Podcast
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Hosted by True Crime Today · EN
🔎 Daily True Crime Podcast | Criminal Psychology | Ongoing Trials | Expert Analysis
Multiple new episodes every day! Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski is your ultimate daily true crime podcast, bringing you real-time updates on criminal investigations, high-profile trials, forensic breakthroughs, and psychological deep dives into the minds of killers.
🎙️ Hosted by veteran journalist Tony Brueski, we go beyond the headlines, featuring exclusive insights from FBI agents, forensic experts, criminal psychologists, and legal analysts. Whether it's the latest developments in cases like Bryan Kohberger and Lori Vallow or deep dives into cold cases and unsolved mysteries, we uncover the hidden truths behind the crimes that captivate the world.
If you’re obsessed with true crime, forensic psychology, and legal drama, subscribe now to Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski on Apple Podcasts. 🎧 New episodes multiple times a day—stay ahead of the latest crime stories.
Join our SubStack: https://HiddenKillers.SubStack.com
📺Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
📷Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
💻Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
⏰Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod/
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Multiple new episodes every day! Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski is your ultimate daily true crime podcast, bringing you real-time updates on criminal investigations, high-profile trials, forensic breakthroughs, and psychological deep dives into the minds of killers.
🎙️ Hosted by veteran journalist Tony Brueski, we go beyond the headlines, featuring exclusive insights from FBI agents, forensic experts, criminal psychologists, and legal analysts. Whether it's the latest developments in cases like Bryan Kohberger and Lori Vallow or deep dives into cold cases and unsolved mysteries, we uncover the hidden truths behind the crimes that captivate the world.
If you’re obsessed with true crime, forensic psychology, and legal drama, subscribe now to Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski on Apple Podcasts. 🎧 New episodes multiple times a day—stay ahead of the latest crime stories.
Join our SubStack: https://HiddenKillers.SubStack.com
📺Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
📷Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
💻Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
⏰Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod/
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
507episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Why Did The Press Print BTK's Own Self-Made Nickname For 30 Years?
3w ago00:20:01Tap to summarizeDennis Rader was the BTK Killer. He was also the man who named himself the BTK Killer. He typed the name onto an envelope and mailed it to the Wichita Eagle in October of 1974, and the city has been calling him by that name ever since.In the first chapter of a new five-part investigation, Hidden Killers host Tony Brueski takes apart the mythology Dennis Rader built around his own crimes. Factor X. The Minotaur. The BTK brand. None of it came from a profiler. None of it came from a detective. All of it came from a man at his own kitchen typewriter in Park City, Kansas, while his wife slept down the hall.For nearly fifty years, the BTK story has been told in his words and his frame. Documentaries quote his letters. Books quote his letters. Podcasts quote his letters. The version of him in the cultural imagination is the version he composed about himself.The actual file shows something different. A criminal justice student at Wichita State who'd taken classes on offender profiling. An alarm installer who had legal access to hundreds of Wichita homes. A husband and a father who chose, at thirty-two, to begin writing himself a role he could spend the rest of his life playing.This episode walks through what Rader wrote, when he wrote it, what he borrowed from, and the press response that made the legend official. The series will follow with the chase that didn't close, the costumes that made him invisible, the thirteen-year silence between his confirmed murders, and the catch that ended his run in 2005.This is the first uncomfortable truth. Dennis Rader was not a force of evil. He was a vain man with a marketing plan and a typewriter that worked.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #BTKKiller #HiddenKillers #FactorX #TrueCrime #Wichita #ParkCity #SerialKillers #UncomfortableTruths
Transcribe →What Did Mackenzie Shirilla's Car Record in the Seconds Before the Crash?
