Shankar Vedantam (3:23)

I remember many days during my school years when I was so bored I would fall asleep in class. But on those very same days, I would find myself alone in a university library at night, poring over books that had nothing to do with my classwork, oblivious as the hours slipped by. How could the same person be bored to death in one academic setting and completely engaged in another? At the University of Southern California, psychologist and neuroscientist Mary Helen Imordino Yang has explored this question for many years. She studies the science of engagement and motivation. Mary Helen Immordino Yang, welcome to Hidden Brain.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (4:01)

Thank you for having me.

Shankar Vedantam (4:03)

Mary Helen, you're now a professor of education, but as a kid, I understand that you struggle to feel engaged by school.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (4:11)

I really did. I couldn't understand kind of what the point was or what it meant to do things there. And school really didn't feel like it was about learning for me. It felt like it was about doing stuff. And I can hardly describe the sense of just release on Friday afternoon and the dread on Sunday night. Through my late elementary especially and early middle school, sixth grade year, I finally ended up for a lot of complex reasons for things that were happening at school. I finally ended up just kind of stopping going to school. I sort of was like a soft dropout about, you know, I just stopped getting up in the morning. And I think my parents just kind of stood back and realized I was doing all kinds of interesting things. We had the great fortune of living in the woods in Connecticut in a very remote place. And my parents, who were both from the inner city, one from Detroit, one from Yonkers, New York, right. They decided they were going to raise their kids on a farm and try to grow what and, you know, and have animals and all kinds of things. And so I was really deeply involved with running that farm, taking care of the animals. I was playing the piano. I was, you know, running around in the woods, training dogs and, you know, all kinds of things that was keeping me very, very busy.

Shankar Vedantam (5:34)

I understand that at one point, your grandmother once discovered something unusual in her refrigerator that you had left there. Tell me that story, Mary Helen.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (5:43)

Oh, God. I was a little older, and that actually represents a turning point in my education. I think my parents had the resources to be able to find a different kind of education system for me. So they moved me the following year into a private school that had, as it turns out, much more rigorous and interesting academics in Addition to all kinds of theater and art and singing and all these other things that I was very interested in. And so I started there in seventh grade, and I just really fell in love with science class. Thank you, Mrs. Susan Lundgren, if you're still out there, for really teaching us so much interesting stuff. And we were doing all these laboratory experiments where we were dissecting all kinds of things from flowers and worms to fish. And that really pulled me in. So for my seventh grade science project, I decided to try to, you know, figure out how sight works, how we see in the eyeball, what the eyeball is structured like. And so, you know, I read all about it, and my dad went with me, and he basically got a bunch of cow eyeballs harvested out of some cows who had been slaughtered. And we brought home this bag of eyeballs for me to dissect. And I put it in the refrigerator. And my poor grandmother came to visit and was like, what's this in the refrigerator? And realized it was a bag full of eyeballs. But I did go on to take those eyeballs apart and really try to figure out what are these different parts? How do they relate to the model I have here and what is this role they're playing in vision? And I really just loved to be sort of self directed and designing my own project and kind of digging in on it, but also being accountable to share what I had learned in a more rigorous academic way at school. So I really thrived that year.

Shankar Vedantam (7:47)

I understand that you came to be deeply interested in woodworking and boat building. How did you discover this passion? MARY Helen?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (7:54)

Oh, I always loved to build things. And, you know, growing up on this, like, sort of, kind of sort of little farm thing in the woods, right? You know, we built it all ourselves. So when there was a hurricane, a bunch of trees fell down, and we had those turned into lumber and boards, and we had to build the fences right for pastures to have sheep and things in them and horses. And we built a barn. And I was tagging along behind this elderly Yankee gentleman who was a really master builder, who. He was an expert in stone walls and in building things. And I was following along behind him as his assistant. And so from there, I really got into woodworking. Growing up, I also got very interested in boat building, wooden boat building for a while. And I went to Russia and to Kenya, you know, different places in the world where people were building traditional wooden boats of different sorts, and just was trying to work with people there, with men there, to build these things, to understand how they Constructed these, you know, beautiful straight boats that go, you know, that go in a line and that, and that are controllable, out of wood, that squirrely mangrove, you know, So I just found that really compelling.

Shankar Vedantam (9:17)

In her early 20s, Mary Helen began teaching science at a public school. The school had lots of immigrant families from Africa. She was teaching them about evolution.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (9:28)

What fascinated me was that the kids started to ask me questions about why, when we talked about early humans and hominids, why they were always depicted with dark skin, like they looked like black people. And I remember in particular, one girl, you know, bravely raising her hand, and it just struck me that all the other kids were kind of pushing her on, like, yeah, yeah, ask the question, asking me, why is that the case? Why do these early hominids always. Why are they depicted with dark skin? And, of course, they were on the equator, where without dark skin, you would fry. Right? You would have skin cancer, you'd be sunburned. And I think it was a turning point moment because the kids suddenly realized that the concept of evolution and of adaptation to your environment was applying to them as well in that context. They were seeing themselves adapt to a new environment. They were looking around at each other and seeing how they were different from one another. And they realized that the reasons we are the way we are is something to do with where we come from and how we've adapted ourselves to fit into the world and to flourish in the spaces in which our ancestors came from. And that became the entree into conversations about race, about identity, but also about individual variability, about the ways in which development and experience shape who you are.

Shankar Vedantam (10:47)

Hmm. I understand that after this experience in the classroom, these students also became more engaged with the science. They actually wanted to learn more because now they're not just learning about abstract concepts. They're learning about things that they feel they have a direct connection to.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (11:04)

Yeah, they became very deeply interested, some of them, in really, the ways that science could help them explore the world. I remember one. One girl who went for the first time. We were kind of near the beach, but she had never been to the coast before, and her parents took her on a weekend excursion to the beach. And she came back eagerly on Monday morning with a. With a coffee can with snails in it and was telling me, like, look, they're alive. Like, these things were at the beach. So I think they really took some of the concepts and tried to use that approach to explore their world, and that was incredibly powerful.

Shankar Vedantam (11:41)

So even as your students were using the science and thinking about ways that the science could apply to their lives. I also see you as a young teacher, basically looking at these students and saying, some light bulb has gone off here. These students were perhaps not as engaged earlier, but now their eyes are alight with excitement. They're basically trying to apply this to their own lives. At what point did you have the insight that you were seeing some important clue to the science of engagement?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (12:09)

I mean, kids were running into my classroom at, you know, 7 o' clock in the morning with a can of snails and some seawater and right? Saying, like, look, look, they're alive. Right. I think the engagement really showed itself in the fact that kids were running off on their own, designing their own things and trying to use the resources I was providing them to do the stuff they were imagining. We filled the course with projects. I gave kids a huge amount of leeway in what kinds of activities they would like. I set out a goal. All right, we're studying astronomy now. Here's what it looks like. But then different kids had to figure out for themselves what did they want to do in that space? And I really kind of tried to throw the ball back in their court and make them in charge of deciding what do they want to do in this space? How were they going to design this project I'd suggested? And I was teaching them to use the microscopes that I found in the closet. I was teaching them to use some of the other scientific instrumentation that we had floating around. And then they were designing activities for themselves. You know, that rift off of the things I was introducing them to in the class.

