
Loading summary
Jack Posobiec
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the POSO Daily Brief. It is completely free. It'll be one email that's sent to you every day. You can stop the endless scrolling trying to find out what's going on in your world. We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free. Go to humanevents.com poso Sign up today. It's called the POSO Daily Brief. Read what I read for show prep. You will not regret it. Human Events.com poso Totally free. The poso Daily Brief happens when the Fourth Turning meets Fifth Generation Warfare.
Evita Duffy
A commentator, international social media sensation and former Navy intelligence veteran.
Jack Posobiec
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobic. Christ is last night was to the heart of it. The human stories interwove right into the speech what President Trump's trying to accomplish. But most importantly, it showed the Democrats as almost, you know, Jack Bosobic book on human. It showed him almost as anti human.
Brian Glenn
America is back. I want to do what has not been done in 24 years. Balance the federal budget. We're going to balance the media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept saying we needed new legislation, we must have legislation, legislation to secure the border. But it turned out that all we really needed was a new president. The Doctors gave him five months at most to live. That was more than six years ago. And tonight, D.J. we're going to do you the biggest honor of them all. I am asking our new Secret Service director to officially make you an agent of the United States Secret Service during the disastrous and incompetent withdrawal from Afghanistan, perhaps the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country. Tonight I am pleased to announce that we have just apprehended the top terrorist responsible for that atrocity. And he is right now on his way here to face the swift sword of American justice.
Jack Posobiec
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard. Today's edition, Human Events daily. Today is March 5, 2025, Anno Domini. Today is Ash Wednesday period of 40 days, 40 nights before the arrival of Easter. And President Trump's speech last night, which we're going to be getting into, we're going to be breaking down. But there was one piece of it that I think a lot of people, a lot of people have skipped over, something a lot of people have missed and there's a lot from the speech, but something that I think was seminal, absolutely seminal. The perpetrator of the Abbey Gate attack has been captured and was brought to justice. And President Trump there in front of the assembled house and the Senate, the Supreme Court, the one time all year when you see all the power structure of Washington, D.C. assembled in one storied hall, he announced that the animal, the scum that took out 13 of our honored soldiers and Marines is being brought to justice. Because no matter where you are, no matter where you go, no matter where you try to hide, if you lay a hand on an American service member, if you lay a hand on American service member, and if you kill an American service member, you will be found and you will be brought to justice, no matter how many years it takes. That's the President of the United States that I want to have for my country. That's the commander in chief that I want for my military. That's the United States military and the government that I signed up for and swore an oath for. That if you're going to send someone downrange, that if you're going to put someone on deployment, that if you're going to go out there and they will faithfully execute the orders of the chain of command, and if they are killed in the line of duty, that their government will work tirelessly to go after anyone who perpetrated that and have them either brought to justice or sent to their maker. The fact that this scumbag was still going around sucking air, free air for four years after that attack, years after our honored dead were lying buried at Arlington National Cemetery, it was a disgrace. And President Trump stood up and did the right thing for those people, for our, for those families, and for all veterans and service members everywhere. God bless America. We'll be right back. America first truly means. Welcome to the second American Revolution. All right, Jack Prasupic, here we are back, human events daily. And right there in the capital that you're looking at, it's a rainy day in Washington, a stormy day in Washington because the days of thunder have arrived. The storm is crashing down. And let me tell you something, folks. Just a few weeks ago, Governor Kathy Hochul ordered the closure of live poultry markets in New York City due to this rising hysteria surrounding the H5N1 bird flu. Now, critics are warning that pandemic fears may be weaponized to challenge Trump's mandate and to undermine RFK Jr. And his vision as the leader of HHS. Now, is this a health crisis or a power play? Last summer, Dr. Peter McCullough warned about the bird flu, linking the virus rapid spread to gain of function research now a common practice at many labs. Globally, Dr. McCullough urges early prevention just in case, recommending a contagion emergency kit from the wellness company. His medical board approved solution with five critical life saving medications like Ivermectin, Tamiflu, a nebulizer and hydroxychloroquine. Yeah, that's right, I said it. Hydroxychloroquine. Now these medications, you can have access to them, Ivermectin as well as these hard to get medications because we know they are. In the event of another pandemic, get yours by filling out a digital intake form and your kit arrives in one to two weeks. Don't wait until the deep state puts whatever plan they might have into action. Stay ready for the unexpected. Head to TWC Health POSO and use promo code POSO to save $32 off plus free shipping. US residents only. That's TWC Health slash POSO. So we played that clip of Bannon earlier this morning talking about the response, the Democrat response to the State of the Union. It wasn't really a state of the union, but ceremonial, I would say it was a ceremonial state of the Union in many ways. Many, many ways. And this is something that was absolutely atrocious. It was disgusting. The way that they went forward and attack the president. The way that they went forward and did all this was a joke. It was disgusting and it was awful. I'm told now that we have Brian Glenn from the White House. He just participated in the president's press secretaries conference there. Brian, tell us, what were your key takeaways with Caroline Levitt today?
