Loading summary
Host
Brian, you've accomplished what many of our listeners dream of doing, which is you've raised $5 billion across six funds. I want to start, though, when you started in 2011. Tell me about that very first fund.
Brian
I appreciate you saying such nice things about it. I remember when we started, I never knew what this was going to become. I was always just about putting one foot in front of the other and trying to be successful.
Mitchell
But back then, it was difficult.
Brian
I would say that the.
Mitchell
The idea behind what we were doing.
Brian
Was that we were going to create a new type of fund. I started my career at a firm called Bessemer Venture Partners, and I worked with my partner, Mitchell, and my partner Mitchell really was the one that spearheaded the initial fundraise, and I joined right in the middle of fund one.
Mitchell
When he did that fundraise, the concept was pretty simple. And the idea was instead of raising.
Brian
Money from lots of institutional investors, let's try raising money from individuals. And if we raise money from these.
Mitchell
Individuals, we could then have them help.
Brian
Our portfolio companies, and we'd be very upfront and transparent about what we were trying to do.
Mitchell
And it was a model that we.
Brian
Just aren't familiar with and really hadn't been tried out all that much.
Mitchell
So Mitchell has an unbelievable presence about.
Brian
Him and a way in which to sort of engage with folks.
Mitchell
And probably, I think a lot of them invested, so he stopped bothering them, and they ended up putting capital into.
Brian
The fund, and we're off to the races. That first fund was a $52 million fund. We raised money from about a hundred individual investors.
Mitchell
And you mentioned a lot of people.
Brian
Would look at the success that we've had as a firm, would appreciate that.
Mitchell
I'd say that early on, the advice.
Brian
That I would give is start small. It's really hard to get institutional investors attention. Many of them need to write bigger checks. It's hard to sort of compel them in a way.
Mitchell
And getting individuals on board was a.
Brian
Really powerful thing for us because you always felt the success building. You're able to talk to a lot of individuals. Many times, they're able to make those commitments very quickly. They decide that they like you, and.
Mitchell
Because of that, you feel the snowball.
Brian
Rolling down the hill and building, building, building. And that's a really good thing for building momentum for the firm and always feeling like you're. Like you're going to be successful.
Host
Rahul McDonald's, who jumped on the podcast, he talks about just how busy institutional investors are. He had a billion dollar, one billion foundation so not, not a small, but not by any means a large foundation. And the CIO told him that he had over 900 voicemails the previous year, not even from funds that they had invested in, and not even funds that they were looking at, but in funds that had cold outreach to him. Just to give you a sense for how busy institutional investors are. But you went to the other barbell, which is high net worth individuals. And you also married your capital base to your value add to portfolio companies. Tell me how you went about doing that.
Brian
Our LPA's today we have about 700 individual limited partners, many of whom have built, run, managed some of the world's best businesses. And we're very upfront with them when they invest. We say don't invest unless you're willing to help the portfolio companies.
Mitchell
Now what you notice oftentimes is a lot of these folks, they, they want.
Brian
To find a place to invest and.
Mitchell
They want to find something that's comfortable to them. So whenever we're talking to executives that might have a pretty significant net worth, they're kind of plus or minus five years from retirement generally, and they're in a place where they've got to figure.
Brian
Out what to do with their money and they want to stay engaged. That's a good place for us to be having a conversation.
Mitchell
And usually the conversation goes something like.
Brian
Hey, so you are the former CFO of XYZ Company. It's a Fortune 500 business. Congratulations. That's amazing.
Mitchell
What are you investing in these days? And you'll oftentimes hear the exact same story, which is I was the CFO.
Brian
Of, I don't know, pick a Fortune 500 oil company, energy company, and you.
Mitchell
Say, what are you investing in? And they say, you know, my brother in law's friend got me involved in this biotech super interesting. I'm really excited by it. Like, okay, and what else? Well, my, my son's friend started a company and they have a social media website.
Brian
So. Okay, great.
Mitchell
So tell me a little bit about what compelled you to invest in those things. And I said, well I, I don't know, you know, I put $250,000 in each one and they keep calling me for more capital and that's what I'm doing. Okay, sometimes that works out. But your knee jerk reaction is someone who is the CFO of some Fortune 500 company. They're a genius and they know everything. And you know what, they probably are.
Brian
A genius insofar as that they're really.
Mitchell
Smart, but they don't necessarily have the.
Brian
Reps in terms of investing and looking at a lot of different things across a lot of different industries.
Mitchell
And what ends up happening is oftentimes whatever comes across their desk first is.
Brian
What they might actually end up investing in.
Mitchell
That creates a difficult dynamic because many of them end up kind of dejected and disappointed with the results.
Brian
They end up in companies where they're trying to help them, but the companies aren't really appropriate for them to be helping. They end up in situations where the companies are asking that person to tap their networks and that person doesn't necessarily want to do it because the company's.
Mitchell
Not doing that well.
Brian
That creates a difficult dynamic.
Mitchell
And so what we offer and what.
Brian
We talk to them about oftentimes is, look, that's great. You've got all these like early stage things. Tell me about what else.
Mitchell
And they'd say, well, my Goldman broker.
Brian
Put me into this big fund and maybe, maybe they have small exposure to Blackstone or to Goldman Sachs or something like that. And so it's like a barbell. There's nothing in between. There's these early stage things that they probably shouldn't be getting involved in. And then there's very late stage, much more institutionalized type offerings where they'll probably make good money, but they're not really having a sense of involvement.
Mitchell
And we say, look, we've got this framework and we've got a very specific.
Brian
Set of metrics that we follow, and we're constantly looking at these businesses and we love to engage you. And you were the CFO of an oil company.
Mitchell
How about when one of our companies.
Brian
Is looking to hire a cfo? Or how about if we're investing in a software company that sells into the energy sector, we'd tap you to help.
