Transcript
A (0:00)
This is a bonus episode of history as it happens. It is December 1916. A trio of monarchists decides the only way to save the monarchy is to murder Grigori Rasputin, the Siberian peasant, adored by some, despised by others, known for his intense spiritualism and healing powers, but also corruption and criminal debauchery. So we're talking about something a little different on this episode. The fall of Tsarist Russia with one of the preeminent military historians in our world today, Sir Anthony Beaver, whose latest book is a biography, the Downfall of the Romanovs. It reads like a novel. Rasputin was a character so bizarre it is hard to believe he was a real person. Yet he endeared himself to Tsar Nicholas II and the Empress because of his ability to calm their son, the heir to the throne, when he suffered painful, life threatening bouts of hemophilia. If Rasputin had stuck to giving spiritual advice and healing the Tsarevich, history might have turned out differently for the autocracy. But his drunken, carousing, lecherous conduct brought disrepute on the royal family. And his meddling in affairs of state was disastrous. It is a case study in how an individual, even a Siberian peasant, can change the course of history. Antony Beaver, welcome back.
B (1:28)
Great to be back with you, Martin.
A (1:30)
So why a book about Rasputin?
B (1:32)
Well, Rasputin actually is in a way, a key to understanding the origins of how he got to World War II and beyond. Kerensky. Alexander Kerensky, the leader of the Provisional Government after the revolution of February 1917, later said, without Rasputin, there would have been no Lenin. And I've always been intrigued about sort of the process, the sequence of events leading on to the revolution in Russia, because the First World War was the original catastrophe, but it was the Russian Revolution and the Civil War which actually created the pattern for conflict in the 20th century. And even to a certain degree, what we are seeing today, where the autocracies have actually followed on from the communist states. So we really do, I think, need to understand how one single person, and this is a contradiction of the great man theory of history, but we need to understand how one person, basically semi illiterate peasant from Siberia, could have had such a catastrophic effect on the Romanov dynasty and the effect of fake news as well, of the rumors and all the rest of it, which is something we're again seeing today. But at the time it was the rumors that Rasputin was sleeping with the Empress, that the Tsar was a cuckold. This completely undermined the respect in A patriarchal society like tsarist Russia, he completely undermined the influence and the respect that Tsar Nicholas II had.