Shankar Vedantam (13:26)

What is it that makes the very same person bored and unmotivated in one setting and aflame with curiosity in another? When we come back, searching for the magic recipe for deep engagement. You're listening to Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta. Sometimes an identity threat is a ring of professional hackers. And sometimes it's an overworked accountant who forgot to encrypt their connection while sending bank details.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (13:54)

I need a coffee. And you need Lifelock. Because your info is in endless places.

Shankar Vedantam (14:00)

It only takes one mistake to expose you to identity theft. Lifelock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (14:06)

If your identity is stolen, we'll fix it, guaranteed, or your money back.

Shankar Vedantam (14:10)

Save up to 40% your first year at lifelock.com specialoffer terms apply. This is Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedantam. Mary Helen Imordino Yang is a psychologist and neuroscientist at the University of Southern California. She studies what makes students engaged and Motivated or disengaged and disaffected. Mary Helen, As a way of seeking answers to the questions raised by your own experiences of learning and teaching, you became a researcher working under the eminent neuroscientist Antonio Damasio. The two of you were attempting to understand engagement on a neurological level. Now, he had tried various ways of evoking engagement in the lab, but nothing seemed to be working.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (14:58)

Yeah, so Antonio, when I first met him, and Hannah, his collaborator and wife, were deeply interested in trying to understand how the human brain creates engagement and emotion around ideas, around social relationships and values and beliefs. And it was remarkably difficult to genuinely elicit those kinds of complex feelings in a laboratory setting. What ended up working just remarkably well was to bring together stories of real people's lives from around the world, people in a variety of complex situations, and compose these stories into little mini documentaries that I would share with the participants in our experiments in a private two hour long interview where I would show them a small 2 minute to 5 minute documentary and tell them the story of someone's situation and then just ask them, how does this person's story make you feel? And from that, people began to really start to actively engage with and show us, exteriorize their own meaning making process, the way in which they made sense of what they'd heard and learned and then went from there to begin to tell stories about what it meant to them and how they felt about it. And we moved people to the MRI scanner after that and scanned their brain activity. We also recorded the activity in their bodies, their heart rate, their breathing. Right. Called psychophysiological recording at the same time. And we had them watch the stories again in the scanner and push buttons in real time to tell us how emotionally engaged they were with that story at that moment. And what we were able to do was design a method in which we could relate patterns of brain activity and body activity to expressions of emotional engagement that they are subjectively telling us they're having in real time. And look at how those patterns were related to the ways in which they made meaning of the story and narratives, their own experience of thinking about the story in the interview.

Shankar Vedantam (17:24)

So one of the video clips you showed was of Malala Yousafzai, who described what it was like to seek an education in a region of Pakistan that was under the control of the Taliban in the war.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (17:35)

The girls are going to their schools.

Shankar Vedantam (17:37)

Freely and there is no fair.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (17:40)

But in savat, when we go to our school, we are very afraid of Taliban. He will kill us even through any and he can do anything.

Shankar Vedantam (17:52)

So you showed this video to one teenager named Issella. How did it make her feel? What did she say?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (17:58)

Mary Helen what Isella said, I think was quite extraordinary and turned out to reveal a kind of pattern of thinking that many adolescents engaged in different ways, and that we discovered was very important to both their brain growth and their social growth. What Isella said was first along the lines of, well, this story makes me feel very upset. It's going to be so difficult for her. She wants to be a doctor, but it's very difficult because she's not allowed to go to school. And that's frightening, and it makes me sad. But then she paused, and that pause is very important neurologically, because we think what's happening is she's shifting herself into another mode of engagement where she's leveraging systems of the brain that are involved in consciousness, in autobiographical memory, in storytelling and beliefs and values. And what she said next was astounding. She said, it's crazy how it's that powerful. She says something like, it makes me think about my own journey in education and how I want to go to college and hopefully be a scientist someday. Right? So she was likening her own experience to that girl's experience to see the similarity. But then she moves even beyond that and says, I guess what really hits me, like, what the emotion is about now is how not everyone's able to get this chance to go forward with their life and get an education and do what they want to do with their life. And she says, it's not right. She moves from analyzing this one girl's sad situation, which is very difficult and makes her sad, to this much more powerful story about what it means for what's right in the world, what happens, what shouldn't happen, what could happen and who she and that girl both are in the space of the broader world and what that means for what's right. She has invented morality out of a story that was a specific example.

Shankar Vedantam (20:05)

What makes this powerful is, of course, she is relating the story she is hearing to her own life. So she's not just seeing it as this other girl's story over there, but she's saying, this is my story, too.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (20:16)

She's saying, it's my story, too. But she even goes beyond that. She goes all the way toward the end and says, it's not right. It makes me feel upset that other people who live in certain parts of the world where they don't want people to learn are trying to hold them back. Right? She starts to Understand that both she and this girl are part of an even bigger world. So she goes from that girl to her own story, to something even bigger than the two of them. And she ends by saying everyone everywhere should have the chance. I mean, all human beings should be able to live free and choose their life future. So she has invented an idea, a belief, a value about how the world should be for everyone. From explaining and making sense of one girl's story, relating it to her own story, relating it to the possible future, stories she had hoped to invent for herself, and from there, thinking about what's right or good or possible everywhere for everyone.

Shankar Vedantam (21:23)

Students like Issela connected with these stories in a way that went beyond the mere facts. You came to call this kind of engagement transcendent thinking. What do you mean by the term?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (21:34)

Isella engaged in this thing we're calling transcendent thinking because her thinking moved from the current context and transcended that context to think also about what these examples mean for bigger ideas, for what's right or good, for how institutions work, for the intentions behind the institutions and the settings and the situations that she learned about, for the values, the morals, the beliefs, for the possible futures, for the historical interpretations, for the identities that they invoke. Kids did this in many different ways. But the heart of transcendent thinking is that kids became deeply engaged with thinking about something bigger than what was directly in front of them.

