← Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec
Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec
Live From CPAC: When Men Vote - Republicans Win and the Latest Poll on Veteran Support For the Iran Conflict
00:50:47
Loading summary
Transcript161 lines
- [00:02]
A
Hey guys, it's Jack. I wanted to let you know that we're starting a new push for subscriptions here on Human Events Daily. So make sure that when you're listening to this podcast, you hit subscribe, you download it, and you share it with five of your friends. Make sure they're all going and downloading as well, because we need to get the signal out as much as possible. Look, we've done so much over the past couple of years since this show started, and we're only going to do so much more. Let's get it. This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
- [00:45]
B
A commentator, international social media sensation and former Navy intelligence veteran.
- [00:51]
A
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobic.
- [00:54]
C
Christ is King families, TSA workers who are suffering. You have people across the country who are missing flights for funerals and for work commitments because of Democrat politicians on Capitol Hill. Mary in the back.
- [01:07]
B
Thanks, girl.
- [01:08]
C
Glad to see you. Have a seat now. I do.
- [01:10]
B
Thank you. Is the White House satisfied with Republican
- [01:13]
C
leadership's efforts on the Save America Act? I think the president has made it very clear he wants everyone on Capitol Hill to move as quickly as possible to get the Save America act passed, and he wants to see that legislation on his desk as soon as Republicans and Democrats can move to pass it.
- [01:30]
B
But are there any lawmakers in Congress that the president is frustrated with on this matter and feels could be doing a better job?
- [01:37]
A
Ms.
- [01:37]
C
I think the president wants to see everybody on Capitol Hill move faster all the time, that he wants everyone in this town to work at Trump's speed like we do here at the White House. But Karen, Caroline, two questions on Lebanon, if I can.
- [01:50]
B
Is the US Providing support at this
- [01:53]
C
point for Israel's ongoing offensive in Lebanon? And is the president concerned that right
- [01:58]
B
now there are more than a million people who've been displaced and potentially could
- [02:02]
C
be for a significant amount of time? Ms. That's not something I'm in a position to comment on for the first question to the second question, of course that's something that would concern the president. I think that's why he's, again, quickly moving to eliminate the threat of the Iranian regime in the Middle east, including weakening their proxies like Hezbollah, who have terrorized Lebanon for far too long. And I know that the president wants to see this again move as quickly as possible as we can over the course of the next couple of weeks here.
- [02:30]
B
Thank you, Caroline.
- [02:30]
C
The question about the Strait of Corona,
- [02:33]
B
if these negotiations are not successful, is
- [02:36]
A
the only option to open to reopen
- [02:38]
B
the strait, boots on the ground, given that all of our allies have essentially
- [02:42]
A
said that they are unable or unwilling to look.
- [02:45]
C
That's a hypothetical question. It's a hypothetical question. It's also a decision that would have to be made by the commander in chief and I'm not going to get ahead of him.
- [02:54]
B
And in addition to that, when it comes to the vice president, J.D.
- [02:56]
A
vance, what has changed that has made him more of an active participant in
- [03:00]
C
these negotiations with Iran? I don't think anything has changed. The Vice President has always been a key member, the President's right hand man and a key member of the President's national security team. He's been part of these discussions throughout this entire course of the administration. With respect again, to the 12 day war that the President and his national security team negotiated a solution to, with respect to the cease fire between Israel and Gaza and the release of the hostages, which there was a lot of criticism that couldn't get done and it did. The vice President has been by the President's side every step of the way and any reporting otherwise is just completely false. I see him in the room again. The President seeks his counsel on all matters, both foreign and domestic.
- [03:43]
B
Can you just tell us who exactly, who exactly the US Is negotiating with
- [03:47]
A
in Iran and why the US and this administration trust that person?
- [03:50]
C
Again, as I said to Gabe's question earlier, we're not going to get into the details of these negotiations and conversations that continue to take place. As of course, you can imagine, they are very sensitive diplomatic discussions. And I would reiterate, I do recall giving all of you the same answer when we were negotiating the ceasefire between Israel and Gaza. Gave you the same, same answer throughout the 12 day war between Iran and Israel. Gave you the same answer with respect to many of the other global conflicts that this administration has negotiated solutions to. President Trump is going to give his diplomats the freedom that they need to have these sensitive diplomatic discussions without negotiating and litigating them through the news media.
- [04:30]
A
Fran, just to follow up though, because you said that some of the information that's been out there about the 15 point plan is inaccurate. Can you say what is accurate with respect to ballistic missions, missiles, the nuclear ambitions in the Strait of Hormuz, which are things that the President has laid out that he wants to see a couple times in the past.
- [04:49]
C
If you've heard it from the President of the United States, obviously it's true. As well as the objectives of Operation Epic Fury, We've said repeatedly, I've said them from this podium, the Pentagon has reiterated them. That's why we've taken military action to achieve them. So of course, those are goals that we want to see. But this full 15 point plan that's been floating around in many of your outlets, there's a lot of misinformation to that as well. And again, I would caution you from taking things from anonymous sources rather than verifying them directly with the White House.
- [05:18]
A
Christian thanks, Caroline. Two on Iran. First, would the president consider loosening asylum restrictions for Iranians trying to flee the country right now?
- [05:28]
C
Ms. Again, that's a question for the president. I won't get ahead of him on that. I haven't talked to him about that.
- [05:33]
A
And then secondly, you mentioned at the top that Iran would be hit harder than they have been to this point if they don't recognize the fact that they're losing this war. Could those strikes happen before this five day negotiating window closes if the president doesn't think they're negotiating in good faith?
