Jack Posobiec (24:13)
They call him Mr. Steve. Mr. Steve Bannon. And they saw him go to jail last year by Joe Biden. And then Trump was shot About a week later. And now they know someone who they know. They personally know someone who was assassinated over politics and is now a martyr. And that's my kids, that's my boys. I have no idea how to explain any of this. I didn't let them watch the video, obviously. But this is the world they're growing up in right now. And all of our kids, you know, for those of us who are parents, you as well. And it will not stop until it stopped yesterday. For example, Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi, not some, you know, radical on the street in Portland. Nancy Pelosi, as close as they come to, you know, a leader of the Democrat Party, leader emeritus, maybe. She was asked about the comments of Jay Jones, who. And a lot of the write up of those text messages is. It pales in comparison to what he actually said. Not only did he say that a Republican candidate's Republican opponents children should be shot, he said that they should be shot and be forced to die in their mother's arms and that she should watch this before she and her husband were also killed. And he was texting this to a colleague who was a GOP delegate. He then called her and started berating her about this. Nancy Pelosi gets asked about this on CNN yesterday and she says, well, I still understand he's the best candidate for Attorney general. Nancy Pelosi, the closest you can come to head of the party. So excuse me if I'm not gonna sit there when they ask me, oh, Jack. Are you going to tone down the rhetoric? Oh, Jack, what about both sides? Is this both sides? Because the bullets are only coming in one direction. The rhetoric, the violence, all of this, it's only coming in one direction. I said to a reporter the other day, I said, I said, where is this violent right? Charlie Kirk was shot and killed and we responded with prayers. We responded with vigils and candles and rosaries and memorial. If there was ever a time where if this so called, quote, unquote, violent right was going to show itself, it would have been in the wake of that. And I said, show me one example, show me one example of someone on the right being violent in the wake of Charlie Kirk's murder. There isn't one. So I'd give you money. Couldn't do it. What can we do? Look, President Trump has come a long way on this. Of course, we were there yesterday. One of the concrete examples that I gave him on this is the foreign terrorist designation for antifa, the domestic terrorist designation. From a policy perspective, it does some Good. From the federal government level, however, it's not. There's no federal law against domestic terrorism, believe it or not. There are some state laws, but there's no actual federal designation as this. So it doesn't unlock the powers of the national security state, the national security apparatus, the infrastructure, the that that I used to use when I was a member of the intelligence community. However, when you look at antifa's structure, when you look at their links to Europe, which is where ANTIFA comes from, ANTIFA was originally formed in Germany, then spread to Spain, of course, Italy, France, the uk they maintain very strong cells all across Europe. And by the way, for them, for the people who say that, oh, they don't have addresses and they have safe houses, you know, I'm more than happy to provide you to them. And in fact, we have yesterday and today, you know, that roundtable that you saw is sort of becoming a sort of a quasi working group, I suppose you could say, and foreign terrorists as well as, by the way, training and links to Middle Eastern groups. And no, I don't just mean Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad and things like that, but other groups as well in Syria allows the entire national security infrastructure to be turned against these groups. It allows Secretary Besant to use the powers of the Treasury Department to go after their money, to go after the financiers, and it allows the Department of Justice to roll up any, by the way, not just anyone who is funding it, but even involved, allows them to freeze assets of anyone who is, who is involved with funding them. This is huge. So that's number one. Number two, obviously on a direct level, the joint terrorism task forces that exist throughout the country, they've been activated. Look, when it comes to a place like Portland or Chicago that are clearly in open defiance of the federal government, I've argued this on the podcast and I certainly mentioned it to the White House yesterday. Call in the National Guard, they'll call it invoking the Insurrection Act. And certainly that is what needs to be done when the governor refuses to. But when you have these groups that are clearly operating to obstruct and to kill members of the federal government who are enforcing immigration and customs laws, which is the remit of the federal government. This is the acronym ice. This is what it literally stands for. There is no state right here that's being abridged. It is very clear. This is, this is the purview of the federal government. It's a. It's an obvious supremacy clause issue. And so a limited invocation of the insurrection act to bring the National Guard in would absolutely be warranted in these instances. And for any of the groups that are involved in organizing this, then you could absolutely. You could use the Joint Terrorism Task Force to go after them. Third, and this is actually, it's a good D.C. you know, sort of trivia thing. So people know the RICO act, right, the racketeering Act. So the RICO act. And people say, why don't use RICO against antifa. And interestingly enough, there's something I didn't even know until recently, that because RICO was famously enacted against the Mafia, RICO requires a list of certain predicate crimes in order to be invoked. Well, as it turns out, because those predicated predicate crimes were designed for Mafia Mafioso mob organizations. Giuliani, of course, uses Smash the Five Families in New York. Rioting is not one of those predicate crimes currently. So this is an area where a legislative fix. And I believe Senator Cruz actually has a bill in, in the Senate about this, and there's some other folks in the House that have talked about it as well. This could be a very quick update that's done to the RICO act just to add rioting as one of the predicate crimes, to be able to start an entire racketeering investigation into the organization and everything they touch and. Sure. And by the way, if the media tells us that they don't exist and they shouldn't have any problem with this, would they?