Shankar Vedantam (22:25)

You ran a similar kind of study with teenagers in urban Los Angeles, and you asked them to think about crime in their neighborhoods. Tell me about that study and what you found there, Mary Helen.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (22:36)

Right. So we asked kids who were not involved in any kind of criminal activity, who were not under any disciplinary action at school, who were passing all of their classes, who were from stable home situations, so kids who were, you know, doing fine, as my grandmother would have said. Right. We asked those kids about the things that they'd witnessed and seen in their neighborhoods, and they told us about a range of scary, dangerous criminal activity of various sorts. But we didn't stop there. We then went through with them and said, okay, so you said you saw a drug deal, or you said you saw somebody get arrested, or you said you saw somebody vandalize something or somebody get in a fight. Why do you think that happens? And how do you think the different actors in that scenario felt? And how do you think the cop felt? How do you think the little kid watching felt? Right. And then we asked them a really pivotal question. We said, imagine you were in charge and the people in your neighborhood who run things would do whatever you asked them to do as the new policy to try to make your neighborhood a better, safer place, what would you advise them to do? And there again, we saw an amazing range of answers where some kids stayed sort of in the immediate moment, saying, well, these people are bad people. They do bad things, they lose control of their emotion, they get angry, and they just do something before they think. And they deserve to be rounded up or punished in some way. And that's how you're going to control things, right? Or there's nothing that can be done to control it, said one kid. This is just how these people are. Stay away from them. Other kids went beyond this to say, well, I think you have to think about the bigger picture. I think you have to think about the person's history. One kid told me, he said something like, everyone has a history, everyone has a story, and that changes who they are because of the way they've lived in their life. So if we really wanted to do something to make the neighborhood better, we should think about why these people feel the way they do, that they get themselves into these situations. And he went on to tell me about his own family and how he had been loved and safe, but maybe these people hadn't been, and maybe that's where we should focus our efforts if we wanted to make the neighborhood better.

Shankar Vedantam (24:56)

So in transcendent thinking, you're not just considering the facts in front of you, but you're trying to see how those facts connect with other facts and perhaps more important, how individual facts are like, you know, like trees in a forest. And you're not just seeing the trees, you're actually trying to see the forest.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (25:12)

That's right. And you're trying to understand what makes the forest go right. You're trying to see the hidden forces that are not immediately obvious when you just look at the forest. You're trying to understand gravity and osmosis and climate. Right? You're trying to understand the bigger things that are behind the forest, but that are not immediately obvious when you just look at it.

Shankar Vedantam (25:39)

Do we know what's happening in the brain when kids are engaged in this kind of transcendent thinking? MARY Helen Yes.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (25:46)

So when the kids moved into the MRI scanner and thought about these same stories again, we were able to look across a young person's activity profile and match up particular time periods where they were telling us they were thinking about a particular story that they had reacted to in the interview in a transcendent way as compared to the stories they had Reacted to in a more concrete way. And so what we found is that there were particular network properties of the brain that systematically came active and deactive in this coordinated pattern that was driven by the kid's expression of strong emotion and that organized the basic networks in the brain that led to transcendent thinking.

Shankar Vedantam (26:37)

Hmm. What were these networks in the brain? Mary Helen, describe some of these to me.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (26:43)

So there were three main networks involved at the level that we're analyzing. Of course, the brain is infinitely complex, but these networks were the focus of our investigation. And what we found was that networks that are involved in emotion, in feeling the inside of your guts and visceral body, that tell you when your heart's pounding or that you have a stomachache, that tell you when there's a snake in your path and suddenly you should and look where you're going. Right. Those networks were active networks that were allowing the person to sort of focus in a goal directed way on attending to the world and learning about what was in front of them and remembering it and sort of integrating everything that they'd heard were active early, but for the first few seconds of watching a story. But then those networks became profoundly deactivated as the kid let go of their attention into the world. And instead, networks that are more intrinsically focused, that are mapping your state of consciousness, that are involved in autobiographical memory, that are involved in transcending the current here and now. These are the networks you use to daydream and to mind wander. Those networks became concertedly active as kids were thinking about these big transcendent ideas. So what we showed was that there was a kind of active dynamic trade off between outward attention and inward reflection, being driven by emotion and that sort of seesaw tottering back and forth as the young person was moving themselves into these different modes of brain activity which are corresponding to different kinds of thinking. That was what we found was associated with this transcendent thinking.

Shankar Vedantam (28:41)

You found that transcendent thinking was associated with more resilience in the face of adverse events. How did you discover this?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (28:48)

We discovered that most directly with the interviews about the violence and crime that kids had witnessed in their communities. Because what we discovered was that witnessing or even knowing about crime was associated with thinning in particular regions of the cortex that are involved in kind of outward vigilance, emotion, motivation, learning. Right. Your brain is reacting to the dangerous things around it by becoming hyper vigilant and anxious about it. And these were the same regions in the brain that become thinner among soldiers deployed as ground troops. It's Also been shown to be involved in post traumatic stress disorder among people with clinical symptomology. And we were seeing that these very same brain systems were getting thinner in our kids, the more violence they knew about in their community. But what we also found is that the more kids talked in a transcendent way about what could be done about the violence, about why it happens, the more they said things like, well, everybody's got a story or a history. You have to look beyond what happened here in this situation and think about, well, how did that person get here? Right? And that's where we can do something about making our neighborhood better. When kids said things like that, that kind of thinking physically was associated with thickening in the brain in these same pivotal regions for attention and pain and motivation and learning. And what we found is that thinking in these transcendent ways about the violence actually counteracted the negative effect of violence on the brain development.

Shankar Vedantam (30:32)

I understand that teenagers who engaged in this kind of transcendent thinking also reported greater life satisfaction to you.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (30:40)

So we did a longitudinal study. That means we followed the same group of teenagers for five years, and we kept bringing them back to the lab and then talking to them about who they were and having them tell us about themselves over time. And what we found that was really striking was that their transcendent thinking, the tendency that they brought to the first original interview where they were 14, 15, 16, 17 years old, right. To think about these stories that we were sharing with them in a transcendent way, to move beyond just this is a story about Malala to a story about what's right or good in the world for everyone. Right. That tendency, in turn, predicted the future of the growth of their brain, and that growth, in turn, predicted identity development in late adolescence at age 19 or so. Right. How much kids said, yeah, I really think about the adult I want to become and what I stand for and what my values are and what I believe in and what my purpose is. And in turn, identity development at age 19 predicted young adult life satisfaction in their early 20s. Kids well being and life flourishing and satisfaction in their early 20s was predicted by their tendency to engage in more of this transcendent thinking in the original interview five years before. So kids had to show us that across time they were doing the work of growing themselves.

Shankar Vedantam (32:20)

So, Mary Helen, you've advanced the intriguing theory that transcends thinking might effectively be the opposite of the patterns of thinking that we often see in anxiety and depression. Can you describe the contrast between these two styles of thinking?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (32:36)

What transcendent thinking does that I think is protective for kids and deeply grows them is kids are actively, dynamically, agentically moving themselves from being here and now in the world, paying attention to those around them, reacting appropriately, getting things done, engaging with tasks, and also noticing emotionally when what really matters here is something bigger, when they can withdraw from that kind of go, go, go, do, do, do, what does it look like into a place where we think about what does this mean? And as kids are actively dynamically shifting themselves between those ways of making meaning, they're building the neural muscle, so to speak, for mental health and for good relationships. Others who are engaging in clinical research with teens are showing that these same networks, when they're hyperactive and not flexibly trading off with one another, are involved in what appears to be the neural correlates of these mental illnesses like depression and anxiety. When kids get stuck attending to the outer world and to appearances and worrying about what's around them, we call that anxiety. When they get stuck tipped the other way, where they're in their own head and they're thinking about just stories and ruminating that's associated with depression. What transcendent thinking does is to is kids are agentically moving themselves between these two states in appropriate ways according to the situation and what it calls for. And that is like a neural muscle that we think produces mental well being.

Shankar Vedantam (34:16)

Mary Helen believes that the development of transcendent thinking should be at the core of every student's education. But of course it isn't. So many students around the world experience school today as deathly boring. When we come back, how to place engagement at the center of education. You're listening to Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta. This is Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta. Mary Helen Immordino Yang is a psychologist and neuroscientist at the University of Southern California. She's the author of Emotions, Learning and the Brain, Exploring the educational implications of affective Neuroscience. Mary Helen, you've been studying expert teachers to determine what they know about how adolescents develop and thrive. In some ways, you're looking at examples of what social scientists might call positive deviance. You know, the math teacher who gets students to not just be proficient in math, but to actually love math. And I understand you're examining what these teachers are doing in their classrooms.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (35:44)

Yeah, that's right. We set out to study teachers working in urban inner city Los Angeles whose administrators identified them as their quote unquote superstars. Right. The teachers who kids really love really go to the teachers who the administrators say are just the ones really dedicated to the kids who do really great work. And so we approached 40 of these amazing people and asked them if they would be willing to, to let us study them, basically to have us videotape them in their classroom and whether they would come to the lab and actually let us image their brains in real time while they did their work. They graded their students homeworks and gave feedback to their students and made judgments about classroom activities that they saw and told us what they thought about them. What we found was quite extraordinary. So we gave them a kid's assignment. We said, this is Shankar's work grade, his assignment. And then, you know, here's Mary Helen's work grade, her assignment. And then after a bunch of their own kids, we gave them a bunch of kids assignments that we told them were not their own kids work. And we told them we had taken those off the Internet. And actually what we had done though, is written those assignments to be matched in quality. And what we found was that first the teachers graded the two assignments the same way. So, you know, gave Mary Helen a B over here. And you gave the fake answer that we pulled off the Internet from a kid that thinks like Mary Helen, also a baby. Right. So they knew what they were doing. But what we found was that the brain activity when they graded their own students versus students they didn't know was massively more all over the brain. We see increases in activity in regions involved in motivation, attention, memory, emotion, autobiographical, thinking, ideas, beliefs, consciousness. Right. These teachers are doing more mental, social, affective work when they're seeing their own kids assignments than when they're seeing the assignments that are the same but by kids they don't know. What that tells us is that excellent teachers are doing work that is deeply social and emotional and effortful, even beyond what's required to just accomplish the teaching task, which is grading the assignment. So what was accounting for the difference in the brain activity in the two conditions? We asked these same teachers to provide open ended feedback to their students. And so we said, here's your student Mary Helen. What would you say to Mary Helen if you had a meeting with her about how she's doing? Here's your student chunk of what would you say to Shankar if you had a meeting with him about what he's doing? And what we were looking for was to what degree do teachers actually appreciate and support actively in their feedback to their students the whole development of that young person's capacities of mind. And what we found was that the more a teacher's feedback to their students involved this kind of deep developmental support, the more activity they showed when they saw their real students assignments versus kids assignments that they don't know the kid.

Shankar Vedantam (39:14)

Truly great teachers do more than convey information. In fact, they do more than help students think. They attend to where their students are emotionally, developmentally. The great teacher is asking, where is the student in their development as a human being? How can I support that growth? Mary Helen says that neuroscience shows that this question cannot be purely about intellect. It has to be about emotion as well.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (39:43)

I think our traditional Western philosophies too often separate cognition and emotion. We think that there are cognitive skills and there are emotional skills. Right. And that maybe those two things impact on each other. Right. But actually, that's the wrong way to think about it. There are two different dimensions of the same thing. Thinking is inherently cognitive and emotional, always at the same time. And we can look at thinking from a cognitive lens and analyze the cognitive dimensions of what's going on. And it's important to do that. We can look at thinking from an effective lens and analyze the emotional engagement that's going on. But actually, both of those things are simultaneously happening in an integrated way. Always when people are alive, when they're moving through the world, adapting and engaging with the things around them.

Shankar Vedantam (40:41)

Great teachers understand, perhaps instinctively, that in order to get students to learn, they have to care about what they are learning. Emotion has to sit in the driver's seat, if you will. This is not merely an argument about how school ought to work. Mary Helen says this is simply how the human brain is designed to work.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (41:02)

Yeah, it turns out biology doesn't waste energy. Right. We don't think about things that don't matter because that would be a waste of time and energy. So if you think about it this way, whatever you're having emotion about is what you're thinking about. And whatever you're thinking about, you might be able to learn about. So we need to ask ourselves, as parents, as teachers, as people, what am I having emotion about? And when the emotions of school and development are about the achievements and the outcomes and the results, that is what you have a hope of learning about. When the emotions in school are about the physics, why the ball's rolling down the ramp, and this hidden idea that there's this force you can't see that's pulling on the ball, and it's also pulling on us, and it's making the moon make the tides. Right. When the emotion is about that powerful idea, that is when meaningful learning is about the idea. And that's when you actually build transferable knowledge that is developmentally changing the person for having learned it.

Shankar Vedantam (42:18)

You saw how this worked for one student in particular who was able to attach emotion and meaning to a philosophical problem that's known as Zeno's Paradox. The paradox goes back many centuries. Imagine you're running a 100 meter race. You first have to run 50 meters, in other words, half the distance, and then you have to run 25 meters, or, in other words, half the remaining distance. And of course, you can keep doing this, which is each time you're running half of the remaining distance. And the paradox is that since there are an infinite number of half distances that you have to traverse, you will Never reach the 100 meter finish line. Whereas, of course, we know that in the real world, we all routinely can run the 100 meter. So this is the paradox known as Zeno's Paradox. Tell me the story of what happened and how the student attached emotion and meaning to the paradox and came to understand it in the context of his own life.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (43:12)