Mitchell
Would you be interested in that?
Brian
I say, well, that would be great.
Mitchell
And then I say to them, well, what if there were companies that are growing really fast and doing very well?
Brian
So I would love that too.
Mitchell
And that creates a very different dynamic. And by talking through that with people.
Brian
They start realizing, gosh, I might have.
Mitchell
Made some bad choices early on in.
Brian
What I'm investing in. On the early stage, I could get involved in things that are interesting to me. Let me push on that. And ultimately it's served us very well and served them very well.
Host
A couple of really important principles there is people forget that they are in a market. So that biotech startup is in a market, which means by the time it gets to the CFO's desk, hundreds of tens, if not hundreds of biotech companies have said no on that. The other aspect is style drift. So you're familiar with this in private equity. If you were to go from $50 million EBITDA companies to 150 million, a lot of LPs would have a lot of questions on why are you now doing $150 million company companies versus 50 million? And you might say, well, there's still the same widgets, there's the same management teams. But even that style drift of going 50 million middle market to upper middle market is scrutinized so heavily. Why is that? Because your other competition, that $150 million market, is the same level of intelligence, the same level of experience, the same level of deal flow. So when these CFOs are going to the biotech market, they're not only kind of picking, picking up one foot, pivot foot, they're like jumping to another whole part of the industry and a whole nother stage. And even if they could provide the value, which I'm sure they're actually providing some value, their deal flow is just abysmal.
Brian
I couldn't agree more.
Host
How do you manage having 700 LPs? And how does this practically help you win on the deal flow side when you're sourcing targets?
Mitchell
So the first question is how do.
Brian
We manage it all?
Mitchell
And it's been pretty organic over time. I'd say that we do a couple.
Brian
Of things order to maintain those relationships. So the first thing that we do is we probably have an inordinately large investor relations team. Right. And so the concept of just sort of fielding questions isn't something that we subscribe to. We actually have a couple of people who their sole job is to spend all of their waking hours meeting with and talking to our existing LPs. And so they're traveling around, they're spending time. And usually these are young folks who are engaged, who understand our business really well and they're spending time trying to understand our LPs and build relationship with them.
Mitchell
So that's from a day to day.
Brian
Standpoint, that's a lot of how we manage it.
Mitchell
Now, what are some of the things.
Brian
That we do to make sure that it's a good experience for both of us?
Mitchell
So the first thing that we do is when we have a new investor.
Brian
A new individual investor, what we'll do.
Mitchell
Is almost like an intake form and.
Brian
Really have a conversation with that person about what it is that is interesting to them in terms of being able.
Mitchell
To help businesses and what you'll realize.
Brian
Is different people want to help in different ways.
Mitchell
So you might talk to one investor.
Brian
That'S an lp, and they've come in.
Mitchell
They say, look, how do you want to help companies?
Brian
And they say, look, I've gone through IPOs.
Mitchell
I've gone through geographic expansion. If a company needs advice in any of those areas, I am so happy to help. But the one thing that I want to stay away from is I don't.
Brian
Love the concept of helping with customer intros. It makes me feel uncomfortable to make an introduction. I don't want to necessarily endorse anything.
Mitchell
I'd really rather not be asked because.
Brian
I feel like I'll be put in a tough position if you do that.
Mitchell
Okay, well, now you know what that person cares about. And then you might go to the.
Brian
Next person that's an LP who's new.
Mitchell
And you talk to them and you say. And they say, all I want to.
Brian
Do is open up my network.
Mitchell
I have so many relationships, I want to keep them fresh. People love hearing what I think is cool or interesting. I would love to make a lot.
Brian
Of introductions for the portfolio companies.
Mitchell
So anytime that you have an introduction.
Brian
That you think that I could make, just ask me. I'm sure that 95% of the time I'm going to be willing to do it.
Mitchell
Well, those are two very different attitudes across these folks. And you kind of know who's willing to play ball in what situation. Once you do that and you have.
Brian
That information logged properly and easily categorized.
Mitchell
Now you're in a situation where you actually know who to ask for different things. And when you have a company that's.
Brian
Looking to get some guidance on their.
Mitchell
IPO planning, send them to person number one. And when you have a company that says, gosh, I've been trying to bang.
Brian
Down the door at Coca Cola, selling them my software. It's been a difficult journey. I can't get to the right person.
Mitchell
Do you have someone that could help me? Maybe person number two knows somebody at.
Brian
Coca Cola and we could get that conversation flowing.
Mitchell
That's a lot of it. So on the front end, it's a.
Brian
Lot about communication and understanding how they want to help.
Mitchell
On the back end, it's about sending our team out to go spend a.
Brian
Lot of time with the. With the LPs.
Mitchell
Amongst a lot of other things that.
Brian
We do, I'll name two more dynamics or two more activities that we pursue.
Mitchell
Number one is we have a lot.
Brian
Of dinners with our LPs.
Mitchell
So we have about 16 or 17.
Brian
Dinners each year in different cities where we invite our LPs geographically to come.
Mitchell
Come to the dinner. And I will tell you, it started out as sort of like this awkward.
Brian
Thing where we're talking about our fund and spending some time with the LPs.
Mitchell
And now, 14 years into it, we have a lot of situations where people have been coming to these dinners for years and they get excited because they get to see people who are now old friends. They used to be new friends, now they're old friends. And it's great. And you start seeing these dynamics where people become friendly with each other, they do different deals together outside of us, and you start seeing them hang out with each other, even not under the lead edge umbrella.
Brian
I'll tell you a quick story. Like I was, I was just. I was skiing last winter with my family and I called one of our LPs who lives in Colorado and said, you know, I'm going to be in.
Mitchell
Town, let's go grab dinner. And he said, well, would you mind going with me and this third guy? I said, yeah, I know that third guy.
