Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec
Episode: ICE Officer Suffered Internal Bleeding When The Car Hit, Partner Now Under DOJ Investigation
Date: January 14, 2026
Episode Overview
This episode of Human Events Daily, hosted by Jack Posobiec, dives into the fallout from a violent altercation in Minneapolis involving an ICE officer and discusses the subsequent federal investigation into anti-ICE agitators. The show also covers the broader implications for law enforcement, the rule of law, and American immigration policy. The episode wraps up with expert commentary on breaking developments at the Supreme Court concerning trans athletes in women's sports, connecting the issues to America First priorities and the state of political discourse in 2026.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. The Minneapolis Incident: Facts and Fallout
[05:00 – 07:20]
-
Incident Recap:
- ICE Officer Jonathan Ross suffered serious internal injuries after being rammed by a car driven by "a deranged anti-ICE agitator" in Minneapolis, which Posobiec emphasizes as a shift in narrative from the mainstream media’s original reporting.
- Ross is an Iraq War veteran and longtime DHS officer, recently raising nearly $1 million through crowdfunding due to extensive medical bills.
-
Narrative War:
- The mainstream media originally framed the story as "ICE agent murders protester," but Posobiec and his guests insist the real story is "anti-ICE agitator attempted to kill an ICE officer."
- Quote [06:22, Jack Posobiec]:
"Stop using the left’s frame... You must state the truth when you speak. Don’t ever give up the fact of what happened that predicated all of these issues."
-
Statistical Context:
- According to the ICE director’s recent comments, car ramming attacks on ICE and Border Patrol agents are up "a thousand fold" (not independently verified on the show).
2. Partner Under DOJ Investigation
[10:00 – 19:00]
-
DOJ Probe:
- Becca Good, partner of Renee Goode (the driver), is now under federal criminal investigation for her actions during and before the attack. Julie Kelly has allegedly found no record of a legal marriage, only a name change.
- Posobiec details Becca Good’s encouraging of her partner's actions as documented on video and calls this part of a wider pattern of organized, conspiratorial anti-ICE activism.
-
Breakdown of Potential Crimes:
- Will Chamberlain, legal analyst [13:23 – 15:20], lists at least four felonies evident from video evidence:
- Conspiracy to obstruct law enforcement
- Actual obstruction of law enforcement by intimidation/threats
- Urging a partner to flee arrest (felony)
- Urging aggravated assault on federal officer (most serious)
- Quote [15:23, Will Chamberlain]:
"In one video, you’ve got evidence for four distinct federal crimes... She is one of the primary reasons that this entire thing happened."
- Will Chamberlain, legal analyst [13:23 – 15:20], lists at least four felonies evident from video evidence:
-
On "Optics" vs Law:
- Posobiec forcefully rejects concerns about the 'optics' of prosecuting anti-ICE activists, insisting "the only crimes committed were by Goode, her partner, and those who aided and abetted."
- Quote [17:01, Jack Posobiec]:
"There’s no optics. The DOJ didn’t choose to commit these actions. They chose to commit these actions."
3. Legal Intricacies: The Felony Murder Rule
[20:00 – 24:45]
-
Federal vs State Law:
- Minnesota's state felony murder rule was "defanged" in 2023 by Governor Tim Walz, but the federal rule still applies since this involved a federal officer.
-
Applicability:
- Debate on whether fleeing lawful arrest triggers the felony murder rule under federal law; legal AI tool ("Grok") suggests it may not unless in "custody," but still leaves open potential for aggravated assault and conspiracy charges.
- Cultural Reflection:
- Chamberlain dismisses attempts to draw moral equivalence between any policing mistakes and felonious obstruction/assault by activists.
4. "LARPing" and the Disconnect from Real Consequences
[29:45 – 36:30]
-
LARPing Defined:
- Libby Emmons (editor, op-ed author) explains activists were "live action role playing" (LARPing) and didn’t anticipate real-world consequences.
- Quote [30:02, Libby Emmons]:
"They didn’t think law enforcement was actually out there being law enforcement... They thought law enforcement was out there to larp around with these activists."
-
Unexpected Tragedy and Responsibility:
- Activists underestimated ICE as a law enforcement agency and were, according to Emmons, perhaps misled by the idea that whiteness would shield them from consequences—a narrative Emmons harshly rebuts.