So this is an example of a really fantastic math curriculum that's built by a school in New York City that's an alternative high school for kids who haven't passed their classes in traditional schools for whatever reason. Some of them are new immigrants to the country. Some of them have just failed in the past and not connected with schools. Some of them are in trouble. And so these teachers have designed a math curriculum that turns things on its head right, but they actually have it right. Rather than starting with the building blocks of how to calculate things and working up, they start with big, powerful, intriguing ideas. They get kids involved with those. They choose big problems to work on, and then those problems become the space in which they learn mathematical calculation because they're so driven to understand their problem. So this one young man is describing how he had never before taken a math class and passed. And in this math class, he was given a big problem called Zeno's Paradox. It's this problem that he calls walking to the door. You get halfway, halfway, halfway to the door. Do you ever make it to the door? Why or why not? And he says, I got so fascinated by this problem, I had to learn fractions to solve the problem I had. And I got fascinated by ideas like asymptotes and finite and infinite. And he talks about how he's moving back and forth between being fascinated by this big idea and having to learn the calculations and the mathematical concepts to be able to satisfy his curiosity about that big Idea. And as he is, we think, tilting his brain sort of back and forth from paying attention, learning about fractions because I care about big ideas like infinity. What an amazing idea. An asymptote that you get closer and closer to something, but you never reach it. Right as he's doing that, he's tickling up, we think, the same regions of his brain that are the ones that are the kind of pivot of the attentional seesaw, which are the feeling of your guts and viscera and your own self. And what we think is happening is that by engaging in these. In these agentic ways of moving yourself between doing the skill and thinking about the big idea and then doing the. The calculations again because you care about the big idea, what happens is that the after effect is you activate up these regions of the brain that are the seat of our subjective feeling of our own internal self. They're the feeling of being me. And the kid says. And many of the kids in this kind of curriculum say, it got relevant to my life. It mattered to my life. You've never passed a math class before. You're a new immigrant to the United States, living in poverty. And infinity got relevant to your life and fractions. Because relevance is not necessarily simply about the direct applicability of a skill to your everyday things you need to accomplish. That's important, but that's relevance with what I would call a little R. Relevance with a big R is it feels like me to think about and understand this big, powerful idea. I'm moving through the world with a level of understanding and analysis that I didn't have before. That feels powerful. And when you do that, the math becomes relevant to who I am.

Shankar Vedantam (46:49)

There is a philosophical shift in thinking that lies at the heart of engaging people in exploration and curiosity. It involves paying less attention to what you are teaching, whether that's algebra or civics, and more attention to the development of the human being you are trying to teach. Mary Helen calls this conceptual shift the equivalent of a Copernican revolution.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (47:12)

So we set the cart before the horse in the way we design our curricula. Right now, we're thinking too much about what little learning nuggets get shoved in the cart. And we forget to think about who's the horse pulling that cart. What does that horse need? And that's, I think, the fundamental problem with the way we've designed our education system today.

Shankar Vedantam (47:37)

That's coming up next. You're listening to Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (47:53)

Foreign.

Shankar Vedantam (48:03)

This is Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta. Mary Helen Immordino Yang found herself deeply disengaged when she was in school. After she became an education researcher and a parent herself, the wheel came full circle. She told me a story about her own son. The story comes in two chapters, second grade and third grade.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (48:26)

In second grade, he was so disheartened with school because he finally expressed to me that they don't study the things in school that he was interested in. And I said, well, what are you interested in? He said, well, airplanes and how they work. I said, okay, here's what you should do, Ted. You write a letter to your teacher and you explain and write a proposal in which you say, how about. Right, like, I was able to study airplanes and other kids might be able to study other things that they're interested in, and you work out how this will happen, right? And so he wrote a whole proposal to his teachers that basically said, how about if every kid had the chance and the option to engage in an extra project where they could investigate on their own and explore it, they could get approval first for the topic and some guidance from their teacher, and then they could go off and study something they're interested in, and when they're ready, they could come back and they could report on that to the class. And so his teacher said, fantastic. You're welcome to do that. So he went off and began studying about airplane wings and their aerodynamic properties and all these things with my husband, his father, right. Who is an aerospace engineer. And he came back and did this amazing presentation that my husband had helped him design. And they did together where they taught the class about how airplane wings work and the ways that Lyft operates and all these kinds of things. And he had an amazing time. The following year, he had a teacher who was very good, but she didn't understand that the purpose of school was to engage kids deeply with ideas. She thought of the kids and her as partners in the learning process, that she was giving them the information, and their job was to, you know, sort of compliantly give back. And when that happened, well, and according to plan, that's the definition of a good student. And Ted was deeply disheartened by this approach. And it came out in his real dislike and failure to move on from thinking about this behavior chart that she had in the class, which was not in any of his other classes in the school, where she had, you know, kind of green on the top, you're doing what you're supposed to do, yellow in the middle, you're. You're getting in hot water and red meaning like, you know, you're behaving badly, right? And kids little clips were moving up and down on this. And he. He finally was so upset about. And she didn't understand how if he was always on green, it was a problem. And what he wrote to her in a letter finally was that it's like when I get to school every day, he says, I think it's a new day. And I get there to try to learn something new and exciting. And instead I see the bad behavior chart, right? And he says, this fact makes me very uncomfortable. And he goes on to explain how it's as if the teacher is trying to dare me to do something bad. It's like what he's really saying is, I thought school was about ideas and learning, and you're telling me it's about compliance and behavior.

Shankar Vedantam (51:34)

What Mary Helen and her colleagues have found is that the best teachers engage the kind of transcendent thinking that we discussed earlier. Regardless of whether they are teaching chemistry or civics, history or math, they are constantly asking themselves, how can I help my students see the big ideas behind the facts I'm teaching? Mary Helen cites the example of two teachers she tracked during one of her studies. Both are gifted, but one of them is focused on skillfully transmitting information, and the other is focused on growing the brains of students using the syllabus as a launchpad for transcendent thinking.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (52:12)

We had one teacher who invited us to see the class that he had designed as a review for his civics class. High school civics class. The review before the final exam. It was before the winter holiday. He had a holiday playlist playing of music in the background. He had made a game where he put up on the board questions with multiple choice. And kids were in teams with whiteboards. And they had to write down what they thought their answer was. And it was timed. And he was dancing with a lightsaber to entertain them and keep them moving. And the kids were all saying, what do you think it is? What's the answer? I think it's A, I think it's B. And then he would say, everybody put their whiteboards up and like, the answer's B. And yeah, give me the points. And they would put the points on the board, right? Contrast that with a teacher who was teaching Algebra 2. And what she had done around her class was explained to kids that the ways that exponential functions work, the ways that quadratic equations work, they allow you to calculate something called exponential growth. And what she did was as the Kids were learning the math. She then assigned them to families from the neighborhood as financial planners. So they worked and wrestled with those families across the semester to get financial information about those families hopes to buy a home to pay for their kids education, those kinds of things, their income, their expenses. And the kids used their Algebra 2 skills to calculate the cost of owning a home, the amount they should be saving to be able to pay for their child's education someday. And, and they worked with real families and presented them with financial planning resources. As those kids engaged in that math, they were so deeply connected to the reason why that math matters. It empowered them to be useful members of their community, to be experts who were resources to the families in their community.

