B (3:18)

Let's talk about line two here. So relating to Ghislaine Maxwell, her flight and travel records and third party references or names in the investigation, what stands out to you in that second line of what might be revealed?

A (3:31)

Right. That third party thing is really interesting because typically the Justice Department, look, if we're not gonna charge you, if we're not gonna accuse you of a crime, we're not gonna name you because you don't wanna create a situation where somebody has to defend themselves against something they haven't been charged with. And I think you're already seeing some of the fallout of some individuals whose names have come out, but who is still communicating with him and over what. And what connections was he making that would be interesting to see up until at least that 2019 time period. And if there's been any investigative steps that have taken place since then would be interesting.

B (4:02)

So conversely, when you're revealing names, possibly of folks that haven't been says DOJ is permitted to withhold certain information, such as the personal information of victims and materials that would jeopardize an active federal investigation. What stands out to you with that?

A (4:18)

That, to me is the most consequential line in the law as it pertains to the developments we've seen over the last 48 to 72 hours. So back in July, the Justice Department, the FBI, they put out an unsigned, undated memo and they said, look, there's nothing here. We've reviewed all these files. There's no client list. And there's a key line where they say, we don't even have enough new information or enough evidence to even open an investigation, let alone charge anybody, as a result of our review of all the documents. So flash forward to Friday and you've got Trump saying on Truth Social, look, I want to look at Bill Clinton, I want to look at other Democratic figures. I want to look at people that are associated with Epstein. Pam Bondi, I want you to dig into this. And she responds within a couple hours saying, yes, we will. And as a matter of fact, I'm tasking the U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York, the largest federal prosecutorial office in the country. Well, wait a minute. A couple of months ago, you said you didn't even have enough new evidence.

B (5:19)

There was no there.

A (5:19)

There was no information to even open a case. And so the idea that now we're in a situation that, okay, so we're gonna go look at something that you just said that there wasn't something there. But if you look at this law, if they say that the materials that this law encompasses, look, we've got an ongoing investigation, we can't release any of the documents at all. Is that where this is going here?

B (5:41)

Let me get to line four, which is a requirement that the redactions and categories of information release be detailed to Congress. So Congress will know what, in fact is being redacted.

A (5:49)

I think that's going to be an important thing, so we at least have a sense of what was the information that was redacted, what was there, and what types of things did they want to hold on to. That's going to be key for accountability. That's, I think, why Congress put that in there. But just so people understand, this whole law is unusual, and this is kind of an unusual provision in law. But we do typically get, when we ask for documents via foia, whether it be the FBI or the Justice Department, they will redact names. But in that they will. In the area that's redacted, they will put a number and a letter next to it which corresponds with a. Here's why we did this.

B (6:27)

That's like a footnote in a way.

A (6:28)

Helpful. Footnote's a great. A great way of kind of drawing an analogy there.

B (6:33)

How's law enforcement feeling now amidst the revival of yet another investigation?

A (6:39)

For law enforcement, it's kind of like we've been here, we've told you everything. Tons of agents spent hundreds, if not thousands of hours of spring going through every single document yet again to see what could be released, what could be redacted. They've already done this process, and now they're being asked to do it again. So to me, in a time where the FBI is going to battle China, Russia, Iran, all three viable threats here in New York City and across the country, ISIS and the violent crime initiatives which have been prioritized in this administration.

B (7:12)

It feels like a waste of resources.

A (7:14)

How many more agents are you going to put on this? On the other hand, if there's a potential case to be brought or somebody comes forward, perhaps there's not enough resources that you could throw at it. So there could be a bit of a point of frustration of we have done this before and we're looking for a needle in a stack of needles that we've already gone through 100 times. So at the end of the day, agents are typically guided by the fact of what if? What if we find one more thing that could bring a case and bring satisfaction for the victims? That'll be their North Star, if you will.

B (7:48)

Tom Winter, thank you as always. All right. We are going to take a quick break, but when we're back, Saudi Arabia's crown prince sits down with the president this season. Find the gifts they'll love with Shop today's gifts. We love gifts to surprise him and to let her the hot toys for kids and those hard to shop for teens with Shop Today's Gifts We Love. You can shop our top 100 gifts for everyone on your list. So you can find everything they really want and maybe even a little treat just for you. It's your ultimate holiday gift guide with incredible deals you don't want to miss. For the gifts they're sure to Love, head to today.com GiftsWeLove and start shopping now.

A (8:32)

NBC News focuses on the facts, looking deeper and listening wider. It's clear reporting free from opinion, facts, clarity, calm.

B (8:43)

NBC News reporting for America.

C (8:47)

Who's ready for some football?

A (8:50)

All season, the TODAY show takes you inside the game.

C (8:53)

We are gonna get this party started.

A (8:55)

Join us every week as we go behind the scenes with your favorite NFL teams for the biggest stories on and off the field. Big game tonight, plus game day recipes that dial up your tailgate.

B (9:06)

Football food, soup to nuts.

A (9:08)

From stadium lights to game day bites, the Today is your home for all things football every morning on NBC.

B (9:21)

Welcome back to here's a scoop from NBC News. So all eyes are on the White House today where the president is rolling out the red carpet for Saudi Arabia's crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman. Remember, not long ago the crown prince was treated as a global pariah after a CIA assessment found he approved the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi, something the Saudi government has denied. Fast forward to now and the relationship is warm again, or at least warming up. We have got Saudi backed live golf tournaments at Trump properties, reports of potential real estate deals with the Trump Organization. And then just last Night, the president announcing a major sale of F35 fighter jets to the Saudis. That's despite a Pentagon intel warning that China could gain access to some of that technology. So all of this is coming as the president looks to Riyadh for help in shaping what comes next in Gaza, including reconstruction and security in the region. There's a lot to unpack here, so I want to bring in White House correspondent Monica Alba. Hi, Monica.

C (10:18)

Hey, Yasmin. Thanks for having me.

B (10:19)

It's great to have you. So it seems as if this visit was probably the most pomp and circumstance we have seen so far for a foreign dignitary, the future king of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. What have you seen?

C (10:33)

There was so much pomp and circumstance here. It was basically a state visit in everything but name. And that's sort of a technicality because since the crown prince is not the head of state technically of Saudi Arabia, that is, of course, his father, the king, you can't technically call it a state visit. But you had all of the trappings of a state visit, the literal rolling out of the red carpet. There was a military flyover with F35s and F16s. And there's also going to be a black tie dinner later this evening at the White House, again in the honor of, according to the president, for the Saudi crown prince, who he called a very good friend and somebody that he is really working to shore up a very close relationship with, one we have seen over the years that now has gotten even closer. And that was on full display today.

B (11:26)

I want to talk about how we got here, because I think a lot of folks would say that the US Saudi relationship is quite controversial and would go on to talk about, of course, what we know about the crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, and his connection to the killing of Jamal Khashoggi. And we know even after Monica, the CIA concluded that the crown prince himself ordered the killing. The president at the time, Donald Trump, defended the Saudi government even back then. Walk us through how we got from there to now. Mohammed bin Salman being invited into the Oval Office and what it is the United States really needs from the crown prince of Saudi Arabia.

C (12:12)

You mentioned defending him at the time, in the years since, and sitting right next to him in the Oval Office today, again, saying essentially that the crown prince is somebody who has done a, quote, phenomenal job and saying that the journalists that we're talking about his murder, Jamal Khashoggi, was a, quote, extremely controversial person. He is saying the president in the Oval Office essentially, quote, things happen and we can leave it at that. And he did lash out at the journalist who was asking a question, not just to President Trump, but to the Saudi crown prince in that moment. To respond to that, you're mentioning somebody.

A (12:53)

That was extremely controversial. A lot of people didn't like that gentleman that you're talking about. Whether you like him or didn't like him, things happen. But he knew nothing about it. And we can leave it at that. You don't have to embarrass our guests by asking a question like that.

C (13:08)

So I thought that was a very telling moment and one that was a huge show of where the president's feelings are here and what he has talked about. Again, despite the CIA's own assessment of this and really the worldwide condemnation that we saw years ago, today you're seeing the Saudi crown Prince be welcomed back into the diplomatic fold in a very significant way from an American president that is just so notable given what we saw years ago. And again, some of the other controversy that we've seen that President Trump today pretty much dismissed out of hand.

B (13:44)

But I also think it's interesting because it's coupled with what it is the United States needs in this moment. Right. And that is their cooperation when it comes to the rebuilding of and securing of Gaza.

C (13:56)

Certainly. Yeah. And something we heard from the crown Prince today is that he said he was in discussion about contributing some significant Saudi funds to reconstruction efforts in Gaza. President Trump said that it would be, quote, a lot. So it's unclear exactly how much that is. These business deals, it's really the lens through which we can almost view President Trump and the Saudi Crown Prince's relationship. Right now he is viewing him as sort of a business partner in many ways and trying to work out many different deals beyond in the region, but also likely some more defense and economic agreements and cooperations. And we know that they also are going to be talking about and potentially coming away with some agreements when it comes to AI, when it comes to some American made military technology that could potentially be useful to Saudi Arabia. Of course, we know the president had said that F35s would be sold despite some of those concerns about where the technology could end up and the risks there. But overall, the president just views this as an opportunity. And the price that going into this meeting we had been hearing about $600 billion of a potential investment in the United States. And that promise got upped to $1 trillion according to the Saudi crown prince just in this conversation. And the president said he liked that very much. And we'll see if that actually bears out.

B (15:29)

Monica Alba, thank you.

C (15:31)

Thanks so much.

B (15:34)

All right, let's get to some headlines. The UN Security Council just gave a major endorsement to President Trump's Gaza peace plan, passing a US Drafted resolution on Monday. The measure, which would be phase two of the plan, passed 13 with abstentions from Russia and China. It greenlights two major elements an international stabilization forced secure and demilitarize Gaza and a board of peace, which Trump will chair to manage reconstruction. While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the resolution's passage, he has previously stated he rejects its talk of Palestinian self determination and statehood. This divide over the plan's long term goal was compounded as the militant group Hamas immediately rejected the move, calling it a, quote, international guardianship. A new West Health Gallup survey finds that Americans have healthcare anxiety going into 2026. Is anybody surprised by this? The survey had roughly 20,000Americans answering from all 50 states and found that 47% of adults are concerned about healthcare affordability next year. Respondents ranked the best and worst states for overall healthcare experiences, with Iowa, Massachusetts and D.C. in the top three and New Mexico, Nevada and Alaska in the bottom three. But even in the top ranked states, it's hard to feel like a winner. About 25% of people who live in the top 10 states still reported skipping medical care due to costs. But if you live in the bottom 10 states, that number jumps 40%. Long wait times, work schedules and delayed care aren't doing us any favors. With 55% of America citing those as barriers, experts suggest that these findings could pressure Congress to enhance ACA subsidies before the end of the year. The Supreme Court is stepping into the border debate. Justices agreed to review a policy called metering, which past administrations, including Obama's and Trump's, used to cap the number of asylum seekers allowed to enter the US From Mexico, even though President Biden officially ended the practice back in 2021. The Trump administration pressed the Supreme Court to hear the case, arguing that lower court rulings illegally stripped the government of a critical tool for managing migration surges. The high court will now decide if the policy, which prevents migrants from setting foot in the US to seek asylum until processing space opens up, is constitutional and legal. The ruling is expected in June. And now I want to sit back and relax and enjoy my evening when all of a sudden I hear this agitating. It literally gets me every single time. If you're anything like me, you use your iPhone as an alarm clock. You look at the time, you figure out what is eight, maybe 10 more minutes gonna do to my day. You hit snooze, you go back to bed like you have nowhere else to be. Well, Apple's new iOS update may have just turned your extra five minutes into an extra hour. Here's why. When your alarm clock starts blasting now, you get a Slide to Stop widget instead of a regular stop button. And if you want to snooze, you still have to tap the screen like a button. But if you want to stop the alarm completely, you swipe your finger across the screen. It seems pretty intuitive until you're half asleep and you'll do anything to make the noise stop. Many Apple users, they are complaining that the clock's app design makes it too easy to hit stop instead of snooze. But do not worry, folks, you can always customize your alarm back to the old features so in the words of Sza, you won't hit snooze and miss the moment. All right, that is gonna do it for us. Thanks for listening to Here's a scoop from NBC News. I'm Yasmin Vesugin. We'll be back tomorrow with whatever the day may bring. And if you like what you heard, subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. We'll see you tomorrow.

C (19:28)

Hey everyone, it's Jenna Bush Hager from Today with Jenna and Friends, reminding you to check out my podcast, Open Book with Jenna. In this week's episode, I sit down with authors Carly Fortune, Kennedy Ryan and Heather Amy o' Neal live at a Read With Jenna Girls Night out event. We chat about their creative process, how they bring complex female characters to life, and the ways their own experiences have shaped their writing. You can listen to the full conversation now by searching Open Book with Jenna. Wherever you get your podcast.