
Frank Holland and the Investment Committee debate the tariff turnaround as stocks come off their lows after the White House pauses tariffs on Mexico for one month. Plus, Joe Terranova details his quarterly ETF rebalance. And later, Brian Sullivan joins us with the latest on the oil markets as tariffs loom. Investment Committee Disclosures
Loading summary
Edward Jones
What counts most to you? Maybe it's spending more time with the ones you love, or maybe doing more of what you love to do. The key to being rich is knowing what counts. At Edward Jones, our dedicated financial advisors are people you can count on for financial strategies to help support what truly matters to you. Let's find your rich Edward Jones. Member SIPC.
Discover
Are you still quoting 30 year old movies? Have you said cool beans in the past 90 days? Do you think Discover isn't widely accepted? If this sounds like you, you're stuck in the past. Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. And every time you make a purchase with your card, you automatically earn cash back. Welcome to the now it pays to Discover. Learn more@discover.com credit card based on the February 2024 NEL.
Scott Wapner
I'm Scott Wapner and you're listening to CNBC's Halftime Report, the podcast the most.
Discover
Profitable hour of the trading day.
Scott Wapner
We record this live weekdays at 12 Eastern.
Discover
Listen in.
Scott Wapner
Thank you, Carl and Sarah. Welcome to the Halftime Report. I am Frank Holland in for Scott Wapner. Front and center this hour, a tariff turnaround. Stocks coming well off their lows as the White House pauses tariffs on Mexico at least for one month. Tariffs on Canada and China are still set to take effect just after midnight. Our investment committee is standing by to break down the impact to the markets and to your money. Joining me for the hour, we have Joe Terranova, Steve Weiss and Jim Lebenthal. But first, I want to take a quick check of the markets. As we've been mentioning, they're off their lows of earlier. Right now looking at the dow down about 145 points, a third of a percent. The S and P down just over three quarters of 1%. The NASDAQ still the hardest hit, down one and one quarter of a percent. Also important to note, a lot of talk about tariffs potentially being inflationary. A lot of people expecting a reaction from the bond market. Looking at the benchmark, the 10 year holding pretty steady from the same levels that we've seen throughout the day of 4.51%. All right. With that, I think we've got to start here, Joe. I mean, what do you make of this as an investor? The fact that the president announces tariffs, Mexico says we're going to send troops to the southern border and they delay these tariffs for one month and then we see this reaction in the market. As an investor, how do you take this?
Joe Terranova
All right. So as it relates to how I think about tariffs first of all, it's clear that the announcement and potential implementation of tariffs is part of a negotiating strategy. I think that's very obvious to all of us. I think in other situations you could expect that tariffs will be implemented and they will be held in force for an extended period of time. How do you treat that as an investor? I feel like we're in the same place we were last week. You and I, Steve, were on the desk together last Monday. I feel like we're kind of in the same place. And I think the problem for investors is that this can be characterized as a macro condition that's affecting the price of risk assets. However, I think you're making a mistake if you make a macro call. I think you're making a mistake if you say, okay, this means you need to be bearish or no, no, no, no, this is a buy the dip, go all in. This is a great opportunity. I think in totality, it's a little bit of both. And I think it's about going bottoms up and saying, okay, 2025 is going to be a year where clearly we're going to have elevated volatility and probably going home. Long volatility on Fridays might be a good idea. We're going to have elevated volatility. And therefore I want to think about how do I generate alpha by going bottoms up, by trying to find areas of the market where I believe there'll be opportunity despite the volatility, and then to kind of look at other areas of the market and say, no, no, wait a second, that's susceptible to too much of the volatility rhetoric that we're receiving surrounding a lot of these negotiations. And I want to avoid it. So I just think the binary. I'm either bullish or I'm bearish. Take that, put it in the rearview mirror. It was 2024. And you know what? For the month of February, set your expectation. Okay, maybe we have a down month in February. I really don't know. I don't think most people know, but I wouldn't be surprised by it. And that's probably a little bit different than what we had in 2024.
Scott Wapner
All right, Suzanne, it's time for some bottom up stock analysis. A bit of a nuanced take. Steve Weiss, I'm going to come over to you. How do you view this rebound? And also, how do we even get to where we were? The president certainly telegraphed that he was going to put these tariffs in place. And still we saw the sell off today.
Steve Weiss
So there are a few things here. And we could look at tariffs as a one and done incident. We could say, oh, he's just negotiating. This is a guy who's never had success negotiating publicly like this. No, privately he did have five companies go belly up. So his negotiating skills just aren't that great for all their tend to be. And I'm not going to be somebody who minces on the political side, at.
Joe Terranova
Least on the president.
Steve Weiss
I'm not. I'm not. Definitely not Kamala Harris fan, definitely not Republican. So this is just looking as an investor, as a business person. This is chaotic. The first weeks of this administration have been like any other because of chaotic. It's also been like any other because of the incompetence not only of the president but the incompetence of many people he's put in. So I was on an earnings call. Large defense company on Friday. A large defense company critical to the safety of our country. Right. Both within our borders and external. They have no idea. They say some of the agencies are contracting, some aren't. It's basically the state of flux. And that's a measured outlook because nobody wants anything to offend the president. Otherwise you get kicked out of the press room or he sues you. And I'm actually thinking to work for the Trump administration first I'm going to say something bad about CNBC. I'm going to work for Trump itself for $25 million.
Scott Wapner
I want to get back to the market. Yeah, get back to what?
Steve Weiss
You have no idea. To just point. You have no idea what to do. Right. Like what's it good for? I don't know what tariffs are going to do. Look at it this way. We've got all these sycophants, admin saying that no bear them. Here are the profit margins. Hold it on gm.
Scott Wapner
Well, speaking of, let me run something by bank of America with a note today estimating that the tariffs could be as much of an 8% hit on EPS for the S&P 500 this year. So it sounds like what you're saying similar to what Joe was saying. Don't take a macro view. This is a very specific situation that's going to have some twists and turns. That bank of America, do you think that's just overblown to come out? Not first at.