3w ago00:12:44Tap to summarizeThe data recorder inside Mackenzie Shirilla's Toyota Camry captured a story she never told anyone. The accelerator was at full capacity. There was no attempt to brake. The car was aimed in a straight line at a brick building in Strongsville, Ohio, traveling close to a hundred miles per hour. Dominic Russo, twenty, and Davion Flanagan, nineteen, were dead when first responders arrived. Shirilla survived.She never spoke to investigators. She never took the stand. The entire case was built on what the evidence said in her silence — and it said a great deal.Weeks before the crash, Shirilla told Russo she would "crash this car right now." Surveillance footage showed her driving the same dead-end route days before the fatal night, on a road she didn't normally use. Investigators argued the crash wasn't a sudden decision — it was rehearsed.On monitored jail calls, Shirilla and her mother communicated in a coded language that detectives had to decode. Once cracked, prosecutors said the calls revealed Shirilla asking whether they could tell police she'd had a seizure. That claim became the foundation of her defense — her attorneys argued that a blood pressure condition called POTS had caused her to lose consciousness behind the wheel. Prosecutors countered that a person who blacked out couldn't maintain foot pressure on an accelerator at full capacity in a controlled straight line. The judge agreed.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to examine what the physical evidence reveals about the final seconds before impact, how investigators build a murder case on circumstantial evidence alone, and why the coded jail calls may have sealed the conviction.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #TheCrash #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #Strongsville #OhioMurder
Transcribe →Did Investigators Deliberately Destroy the Key Evidence in Aaron Spencer's Case?
3w ago00:16:01Tap to summarizeA dashcam SD card that was most likely recording during the final moments of the Aaron Spencer case disappeared from police custody. Investigators handled it in violation of their own department's procedures. A judge reviewed the evidence — or what was left of it — and concluded the pattern of failures gave "the appearance of a coverup."That language came from the court, not the defense. Special Judge Ralph Wilson found that law enforcement conduct was "so egregious" that the second-degree murder charge against Spencer had to be thrown out entirely. Spencer had killed Michael Fosler after reportedly spotting the man with his daughter — the same girl Fosler was accused of victimizing, the same man who'd been released on bond and allegedly gained access to her again.The political layer makes this harder to dismiss as incompetence. Spencer was running for Lonoke County sheriff against the incumbent, John Staley. The agency that lost the SD card belonged to the man Spencer was trying to replace. The original judge assigned to the case was removed twice by the Arkansas Supreme Court. Investigators, prosecutors, and the initial court all appeared to be moving in one direction — against the father, not toward the truth.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to dissect what the FBI is trained to look for when multiple people in positions of authority all appear to be protecting the same outcome — and what a federal investigation into this department would actually look like on the ground.The murder case is over. The questions about what happened to that evidence are just beginning.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AaronSpencer #LonokeCounty #MichaelFosler #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #CoverupAllegations #EvidenceLost #ArkansasCrime
Transcribe →What Do The Three Timestamps In The Nancy Guthrie Case Actually Prove?
3w ago00:43:25Tap to summarizeThree machine timestamps anchor the Nancy Guthrie disappearance in facts that can't be disputed. Her doorbell camera disconnected at 1:47 a.m. Twenty-five minutes later, the software detected a person at the door. At 2:28 a.m., the pacemaker monitoring her heart lost its signal — with her phone still inside the house she never re-entered. Forty-one minutes. That's the window.The FBI released the doorbell footage on February 10. A man in a ski mask, gloves, a jacket, and a holstered handgun approached the front door carrying a 25-liter Ozark Trail Hiker Pack — a backpack the bureau says is sold exclusively at Walmart. He discovered the camera in real time, reached down, pulled weeds from Nancy's own yard, and covered the lens. As of the FBI's last public statement, the man has not been publicly identified.Blood confirmed as Nancy's was found on the front porch. She left behind her phone, wallet, and the medication she reportedly needs daily. Discarded gloves were recovered approximately two miles from the property. The family found her gone, called for help within minutes, and a full response deployed — drones, K-9 units, and eventually more than a hundred investigators. No arrest has been made. Nancy Guthrie remains missing.Jennifer Coffindaffer spent 28 years at the FBI and walks through those forty-one minutes the way she was trained to process a scene. She examines what the timestamps reveal in sequence, why an 84-year-old dependent on daily medication turns every passing hour into a countdown, and what it means when a case with this much early evidence still produces no public identification of the suspect on camera.The investigation's credibility has been complicated by the Pima County sheriff's resume scandal and a recall campaign. The FBI Director publicly disputed the sheriff's characterization of the inter-agency relationship. The reward climbed from $50,000 to $1 million. The contamination questions around the initial canvass remain unresolved. Every open question in this case flows back to one: who is the masked figure on Nancy Guthrie's doorbell camera, and why hasn't that person been named?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBI #DoorbellCamera #Timestamps #MissingPerson #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TucsonArizona
Transcribe →What Does The Letter Kouri Richins Hid In An LSAT Book Reveal About Her Psychology?
4w ago00:32:55Tap to summarizeDeputies found a six-page letter inside an LSAT prep book in Kouri Richins' jail cell while she was being treated for a medical episode. The letter scripted her brother's testimony. When confronted, she didn't deny writing it. She said it was part of a fictional novel about a Mexican prison.That explanation is the psychology in miniature. Every threat Kouri Richins faced produced a story. Not a careful lie — an automatic narrative, generated under pressure the way a reflex fires before conscious thought arrives. Her first attorney withdrew citing ethical issues. She told an admirer from jail that she'd "expose this county, the prosecution, the judge, the Richins, the investigation." She reframed Eric's family as jealous competitors rather than grieving relatives. The pattern isn't strategic. It's mechanical — a story-generating system that cannot be turned off even when the stories are making everything worse.That mechanism was put to its ultimate test during the trial itself. Kouri's attorneys made the call: zero witnesses. No defense case. Three weeks of prosecution testimony with nothing from the defense table. Her housekeeper described the fentanyl transaction. Her boyfriend broke down on the stand. A forensic accountant dismantled the image of financial success and exposed approximately $4.5 million in debt underneath it. Kouri sat through all of it in silence.The psychology of that silence is specific. A mind built on narrative production — a person whose entire coping architecture depends on generating stories to explain, deflect, and reframe — was ordered by her own attorneys to produce nothing. The stillness that resulted wasn't composure. It was overload. A circuit breaker tripping because the incoming information had nowhere to go inside a system that doesn't process reality without first converting it into a story she can control.The jury needed less than three hours. Every count. Guilty. The speed of the verdict told Kouri something nobody in her life had ever told her — she wasn't even a hard question.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylPoisoning #Psychology #WitnessIntimidation #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #SummitCounty #JusticeForEric
Transcribe →What Relationship Dynamics Did The Mackenzie Shirilla Trial Ignore?
4w ago00:37:58Tap to summarizeThe prosecution built its case on a breakup — Dominic Russo was leaving, Mackenzie Shirilla couldn't handle it, and she drove into a building at nearly a hundred miles per hour. Netflix's The Crash reinforced that framing. But a psychotherapist who has spent three decades in domestic violence and forensic mental health says the relationship between Mackenzie and Dominic was far more complicated than either the trial or the documentary allowed.Constant breakups and reconciliations. Explosive fights. Threats from both sides. An incident on I-71 where the prosecution presented a friend's testimony that Mackenzie threatened to crash the car — while text messages showed Mackenzie told Dominic's mother it was actually Dom who grabbed the wheel. Two completely different accounts of the same violent moment. The defense never challenged the prosecution's version. The jury heard one side.Shavaun Scott examines what these dynamics actually reveal clinically. What happens when two young people are locked in a cycle they can't exit? Why does a breakup feel like an identity collapse for someone with Mackenzie's psychological profile? How do self-harm threats function inside a volatile relationship — and do they indicate premeditated intent or emotional deregulation? The texts were ugly. The threats were real. But what they reveal about the internal psychology is fundamentally different from what the prosecution used them to prove.Scott also takes on the memory claim that has defined the post-conviction conversation. Mackenzie maintains she blacked out. The families say she's lying. An inmate who spent six months with her describes someone unrecognizable from the Netflix portrayal. But dissociative amnesia is a documented clinical phenomenon — and Scott explains that trauma-induced memory loss looks almost exactly like what Mackenzie describes. She examines whether someone can genuinely not distinguish between forgetting and suppressing, what the medical evidence suggests about consciousness at the moment of impact, and a possibility that cuts against everything the public believes about this case — that premeditated murder may not be what happened in that car.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TheCrashNetflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RelationshipDynamics #DissociativeAmnesia
Transcribe →What Does A Psychotherapist See In Mackenzie Shirilla That The Trial Never Considered?