Brian
Absolutely.
Mitchell
He's one of our LPs. He said, yeah, I met him at your dinners. He happens to be in town. I met him down in one of.
Brian
Your Miami dinners when I was there.
Mitchell
And he's in town. He called me and I said, I didn't even know he was there. Okay, that's wonderful.
Brian
So now we're meeting up as a.
Mitchell
Group and I think that it's a.
Brian
Really powerful thing to have that network.
Mitchell
So that's the first thing that we.
Brian
Do is these dinners that I was going to mention.
Mitchell
And the second thing that I'd also mention is we have what's called the Next Gen event. And every quarter we do our Next gen teach in. And the concept of that is we end up talking about very basic topics in finance and do seminars and sessions for our LPs, but more importantly, oftentimes for their spouses and their children one day. In many cases it's a spouse or an ex of kin that's a child that's going to end up controlling the capital. And it's really kind of incumbent upon them to understand. What does it mean to invest in.
Brian
A private equity fund? What does it mean to invest in a public equity fund? What should we be looking for?
Mitchell
And we sort of teach on an objective basis and have these discussions. And oftentimes there's like three, 400 people that join. So that's been a powerful tool for.
Brian
Us to keep people engaged.
Mitchell
And then the Last thing that I'd mention, I guess, would be, we've always.
Brian
Been militant about our communication.
Mitchell
We have quarterly calls where we update.
Brian
On the portfolio for every one of our funds. We've done that every single quarter for the last 14 years. Nobody can ever accuse us of not sharing information.
Mitchell
It doesn't always go the way that we'd like.
Brian
But we're up front and we spend the time to communicate it. And I think that that builds a lot of trust.
Host
I recently heard a statistic that 60% of women of widows, when their husband passes away, change their financial advisors. So this people kind of take the next of kin or the widow or the family for granted when it comes to investing in LP relationships.
Brian
That's right.
Mitchell
And I'll tell you, we've seen it time and time again.
Brian
We've seen situations actually where unfortunate circumstances have taken place.
Mitchell
And oftentimes the LPs are calling us saying, okay, you were the one that.
Brian
The patriarch or matriarch or however it was trusted the most. What should we be doing? I don't know necessarily, but I'm happy that they trusted us and I'm more than happy to have a conversation with you to try to figure it out.
Mitchell
But that happens from time to time.
Brian
And we want to be someone and we want to be a group that people really trust. And I think that that's a powerful thing. I think a lot of it comes from the education that we provide and the fact that we're so straightforward and communicative.
Host
You mentioned you have two full time people that travel around and work with your LPs. What primarily are they doing and what's their week look like?
Brian
I get like an update from our team every week from a bunch of the different folks that work on our team, just about what their weeks look like. And if I opened up what those updates look like, you'd say, gosh, this looks crazy.
Mitchell
More or less.
Brian
It's just they'll, they'll pick out a city, they'll travel to it, and they'll reach out to everybody that's an LP beforehand and they'll try to schedule meetings with as many of them as they possibly can. So in a given week, you know, like Garrett, who works on our team, he might have 30 meetings in person, 40 meetings in person with LPs, and it's amazing. Like we, I'll talk to him and.
Mitchell
I'll say, okay, like, I haven't seen you in the office in three weeks. Be like, oh, I was in Austin last week for three days. Then I went to Dallas for two days. I was in Miami for three days. I went to Denver for three days.
Brian
Say, who do you see? And then I get the emails at the end of every week and it's like amazing.
Mitchell
And so keeping that engagement is really important because ultimately, when we ask the.
Brian
LPs for a little bit of help with our portfolio companies or whatever it.
Mitchell
Might be, we want them on the spot, we want them right there, willing to help and feeling like they're part of a team.
Brian
And if they don't feel like we're constantly catering to them, that sense of urgency isn't going to be there. And we want them to feel our sense of urgency and we want in turn to have them create that for themselves.
Host
There's an adage that's become so, so overused. It's trite. Build your well before you're thirsty. I think it's the name of the. And the reason is because most people do not build their well before they're thirsty.
Brian
My partner Mitchell is the best I've ever seen at this. It is, it is amazing. The guy is just, he's out there, he's talking to people and he's constantly asking the question, how could I help you?
Mitchell
And when you think about it through.
Brian
That lens and you frame it through that lens, what ends up happening is you end up being helpful to a lot of people and on the back end, a lot of people end up wanting to be helpful to you.
Host
We have this meme we create internally called Forced Value Add. Whenever we're on calls, we force the person to find a way that we could be helpful because we're building these, these long term games, playing these long term games with these partners. Moving over to the investing side, you look for eight key metrics before you invest in a company. What are those eight key metrics?
Mitchell
I'll share with you the key metrics.
Brian
In a moment, but let me first.
Mitchell
Speak to how that came into being.
Brian
So it might be helpful just for framing for you, because I'm not sure that we've spoken about this in the past.
Mitchell
About 20 years ago, I was hired.
Brian
To a firm called Bessemer Venture Partners to be the first person that they were hired to do cold calling. And they didn't even know exactly what they were looking for. When they hired me, they just said, we think that if we go outbound, we could find some really interesting deal opportunities.
Mitchell
And I met my partner Mitchell there and we started about the same time.
Brian
We start calling these companies and spending time with them.
Mitchell
And what would end up happening is every Monday, we were supposed to present.
Brian
To the partners at the firm, the different companies that we spoke to. And they were supposed to then pick which ones they wanted to follow up on. And they'd say, okay, Brian, this is great. You had. You left 112 voicemails this week. You wrote 140 emails. Wonderful. We're tracking you. You had 11 calls with CEOs.
Mitchell
Wonderful.
Brian
Which are the ones that we want to follow up on.
