Episode Overview
Date: February 16, 2026
Host: Jack Posobiec
Guests: Terry Schilling (American Principles Project), Kevin Posobic (field correspondent), Lyndon Blake (Daily Wire)
Main Theme:
Jack Posobiec analyzes a series of major breaking stories: the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) subpoenas of social media platforms, the high-stakes Warner Brothers acquisition negotiations, and the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie—a case where DNA and investigative mishaps may finally lead to a resolution.
Key Discussion Points
1. DHS Subpoenas Social Media Companies
[03:00 – 10:10]
- DHS Action:
The Department of Homeland Security issued hundreds of subpoenas to social media companies, including Google, Meta, Discord, and Reddit, specifically targeting accounts suspected of organizing anti-ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) actions and threats against federal agents. - Jack’s Perspective:
Jack celebrates the subpoenas as overdue action:“We need to disrupt these networks. We need to shut down the networks of anarchists operating in this country. We need to hit them where it hurts, take out their communications. That's what this is about.” (08:02)
- Civil Liberties Debate:
He counters critics' civil liberties concerns by referencing the prosecution of right-wing meme creator Doug Mackey, emphasizing a double standard:"You guys threw a guy in jail or you tried to throw a guy in jail until his conviction was thrown out in appeals court for posting a meme. And now you're… crying because the actual criminals are about to face justice. I love it." (09:30)
- Strategic Weakness:
Social media is described as the “C2” (command and control) system for criminal networks, vulnerable to lawful disruption.
2. The Warner Brothers Acquisition War: Paramount vs. Netflix
[10:30 – 18:54]
- Background:
Netflix had an agreement to acquire Warner Brothers, but Paramount entered with a more lucrative, direct-to-shareholders offer. - Contentious Issues:
Jack and guest Terry Schilling argue Netflix’s “woke” and trans-inclusive content, especially in children’s programming, has damaged its brand and driven Warner Brothers’ reconsideration. - Jack’s Take:
“The trans agenda that Netflix has played a huge role in is a major part of this.” (11:46)
- Terry Schilling’s Analysis:
Parental and public pressure play a key role:“Millions of parents... are very concerned about Y7 shows with transgender and drag themes and LGBTQ characters... The pressure that your viewers and War Room and everyone else in the conservative [movement] is putting on—Netflix is a damaged brand.” (12:41) “If Paramount takes the [deal]...we can sleep well at night knowing that...Bugs Bunny is not going to come out of the closet as a transgender demi boy or something.” (15:12)
- Cultural Backlash:
They view the acquisition drama as emblematic of a wider backlash against “wokeness” and political agendas in U.S. corporate media, referencing Disney, HBO, and the Obamas’ involvement with Netflix. - Key Quote:
“The whole point and purpose of Wokeness is to antagonize… to subvert the prevailing culture. ...People just want to be entertained.” – Terry Schilling (17:26)
3. The Nancy Guthrie Case: DNA, Law Enforcement Coordination, and Community Tension
[21:58 – 47:56]
■ Timeline and Field Reporting
[21:58 – 25:54]
- Incident Recap:
Live reporting by Kevin Posobic outside Nancy Guthrie’s home in Pima County, Arizona, details a Friday night SWAT operation, detainment of three people (later released), and involvement of bomb squads and law enforcement vehicles. - Evidence Gathering:
Law enforcement is collaborating with local Walmarts, searching transaction histories related to clothing and a backpack tied to the suspect. New DNA results confirm the suspect is male, based on “touch DNA” found inside a glove matching surveillance images.