4w ago00:37:17Tap to summarizeThe prosecution called Mackenzie Shirilla cold and calculated. A judge called her "hell on wheels." The public split into two camps after Netflix's The Crash — she's a monster or she's innocent. But a psychotherapist who has spent three decades inside the minds of people who harm others sees a clinical picture that's messier than either side wants it to be.Shavaun Scott is a licensed psychotherapist, author of The Minds of Mass Killers, and has worked in domestic violence shelters, forensic settings, and crisis teams. She examines what's operating underneath Mackenzie Shirilla's personality — the narcissism that presents as confidence but clinically almost never is, the self-obsession that masks profound fragility, and the fundamental question the trial never addressed: whether a seventeen-year-old's volatile behavior represents a fixed personality disorder or an adolescent brain that hasn't finished developing. The texts were ugly. The threats were real. But what they reveal about Mackenzie's inner world clinically is very different from what the prosecution used them to establish at trial.Scott's analysis sits alongside a post-conviction strategic breakdown that raises equally uncomfortable questions. Shirilla agreed to appear in the Netflix documentary from prison. She was soft-spoken and remorseful on camera. Within days, a fellow inmate described a completely different person behind bars. The internet turned on her harder than before. Her pre-crash social media is still circulating — screenshots used to define who she is. The families are more vocal than ever. Dominic's sister has a podcast. The parents appeared in the documentary.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta advises clients on post-conviction strategy. He examines every decision Mackenzie has made since the verdict — the documentary, the public persona, the persistent "I don't remember" — and asks whether any of it helps at a parole hearing or whether she's actively burying herself deeper. Her appeals are exhausted. Her first parole date isn't until 2037. The question isn't whether she's guilty anymore. It's whether she understands what she needs to do next — and whether anyone around her is giving her that guidance.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TheCrashNetflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #ShavaunScott #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology
Transcribe →What Does Blanca Simpson Know About The Morning After The Murdaugh Murders That She Was Never Asked?
4w ago00:43:34Tap to summarizeThe South Carolina Supreme Court stripped away twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony. What fills that gap at retrial may depend on the kind of evidence that didn't get its full day in court the first time — and Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson has had three years to sit with what she saw versus what prosecutors actually asked her about.She testified for three hours in 2023. The jury heard about the shirt, the towel, the pajamas. But Blanca knew that household in a way no investigator could replicate. Which cabinets Maggie used. Where the towels went. What the morning routine looked like. When she walked into the house twelve hours after the murders, she saw things that didn't fit — small domestic details a forensic team would walk past but a woman who'd been there every day for twenty years would catch immediately.In this exclusive, Blanca reveals what she noticed that nobody asked about on the stand. She walks through the morning after — Alex's phone call, the condition of the house, the things that were moved, cleaned, or wrong — and draws the line between grief and scene management. She confronts the moment Alex returned months later to rewrite the shirt story. And she addresses what a jury loses now that Moselle has been sold and broken apart — what her memory of that property can give a second jury that photographs alone cannot.Blanca also presents her own theory of the crime — and it directly challenges the defense team's "other suspects" strategy. She believes Alex had a Plan A involving someone else at Moselle that night. When that plan collapsed, he executed Plan B himself and constructed a narrative around the boat crash families. Her basis isn't speculation. It's twenty years of watching Alex Murdaugh operate — how he moved money through other people's hands, how he used relationships as cover, how Curtis Eddie Smith cashed four hundred thirty-seven checks totaling roughly $2.4 million. Alex built an infrastructure of people who did things for him. If he never operated alone in any other part of his life, Blanca asks, why would the murders be the one exception?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughRetrial #MaggieMurdaugh #Moselle #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughEvidence #CurtisSmith #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →Why Didn't Mackenzie Shirilla's Defense Call The One Expert Who Could Have Changed Everything?