Shankar Vedantam (54:09)

And of course at this point, the formulas for compound interest are only a means to the end. And the end is how do I help this other family make sure that they are planning securely for the future?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (54:21)

Yes, that's right. And at the same time, I'm actually really deeply invested in learning my math. What often happens, I spend a lot of time talking to teachers and parents and kids. What often happens is that when teachers learn about this, they say they first see the person with the whiteboard and the civics game and it thinks, oh, look at those kids are super engaged. Those aren't the kind of kids who normally would be engaged in this. They're all answering the questions and stuff and they think that's great. And then you start to show them other examples of teachers like the algebra 2 teacher or others where the kids are calm, they're thoughtful and they're assured and they act professional. They are advising a family on their financial planning and the demeanor they bring to their math. All of a sudden the teachers perk up and say, oh, I guess I knew that. Of course, I've always wanted to do that, but I didn't know how I knew. I was noticing disengagement in my kids and. But I thought that the opposite of disengagement was entertainment and everybody putting their hand up and saying, ooh, ooh, call on me. This is fun. I love school, which is great. That's not terrible. But it's not enough deep engagement. It looks calm, it looks thoughtful, it looks agentic. It looks like kids are actually interested in what they're studying. They understand why they're doing it and they're deeply invested in what they're doing.

Shankar Vedantam (55:39)

I mean, in some ways I think what I hear you saying is that this Algebra 2 teacher is actually not so much teaching Algebra 2 as much as a Form of human development?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (55:49)

Well, she's teaching Algebra 2 as a means to human development, right? In education, we've made the mistake of thinking that the quote unquote outcome of school is quote unquote learning. Right. Learning outcomes are how we measure whether school was successful. But I would argue that learning outcomes are a misnomer, they're a red herring. Those are incredibly important things to achieve. You must learn things in school. But that's not the ultimate purpose of school. That's the means to the ultimate purpose. The ultimate purpose, the outcome is human development. So we have to ask ourselves, what does having learned this enable in the kids as they move forward? How does having been here and experienced this learning opportunity change who they are developmentally moving forward? How does it change their proclivities to engage with information, their dispositions to think about complex information in this field? Has it changed the way they understand and think scientifically who they position themselves to be when they move through the world? And that is meaningful developmentally oriented education. The learning is important, Important, it's critical, but it is not the endpoint, it's the means. The endpoint is the development and we've neglected that.

Shankar Vedantam (57:19)

I'm wondering if one implication of this, Mary Helen, is that in some ways the range and volume of things that we typically expect students to learn in high school or college might be too much. That in some ways, if you want to get really deep engagement and really want people to go deep rather than broad, you might actually have to cover less ground than we're covering today.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (57:43)

Yeah, I think that's partly true. But I also think that once kids develop a real disposition to learn, once they develop a curiosity and a way of approaching the academic opportunities you provide for them, that really puts the agency in their pocket rather than in the adults. What happens is kids can accomplish super things. But what's true is that when we overly constrain and make them learn a broad range of things without the opportunities to really go deep, what happens is that all of the learning becomes superficial and it ends up not sticking with them anyway. What's really key for young people to develop is the disposition to deeply engage with learning and the self awareness in the learning process to know what it feels like to really understand something, what it feels like to become an expert. You know, one way I explain this is when we look at little kids, you know, lots of us have been or had 4 year olds who got super fascinated with dinosaurs, right? They started memorizing all the names of the dinosaurs and what they ate. And what kind of teeth they had and all this kind of stuff. And, you know, no one stops and Sundays, oh, my four year old is really on track to becoming a paleontologist. Right? What is it that they're doing? They're developing their proclivity for learning. They're experiencing a little bit of expertise. They may probably even know more about something than their parent does. How empowering is that? And they're searching out new learning about something that isn't in their immediate here and now that they have to go to museums or books to learn about. And that's the developmental nature of that learning process. But when our kids get to be teenagers, we somehow think that the learning is mainly about stashing little nuts in their head like a squirrel, right? Where it's about how many little things can you shove in there? And we forget that. The point is, just like with those four year olds, the content is important. You need a breadth of content, right? And ways of thinking about things. But what's really important is that you learn proclivities for deeply engaging with expertise, with ideas, with evidence, with thoughtful ways of analyzing and understanding things. But we often in mainstream secondary education do not do this. We substitute content for developmental opportunities to learn, to think.

Shankar Vedantam (60:09)

I'm wondering whether people give you pushback and say, you know, Mary Helen, what you're describing is very idealistic and would be wonderful to do in classrooms and schools. But the challenges that we're facing are at a much more basic level. You know, students are not showing up to class. We have attendance problems, we have discipline problems. Is your recommendation, Mary Helen, something that is actually practical?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (60:30)

Yeah. Well, I got news like the wide real world isn't working very well for a lot of kids, right? And so we keep doubling down on starting with the basics and working our way up. And the kids are absent, right? Either mentally or, heaven forbid, physically. Right. That's because the design of our education system does not align with the developmental needs of young people. Human beings show up naturally with curiosity, with adaptability, with engagement. And when we lower their engagement and curiosity to tiny little building block things that you have to pass through those bottlenecks before you can get to anything interesting, you have lost them. What if we turned it around and we invite kids back to school with big ideas, with powerful projects, with opportunities to actually make change in their community, Start there and work backwards to the instrumental skills, the history, the writing, you know, the interviewing, the speaking, all of the skills that would play into their ability to do those projects. We have to put the big idea first. So you engage kids and give them the power to need school. And then you say, okay, you need to know fractions, kid. Who's excited about Zeno's Paradox? Step back, come over here. I'm going to teach it to you right now. You need to know it, right? You're studying about lead in the water in Flint, Michigan. Let me teach you some chemistry. It's going to be very useful to you trying to figure out that thing you're really deeply engaged in. Right? So we set the cart before the horse in the way we design our curricula. Right now we're thinking too much about what little learning nuggets get shoved in the cart and we forget to think about who's the horse pulling that cart. What does that horse need? That's, I think, the fundamental problem with the way we've designed our education system today. It's backwards. The building block skills follow the big, intriguing ideas and the curiosities. And then the kids need the building block skills. And they come back and say, please, teacher, I want to write a commentary about reforming the foster care system, because I've lived through it and I've got some ideas. Can you remind me, what does a good topic sentence really accomplish again? Because I need people to understand what I'm trying to say. It's important.

Shankar Vedantam (63:01)

Isn't it possible that there are some things that you have to learn that in fact cannot be connected to bigger concepts or more abstract concepts, that you actually just have to do the grunt work, if you will, of learning the nuts and bolts, the blocks of blocking and tackling.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (63:14)

The nuts and bolts in the blocking and tackling are absolutely real. And they take grit and persistence and deep effort. Right. But they follow a big idea. There is no nut and bolt and, and, and, and grunt work that doesn't have some reason for knowing it. When kids are asking, why do I need to do this? Why do I need to know this? That represents a failing of the design of the curriculum. It should be very clear to everybody in that room why you need to know this before you start learning it. They need to know it. They need to feel the need. And then, yes, you have to work hard. You have to have self discipline, you have to have control, you have to have stick to itiveness. And all those things are things you develop within yourself. But we're fighting an uphill battle by trying to develop those skills when there actually is no big reason why you should have to do these things that the kids are privy to.