Charlie Kirk
Well, Jack, he kind of, I got some slap back on my ifb, by the way, if you guys can fix that. Basically, she unpacked the approval ratings from last night's speech. As far as Americans are favorable of his stance on Russia and Ukraine, favorable about immigration, favorable about tariffs. They felt optimistic that he was absolutely delivering the promises of the campaign. Just six weeks into that. Took some questions from the media. Obviously it didn't last as long as we thought. It was a slight delay in getting started. But just really kind of recapping such a successful speech last night on the House floor.
Jack Posobiec
And it was a successful speech. And that's something where the Democrats have had no response whatsoever. There's been no Democrat message, no unified front. 76% of Americans supported the speech, supported what they heard. And really, Brian, what President Trump did, he's embracing the common sense solutions to so many of these issues as well as, by the way, just bringing on those direct human moments, the connections with the angel moms and talking about their daughters signing executive orders right in person, going. And the moment with E.J. daniel, of course, the moment as well with the West Point cadet, I should say cadet select, because he has now been selected again. These were key moments that Democrats chose to attack. They chose to criticize in one case, very crudely criticized in times that they really. And by the way, having been an understanding of how these events are put together, you know, I don't think that the White House really was prepared because who could imagine that the opposition would be attacking moments such as that? Sure, okay, you're going to attack Doge and they're going to attack cuts and all of this and talk about austerity and talk about inflation, tariffs, but attacking these human stories. Brian, how is it that the Democrats would walk right into something like that?
Charlie Kirk
Yeah, we expect them to, you know, kind of stand up against the policies, we know that. But to stand up against something like a 13 year old boy who's battling brain cancer, who gets his honorary Secret Service badge, to stand up against the families of angel moms, things like that, that's a human issue. So really my question is this. What does the Democrat Party stand for in general? Not only physically, what would it take for Democrats to stand up and support anything? Because last night it's a big nothing burger for them. They have some big identity crisis in that party. There's no leadership. There's shots of House Democrats. I know Jasmine Crockett put a TikTok video up her, basically skipping and dancing down the hallways and dropping an F bomb in one of the press gaggles, one of the press arenas before this speech. So I don't know what they stand for. And I hope Americans, Jack, watched last night, the ones that maybe didn't even vote or maybe voted Democrat go, you know what do they really stand up for American values? Are they really working hard for me? And the answer is no. And President Trump showed his leadership. It was full on display last night.
Jack Posobiec
Well, and that's exactly what it is because these events, and I was talking about this last night on a live stream with Charlie Kirk, is that there are so many people who only plug in the politics at key moments, whether it's a presidential debate, whether it's one of the conventions, and then again for these State of the Union type addresses and to the sort of average non political follower, not non news junkie, like you know, like you and me, Brian, you know, and the other great folks around here is, you know, they're plugging in, they want to see what's going on. They're in, they're out. And what they saw was of course, a command performance from President Trump. But more to the point, what they saw from the other side was childish, it was raucous, it was juvenile. And at some point it was actually, it was just, just anti human. To attack a child with brain cancer, to attack a boy who wants to join West Point and serve his country. To go after these human interest cases, to not stand for them and not say, this is what makes our country great. This is what these are. Again, all of the cases, the use cases that you would say, well, these are the things the democr Democrats normally champion. But again, because their default is to oppose anything that is in association with Donald Trump. The problem is they are actually shrinking their circle smaller and smaller because I just don't know who wants to continue to support a shrill group like that. And that's why, by the way, you have a lot of Democrats, bigger and bigger names. Sigh. Simone, for example, at msnbc, calling out their behavior as saying, you guys really need to stop because you've completely lost the plot.