- [05:50]
C
You're asking me to tell you if the commander in chief would authorize very strong strikes against the Iranian regime. That's not something I would ever reveal from this podium, true or not.
- [06:00]
A
Phil, thank you. Caroline, I was wondering if you would respond to some of this criticism of the administration from past allies like Joe Kent who have said that the President's red line shifted from Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon to Iran cannot pursue nuclear enrichment. What is the administration's response to that criticism? Ms.
- [06:23]
C
I think the president and I have both strongly responded to the criticism by Mr. Kent, who unfortunately resigned in disgrace and accused the president of basically being controlled by foreign countries and foreign manipulation, which is a ridiculous and laughable assertion. So his accusations have zero credibility as far as this White House is concerned.
- [06:43]
A
The question of the red line shifting from no nuclear weapon to no nuclear enrichment, is there any substance to that argument?
- [06:52]
D
Ms.
- [06:52]
C
I think the President has been quite clear in what he wants to see from the Iranian regime, which is why he chose to launch Operation Epic Fury in the first place. Reagan, I have a question for you on the SAVE act, and I'd like to follow up on the DHS shutdown.
- [07:05]
B
Sure.
- [07:06]
C
First, Senator MICHAEL the Save America Act. Save America act. The President corrected me yesterday. That was my fault.
- [07:12]
A
Senator Mike Lee said it's essentially impossible to pass the Save America act through reconciliation. What's your reaction to that? Is the President worried that that Strategy might fail?
- [07:22]
C
Ms. I think he's willing to try all strategies. I spoke with him about this yesterday and he said if we can make it work through reconciliation. Let's absolutely do that. These, again, are common sense policies that are backed by the vast majority of voters across this country. The only people in this country who don't support them are politicians on Capitol Hill. And you all should ask them why they don't want voter id, why they don't want proof of citizenship to vote in our nation's elections. Again, these are these are common sense proposals that are wildly popular and the president is willing to use any means necessary to get this legislation passed and onto his desk. And then on the DHS shutdown, do
- [07:58]
A
you expect deportations to decrease while ICE is in the airports and what are the trade offs of having ICE in the airports right now?
- [08:05]
C
Well, to address this obviously short term problem and the chaos that has been sowed by these Democrats on Capitol Hill to address the lines and to get Americans traveling and get them to where they need to be. So the president thinks this was a creative solution. Again, that was criticized, but we have seen wait times decrease, not as much as we'd like. Hopefully they will continue to, but at major airports over the course of the last few days, as ICE has been facilitating with travelers in these airports. Caroline.
- [08:34]
A
Caroline, thank you, Caroline. On March 6, the President said in an interview with Reuters that the US should have a role in choosing Iran's next leadership now that we're almost four
- [08:44]
E
weeks into the operation.
- [08:45]
A
As that speed the President's assessment of where things should go?
- [08:48]
C
Ms. As I've said repeatedly, I think the President obviously believes the United States wants to have someone in leadership position in the Iranian regime that will be much more favorable, that will be willing to work with the United States that will no longer chant Death to America. These would obviously be good common sense things for the United States and for our allies. And I think that's what the President meant when he spoke with Reuters that day. Go ahead.
- [09:13]
A
The President yesterday said that achieved regime
- [09:17]
D
change in Iran because the regime has
- [09:21]
A
changed in terms of Ms.
- [09:23]
C
I mean, has it not the leadership, their entire leadership has been killed and nobody has really seen or legitimately heard from this alleged new leader. So wouldn't you say there's been a change in the regime?
- [09:34]
A
Mr. There's been a change in leadership. I mean, there's been a change in
- [09:37]
C
the regime leadership, which is what the president said. So thank you for confirming he is right.
- [09:41]
A
I mean, do you feel as though you've achieved leadership level, the personnel in place right now in Iran that you're satisfied with? I mean, have you I think it's
- [09:53]
C
too soon to say in terms of
- [09:54]
A
highly enriched uranium in Iran right now, is your expectation I mean, the stated desire of the president has been to prevent nuclear weapons. Is your expectation that the endgame here is that eventually Americans will be in possession of that uranium or you'll somehow have some direct control over the highly enriched uranium that could be used to develop?
- [10:15]
C
Ms. Again, this is a point of conversation that continues. I think you know the means in which the United States would have to take in order to achieve that goal, and that's a decision for the president to make. Brian, good to see you.
- [10:29]
A
Brian Glenn, good to see you as well.
- [10:31]
D
Does the White House have a comment
- [10:33]
A
on a letter that was sent from
- [10:35]
D
Congressman Raskin to the doj alleging that
- [10:39]
A
the DOJ recklessly released damning information in regards to President Trump's documents? Ms.
- [10:48]
C
Yes, I saw that letter from Congressman Raskin this morning, who I would add has zero credibility, and this letter was clearly a cheap political stunt. What the congressman did here, Brian, and for everyone in the room who's hopefully not reporting on this as fact, is that he took untrue and salacious claims in a memo that was produced by Jack Smith, who has been completely discredited for his lawfare and his witch hunts against this president. And that information was unverified. It never even made it into the indictment because it was so unverified. And what happened to that indictment anyway? It was thrown out. And Jack Smith has been proven again to be a prosecutor on a witch hunt against President Trump. He tried to throw him in jail ahead of the 2024 election. The Biden Department of Justice was fully on board with this lawfare campaign. And in fact, this story that was concocted by Congressman Raskin was so ridiculous, I understand his communications team reached out to some outlets in this room who responsibly said, we're not going to write this because this is just too much. However, of course, msnow did write that story this morning because they continue to be left wing propaganda for the Democrat Party. But I think Jack Smith has been proven to be a liar and a fraud, and this is, again, a cheap political stunt from a Democrat on Capitol Hill who I think wants to get himself on cable television. Thank you all very much.