Mitchell
And when we first started, there was.
Brian
No framework around anything.
Mitchell
And I would say, guys, I got this amazing company.
Brian
Let me tell you about it.
Mitchell
The product is going to be unbelievable. The founder, they went to Harvard. It is great. Crazy, amazing. And they'd look at me and they'd say, all right, that's great, Brian. You know, so, like, how big is the company?
Brian
I said, oh, my God. I had to ask how big it. I don't know how big it is. Okay, well, get me a revenue scale.
Mitchell
Let's do this.
Brian
Don't bring any companies to me unless they're like $5 million plus in revenue. So, okay, fine. So you go back out, you do a bunch of calls. The next week, same thing happens.
Mitchell
Talk to another company, say, oh, I got this company. It's amazing. It's got this great product. I went to Harvard. It's another company, and they've got $7 million of revenue.
Brian
And they're like, okay, good, good.
Mitchell
All right, so how fast is it growing?
Brian
I'm like, oh, my God. I had to ask that question.
Mitchell
Jesus, I didn't know that.
Brian
Okay, we'll go back and find out.
Mitchell
So you could see where this is going, which is they kept asking lots of questions. And because they were asking lots of questions, it became harder and harder to.
Brian
Find companies that met all of their criteria.
Mitchell
And at a certain point when I was there, we got to about five or six criteria, and that was it.
Brian
And there were, like, no more questions that they were asking.
Mitchell
And they basically said to us, look, don't worry about what the company does.
Brian
And, and, and. And all of the framing around it.
Mitchell
The first thing we want you to.
Brian
Talk about is how many of the metrics it meets.
Mitchell
Once you tell us that and it's qualified as a lead based upon the number of metrics, then let's talk about.
Brian
All of those exciting things. Why the company is so amazing, what their business model is, what their product is.
Mitchell
And that's more or less how we've.
Brian
Decided to run our firm at Lead Edge.
Mitchell
So we're thematic we try to understand the various industries.
Brian
We try to get really smart about different companies.
Mitchell
But we really try to stick to.
Brian
A very deliberate framework in terms of the metrics of the company. So back to your question of what the Lead Edge 8 criteria are.
Mitchell
It's revenue.
Brian
We're looking for companies $10 million and up in revenue. It's growth rate.
Mitchell
A lot of companies, a lot of.
Brian
Investors might make money through leverage or through buying things super cheap.
Mitchell
We make money through growth.
Brian
So we look for companies 25, 30% growth rate annually at a minimum. We look for companies that have high gross margins. Many companies that we look at are not yet profitable. Some are, but many are not. And so gross margins are a good indicator of future profitability.
Mitchell
We look for companies that are kind.
Brian
Of profitable or breakeven in a perfect world.
Mitchell
Then we have a series of non sort of P and L metrics.
Brian
So there's recurring revenue. Is the business recurring revenue business high retention rates. So we look for companies with like 90% plus gross retention. It's probably the most important metric that we track. We look for businesses with a nice diverse customer base. If they only have three customers and you lose one, the business is going to go under. That's a real problem. So you want to be able to sleep at night. And then last, we look at the.
Mitchell
Unit economics and for us, that's sort.
Brian
Of like a return on equity type.
Mitchell
Metric based upon the amount of cash.
Brian
That the company has burned historically, how big is the business? And we see way too many businesses that have burned through a hundred million dollars to get to 10 million of revenue. It's just not an efficient business. It might be perfectly good, it might be super technologically advanced. Other people can invest in those types of things. We're going to look at that 1 to 1, 2 to 1 type ratio.
Mitchell
If you burn through 10 million, maybe.
Brian
You'Re around 10 million in revenue. Something in that neighborhood feels good to us. And we judge every company based upon that metric stream. And once we do that, it kind of leads us to where we should end up.
Sponsor/Announcer
Support for today's episode comes from Square. The easy way for business owners to take payments, book appointments, manage staff, and keep everything running in one place. One of my favorite local cafes here in New York uses Square. And it's honestly one of the reasons I keep coming back. The checkout is lightning fast. Receipts are seamless, and even their loyalty program runs through square. Businesses using Square feel professional and provide a frictionless customer experience. Square works wherever your customers are, at a counter, online or even on your phone. Everything syncs in real time. It helps you manage sales, inventory and reports all in one place. So you could spend more time growing your business and and less time on administrative tasks. With Square, you get all the tools to run your business with none of the contracts or complexity. And why wait? Right now you could get up to 200 off Square hardware at square.com go/howinvest. That's square.com go howi invest. Run your business smarter with Square. Get started today.
Host
You're check size is typically 50 to 300 million. So you're really brushing up some very competitive companies with, with very fierce competitors going after those companies. How do you win in this kind of market?
Mitchell
It's not always easy.
Brian
And I think that there's a couple of different ways that I would cite. Number one is RLP based. So we've already talked about this a little bit, but I think that we have a really unique differentiator in regard to how we're constructed. So because we're communicating with our LPs and saying don't invest unless you're willing.
Mitchell
To help the portfolio companies, I think.
Brian
That that gives us a leg up during the courting process because what we're.
Mitchell
Able to do oftentimes is make a lot of really great introductions to the prospect companies. And if you're courting a business and trying to learn more about it, it's.
Brian
Really great if you could introduce that healthcare software business to the CEO of a big hospital system that could oftentimes work wonders.
Mitchell
And because we're able to do that.
Brian
And because there's always more to go back to in the well, because we.
Mitchell
Have so many LPs, the companies that we're spending time with really feel like, gosh, not only are they helping me.
Brian
Now, but I really feel like they're going to be helpful throughout the deal life cycle.
Mitchell
So that's kind of like thing number.
Brian
One that we do is like we meet, we left there.