4w ago00:47:55Tap to summarizeThe defense raised a medical condition that could have explained the Strongsville crash. Then they never called an expert to testify about it. No medical records entered. No testimony. The prosecution's intent narrative went unchallenged on the point that could have introduced reasonable doubt — and a jury never heard an alternative explanation for why the car hit that building at nearly a hundred miles per hour.After Mackenzie Shirilla was convicted of four counts of murder for the crash that killed Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan, a neurologist reviewed her records and found evidence consistent with a medical episode — loss of consciousness, no head trauma, low blood oxygen. That opinion was submitted in a post-conviction petition. The court denied it. Not because the medical evidence lacked merit — the filing arrived one day past Ohio's 365-day statutory deadline.The failures compound. The prosecution presented an I-71 incident as proof of prior calculation — a friend testified Mackenzie threatened to crash the car. Text messages showed Mackenzie told Dominic's mother that Dom was the one who grabbed the wheel. Two versions of the same moment. The defense didn't challenge the prosecution's account. The prosecution's forensic examiner testified to no mechanical failure. The defense brought no accident reconstruction expert to offer an alternative reading of the physical evidence.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines each failure and whether the cumulative weight meets the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel. The question isn't only whether Mackenzie is guilty — it's whether she was ever given the tools to mount a real defense.Robin Dreeke brings FBI behavioral expertise to the competing narratives. Netflix's documentary shows Mackenzie soft-spoken and remorseful from prison. An inmate who spent six months with her describes someone unrecognizable from the woman on camera. The families need certainty the evidence may not fully support. Dreeke asks the hardest question: what if nobody in this case — not the families, not the prosecutor, not Mackenzie — actually knows the full truth?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TheCrashNetflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #IneffectiveCounsel
Transcribe →Is Blanca Simpson The Same Murdaugh Witness She Was In 2023?
4w ago00:34:52Tap to summarizeBlanca Turrubiate-Simpson spent twenty years inside the Murdaugh household. She fixed Alex's collar the morning of June 7th, 2021. She remembered the shirt. She found the wet towel by the shower the next day. She was the person Maggie cried to when Alex's finances were collapsing and nobody would explain why. She told all of it to a jury that convicted him in three hours. Then the Supreme Court erased the convictions — and Blanca drove straight to Maggie's grave without calling anyone first.In her first interview since the reversal, Blanca addresses the question that matters most heading into a retrial: is she the same witness she was in 2023? Three years of processing what she saw inside that family, what she knew before the killings, and what she's learned since — has any of it changed what she's prepared to say under oath? She talks about what she said to Maggie at the gravesite. Whether respecting the court's decision and believing Alex is guilty can exist in the same person. And what Becky Hill — a clerk writing a book about the trial while it was still happening — took from the people who loved Maggie and Paul.The investigative question runs parallel. Jennifer Coffindaffer approaches the Murdaugh case as a clean-slate thought experiment. Strip the name off the file. Two people shot at the dog kennels on a remote hunting property. Two different firearms — a shotgun and a rifle — neither recovered. No blood on the defendant. The defense has long argued no single shooter could have done it the way the state described. Paul Murdaugh's earlier legal troubles — including a boat crash that killed a young woman — left a trail of unresolved grudges.Coffindaffer examines where a scene like this points when you come at it with fresh eyes, what the two-weapon theory actually means for the prosecution, and whether the murder case the state built can survive scrutiny without the financial crimes testimony that carried it the first time. The conviction is gone. The question of who killed Maggie and Paul is open again. These two conversations are the starting point.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #JenniferCoffindaffer #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →