Loading summary
Asana Ad
Asana is the number one AI work management platform. It's where work connects to company goals so your entire organization can move forward faster. Try for free today@asana.com you know there's another HBR podcast you might like Coaching Real Leaders takes you inside real life leadership coaching Sessions. Host Muriel Wilkins has advised CEOs for nearly 20 years. Listen in as she helps guests work through their hardest career challenges. Find new episodes of Coaching Real Leaders wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to HBR on leadership case studies and conversations with the world's top business and management experts hand selected to help you unlock the best in those around you. Here's a tough question. Should businesses take a stand for or against particular societal issues? And if you're a leader, what's the best way to determine when and how to engage on potentially controversial but important matters? In this episode, Harvard Business School senior lecturer Hubert Joly discusses examples of corporate leaders who determined whether and how to engage with humanitarian crises, geopolitical conflict, racial justice, climate change, and more. Jolie wrote a case study based on his own time as chairman and CEO of electronics retailer Best Buy. When George Floyd was murdered In Minneapolis in 2020, just a few miles from their global headquarters, Jolie led the organization through weeks of unrest and protests in their community and within the firm. He'll talk about why CEOs can't afford to just ignore these issues, and you'll learn how to create a process for decision making around societal issues in collaboration with your board. If you're a leader who cares about your organization's role in its community and the world at large, this episode is for you. It originally aired on cold call in January 2024. Here it is.
Brian Kenny
In case you've ever thought about becoming a CEO, your job description might include things like work with the board of directors to set goals for the firm, oversee finances, manage the entire operation and ensure compliance with laws and regulations, negotiate big deals like mergers and acquisitions. And if it's a public company, you'd have to do quarterly earnings and of course generate profits. All of these would be pretty standard parts of your job, not explicitly mentioned, but definitely expected. These days would also be something like wade into fraught social issues that seemingly have nothing to do with your day to day business and could potentially put you in the center of a political tsunami. Good luck with that. Today on Cold Call, we welcome Professor Hubert Joly to discuss the case deciding when to engage on societal issues. I'm your host Brian Kenny, and you're listening to Cold Call on the HBR Podcast Network. Hubert Joly is a senior lecturer at Harvard Business School and the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Best Buy. He is also the author of the Heart of Business Leadership Principles for the Next Era of Capitalism, and he is a repeat customer on Cold Call. Welcome, Hubert.
Hubert Joly
Well, thank you for having me, Brian. I look forward to our conversation.
Brian Kenny
Great to have you back. And I really enjoyed reading this case. So thank you for writing it and thank you for coming on to talk about it. Let me ask you to start just by telling us what's the central issue in the case and what's your cold call when you start the discussion in class?
Hubert Joly
The central issue is, of course, when and how to engage on some of these potentially controversial but important societal issues, knowing that doing nothing, ignoring these issues can be very dangerous and engaging can be also risky. And so maybe the cold call is what criteria would you use to decide when and how to engage?
Brian Kenny
So I do want to ask you about, a little bit later in the conversation, whether you've had to toe this line before. Before we get there, let me just ask you why you decided to write the case and how does it factor into the kinds of things that you're thinking about As a. At Harvard Business School, my focus is.
Hubert Joly
Leadership matters, either supporting CEOs or senior leaders in executive education or of course, future leaders in the MBA program. And as you indicated, Brian, this is a new field, a field where, you know, landmines have been dropped. And so this is new territory. And in many ways, CEOs leaders have not been prepared. Right. When they went to school 20 or 30 years ago, it was not quite the same. So writing this case provide the opportunity to review a number of instances where CEOs decide to engage with, of course, varying results. And of course, in the Socratic method that we love at HBS and also love Aristotle, you start from reality and you try to derive some principles. Again, you cannot ignore these facts. You might as well engage in this matter.
Brian Kenny
Yeah, yeah. And it's unlike other Harvard Business School cases to the extent that it's not really a narrative. There's not like a one continuous story here. This is just like many chapters of the situation, and you lay it out beautifully and just very factual form. So I thought it was an interesting departure. There's been a lot of discussion for decades, certainly about what the role of the firm is. What's the purpose of the firm. I want to just ask you, what do you see as the purpose of the firm in that? What's the role of the CEO.