Host
Is there an art to that in that there's a optimal frontier of how much value add you provide before you win the win you, you win the deal. Or is it just give as much value add to get the deal closed? And then as you mentioned, you have, you have just this well of a. You could, you could give a lot.
Brian
Of it is what you talked about before, which is like what's the force value add?
Mitchell
You're going to ask that question.
Brian
We always ask that question. I've been asking a question for 20 years. It is usually when we're talking to a company that's, you know, we're starting to discuss it is two questions. Number one, what do you feel like you need help with? And then number two, what do you feel like you're doing uniquely well?
Mitchell
And what you're doing with those two questions is when you're asking what they.
Brian
Need help with or what they're doing poorly or feel like they're not as efficient with, you're figuring out a way that you could alleviate some of that issue by helping them.
Mitchell
And when you're asking them what they're.
Brian
Uniquely good at, people generally love to talk about the things that they're uniquely good at.
Mitchell
And so ultimately, what ends up happening is if you find that thing, then.
Brian
Oftentimes you could leverage those folks to say, okay, we could. Well, let me connect you with somebody else, because they need help with that thing that you're uniquely good at. And it creates a. That's what creates a network effect to the whole thing.
Host
When I met Blake Sholl from founder of Boom Supersonic, he asks. He frames, and he asks things in such a way that is incredibly powerful. He once had breakfast with Richard Branson. He needed him to write loi. He had nothing. He had his model supersonic jet, and he was going to YC demo day with nothing. And he framed it so elegantly. Before he even sat down with Richard Branson, he ba. The first thing he said is, richard, I'm not here to ask for your money.
Brian
Right, yeah.
Host
That's been. They were pitching for 15 minutes, and Richard's like, oh, you know, I don't know. Some of the parts he liked, some of the parts he didn't. And he said, richard, I'm not asking you to believe. I'm not asking you to believe that this will work. But if we do accomplish what I say we will accomplish, do you want the first flat to have a virgin logo on it?
Brian
There you go.
Host
And he ended up getting the loi and, you know, now it's revolutionizing private aviation. So that video really got me thinking about the power of questions and framing. Said two great questions, which is, what do you need help with? And what are you uniquely good at? What are some other powerful questions that you've asked out your career that have gotten you great answers or that really help. Helped accelerate your career?
Mitchell
Gosh, that's a really good question.
Host
They set the standard high with your two questions.
Mitchell
Those two questions that I outlined before.
Brian
Are probably like our best two. And there's the most bang for the buck. Oftentimes when you say how do you need help? It doesn't necessarily translate to who could I introduce you to? And I think that one of the other questions that's always very powerful is who could I introduce you to? Or who do you want to meet?
Mitchell
Because it might not necessarily be that.
Brian
They feel like they need help with something. It might just be that they want some knowledge or to pick somebody's brain more proactively that might be a luminary in their field or something along those lines.
Mitchell
So we end up having a lot of situations where when you ask how do you need help? They might identify some specific tactical thing.
Brian
And you could figure out who to introduce them to for that.
Mitchell
But when you ask who they want to meet, that ends up being a.
Brian
Different, a slice of the conversation. And oftentimes if it's a software company that, let's say, sells into banks, they might want to meet certain bank executives that might not even work at the banks anymore, but that they just consider luminaries in the field or would want to learn from. And that, that also is a, is a good, you know, strength to pull on.
Host
So I've been thinking about this paradox where some of the most successful entrepreneurs or managers, they want both advice and also introductions. And some of the mediocre ones just want introductions because they have this blind spot where they think, well, I'm perfect, I don't need anything, if only I you just got me to a customer, everything else would be fine. Do you find this, that this humility is a necessary component in order to scale an enterprise?
Mitchell
The best, the best situations for us.
Brian
And the best things that I see in companies are very self aware people who are managing the company. And when they feel like they're not doing something as well or not able to do something as well, they're willing to ask for the help. And it's usually not that we can give them the help. I haven't run a company that's a 300 person software company, so it'd be unfair of me to say that I could definitively help them. I could give them some guidance based on other things that I've seen, but I wasn't necessarily in the trenches. Where we can help is by making those, you know, the right introductions, the people that have been there and done that before. And that's why we've created the firm in the way in which we've created it.
Mitchell
Now, that being said, I've seen both.
Brian
Ends of the spectrum. I'd say on balance, the bell curve would be, you know, People that are going to be the most successful are going to be self aware. They're going to ask for advice and they're going to ask for introductions and they're not worried about that.
Mitchell
But I've also seen other ends of the Bell curve. And so I've seen people who are.
Brian
Successful and they're an outlier, but they are completely self unaware. And actually that self unawareness is the best thing about them because they are not afraid to ask for anything, anything. And they will follow up with you a hundred times. And that's what makes them special and unique. And if you put other people around them that could make their shortcomings improve.
Mitchell
That can work.
Brian
And I've seen that work really well.
Mitchell
And I've seen other people that are.
Brian
Super bashful about asking certain things. I'd say on balance that really usually is not the best situation. And usually it's either because they're super arrogant and they don't want the help, or they're bashful and shy. And in either case that's probably not the best thing.
Mitchell
But on the other end of the.
Brian
Spectrum, I definitely have seen people who are totally self unaware and it's the best thing that ever happened to them.
Host
Sometimes the, the flaw could be the feature. Just use Bitcoin as an example. It's not very flexible. You can't change the rules. And that's what's made it such a great store of value. People criticize that, but that is the thing that, that's, that's what it's basically.
Brian
Doing for the market a hundred percent. And there are just people out there that I've seen that are willing to ask for things that other people aren't willing to ask for. They're willing to think about things that are other people don't think or they.
Mitchell
Should concern themselves thinking about.
Brian
And because of that they end up having the largest outlier results oftentimes. And I think that that's, that's great.
Mitchell
But as far as the Bell curve.