Charlie Kirk
Yeah, you're absolutely right. Because I was just going to mention if you turned on a lot of the legacy media, they kind of echoed a lot. Not all, but some echoed what the Democrats were doing. The lower third said, you know, Trump's divisiveness sets tone in speech. And the only people that were being divisive were the Democrats that weren't being supportive of just basic human success stories. That was that came up today in the briefing. Carolyn Levitt kind of made mention that, you know, you turn on your mainstream media, you've got negativity all day long. Their audience is shrinking. You know what? I saw an interesting post on X the other day and I'll try to find it and retweet it. Democrats strategize on how they can win moving forward. And believe it or not, there was three things they needed to focus on. More patriotism within their party, love of country, not getting behind radical candidates for some ideology that overwhelmingly the people of this country don't support. So they're trying to separate themselves from the crazies, but they better do a little better job than what they did last night because that was with the whole signs and the whole, you know, representatives.
Jack Posobiec
It was a complete joke. A complete joke. Right. You're there at the White House. We've got to run to a break. Where can people follow you?
Charlie Kirk
BRIAN Glenn, TV across the board. I appreciate it, Jack. Thank you.
Jack Posobiec
All right, thank you. Brian Behr, for real America's Voice want to also welcome in by the way, we are here in hour three of Charlie Kirk show his audience on the Salem Radio Network. Be right back.
Brian Glenn
Hey, you know, they talk about influencers. These are influencers and they're friends of mine. Jack. Where's Jack? Jack. He's got a great job.
Jack Posobiec
All right, folks, we're back. Jack Posobic here on human events daily. J.D. vance, by the way, Vice President, Secretary of Defense Hegseth and Dni Tulsi Gabbard have all just landed at the southern border. They are on their way to Eagle Pass as we speak at this very moment. Want to bring in here, we've got our favorite resident anti communist. Evita Duffy is joining us, host of Bungee Report, Early Edition, and she is also, I can see celebrating Ash Wednesday. Evita, how are you?
Evita Duffy
I'm doing so good, Jack. And I do have my ashes. And I was telling you before the show started, I had to get them before I came on because I knew that you would give me crap if I didn't have my ashes on. And I went to Ash Wednesday mass in the evening instead.
Jack Posobiec
I absolutely would have a veto. You did the right thing. And so when, when, you know, when we look at the speech, though, we look at the response to this from the Democrats there. I wrote this book on humans last year. You and I have been talking about communism for years and years and years. And what it talks about is the fact that the communist, the leftist, is not animated by justice. They claim they are, but they're not. They're actually animated by resentment. They are animated by resentment, envy, heady jealousy, greed, all of these various envies that they have coalesced into this completely incoherent gobbledygook that they claim is a political ideology, but it doesn't make any sense. And it was never supposed to because that's not actually what they stand for. Can you combine this for us, Evita? Why was it that the Democrats were so resentful of the positive thing? A child with brain cancer getting a chance to be on national TV and recognized by the Secret Service, someone going to join West Point and serve his country. Why was the resentment the response from the Democrats?
Evita Duffy
It was such a human moment, Jack. I'm not even going to lie. I started to tear up. I started to tear up when this little boy was received this honorary title and he gave the hug and it was so emotional and it was so beautiful and it was so human. And this is somebody who has nothing, right? I mean, this is a young child who survived brain cancer. The worst of the worst. You're a young kid and you have your whole life ahead of you, and this horrible thing happens. And it was just, I think it's a moment that highlighted as you saw the contrast of this young boy in this beautiful moment that real humans would all be touched by. You saw them sitting, you saw these, these women in their frumpy pink blazers, angrily with their arms crossed, frowning at this moment. That was incredible. And you have to think, why? Is, is, is the, the Trump derangement is the envy. And it's not just, you said, it's envy of, of the have nots. It's also about power, right? They're angry. They see Trump delivering this, this speech. They see that their, their colleagues on the other side of the aisle are cheering and they're happy because the right has won, and they are furious at this. And for that reason, they can't even bring themselves, Jack, to take joy in one of the most human moments that I have seen since President Trump's election.
Jack Posobiec
And, and that, that, that's key to me. That's absolute key, because anything that's associated with Trump, anything that's associated with their political enemies, they view as the adversary. So, by the way, you know, so for all the Schmittians out there who say that, you know, all politics is friend, foe, distinction. There you go, there you go. That's the answer to your question. He's just right. You know, you don't have to sit there and say, oh, I disagree with this thing you wrote. No, no, no, he's just right. Politics does boil down to this, the friend, enemy distinction. And that's clearly what the Democrats showed on full display. They view all of these things as political enemies because they're associated with a political enemy. And so all of their flowery talk about justice and equality and equity, it flies out the window. Why? Because this is what their politics truly is. Mask off moment. One minute to the break of eat it up.
Evita Duffy
Well, Jack, I think that if you look at the way that Democrats view the world, if you are somebody who doesn't have power or doesn't have really political utility to them, they don't value you. They'll value a woman who wants the right to abortion, but not the child who's being aborted, who can't cast a vote, I think that is, that, that is at the heart of this. And so this young man has no political utility to them. They can't take joy in this moment because it helps Trump, because it, look, it reflects well on him. That is how deranged they are.
Jack Posobiec
It's complete derangement. It is mental illness as a political ideology. It's not. And, and people say, oh well, it's incoherent. We're going to point out the double standards. And this is another part of it too. If you point out the double standard and hypocrisy, they don't care because they don't actually believe it. There's so many things that we can use here to teach about this, but I want to teach about something else that just happened with this latest Supreme Court decision that came out, including Amy Coney Barrett will be right back here. Human Events Daily as well as the third hour of the Charlie Kirk program with his audience, the Salem Radio Network.
Brian Glenn
And Jack. Where's Jack? Where's Jack? Where is he? Jack, I want to see you. Great job, Jack. Thank you. What a job you do. You know, we have an incredible thing. We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys and these are the guys who'd be getting policies.
Jack Posobiec
Jack Posobic here back live. Human Events Daily. You're looking down at a rainy national mall there in Washington D.C. we are getting a little bit of a rainstorm hitting us, folks. On January 20, 2025, the White House declared a national emergency, national energy emergency specifically. It wouldn't be a surprise if we started experiencing more frequent power outages as well as electronic magnetic pulse or EMP attacks. Electromagnetic that could fry all electronics in the country and shut down the grid for months or even years. Most people can't survive without electricity. That's why my Patriot supply has just released the new grid. Dr. 3300. This is the first solar generator with revolutionary EMP intercept technology. This groundbreaking system will protect your backup power from devastating EMP attacks, ensuring your family stays safe and comfortable when others are left in the dark. With an industry leading 3,300 watts of power. It runs everything from refrigerators, freezers to medical devices and power tools. Plus it includes a free 200 watt waterproof solar panel for unlimited renewable energy. Do not wait until it's too late. Get your grid. Dr. 3300 with EMP Intercept Technology now at mypatriotsupply.com Secure your family's future with my patriotsupply.com My patriotsupply.com so the breaking news that came out just before we went to air here was this new Supreme Court ruling striking down the plan to defund usaid, specifically the DOGE plan by stopping payments. Now I've looked into some of the details of the case. And I want people to understand that there's still going to be other bites at the apple with usaid. First of all, the ruling was only on the emergency injunction. The underlying case is still working its way through the appeals process. It's then going to go to, to the, from the, from the local court, from the district court, the circuit court. It's then going to go up to the Supreme Court when that happens. So we know all of that's going to take place. This was the emergency appeal. There's also an underlying contract issue. So it's more than just the funding of usaid. And there's other ways that we'll get bites at this Apple ii, one of which, of course, is going to be in the budgetary process. But there's something that I wanted to get into and I wanted to discuss. This is big. This is really big. Amy Coney Barrett. The role of Amy Coney Barrett, someone who voted against this, against the conservatives, against the conservative majority on this. Something where Alito and so many others are coming out saying, what are you doing? How can you allow for one local federal judge to enact an emergency injunction that binds the entire nation? Clearly, the founders did not intend for that framework to make any sense whatsoever. But then you also have this case of Amy Coney Barrett, and she is someone who, by the way, humanevents.com actually ran a story saying that we were a little bit, a little bit concerned about Amy Coney Barrett all the way back in 2019, 2019, asking if she was really the best choice, if she was really the best choice for Supreme Court. Well, came out and said that she was not. That was from John Smirak, and he took a lot of guff for publishing that all the way back in 2019. And now we see her rule on case after case after case siding with the liberals. Although, of course, she also did take out Roe v. Wade. I want to bring on Evita Duffy here because I want to go through some of this. You know, Evita, I don't know if you've looked at X. I know you said you were at Mass. People are outraged. People are outraged against Amy Coney Barrett. It's something that's going completely viral right now. And they say, what is wrong? How is this someone who. Look, is she more conservative than the person that she replaced? Sure. Okay, fine. Yet it seems like she falls in with the liberals on every single issue outside of pro life. So was this the cost of overturning Roe v. Wade, or is this just someone who is completely sort of in line with this kind of like Pope Francis version of Catholicism. And here we are discussing the Catholics on the court on Ash Wednesday, which is kind of different from the more conservative, shall we say, Benedictine version of Catholicism. That, by the way, Alito and Gorsuch, I believe, and of course, Clarence Thomas are also all Catholic, yet they don't exactly agree with Amy Coney Barrett. Wanted to get into that with you, Evita. What's your take?
Evita Duffy
Well, she probably is a Vatican II Catholic. Check. She probably loves to shake hands. She likes it when the minister is like, not a priest, but like some woman who is like, completely irrelevant to the Mass or the order of the Mass. But, but in all serious, I have been shocked by the way that Amy Coney Barrett has, has. Has ruled on so many of these cases. I remember the hype around her. I remember the way that conservatives fought for her, that we, I mean, we put it all on the table. We went to bat for this woman because the left was coming down on her really hard. They, I think they probably knew the way that she would rule on Roe v. Wade. I have close family members who were affected by her decision when it came to the military vaccine mandate. I'm going to tell you what, Jack. The one that makes me the most upset was her ruling on Missouri v. Murthy and the way that she just said, apparently the federal government seems to have the right to just go in and direct the censorship of social media companies, censor directly regular Americans, directly and indirectly through various NGOs that were set up by the government itself, through, you know, founded by. By former CIA officials. So, I mean, it has been really troubling to see the way she has ruled on so many of these cases. We fought really hard for her, and it did not pan out the way we wanted to. And this, this latest case, I think is going to potentially set a really negative precedent that some lower, lower court judge can just say, yep, the American people have to continue paying billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid that now we know what it's going toward, right? Transgender surgeries in Peru and in some cases, promoting atheism in Nepal. Completely meaningless, pointless that. Now, I guess a judge can just come in and say, you have to continue payments for.
Jack Posobiec
Also, I want to make a slight correction. Gorsuch was raised Catholic, but he is now no longer Catholic. He is actually, in fact, Episcopalian, which is the American version of the Anglican Church. However, Roberts, Thomas Alito, Sotomayor Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett are all Catholics. So we've got a Catholic super majority on the Supreme Court right now. That is six out of the nine. We also have two Protestants and one Jew, Elena Kagan. And so the question there is, I guess I have a vita, is why is it then. Because you get this all the time. They'll say, like, well, you Catholics are all this and you Catholics are all that. But in fact, we've got a huge split. We've got huge splits here among the Catholics, like Sotomayor and Thomas couldn't be more radically different in terms of their jurisprudence, and yet they're all Catholic. And so when you were talking about the Vatican II Catholics, and when I mentioned a Pope Francis Catholic as opposed to a Pope Benedict Catholic, we are talking about very deep splits in the faith and something that. That I think comes down to this huge sort of like, reformist movement that's really been pushing to the forefront a lot in Catholicism. But at the same time, you're also finding in the Catholic movement, particularly. Particularly among a lot of zoomers, which I think you know something about, where you actually see zoomers embracing traditional Catholicism. What's going on?
Evita Duffy
I mean, it's such a good question, Jack. And I'll just say preface by saying, I met Clarence Thomas. He was actually the one that swore my dad into office, and he's the most amazing man, and he is traditional. And I truly. He is one of the only people that I've met in D.C. who I would trust with my life, who I just think is a genuinely moral person. Then you have. You're right. These. Diff. These. These other Catholics who are Catholic in name, and they don't seem to share any of the same values as someone like Clarence Thomas. And it makes people wonder. And I think that there has been infiltration in the Catholic Church, Jack. I think this has been happening for decades. I think it's been purposeful, purposeful. And you. There is a rejection of tradition, a dumbing down of the faith. You even take what's. What we're in right now. We're entering into Lent. Sash Wednesday. The way that the medieval Christians used to handle Lent was very based. I mean, there was. There was no meat anytime, right? It was not just Fridays. And they. They ate, you know, a little bit of bread and herbs, and they. They were really taking the penance and the fasting seriously. And young people right now are craving that. In a world where everything is about comfort and about personal happiness, people are desiring. I think people need suffering to feel good. This is the reward system of humanity. This is actually God's design that we suffer. And then you have the reward of Easter, you have the fulfillment of your reward in heaven. Right? You toil here on earth, you do good here, and then you get your eternal reward. Young people are craving this. This is why you're seeing a lot of conversions to Islam, because they do take their faith seriously, as flawed as it is. And we need to return to that if we're going to stand any sort of chance at taking back the west and keeping the Western Christian values alive and not being drowned out by secularism or Islam or otherwise.
Jack Posobiec
Well, I couldn't agree more. And, you know, when I look at the jurisprudence of Amy Coney Barrett, I just have to say it. You know, DEI is alive and well in Republican politics. It really is. And I think a lot of conservatives and, you know, come at me if you want, but a lot of conservatives have to actually wake up and look at themselves in the mirror and say, all right, guys, are we really against dei or do we just say that we're against these programs? But when it comes to Republican politics or the people who get platformed in conservative media or all of these other things, are we not also following those same DEI practices? And I think that with Amy Coney Barrett's decision here and a number of the decisions that you've just mentioned, it gives us an opportunity to finally sit down and actually have that conversation.
Evita Duffy
And, Jack, maybe this is a little bit of a controversial take here, but I'll mention that there's a bipartisan effort right now in Congress to not have in person voting, that we want to be able to vote remotely because working mothers, mothers who are members of Congress, can't handle it. And I'll just say I don't think that's a good reason. That's not a good reason. And if you are a mother and you want to spend time with your. Your infant child, which I think is a beautiful thing, maybe you shouldn't be in Congress if you can't make this work. And I. That sounds bad, Jack, but I don't.
Jack Posobiec
Think it sounds bad at all.
Evita Duffy
Go ahead.
Jack Posobiec
I was gonna say, I don't think it sounds bad at all. I think it sounds wonderful. Mothers spending time with their children. Yes. That's incredible. In fact, that's what newborns, as a matter of fact, absolutely need. We're coming up on a quick break, folks. We're dropping all the thought crimes here. We are getting in tons of trouble. But why not? Because it's Ash Wednesday and we are letting it all out. Will be right back here. Jack Posobic, Vita Duffy on who knows, maybe this will be the last episode of Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice, third hour of Charlie Kirk on the Salem Radio Network.
Brian Glenn
Jack is a great guy. He's written a fantastic book. Everybody's talking about it. Go get it. And he's fit, my friend. Right. This is the beginning of this whole beautiful event, and we're going to turn it around and make our country great again.
Jack Posobiec
Amen.
Tulsi Gabbard
I let myself feel joy about D.J. and I hope he's alive for another, you know, 95 years.
Evita Duffy
Right.
Tulsi Gabbard
And I hope he lives the life he wants to live. He wants to be a cop. He knows what he wants to do. And I hope he has a long life as a law enforcement officer. But I hope he never has to defend the United States Capitol against Donald Trump's supporters. And if he does, I hope he isn't one of the six who loses his life to suicide. And I hope he isn't one who has to testify against the people who carried out acts of seditious conspiracy and then live to see Donald Trump pardon those people.
Unknown Commentator
For the record, and this is disgusting, the president made a spectacle out of praising a young man who serves thus far survived pediatric cancer. As if the president had something to do with that. This was in the midst of him praising Doge. Doge cuts, among other things, have cut off funding for ongoing research into pediatric cancer.
Jack Posobiec
All right, guys, we are back here. Washington, D.C. jack Posobic along with Evita Duffy. We're talking about the curious case of Amy Coney Barrett and Evita. When, when we cut this off, you know, we, we're, we're breaking all the rules around here. But, but, you know, we might as well, right? It's, it, it really is this kind of, this kind of mindset where it's like the conservatives have a question. It's like, what role do we want to actually have in society? Are we still going to play by, like, do we want to be the woke lights? Do we want to be the woke light and uphold most of these sort of like, sociological liberal shibboleths that they've, they've enacted since the Obama era? And are we just anti trans, but we're supporting all of the other, like, liberal stuff and that's like a woke light or are we, in fact actually standing for traditional society? And by the way, I'm all for it, but, like, tell me which one we're going to be, right?
Evita Duffy
It's so True, Jack. And this is the curse of conservatism, right? It's, it's what, what it is to be conservative is evolving and changing every day. And so you know, yesterday we were like no gay marriage and today we're like, well, let's just not trance the children, but adults are fine. And it's radically different because it's not really something to, to stand on the idea of just conservatism. That's why I like to use the word traditionalist or, or I'm a medievalist, I'll say, or something like that. But just conservative has become really meaningless. And I think to your point, Jack, it's not a winning game. And you can look to the left to know that it's not a winning game. I think that with Hillary Clinton they tried to kind of play it in the middle. I know that we think they're the radical and many of them are, but in reality Democrat. The DNC has been very controlling of their more radical voices and they have pushed to the side people like Bernie Sanders or AOC and promoted people who toe the party line who don't go too far. And it hasn't served them well. Young people hate it. If they were actually smart Democrats, I think they would go for an aoc. I think they would go as radical left as they can. Left wing populism and they might start winning. I'm not trying to give them any, but I think the same goes for us.
Jack Posobiec
This is, by the way, I keep trying to explain this to people and I go back to the book on humans. When people look at the popularity of Luigi Mangione, right? This is, there's an explanation for this. There's an explanation because people are upset, people are resentful. People don't like their lot in society. They don't like the way things are going. And so there is a version of left wing populism out there that can become extremely popular and is extremely popular. It's also extremely murderous and violent and destroys society altogether. But you can't sit there and look at the popularity of this guy and then. And not tell me that it's a real thing. Particularly among, among Gen Z. I mean.
Evita Duffy
It helps that he's attractive, right? But what he stands for is, is really at gets to the heart of leftism, of chaos, of really no, no morals, no standards. This is. Luigi Mangioni is exactly why I'm terrified of the left. And I hope that regular Democrats continue to keep their party in line for the sake of us all. But that is where the energy is. Jack, you're 100% right. People are.
Jack Posobiec
And Hasan Piker. Hasan Piker just called for the murder of Senator Rick Scott the other day. So this is the guy who he streams with aoc. Yeah, he has this very, very much the overlap of audience that we're talking about. He does the video game stuff on Twitch. Twitch only suspended him for one day. One day suspension over this. And by the way, nobody on the left is actually going to be bothered by this. They're going to say, yeah, you're right, this guy. And then, you know, there was a Medicare thing and he brought it up. They don't actually care. And by the way, Evita, I'll break, I'll go ahead and since, since you gone and gone and broken a few thought crimes, I'll break one here or commit a thought crime, I guess breaking the thought laws that if the Ouija Magione's target or Hasan Piker's target had not been an affluent white Christian male, then in fact the left would hate it because again, it's not about health care, it's not about justice, it's about going after their enemy groups and their enemy classes. So let's say Luigi Maggione had and again for hypothetical sake of argument that this was some African American in a committed same sex relationship. Well, they'd be disowning Luigi Maggione, they'd be calling him racist, they'd be saying horrible things about him. They would not be celebrating him the way they are. And I guarantee you there's a connection here. It is rich white men that they want to completely eradicate from society and that is fueled by resentment. The same resentment that we saw last night. Evita, we are at the end of the show. Where can people go and find follow all of your great insights.
Evita Duffy
Well, my, my Instagram and my X account are Avita Duffy underscore one. And if you want to listen to my show bunching a report early edition live 9am eastern time rumble.com so that's right, Bungee reports.
Jack Posobiec
So you're basically a fed now, Avena. Is that how it works? Like you're basically a. Because you're like. Because you're on Bina Report and he's a fed. So you're basically a fed by way of proxy. Evita Duffy are fed by way of proxy are my favorite anti communist. Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission play a short.
Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec: Episode Summary
Title: THE UNHUMAN RESPONSE TO TRUMP'S PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS, THE LEFT HAS EMBRACED ANTI-HUMANITY
Release Date: March 5, 2025
Host: Jack Posobiec
Guests: Evita Duffy, Charlie Kirk
In this episode of Human Events Daily, host Jack Posobiec delves into the aftermath of President Donald Trump's recent presidential address. The discussion centers on the Democrats' reaction, which Posobiec and his guests characterize as "anti-human" and deeply resentful. The episode also explores broader themes such as media bias, Supreme Court decisions, and the evolving nature of conservatism.
Jack Posobiec opens the discussion by highlighting the significance of President Trump's speech, particularly his announcement regarding the capture of the perpetrator behind the Abbey Gate attack, which resulted in the loss of 13 American service members.