Steve Weiss
So let me ask you, so if you've got GM that's got 8% EBITDA margins, right. That's their profitability, 8%. How can they tolerate 25% margins? And then if you retaliate to his retaliation they'll go higher. Do you think any company is going to lose money? Now? The reason why I think rates are off is because they're saying recession, they're not saying inflation. And that's scary. So you'll put a Fed in a situation that they're not used to being in, which is that you'll have inflation not driven by demand, by an opening economy. You'll have inflation that's driven by legislation. Right. So how do you lower rates in that? Then you'll have massive job cuts, because that's what this will do. You take a look at the others where the margins aren't that big so they can pass on the cost because nobody's going to produce goods to sell at a loss, you know.
Scott Wapner
So to your point, actually Ernst and Young, one of many shops out with some estimates on what tariffs to do to GDP. Their estimate GDP is going to have a negative impact of 1.5% this year due to tariffs. 2026, down 2.1%. So a lot of people are seeing it the way you're seeing it. Maybe not recession, but certainly a pullback in the economy.
Steve Weiss
But let me just finish. So what am I thinking of doing what I did? Nothing.
Scott Wapner
Today.
Steve Weiss
It's another day to do nothing because you don't know whether which way it's going to go. Look, I do think that they'll be put off, but what's going to be the next minefield? Is it going to be health care? We know it's going to be health care if Bobby Kennedy gets it.
Scott Wapner
See, now we're getting back to politics, though. We're getting back to politics. Just for a second, I want to.
Steve Weiss
Go to the very patient Frank. Well, just how you think about what.
Scott Wapner
His confirmation is politics.
Steve Weiss
No, I'm not talking about Bobby Kennedy getting. I'm talking about what's the next landmine? What are we going to do?
Scott Wapner
No, Understood. So, but whether or not the HH secretary that has a political ramification to.
Steve Weiss
It, I'm not sure.
Scott Wapner
I want to get to the very patient Jim Leventhal. Jim, your view, is this a do nothing day? Is this a day you want to sit on your hands and just see how things unfold? Or are there moves that you think you can make in light of the fact that maybe this is a negotiation negotiating tactic and we've already seen the markets kind of pare some of their losses?
Jim Lebenthal
Before I answer your question, I just want to distill this down to what I think is the core that matters. We all know there's Chaos out there, there's no question about it. You can just look at the back and the fourth on the tariffs. But underneath this you have a strong economy. All stop, period. Look at the ISM manufacturing, look at gdp, look at jobless claims. You have a strong economy that is highly likely to bowl through all of this chaos. You can see that in market indicators. You can look at the Vix right now at 18. That's high certainly, but that's in the normal operating band. That's not in some nosebleed territory. You can look at sectors of the market that you would think that would be really rallying not just today, but over the past few weeks. Things like Staples and utilities, they're up less than the market overall this year. So there's the fear signs in the market indicators just are not there. You can even look at just the returns overall on the market. S and p is up 2%, Dow is up about 4%. And that's, that's where I think the story lies. So yes, there's chaos, we're all going to agree on that. But underneath this is a strong economy that is allowing the rally to broaden. I suspect that it will continue. Will there be hesitation in corporate offices on the back of this chaos? Yes. But there is enough strength in this economy to continue. So now having said that, Frank, and trying to answer your question of what do you do, and this is I think very much similar to what Joe at least was saying. Steve, I know you're saying, just sit tight for a second. I think this is very much a stock pickers market. I agree with you Steve. And I did this two months ago selling gm. The math just simply doesn't work. If the tariffs are in place, it wipes out their profit. On the other hand, there are things that are up that you can sell. Today I'm selling on holdings. Kind of breaks my heart. You know, it's an international company, so who knows, it's a European based company. It may face tariffs in the not too distant future. And it's up 60% over the last, excuse me, 50% over the last six months. So that's a good opportunity to sell. Now last week I sold, or excuse me, I trimmed in video on an Oracle on the back of Deep seek, I've built a little cash. What do you do? Right now you sit on that. So in that regard, after having sold on today, this is a good time to have a little cash in your pocket and just see what unfolds. Not because I'm bearish on the markets overall, not because I'm bearish on the economy. I am neither of those. But I think this volatility or chaos, whatever you want to call it is going to dislocate individual stocks and you have to have some dry powder ready to buy low. The only way you can do that is by selling.
Steve Weiss
I don't disagree and I don't disagree the economy strong. I'm not worried about it today. I'm worried about it in a month, three months, six months, a year. But isn't about earning this net more.
Joe Terranova
Than it is the economy.
Steve Weiss
It's about. It's about guidance and earnings. I just told you a very large defense contractor wouldn't give guidance for 26. So because they can't, they don't know.
Scott Wapner
Speaking of defense, very quickly because we're going to get some moves in a second. Raymond James out with a note talking about safe harbor plays right now. Defense is one of them. Health care, utilities, financials, real estate. Agree with that general thesis that if you are going to make a move wise these are potentially safer plays to make in those areas.
Steve Weiss
Well it's not. It's not that easy defense. There are some defense contracts like Booz Allen Lightest which I do own after much respect for that company as I do for booze which I sold where Leidos 30% of their of their personnel, their headcount is embedded in the government. So we don't know what Doge is going to do exactly.
Jim Lebenthal
But right.
Scott Wapner
We do have.
Steve Weiss
Those are the issues. So it may not be a safe.
Scott Wapner
Harbor but we do want to move on when we get. We're kind of. Jim kind of alluded to his move in gm. Joe, you made a similar move. You actually sold with General Motors in the Terra terra Nova Momentum ETF looking at shares of GM right now down over 1%. Your view on GM, their tariff risk and also just the outlook for this company with this tariff uncertainty?
Joe Terranova
Well, when we took the position in GM I was skeptical to begin with. No harm no foul. October 31st we took the position at 5075. We're selling out Friday afternoon at 4946. Why are we selling out of it? Because you had a very sharp spike in the month of November above $60 and thereafter you saw price retreat. You could make the argument as to what the fundamental reasoning was behind it. I agree with Jimmy was probably more attributable to a lot of threats that were made at that time surrounding tariffs. That probably is why you saw the destruction in price. But overall it really was a collapse in momentum itself. And I think it's indicative just in terms of the industrial sector on the rebalance. Friday we saw for the very first time in several quarters that we began to reduce exposure to industrials.
Scott Wapner
All right. More broadly, a lot of companies actually have quite a bit of tariff exposure. Jim, I want to get some of your names that have a lot of tariff exposure, a lot of China risk, according to our note out earlier from Goldman, Qualcomm, Applied Materials, Wind Resorts and Nvidia, which you also mentioned that you trim some of it.