■ Advanced DNA Forensics
[25:54 – 32:39]
- Genetic Genealogy:
Rapid use of genetic genealogy (as in the Bryan Kohberger case) allows investigators to match DNA within 24–48 hours – a process that once took months. - Databases Used:
The sample is compared both against CODIS (criminal DNA database) and genealogical services like 23andMe and Ancestry.com. - Lab Dispute:
A local Florida lab (private) and the FBI’s Quantico lab (federal) are processing evidence in parallel. This dual approach creates friction and delays. - Lyndon Blake’s Explanation:
“If this person has any type of criminal record in [CODIS], they'll be able to match whoever’s DNA is on this glove... If there's not anything in CODIS, that’s what Kevin was talking about—then they’ll go down the genealogy trail, as in the Kohberger case.” (29:31)
■ Inside the Investigation: Cooperation and Roadblocks
[38:44 – 47:17]
- Inexperienced Local Force:
Many detectives in Pima County have only a few years' experience. This increases the need for stronger federal-local cooperation. - Lack of Coordination:
The FBI is frustrated with the Pima Sheriff’s Office, especially over delayed lab processing and limits on federal intervention.“The FBI... are very confused on why Pima county... had the cold shoulder when they first got into town... and why there’s so much lack of cooperation at the command level.” – Lyndon Blake (41:15)
- New Local Resolutions:
Pima County’s Board of Supervisors is set to introduce policies that restrict federal agents—ICE, Border Patrol, FBI, HSI—from accessing detainees or crime scenes without search warrants.“It could actually hinder the relationship... between working a murder investigation between the federal level and the sheriff’s level.” – Jack (45:08)
- Public and National Focus:
With national attention on the Guthrie case, these jurisdictional disputes are seen as detrimental to public safety and community trust.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- On DHS Subpoenas:
“You can't use social media to plan crimes. It's really that simple.” – Jack Posobiec (08:30)
- On Corporate Wokeness:
“Netflix is primarily an activist company... People just want to be entertained, they want to laugh. They want to let their kids learn about physics through Looney Tunes.” – Terry Schilling (15:33)
- On DNA Technology Advances:
“If you look back at the OJ Simpson case, that was 30 years ago... this took about 24 to 48 hours. They utilized genetic genealogy.” – Kevin Posobic (25:54)
- On Law Enforcement Tensions:
“The FBI... just want to help. But... it’s not on the ground... It’s more the command level. The people on the ground are trying to get this solved, but they just keep running into these roadblocks because there’s not this synergy at the top.” – Lyndon Blake (41:15)
- On Local-Federal Policy Clash:
“They’re not only not using the word sanctuary city, of course, that would be too harsh… this is quite the timing. It’s quite interesting timing that we’re seeing this unfold.” – Kevin Posobic (45:08)
Important Timestamps
- 00:30: Coverage of US Navy ship collision, US strikes on ISIS
- 02:27: Introduction to the Nancy Guthrie case and Warner Brothers deal
- 03:00: DHS issues subpoenas to social media platforms
- 11:46: Breakdown of the Warner Brothers–Paramount–Netflix saga
- 12:41: Terry Schilling on the damage to Netflix’s brand
- 21:58: Kevin Posobic live from the Guthrie crime scene in Arizona
- 25:54: Details on DNA forensics and investigative process
- 29:31: FBI lab vs. private Florida lab in DNA processing
- 38:44: Kevin reports on inexperience in local law enforcement
- 41:15: Lyndon Blake on the lack of command-level cooperation
- 45:08: Possible impact of new Pima County resolutions restricting federal law enforcement
Summary/Tone
Jack Posobiec maintains a brisk, sardonic, and combative tone, frequently voicing suspicion of progressive institutions, championing anti-woke social movements, and decrying bureaucratic inefficiency. The episode is highly topical, loaded with insider language and pointed humor.
For Further Information
- Terry Schilling: @Schilling1776
- Lyndon Blake: “Finding Nancy Guthrie” (Daily Wire, Spotify, Apple)
- Kevin Posobic: @KevinPosobic, Real America’s Voice
For those who haven’t listened:
This episode drives home the intersections of culture, technology, and law enforcement—moving from social media’s newfound legal accountability, through frontline battles over corporate cultural influence, and into the weeds of real-world policing, technology, and jurisdictional rivalry in a high-stakes missing persons case.