Brian
In general, I'd say that most people that are, that are going to be successful are going to ask for that advice and ask for the networking and some balanced question.
Host
You've grown from 52 million to 5 billion over six funds. What things have grown exponentially and compounded exponentially versus linearly. Which things get significantly easier? In which things just are always hard or just you need to put more bodies onto it?
Brian
The things that compound exponentially are a fewfold.
Mitchell
First of all.
Brian
Are pattern recognition. So because we see so many things you're able to put together a lot of patterns that you might not otherwise put together when we first started. And I think that you only get the benefit of that through having a large funnel of deal opportunities, having capital.
Mitchell
To put behind that, being able to.
Brian
Have legitimate conversations with companies and, and people taking you seriously.
Mitchell
When that happens, you just, you see a lot.
Brian
And so that pattern recognition, I think, is turbocharged as you see more and more things and as you have more capital and more scale, you see all different types of deals.
Mitchell
So that.
Brian
Absolutely.
Mitchell
I think that the network effect of.
Brian
The overall LP base, for us, at least at Lead Edge, that's improved exponentially because what ends up happening is you start with a bunch of relationships and you're kind of begging people for money. And that's how the whole thing began.
Mitchell
But today we get introductions weekly where.
Brian
One of our LPs says, hey, you should meet this person.
Mitchell
Go meet Tom Smith, he just retired.
Brian
As the CFO of this Fortune 500 company. Or meet Jen Smith, she just retired as the head of sales for this company. They should be investors with you.
Mitchell
And so it has become increasingly, I.
Brian
Don'T want to say easy because it's always hard, but it's become increasingly.
Host
More.
Brian
Reasonable to find people that are interested in what we're doing because we have such a referral base.
Mitchell
So that's absolutely.
Brian
We've done well with that.
Mitchell
I think that the things that become.
Brian
Hard and more scale linearly is we have a number of portfolio companies.
Mitchell
As the firm grows, inevitably you're going.
Brian
To have certain companies that have just been the portfolio for a while. They haven't necessarily lived up to expectations.
Mitchell
Those types of businesses end up creating an immense amount of pressure because you have to spend time with them and you've made a commitment to that management.
Brian
Team that you're going to try to help them improve themselves and see them.
Mitchell
Through growth and see them through an exit. And when you're just starting out, you have no baggage in that regard.
Brian
There's no extra companies, there's no old portfolio companies that you have, there's no boards that you're sitting on.
Mitchell
So you could just spend 100% of your time finding that next great thing. And when you move and you fast.
Brian
Forward into it, you say, okay, hold.
Mitchell
On, look, a bunch of companies that, like they've been sitting around for a while. What are we doing with these?
Brian
How are we going to exit them? What's our plan?
Mitchell
And that creates friction and that scales.
Brian
Linearly, but it does create, you know, an imbalance to some degree. And you have to be able to manage that. I think that we're uniquely managing it, but it's hard.
Host
One of the things that you're maybe implying and not saying is that those are the most difficult portfolio companies to deal with and the most thankless. So it's very hard to hire. It's like, go do this very thankless, difficult job. So you end up having to own more of that as senior leadership.
Mitchell
That is largely correct, I think.
Brian
Look, for us, we invest in the growth equity space. We've had very few, like zeros. It's really fun to go to every board meeting when the companies are crushing it.
Mitchell
And conversely, if you were more like.
Brian
A venture fund, you might find that a lot of your businesses that are no good, they just sort of like fall by the wayside quickly and within a couple of years they don't exist anymore. But it's that walking dead in the middle. That's where it gets really tricky because it's like the business isn't so bad, but it's not so good. You're trying your best to improve it, but it doesn't always work. And you have to be reasonable and rational about the fact that these things will exist. There's no portfolio in which it's not going to exist.
Mitchell
But those things do take time and.
Brian
They do take effort.
Mitchell
And we have to continue to spend.
Brian
The time on it because that's the.
Mitchell
Pact that we've made. And oftentimes the smartest companies, when they ask us for references, they'll say, give.
Brian
Me some references for your great companies.
Mitchell
But also give me the references for.
Brian
The companies where you've been on the board for the longest and it's not so great.
Mitchell
And that's where they're going to learn how you behave.
Brian
And if you stick with it and if you're helpful, how do people like you if you're irritable? That's an important aspect. And those types of pieces of feedback get around and that can be an issue.
Host
Those, those unscalable things are also your competitive advantage. Especially if you assume that those people only ask those questions when they have many different term sheets on the table. You end up winning that incremental great deal because of how you, how you treat the companies that aren't doing as well.
Mitchell
I always say, look, there's puts and takes to everything. As we've grown, right?
Brian
We've always been doing like the same types of deals. We have this lead edge 8 criteria that we talked about before when we.
Mitchell
Had a $52 million fund.
Brian
It was more or less the same criteria set.
Mitchell
So the companies are the same. Right. If I were to give you all.
Brian
Of our investment memos from our first fund and give you all of our investment memos from our sixth fund, they look like, identical to one another.
Mitchell
The issue ends up being, back then, we had no brand name, so there was no way for us to kind.
Brian
Of like reinforce what we were trying to do.
Mitchell
And nobody would speak on our behalf. And everything was just, we think that.
Brian
They'Ll be helpful, but we don't know.
Mitchell
But we were trying to do very small deals. So we were 5 or $10 million.
Brian
Out of a $200 million deal so we could wedge our way in. It didn't work always, but it worked oftentimes.
Mitchell
And today you fast forward and we've.
Brian
Got a much larger fund and we can do that whole $200 million deal.
Mitchell
And there's an argument to say it becomes more competitive. But the thing that we have on.
Brian
Our side now is that our flywheel is spinning faster than it ever has. And we feel really good about our reference ability and our ability to help.