Jim Lebenthal
Yeah, well, so having already mentioned Nvidia, I mean Qualcomm and when. I don't think it's a surprise to anybody that there's some China exposure there, but there's different types of exposure. So Qualcomm obviously does sell a lot of chips to Chinese manufacturers, OEMs. That should not be a surprise to anyone, frankly. I think that's already priced into the multiple with Qualcomm, which will report Frank later this week. What you're really looking for there is not smartphone demand in China. If that's your investment thesis, forget it. The investment thesis has to be the broadening of the product pipeline into automotive, which is growing much faster than smartphones and Internet of Things, tablets, those sort of things, where edge computing for AI is the edge pun intended for Qualcomm. So I think just to summarize at this multiple, the China exposure is built in with when it's a little bit different because their exposure is not to China directly, it's to Macao. And to the extent that China is still trying to stimulate its economy, economy and they want to. You have seen better gross gaming revenues in Macao for several months now, actually over a year since they opened up the Chinese economy. And that is likely to continue. So that's not something where China is going to come in in the immediate sense and say, hey, we're turning off these concessions because they want gamblers to go there. They want to take their cut of the royalties that comes from Las Vegas Sands as well as Wind. So I don't, I don't see the exposure as being directly China related there.
Scott Wapner
All right, Joe, want to get some of the companies that you have either personally in your ETF that have some broad tariff exposure. Sww, Grainger, Fastenal, and then also some other names like a Qantas Services, KLA Corp, Qualcomm, Applied Materials, some similar names that to Jim, with some chip exposure as well. How are you viewing this?
Joe Terranova
Yeah, I mean, I think of it in terms of positioning and I think of it in terms of sentiment. And I'll go right towards Nvidia, which we discussed last week. One week ago I made the remark that if you were, if you were leveraged in your position, okay, then you should sell some and hope that that sale is a horrible sale because then the remainder of your position is actually working for you as the stock moves higher. I made that remark because I truly believe that positioning right now in Nvidia is extended. I think people are fully long the name. I myself, I am long in video. I think in video fundamentally continues to march higher. So I think you have to work that off a little bit. That's the one name I would speak towards because of positioning itself. Overall, I think when we're talking about a 10% tariff as it relates to China, I think we kind of got some good news in that regard because weren't we talking about 60% potential tariff on the campaign trail? Not so bad. On the ETF rebalance? On Friday we did continue to take down exposure towards semiconductors. Semiconductor exposure now is only at 4%. That was double digit territory one year ago.
Scott Wapner
Are you worried about the potential at least for retaliatory tariffs coming from China or some other actions that may not be explicitly tariffs but some other actions to impact US Companies over there, for example, Apple and Apple Intelligence. The government can certainly say we're going to hold off on giving you an AI partner and allow you to, to, to unveil or roll out this Apple Intelligence service in China or some other similar actions for other companies.
Joe Terranova
I think anyone's guessing unless they're inside the administration and really understand that. I do think when you think about negotiating leverage, I think President Trump's administration has far more negotiating leverage with Canada and Mexico than they do with China. I think they have to proceed cautiously in that regard.
Jim Lebenthal
I just want to point out one thing that I think mitigates the China exposure. Let's not forget that China knows that its economy is in bad shape. There's no question about it. They've been on a PR campaign for the last year to try to attract foreign direct investment. Now this is after many years of punishing foreign direct investment, not just economically, but also with criminal activity along the way, criminal accusations along the way. So they've got a long road to hoe to get out of that, out of that mess that, that they've self created. But it's clear that they want to, they're trying to do a PR campaign here to get more foreign direct investment. I don't think they can just easily slap on retaliatory tariffs unless they want to give up on that campaign.
Steve Weiss
Well, I think they should give up. That campaign failed. When a responsible CEO move their supply chain or open businesses, they're forgetting about sharing the intellectual your IP with them, which they say they've cut back on armed companies. They haven't. Apple saw this early. Others have seen it. Caterpillar saw it a while ago when they got defrauded buying company over there. Apple's moving their supply chain to India. The question is they can't move it quick enough. So. So I don't think you can rely on a dictatorship because that's what it is in China and putting resources there. They have the ultimate weapon, of course, which is rare earth.
Jim Lebenthal
So.
Steve Weiss
So they want to bring the global economy to grinding halt, which is why.
Jim Lebenthal
Trump wants Green, my MP for that.
Scott Wapner
You know, a lot of, a lot of people do talk about the rare earth and the fact, the rare earth and the fact they're in China. I've actually spoken to an auto executive, says for the most part US auto companies, they've been able to source it domestically. Now there's not as much risk. They have supply for two, maybe three years. And I understand you're saying long term that could be an issue. But we have increased. And Jim, you know, as a GM shareholder, I think you're.
Jim Lebenthal
Well, I'm no longer a GM shareholder but. But I'm a shareholder of MP Corporation, which produces rare earth or in Mountain Pass, California and refines it. It used to, several years ago, they used to just dig up the ore and send it to China for refinement. Now they're refining it themselves. They're also building magnets from that refined ore in Texas. So they're trying to get the rare earth element supply chain to be entirely domesticated. There's also Lynas, which is an Australian company. So this is a little bit weird trying, trying to do the same thing here in the US Both companies have grants from the US government to promote this. But there is a problem looming out there which has been for the last two years, China has been flooding the market because as much as we produce here and as much as we're building the supply chain, China does produce more. So whenever they want to, they just flood the market and drive down prices. That has not knocked either of these companies, Linus or MP out of business. Far from it. And they're about to, as I just said said, create an entirely Enclosed supply chain here. But what you really need Frank, is you need demand to remain strong. What you cannot afford is any recessionary or even in a sector like automotive, you cannot afford for automotive demand to go way down such that demand for rare earths goes down.
Steve Weiss
The point is that China is not a good trading partner for us now. And whether we can have rare earth, I dispute your two or three years of passengers.
Scott Wapner
That's what I'm hearing from an auto executive and he said that's pretty much in the US auto industry. They have enough supply for the next several years.
Steve Weiss
Okay, let's go.
Scott Wapner
We get on locked up.
Steve Weiss
Let's move off that.
Scott Wapner
We're going to.
Steve Weiss
The point is so many goods come from China. So Macy's Profit margins are 12%. You know, PVH profit margins are below that. So what happens, you know, they need their feedstock Lululemon profit margins 27% but they import a lot from Asia, particularly China. So you don't want to, you know, really. Well just it's good off.
Joe Terranova
It's a good thing that one week later though we're really not talking about deep Sea anymore.
Scott Wapner
Well actually we started talking.
Joe Terranova
Yeah, we're still thinking about it. But when you think about China, you think about commodities and commodity usage. And I have to point out that it's been gold more than anything else that really has been one of the stronger assets so far year to date. I think gold's up about 7, 7% year to date. And I just learned that to the viewers because I think in 2025 gold might be something that you're looking towards. I don't know if it's necessarily a buy and hold strategy, whatever your particular strategy might be, but it's clear that there is strong buying demand in the metals, gold and silver as well.
Scott Wapner
And that's also related to the trade war. China restarting its buying of gold for its central bank in December after a multi month pause partly to kind of hedge against the strong dollar. But again we are getting on several tangents. We do want to switch gears just a bit right now and turn our attention to tech. We just mentioned Apple. Apple shares down about 4% partly on tariff concerns, but more broadly as we talk about tech. Weiss, I'll come over to you when we're looking at tech right now and tariffs. How concerned are you about the broader space? Are there particular companies you're especially concerned about as you look at this market?
Steve Weiss
Well, Taiwan semi is a very large position for me, so I do have concerns. Not really. They've Got offices in China, but they don't really have their fabs there. They're actually building in the US 60 billion they're going to put to it. But I am concerned that we could have a blockade of Taiwan. Then what do you do? And it's war. Now. I don't think that's today's business, but those are concerns you have to have. So for companies that do have, that do rely on China for manufacturing, how can you not be concerned about it? So for me, it just points out how valuable a company Taiwan Semi is and why Taiwan Semi should not be down at all. Today was really down because the indices. So now in video, I've got concerns about video. It's been a small position as opposed to Taiwan Semi. And look, Moore's Law, as I said on Wednesday, it's going to happen here like sapped everywhere else. The question is, will it bounce from here? I sort of think it will because there's so much about deep seat we don't know. I wouldn't buy more here, though.
Scott Wapner
But I don't, I don't want to skip Apple. Jim, you're only person that owns Apple here, concerned all about Apple being down 4%. I see a Bank of America note saying tariff concerns are overblown. They don't think it's a meaningful impact to earnings. Yet we're seeing this stock down just about 4%.
Jim Lebenthal
I own it at less than half the market weight. Now. That means I'm bearish on it, but why would I be bullish on it all? Why would I hold it at all? I will tell you that my perspective as somebody who advises retail clients, I can tell you that the retail demand for this stock remains extraordinarily strong. Frank, you weren't on. Scott was on about three weeks ago when I trimmed it. And at that time I said on air that I might actually get rid of it. The rest of the afternoon I was fielding calls from clients and advisors at my firm saying, don't you dare. One of them said, you'll pry my Apple shares from my cold, dead hands. I thought I was going to get a call from my CEO. I really did. It was that there is, there is a love for Apple combined with its share buybacks, combined with its presence in passive ETFs, that mandates that it's probably not going to fall out of bed. That said, if you're, you know, the reason that it had a good response, kind of good response to last week's earnings was on the perception that China demand wasn't as bad as fear. If your investment thesis is China demand on Apple, forget it. You got the wrong investment thesis. It has to be what I said just a minute ago.
Joe Terranova
The slowdown in revenue is the reason why it is not in the ET etf. And again this past quarter, I don't know, I didn't think the revenue was exactly exciting. Certainly when you measure it relative to the other Mag 7. We had a very similar circumstance last year during this quarter where it appeared as though you were getting the uptick in revenue growth and then the quarter was reported and you saw that downtick once again. I just wonder if in fact that's what's happening here because this quarter relative, relative to the last indicates that that possibly is occurring where you're seeing a deceleration in revenue growth and.
Jim Lebenthal
No, no super cycle upgrade, which was the thesis at the Worldwide Developer Conference back in June.
Steve Weiss
Yeah, it was my thesis. I bought into the. Into the upgrade till I saw there's the emperor has no clothes. So.
Scott Wapner
Well, speaking of Mag 7 earnings, Joe, you're actually making a move. You are buying Alphabet, you're selling Microsoft.
Joe Terranova
Yeah, and again, it's. It's not in particular a Paris trade or, or something in tandem, but I think it's just an acknowledgment. Look, it's a momentum strategy. Everything begins with momentum. You could criticize that if you want, but price is really what is driving. It's the foundation for a lot of the decisions. And when you measure price, Microsoft over the last 12 months, you're really talking about a company that has gone nowhere. I think Microsoft over the last 12 months is maybe up a little bit more than 1%. I know of the last six months it's up 4%. Conversely, when you're looking at Alphabet, you'll see that Alphabet over the last 52 weeks is up about 41% and over the last six months it's up 27%. It's a really. It's just an acknowledgment of price, a reflection of strong price, reflection of confidence represented in technicals. And that's why the strategy went out of Microsoft and into Alphabet. Now currently in terms of the Mag 7, there's ownership of Tesla, Alphabet, Nvidia and Amazon.
Scott Wapner
Only because you mentioned it. You're not worried about any deep sea risk in this earnings report, the call, what analysts might have to ask about their cloud infrastructure, business and demand going forward, anything like that.
Joe Terranova
So personally I'm concerned. Personally I'm concerned about your fundamental headwinds as you present them for both Microsoft and for Alphabet. I'm concerned that Alphabet is going to, their search is going to be cannibalized by the introduction of generative AI. But again, a rules based strategy. It's not incorporating that, it's incorporating the rules. And the rules are looking at, okay, what is price doing and then what's the reflection on your balance sheet, your revenue growth?
Scott Wapner
All right, speaking of Mag 7, let's now turn to Amazon. Could that big tech company be the best position to weather this tariff storm? Our Kate Rooney is following that story for us. Kate.