-
Consequences and Parenting:
- Both Posobiec and Emmons urge that people should comply with police, challenge actions in court, and not in the street—offering basic guidance for protest conduct.
5. Broader National Themes: Enforcement, Immigration, and Political Mandate
[27:30 – 29:30]
-
Call for Mass Deportations/Enforcement:
- Posobiec asserts mass deportations were a key campaign promise, and Americans "voted for this."
- Quote [29:30, Jack Posobiec]:
"We’re not pumping the brakes, we’re not pausing... The only way out is through. We have the initiative. We’re going to press the initiative."
-
Legislative Challenge:
- Taunts the left to introduce legislation to abolish ICE, doubting its popular support.
6. Supreme Court Update: Trans Athletes in Women's Sports
[38:00 – 47:35]
-
Supreme Court Case:
- Panel (Erica Donalds, Paula Scanlon, Posobiec) discusses a Supreme Court case on whether trans athletes can participate in women’s sports.
- Quote [39:31, Paula Scanlon]:
"This is so silly to me, the fact that we have Supreme Court justices sitting there listening to arguments on is a man a man? Is a woman a woman?"
-
Locker Room Experience & Safety:
- Scanlon relays her discomfort sharing a locker room with a biological male, highlighting how teammates were told to "seek psychological services" rather than object.
-
Title IX & Women’s Rights:
- Donalds reiterates that allowing males in women’s sports undermines the original intent of Title IX and women's opportunities in athletics and life.
-
Common Sense & Pushback on "Woke" Narrative:
- Panel critiques the left’s focus on individual feelings over fairness and safety, recounting polling data suggesting widespread discomfort with current trans-inclusion policies.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- [06:22] Jack Posobiec:
“Stop using the left’s frame...You must state the truth when you speak.” - [13:23] Will Chamberlain:
“I don’t begrudge people for having Honda Pilots. I begrudge them driving it at ICE officers.” - [15:23] Will Chamberlain:
“In one video... evidence for four distinct federal crimes.” - [17:01] Jack Posobiec:
“There’s no optics. The DOJ didn’t choose to commit these actions. They chose to commit these actions.” - [30:02] Libby Emmons:
“They didn’t think law enforcement was actually out there being law enforcement. They thought law enforcement was out there to larp around with these activists.” - [32:24] Libby Emmons:
“They thought... they could go out there, shoot some TikToks...and still get home in time for the school bus.” - [39:31] Paula Scanlon:
“This is so silly to me, the fact that we have Supreme Court justices sitting there listening to arguments on is a man a man? Is a woman a woman?” - [41:50] Paula Scanlon:
“This guy was undressing in front of us, fully intact male, not once or twice, but 18 times per week. And we were told if we objected...we were the problem.” - [43:48] Erica Donalds:
“Women fought so hard for Title IX to ensure opportunities for our young women... Taking that away from them is absolutely not the intention of the law.”
Timestamps for Key Segments
- 05:00 — Minneapolis ICE officer story introduction
- 07:20 — "America First" meaning & mass deportations policy
- 10:00 — DOJ investigation into Becca Good, anti-ICE groups
- 13:00 — Legal analysis of crimes, Will Chamberlain
- 19:00 — Law enforcement, optics, and prosecutorial priorities
- 20:00 — Felony murder rule debate
- 29:45 — Libby Emmons on "LARPing" and activist motivations
- 32:24 — Social media/cultural influences and white privilege assumptions
- 38:00 — Panel on Supreme Court case: trans athletes in women’s sports
- 41:50 — Locker room safety and Title IX origins
Summary & Takeaways
This episode delivers a combative and unapologetically right-leaning account of the Minneapolis car-ramming incident, doubling down on law enforcement’s side while urging a crackdown on anti-ICE organizers and agitators. The discussion extends to critiques of progressive activism, "LARPing," and the perceived dominance of identity politics. Legal complexities, such as the felony murder rule and prosecutorial priorities, are examined in depth. The latter part of the episode pivots to the national stage, connecting immigration enforcement to broader “America First” policies and the Supreme Court’s handling of hot-button issues like trans participation in women’s sports. The overall tone is defiant, urgent, and grounded in a law-and-order ethos, with frequent calls to double down on enforcement and statutory clarity.