Mitchell
The entrepreneurs, help the management teams, and.
Brian
If they don't believe us, go talk to our CEOs, and we're going to get the right vibes, and they're going to get the right vibes.
Host
I like to think about your reputation or your reference, like the scoreboard. You look up at the scoreboard and it's 42 to 10. And that is a scoreboard. You can say, yeah, maybe like, victim, this person, you know, upbringing, but it's still 42 to 10. So after a certain. After a certain time, the score is what it is. You mentioned maybe that's a little bit of the tougher part of your job, which is being there and providing value for companies that might not be going up into the right. What brings you the most energy? What's the most fun part of your job?
Mitchell
I'll tell you what brings me the most energy. But this might not exactly be what.
Brian
You were going for with this question. I'll tell you what brings me the most energy.
Mitchell
All right, the job is simple.
Brian
We take capital from LPs, we tell them what our strategy is going to.
Mitchell
Be, we deploy that capital, and then we try to earn returns at or.
Brian
In excess of what we told them that our returns were going to be.
Mitchell
And so what gets me the most amped up when I'm at an LP meeting or when we're having our annual.
Brian
LP meeting gathering of 3400 people.
Mitchell
And people come up to me or.
Brian
Come up to my colleagues, and they say, I invested with you because I believed in you, and you've hit my expectations. I'm going to do it again because I really appreciate everything that you're doing, and I know how hard you're working.
Mitchell
That gets me more amped up than anything. Because in this world, in this life, all that matters is, did you do.
Brian
What you say that you're going to do? If you can deliver, that makes you feel great. It makes me feel so good.
Mitchell
I would never want to know what.
Brian
It feels like to be in a position where I've told people that we're going to get a certain level of returns or work in a certain manner and then not achieve that. That would be really hard.
Mitchell
And it happens.
Brian
Sometimes you don't want. You know, obviously most people don't want it to happen, but the energy that it gives you when it is happening, you just want to keep doing it and keep working hard and keep hearing that. And that's what amps me up, and that's what keeps me going. And we have people here that are so amazing. So many of our colleagues are like, unbelievable. I watch these guys. I'm 44 years old now, so I'm not like an old man. But there's guys that have been working with us for 12, 13 years, and I'm like, oh, my God.
Mitchell
They're like, better than I ever was.
Brian
This is unbelievable. We've built a lot, and I'm delighted to have them as part of the fold. And it makes me really happy to know that all of us share a vision of delivering for our LPs. That's what gets me the most amped up.
Host
I've been thinking about this concept of how you process information, how people look at different opportunity sets. And one of the things I see among some of the top managers is that they look at everything through the people lens. So they might be doing widgets. You actually are in a pretty interesting space. But some people might be doing laundromats for 1 to 5 million. But the ones that actually have the energy are the ones that see the owner and see the people and the families that they're having. Do you see that among yourself and your partners? In that you're filtering through the people lens versus the thing or the widget lens?
Mitchell
To some degree, I think that there's a funnel that exists, and you have.
Brian
To figure out where the appropriate place within the funnel is to be making that judgment. Right.
Mitchell
So for us we have about nine.
Brian
Or so thousand calls a year with companies, so we're talking to about 9,000 companies a year. About 10% of those companies meet more than 5 of our lead agate criteria. And that's the quality bar we set for ourselves. And so call it 8 or 900 companies per year that we actually are like, okay, look, the quality bar is good enough that we maybe could even invest in this company. Anything that falls below that quality bar we probably don't want to mess with. Even if it was a really great price because it's just life's too short. You have to define what your universe looks like.
Mitchell
Pulling that down from one place to.
Brian
Another, that's not really about the people. One person that we engage with might be more exciting than another person, but.
Mitchell
But that's a very objective framework.
Brian
And the reason we need to do.
Mitchell
It that way is because it's too.
Brian
Easy to get enamored with a person. So if the first thing that we were screening for was oh, is this a great manager?
Mitchell
You'd end up with a lot of.
Brian
Stuff that meets none of your criteria and you got a problem.
Mitchell
So what ends up happening is I.
Brian
Would say that the person question ends up coming. Once you filter down to those eight or 900 companies, then it is how many of those companies are actually willing to kind of like do a deal, spend some time with you. They don't have, they do not have unrealistic expectations to start out with that ends up being two or three hundred companies per year. And at that point you're doing all of your real diligence, all of the market work, competitive dynamics, all of the modeling and the management diligence. And that's where it comes in. And it is absolutely of the utmost importance.
Mitchell
But if we were just to evaluate.
Brian
Based upon manager and have the volume of the number of companies that we speak to, it wouldn't really work very well because that shouldn't be the first of the calling mechanisms. The first of the calling mechanisms needs to be a very specific numerical framework. The second ends up having management teams be like a pretty heavy part of it.
Host
Which is why your managers, going back 14 years ago, why your managers at Bessemer would ask you for these, these binary components, which is, are they profitable, what's the revenue, what's up?
Mitchell
Totally, because it's too easy for like I got a bunch of 23 year.
Brian
Olds that sit right here outside my office every single day.
Mitchell
They're talking to companies all the time. If I said to them, CEO, did you like, they'd be like, oh, my God, I love this guy. I love that guy. I love this guy. He was amazing. She was amazing. We'd end up with 7,000 companies to diligence because there's no other framework to do it that doesn't work.
Brian
You need to focus. And so you start with that set of metrics.
Host
To your point, there's this term that I'm trying to get in the zeitgeist by repeating it, negative alpha, which I didn't create, but it's the opposite of alpha, and it's a real thing. To your point, if I put you. If I. If you were retired and I put you on a beach in Miami and everybody around you was biotech people, you would lead to more biotech investments than if I put you in another. Another beach. And being able to filter and create criteria around your surroundings, just not being in that. In that area will lead you from making mistakes. So being conscious about your processes and making sure that you don't have negative alpha, which is like, who gave the most charming presentation, is also really critical from a process standpoint, worked well for us.