Kate Rooney
Hey there, Frank. Yeah, so tariffs are expected to be negative for Amazon, but some investors, investors are pointing out the bigger hit to Amazon's foreign low cost competitors. Think of Shein and Temu, which could be a silver lining for the e commerce giant. So a bulk of items available on Amazon do come from China through third party sellers. Rohit Kulkarni over at Roth estimates 30 to 40% of those Amazon sellers import from China and then about 60%, you step back for a second of all of the items sold on Amazon are from those third party sellers. So they may actually be the ones absorbing some of the cost increases. Mexican tariffs, as you know, are on hold at the moment, but that region makes up less than 10% of Amazon's seller base. The silver lining I mentioned, tariffs are really taking a name at a trade loophole that has boosted Amazon's Chinese competitors. They have undercut on price and a loophole allows exporters at this point to ship packages worth, worth less than $800 into the US without any sort of levies. And that is going to be going away. As bank of America put it, growth at Sheehan and Temu could be, quote, significantly constrained by that. Although TD Cowan, a note just out says they think much of this is going to be reversed. As they put it, Trump has some other goals with China that might lead him to undo the de minimis moves if China gives him enough on fentanyl. Dan Ives, though over at Wedbush thinks this dynamic, the competitive dynamic makes tariffs a net positive for Amazon earnings coming up on Thursday of this week. So expect a ton of questions on the levers that Amazon has to pull and then questions on margins as well. Frank, back over to you.
Scott Wapner
All right, Kate Rooney, Kate Rooney, thank you very much. Our Kate Rooney out in the bay. Joe, Jim, you guys both Amazon, quick, quick comment. Concerns about tariffs when it comes to Amazon and the fact that that de minimis provision has been taken away. Do you think that it might actually be A tailwind for the company.
Jim Lebenthal
I'm not, I don't own Amazon on the basis of the tariffs or trade wars. I think this is one where you just keep it simple. Saylor, we know what this, you know, the Etail is. We know about Amazon website services. You have to respect the price momentum in this name. And anybody who says it's expensive at 38 times has to look at the history of outperforming on earnings and the fact that they do a lot of R and D, it's a lot cheaper than 38.
Steve Weiss
This is just a low conviction quarter for me and I own it too. It's a decent sized position. But you know, with the cloud they've keep in mind they had to buy tools, AI tools from Microsoft. So I just don't know how it's.
Joe Terranova
Going to diversified the model phenomenally well. They've accelerated the revenue growth. Pushing, pushing back against Amazon shares up.
Scott Wapner
About a half percent. These guys are excited about Amazon.
Joe Terranova
Are we done?
Scott Wapner
Yeah, we're done with Amazon. We got to move on. All right, coming up next, tariffs in the energy trade. We're breaking down the impact on the oil and the gas stocks. Plus we have more committee moves in that space. More halftime coming up right after this.
Edward Jones
Our state has changed a lot in the last 140 years. We know because Multicare has been here guided by a single making our communities healthier. That comes from making courageous decisions, partnering.
Discover
With local communities to grow programs and.
Edward Jones
Services and expanding healthcare access to those.
Discover
Who need it most.
Edward Jones
Together, we're building a healthier future.
Discover
Learn more@mycare.org and now a next level moment from ATT Business. Say you've sent out a gigantic shipment of pillows and they need to be there in time for International Sleep day. You've got AT and T5G so you're fully confident, but the vendor isn't responding. And International Sleep Day is tomorrow. Luckily, AT&T 5G lets you deal with any issues with ease. So the pillows will get delivered and everyone can sleep soundly, especially you. AT&T 5G requires a compatible plan and device coverage not available everywhere. Learn more@att.com 5G Network Are you still quoting 30 year old movies? Have you said cool beans in the past 90 days? Do you think Discover isn't widely accepted? If this sounds like you, you're stuck in the past. Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. And every time you make a purchase with your card, you automatically earn cash back. Welcome to the Now. It pays to Discover. Learn more@discover.com credit card based on the February 2024 Nelson Report.
Edward Jones
We are back on Halftime Report. I'm Silvana. And now with your CNBC News update. In the wake of President Trump's executive order to impose tariffs on goods from Canada, Ontario's premier Doug Ford said his government is ending its $68 million contract with Elon Musk's satellite company Starlink. In a statement, Ford said Ontario will also ban U.S. companies from provincial contracts until Trump removes the tariffs. Jury selection is set to begin today in the trial of the alleged ringleader of a $250 million pandemic fraud scheme in Minnesota. The founder of Feeding Our Future, Amy Bach, is part of a second group to stand trial. The first trial received attention nationwide after some defendants tried to unsuccessfully bribe a juror. Bach says she is innocent of the charges. And the Beatles won their eighth Grammy award last night thanks to what else? Artificial intelligence. The 2023 track now and then used machine learning technology developed by filmmaker Peter Jackson's sound team to clean up a demo John Lennon recorded in the late 1970s and piece together later contributions from Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr and George Harrison. Scott, I'll send it back to you.
Scott Wapner
Very cool Savannah. Thank you very much. Our Savannah now back at CNBC hq turning out to the energy trade. Oil coming off session highs as the White House agrees to a one month delay in Mexico tariffs. Our Brian Sullivan is following the at the impact on the energy space. Brian.
Brian Sullivan
Well, Frank, it did look like it was going to be a hard day's night for the energy stocks, but that has not been the case in fact. And Joe terranova, I know Mr. Oil might be able to go a little deeper into this, but here's what's happening. We're seeing oil stocks mostly higher. The XLE, the XLP, these major ETFs, they're actually up some of the stocks. I think guys that might be the most exposed to Canadian tariffs because remember Mexico delayed by a month. We're still dealing with Canada. We import 62% of our imported oil comes from Canada. Those tariffs, 10% are still on. Some of the names most impacted should be Marathon Petroleum npc. They've got three or four refineries that ingest Canadian crude. Guess what? That stock is higher. Valero, their CEO on a conference call last week saying, well, 25% tariffs would cut our throughput, meaning refining rates. These are 10% so they should have some impact. Guess what? That stock is also higher. Valero, Marathon Petroleum, Exxon, Phillips 66. They're on this list, guys, because they buy Canadian oil. They're not the only buyers, and that is not all the oil that they buy. But if we're talking about tariffs, I think we can all agree that, like a bad movie, what matters is how long it lasts. Right? You can sit through something for a short period of time, but if it's three hours long, you might get up and leave. And I think with tariffs. I talked spent yesterday talking to market participants, CEOs, companies, etc. And all I heard was this. The longer the tariffs go on, the more risk there is right now. And Joe knows this. There is plenty of oil. But if these tariffs go on for a couple of days, couple weeks, couple months, whatever, we could see Canada divert some of that oil. And that's where I think Joe would agree. You get the risk, which is this. If Canada does. Guys, quote the nuclear option. If you're on the radio, I'm doing the air quote thing, and starts diverting the oil they sell to us to, say, India or China, then those names and a few others that I just showed might have real risk because they need the Canadian oil to process. Otherwise, they have nothing to sell. Right now. They're fine.
