Loading summary
A
This is a bonus episode of history as it happens. It's January 14, 2026. In Venezuela, it is all about the oil. But why?
B
Decades ago, the United States built Venezuela's oil industry, a tremendous expense with American skill, technology, know how, and dollars. But those assets were stolen from us, and we had presidents did nothing about it.
A
That was President Trump speaking at a White House roundtable with oil executives about his plans to exploit Venezuela's crude oil reserves, the largest known reserves in the world. Well, since US Special forces snatched Nicolas Maduro and hauled him back to New York City, Americans have been asking a lot of questions about Venezuela, whose economy has collapsed despite or because of its heavy reliance on oil. There are also questions concerning who would stand to benefit from extracting and selling more Venezuelan oil in a global market where there is no shortage right now. Well, the Venezuelan government does need the revenue. The New York Times reports the US Is now brokering the sale of millions of barrels of Venezuelan oil, which have been trapped in the country since the Trump administration started a partial blockade against tankers carrying crude from Venezuela. This involves about 50 million barrels of oil now in storage, and the sale is designed to prevent the collapse of Venezuela's oil industry, its main source of revenue. If the oil business were to collapse, the country would unravel and then the Trump administration would not be able to pursue its longer term plans to extract the crude reserves. The US Blockade already had Venezuela on the brink of a humanitarian crisis, unable to sell the oil in its limited storage facilities. The article goes on to say two global commodity trading companies are handling this sale and for about $50 a barrel, a big increase over the roughly $30 that the country was getting for the oil that it had previously exported to China to circumvent American sanctions. So what would come after this initial sale? Are US Oil companies clamoring to return to exploit what one former Venezuelan oil minister called the devil's excrement? With Washington running the country's oil industry, supposedly for the benefit of its citizens. You know, it was petroleum that once brought Venezuela prosperity and stability during an era when countries were nationalizing their industries after decades of foreign domination and when OPEC began to set prices, prosperity and stability as long as oil prices stayed high. In the early years, under Hugo Chavez, who was elected in 1998, Oil was selling for a about $10 a barrel. It reached a record $150 in 2008 before plummeting years later down to about $30 a barrel in 2016. This, combined with sanctions, destroyed Venezuela's economy. Giuliano Garavini teaches international history at Roma Tre University in Rome. He specializes in European integration, decolonization in the global south, the history of energy and natural resources. Giuliano Garavini, welcome to the show.
C
Thanks for having me.
A
Grazie. I have been taking Italian lessons. However, if I were to try to have an entire conversation with you about oil in Italian, no one, including you and me, would enjoy it. I have to keep working. Let's dive into the subject. Why did Venezuela nationalize its oil industry in the 1970s and how did that affect the US oil companies there?
C
The starting point is that most of the countries that were members of OPEC in one way or the other, either they nationalized oil or they got majority participation, which is more or less the same as nationalizing oil in the 1970s. So the most symbolic moment of that movement was when Algeria nationalized its oil in 1971. And the objective of all these countries independently from their governments. So Algeria had a socialist dealing government, Saudi Arabia, absolute monarchy. Venezuela was a democratic government was basically for all of them to gain direct control over the most important resource and the one that provided most of the income for the state. And what specifically happened in Venezuela is that a law decided nationalization of void which meant that the concessions operated by foreign companies in Venezuela were taken over by a newly formed company called Pedevesa Petroleo de Venezuela. And this new company, basically headed by Venezuelans, would now manage all the former concessions and oil fields that were also under American supervision.
A
You've been listening to a preview of this bonus episode. To listen to the entire episode and enjoy all bonus content, go to historyasithappens.com and become a subscriber. For $5 a month, you'll enjoy ad free listening bonus content and 24, 7 access to the entire catalog of more than 500 shows since early 2021. Again, that is historyasithappens.com or tap. Subscribe now in the show.
Host: Martin Di Caro
Guest: Giuliano Garavini (International Historian, Roma Tre University)
Date: January 14, 2026
This bonus episode explores Venezuela’s tumultuous oil history and its seismic impact on both local and global politics. With recent US intervention in Venezuela and shifting strategies regarding oil sales, the episode digs into how twentieth-century decisions, nationalization trends, and enduring reliance on oil revenue have led to the current crisis—and what might come next.
The episode opens by discussing Venezuela’s central role in global oil, emphasizing that even today, its fate often appears determined by who controls and exploits its vast reserves.
Former President Trump’s previously recorded remarks highlight historical American investment and technological leadership in building Venezuela’s oil industry, and recent grievances over “assets stolen” following nationalization:
Discussion about the return of US oil companies and Washington’s possible direct management of Venezuela’s oil “supposedly for the benefit of its citizens.”
Host Martin Di Caro traces Venezuela’s oil-driven rise and fall:
Guest Segment:
OPEC states (including Venezuela, Algeria, Saudi Arabia) sought to secure direct national control over oil production, maximizing state income and autonomy from foreign (especially US) corporations.
In Venezuela, this meant laws that transferred foreign-operated concessions to the new state oil company, PDVSA (Petróleos de Venezuela), led by Venezuelan management.
The nationalization meant large-scale technical and managerial transformation as Venezuelans replaced foreign executives, marking a new era of resource sovereignty.
Trump’s historical grievance:
“But those assets were stolen from us, and we had presidents did nothing about it.”
(Donald Trump – 00:19)
Host on US intervention:
“Since US Special Forces snatched Nicolas Maduro and hauled him back to New York City, Americans have been asking a lot of questions about Venezuela…”
(Martin Di Caro – 00:26)
On oil’s precarious prosperity:
“…prosperity and stability as long as oil prices stayed high.”
(Martin Di Caro – 02:36)
Garavini on OPEC and resource control:
“The objective...was basically for all of them to gain direct control over the most important resource and the one that provided most of the income for the state.”
(Giuliano Garavini – 03:53)
The episode strikes an analytical, sometimes urgent tone—reflecting both the sweeping historical perspective and the gravity of present-day political drama. Conversations stay factual, with splashes of dry humor and pointed reflection (as in Martin Di Caro’s playful mention of learning Italian, 03:21).
The episode vividly traces how Venezuela’s journey from oil-rich dynamo to crisis state was shaped by decisions of nationalization, resource dependency, foreign intervention, and turbulent geopolitics. As US policy takes center stage in Venezuela’s latest upheaval, both host and guest underline how history’s echoes are never far from today’s headlines—especially when oil is involved.