Hubert Joly
Of course, we all remember on September 13, 1970, certain Milton Friedman wrote this impactful article about the role of the firm. He forcefully said, very forcefully, and of course, there was a context around this, but that the sole purpose of the company was to maximize shareholder value. And in fact, he introduced a hiatus in the history of capitalism, because before Milton Friedman, going back to the 19th centuries, companies had engaged on societal matters. They felt that they had a bigger role to play and that they were there to serve the common good and take care of different stakeholders, starting with their employees, but also the community. And so for a while, all of us were educated, right. Including at this wonderful school about. I remember when I was at McKinsey, this was what we were working on, optimizing performance.
Brian Kenny
Yeah.
Hubert Joly
Now, we, of course, know that this is not valid. I'll take a very concrete example from my personal life. In May of 2020, when George Floyd was murdered in Minneapolis, and it was still at Best Buy at the time, which is headquartered in Minneapolis, of course, the city was on fire. When the city's on fire, cannot open your stores. To quote colleague Rebecca Anderson, who wrote about this, if the planet is on fire, you don't have a business. So I think what we need is a declaration of interdependence and then go back to some principles around. At the minimum, as firms, we need a license to operate and we need to serve the common goods. Over time, it's also the opportunity to address some of the most pressing issues in the world. So I'm a big believer, to my opinion, shared by many, that the purpose of the firm is to do something good in the world, and you can do well by doing good.
Brian Kenny
So if the purpose of the firm has changed over time and evolved in the way that you described, then clearly the role of the CEO has also changed and evolve. What has changed in the world to drive that?
Hubert Joly
Well, it's changing expectations. Right. And Edelman has published some statistics recently. Roughly speaking, about 2/3 of employees expect companies to play a role on societal matters. Two thirds of customers expect and prefer to deal with companies that they can connect with. And about 90% of investors take into account environmental matters and societal matters, not for political reasons. It's because these factors have an impact on business. As an example, if you're an insurance company, Brian, do you think that climate change is going to have an impact on your loss ratio? Of course it will be.
Brian Kenny
Of course.
Hubert Joly
And if we have a society where more and more people are excluded and don't have the opportunity to get Insurance. At the end of the day, maybe just you and I are going to be insured, which is not going to be a good way to diversify risk. We've written a case about French insurance company AXA on this and they've had to lead a refoundation of their business around some of these trends.
Brian Kenny
When you were CEO of Best Buy, I'm wondering if there were issues that you felt were important to weighed in on. And I would ask that in the context of you as the CEO of the firm or you personally, Jolie, were there things that you thought were important to take a position on?
Hubert Joly
An important distinction? For the most part, I think that why the CEO in many cases may be the spokesperson. He or she is going to speak on behalf of the firm. And so we'll go back to this because I think there's a major learning from looking at these cases is that you need a set of criteria, you need a process, you need capabilities to be able to decide when and how to engage. It cannot be just left in general to just the CEO. But to answer your question, at Best buy, back in 2012, in fact, I was still the CEO of Carson Companies, another great Minnesota company, an issue in the state. It was going to be a referendum on whether or not to include in the state constitution the fact that a marriage was between people from two different sexes. And we had to decide. And I this was the first time I had to wrestle with this. My wrestling was genie. This can be a religious matter, can be a very personal matter. To what extent as a company do we have the moral authority to weigh in on this? Right. And we discussed it at the board and in the end a number of us took personal positions in the state on that, but not a position as a company. Later on I changed my perspective and I said no, there's also a company matter, which is we need to take care of our employees and we need to make sure that our great state is attractive to talent. So you see how my thinking evolved in the perspective later on at Best Buy, we had to deal with, and it's again very current today about the Dreamers. And we joined a coalition of companies that expressed our views that these Dreamers who were here through no fault of their own, who were contributing to the economy, there were students, there were workers, we had many Dreamers as employees of Best Buy should be protected and acting as a group was helpful. Then later on we had to deal with the question of tension with China. As you remember, President Trump was introducing increasingly high tariffs with China So we actually worked with this administration and him, trying to educate him on the impact that this could have. Of course, I'm on boards of number of companies and we deal with these matters of an increasing complexity. So yes, as a CEO, you just can't ignore this stuff.
Brian Kenny
God, it's like the last job I would want, the way you're describing it. But it also, I think it shows that that companies, no, firms can no longer operate in isolation. You exist in a context. You exist in a global supply chain. You have employees who are also people who have lives and they have positions on things. So it's a very, very complicated and difficult line to navigate, I guess, is that fair to say complicated?
Hubert Joly
Which is why I think ahead of any crisis and we've seen and I've encouraged companies to do this, and leaders need to develop a framework for deciding how and when to engage at the highest level. How does it fit with your purpose as a company? How does it fit with your values and how does it impact your stakeholders? These are important criteria. So to take examples of applying this, if you're Microsoft, gun control is not going to be really an issue for you. You're not involved in selling guns, or you don't really have a say on this. You're not particularly competent or legitimate on this matter. But immigration is going to be a big deal because a lot of your workers, including your CEO, are immigrants and it's essential to your business. In contrast, Walmart or Doug McMillan there guns is a big deal. He sells guns. He's had stores and employees attacked on a number of occasions with guns. And so this is something that he may decide to get involved in.
Brian Kenny
Yeah.
Hubert Joly
And so the first thing is what is your set of criteria? And then within your firm, what is the process? Who are you going to engage? Who are you going to consult if something happened? What are the resources, internal or external resources? You probably need to build external capabilities as well, because, Brian, the case illustrates this. The range of topics that you may want to and have to engage in is incredibly broad. Right from the Uyghurs in China to abortion to voting rights and immigration. And there's no way as a CEO you can be competent on all of these matters. And you have to understand the options you have, the implications. How are you going to get engaged? Are you going to say something? Are you going to do something? Are you going to be doing this in isolation, just on your own, as a member of coalition or through maybe industry groups? These are all important choices. And usually you don't have that much time to react, right?
Brian Kenny
Of course not.
Hubert Joly
Be prepared.
Brian Kenny
Yeah, yeah. So is there an option to just do nothing? Is that one of the options that's on the table?
Hubert Joly
Certainly not. At least it's very risky. Bob Chapek, when he became CEO of Disney, declared that unlike his predecessor, Bob Iger, he would stay away from these issues. That's not really the business that Disney is in. But of course, when the so called Don Se gay bill was introduced in Florida after he decided to say nothing, a lot of his employees, including also one of the heirs of the Disney family, revolted and put pressure on him. So then he was on the back foot. So saying nothing can be very dangerous. Your employees. A key responsibility as leaders we have is those who are in our care. And about these societal matters, we have to be careful. We're not elected officials. We're not competent necessarily on all of these matters. But we do have our employees and that's the first place to think about, you know, when they're under attack or it's an issue that they care about.
Asana Ad
Asana is where work connects. It's where projects, teams and company goals are seamlessly intertwined with AI to propel your organization towards shared success. See why they're the number one AI work management platform? Try for free today@asana.com that's asana.com.
Hubert Joly
I.
Brian Kenny
Also thought it was interesting. The case highlighted a couple of situations involving Starbucks. The first being that they had taken a stance on diversity by encouraging their employees to write a particular sentiment on the cup. You know, they're famous for writing things on the cups and you know, that had mixed reactions from people. A few years later they had a situation in one of their stores where there was an incident that certainly seemed to be racially motivated where two African American men were sitting and they hadn't ordered anything. People might remember this and the employee asked them to leave and it really blew up into just a huge deal for Starbucks where they had to retrain the entire company. So that to me is a great illustration of careful what stance you take and, and then when you take it, make sure that your community, your firm, your employees are along for the ride with you and understand what you're doing.
Hubert Joly
Such an important point, Brian, because in the criteria about when and how to engage, we talked about relevancy around your purpose, your values, your stakeholders. But another criteria is authenticity. One of the things I learned from my mother, but I don't know if you're your mother, but my mother told me, son, before you criticize others, look inside, look inward. Right.
Brian Kenny
She didn't say it so kindly to me, but, yeah, she had the same sentiment.
Hubert Joly
Yeah. Right. And so another case that we have at the school is about Nike and the Colin Kaepernick case. And of course, Nike, you know, when Colin Kaepernick was taking the knee, supported their black African American athletes because, you know, they're part of the family. That's how, in many ways, Nike has grown. But then it backfired, notably because it was then realized that internally, Nike was not such a diverse organization. For me, in this increasingly volatile, divisive environment, one of the reflections in the classroom can be revisit the balance between saying something and doing something, and revisiting the balance between looking outside and looking inside. I think that the first priority should be doing something inside so that you take care of those in your care before you teach lessons. On the other hand, there's cases where it's actually relevant, inappropriate and effective to speak up. And you have to think about the leverage you have and the risk you take from that standpoint.
Brian Kenny
I was going to ask you about that. Like, what's the political calculation that a CEO has to go through when they're deciding whether or not to weigh in on something and who do they have to check with? I mean, do they have to go to the board? Is it something that they really have to. Because you said time's of the essence.
Hubert Joly
Here, many questions here. So having an internal process and as the CEO of people you can go to. I know that Jeff Hareding, the CEO of General Mills, we have another case on this following George Floyd, because, of course, John Mills is headquartered in Minneapolis. The first people he called were some of his black executives and the Black Employee Resource Group to check in with them and see how they felt and then what advice they might have on this. So that's an important consideration. Now, Ken Frazier, following the incident in Charlottesville, where, as you may remember, following demonstrations, the president said that there was good people on both sides, including white supremacists and the other side. And Ken Frazer, the CEO of Merck, who was African American and who was at the time with many other CEOs and one of the President's Advisory Council, decided to step down from that council and spoke up. He had the support of his board, but he didn't take much time. He felt that this was such an important issue to the values of his company that they had to engage a number of criteria to shed some light on this. First, you always have to stay true to your values. Right. In these difficult moments, staying true to your true north, your values, which is what Ken Fraser did, but also looking at your leverage and the risk you're taking. So if you're a consumer brand like Bud Light or Target, the risk of retaliation is higher than if you're a B2B business. So JP Morgan, Jamie Dimon, who's like the godfather of capitalism in this country following some hate crimes against Asian individuals, really spoke up and spoke his mind against racism. And so many people look up to Jamie, and it's harder to retaliate against JP Morgan compared to orchestrating a boycott of Bud Light. These are considerations to take into account as well.
Brian Kenny
You know, much of the backlash against CEOs who take positions on these things seems politically motivated. I think that's probably a classic understatement. Does a CEO need to explain to that group why they're doing this, or do you just ignore that and say, you know what, we're taking a position, here's why we're doing it, and we feel good about it.
Hubert Joly
So first, communication priority. You had communication, Brian. Right. For this great institution is internal.
Brian Kenny
Yeah.
Hubert Joly
Last year we had Roe v. Wade being overturned. And by the way, that is subject on which companies should take a public stance. This is the highest court in the land that has decided, what impact is this going to have? What good is it going to do? But certainly having a conversation with your employees. And by the way, another lesson is be proactive ahead of time, identifying the issues that are likely to be on the horizon and impact your company. And start planning for this. Don't wait, otherwise you're going to be on the back foot. But many companies, because of this planning, had already introduced provisions in their health care plans to enable employees to travel across state lines to get healthcare, which was a way to assist their employees. But then internally, have a conversation, have a conversation with a diversity of your employees. Because now, who says that the 125,000 employees of Best Buy are just from one camp? Right. We have employees in all states, all walks in life. And one of the new employee resource group you should probably create that did not exist historically is conservatives. They are an equally valuable member of the organization and engage them in the dialogue and try to listen. One of the great attributes of great CEOs these days is two ears and one mouth. And they should start by listening, of course, listening to their heart, but also listening to those around them, listening to those who are competent on these matters and try to do their best. Again, that means oftentimes being guided by their values and what they believe is the right thing to do.
Brian Kenny
Yeah. You mentioned earlier in our discussion that the majority of people expect CEOs to take a position on some of these issues. I think we also know that millennials care a lot about the companies that they buy products from, and they really care about the companies that they work for. And they want those companies to stand for something. I'm just wondering, as a CEO, is this something that you look at as a brand enhancing choice that you make to affirm for your employees that we do stand for something, and that's where.
Hubert Joly
You need to be authentic. And you know, you and I have talked about this before, Brian. That's where purpose comes to the forefront. What is the good you're trying to create in the world and what are your key values? If you're centered around that, and of course, if the strategy and performance is derived from that. Right. So it cannot be made up and separate from the business, then it makes a big difference, then it's going to be authentic. So at Best Buy, our purpose is to enrich lives through technology by addressing key human needs. And it's a very human culture. At Ralph Lauren, where I'm on the board, it's to inspire the dream of a better life through authenticity and timeless style. And of course, one implication of that is that of course you're going to have a diverse organization, inclusive organization, where everybody can feel the belong. And then when something happened, you know what your true north is. So Corey Barry, who was the CEO of Best Buy, my successor when George Floyd was murdered, our reaction to this was, we can do better. Right. And we had been engaged at Best Buy for a number of years on trying to enhance our environment and create a more inclusive environment, more diverse environment. We've made great progress. But Earthsense was, you know, we can do better. That started with what to do at Best Buy, and that started also what kind of coalition can be mounted at the state level, because in the great state of Minnesota, and from my accent, you can tell that's where I'm from. There's a number of great companies and working with the governor, you can try to make a difference here. So if you're guided by purpose and values, then good things happen.
Brian Kenny
We've seen recently, really within the last year, I would say kind of a backlash against esg, environmental sustainability and governance, which is something that we talk a lot about at Harvard Business School. There's a lot of cases we've had them on cold call, you know, about Firms and investment companies that are focused on esg. And now all of a sudden, there's this pushback against that, and it's this chorus that we're hearing is business should be focused on business and not social issues. What would you say to somebody who throws that at you?
Hubert Joly
A number of words and concepts have become toxic and weaponized. ESG is one of these. DENI is another one. I learned from a great colleague, Francis Fry, that once a concept or vocabulary is weaponized, you stopped using it, but you continue to do what's right. Is incorporating external factors from all of your stakeholders important to develop a strategy? Yes, yes, yes. And that includes, of course, your employees, your customers, your vendors, you know, the communities in which you operate and the planet. And of course, you know, you need to take this into account to generate great economic performance over time. You know, again, if the planet is on fire, you're not going to have a business. So if you're an apparel company like Ralph Lauren, taking care of the factories in Asia, and you know what happens there, we all remember Ralph Lauren was not involved in that. But the fire in a number of plants or factories in Bangladesh a few years ago, they're not owned by Target or Ralph Lauren or Levi Strauss, these factories, but we source from them. So making sure that you look at that there's no child labor, that there's safety and good working conditions in these factories first, it's the right moral thing to do. But also, the consumers are going to go after your throat if you don't take care of that. Again, ignore these factors at your great peril.
Brian Kenny
Yeah, Hubert, this has been a great conversation, as I expected it would be. And I usually end by asking my guests, if there's one thing you want people to remember about the case, what would it be? I'm going to ask that a little bit differently to you today. And that is, if you were sitting down with a friend who was looking at a CEO position and they were sort of equivocating about, should I take this job, should I not? What advice would you give them?
Hubert Joly
Well, I would say this is an increasingly challenging world. Don't expect the job to be fun every day. At the same time, if your inner purpose is to make a difference in the world, it is not about power thing, glory or money. If it's something about making a difference in the world, companies now have the opportunity and the duty to make a big difference in the world and can contribute to solving some of our most pressing issues in the world. And I think 10 years from now, 20 years from now, maybe you'll look at this time and you'll say, this was our finest hour. And so a lot of the conversation with CEOs and aspiring CEOs is that these can be great leadership moments. And if you're interested in pursuing that, you better take care of yourself. Right? Because you know to take care of others. Remember, when we're flying, we're told if the oxygen masks come down, put them on yourself first before you help others. So you're going to need to take care of yourself so that you have the inner strengths and the moral compass and network around you to help you do a job that's increasingly difficult.
Brian Kenny
Clearly, Brian, that is great advice from somebody who's been there. Hubert Jolie, thank you for joining me on Cold Call.
Hubert Joly
Thank you, Brian.
Asana Ad
That was Harvard Business School senior lecturer Hubert Joly in conversation with Brian Kenny on Cold Call. He's also the former chairman and CEO of Best Buy. We'll be back next Wednesday with another handpicked conversation about leadership from the Harvard Business Review. If you found this episode helpful, share it with your friends and colleagues and follow our show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. While you're there, be sure to leave us a review. And when you're ready for more podcasts, articles can case studies, books and videos with the world's top business and management experts. You'll find it all@hbr.org this episode was produced by Ann Sanney and me, Hannah Bates. Ian Fox is our editor. Music by Coma Media. Special thanks to Maureen Hoch, Erica Truxler, Ramsey Kabaz, Nicole Smith, Anne Bartholomew and you, our listeners. See you next week.
HBR On Leadership: Episode Summary
Episode: Should Your Business Take a Stand on Societal Issues?
Release Date: October 30, 2024
In this compelling episode of HBR On Leadership, hosted by Harvard Business Review, senior lecturer Hubert Joly delves into the critical question facing modern businesses: Should your company take a stand on societal issues? Drawing from his experiences as the former CEO of Best Buy and insights from various case studies, Joly explores the complexities leaders face when navigating humanitarian crises, geopolitical conflicts, racial justice, climate change, and more.
The conversation begins with Brian Kenny highlighting the expanded responsibilities of today's CEOs. Beyond traditional roles—such as overseeing finances and ensuring compliance—modern leaders are increasingly expected to address complex social issues. Hubert Joly emphasizes that "doing nothing, ignoring these issues can be very dangerous and engaging can also be risky" (03:41).
Joly argues that the purpose of a firm has shifted from solely maximizing shareholder value, as advocated by Milton Friedman in 1970, to encompassing a broader responsibility towards society. He states, "the purpose of the firm is to do something good in the world, and you can do well by doing good" (06:13).
A significant portion of the discussion revolves around establishing a framework for when and how businesses should engage with societal issues. Joly suggests that CEOs should develop a set of criteria considering the company's purpose, values, and stakeholder impact. He outlines essential questions such as:
He illustrates this with the example of Microsoft focusing on immigration due to its direct impact on their workforce, while Walmart might engage in gun control debates due to the nature of their products and associated risks (11:42).
Drawing from his tenure at Best Buy, Joly recounts how the company responded to George Floyd's murder in Minneapolis in 2020. The incident, occurring near Best Buy's headquarters, forced the organization to navigate community unrest and internal protests. Joly underscores the necessity for CEOs to "develop a framework for deciding when and how to engage at the highest level" (12:35).
Kenny references Starbucks' attempt to promote diversity by encouraging employees to write sentiments on cups. While well-intentioned, a subsequent incident involving racial prejudice led to significant backlash and necessitated company-wide retraining. Joly uses this to highlight the importance of ensuring that any public stance is supported internally and that employees understand and align with the company's actions (14:00).
Joly discusses Nike's support for Colin Kaepernick, which, while enhancing the brand's image among certain consumers, exposed internal disparities in diversity and inclusion. This example emphasizes the delicate balance between external activism and internal company culture (15:03).
Citing Jeff Hareding of General Mills and Ken Frazier of Merck, Joly illustrates how leaders can effectively engage on societal matters by consulting diverse employee groups and aligning actions with core company values. Frazier's decisive stand against the Charlottesville incident, supported by his board, exemplifies proactive and authentic leadership (16:18).
Authenticity emerges as a cornerstone for effective corporate engagement. Joly stresses that a company's actions must stem from genuine values and a clear sense of purpose. He notes, "if you're centered around that, and of course, if the strategy and performance is derived from that... it's going to be authentic" (20:25). By maintaining an authentic stance, companies like Best Buy and Ralph Lauren ensure their initiatives are both meaningful and aligned with their long-term goals.
Effective communication is paramount when taking a stand on societal issues. Joly advocates for:
He highlights the importance of listening, stating, "the first priority should be doing something inside so that you take care of those in your care before you teach lessons" (15:06).
Addressing the potential for backlash, Joly advises companies to remain steadfast and authentic. He recounts how Bob Chapek's decision to avoid taking a stance on certain issues led to internal dissent and public pressure, demonstrating the risks of inaction. Conversely, he cites Jamie Dimon's leadership at JP Morgan, where taking a stand against racism enhanced the company's reputation without significant negative repercussions due to the company's established credibility (18:04).
In concluding the discussion, Joly offers invaluable advice to aspiring CEOs contemplating the challenging landscape of modern leadership:
He encourages future leaders to view their roles as opportunities to address pressing global challenges, emphasizing that "companies now have the opportunity and the duty to make a big difference in the world" (24:01).
Hubert Joly's insightful discussion on HBR On Leadership underscores the imperative for modern businesses to actively engage with societal issues. By establishing clear criteria, maintaining authenticity, and fostering inclusive communication, CEOs can navigate the intricate landscape of social responsibility. This episode serves as a crucial guide for leaders aiming to balance profitability with meaningful societal impact, ultimately reinforcing the evolving essence of leadership in today's interconnected world.
This summary encapsulates the comprehensive discussion between Brian Kenny and Hubert Joly, offering valuable insights for current and future leaders on the intricate balance between business objectives and societal responsibilities.