Scott Wapner
All right, our Brian Sullivan with a look at the energy trade. I mean, Joe, he's talking a lot to you, so I guess we got to start with you. I want to talk about some of your energy ownership. Diamondback, ExxonMobil, Baker Hughes. Among the names that you own. You your view of the fact that right now we're seeing oil move higher. By the way, BNP Paribas saying that tariffs are. It's mildly bullish for wti.
Joe Terranova
Well, first of all, these are new positions. In fact, coming into this quarterly rebalance, we held a zero allocation towards energy.
Steve Weiss
So in which is remarkably different from a year ago, right?
Scott Wapner
From.
Joe Terranova
Yeah, a little bit longer than a year ago. Yeah. We began to scale down in 2023. The energy exposure throughout 2024 reached a point where we had no energy exposure. But now building it back up once again. Look, I look at all of this as kind of a reallocation in terms of where production ultimately comes from. Brian made very thoughtful remark regarding where we are in terms of production. And production is present, it's there. It certainly can be increased domestically if we so choose. I think Texas can make up a lot of that production lost as it relates to redirecting a lot of Canadian oil elsewhere. Probably a little expensive. You know, I think the preference is for that oil to come south here. Into the US not to be redirected overseas to India and other places.
Scott Wapner
Yeah. By the way, natural gas up double digits. You also own equity, largest natural gas producer in the US So good day for you there. Coming up next on halftime, much more on the trade war in your portfolio. Our Courtney Reagan is standing by with the inflation fighting ETFs in today's ETF Edge. Halftime. Back right after this.
Discover
And now a next level moment from ATT Business. Say you've sent out a gigantic shipment of pillows and they need to be there in time for International Sleep day. You've got AT and T5G so you're fully confident, but the vendor isn't responding. And International Sleep Day is tomorrow. Luckily, AT&T 5G lets you deal with any issues with ease. So the pillows will get delivered and everyone can sleep soundly, especially you. ATT 5G requires a compatible plan and device coverage not available everywhere. Learn more@att.com 5G Network Are you still quoting 30 year old movies? Have you said cool beans in the past 90 days? Do you think Discover isn't widely accepted? If this sounds like you, you're stuck in the past. Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. And every time you make a purchase with your card, you automatically earn cash back. Welcome to the Now It Pays to Discover. Learn more at discover.com credit card based on the February 2024 Nelson Report.
Scott Wapner
And we are back on Halftime. Listen to our Courtney Reagan with today's ETF Edge.
Edward Jones
Hi there, Frank. So whether implemented now or later, one of the major arguments against tariffs is that they can spur inflation. Our next guest believes too many investors think inflation is in the rearview mirror, but that they should still consider it a very real and possibly building headwind right now. So joining us is John Davy. He's CIO at Astoria Portfolio Advisors. John, thanks for being with us. I mean, look, as we mentioned, you say most investors portfolios are not currently prepared for higher inflation.
John Davy
Yeah. I mean a lot of the portfolios that we oversee and we see in the marketplace is still very much tech and growth and have very little exposure to real assets, sectors like energy, materials, industrials, sectors that benefit from higher inflation. So we don't think people are prepared for an extended period of tariffs, which tariffs are inflationary by nature. So we don't think people are prepared for it.
Edward Jones
And here we are. What a day to have you on here. I mean, obviously you're going to talk your book because you run an inflation adjusted fund. So how does it Work. Tell us about it.
Discover
Yeah.
John Davy
Well, the funny thing is we launched this fund in December 2021 and people thought that, you know, inflation was not going to be around. And since then, if you look at core PCE, you know, we're still at 2.6. The Fed's target is 2%. Once inflation, Jeannie, comes out of the bottle, you know, it's very difficult to put it back in. And if you were to extend your chart and your screen back to 2021, you'll see that cumulatively the spread between PPI, our fund versus S and P for most of the period, we actually were outperforming the S and P. But that closed with the Mag 7 run up. So what we do is we allocate across 50 different stocks and or ETFs that benefit from structurally higher inflation. So that's oil and gas, parts of energy, industrial materials. We also added recently data centers, power plays. So in aggregate, it's a 13 P E ratio, which I think is pretty cheap. And we're picking, you know, the best in breed stocks, ones that are higher quality within those sectors.
Edward Jones
Okay, so, so outside of that, I mean, how else are you advising clients to diversify, spread risk around in their portfolios for everything that we're having to manage right now?
John Davy
Well, we're global macro investors. We don't love buying the S and P or the qs. Let's say we think you should be tilted away. The Mag 7 stocks are very, very expensive. If you look, earnings growth for the MAG7 stocks is projected to be 20% by the end of this year. The S&P493 is projected to be 12%. So that spread of 8%, that's narrowed significantly. Last year that spread was like 33%. So we think you should be buying, you know, very idiosyncratic stories. Whether it's things like ppi, which are inflation beneficiaries or kbwb, the money center banks. We're even tilting towards equal weighted strategies.
Edward Jones
Okay, some good ideas here on a day where inflation and tariff is all the talk of the town. Thank you very much. Much more on inflation fighting tactics and quick diversification coming up on ETF Edge. That's at 1:00pm Eastern, John. We'll be joined by Todd Rosenbluth. He's head of research at Verify, ETF edge.cnbc.com Frank, back over to you.
Scott Wapner
All right, Courtney, thank you very much. Courtney Reagan with today's ETF Edge. Coming up, more committee moves. Joe has two new cells, including a name that Weiss is in. We'll debate the move coming up next. And welcome back to halftime. We want to highlight a few other trades in the Terra Nova Quality Momentum etf. Joe, coming over to you. Yes, Old Caterpillar.
Joe Terranova
Yes. And you do that when revenue growth goes from double digits to negative. So the strategy is constantly looking at what is the revenue growth. When thinking about the quality factor we prioritize that which is kind of different. And I think that absolves you of then getting into a lot of value traps when you look at that revenue growth. And the revenue growth for Caterpillar has gone the wrong way.
Scott Wapner
So what do you make the upgrade today? Upgrade today price Target raised from 355 up to 385 by UBS. Also moved up to neutral. Important to note Caterpillar has a very big presence in Mexico, a number of facilities there.
Joe Terranova
It sounds like you're kind of challenging the fact that we got out of the position, throwing in an upgrade and saying maybe they're right and possibly you're wrong. I believe in following a rules based strategy, removing the human emotion. So I'm going to align myself with what this.
Steve Weiss
He was channeling there.
Joe Terranova
I did.
Steve Weiss
You did?
Scott Wapner
Jim, you're a Caterpillar investor. I knew he was going to do that.
Joe Terranova
Look, people are saying that this is a black jacket. It's the same color as yours. It's navy blue, baby blue. It's not black.
Scott Wapner
Jim, just tag us out. We're going, we're going to get going on this. Anything on Caterpillar? I know you owned it way back in the day, but very quick.
Jim Lebenthal
It's a great company. I think that after the run it's had and at the valuation that it's had and all the success that the industrial sector has had, it's fine to trim it or even sell it. There's nothing wrong with selling high. Nothing at all.
Scott Wapner
What about industrials overall? I mean if we are in fact in a trade war and tariffs, you know, we don't have that much clarity. We just saw kind of a reversal today.
Jim Lebenthal
It makes this simple too. I'm going to make this simple. To look, in the long run industrials should work, right? We've got infrastructure spending, we've got supply chain on shoring. With all the trade wars going on, that's going to continue. In the short term the sector is due for consolidation. So just brace yourself for that, all right?
Scott Wapner
Brace yourself. We're going to get to another move. Joe, you also sold Uber price momentum.
Joe Terranova
That's the reason behind it you had a run up above 80 in the fall as it began to pull back and correct from that level. Personally, I sold out of the position at I believe 73.5. We talked about it on air. I think the company is well positioned when you think about the future. But I think you're going to have to endure a period in which you're going to have to wait. If you're long the position and you want to be patient, you will be rewarded. For those that own Uber, I would think that the next $25 is going to be higher, not $25 lower. But this is a strategy that's rather active. It rebalances and reconstitutes on a quarterly basis. I like that effect and what it did was it acknowledged that we're basically seeing Uber is running in place. By the way, when you rebalance and reconstitute on a quarterly basis, you have the advantage of paring back winning positions like Applovin, like Palantir. And that's exactly what happened on Friday.
Scott Wapner
Right now looking at Uber shares up just about one and a half percent. All right, coming up next, Mike Santoli joins us with his midday word. We're back right after this. And we're back on halftime. Senior markets commentator Mike Santoli joins us now with his midday work. Hey, Mike.
Mike Santoli
Yeah, hey, Frank. You know, I guess you could in the abstract step back and say we could be down three quarters of 1% on Monday for no reason at all or any reason. And of course it does come down to the market trading in the very short term in this binary way. Either it's going to be maximum tariffs or not. And we have to be headline aware. What is interesting as some of the dust has settled so far today is what is still weighing on The S&P 500 is the China basket.
Discover
Right.
Mike Santoli
So it's in video, Apple and Tesla is the source of most of the downside. That's the way we're going to trade it in the short term. I don't think it's the make or break factor for the US economy but it is in investors minds the thing that complicates their fundamental premise for why they in general, on balance, the majority wanted to lean bullish this year. So very interested in how the retail trading cohort responds to all this. And I noticed my little tells of retail activity had nosed into the green that would be Robinhood shares and Palantir just a little earlier. So there's a willingness to believe on that front.
Scott Wapner
We're going to talk Palantir, in just a second, I want to talk to you about bonds and the so called bond vigilantes. Where are they? I mean, we got the tariff announcement looking at bond yields are actually down basis points from a week ago.
Mike Santoli
Well, first of all, you got the stock vigilantes on tariffs and that was a percent and a half down on the S&P 500. Maybe that got some response. Where it is is I think the long end of the bond market was essentially pricing in at least higher risk of economic disruption or slowdown risk. I mean, these are small moves. This is not tremendous, but it's not across the board an organic inflationary event, even if you do get the tariffs. And I don't think that bonds would necessarily respond as a if they were.
Scott Wapner
All right, Mike Santoli with his midday word. Mike, thank you very much. Stay with us. We have final trades coming up on halftime. And we're back on halftime with final trades. Jim, you're up first.
Jim Lebenthal
Cisco Systems. I know I've talked about this a lot, but you just have to respect the price action here. They've had several quarters in a row of better than expected earnings and guidance. I think that continues in a couple of weeks from now.
Steve Weiss
Weiss UnitedHealthcare. In fairness, Jim wanted to be his final trade too, but, but allowed me to take it. Talk about price action. It's great. It's defensive and I think the stock goes past the old highs.
Scott Wapner
Joe in the navy jacket.
Joe Terranova
So going back to where we began the show talking about don't focus on the macro. Are you bullish? Are you bearish? Walmart trading to a new all time high. Tell me, Frank, does Walmart benefit from a bullish environment? A bearish environment? Which environment? Or a hybrid of all.
Scott Wapner
There we go, final trades. That's going to do it for halftime. Take a look at the markets still in the red. Have a great day. The exchange starts right now. You've been listening to CNBC's Halftime Report, the podcast you can always catch us.
Discover
Live weekdays at 12 Eastern only on CNBC.
Edward Jones
All opinions expressed by the Halftime Report participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBCUniversal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, Internet or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the halftime Report participants consider reliable. But neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Halftime Report disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com halftime reportdisclaimer Learn how.
Discover
To use AI to be more successful with CNBC Make it's new online course.
Scott Wapner
We'll give you examples that can help.
Kate Rooney
You master AI tools.
Discover
Go to CNBCmakeit.com AI and register now.
Halftime Report: A Tariff Turnaround (February 3, 2025)
Host: CNBC’s Scott Wapner
Release Date: February 3, 2025
Introduction
In the February 3, 2025 episode of CNBC's Halftime Report, host Scott Wapner delves into the latest developments in trade policies and their immediate impacts on the financial markets. With a focus on the White House's decision to pause tariffs on Mexico for one month while maintaining those on Canada and China, the episode features insightful commentary from top investors Joe Terranova, Steve Weiss, and Jim Lebenthal. The discussion navigates through market reactions, sector-specific implications, and strategic investment considerations in the face of evolving trade tensions.
Market Overview
Scott Wapner opens the session with a brief overview of the current market standings:
"The stocks are coming well off their lows as the White House pauses tariffs on Mexico at least for one month." [01:14]
Tariffs Discussion
The core of the episode centers on the White House’s strategic move to halt tariffs on Mexico temporarily. Panelist Joe Terranova emphasizes viewing tariffs as part of a broader negotiating strategy rather than as isolated macroeconomic factors.
"Tariffs are part of a negotiating strategy. Don’t make a macro call; instead, look for bottoms up opportunities in the market." [02:25]
Terranova advises investors to adopt a nuanced approach, suggesting that 2025 will be characterized by heightened volatility. He recommends focusing on areas with inherent opportunities despite the turmoil, advocating for an active, selective investment strategy rather than a strictly bullish or bearish stance.
Sector Analyses
1. Technology Sector
The technology sector is under scrutiny, particularly companies with significant exposure to China. Panelist Jim Lebenthal points out the resilience of the tech sector underpinned by strong economic indicators like ISM manufacturing data and low unemployment rates.
"Underneath the chaos is a strong economy that is likely to sustain the rally." [08:29]
Specific companies discussed include:
Apple: Despite a 4% drop attributed to tariff fears, leaders like Jim Lebenthal remain cautiously optimistic, highlighting strong retail demand and share buybacks as stabilizing factors.
"My perspective as an advisor is that retail demand for Apple remains extraordinarily strong." [22:39]
Amazon: Analyst Kate Rooney discusses how removing the de minimis provision for tariffs could benefit Amazon by constraining cheaper Chinese competitors like Shein and Temu.
"Growth at Shein and Temu could be significantly constrained, benefiting Amazon." [26:17]
2. Defense Sector
The defense sector remains a focal point, with companies like Marathon Petroleum and Valero showing resilience despite existing tariffs on Canadian oil. Jim Lebenthal underscores the importance of a robust economy supporting the sector.
"There is a strong economy allowing the rally to broaden across sectors like defense." [07:37]
3. Energy Sector
Energy stocks responded positively despite tariff uncertainties. Panelist Brian Sullivan elaborates on how companies like ExxonMobil and Valero are navigating the 10% tariffs on Canadian oil, with the consensus that the short-term impact is manageable.
"Oil stocks are mostly higher despite ongoing tariffs on Canadian imports." [32:20]
Specific Stock Discussions
General Motors (GM)
Joe Terranova discusses the decision to sell GM shares amid tariff uncertainties, highlighting the stock's recent volatility and diminished momentum.
"We’re selling out of GM because the momentum has collapsed, reflecting tariff-related fears." [12:11]
Qualcomm and Nvidia
Jim Lebenthal addresses chip manufacturers' exposure to China, noting that Qualcomm's diversified product pipeline and Nvidia’s strong positioning in AI reduce direct tariff impacts.
"Qualcomm’s exposure is built into their pipeline, focusing on automotive and AI rather than just smartphones." [13:17]
Caterpillar
The panel debates Caterpillar's prospects amid tariff concerns. While Steve Weiss is skeptical about the company’s future under prolonged tariffs, Jim Lebenthal appreciates Caterpillar's strong fundamentals but acknowledges short-term consolidation risks.
"Caterpillar is a great company, and selling high is nothing wrong with." [41:56]
Uber
Joe Terranova explains selling Uber shares due to stagnating momentum, despite the company's strong long-term positioning.
"Uber is running in place, and selling now positions us to buy low later." [42:34]
Inflation and Portfolio Strategies
John Davy, CIO at Astoria Portfolio Advisors, joins the discussion to emphasize the persistent threat of inflation exacerbated by tariffs. He critiques the prevalent tech-heavy portfolios for lacking exposure to inflation-resistant sectors like energy and materials.
"Most portfolios are tech and growth-focused with little exposure to sectors that benefit from higher inflation." [37:41]
Davy advocates for diversified investments across 50 different stocks and ETFs that inherently benefit from structurally higher inflation, such as oil and gas, industrials, and real assets.
"Our strategy allocates across sectors that benefit from higher inflation, maintaining a competitive PE ratio of 13." [38:15]
Final Trades and Analyst Opinions
In the concluding segment, panelists discuss recent trades and investment strategies:
Cisco Systems: Jim Lebenthal praises Cisco for its consistent earnings and growth prospects, suggesting it as a strong holding.
"Cisco has had several quarters of better-than-expected earnings and continues to show strong potential." [45:50]
UnitedHealthcare: Steve Weiss highlights its defensive nature and promising price action, viewing it as a solid investment.
"UnitedHealthcare is defensive and its price action is strong, making it a worthwhile holding." [46:12]
Walmart: Joe Terranova reflects on Walmart’s robust performance, questioning whether it thrives in both bullish and bearish environments.
"Walmart's new all-time high raises questions about benefiting in various market conditions." [46:31]
Conclusion
The episode of Halftime Report effectively navigates the complex landscape of current trade policies and their multifaceted impacts on the stock market. The panel collectively underscores the importance of a strategic, informed approach to investing amidst tariff-induced volatility. By focusing on sector resilience, specific stock potentials, and inflation-resistant strategies, investors are equipped with actionable insights to navigate the evolving economic terrain.
Notable Quotes
Joe Terranova: "Tariffs are part of a negotiating strategy. Don’t make a macro call; instead, look for bottoms up opportunities in the market." [02:25]
Jim Lebenthal: "Underneath the chaos is a strong economy that is likely to sustain the rally." [08:29]
John Davy: "Most portfolios are tech and growth-focused with little exposure to sectors that benefit from higher inflation." [37:41]
Steve Weiss: "UnitedHealthcare is defensive and its price action is strong, making it a worthwhile holding." [46:12]
This comprehensive summary encapsulates the essential discussions, strategic insights, and expert opinions presented in the Halftime Report episode titled "A Tariff Turnaround." It serves as a valuable resource for investors and market enthusiasts seeking to understand the implications of current trade policies on various market sectors and investment strategies.