Brian
I agree.
Host
What's one piece of advice that you could give yourself going back to when you started at Lead Edge a year into the firm and you were on the $52 million fund, that would have either helped you accelerate your success or helped you avoid costly mistakes.
Brian
In today's market, one of the things that you're going to see is that LPs are focusing on a metric called DPI distributions relative to paid in capital. It's a very important metric.
Mitchell
And what it really shows is how much cash has been given back to.
Brian
That LP on any given fund relative to the amount of cash that they've invested. And there's a real lack of liquidity in the market today.
Mitchell
And I think that had he told.
Brian
Me when he started that we would have a couple of companies that were in the portfolio for a long time.
Mitchell
That would have surprised me because I would have said, gosh, like, we should.
Brian
Be able to exit everything within a very particular timeframe. Now, I feel very lucky.
Mitchell
But incrementally, what would have helped is to put a framework from the very.
Brian
Beginning around how you think about exits.
Mitchell
And I think that we've done generally a very good job of this, but it hasn't been perfect. And what I mean by that is there's probably about four or five ways.
Brian
To exit a business. There's strategic exit to a big public acquirer, there's M and a exit to a another private equity firm or private equity backed company.
Mitchell
There's a secondary sale.
Brian
Could I just sell my stake in a business to somebody else? There's an ipo, initial public offering.
Mitchell
There's two more dynamics that are probably.
Brian
Less familiar to a lot of folks. One is continuation vehicles, which is now all the rage, but as very hot, but hasn't been. You know, you go back 10 years, not so much. And then the last thing is almost like a put right. How do you effectuate something where you could put your stock back to the company and have them purchase it from you or force some type of a sale.
Mitchell
And I think that a lot of.
Brian
The devil is in the details on the way in which these things are.
Mitchell
Documented and how you can ultimately force liquidity.
Brian
And that's a really, really, really important thing. And the reality of the situation is as a minority investor, you could end.
Mitchell
Up getting involved in certain companies where for whatever reason the management team doesn't.
Brian
Want to exit, the other investors don't want to exit.
Mitchell
We've had companies where there have been.
Brian
Investors in the company for like 12.
Mitchell
13 years at another private equity fund where they have no intention of exiting.
Brian
The business like in the next five years. And we're scratching our hearts saying gosh, like why are you not aligned with us on this?
Mitchell
Like this is crazy. We've been at it for like seven, you've been in it for 13. What is going on here? And there's like zero sense of urgency, Nothing. And so if you're asking for the advice, if I was a smaller fund.
Brian
Or starting out, or some of the things that create, you know, looking at some of the things that create friction.
Mitchell
I would say think very critically about.
Brian
What your exit path is going to be within any company that you invest.
Mitchell
In so that you could make sure.
Brian
That you could deliver on that promise to LPs that when you say that you underwrite to a five year timeframe, it's more or less not always going to be, but more or less that five year or six year timeframe and make sure that you know what your plan is going to be and don't end up with a situation where you could have some of that walking dead go look at a lot of the rvpi, the residual value relative to the paid in capital on a lot of funds in the venture and growth ecosystem from 15 years ago. There's still tons of private companies left in these portfolios and that creates friction because those usually aren't the best performers and they're usually not the worst performers, but they're the ones that take up the most time. So for me, that would be the advice I would give is like, don't bend on some of those discussions when you're going to invest in something, figure out what the way out is going to be, and do your absolute best to keep that as a focal point.
Host
Ryan, this has been an absolute masterclass. Thanks so much for your time and looking forward to continuing this conversation Life My pleasure.
Brian
Thank you so much for having me.
Host
That's it for today's episode of how to Invest.
Sponsor/Announcer
If this conversation gave you new insights or ideas, do me a quick favor. Share with one person in your network.
Host
Who'D find it valuable, or leave a short review wherever you listen.
Sponsor/Announcer
This helps more investors discover the show and keeps us bringing you these conversations week after week. Thank you for your continued support.
Date: December 16, 2025
Guests: Brian (Lead Edge Capital), Mitchell (Lead Edge Capital)
Host: David Weisburd
This episode explores how Brian and Mitchell built Lead Edge Capital from a $52 million fund in 2011 to a $5 billion powerhouse backed by 700 limited partners (LPs), primarily high-net-worth individuals. The discussion covers their innovative fundraising approach, LP management, investment criteria, competitive differentiation, lessons learned, and sustaining exponential growth. The conversation is rich with tactical insights for fund managers and LPs, peppered with real stories and actionable advice.
On Being Upfront With LPs
"Don't invest unless you're willing to help the portfolio companies."
—Brian (02:55)
On LP Dinners Turning into Enduring Networks
"We used to be new friends, now they're old friends... you start seeing them hang out with each other, even not under the Lead Edge umbrella."
—Mitchell (11:22)
On Pattern Recognition as a Superpower
"That pattern recognition, I think, is turbocharged as you see more and more things..."
—Brian (31:14)
On Delivering on Promises
"All that matters is, did you do what you say that you're going to do? If you can deliver, that makes you feel great."
—Brian (37:52)
On Filtering with a Nuanced Framework
"If the first thing that we were screening for was oh, is this a great manager? You'd end up with a lot of stuff that meets none of your criteria and you got a problem."
—Brian (40:19)
Advice for the Next Generation of Managers
"Think very critically about what your exit path is going to be within any company that you invest in so that you could deliver on that promise to LPs..."
—Brian (45:32)
This episode is a practical, candid “masterclass” for fund managers and sophisticated LPs, blending strategic thinking with actionable details on building and sustaining a modern investment platform.