← Hard Fork
Hard Fork
Character.AI’s Teen Chatbot Crackdown + Elon Musk Groks Wikipedia + 48 Hours Without A.I.
01:00:38
“We are living through a dramatic contraction in the access that teenagers have to technology online.”
Loading summary
Transcript200 lines
- [00:00]
Kevin Roose
Don't just imagine a better future. Start investing in one with betterment. Whether it's saving for today or building wealth for tomorrow. We help people in small businesses put their money to work. We automate to make savings simpler. We optimize to make investing smarter. We build innovative technology backed by financial experts. For anyone who's ever said, I think I can do better, so be invested in yourself. Be invested in your business. Be invested in better with betterment. Get started at betterment. Com. Investing involves risk performance not guaranteed.
- [00:33]
Casey Newton
Well, I wonder if you saw this. You know, I. I keep very close tabs on celebrity news, Kevin.
- [00:37]
Kevin Roose
I know you do.
- [00:38]
Casey Newton
And in particular, I'm always interested. Has any Hard Fork guest sort of entered the world of celebrity? Because that's always very exciting for me.
- [00:45]
Kevin Roose
It is.
- [00:46]
Casey Newton
And this week, it was officially confirmed that Katy Perry the pop star is dating one time hard for guest and former Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau.
- [00:58]
Kevin Roose
I was wondering where you were going with that. I'm not sure. I put hard for guest on Justin Trudeau's at the top of his resume.
- [01:04]
Casey Newton
To my parents, that is the main way that Justin Trudeau is known is as a. As a hard forecast.
- [01:09]
Kevin Roose
And that was Katy Perry's boyfriend?
- [01:11]
Casey Newton
Yes. He came in like a dark horse, and now they're dating. And for all I know, she's living a teenage dream right now with the former Prime Minister of Canada.
- [01:19]
Kevin Roose
Hey, she's not a teenager.
- [01:21]
Casey Newton
No. Have you listened to the song? Do you know what the song Teenage Dream is about? It's about falling in love with someone that makes you feel like it's a teenage dream. Oh, my God.
- [01:30]
Kevin Roose
And let this be a lesson to other newsmakers. Celebrities, if you come on the hard Fork podcast 12 to 18 months later, you may find yourself dating a celebrity.
- [01:41]
Casey Newton
For all we know, that is how Katy Perry became aware of Justin Trudeau. She was. She was watching over@YouTube.com hardfork and she saw this man talking about Canada and she said, baby, you're a firework. I'm gonna be honest. I've run out of the song titles for Katy Perry's songs.
- [01:57]
Kevin Roose
I was impressed that you kept it going this long. I'm Kevin Roos, a tech columnist at the New York Times.
- [02:07]
Casey Newton
I'm Casey Noon from Platformer, and this is Hard Fork this week, the company that said chatbots aren't safe for kids. Why? Character AI is taking AI companions away from teens. Then Elon Musk built a Wikipedia clone. Let's see what it says on Kevin's page. And finally, journalist AJ Jacobs is here to talk about the two terrifying days he spent without any artificial intelligence at all. My God, I hope he's okay.
- [02:41]
Kevin Roose
Well, Kasey, this week we got some really surprising news about a company that we have talked about on this show before. This is Character AI, the company that makes these sort of realistic chatbot companions. We talked about it about a year ago on the show in the context of this very tragic story of Sesser III, a 14 year old boy who took his own life after becoming emotionally attached to a Game of Thrones chatbot on Character AI. We got a big update on that story this week, which is that character AI is barring minors, people under 18 from having conversations with its chatbots. And it is basically saying, we are not going to offer this service to minors anymore.
- [03:28]
Casey Newton
Yeah. And there is some nuance here that we'll get into, but at a high level, Kevin, I think this is one of the most dramatic steps we have yet seen from a major AI company to try to address the very real harms that these technologies pose, particularly to young people.
- [03:47]
Kevin Roose
Yes. So let's get into the details, but before we do, let's make our AI disclosures. Kasey, what is yours?
- [03:53]
Casey Newton
My boyfriend works at Anthropic and I.
- [03:55]
Kevin Roose
Work at the New York Times, which is suing OpenAI and Microsoft over alleged copyright violations.
- [04:01]
Casey Newton
Yeah.
- [04:02]
Kevin Roose
So just to remind folks who may not remember the initial story, Character AI is a company that was started several years ago by leading AI researchers from Google who left that company. Noam Shazir and Daniel defraitas were their two co founders. They were frustrated that Google was not sort of releasing this chatbot they had worked on. And so they said, we're going to go off and build our own startup where we're going to release these chatbots based on large language models. You can make characters, you can talk with them. It's sort of a role playing app experience. And it became enormously popular with young people. This was one of the first generative AI chatbot based apps that really took off and many of the users were teenagers or even younger. And if you went on as I did and I spent some time reporting on this, there were just a lot of chatbots that seemed really aimed at young people, people chatbots that would sort of take the Persona of your friend at school or a bully or your crush. It was like a very young seeming app.
- [05:03]
Casey Newton
Yeah. Or also characters from Game of Thrones or you name the franchise. You know, I think the original idea animating Character AI is, hey, what if you could chat with a lot of copyrighted material that did not belong to Character AI. And it turned out that that was hugely popular with a bunch of kids who wanted to talk to know, Pikachu or whoever.
- [05:21]
Kevin Roose
Yeah. And the company, when I was reporting on it a year ago, wouldn't tell me how many of its users were under 18, but said that it was like a significant number. And so when I hear things like that, I just assume that this is an app that is predominantly used by young people. For that reason, it's a very big deal that they're making these changes to basically wall themselves off from young people, at least for their central use case.
- [05:42]
Casey Newton
Yes. And I think that that comes after really sustained public pressure in the wake of Sewell's death. There are other lawsuits against the. I have to imagine that at some point the lawyers at this company said that the legal risk to us is simply too great. We believe Character AI has about 20 million monthly users, is the figure that I have seen reported. And they think that there's a better opportunity for them building for adults, at least in the moment, than in making this technology available to kids.
- [06:13]
Kevin Roose
Yeah. So let's talk about the specifics here, about how this is going to work. Character AI put out a blog post this week spelling out the changes that they're making. They say that over the next month they will identify users under 18 and begin giving them time limits on their ability to chat with characters. That limit initially, they say, will be two hours a day, and it will ramp down in the coming weeks. And by November 25th. So roughly a month from now, under 18, users will not be able to converse in open ended conversations with any character AI chatbots. Basically, they are going to limit the length of the conversations, maybe the topics of the conversations, and they are going to try to give teen users other ways to what they say, be creative, for example, by creating video stories and streams with characters. But they will not allow this kind of open ended role playing experience anymore.
- [07:06]
Casey Newton
So if you just want to create a little bit of synthetic media featuring these characters, that's okay. But what's not okay is essentially the thing that seemed like it was really problematic in Sewall's case. Right. Sewell had developed this very intense relationship with a chatbot that was called Daenerys Targaryen, as in, you know, the Game of Thrones character. And I think there are a lot of concerns about kids getting into these very emotionally heavy relationships with these synthetic characters. It can kind of take them into a world of delusion. It can separate them from their friends and family. That's the sort of thing that's not going to be allowed anymore.
- [07:39]
Kevin Roose
Yes. So it's unclear exactly what character AI is going to do now that it's giving up on what is essentially its sort of entire core use case for young people. They say that less than 10% of their current users are self reporting as being under the age of 18. That's a, according to their CEO, but obviously that is self reporting. And I think a lot of teenagers are lying about their age.
- [08:05]
Casey Newton
Do you know how many times I lied about my age on the Internet?
- [08:07]
Kevin Roose
Yes. So I have had an experience over the past couple of months where I have just started to feel like this is the most important and least understood topic in technology right now. I was recently at high school and I often like to sort of poll students about how they're using AI. And so I asked at this high school, like, raise your hand if you have an AI friend. And about a third of them put their hands up. This is something that was, I think a year or two ago considered kind of fringe, kind of unusual for young people to have these intimate relationships with the chatbots. But the chatbots have gotten better and more compelling and more persuasive and, and it is just starting to become this like, mass social phenomenon. There's one study as a survey done by Common Sense Media recently that found that 52% of American teenagers are regular users of AI companions, which is a startling figure and represents just like how quickly this all is happening. And another stat that I found very alarming from this survey was that nearly one third of teens find AI conversations as satisfying or more satisfying than human conversations.
- [09:23]
Casey Newton
Absolutely. And why is that? We've talked about it so many times on the show. These chatbots are designed to be agreeable, to tell you that you're correct and, and to support you. And that's not inherently a bad thing. But if it becomes your primary mode of socialization, it does seem like there is some real danger here. And Character is the first company that has said instead of trying to introduce these sort of, you know, mealy mouthed, incremental tweaks and guardrails, we're actually just going to shut the whole thing down and so we can figure out what's going on. Yeah.
- [09:52]
Kevin Roose
And I think in the minds of a lot of parents or people who, you know, understand and are worried about this phenomenon of AI companions for young people, there is a sense of relief about these changes, a sense that maybe this one company at least has decided to put people's health and well being above their own profits. And I was texting a little bit this morning with Megan Garcia, who is the mother of Sewell Setzer. Just sort of seeing how she felt about this. She filed this lawsuit. She's been sort of becoming more of an advocate for these issues. And she gave me permission to share this. She said, I'm relieved for the children that will actually lose access to Character AI because those are lives that can be saved, even if it's one child. But I can't help but feel cheated. Why did it take Sewell dying and me taking on this tech company to get them to do this? So I think for Megan and for, I'm sure the rest of her family, there is some relief, but also some frustration with, like, why did it take a lawsuit, Enormous public pressure, pressure from regulators around the world to get this company to act.
- [11:03]
Casey Newton
Yeah. So this announcement has not been universally praised. The Tech Justice Law Project, which is one of the organizations that brought the lawsuit, sent us a note this morning. They pointed out that Character AI had not really said how they were going to do age assurance to make sure that all of the adult users who will continue to get access to these chat bots actually are adults. They also noted that the company had not addressed, quote, the possible psychological impact of suddenly disabling access to young users, given the emotional dependencies that have been created. So I thought that is worth saying we have seen when other companion bots have removed access, how jarring and painful it can be to the people who use them. So while I'm glad that Character AI is going to be sort of ramping these users down as opposed to simply just pulling out the plug, I do think it's worth saying this. This may be painful for some of their users.
- [12:02]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, I think that's a really good point. I think just because these are not human relationships doesn't mean that they can't produce pain and grief when people lose their connections to something that they have grown attached to. So, yeah, I think we should be very sympathetic and empathetic toward people who may be having a hard time now that their chat bots aren't talking to them.
- [12:22]
Casey Newton
So what kind of impact do you expect this move from Character to have on the rest of the industry?
- [12:28]
Kevin Roose
Not much. I mean, I think character was a sort of special case. They actually have lost most of their founding executives and leadership. Noam Shazir and Daniel DeFreitas went back to Google and basically sort of left behind the kind of shell of this company. So I don't expect that, like, Character AI is going to recover from this. I think they were probably already in a state of losing users, just seeing the sort of decline of their platform. So this may be sort of a final nail in the coffin for them. But I think what has happened is that the rest of the industry is now doing what Character AI used to want to do. I think the ones that we've talked about on the show, OpenAI and Meta, that are really pushing into this use case, I don't know that they're sort of learning the right lessons from what has been happening with Character AI.
- [13:14]
Casey Newton
Yeah, I mean, I. I have to say I think it's going to have maybe a bigger impact than you do for this reason. Inevitably there are going to be congressional hearings about this, and I think Character AI will probably be there and they're going to say why they did this, and then they're going to go over to whoever is there from Meta or Open AI and say, why do you guys think this is safer than they do? Right. Why do you, Meta, still have Nasty Nancy available on your platform? And I think that that's just going to put a really interesting sort of pressure on them if. If to do nothing else than to have a response as to how they are justifying what they are doing. Right. And to try to put some sort of case behind it other than everyone else is doing it. Which is an argument I have heard META make about why these chatbots are available. Yeah.
- [14:00]
Kevin Roose
And I think one way that the bigger AI companies may respond to that is by saying, well, look, we are just so big now, we have so many users, and some small percentage of those people are going to experience mental health crises in their lives, maybe even while using our product. But that number is small relative to the number of users of our products. In total. This is what I would call like the prevalence argument, which we heard a lot from social media companies a decade ago. They would say, oh, yeah, there is like, you know, hate speech and toxicity on our platforms. But, like, if you just look at like the overall percentage, it's like quite small and meaningless. So I just think we'll start to see a lot more of that kind of argument.
- [14:44]
Casey Newton
You know, this whole discussion, Kevin, ties into some really interesting research that OpenAI released, released this week, where they began to map out the scale of the mental health crisis as it can be seen on ChatGPT itself. There are now more than 800 million people a week using the platform. That's a pretty, you know, Decent subset of the population. And while the numbers of people who are having these kind of, you know, disturbing or, you know, potentially dangerous conversations with ChatGPT are low on a percentage basis, by the company's own estimates, you have 560,000 people a week whose messages to chat GPT indicate psychosis or mania, 1.2 million people a week who are potentially developing an unhealthy bond to a chatbot, and 1.2 million people who are having conversations that contain, quote, indicators of potential suicidal planning or intent. So if you just want to be very cynical about this and think about it only from a legal liability perspective, if you have more than a million people a week who are developing an unhealthy bond to your chatbot who are expressing thoughts of self harm, think about the lawsuits that are going to follow. Right? I mean that, that could be just hugely damaging. So I wonder if the other big labs will look at what character AI did this week and decide maybe we actually should build some of these safeguards faster.
- [16:11]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, I don't know. I'm, I'm still not that optimistic. I think that these companies are kind of trapped because they want the engagement and the depth of connection that people are having with their products. Like any company that makes technology wants people to, if not fall in love with it, at least develop like a bond with it and feel like very connected to it. So they want that, but they don't want the responsibility for the emotional relationships that people are going to develop with these systems already are developing in many cases.
- [16:45]
Casey Newton
Yeah, I mean the main conclusion that I have about this whole story, Kevin, is just that this story reminds us, us that nothing is inevitable when it comes to AI, right? You don't have to build it, you don't have to release it to everyone, you don't have to make it free, you don't have to decline to build any meaningful guardrails. You can actually just say based on what we've seen, we don't think that this is safe and we are going to take it off the market. And at a time when everyone has their foot on the gas pedal and everyone feels like they're in this all out existential race to a finish line called AGI. I've been so worried that companies were going to cut corners when it comes to safety. We've seen it over and over again. And so while you hate to give too much credit to a company, particularly one like character AI, which did after all get itself into this mess in the first place, I do think there is something to be said for saying we are going to stop the bleeding here. We are actually going to admit that we don't know how this affects people and we're going to take it off the market.
- [17:51]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, I mean, I think it's a really overdue but responsible thing that they did. I think they probably had their hand forced by the lawsuits and the regulators breathing down their necks. And so I hope that Mark Zuckerberg and Sam Altman and these folks who are building these very persuasive, compelling chatbot companions are looking at this as a cautionary tale for what can happen if you don't think about the consequences of what you're building.
- [18:18]
Casey Newton
Kevin, maybe one more thing to say about this. We are living through a dramatic contraction in the access that teenagers have to technology online. In the same week that we are announcing this, YouTube, Snap, TikTok and Meta have all said that they will abide by a law passed in Australia that will ban kids under 16 from having a social media account. So you can still look at YouTube, but you cannot have your own account. You're going to have to use someone else's, and you can't have an Instagram account, you can't have a TikTok account. So that's something that there are many American states that are trying to bring about with sort of mixed success based on legal rulings. But I think you look at what character AI is doing, you look at what what some of the states here are doing, you look at what Australia is doing, and I think the social media and AI companies have just lost this argument. Right. There is no longer a consensus that unfettered access to these technologies is good or healthy or safe for teens, and people are finally starting to do something about that.
- [19:26]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, I think that's right. But I think the question of how to regulate these chatbot companions is only kind of part of what I'm thinking about these days, because I don't think this is actually something that we're going to be able to regulate our way out of. I think even if, you know, countries do what Australia has done and ban social media use for kids under 16, kids are going to find this stuff, they're going to get access to it, they're going to think it's compelling, some number of them are going to grow emotionally attached to it. And so I think we do actually have to also address the real possibility that there's really nothing we can do at a regulatory level to prevent every teenager from forming an emotional attachment to a chatbot.
- [20:04]
Casey Newton
I don't know, I think that sometimes passing rules like this can be the first step toward a society just changing its relationship with these technologies overall. You know, when I went to high school, there was still a smoking section indoors at my school because it was just sort of taken as a given that. Yeah, well, you know, you can't stop the seniors from smoking. It's cigarette, of course they're going to smoke their cigarettes. But you know, you go back to my high school today, there's no smoking section. And banning it for teens, I think was part of a larger movement of telling the adults, hey, this isn't actually very good for you either. Right? And eventually that sort of shifted. So I think there may be some hope that if we can take the next generation and not have their primary relationships be with character AI, there is some hope that maybe this doesn't actually change society quite as radically as maybe it otherwise might.
- [20:52]
Kevin Roose
There was a smoking section at your high school.
- [20:54]
Casey Newton
Can you believe that?
- [20:54]
Kevin Roose
That's amazing. What year was that?
- [20:55]
Casey Newton
This was the late 1990s. Now it was the 1900s, but it was like the very end of them.
- [21:04]
Kevin Roose
When we come back, a look inside Elon Musk's new Wikipedia clone and what it says about about Casey's relationship.
- [21:20]
Sponsor/Advertisement Voice
This podcast is supported by Crucible Moments, a podcast about the decisions and inflection points that shape the journeys of the world's most influential startups. Hosted by Sequoia Capital's Rule of Botha Crucible Moments Season 3 pulls back the curtain on the untold stories behind companies like Stripe, Zipline, Palo Alto Networks, Klarna Supercell, and more. Tune in to Sequoia's new season of Crucible Moments to discover how some of the most transformational companies of the modern era were built. Crucible Moments is available everywhere you get your podcasts AI companies have unique business models, each with distinct billing needs. Stripe is the go to choice for AI leaders, from early stage startups to scaled enterprises. With Stripe billing, you can support any business model and easily align your monetization strategy with customer value. Join the ranks of 78% of the Forbes AI 50 and millions of businesses worldwide that trust Stripe to help them build more profitable scalable businesses. Discover more@swepe.com Painters don't limit themselves to.
- [22:25]
Kevin Roose
Just one brush, so why limit yourself to one model when creating with AI? Meet Adobe Firefly, Adobe's all in one app for AI powered creation. Firefly gives you access to industry leading models From Adobe, Google, OpenAI Runway, Luma AI, Black Forest Labs and more. Generate an image Turn it into a video and create custom sounds, all in the Firefly app. Each model brings its own unique strengths, and Firefly puts them all at your fingertips for one price. Try it today@adobe.com Firefly.
- [23:00]
Casey Newton
Well, Kevin, I was reading about you recently.
- [23:02]
Kevin Roose
Oh, yeah?
- [23:02]
Casey Newton
Yes. Let me ask you if this is true, because I read someone say this about you, that when you were growing up, your upbringing fostered an outsider's perspective on religious and cultural fringes, shaped by a family dynamic that prioritized open inquiry over doctrinal adherence. How do you respond to these charges?
- [23:19]
Kevin Roose
How'd you get into my therapist's notes?
- [23:21]
Casey Newton
Believe it or not, Kevin, that's not your therapist. That's from a little something called Grokopedia.
- [23:25]
Kevin Roose
Oh, boy.
- [23:26]
Casey Newton
Grokipedia, of course. The Wikipedia competitor Challenger that has been developed by Elon Musk and Xai as part of a huge culture war that has gone on over the world's most popular encyclopedia. And I thought today we should take a look at this thing and talk about what we think.
- [23:46]
Kevin Roose
So I need you to kind of walk me slowly through this, because I'm coming to this.
- [23:50]
Casey Newton
I'm going to walk you slowly through this.
- [23:51]
Kevin Roose
I am coming to this totally cold, and I want to get into Grokipedia and all the details, but first I must know, what else does Scrapedia say about me?
- [23:59]
Casey Newton
Oh, my goodness. Well, first of all, this article is long. There are more than a dozen subsections about your life, including your books, your New York Times career, and my personal favorite, notable events and controversies.
- [24:13]
Kevin Roose
What are my notable events and controversies?
- [24:15]
Casey Newton
Well, you'll be happy to know that there is an extended section about your interaction with a certain Bing Sydney chatbot back in 2023.
- [24:23]
Kevin Roose
Never heard of it.
- [24:24]
Casey Newton
It. And then there is also criticisms of your AI reporting.
- [24:27]
Kevin Roose
Oh, boy.
- [24:27]
Casey Newton
Which we can save those for.
- [24:29]
Kevin Roose
For. Save those for our Patreon subscribers.
- [24:32]
Casey Newton
Yes, exactly. Check the Patreon if you want to hear those.
- [24:36]
Kevin Roose
So, obviously, Grokopedia is part of Elon Musk's AI Chatbot Grok. But what is this project? And why did he decide to make his own Wikipedia?
- [24:47]
Casey Newton
So, for well over a year now, conservatives and the right wing have been fomenting this backlash against Wikipedia, Wikipedia, which they say is biased against conservatives. That is, of course, a familiar conservative talking point about basically every popular tech platform on the Internet. In the case of Wikipedia, they're particularly concerned that Wikipedia editors have labeled a bunch of conservative media as unreliable and therefore ineligible for inclusion as citations on articles about controversial subjects.
- [25:23]
Kevin Roose
It's a little too woke up, if you know what I'm saying.
- [25:26]
Casey Newton
I do know what you're saying saying, and I don't like it because embedded in that critique is the idea that, for example, the Heritage Foundation's blog post or Breitbart or Fox News's political coverage deserve to be seen with the same credibility and fact checking journalistic rigor of, let's say, platformer news.
- [25:52]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, I feel like this happens kind of every few years where like a group of partisan activists like gets very mad at wikiped media like the crown jewel of the Internet. Like every three years people are just like, it's horrible, it's biased, we have to destroy it.
- [26:06]
Casey Newton
Yes, and this particular backlash seemed to get a lot of fuel after the famous Elon Musk was it a Nazi salute incident?
- [26:15]
Kevin Roose
What happened there?
- [26:16]
Casey Newton
Well, you may.
- [26:17]
Kevin Roose
I remember the. I remember the incident, but what was the controversy surrounding it?
- [26:21]
Casey Newton
Well, Elon Musk says and has continued to argue across many, many, many posts on X that this was not a Nazi salute. And now whenever any Democratic politician raises, and in a vaguely Nazi salute seeming way, he does a post about it. But he's very mad about how this controversy was handled on Wikipedia, where there is an entire page devoted to it. And that appears to be one of the main reasons why Elon Musk says we are going to build our own Wikipedia. It is not going to have these same biases baked into it. It is going to be maximally truth seeking to use one of his favorite phrases. And as of this week, it is now life.
- [27:00]
Kevin Roose
So can I just ask some technical details about Grokopedia? So is it all written by AI? Is that the premise here?
- [27:06]
Casey Newton
Well, certainly Grok seems to have played a starring role in this thing. When you read it, it reads very much like Grok output. But as many writers have noted, including J. Peters at the Verge, when you do side by side comparisons of Wikipedia and Grok, there appears to be just some pure plagiarism. And Grok does acknowledge that that it has used large chunks of Wikipedia under Wikipedia's license.
- [27:32]
Kevin Roose
So it seems like maybe Elon Musk and his team have sort of ingested some or all of the sort of regular Wikipedia and just given Grok a prompt that's like kind of rewrite this to be more Grok.
- [27:44]
Casey Newton
Like yes. And at launch Grokopedia has more than 800,000 articles. That compares to around 7 million on English language Wikipedia. So it is a small subset, but presumably that will grow over time.
- [27:59]
Kevin Roose
Right? And can anyone edit the articles on Grokopedia as on Wikipedia.
- [28:04]
Casey Newton
No, you cannot. What you can do, if you see something on Grokopedia that you think is wrong, you can highlight it and then a little button will pop up that lets you click it, and you can say, this is wrong, and you can sort of make your case. And that seems like a great way to waste a lot of time if you have nothing else to do in your life.
- [28:20]
Kevin Roose
Hang on, give me a second. I have some bones to pick with my Grokopedia entry.
- [28:26]
Casey Newton
You really haven't looked at yours yet?
- [28:27]
Kevin Roose
No.
- [28:27]
Casey Newton
Oh, well, of course I had to look at mine.
- [28:29]
Kevin Roose
Yeah. What did yours say?
- [28:29]
Casey Newton
First of all, I'm very proud of us that we made the first 800,000 articles in this encyclopedia. Right.
- [28:35]
Kevin Roose
Not easy to do.
- [28:36]
Casey Newton
I was not one of the first 800,000 entries on Wikipedia, I'll tell you that much, so. Appreciate that.
- [28:41]
Kevin Roose
Wait, I have to go see this for myself.
- [28:42]
Casey Newton
Go ahead and pull it up. I want to be intellectually honest here. There are parts about my Grokopedia page that I like. It goes into way more detail than my Wikipedia page does. And I think overall presents, like, a pretty good picture of, like, who I am and what I have done.
- [28:59]
Kevin Roose
Oh, my God, it's so long.
- [29:00]
Casey Newton
It's incredible. I'll say it. It's too long. Like, nobody actually wants that much information about me.
- [29:04]
Kevin Roose
Wait, can I read the family and relationship section to you? Yes, please do, because this is breaking some news here on this podcast. It says Newton is married to a lawyer. Congratulations. I thought your boyfriend worked at Anthropic.
- [29:17]
Casey Newton
Well, he does. And so we have found the first of many mistakes that you will find in Rocco Media.
- [29:23]
Kevin Roose
He maintains a low public profile regarding his personal relationships. Not true. Can't stop talking about it. With no further details on partnerships or children disclosed in available interviews or profiles.
- [29:35]
Casey Newton
Yeah, so I guess I'll try to say more about my boyfriend to try to help Grokopedia.
- [29:39]
Kevin Roose
Wow. It's got your Goodreads profile here. Newton exhibits a keen interest in reading. False. He hasn't read a book in years. Evidence by his Goodreads profile, cataloging 112 books with ongoing reads, including Cahokia Jazz by Francis Spuffer, the Saint of Bright Doors by Vajra Chandrasekara and others spanning fiction and nonfiction.
- [29:59]
Casey Newton
Let me give a shout out to the Saint of Bright Doors. By the way, that is the best book I've read this year. Super, super good. So, yeah, so there. I mean, there's, like, kind of something A little creepy about it, right? It's like we're gonna like go in and look at all of your public profiles and kind of see what we can scrape in. But I do think it like winds up putting together a kind of, you know, decent picture of my life. Now for the most part, I've been able to stay out of a lot of culture wars and political controversies and civil rights. So, you know, I didn't see anything in there that made me, you know, really roll my eyes and feel bad. If though you are an Elon Musk or a Donald Trump, you may find that you're getting a much friendlier treatment on Grokopedia than you would on Wikipedia.
- [30:37]
Kevin Roose
Okay, so let's talk about the politics of Grokopedia. Where does it differ meaningfully from standard issue Wikipedia?
- [30:46]
Casey Newton
So because it is designed as a kind of right wing alternative, when you pull up articles that have been the subject of a lot of cult or warring, you will just find material that is much closer to the conservative or Republican view. So for example, if you pull up the article on Donald Trump and there is what I would say is a very friendly view of the events of January 6, 2021, that sort of goes out of its way to talk about how, you know, Democrats sort of overstated the risk to democracy. So I will say that in some ways I expected Grokopedia to go further to the right. And like, you know, do not get it wrong. There is lot of really racist stuff in Grokopedia. There's a lot of anti trans stuff in Grokopedia. But like, as somebody who has spent more than a share of time like reading 4chan and like are the Donald back in the day, the stuff that I'm seeing in Grokopedia is not as bad as that.
- [31:45]
Kevin Roose
What is the strategy here? Like, what is Elon Musk hoping to accomplish? Is he hoping that people will, instead of going to Wikipedia to learn about stuff, go to Grokopedia and that we will sort of educate people differently in this country.
- [31:57]
Casey Newton
Yeah, I think, you know, I read a quote in the New York Times article about the, the Grokopedia launch where they had some scholar who said like, ever since people began to study things, people have wanted to control knowledge and how it is distributed. Right. And I think Grokopedia is just a step in that direction. If you believe that Wikipedia has a chokehold on the public imagination. If you're concerned that Wikipedia data is being used as a pillar of most of the big, large language models that we're now using every day. If you wanted to inject other views into the populace, you might want to create something like Rock Media.
- [32:33]
Kevin Roose
Yeah. I'm also wondering how much of it has to do with the actual training of Grok, because one thing that we know is that Elon Musk has been frustrated in the past that despite his best efforts, it keeps sort of hoovering up all this data from the Internet and that makes it, he thinks, too liberal. And so I'm wondering if this is kind of like an effort to give Grok a new kind of substrate of knowledge that it can learn from so that it's not reliant on Wiki Wikipedia.
- [33:00]
Casey Newton
I mean, it's an interesting idea, but I'm not sure how much original work GROK is really doing. Like, I think that it is almost certainly showing you a wider range of sources than you might find on Wikipedia or at least a wider range of right leaning sources. But it's not as if there are a bunch of like, you know, right leaning Grokopedia editors who are going out there, you know, doing original research or something like this is very much, much akin to like a deep research report that you might get a chat GPT or a Gemini to do for you, except that this time it's Grok.
- [33:36]
Kevin Roose
Right. So how much of a big deal is this? Like, are you seeing reactions from people who are scared that this actually will replace Wikipedia? Is this just kind of like one of Elon's many passion projects?
- [33:47]
Casey Newton
You know, so far I don't know that Grokipedia has made much of a splash in the mainstream. Aside from just being a curiosity. If you follow Elon Musk on X and you visit X a lot, it is something that you've heard a lot about. And I've seen conservatives and the tech right talking up certain Grokipedia pages is like, aha, this is so much better than Wikipedia. So it is kind of having that moment right now. How long does that last? I don't know. You know, Wikipedia is one of the very most popular sites on the Internet and it's going to take a lot to displace that.
- [34:23]
Kevin Roose
Right.
- [34:23]
Casey Newton
I think for a lot of people going to Wikipedia is just muscle memory. So barring some sort of of massive leverage that Elon Musk is able to get in distributing Grokipedia to more people, I think it's probably going to remain more of a curiosity.
- [34:36]
Kevin Roose
Yeah. And do you think this contributes to sort of the fears that people have about the decline of Wikipedia? Because we've Been, you know, talking for years now about how generative AI chat bots are now people's increasingly their first step toward learning about a new subject. Where maybe before, you know, if you wanted to learn about the, I don't know, the Franco Prussian War, you would have like gone to the Wikipedia page for, for it. But now you might pop open ChatGPT and just ask for information and it would sort of go out and look at Wikipedia and other sources for you and synthesize it. So is this like coming at a time where Wikipedia is already pretty vulnerable as a result of AI?
- [35:11]
Casey Newton
I think to the extent that Wikipedia is vulnerable, Grokipedia doesn't really pose much additional threat. I think by far the larger threat to Wikipedia is what you just said. It is that more and more people are accessing the information via chatbots, via Google search results. And the main consequence of that for Wikipedia is that if Wikipedia can't get you to go to the site, it also can't get you to contribute, it can't get you to update articles, it can't get you to become an editor. And so the fear is that as traffic to Wikipedia declines, the quality of the site will decline as well. And in fact, just this month Wikipedia published a blog post in which they said they are starting to see traffic declines due to generative AI. So that's a very real threat to the encyclopedia Grokopedia, I think, isn't quite that.
- [35:58]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, I mean, whether or not Grokopedia takes off as a product, I think that this larger effort to delegitimize Wikipedia is quite possibly going to be successful. Because I think that people on the right especially have identified that, you know, even though Wikipedia looks like this sort of canonical thing that is just sort of appearing on the Internet like it is made by people, a relatively small percentage of people on Wikipedia are actually contributing to it. And so I think they have recognized that this is another set of refs that they can essentially work are the Wikipedia editors and the moderators who control the rules. And maybe that is sort of the larger victory that they see as being possible here is maybe they can just kind of undermine the sort of long standing traditions and norms of the Wikipedia community and get it to behave more like Grokopedia.
- [36:54]
Casey Newton
We'll see. I think Wikipedia has been really resilient so far. You know, there actually have been hearings in Congress about this alleged bias in Wikipedia, which I find outrageous because Wikipedia should be able to say whatever it wants about vaccines or January 6th or whatever else, right? It doesn't have any legal obligation to the federal government to provide one set of views over another. But that does get Kevin at why, on balance, I'm actually glad that rockypedia exists.
- [37:24]
Kevin Roose
This. Why?
- [37:25]
Casey Newton
Because I think if you see something online and you get really mad and you think that there is a better and smarter view out there, I think the best thing to do is to just put it up on the web. Right. Not in every single case. There's some, like, horrible things that I wish you wouldn't post on the web. But look, if you want to have a debate about January 6th, go ahead and create a web page. Right? That is my preferred, you know, resolution to political conversations as opposed to, to we are going to start having hearings to try to pressure Wikipedia into having one particular political view. So I view Grokopedia as silly and bad and offensive as it can sometimes be, as still a case of countering speech with more speech. And I think that that is overall a better way to have a democracy.
- [38:08]
Kevin Roose
Yeah. So I understand that take. But I'm also wondering if the fact that Grokopedia is AI generated makes it any different. Like, like, is the answer to, like, speech that you don't like really having a chatbot go out there and write a bunch of slop text for you.
- [38:24]
Casey Newton
I think that is a good question. And maybe we should sort of value Grokopedia less than we do Wikipedia for that reason. At the same time, humans are involved in the creating and the shaping of Grokopedia. Right. Like, it seems very unlikely to me that what we're reading on some of these really high profile entries has not been edited or tweaked by someone. Right. So I, I think I still see a pretty strong human hand in here. And that's why, on balance, it still does feel like counter speech to me.
- [38:53]
Kevin Roose
Wow, that's a very pro First Amendment take from you. Yeah. Your lawyer husband must be so proud. I just think, like, this inevitably ends with, like, Elon Musk, like, forcing a state government to, like, teach Grokopedia in schools.
- [39:13]
Casey Newton
I mean, you, you joke, but, like, that's probably only a half joke. And I would be surprised if it does become, like, the curriculum in Texas in 2028. So we should absolutely keep an eye on that. And there are places it can go bad. But, like, at the end of the day, one thing about me as an elder millennial is I love the web. And so I'm generally in favor of people making websites. Because, look, at the end of the day, the truth is Most websites just get ignored, but they wind up being useful for like, some people. Right. So look, I'm not going to be visiting Rockipedia every day, but if the uncle who you're going to have your worst conversation with at Thanksgiving this year wants to use it, that's fine.
- [39:54]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, I mean, I just, my bigger question is like whether this whole category of kind of the online encyclopedia is just obsolete. Right. Like, I love Wikipedia as an idea, as an expression of collective knowledge, as what I consider like a true gem of the Internet.
- [40:16]
Casey Newton
It's a miracle.
- [40:17]
Kevin Roose
It's a miracle. And I cannot tell you the last time I went to Wikipedia. Really? Yes.
- [40:23]
Casey Newton
Oh, I'm there every day. Really? Yes.
- [40:25]
Kevin Roose
So I feel like, you know, I go there now when I need to check something that a chatbot has told me, but I do not really go there there as my first stop on any sort of given fact finding mission because my consumption has shifted almost entirely to these chatbots and to search engines. We should say. Like, I still do use Google on occasion. So I just wonder if, like, there is any future in which Grokopedia, Wikipedia, any of these sites have a realistic hope of making it, or if they just sort of end up being kind of crammed into the chatbots and that becomes people. People's primary way of finding things out.
- [41:05]
Casey Newton
Well, I think you're onto something real here. Because of all of the products that Elon Musk has launched in the past 10 years, Rockypedia does seem like by far the least forward looking.
- [41:16]
Kevin Roose
Yes.
- [41:16]
Casey Newton
Right now it is possible that you could take the contents of Rockipedia and find other ways to distribute them. And maybe that's what he will do. You know, notably, he is not relying on human contributors to bring in the knowledge or because he just stole most of what was on Wikipedia. Those humans already did the work for him, but he can just take the, the material that he already has and sort of find new things to do with it, you know, update it via conservative media of, you know, whichever flavor he likes. And so maybe that's the way that this thing winds up being a little bit more forward looking than it seems today.
- [41:50]
Kevin Roose
Yeah.
- [41:51]
Casey Newton
What's, what's your, what's your pediatric take?
- [41:53]
Kevin Roose
Well, let me, let me spend a little more time on it. Let me see what it has to say about the Hard Fork podcast.
- [41:59]
Casey Newton
Oh, that's. Let's. Do we have a page?
- [42:01]
Kevin Roose
We don't have a page. Okay. I hate this thing. We could do tuning fork, Fork Clark Fork river or pastry fork. Let's See what it has to say about pastry fork when we come back. Why author A.J. jacobs collected rainwater and foraged food while spending two days with no AI.
- [42:43]
Sponsor/Advertisement Voice
As a small business owner, you don't have the luxury of clocking out early. Your business is on your mind 24 7. So when you're hiring, you need a partner that works just as hard as you do. That hiring partner is LinkedIn Jobs. When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in. LinkedIn makes it easy to post your job for free, share it with your network, and get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. Post your job. LinkedIn's new feature can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people with deep candidate insights. Either post your job for free or pay to promote promoted jobs. Get three times more qualified applicants. At the end of the day, the most important thing to your small business is the quality of candidates. And with LinkedIn, you can feel confident that you're getting the best. Find out why more than 2.5 million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next great hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at LinkedIn.com hardfork that's LinkedIn.com hardfork to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.
- [43:43]
With real world experience across a range of industries, Deloitte helps recognize how a breakthrough in aerospace might ripple into healthcare, how an innovation in agriculture could trickle into retail or biotech or even manufacturing. Is it clairvoyance? Hardly. It's what happens when experienced multidisciplinary teams and innovative tech come together to offer clients bold new approaches to address their unique challenges, helping them confidently navigate what's next. Deloitte together makes progress.
- [44:19]
Kevin Roose
Well, Kasey, you and I are AI maximalists. We use this stuff all the time. But today we're going to talk with someone on the show who went 48 hours without using AI at all. An unthinkable idea to me.
- [44:31]
Casey Newton
Suffice to say, an experiment that would not have occurred to the two of us to try.
- [44:35]
Kevin Roose
Yes. So today on the show, our guest is AJ Jacobs. AJ Is a great writer and former mentor of mine. He was actually my first boss in journalism. I helped him with a book many years ago, about 20 years ago now. God, about the Bible. He is known for these kind of immersive experiments where he throws himself deeply into a topic. He wrote a book about following the Constitution, literally. He wrote a book about following the Bible literally. He's also the host of the Puzzler podcast and this week, he published an article in the New York Times titled 48 Hours Without AI in which he sets out to live his life with his AI Contact as possible.
- [45:12]
Casey Newton
Yeah. And, you know, my expectation as I started to read this piece was that it would be pretty easy to go 48 hours without using AI but for reasons that AJ gets into, it actually winds up being quite difficult.
- [45:25]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, you essentially have to time travel back to the 1800s to avoid contacting anything that has any form of AI in it. And I think it's a useful point in addition to being a very fun article, because it does drive home just how intertwined all this stuff is with the way we live our lives today. And it's not. Not inevitable that it's going to continue getting more intertwined, but I think it's a pretty good bet.
- [45:47]
Casey Newton
Yeah. So this is a story that begins with AJ Forswearing modern electricity and ends with him foraging for food in Central Park. And I think it's time to bring him in and talk about it.
- [45:57]
Kevin Roose
Yes, he. His life sort of resembled that show, Naked and Afraid, where you have to just kind of find your way out of the forest. That's what living without AI in the year 2025 is like, according to AJJ Jacobs.
- [46:11]
Casey Newton
Let's bring him in.
- [46:18]
Kevin Roose
AJ Jacobs, welcome to Hard Fork.
- [46:20]
AJ Jacobs
Delighted to be here. Thank you, Kevin. Thank you, Casey.
- [46:23]
Kevin Roose
So you just did this experiment where you went 48 hours without using AI or machine learning, and I want to talk to you all about that, but can we just start with the photos at the top of this story? You are wearing what I would describe as a sort of very loud outfit that has some, like, red checkered pants and, like, a paisley flowered print shirt and these, like, glasses that look kind of like, you know, Elton John or like the ones you get after you get your pupils dilated.
- [46:55]
AJ Jacobs
Right. I brought them along.
- [46:57]
Kevin Roose
So why the fit? Explain this.
- [47:02]
AJ Jacobs
Well, the premise of the article was, as you said, try not to interact with AI or machine learning for 48, eight hours. And one thing I realized quite early on was it's everywhere. It is everywhere, especially machine learning. So clothing designers are experimenting with it in terms of designing, but also anything on the supply chain is totally machine learning optimized. They figure out how to route it, how to pack it using machine learning. So I'm like, well, anything in my closet that's 10 years old or less. Less is probably off limits if I'm really being strict. But I did have in deep in my closet, my grandfather's 1970s paisley shirt and red and white checkered pants. And I. He went through an Austin Powers face. He was very much a dandy. And I was like, all right, I gotta do it. Even though it made me very uncomfortable. Although my wife said that it. It was the coolest I had looked since we've been married, which was insulting and also flattering.
- [48:09]
Casey Newton
I think you got the timing right. I think it's been so long since those clothes were in fashion that they now actually do look fashionable again.
- [48:15]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, yeah.
- [48:16]
Casey Newton
AJ, Let me ask you this. As you headed into this experiment, what is or was your relationship with AI? Are you the sort of person who Was using generative AI tools like ChatGPT every day? Was it a more occasional thing? Or where were you on that spectrum?
- [48:33]
AJ Jacobs
Yeah, I would say I'm in the middle. I'm not a Luddite, but I don't, like, have it controlling my life. I did use it for research, and it was actually not bad. I was impressed.
- [48:43]
Kevin Roose
Got it. So you were not trying to prove that, like, AI is bad. I just remember, like, some of your other experiments that you've done over the years have included following the rules of the Bible. And that was sort of at a time when people were talking about taking the Bible very literally. And I knew that part of why you were doing this was like a kind of attempt to, like, say, well.
- [49:03]
Casey Newton
Here'S what would happen if you just.
- [49:05]
Kevin Roose
Went all the way toward your stated belief, sort of. There was sort of a point in there about the dangers of literalism. Were you trying to make a similar point about the dangers of AI here?
- [49:13]
AJ Jacobs
I did not go in with an ax to grind on this one. It was more the thesis as, where is AI hiding? Because I don't believe AI is all good or all bad. I didn't believe that before, and I don't believe it now. I think in some cases, it's awful. Thank God that machine learning checks whether there's credit card fraud, but on the other hand, it has huge risks and has divided our country. So I was not coming in saying it's all good or all bad. Just where is it? And also, any lessons can I learn from spending two days without it?
- [49:52]
Casey Newton
So let's get into the experiment. I feel like the biggest choice you had to make at the outset was, how am I going to define what counts as AI? And you decided to include machine learning. Talk to us a bit about kind of how you set the boundaries for how you were going to run this thing.
- [50:09]
AJ Jacobs
Right. All the experts I Talked to said AI is a big umbrella and you've got generative AI like ChatGPT, and that's getting all the heat now. But AI has been around for decades because the umbrella also covers machine learning. It basically covers these machines that can evolve, that can look at new data and change. The way I explained it in a paragraph that was cut was that. I see.
- [50:40]
Casey Newton
This is why I love freelance writers. They harbor so many grudges and it's great to be able to have a podcast to air them out. I bet you had a better idea for the headline too, didn't you, A.J.
- [50:50]
AJ Jacobs
I know. What is this crap? No, he was lifeful. It was just a matter of space. But I, I said traditional programs are input A yields output B, whereas machine learning is more like a recipe that changes. So you have a recipe, but then there's data that comes in and the recipe says, oh, people really like sugar. I'm going to add sugar. So it evolves. And the reason I thought it was important to put the both in is because I feel they both have. Have this great potential and great risk. They both have these unintended consequences. When you have machines that can change and you can't predict what they're going to do. That is, as I said, sometimes wonderful. Sometimes you end up with YouTube algorithms that turn us all into flat earthers.
- [51:45]
Kevin Roose
Right. So let's talk about some of the things you did on this experiment. My sort of characterization of this up top would be that you had to basically become Amish for 48 hours. You were.
- [51:57]
AJ Jacobs
That was a line again.
- [51:59]
Casey Newton
Did that also get cut out of.
- [52:00]
AJ Jacobs
The story that was in there? I said Amish cosplay was one. Or Laura Engel Wilder. I was another comparison. Yes, because pretty much anything that's electric or electronic includes machine learning, including electricity itself. Because Con Edison used to uses tons of machine learning to figure out where is the demand going to be. So yeah, I had to go Amish. I did have a solar powered generator so I could plug in a lamp for a while. But yeah, it started the moment I woke up. My iPhone uses facial recognition. That's AI. But even the goes further than that. You know, the iPhone camera uses AI. The Gmail uses machine learning even without the new AI features of Google and and water. That was a surprise because the New York reservoir system uses machine learning to help. They want to make clear that humans make the final decisions because they don't want people to freak out. But the machine learning helps them figure out where is the demand and when should we make repairs.
- [53:08]
Casey Newton
Well, so how did you stay hydrated for two days?
- [53:10]
AJ Jacobs
Well, I did plan ahead, which maybe was a little bit of cheating, but I. I put a bowl out or several bowls on my windowsill in the weeks before to collect rainwater. And I didn't get giardia or anything, so I feel lucky.
- [53:25]
Casey Newton
How much rainwater were you able to collect before you started the experiment?
- [53:28]
AJ Jacobs
Well, that's why I had several bowls and it was weeks, so, yeah, it was not ideal. It was not ideal.
- [53:35]
Kevin Roose
So there's another piece of this experiment that I wanted to ask you about, which is that you had to forage for a meal in Central Park. Now, I was not under the impression that food itself was generated by AI, but what am I missing here?
- [53:50]
AJ Jacobs
Well, of course, it all depends how you define it. I mean, food is really intertwined with AI. Industrial farms use AI and machine learning for figuring out whether to water the crops, when to plant them. Food is, of course, shipped along the supply chain, which is AI optimized. So if I'm being really strict, which of course, I. I was. I was like, well, maybe I can't eat anything from the grocery. So to be super safe, I found a video on where a man named Wild Man, Steve Brill is his name, and he teaches you how to find edible food in Central Park. So I took him up on that and I went foraging and I got some, what are called plantain weeds in Central park, which I ate. And. And. Not great. Not great. They taste like dirt. But they didn't kill me. They didn't kill me.
- [54:46]
Casey Newton
That's that park to table cuisine that is so popular in New York these days. They're so ahead of the curve over there.
- [54:52]
Kevin Roose
I ate some plantain weeds from a guy in Central park once, and I saw the Fifth dimension.
- [55:00]
Casey Newton
That's right. I've seen all those plantain weed dispensaries that are popping up all over the city lately. Now, Kevin, as AJ Is describing his experience of depriving himself of so much AI and so much technology, I'm wondering how that lands on you, because I think if I were to come to you and to say, hey, all, like, generative AI services are going to be down for the next 10 minutes, I think, you know, your heart would seize up, you start having palpitations, I'd see a cold sweat running down your forehead. So was this a challenging story for you to read?
- [55:30]
Kevin Roose
You know, it was. And I was thinking, how would I do at this? And then I was thinking, I would probably. This would probably be good for me. I should probably do this like every couple months. I should do 48 hours of no technology at all.
- [55:44]
Casey Newton
I mean, we've talked on the show. You've gotten to the point where you'll, you'll put your phone in a prison, you know, overnight if you feel like you're developing too strong of an attachment to it. But you know, at the same time, I have never seen you run an experiment quite like this.
- [55:56]
Kevin Roose
Yeah, this is true. I have taken breaks from technology. I was, there was a period where I was doing this like digital Sabbath thing where like one day a week I would try not to use my phone or send any emails, but that was too hard, so I quit that. But did this experiment. We should continue talking about this experiment because I want to get to the takeaways here. So you have this 48 hour period where you're not using AI and then like, what is your emotion upon reaching the end of this period and being able to use this stuff again?
- [56:26]
AJ Jacobs
Well, I've, I had a lot of mixed emotions. I mean, on the one hand there was relief of being cut off, like you've talked about at the digital detox. There was also annoyance. I mean, it is super annoying to try to, you know, you can't Google, you can't Google like my Encyclopedia Britannica is not up to date. On the other hand, it was terrifying. That was another feeling I had because I realized how omnipresent AI is. And as I've said, it's not all bad, but it has these huge risks. So it was really a mixture of emotions, motions, which maybe is the right way to react to AI. It's not a monolith, it's not black and white. It's super confusing.
- [57:14]
Casey Newton
How much easier would this experiment have been if you had limited it to generative AI? If you said, okay, machine learning is fine, that's like pretty well just kind of integrated into all services as you, you know, reported out here. But what if you just sort of said, well, I'm not going to use ChatGPT and other sort of generative AI services services.
- [57:34]
AJ Jacobs
I think it would have been easier. For now, in five years, I think that line will be erased. I also think it would have been hard to research because I, as I confess in the article, I used a ton of chatgpt to research this article and that was another takeaway was how to use ChatGPT. Because ChatGPT sensed the thesis of my article. It knew I wanted to find machine learning and AI everywhere. So it was like serving me up these half truths. And I had to give it some tough love and say chatgpt, pretend I've got the opposite thesis. I don't want AI and ML to be anywhere. Tell me now what are the reliable sources? Because, yeah, as you know, it's just, you know, an obsequious machine.
- [58:26]
Kevin Roose
Yeah. I mean, I think if there's one takeaway from your piece for, for me, it's that like the, the line between sort of classical AI or machine learning and generative AI is like thin and getting thinner. Right. These, right now people are very angry at generative AI. They say, oh, it takes all this electricity, it uses all this water. These companies are sort of foisting it onto us. So I think there will be people who read this article and say, well, he's, he's making sort of this inevitable list argument that like there's nothing we can do and we like live in this world and it's, you know, it's too late to sort of turn back the tide. And I think what I came away feeling from your article was that, yeah, in five years the sort of difference between generative AI and classical AI may be so small as to be invisible. And we will just sort of think of this stuff as being on a continuum that starts with like Netflix recommendations and image recognition and self driving cars and like ghosts through chatbots and all that other stuff.
- [59:27]
Casey Newton
Well, I mean there's like an old joke in the tech industry that AI is just whatever we call whatever the computer can't do yet.
- [59:33]
Kevin Roose
Right.
- [59:33]
Casey Newton
Like we've just sort of been on this like advancing frontier forever and yeah, it keeps being able to do more stuff.
- [59:39]
AJ Jacobs
Right. Can I just add one thing about the inevitableist part? Because I don't want that to be the takeaway. I don't want people to give up. I feel we need more transparency. I love the law that you were talking about, the California law about watermarking AI images. We need more transparency on what's AI and what is AI generated. I'm in favor of more regulation. I mean, it is such a powerful technology and I also want more control over my algorithms. I hate that Facebook has so much control. Maybe there's a way to go in and make it show me articles that I disagree with. Maybe, but it would take me days to figure out it out. So there are things we could do. It's not inevitable. We got to take action because we are somewhat in control of where AI and ML are going to take us.
- [60:33]
Kevin Roose
I mean, I, I guess I'm curious what you think, aj as Someone who has spent a lot of time thinking and writing about religion as well as AI, how far that comparison holds? Because I often tell people that being in San Francisco, in the AI world in 2025 feels a little like being in the Protestant Reformation. You know, you've got cults and these groups and these people, you know, handing out pamphlets declaring that the end is near and trying to recruit you to their movement. And it just feels like kind of this great blossoming of these ideas about the future and the end of the world. I also know that, like, the last time we had a big industrial revolution, there were, like, a lot of weird cults and utopian communities and sort of people who opted out of the new technology. I'm curious, like, I understand this was a sort of a joke or a stunt or a piece meant to illuminate some larger point, but I'm wondering if you think there will be people who actually choose to live like this because they will just see all of this AI and instead of having the reaction that you had, which is like, I want to dive in and, like, investigate this, they will just be like, screw it, I'm out. I'm going to my haven in the woods and I'm going to turn off all my devices and I'm going to live like it's 18.
- [61:51]
AJ Jacobs
Yeah, I think you will have that. You will have some. A big Luddite movement. And I can understand it because it is scary. As to the religion metaphor, I think it's a good one. I think there is a lot of overlap and this sense of this destiny that AI is destined to create heaven on earth or even replace us. I would say one difference between, between religion and science is the idea that science can be falsified. So my hope is that people in the AI industry keep an open mind and look for falsification. Look for examples of where AI is actually not doing good and trying to adjust to that so that it doesn't become a religion.
- [62:44]
Kevin Roose
Well, aj, thanks so much for coming. Thanks for doing this experiment. The piece is called 48 hours without AI and you can read it at the New York Times.
- [62:50]
Casey Newton
Very scary story to read on Halloween.
- [62:53]
AJ Jacobs
Oh, good point.
- [63:20]
Sponsor/Advertisement Voice
As a small business owner, you don't have the luxury of clocking out early. Your business is on your mind 24 7. So when you're hiring, you need a partner that works just as hard as you do. That hiring partner is LinkedIn Jobs. When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in. LinkedIn makes it easy to post your job for free. Share it with your network and get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. Post your job LinkedIn's new feature can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people with deep candidate insights. Either post your job for free or pay to promote promoted jobs. Get three times more qualified applicants. At the end of the day, the most important thing to your small business is the quality of candidates, and with LinkedIn you can feel confident that you're getting the best. Find out why more than 2.5 million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next great hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at LinkedIn.com hardfork that's LinkedIn.com hardfork to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.
- [64:20]
With real world experience across a range of industries, Deloitte helps recognize how a breakthrough in aerospace might ripple into healthcare, how an innovation in agriculture could trickle into retail or biotech or even manufacturing. Is it clairvoyance? Hardly. It's what happens when experienced multidisciplinary teams and innovative tech come together to offer clients bold new approaches to address their unique challenges, helping them confidently navigate what's next. Deloitte together makes progress.
- [64:57]
Casey Newton
Hard Fork is produced by Rachel Cohn and Whitney Jones were edited by Jen Poyag. This episode was Fact checked by one Will Peichel and was engineered by Katie McMurray. Original music by Marion Lozano, Rowan Nimasso and Dan Powell. Video production by Sawyer Roque, Pat Gunther and Chris Schott. You can watch this whole episode on YouTube@YouTube.com hardfork Special thanks to Paula Schumann, Huiwing Tam, Dahlia Haddad and Jeffrey Miranda. You can email us@hardforkytimes.com with the error you you found on your Brockipedia page.
- [65:57]
Kevin Roose
This episode is sponsored by Morgan Stanley's Thoughts on the Market. Today's financial markets move fast. Morgan Stanley moves faster with their daily podcast Thoughts on the Market. Thoughts on the Market covers daily trends across the global investment landscape with actionable insights from Morgan Stanley's leading economists and strategists. And with most episodes under five minutes long, staying informed has never been easier. Listen and subscribe to Thoughts on the Market wherever you get your podcasts.