Transcript
A (0:00)
This is a bonus episode of history as it happens. It's November 26, 2025. It's been a generation since the US invaded Iraq. The invaders were not greeted as liberators. Years of violent insurgencies and sectarian strife followed. And today Iran, by virtue of the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein, wields significant influence in Baghdad. According to Freedom House, Iraq is not a free country. The democratic governance is impeded in practice by corruption, militias operating outside the bounds of the law, and the weakness of formal institutions. State officials and powerful militias routinely infringe on the rights of citizens through legal and extrajudicial means. Iraq lacks independent media, and religious and academic freedom are severely restricted. But Iraq does have competitive elections. This month, Prime Minister Mohammed al Sudani's political bloc won the most seats in Parliament, Reuters reports a new could still be months away due to wrangling. To build a majority, the next government will need to navigate the delicate balance between US And Iranian influence. It must manage dozens of armed groups that are closer to Iran and answerable more to their own leaders than to the state, all while facing growing pressure from Washington to dismantle those militias. The report goes on to say Sudani's list came in first with 46 seats in the 329 member parliament. The Takaddoum party, which draws support from Iraq's mainly Sunni west and north, won 27 seats. Former Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki State of law group won 29, and the Kurdistan Democratic Party secured 26. The final total turnout in Iraq's parliamentary election was 56%. Parties in Iraq's Shiite ruling alliance say it'll move ahead with nominating a prime minister for the next phase of this process. Suidani had been seeking a second term in the election, but many disillusioned young voters saw the vote simply as a vehicle for established parties to divide Iraq's oil wealth, according to the Reuters report. So what to make of all this? Let's talk to Adam Weinstein, the deputy director of the Middle East Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, whose current research focuses on security and law in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq. Adam Weinstein, welcome back to the show.
B (2:24)
Thanks for having me.
A (2:25)
So we'll get to the Iraqi elections in a second, but I think we should start off with Dick Cheney, since he just died recently in his legacy vis a vis Iraq. How do ordinary people, ordinary Iraqis, feel about him? Or More broadly, the US invasion of 2003? Now that Iraq has achieved a modicum.
B (2:45)
Of stability, it's hard to say, because first of all, I don't think ordinary Iraqis think about Dick Cheney at all. But to the extent they think about what he represents, which is the U.S. invasion, you know, it depends what kind of Iraqi you are. If you occurred in the north of Iraq and the invasion was kind of a good thing for you, you established a quasi state. If you're a Sunni in western Iraq, it wasn't that great for you. You lost all your privilege. And if you were a Shia, it was a mixed bag. You got control over your country in a sense. But obviously everyone suffered under the Iraq war. I think a lot of Iraqis, other than perhaps some Sunni supporters of Saddam and many Sunnis, don't support Saddam. But there is a subset that might long for the days of Saddam. But I think the average Iraqi who lived through the Saddam era is happy he's gone, but is disappointed in Washington's follow through. Some of that is because they have expectations that are a little bit unrealistic. I mean, you'll sit down and talk to Iraqis and they'll be like, why can't America come reform our education system? Well, we can't even reform our own education system. I just saw stats that suggest that near half of U.S. high school graduates aren't proficient in math or reading. So I'm not sure why you'd want us to design your education system. But so they'll have expectations like that. And some of them are disappointed, of course, about the excesses that the killing, the raids, the murder of civilians during the war. And then the younger generation, you know, they don't even remember Saddam.