Notable Quote:
"The perpetrator of the Abbey Gate attack has been captured and was brought to justice. [...] if you lay a hand on American service member, you will be found and you will be brought to justice, no matter how many years it takes."
— Jack Posobiec [01:05]
Posobiec emphasizes Trump's commitment to justice for fallen soldiers, portraying him as a strong and decisive leader who stands firmly behind military personnel and their families.
The core of the episode critiques the Democratic Party's response to Trump's address. Posobiec and his guests argue that Democrats failed to present a unified front and instead exhibited childish and deranged reactions, particularly attacking human interest stories that Trump shared.
Notable Quotes:
"It was just, just anti human. To attack a child with brain cancer, to attack a boy who wants to join West Point and serve his country."
— Jack Posobiec [09:20]
"They are actually animated by resentment, envy, heady jealousy, greed..."
— Jack Posobiec [16:10]
Evita Duffy adds that Democrats' negativity stems from their perception of everything associated with Trump as an adversary, leading them to undermine positive human stories that align with American values.
The discussion moves to the role of mainstream media in shaping public perception. Posobiec criticizes media outlets for allowing Democratic narratives to dominate and suppressing the positive aspects of Trump's leadership.
Notable Quote:
"When you turn on your mainstream media, you've got negativity all day long. Their audience is shrinking."
— Charlie Kirk [13:26]
This segment underscores the belief that media bias contributes to the Democrats' decreasing support and the erosion of their messages' effectiveness.
A significant portion of the episode addresses recent Supreme Court rulings, particularly focusing on Justice Amy Coney Barrett's decisions, which Posobiec and Duffy view as contrary to conservative values despite her conservative background.
Notable Quotes:
"Amy Coney Barrett has ruled on so many of these cases siding with the liberals. Although, of course, she also did take out Roe v. Wade."
— Jack Posobiec [26:32]
"The one that makes me the most upset was her ruling on Missouri v. Murthy..."
— Evita Duffy [27:00]
Posobiec points out a perceived inconsistency in Barrett's rulings, questioning her alignment with conservative jurisprudence and expressing concern over the future implications for policies like foreign aid and social media censorship.
The conversation shifts to the evolving definition of conservatism. Both Posobiec and Duffy argue that modern conservatism has lost its traditional roots, becoming diluted and lacking a clear ideological foundation.
Notable Quotes:
"What role do we want to actually have in society? Are we just anti trans, but we're supporting all of the other, like, liberal stuff..."
— Jack Posobiec [35:00]
"The way conservatism is evolving every day... it's not a winning game."
— Evita Duffy [36:13]
Duffy suggests that true conservatism should align more closely with traditional values and religious principles, criticizing the current state of the Republican Party for losing its ideological direction.
Posobiec warns about the dangers of left-wing populism, citing figures like Luigi Mangione and Hasan Piker as examples of the violent and chaotic tendencies within the Democratic base.
Notable Quotes:
"Luigi Mangione is exactly why I'm terrified of the left. And I hope that regular Democrats continue to keep their party in line for the sake of us all."
— Evita Duffy [38:08]
"People are upset, people are resentful... it's the same resentment that we saw last night."
— Jack Posobiec [37:24]
This segment emphasizes the belief that internal conflicts and radical elements within the Democratic Party pose a significant threat to societal stability.
In the closing segments, Posobiec and his guests reiterate their concerns about the direction of both major political parties and advocate for a return to traditional conservative values. They encourage listeners to engage with media outlets that align with their viewpoints and remain vigilant against what they perceive as leftist overreach.
Notable Quote:
"All politics is friend, foe, distinction. [...] that's what their politics truly is."
— Jack Posobiec [19:46]
Evita Duffy also highlights the importance of maintaining moral standards and resisting the dilution of conservative principles to accommodate modern societal changes.
This episode of Human Events Daily presents a critical view of the Democratic Party's response to President Trump's address, framing it as anti-human and driven by resentment. The discussion extends to broader concerns about media bias, judicial decisions, and the evolving nature of conservatism. Through detailed analysis and pointed quotes, Posobiec and his guests advocate for a steadfast adherence to traditional conservative values amidst what they perceive as escalating liberal aggression.
Follow Us:
Note: This summary captures the key discussions and viewpoints presented in the episode. It is intended to provide an accurate and comprehensive overview for those who have not listened to the original podcast.