Loading summary
Rick Howard
You're listening to the Cyberwire Network powered by N2K. The word is Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures list, spelled C for common, V for vulnerabilities, and E for exposures. A public list sponsored by the US Government and designed to uniquely identify, without the need to manually cross reference, all the known software vulnerabilities in the world. Example sentence the very first CVE list, published in 1999, contained 321 vulnerabilities, chosen after careful deliberation and consideration of duplicates. Origin and context hold on to your butts Typical for any government or pseudo government organization like mitre, there are more acronyms involved in this story than you can throw a stick at. Hold on to your butts. Let's start with cbe. Mitre's David Mann and Steven Christie wrote the original white paper in January 1999 entitled Towards a Common Enumeration of Vulnerabilities. According to the tripwire website in 2020 back then, every software vendor had their own way of tracking vulnerabilities in their own products. Security professionals had no way to know if vendor A's vulnerability was the same as vendor B's or if they were two separate issues. Because there was no common language in the paper, Mann and Christie proposed creating a unified Vulnerability and exposures reference list that the entire community could use. The idea quickly gained traction. By 2002, the CVE list contained over 2,000 software vulnerabilities, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or nist, recommended that the US Government only use software that used CVE identifiers. Somewhere between then and now, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA within the Department of Homeland Security, became the official sponsor of the program. But CISA doesn't manage the program day to day. That is done by a cadre of international volunteers that form CVE numbering authorities or CNAs and are authorized to assign CVE IDs to vulnerabilities affecting products within their scope and can include submissions from researchers, vulnerability disclosures, and information technology vendors. By 2005, CISA also built the National Vulnerability Database, or NVD, designed to enrich the CVE list with risk and impact scoring using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System, or cvss, and provided other references like Patch Information, Affected Products, and Security Content Automation Protocol Mappings, or scap. A SCAP scanner compares a target computer or application's configuration and or patch level against the SCAP content baselines. Both CISA and NIST sponsor the nvd, and I think at the end of this, with all the acronyms. In this story, we came pretty close to covering all the letters in the English Alphabet. Nerd Reference in the debut podcast of we speak CVE In January 2021, Todd Beardsley of Rapid7, Tom Miller of CISA, Chris Levendas of the CVE program, and Dave Waltermeyer of NIST MVD discussed how their organizations and the community all work together to advance the CVE program's mission to identify, define, and catalog publicly disclosed cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Here's Chris explaining the origin of the CVE list.
Chris Levendas
The program mission for CVE is to identify and define publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. And so why is that important? It used to be the case, and in fact in some cases still is the case that you'd get two or more people talking about a cybersecurity vulnerability or two or more tools articulating scanning results, for example, from a network. And there was no way to know without doing a lot of manual work whether or not you were talking about the same vulnerability or different vulnerabilities. Back in 1999, Mitre, operationally was struggling with this problem and they invented the concept of cve, and the government liked that idea and asked us if we would be willing to share that with the world, and the program just took off from there. Back then we were producing maybe 150, 200, 300 vulnerabilities a year, and now we're getting closer to the 18 to 20,000 mark. And that number will continue to grow because cybersecurity vulnerabilities are hard to deliver. Right.
Rick Howard
Word Notes is written by Nyla Genoi, executive produced by Peter Kilpe, and edited by John Petrick and me, Rick Howard. The mix, sound, design, and original music have all been crafted by the ridiculously talented Elliot Peltzman. Thanks for listening.
Podcast Summary: Hacking Humans – "Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)"
Episode Details:
Introduction to CVE
In the January 7, 2025 episode of Hacking Humans, hosted by N2K Networks, Rick Howard embarks on an exploration of the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) system. This episode serves as a deep dive into how CVE functions as a critical tool in the cybersecurity landscape, helping professionals worldwide identify, track, and mitigate software vulnerabilities.
What is CVE?
Rick Howard opens the discussion by breaking down the acronym CVE:
“[00:02] ... The word is Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures list, spelled C for common, V for vulnerabilities, and E for exposures. A public list sponsored by the US Government and designed to uniquely identify, without the need to manually cross reference, all the known software vulnerabilities in the world.”
He emphasizes the importance of having a standardized nomenclature to streamline the identification and management of software vulnerabilities across different platforms and vendors.
Origins and Evolution of CVE
Howard traces the origins of CVE back to its inception in 1999. He highlights the collaborative efforts of Mitre's David Mann and Steven Christie, who authored the seminal white paper titled "Towards a Common Enumeration of Vulnerabilities." This paper laid the foundation for what would become the CVE list.
“[00:03] ... every software vendor had their own way of tracking vulnerabilities in their own products. Security professionals had no way to know if vendor A's vulnerability was the same as vendor B's or if they were two separate issues.”
Before CVE, the lack of a unified system made it exceedingly difficult for security professionals to ascertain whether different reports referred to the same underlying issue. The introduction of CVE addressed this gap by providing a common language for vulnerability identification.
Growth and Institutional Support
Howard outlines the rapid expansion of CVE following its establishment. By 2002, the list had grown to over 2,000 software vulnerabilities. This growth caught the attention of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which recommended that the US Government adopt CVE identifiers exclusively for its software.
Subsequently, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) within the Department of Homeland Security took over as the official sponsor of the CVE program. However, the day-to-day management remains in the hands of CVE Numbering Authorities (CNAs)—a group of international volunteers responsible for assigning CVE IDs to relevant vulnerabilities.
The National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
In 2005, CISA developed the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) to complement the CVE list. The NVD enriches CVE entries with additional data, such as:
Howard explains:
“[00:03] ... NVD was designed to enrich the CVE list with risk and impact scoring using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System, or cvss, and provided other references like Patch Information, Affected Products, and Security Content Automation Protocol Mappings, or scap.”
The integration of NVD with CVE significantly enhances the utility of the vulnerability data, allowing organizations to prioritize remediation efforts based on the severity and impact of each vulnerability.
Community Collaboration and Mission
A pivotal segment of the episode features insights from Chris Levendas of the CVE program. At [04:05], Chris delves into the mission and collaborative nature of CVE:
“[04:05] ... The program mission for CVE is to identify and define publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. And so why is that important?... there was no way to know without doing a lot of manual work whether or not you were talking about the same vulnerability or different vulnerabilities.”
He elaborates on the exponential growth of CVE entries, illustrating how the database has expanded from a few hundred vulnerabilities in its early years to approximately 18,000 to 20,000 by the time of recording. This surge reflects the escalating complexity and frequency of cybersecurity threats.
Chris also highlights the communal effort underpinning CVE’s success, involving contributions from researchers, vendors, and security professionals worldwide. This collective approach ensures that the CVE list remains comprehensive and up-to-date, providing a reliable resource for the global cybersecurity community.
Impact and Future Outlook
While the transcript concludes before the episode's end, the discussion underscores the indispensable role of CVE in modern cybersecurity frameworks. By standardizing vulnerability identification, CVE facilitates more effective communication, coordination, and response among stakeholders.
Rick Howard wraps up by acknowledging the extensive network of contributors and the ongoing commitment required to maintain and expand the CVE system. The episode effectively conveys the critical importance of CVE in safeguarding digital ecosystems against an ever-evolving array of cyber threats.
Notable Quotes:
Rick Howard at [00:02]:
"A public list sponsored by the US Government and designed to uniquely identify, without the need to manually cross reference, all the known software vulnerabilities in the world."
Chris Levendas at [04:05]:
"The program mission for CVE is to identify and define publicly disclosed vulnerabilities... there was no way to know without doing a lot of manual work whether or not you were talking about the same vulnerability or different vulnerabilities."
Conclusion
This episode of Hacking Humans offers a comprehensive overview of the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures system, highlighting its origins, evolution, and pivotal role in the cybersecurity domain. Through clear explanations and expert insights, listeners gain a deeper appreciation of how CVE serves as a cornerstone in the collective defense against cyber threats.
For cybersecurity professionals and enthusiasts alike, understanding CVE is essential for navigating the complex landscape of software vulnerabilities and orchestrating effective security strategies.
Credits: