Did I Really Do That?

Hidden Brain

•

Published: Mon Mar 17 2025

Have you ever been falsely accused of something? Many of us think there’s only one way we’d act in such a situation: we’d defend ourselves. We’d do whatever it takes to clear our name — and above all else, we’d never, ever confess to something we didn’t do. But psychologist Saul Kassin says that’s a myth. This week, we bring you a favorite 2022 episode about why we sometimes act against our own self-interest — even when the stakes are at their highest.

Summary

Hidden Brain Episode Summary: "Did I Really Do That?"

Host: Shankar Vedantam
Guest: Dr. Saul Kassin, Psychologist at John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Release Date: March 17, 2025

Introduction

In the thought-provoking episode titled "Did I Really Do That?" of the acclaimed podcast Hidden Brain, host Shankar Vedantam delves into the intricate psychology behind false confessions. Featuring insights from Dr. Saul Kassin, a renowned psychologist specializing in wrongful convictions and jury psychology, the episode unravels the mechanisms that lead individuals to admit crimes they did not commit and examines the broader implications for the criminal justice system and societal trust.

A Personal Journey: From Accusation to Advocacy

The episode begins with Dr. Kassin recounting a pivotal moment from his sixth-grade experience. Assigned to write a book report about his hero, Mickey Mantle, Dr. Kassin aimed to impress his teacher, Mrs. Avery. However, his heartfelt effort resulted in an unexpected and devastating accusation of plagiarism.

Dr. Saul Kassin [03:12]: "I just will never forget the helplessness that I felt at having been accused of something I didn't do and not really knowing how to respond in a way, to defend myself."

This early encounter with wrongful accusation planted the seeds for his future career in psychology, focusing on understanding how individuals interpret others' actions and navigate accusations.

The Psychology of Jurors and Confessions

Dr. Kassin's academic journey led him to explore how juries interpret confessions and determine guilt. In his experiments, he discovered that jurors heavily rely on confessions as definitive proof of guilt, often disregarding contradictory evidence.

Dr. Saul Kassin [05:11]: "When a defendant admits he had done something wrong, volunteers playing the role of jurors saw these as open and shut cases."

Recognizing that confessions could act as "nuisance variables" obscuring the true nature of cases, Dr. Kassin sought to understand the underlying psychological factors influencing juror decisions.

Interrogation Tactics and Their Impact

A significant portion of the episode focuses on the comparison between Dr. Kassin's study of juries and traditional police interrogation techniques. Drawing parallels with Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments, Dr. Kassin highlights how authoritative pressure can lead to high rates of false confessions.

Dr. Saul Kassin [09:00]: "If an authority figure like a psych experimenter can produce that level of obedience, can you imagine what a detective who has power over your fate and future might be able to produce?"

He underscores the potency of interrogation methods that isolate suspects, deprive them of social support, and employ assertive authority to extract admissions of guilt, often irrespective of the truth.

Case Study: The Central Park Jogger

Dr. Kassin delves into the infamous Central Park Jogger case to illustrate the real-world consequences of false confessions. In 1989, five teenagers—comprised of black and Latino youths—were coerced into confessing to a brutal attack in Central Park. Despite their confessions, DNA evidence later exonerated them, revealing that the true perpetrator was a different individual.

Dr. Saul Kassin [26:07]: "There were some semen samples taken, sent to the FBI lab that summer. The results came back first. All of those samples taken traced back to one person. They all match each other. That person was not one of those five confessors."

The episode highlights the systemic failures that allowed these false confessions to secure convictions, emphasizing the urgent need for reform in interrogation practices.

Types of False Confessions

Dr. Kassin categorizes false confessions into three primary types:

Voluntary False Confessions: Individuals confess without external pressure, often to protect someone else or due to psychological motives.

Dr. Saul Kassin [13:22]: "Voluntary false confessors can't do it. They might be protecting somebody else."
Compliant False Confessions: Individuals concede to pressure and stress during interrogations to escape a distressing situation, even if they know they are innocent.

Dr. Saul Kassin [15:18]: "They may have come to believe it's in their better interest to confess than to deny involvement."
Internalized False Confessions: Individuals genuinely start to believe they committed the crime due to manipulative interrogation techniques, leading to a complete acceptance of false guilt.

Dr. Saul Kassin [29:30]: "He transitioned from this state of denial to, well, it looks like I did it."

Experimental Insights: Inducing False Confessions

To understand the malleability of human memory and compliance, Dr. Kassin conducted experiments simulating interrogation environments. In one such experiment, participants were subjected to false evidence and peer testimony, significantly increasing the likelihood of false admissions.

Dr. Saul Kassin [43:48]: "We got a substantial increase in the number of people who then falsely confessed and agreed to sign the paper to hitting the alt key."

Another experiment demonstrated how secondhand confessions can corrupt the memories and testimonies of others, further entrenching false narratives.

Dr. Saul Kassin [45:13]: "Once a false confession is out of the bag, it corrupts everything around, corrupts eyewitnesses, it corrupts alibis, it corrupts informants."

Corporate Confessions: The AutoZone Case

Expanding the discussion beyond law enforcement, Dr. Kassin presents the case of Joaquin Robles from AutoZone. Robles was coerced into confessing to theft through intense interrogation by a loss prevention manager, leading to unjust termination despite the eventual revelation that the missing money was a clerical error.

Dr. Saul Kassin [48:30]: "He signed his name, and then he signs a promissory note in which he's agreeing to have that money deducted from his paychecks to compensate AutoZone."

This example underscores that the tactics leading to false confessions are not confined to criminal justice but are also prevalent in corporate environments, posing ethical and legal challenges.

Recommendations to Mitigate False Confessions

Dr. Kassin offers actionable solutions to reduce the incidence of false confessions both in criminal justice and corporate settings:

Comprehensive Recording: All interrogation and interrogation-like sessions should be fully recorded to ensure transparency and accountability.
Evidence-Based Techniques: Adopt interrogation methods that rely solely on evidence presented by the confessor, avoiding the introduction of external information that could manipulate memory.
Scientific Skepticism: Encourage investigators and police to approach cases with scientific skepticism, continuously testing and challenging their own hypotheses to prevent confirmation bias.

Dr. Saul Kassin [50:11]: "It's not a question of the pressure that is felt. Some of the most benign interrogators... ask open-ended questions. They don't communicate information about the crime."

Conclusion

"Did I Really Do That?" serves as a compelling exploration of the fragile nature of truth within the human psyche and the justice system. Through Dr. Saul Kassin's extensive research and real-world case studies, Hidden Brain illuminates the profound impact of interrogation techniques on individual consciousness and societal justice. The episode calls for introspection and reform, urging both legal institutions and private organizations to adopt practices that uphold integrity and safeguard against the miscarriages of justice inherent in false confessions.

Notable Quotes

Dr. Saul Kassin [05:11]: "When a defendant admits he had done something wrong, volunteers playing the role of jurors saw these as open and shut cases."
Dr. Saul Kassin [09:00]: "If an authority figure like a psych experimenter can produce that level of obedience, can you imagine what a detective who has power over your fate and future might be able to produce?"
Dr. Saul Kassin [26:07]: "There were some semen samples taken, sent to the FBI lab that summer. The results came back first. All of those samples taken traced back to one person. That person was not one of those five confessors."
Dr. Saul Kassin [43:48]: "We got a substantial increase in the number of people who then falsely confessed and agreed to sign the paper to hitting the alt key."
Dr. Saul Kassin [50:11]: "It's not a question of the pressure that is felt. Some of the most benign interrogators... ask open-ended questions. They don't communicate information about the crime."

Further Engagement

For more insights into the psychology of confessions and the workings of the criminal justice system, subscribe to Hidden Brain and explore Dr. Saul Kassin's seminal work, Why Innocent People Confess and Why We Believe Their Confessions.