hungry to do a lot more. I'm proud that we've got the only growing economy in the Northeast. I'm proud that violent crime is down about 15%. I'm proud that we're seeing test scores go up and truancy rates drop because of our historic investments in public education. Good things are happening. We've got a lot more work. And I'm focused on running for reelection and serving the good people of Pennsylvania. And every day I go out, they know my motto is gsd. Get stuff done. Because I believe government can be a force for good in people's lives. You got to get stuff done, you got to deliver. And that's what I do every day in the Commonwealth.

[C]

Yeah, I thought it was God save democracy. So here you go. You got lots of ways you can play with that. Governor Josh Shapiro, thanks so much.

[D]

Great to be with you. Thank you. Thank you.

[A]

That's it for today's edition of the Gzero World podcast. Why not make it official? Why don't you rate and GZERO World 5 stars. Only 5 stars. Otherwise, don't do it on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Tell your friends.

[B]

We have a new podcast we think you'd like. It's called World's Toughest Job from Foreign Policy magazine and the United Nations Foundation. By the end of this year, The United Nations 193 member states will elect the organization's new Secretary General. Whoever wins the job will oversee a staff of tens of thousands of people around the world. They'll be expected to manage global crises, avert climate disaster, and end wars, all while answering to 193 different bosses. On World's Toughest Job, co hosts Jasmine Bayomi and former UN Deputy Secretary General Mark Malik Brown sit down with world leaders, thinkers and diplomats to explore what kind of leader the UN Needs right now. With the selection process for the next Secretary General already underway, the show is particularly timely and we recommend you check it out. You can find World's Toughest Job on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.