- [12:08]
A
Thank you. So I went to this magic show with Tanya Tay a couple of weeks ago and a really interesting thing happened. So the magician was able to point at people in the audience and and all of a sudden, unbeknownst to them, was able to recite for them specific information about where they Lived about their family, in some cases about their finances, where they had their money, what bank they used, their email address, in other cases their passwords, even their Social Security numbers. Now, of course, he did this in the context of a trick. It was in the context of, you know, a magic trick. It was part of the show, wasn't used for nefarious purposes. But how was he able to do that? How was he able to compile these dossiers on the audience, you ask? Well, I'll tell you how. It's because your information is out there on data broker websites and people search websites. It is out there. He was able to do this as people were coming in, as they were buying tickets. His team was able to look that up with ease. And this was a huge wake up call to a ton of people in the audience. But you know what? When he went to look up my name, when he looked up, went to look up my wife's name, they couldn't find a thing. So ask yourself, what defenses are there against this? Well, as I know and the human defense audience knows, the defense is Patriot Protect. Because Patriot Protect is the tool that will remove you from the system. Patriot Protect deletes your personal information from Google and over 240 data broker and people search sites, the exact places that all of these sites and scammers and magicians apparently pull from. So once removed, the search and destroy protocol keeps monitoring and wiping new exposures automatically. So do not sit there and let these scammers and con artists use this system to exploit and steal from you and your family. Use Patriot Protect and take your data back, Take control of your personal information and reduce your exposure. Use promo code POSO for 15% off. All Patriot Protect plans go to patriot-protect.com poso and use promo code POSO for 15% OFF. That's patriot-protect.com poso. All right, guys, we are here for the opening of cpac. We are in Dallas, Texas, technically, Grapevine, Texas. Incredible. Patriot, cpac. And what more patriotic place could you find than Dallas, Texas? And we're so, so incredibly honored and blessed that we've got a surprise interview for you guys with Matt and Mercedes Schlapp. What's up, guys?
- [14:58]
E
Great to be with you, Jack.
- [14:59]
F
Yes, great to be with you and thanks for being here.
- [15:01]
A
I wouldn't miss it. I wouldn't miss it. Tell me. So obviously we're building the, still, still building the big RAB stage. So we're kind of on our, you know, day one sort of stage set up here. So you'll have to come back tomorrow when we have the big 90 foot stage that Rob St. Sake is putting in massive investment as well as CPAC live. You know, we're going to be doing that stage as well downstairs. Talk to us about how having CPAC right here in the heart of patriotic America is so key to 2026.
- [15:28]
F
Well, I got to tell you, we have to go where the people are. And Texas is a critical state to win as we're going into the midterm elections. There's no question, Jack, that our focus has to be the midterms. Okay? The Democrats think that they, they're going to win this. They are very cocky about this. And Republicans, we got to get united. We stand together. Forget about all the talking heads that are being, you know, trying to kill each other off. That's not our goal. Our goal is unity. Our goal is to address actions over words. That's our theme. And bringing all these Americans together, not just from Texas, I mean, people are coming from across the globe to basically say, we're united in this conservative movement. We have to save Western civilization. We've got to save America.
- [16:10]
A
Absolutely. And you just come back from cpac, Hungary, I think it's like yesterday.
- [16:15]
E
It feels like yesterday. Yeah.
- [16:16]
A
And we're going to win in Hungary. Or Bond. He's got a tight election. I know, but. I know, and I was going to say that CPAC was the difference. I would say see in Poland last year and now the victor of that race, President Novarodsky from Poland, will be giving a keynote speech here this weekend.
- [16:34]
E
Thanks for saying his name correctly. I don't know how you know how to say his name, but I have
- [16:38]
A
a little bit of experience.
- [16:40]
D
Cool.
- [16:41]
E
The look, I. The one thing I'd say about all the people that are squabbling with each other, who are leaders in media and everything else, is I actually don't care if people like each other or not or if they have differences of opinion on policy. CPAC's always accepted the differences. People talk about the differences. I don't censor or edit what people say. Just remember in the midst of all that, there's a bigger picture. Civilization almost cracked and went away. Donald Trump was being sued in courtroom after courtroom. They were taking his money. They wanted to put him in prison. They wanted to prevent him from being on the ballot. And what they weren't able to do with Donald Trump, they could do with Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil. And, you know, we didn't have very many leaders. And then things started to Change. And Javier Milei won. And we have a great president of Paraguay, President Pena. And we have some. We're on the cusp of some big victories. On top of the Polish victory, we had a victory in the Czech Republic. We're going to see more victories in Europe. Civilization is making a comeback. These societies are making a comeback. CPAC is a big part of that. But right now, just like the last election, we got some work to do here in America.
- [17:46]
A
I think it's exactly right. And, you know, you mentioned Texas and you mentioned the midterms and obviously the heated primary corn in Paxton. Look, I'm a Paxton guy, but even beyond that is the idea that of James Tallarico. And I was in a debate the other day with some, some liberals, and they came up and they were trying to troll us out, you know, in front of our event at asu. And we got out there and I said, well, I walked right out to him and they said, well, you guys worried about James Talarico? And I said, are you kidding me? This is who you're putting up? But at the same time, they're putting so much of their resources, they're putting their machine behind them. They're putting their shoulder to the wheel. And so even after, you know, by the way, and I'm just going to say it, I think that Jasmine Crockett did have the election stolen from her. It's very clear. They put their thumb on the scale to make sure that Talarico wanted. Jasmine was my girl. I wanted her to be in there just for the content, you know, way too much, too much fun.
- [18:41]
F
You got to be. I mean, he, he has his own. He's his own character.
- [18:44]
A
Right?
- [18:45]
F
I mean, he's got a vegan running campaign. Explain how that's going to work.
- [18:49]
A
I didn't know this.
- [18:51]
F
I didn't know running campaign here in Texas, which is like the largest, you know, meat producing.
- [18:57]
A
I didn't know there were vegans in Texas.
- [18:59]
E
Is that even.
- [19:00]
A
Is veganism even legal here?
- [19:01]
F
It shouldn't be, let me tell you. But, you know, he is so out of. He plays, tries to play himself as like this Baptist minister. He's going to try to connect with these evangelical Christians. And he's a fake. And we have to call him out for what he is, what he stands for, does not align in any way with what I would say, say are the biblical teachings. And he's an extreme and extremist. And this is the thing, they try to come across these Democrats as being moderates, are trying to Pretend like they,
- [19:28]
A
you know, wait, just, just to double check. So, so you wouldn't agree with him when he says that Jesus was non binary.
- [19:35]
F
Right, Right.
- [19:35]
A
So as we hear on the feast of denunciation. So when the angel came to Mary, she didn't say, you're going to have a son. She going to. She didn't say. Or the angel didn't say, you're going to have a Zimzer.
- [19:46]
D
Exactly.
- [19:47]
E
And he also said, he also said that the Virgin Mary was pro choice. Be it done unto me according to thy word. So that meant that she actually considered that he said, not me. I think it's sacrilegious to even say that she would somehow abort the son of God. Like, the guy's insane. Look, the only, our best thing going for us is that they're lying about being moderate. They're still as crazy as they ever were. And, but we still have to execute. And I think we're entirely too cavalier that just because Trump was able to come back that we're going to get it done. I think we can get it done, but it's going to be the work of grassroots activists that get it done.
- [20:31]
A
It's going to be great. And it's the work of you guys. And so you heading out to break. But tell people if they haven't come yet, where can they go to either get involved if they're in Texas, get tickets if there's any available yet. Because I know they're to going go. They're going like crazy.
- [20:42]
E
But I see the line down there.
- [20:43]
A
I saw the line. I actually heard a rumor that you guys might be adding seats because the demand is so high.
- [20:50]
F
Demand is so high. I think that, you know, the Patriots, they want direction. They want to know what is our message? What do we need to say? How are we going to make sure that we're able to say, look, we trust in Trump, we know he's doing the right thing. We need to bring this message to the American people. We need to ensure that we keep a Republican majority in the Senate, in the House, or you know what this is going to lead to. We've been down that road. It will be impeachment after impeachment. This is about President Trump's legacy and this is about saving America. And if you can come to CPAC, please, please, please go to cpac.org get your tickets there before they sell out. It is, let me tell you, I already can feel the energy here.
- [21:26]
A
You see, it's set up day. We're here at cpac. Matt, slap. Mercedes, slap. God bless you both. Thank you so much for being here. Jack. Impromptu interviews. Look at this. And they come right over. They come right over and yeah, we'll have to downgrade the show and bring Kevin back over afterwards. Right back. Human Events daily,
- [21:49]
G
You know, they talk about influencers. These are influencers and they're friends of mine. Jack. Where's Jack? Jack got a great job.
- [22:01]
A
So I recently got back from Phoenix where I was speaking with TPOSA at their ASU chapter event. And I gotta say, Tanya Tay really set up something amazing for me because she was able, with, you know, a little help from, from my father in law, to set up our new ghost bed. So I finally got to sleep on the ghost bed. And let me tell you guys, this thing was an absolute game changer. Not only did it give me the support that I wanted throughout the night, it was comfortable, it was cool. It didn't get too hot. It was one of those sort of just right Goldilocks kind of experiences that you want from a mattress. I slept on this thing and look, I had been flying around the country going back and forth to turning point events and human events events. And then you come home to the ghost bed. And it was exactly what I needed. My back pain immediately vanished after sleeping on this thing. Prior to that, I'd been sleeping in hotel beds. And you never know what you're going to get when you get there. So when you have a ghost bed, you know you are coming home to the best bed that your money can buy. And think about it. When it comes to your health, if you're going to be spending eight hours a night on your bed, that is 30% of your day, 1/3 of your day, one third of your life is going to be spent on a mattress. That's why this spring it is time for you to upgrade your mattress. And I personally recommend and endorse Ghostbed. Ghostbed is a family owned and operated company with three generations of doing business right here in the United States of America. And yes, it is American made. Check this out. By the way, they have a new deal for our human events audience. If you get 101 nights, you, you can try a ghostbed at home. And if you don't feel the difference, and I'll tell you I felt the difference, you can send it back risk free. So right now Ghostbed is offering the human events audience their lowest prices of the spring plus an extra 10% off. How do you get involved? You go to ghostbed.com poso and use promo code poso. That's ghostbed.com poso. Promo code poso. And by the way, Tanya Taylor, she loved it. All right, guys, Jack posobic. Here we are back live. Human Events Daily. We're here in Dallas, Texas, and it is CPAC setup day. So, yeah, we're here. CPAC is getting set up. Our set is currently being constructed just out of shot here, right downstairs. And where we're at right now, we've got a 90 foot rap set that's being put together, but it wasn't really ready quite yet for showtime today. I'm told it'll be ready for War Room later this afternoon. So stay tuned for that. It's really going to just blow your mind when you see the amount of the skill, the craftsmanship, the production level that we put together. So this is just sort of a temporary setup because, you know, we. Our show comes a little bit earlier, but we wanted to be here. We are on the ground. CPAC starting up. Kev, talk about how, you know, we just saw Liz Truss is here walking by. You know. Kev, talk about we just saw the police come by, the security.
- [25:10]
D
Yes. How are you all doing? It was great. It's great to see. There's so many people coming. We got the boys in blue in town. We got the schlapps here. Matt and Mercedes, they just came back from CPAC Budapest. We got lines out the door. Security setting up and the stages are almost ready. This place is gigantic. If you have ever been to a cpac, you would say Gaylord.
- [25:31]
A
Gaylord, Grapevine, Texas.
- [25:33]
D
Everywhere. Everywhere they have property. It's just. It's a whole. It's a whole area.
- [25:38]
A
It's a resort under it. It's a resort. It's an incredible place. It's gonna be a great time. If you're in the area, come down a seat back. But Kev, I tweeted something out this live stream too.
- [25:47]
E
Yeah.
- [25:47]
A
And I wanted to. I tweeted something out and it's. It's getting a lot of connection, getting a lot of heat. I. I got into the men versus women thing today. All right. Yeah. So let me.
- [25:56]
D
Let's, let's. We got.
- [25:57]
A
We got the two bros here, the posto bros. But I want to get in.
- [26:00]
D
Let's.
- [26:00]
A
Let's bring on a representative of the female gender to, to. To speak for them so we don't have to speak for them. And we've got, of course, my favorite anti communist, Evita Duffy joins us. What's up, Evita?
- [26:12]
B
Hey, Jack. Thanks. For having me.
- [26:16]
A
All right, so. So Vita, you're here. We got Kevin now. There was a poll that came out, I guess late last night and I was kind of parsing through it. They mentioned it on cnn. It's making the rounds all over the Internet about Trump's standing with men. And this new poll came out that said that Trump is now down 20 points with men. This is compared to the 2024 election. They said there's this male vote that's dropping out. And I tweeted out that when men don't vote, Democrats win. And my goodness, have I seen just it 3,000, you know, replies to this thing online. People are just coming out of the woodwork. It sparked this whole conversation. I think it's trending on X right now. So let's go. Let me go, Kev, real quick, from your perspective, you know, you talked, we're here in Dallas, Texas right now, but we do talk to folks back home in Pennsylvania, our circles, our friends. When you talk to people in Pennsylvania, the guys, what are they saying about the president? Are they, are they anti Trump now? What's the feeling? Why are men not at the same support levels?
- [27:28]
D
Well, it's funny you said they're coming out of the woodwork. I got that one because, you know, blue collar background myself, but the PA guys are, I mean, a lot of our friends, they're, yeah, mostly workers, blue collars. Like, you know, we'll just get up and work every single day of our lives. So I don't know what it's in regards to though, this poll, like 20% loss or 20 points down regarding what though, you know, what is the, I guess overarching narrative. So you got to ask yourself that. But overall, like being part of the muscular class, like most of us were way back Trump, you know, we've a three time voter myself, so I don't know what this poll is all about but, but you hit the nail on the head. Like if men don't vote like Democrats,
- [28:21]
A
what I hear and what I hear a lot, you know, just in like the Eagles fans group chat that we have is, is people saying they want more deportations, they want less focus on demand on international policy, more focus on that.
- [28:32]
D
I think that's what it would be
- [28:33]
A
to here as well. So question you, Evita, you know, that's what I'm hearing from the men. But for women, on the other hand, you know, you talk to female conservatives, but you're also just, you know, Gen Z women as well. What is it that's going on in Gen Z with the men and the women. Why is it that the men are kind of, you know, coming down in terms of their Trump support? And why is it it that women are totally turning the other way?
- [28:58]
B
So I think first of all, this is actually not a men versus women issue. It's actually a married men, unmarried men, married women versus unmarried women issue. So in 2024, unmarried men, married men, and married women all voted for President Trump by double digit. Unmarried women, however, went for Kamala by like 30 points or more. So there is a big difference between regular married women and unmarried women.
- [29:32]
A
And so, yes, that's a huge point, Evita. I just realized that we've got a break. We got a break coming up. 10 seconds. Hold that point. We'll come right back to you as soon as we come back. Jack Bosoba, Kevin Posobic, Vita Duffy, CPAC setup day here in the great state of Texas. Right back. Where's Jack? Where's Jack? Where is he? Jack, I want to see you. Great job, Jack. Thank you. What a job you do. You know, we have an incredible thing. We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys should be getting Pulitzers. All right, Jack. So back live here, Human Events Daily. Want to go back to Evita Duffy. We got caught up by the break there. And Evita, you were talking about how there's actually a split in the data between it's, it's not just men versus women. It's, it's that there's a married versus single quotient that people all should also be looking at. Yeah.
- [30:34]
B
And if you think about it, it actually makes perfect sense, just intuitive for an unmarried woman. Women, what are you looking for in your life? Most of all, what is missing? It's the security of a male. And so young women and unmarried women especially are saying, looking at the Democratic Party, which is entirely based off of offering free things and social programs. And they say, that's my party. That's what I want to go towards. That's my gravity. And so they, they, they, they vote very, very poorly. Now, since 1992, women have consistently outperformed men electorally, meaning, like they get out the vote way more than men do. And it's a big problem if we have male apathy in these midterms because that means we are essentially for Democrats. A couple of reasons why that may be happening. Or at least for Gen Z, man. We talked about this last time I was on the show, Jack. We have a War right now in Iran, there's a narrative there's going to be a 20 year forever war. And there's also a narrative that President Trump is going to bring back the draft. I don't think Carolyn Levitt said that Democrats have spun her words to mean that. And so that is deeply troubling if you're a 22 year old, 23 year old man getting ready to go to the polls. Oh, if I vote for Republicans, I'm voting to go to war overseas. And the White House hasn't done enough to actually correct the record on that and dispel those fears.
- [31:57]
A
You know, it's so interesting you mentioned that because when, when the producers and I were putting the show together today, that's one of the specific things that I brought up is talking about how there was. And you're right, I don't think Caroline said that at all. What she said was all options are on the table and that she hadn't discussed it with the president. And yet the media spun that as to her saying that Trump is possibly considering a draft. And what did they do? That was a psyop directly targeting young men online. So Kevin, when it, when it comes to that, you know, as, as a, you know, for men of military fighting age, you know, why is it that men are, you know, from what you're, you would see, Kev, why is it that men would not be into the draft? Why do you see that? You know, because typically men are more, you know, seems more aggressive, more physical. You know, why would men not be into that as much?
- [32:46]
D
Well, men would be, be into it as much. You got to take into account of social media and how news spreads so fast nowadays compared to the last time America had a draft in. So, so I would say that Vietnam, yeah, Vietnam and Zoomers and younger generation of men are much more informed these days of anything really. I mean facts and narratives and counter narratives. It's just everybody so plugged into the news. So that's why you have this flash poll. Like, of course it's like anti war and there's a gigantic America first narrative amongst zoomers and you know, war and also with Trump and JD as well. Like, I mean that's what we're, we're pushing for moving forward. So there's just lots of questions like whereas in Vietnam, Vietnam, we didn't have like daily updates of the straight of hormones.
- [33:41]
A
Well, I would say, I would say Vietnam was the first time that we started to get those daily war updates. Right? It was the first one. It was like the first war on tv.
- [33:52]
D
Yeah. That's images. Yeah.
- [33:54]
A
Coming back, I get what you're saying. You're saying prior to when the draft was in place, and I think it was seeing that that led to the end of the draft in general. But the Iran war draft hoax, and that's we're going to call it, it is a hoax. It has been absolutely devastating for a lot of young men. Unloved. Actually, if you talk to me about that, because this is something that I've sensed because I hear it a lot. But do you see this? You know, you've always sort of been our TikTok whisperer when you go out there, is this something that you see a lot of people talking about?
- [34:23]
B
You mean like the war and young men not wanting to fight?
- [34:28]
C
I'm sorry.
- [34:29]
A
Well, the draft, like specifically, specifically a draft.
- [34:33]
B
Yes. And it's actually been a problem for, it's actually been a question for young women as well because there's been talk of actually including women in the draft too. So there, so it's actually, you know, it doesn't matter gender wise. They're both freaking out about it. Something that I think is important to keep in mind is we also have a big social difference between men and women right now. Like there is, I think it was an NBC poll that found after the 2020, 2024 election, the personal success definition for men was, was the number one part of their personal success was defined by having children. And for young women, for Gen Z women having children was the second least important part of their definition of personal success. So there's, there's also just a big, like, value gap between young men and young women. And that's actually been very positive for the GOP because young men, instead of kind of leaning left as they usually do with their female counterparts, are actually gravitating toward the gop. And yet now you're seeing this hyper fixation on the draft, on Iran, on foreign policy, and it's taking away all this momentum in the ground that we gained with President Trump in 2024. At least that's the polling saying we'll find out once we actually go to go to the polls and November and see what happens after these midterms. But if the polls mean anything, it's that we are losing ground with young men. And it's going to be a huge problem because again, we rely on this demographic to, to win. Now,
- [36:04]
A
Evita, let's, so let's say, you know, I'm not completely on the spot about this, but you know, you're out there, you're talking specifically for Gen Z. What would you say, and this is something that Charlie Kirk focused on so much. What would you say would be ways to start to win back that cohort?
- [36:24]
B
Well, so I think focusing on the things that really matter to young people just across the board. You know, Charlie Kirk talked a lot about debt slavery. He talked a lot about how young people are going to college and they spend this exorbitant amount of money on a degree that's off to any times worse worthless than they go and they try to find a job and jobs and there aren't that many opportunities out there. Right. This is why Trump's tariffs are actually very important and beneficial to young Americans because we are not inheriting the same kind of American dream as our parents and grandparents. And people are using buy now, pay later schemes like Klarna to buy their groceries. It's a massive problem. We're growing up in an America that is radically different from that of our parents and grandparents. And so, and the immigration issue as well plays into this, Jack, because you we've talked on the show many times about housing and how unaffordable it is for young people. The average first time homebuyer is 40 years old. A major contribution is that we have a massive influx of individuals who are not supposed to be in this country who are now demanding housing which then drives up the price of rent and the price of home ownership. So, and then of course inflation plays into this and the cost of so forever wars plays into this. So focusing on what can we do to make life better? The American dream accessible, real bread and butter issues that President Trump, frankly has been a champion of his entire life is how you bring, bring things back for young people and bring them back into the GOP fold. It's delivering for them and it's also actually focusing on those issues.
- [37:57]
A
I think that's exactly right. Delivering for Gen Z, focusing on the issues that are directly relevant for them. That's so key because, you know, we can all get caught up in the news of the day, issues of war and peace, geopolitics. And of course we here at human Events, we focus on geopolitics so much. But at the same time we have to remember that for the average voter, you know, and I have to bring it up me to that, that video that's going viral about the, you know, the spring breakers and they're asking them about Venezuela and Iran and all the rest and that this just so completely beyond anything they're focused on whatsoever.
- [38:37]
B
Well, I think that, you know, that communication is also really key here. I think a lot, I think the way we've seen some edits trying to get people hyped up about what's going on overseas with some military edits. When I talk about to a lot of young people, the reality is that they don't really understand what we're doing overseas. And I don't think that that's necessarily because we're not there for any kind of reason. It just needs to be transparency, communication. Because again, the most important thing for all of us to be focusing on is not the infighting, not, you know, okay, should we be doing this? Not. I'm happy to coalesce and support the president, get behind the president. It's just about having transparency, especially with those younger voters who are confused and they're getting inculcated with lies from the Democratic media. Right. Saying things like Trump's about to implement. Yes,
- [39:25]
A
no question. Vduffy, where can people go to follow you and get attention to your ransom raves?
- [39:30]
B
B2 Duffy underscore one on X and Instagram. My husband is running for Congress. His website is Alfonso for Wisconsin.com F O R.
- [39:41]
A
All right, go and give them both a follow right back here at Human Events Daily. Quick, folks, if you're a homeowner in America, you need to listen to this. Well, the FBI has been warning about a new type of real estate fraud on the rise called home title theft. And your equity is their target. Here's how it works. Criminals forge your signature on a single document, use a fake notary stamp and file it with the county. And just like that, on record, they own your home. They will use your ownership, take out loans against your equity or even sell your property. And you won't know about it until foreclosure or collection notices show up in the mail. That's why I partnered with Home Title Lock, so you can protect your equity. And find out today if you're already a victim, use our promo code poso@home title lock.com and you'll get a free title history report and a free trial of their million dollar triple lock protection. That's 24,7 monitoring of your title records, urgent alerts to any changes. And if fraud occurs, their US based restoration team will spend up to $1 million to fix it. Don't be a victim. Protect your equity today. That's home title lock.com promo code POSO. So we're going to call this the Jack Bock Appreciation Hour. I can say Confidently, I believe. I think Josh Shapiro would be the vice presidential nominee if it wasn't for Jack Bock. And that is. Folks, let me tell you something. I've been doing a lot of travel lately. I've been running around and I'll tell you exactly what keeps me going every single day around here, and it's blackout coffee. You got to support them the way I support them. And by the way, blackout coffee is amazing. It is the best coffee that you will drink. We're talking about a family run American company roasting fresh coffee right here in the usa. Built by people who believe in hard work, freedom, and this country, 2026 is a huge year. This year marks the 250th anniversary of the United States of America. And blackout coffee is celebrating it all year long with new roasts, limited editions, and some very exciting releases coming. I drink blackout coffee every single day. Whether it's a morning show, a late night, a travel day, all of it. It's smooth, it's strong, and it's always fresh. Once you switch, there's no going back. They've got something for everyone. Morning Reaper, their bestselling medium roast. We're talking smooth, never bitter. Brutal awakening. A bold dark roast that actually wakes you up. And for 2026, you have got to try the 1776 dark roast. Rich, unapologetic, made to honor America's founding. And the two way medium roast. Smooth, balanced and perfectly named after the second amendment. Okay, Your coffee shows up fresh on schedule and you never run out. They also have instant coffee, which is a total game changer. We're not talking some weak gas station powder. We're talking real blackout coffee in a packet. No machine, no mess. Add water, stir, and you're ready to roll. Perfect for work, travel or keeping your desk or go bag. Go on over to blackout coffee.com poso and use promo code poso for 20% off your first order. That's blackout coffee.com poso support American jobs and celebrate 250 years of freedom. Drink coffee that tastes incredible because every sip should feel like a win. All right, Jack Zobeck, we are back live. We are on day one, setup day here at cpac. You'll be able to see the great RAV set just a little bit later today on the afternoon war room show. Kev, tell them a little bit about the set just real quick.
- [43:11]
D
Oh, we have a bit of a catwoman walk this year.
- [43:13]
A
Oh, the cat. Kevin. Wait, Kevin's eyeing up the catwalk.
- [43:16]
D
Yeah, they.
- [43:16]
A
Folks, if you want to see Kev on the catwalk. That might be the last. You doing the doy do up there.
- [43:22]
D
Do you got to donate so we can get cowboy hats?
- [43:24]
A
You got to donate. If you donate. Kevin, Kevin, look at this. Kevin's asking for singles, already sees a catwalk. Kevin's. Look, folks, Kevin needs a little gas money. He had to drive all the way here from Florida. It's, it's a terrible situation. What can I say? But, but, but folks, since we're talking polling today, I had to get into this new poll that came out. And Kev, I know you saw this as well. The Concerned Veterans of America, you know, put out their new poll of, of veterans. And this was so incredibly important, especially as America is embarking on another military conflict. And so Darren Selnick from there is coming on to join us. He's also the former deputy chief of staff for Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon. Darren, how are you?
- [44:03]
G
I, I'm doing great. This post is actually some veteran action, so we want to make sure everyone knows directly. And you can go to veterinaction.org
- [44:17]
A
right, right. So veterans action. Exactly. So talk to us a little bit about the findings of this poll. Veterans concerns not only on questions about war, questions about boots on the ground, but also questions about how veterans are taking care of the veterans care when they come home.
- [44:36]
C
Right.
- [44:36]
G
So some interesting poll dynamics done by Rasmussen for us on the Iran war. We're talking about 61% of military veterans support the war in terms of their health care. Because remember, after the war, where do you, where do you go after you've been injured? You go to the VA and with the VA in terms of investors bill rights, which is one of the bills we're supporting, 94% want to make sure that they are properly taken care of and properly have their rights and treated properly by the VA. Veterans Access act is supported internals by up to 90% and 75% of veterans say they're more likely to vote for someone if they support that. So another key question is do veterans want choice of community care versus facilities? 90% want so very, very high numbers both in terms of the ability to have your have your rights, veterans bill rights, Veterans Access act and choice and community. And these are the bills that have been done because Biden broke VA and Trump is having to fix it again just like they had to fix it after Obama.
- [45:51]
A
Well, I think that's incredible. And we're also seeing, you know, I'm looking through some of the across tabs you're Seeing a lot of just support for President Trump across the board on this. You're seeing a lot of people saying that, a lot of military voters also saying that they're supporting the president. But it really does come down to that, care for access, that people are wanting more of that when they come home from, from the war. Is that the idea?
- [46:14]
G
Well, absolutely. You know, you serve your country, you get wounded, you have military conditions, you should be able to get the best care in the country. And you shouldn't have a bureaucrat that stopped you. President Trump ended the bureaucracy stopping you. Biden put the bureaucracy back in. Trump had to end it again. And we learned some tricks from what happened. So that's where the Veterans Access act fixes what Biden broke, but also does some additional enhancements. So veterans should be able to be the center of the va. That's what the VA is for. And there's some bureaucrats who don't treat veterans right. That's only these veterans bill rights by taking away their guns, red flagging in health care centers. So Senator Blackburn is a champion for that and Veterans Access Act Chairman Moran is as well. So we need to, we have a lot of fixing up to do. And you know, and the numbers show that the, you know, Veterans are only 57% happy with the way they're getting their services. So we need to get that number back up. It's very important that veterans get the care that they're confident in the VA and that's what these bills are going to do.
- [47:24]
A
And when we see that as well and Erkev, do you have a question? You want to get in?
- [47:28]
D
I just had an extra comment, not a question, question. But I mean, if we're for funding the biggest military in the world and we're the best and we're voting for that, we're putting all this money, billions of dollars in new technology making America number one. That should extend into the VA and care for veterans after they retire or come home. And yeah, I would just want to make that statement. And then even earlier, you know, I'm pro military. So we should have even, you know, we had Hegseth come out about the revamp in the Boy Scouts, you know, so, so even before the military now, and you know, maybe there's some criticism of the draft, but if we had more incentives for before and after service funding as well, I guess that would be, that would be, I think received pretty well. We have so many, you know, hype edits and whatnot of National Guard and you know, all the Branches really, which is great. But you know, we, it. I think part of the pushback is there's not enough follow through. You know, I'll just throw it on there for veterans.
- [48:45]
A
Is that we can talk about. Yeah, we can talk about all sorts of. You talk about, you know, joining incentives, recruitment incentives.
- [48:50]
D
Yeah.
- [48:50]
A
Before and before and after and then post obviously. But at the same time, when we see the amount of money that's going out to Somalian fraud, we see the amount of the insane amounts of dollars of fraud that Doge pulled up. The illegal aliens getting money in this country. I don't want to spend a single dollar on another illegal alien. While there are homeless veterans in this country, there are veterans,
- [49:14]
D
veterans who can't
- [49:14]
A
get the services that they need. That's what it's about and I think that's what it's all about for all of us. Darren, tell people where they can go to get your coordinates and read more about this poll that just came out.
- [49:25]
G
You can go to veterinaction.org to read the poll and you can follow me on Darren. Selma on X. So every, all the information's out there. I posted it as well. Be educated and help us support the veterans in nation. Sure that they get the quality care and the timely care and the benefits that they rightfully earn and put their life in line for.
- [49:48]
A
Amen. Thank you so much on that. Hey, by the way, Kevin, let me just tell you something. Can I let you know a little secret? So I said, I said I don't want to spend a single dollar on illegals until we did that. But even if we were giving the veterans full funding and full benefits, I still wouldn't want to spend any money on illegal aliens.
- [50:07]
D
There it is.
- [50:07]
A
What can I say? I say, I say pull the plug on all of it, Deb. And we're going to debank. Debank them. And by the way, Cap.
- [50:14]
D
Yeah.
- [50:15]
A
Did you. But I saw some ice at the airport. Do you see some ice at the airports on the way here?
- [50:18]
D
I wanted to. I.
- [50:19]
A
So I just walked up to those guys and I said, I walked up to the ice guys and I said, hey guys, make sure you get them all. Make sure you get every last one ice. Go out there and do what you need to do. Bring it forth. Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have our permission to lay ashore.