Shankar Vedantam (64:05)

Hmm. You also Talk about something that effective teachers do, which is they expose young people to diverse perspectives in a way that is open minded and experimental. And you saw this happening in a class you observed at a school in New York. Talk about what you saw and heard.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (64:21)

Mary HELEN I think teachers can design their curricula in such a way that they invite young people into a new world of thinking in that disciplinary domain. So in one particular class I saw, which I thought was so skillfully done, this 10th grade history teacher in a school in New York called the class Democracy is an Argument. And he taught American history from the perspective of the tension that's constantly present between the needs of individuals and the needs of groups. And they examined all of American history from this tension. And by looking from this perspective, what that teacher has brilliantly done is inherently set up kids to think about as they learn what happened and when and where and the implications of that. They're set up to look for a bigger hidden idea, which is what are the tensions behind the values and the beliefs of the various actors and how do they back balance themselves and how does the tension between those lead to the unfolding of historical events? It helped the kids to think deeply about the history and also to inevitably see the lessons from history that apply in our current world. Now.

Shankar Vedantam (65:52)

When we come back flipping the classroom script. You're listening to Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (66:09)

When work gets crazy, I like to stop by the bar after have a few cold ones. I don't drink at all until 4 o'. Clock. We limit ourselves to one bottle of wine a night.

Shankar Vedantam (66:20)

Excessive drinking has a way of sneaking up on us. A few drinks a few nights a week, it can add up and suddenly we're at greater risk for long term problems like heart disease, cancer and depression. Reason enough to rethink the Drink. More@rethinkthedrink.com no HA initiative and now a next level moment from AT&T business. Say you've sent out a gigantic shipment of pillows and they need to be there in time for International Sleep day. You've got AT and T5G so you're fully confident, but the vendor isn't responding.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (66:50)

And International Sleep Day is Tomor.

Shankar Vedantam (66:52)

Luckily, AT&T 5G lets you deal with.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (66:54)

Any issues with ease.

Shankar Vedantam (66:55)

So the pillows will get delivered and everyone can sleep soundly, especially you.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (66:59)

AT&T 5G requires a compatible plan and device. Coverage not available everywhere.

Shankar Vedantam (67:03)

Learn more@att.com 5G Network this is Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta. Mary Helen Imordino Yang is a scholar at the University of Southern California. She feels that a good part of our education system is increasingly focused on the transmission of information. Especially in the age of AI, this would seem like a prescription to become redundant very quickly. Supercomputers have read more documents, more books, more scientific papers than any human. What are the skills that will prove indispensable and irreplaceable in the years to come? The ability to step back and see connection, to see how something that is true in one context might fail in another, to integrate knowledge and skills with judgment and ethics. All of this, of course, is what Mary Helen is talking about when she talks about transcendent thinking. I asked her how she has brought these ideas to bear in her own teaching.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (68:08)

Yeah, in my own teaching. I mean, at this point in my life, I teach parents, I teach teachers, but I teach classes for graduate students. Right, right. What I do is I really try to engage people in their own meaning making. I put up the data, the story. It's like a journey. I think of the curriculum as a journey. Come with me on a journey through a way of thinking about these things. I'm going to introduce you to a whole bunch of new evidence stories and stuff, and then we're going to think together about, okay, what does this mean now, applying it back to your own practice, to your own understanding of the concept. So there's a famous neuroscientist, Dan Schachter, who did a very interesting experiment decades ago now where he asked people a simple question. How many windows are in your living room? And the majority of people answer that question. And you say, how did you answer that question? The majority of people answered that question by recounting that I had no idea the answer unless I just happened to have bought drapes last week. Right. But what I did was I closed my eyes, imagined myself in my living room, and walked around and counted. And that's the way memory actually works. When it's deep, meaningful, complex memory for the kinds of things we really want kids to accomplish in school. You live in the living room of that disciplinary space so experientially, richly, that you then can resituate yourself in that disciplinary frame and walk around and count windows, so to speak, you can derive information that you never had memorized before. We forget in education that the core memory system of the brain that holds together the memories we so care about, which are semantic memories, memories for facts and information, procedural memories, memories for how to do stuff, those two kinds of memories are organized in the brain and mind by what you would call autobiographical memory. It's like the hat stand of memory that all the other stuff gets hung on. It's the experience of having been here, thinking about these things, the personal, subjective, lived experience of engaging with this opportunity to learn that becomes the frame on which the information gets connected. When I teach, I try to bring people on a journey with me and I don't make this a secret. I tell them this is what I'm doing. I'm going to introduce you to interesting case studies, interesting findings, interesting pieces of information, interesting videos of people that are embodying ideas that I want us to try to learn about. What do you see in this? And I establish the students as agentic, curious learners. They are the people who show up in the space like science is trying to, to figure out what's the idea here and how does it square with the things I've known before and what sense does it make. And that's the entry point into the curriculum. Rather than let me give you the basic information about the brain, we're going to start with all the parts and then we'll talk about what they do. And then next week we'll get into the important stuff about how it works. Let's just look at videotapes of people, kids, teachers, right? People learning, people out in the world together and watch what's happening, happening. And then think backwards, learning about, well, how is the brain and the body enabling those things to happen and how are they looking different in these different contexts and why? And what does this mean for how we might support learning in these different contexts? So we turn it backwards around and intrigue people with the examples first and then work backward once they have seen the example to help them think about, okay, let me tell you some of the facts about what's going on behind here. Now, how does that change your ability to analyze and understand what you could learn from this?

Shankar Vedantam (72:04)

I mean, it sounds almost self evident when you put it this way. But really what you're saying is that education is actually not about the things that you're teaching students. It's actually about the students themselves. If the students are at the heart of education, if the focus is on students, what they come to love, their own understanding of themselves, their place in the world, then all the learning and the facts and the information almost come along with that, rather than starting with the facts and the learning.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (72:32)

Yeah, this is an idea that we've been writing about and advocating for for some time. And I have a paper with several colleagues that's Available on the Internet, called Weaving a Colorful Cloth, which is about this notion. And what we're arguing is that we need to recenter education like a Copernican shift, we're changing the perspective on the metrics and the processes that we have. So, you know, right now, for so long, what we've done is we're basically standing on the earth, making the earth the center and watching the kids and the learning outcomes go by. And when they go in the wrong direction or they slow down or things happen, we don't really know what to do about it. Right. We can't make sense of that. But when we reframe so that we realize that, oh, another way to understand this which is equally correct but more useful is that the experience of the person doing the thinking and learning, their subjective experience is the center of the solar system. And the rest of us in our learning outcomes are spinning around and watching that. All of a sudden, the paradoxes, when we look up into the sky, many of them fall away because it now makes sense from this new perspective why they're moving in a direction that didn't conform to our previous expectations. Right, Right. And so when we refocus the educational enterprise on the subjective experience of thinking, what does it feel like to me to think here? How does thinking here change the way in which I engage with the process of learning? When we focus on that as the core of the enterprise, that's actionable, that helps us to make sense of why the learning outcomes are as they are and how we might change them if we're not happy with them. In our education systems, we focus way too much on the learning outcome as the metric of the functioning of the system. And the problem with that is it doesn't tell you what you need to know. What kids don't meet the achievement marks you want, we don't know what to do about that. What we need to do in tandem is go back and really analyze how our kids kids thinking with the material. What does it mean to think here? What does it feel like to think here? What is my process when I'm tackling a problem? And as we start to uncover that that's actionable and that's what really skilled teachers hone in on.

Shankar Vedantam (75:02)

I understand that your own daughter had a very different experience of education when she attended a school school in Denmark. Tell me the story of what happened.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (75:11)

Yeah, so when our own daughter was in 10th grade, she, you know, she had been in public school. She was doing very well, but she was also frustrated by the fact that she felt like her very rigorous academic curriculum and this high performing public school limited her ability to take intellectual risks. So I remember her expressing to me her frustration in AP biology when, and you know, there was a question and she knew perfectly well what the answer was that she was supposed to answer on this AP biology test. But she wondered why it wasn't another explanation. And she wanted to put that so she could get feedback on why that couldn't be true also. But she knew that wasn't what they were looking for and she knew you have to get an A on this class or you're not going to get to go to college. So she had to not ask, right? And she was angry about that. So we were looking for an opportunity for her to really grow herself in a different kind of school, just for a bit. In Denmark they have schools called EFTA schools after school school. And what they are is a one year opportunity in a kind of a folk school format, to come together with youth from across the country who share interests with you. So kids from all walks of life from across Denmark who are, who share an interest in orchestra, music, go to one of these schools in, in sports, in arts, right? These kids sort of find one of these community schools and they opt into an extra year of school in between their required school, which ends in ninth grade, which is a little older than our ninth grade, and then making a choice about what kind of adult trajectory they're going to take, are they going to go on to more education or travel or do work or what? And so these kids all come together. And the school that my daughter attended, she was the only foreign student. And so the school was about what they called social studies. It was about situating yourself as a Danish citizen in this historical context and using math, science, outdoor activities, service to the community, historical analysis, all these things to try to really think about what do we want for our nation. My daughter attended this school the year after President Trump was elected the first time. And people in Europe were concerned about a Syrian refugee cris. There were people pouring into the continent from terrible refugee situations. They were trying to absorb them in, but they also were having a crisis of identity themselves. How do we manage with all these new citizens who don't garden and eat like us, right? And so the school, rather than just teaching about that, they situated the kids in the history of this. And then they put all the kids, 140 kids and the teachers onto buses and drove them 17 hours to Krakow, Poland, where they spent a week studying Auschwitz and the role of the Danish people in the Holocaust. And they then helped the kids think about learning from that history. How do you want to make sense of and manage the refugee crisis in Europe today? Because it's your issue to manage. 17 year old, this is your world. You're soon going to be taking over the country and running things. How do you want to position yourselves to be able to manage this crisis? And it was an incredible opportunity where they let the kids, with support, with historical knowledge, with adults thinking with them, really start to grapple with the real big fraught issues that were facing their country and their society and their world. Now, now.

Shankar Vedantam (78:57)

What was your daughter's impression of the school compared to what she was used to back home? Did she feel like it was a more authentic experience of what education was supposed to be like?

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (79:06)

I think it was actually surprisingly difficult for her. She expressed she loved the school. She never said she didn't enjoy herself, but. But it was extremely difficult for her to be in an environment where there were not assignments and metrics and rubrics and somebody telling her what grade she got. And she was embarrassed to admit, she told me that it was very difficult for her to just work in this open ended way. She was so used to being a good student. And what that means is teachers give you really hard stuff and you deliver on it, right? These teachers were inviting the kids into the physics laboratory, organizing a curriculum around concepts and saying, what would you like to do? Dig in, right? And we're here to answer your questions, to support you. I don't know. Are you done with this physics problem and project or do you want to work more on it? What have you accomplished? Where are you stuck? What have you learned? What would you do differently next time? And they refused to give direct feedback about the endpoint, the achievement. And she found it incredibly difficult. And at one point, about halfway through the year, she would talk to me every night before she went to bed. And she said to me, you know, mom, I've realized something about myself it's kind of embarrassing to admit. I said, yeah. She said, yeah. You know, you know those kids in high school who have a boyfriend or a girlfriend not because they really love the person, but because they just, you know, want somebody to walk into the party with and to sit with at lunch and to laugh at their jokes and tell them they look nice? And I said, yeah. And she said, well, that's grades for me.

Shankar Vedantam (80:36)

Me.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (80:38)

I'm ashamed to admit that I use them to remind myself that I'm smart, that I have potential, that I've worked hard rather than thinking about how do I decide for myself if I'm smarter, I have potential, I've worked hard, why am I doing this? And she had to really rethink and re engage in a very different way in her own work. And it was was extremely difficult but so fulfilling for her over time. And I think it really fundamentally changed the way she oriented herself towards school and the learning process. She's now about to start her PhD. You know, I think she really re engaged with the opportunities school provided to learn for her own learning rather than for the metrics and achievement goals that other people set for her. And what she taught me was which was really eye openening is really difficult. The real struggle academically in education happens when the teachers step back and even you're not taking five APs with somebody else coming in and telling you this is due on this day and this is due on this day and this is what an A is and this is what a C is. And here's the rubric. When the teachers instead set out the opportunity and the kids need to decide to for themselves what they're studying and why and how and whether they're done and what they've learned and what other people are learning and get feedback on that, that is where the hard work actually is. And what she told me is that without grades, without these formalized assignments and due dates, it was the hardest academic learning she's ever done. And it was fundamental to the way in which she now understands her own role in the scholarly, scholarly world.

Shankar Vedantam (82:25)

Mary Helen Imordino Yang is a psychologist and neuroscientist at the University of Southern California. She's the author of Emotions, Learning and the Exploring the Educational Implications of Affective Neuroscience. Mary Helen, thank you so much for joining me today on Hidden Brain.

Mary Helen Immordino Yang (82:42)

Thank you for having me. It's a true pleasure.

Shankar Vedantam (82:57)

Do you have follow up questions about learning for Mary Helen Immortino Yang maybe you're a teacher who has discovered your own techniques for engaging students or a student with thoughts on how you think learning should unfold. If you'd be willing to share your question or comment with the Hidden Brain audience, please record a voice memo on your phone and email it to us@ideashiddenbrain.org Two or three minutes is plenty. And use the subject line learning. That email address again is ideasiddenbrain.org Hidden Brain is produced by Hidden Brain Media. Our audio production team includes Annie Murphy, Paul Kristin Wong, Laura Kwerell, Ryan Katz, Autumn Barnes, Andrew Chadwick and Nick Woodbury. Tara Boyle is our Executive Producer. I'm Hidden Brain's Executive Editor. If you love Hidden Brain and the ideas we explore on our show, please consider subscribing to our newsletter. Every week we'll bring you new and interesting research about what it means to be human. You can check it out and subscribe@news.hiddenbrain.org that's N E W S.hiddenbrain.org I'm Shankar Vedantam. See you soon.