Loading summary
Angie
Why have we asked our contractor we found on Angie.com to be our kid's legal guardian? Because he took such good care when redoing our basement that we knew we could trust him to care for our kids.
Angie.com Advertiser
We only met a month ago, Angie, the one you trust to find the ones you trust. Find pros for all your home projects@angie.com.
Angie
All right.
Political Commentator
The Trump regime has ice and they want to fund it more. They are buying warehouses that they are going to turn into concentration camps. And the Democrats in power keep playing patty cake with this administration. And you have what I believe are fascist collaborators in the upper tier echelon of the Democratic Party because the resistance is so obvious and it is so such a moderate position to abolish ice, yet Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer continue to play patty cake with fascists. And when you go to court, here's what happens. Put this up. According to Reuters, courts have ruled 4,400 times that ice jailed people illegally. And it hasn't stopped. ICE is still continuing. So we have three branches of government. We have the executive branch, who wants full blown ice. I believe they are going to use ICE as a voter suppression tactic and scare force on election day. And then you have the legislative branch, which the Democratic Party in the legislative branch has all but just given Trump a green light to continue with this insanity.
Angie
Here's the thing. We see court rulings against ICE and against the Trump administration, like in droves. They do what they want anyway. They do not give a shit about breaking the law. There is no checks and balances because they're willing to break the law to do what? Whatever the fuck they want.
Political Commentator
Okay? And then here's Chuck Schumer on cnn. And if you notice, Chuck Schumer typically does like corporate media. Here he is, and I cannot believe he said this. He thinks Republicans are going to appeal to their common sense as it pertains to ice. Pop this up.
Political Analyst
So your fellow Democratic Senator, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who voted against shutting down the government, he pointed out that, quote, this shutdown literally has zero impact on ICE functionality. Democracy demands a way forward to reform ICE without damaging our critical national security agencies, unquote. And it is true that CBP and ICE are fully funded this year, and you're using the funding of other parts of dhs, such as the Coast Guard or tsa, as leverage. And in the meantime, ICE can keep doing whatever it wants to do. So the question would be, how does the shutdown do anything to accomplish the goal of Reining in Trump's immigration crackdown if ICE and CBP are not necessarily directly affected.
Angie.com Advertiser
Well, two points. First, we have proposed that the guardrails that will be applied to ICE are applied not just to the present funding, but to the previous funding that was in the big bad bill. That's very important to us. So that will rein in all of the ICE agents, no matter where they're funded. But second, there's a simple answer to this. Republicans go along with this common sense, these common sense proposals and we'll fund the whole DHS bill, the whole Department of Homeland Security bill, just go along. Again, I cannot repeat enough. These are common sense. Police departments across America use them. We have a rogue agency. Why don't we rein them in? That's what the American people are asking Republicans. And that's why they're gonna have to go along with us. And I believe, you know, I believe they'll have no choice but to go along with us. Cuz it's so common sense and so much supported by the American people. They're losing support every day by not supporting these common sense proposals you talked about.
Political Commentator
Okay, this is what we've been talking about. When Trump first won, Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer were not on my radar. I just assumed it was going to be a full blown resistance. And when there was all of this assuaging and capitulation and coddling, I just, that's when my own political evolution, I started thinking, why? Why are they going along with this? It wasn't that huge of a victory. It's not like this man has a shit ton of political capital. And furthermore, he campaigned on having a goon squad like this and everybody out of Trump 1.0. All of these neocons came out of that administration and said, this guy is a Nazi. He's a fascist through and through. He wants generals like Hitler. So why we know all of this stuff as fact and then we say Republicans are going to be, they're going to go along with common sense. There is nothing common sense about the Republican Party. Nothing. That is the fool's errand in his statement. And so then we're all out here as Democrats, as independents, as Americans saying, okay, where's the resistance? And time and time and time again, Chuck Schumer proves to be a fascist collaborator, Period. There is no other explanation for it. He is not the man of the moment. I think he needs to resign his leadership position. I think he needs to resign from the Senate. That's how dire this is. But Chuck Schumer is never going to be affected by the stuff that other people are affected by. He's so incredibly out of touch with the base of his party and the American people.
Angie
And I just look at this like, if the Republicans were going to have common sense, wouldn't they have done it? Alligator, Alcatraz, you know, the billion dollar jet from Qatar bombing, people raining in, the tariffs, all the things they're doing. If they were going to have common sense, it would have been long before now. So that, to me that just seems like bullshit. That just, that means nothing.
Political Commentator
The Republican Party, when all chips in on a convicted felon as their nominee. So we have to just stop right there. Everything that happens after that is just what criminals do. He's a mob boss. And so to have this expectation that his colleagues in the Senate and his colleagues in the House are somehow going to be overcome with common sense when they voted for, endorsed and provide oxygen for a convicted felon, everything under that is just crime. They elected a criminal. And then we have to have a party that is the resistance. We need to have a full stop resistance. And all of this playing patty cake with them makes them full blown fascist collaborators. Now I can sit here and focus on, okay, Trump did this, this, this, this, this rinse and repeat every day. It is going to be crimes, hypocritical actions. They're going to keep out crazing themselves, they're going to keep out crueling themselves and it's going to get worse and worse. So my focus right now is the people who have power that can resist this. What are they doing? They're not listening to the base of the party because put up this chart, Seth. Okay, AOC has numbers with young Democrats. Plus 81 is comically popular. So Chuck Schumer is at minus 18. Hakeem Jeffers is it. Jeffries is at plus 6. AOC is at plus 81. This is a non corporate taking, non apac economic populist Hispanic woman and she is at plus 81. The two people that we're counting on to do something here for us, Chuck is minus. He's so underwater. And Hakeem is single digits popularity. And this disconnect, this disjointed resistance, I don't like disliking Chuck Schumer. I don't like disliking Hakeem Jeffries. But when Kamala lost and Trump won and I started looking at the Democrats to put up a fight and time and time again they have not arrived at that moment. So then you start looking at, oh, the same PACs that fund Trump also fund these people. Oh, they're paid controlled opposition and they're governing as such. The outrage. I have zero expectation that MAGA isn't going to this next news cycle completely outdo themselves in moral depravity. I know that will happen. I want to focus on who is sane and it's not Chuck Schumer because for him to sit there and talk about common sense and not look at all of these polls, poll after poll after poll after poll. People want the Democrats to fight. Pop up this next one. So CBS percentage of people describing each party as weak. 70% say the Democratic Party is weak, extreme. Only 45% and 64% think the Republican Party is extreme. So for those of you that get caught up in this, we need to move to the center. We need to move to the center. All of this. Republicans, they think that the Democratic Party under Kamala Harris, under Barack Obama was extreme. But the electorate at large, only 45% where clearly the Republican Party is the extremist. And this is a narrative where the Democrats allow the Republicans to define them reasonable. 43% think the Democrats are reasonable. Only 29% think they're Republican. This is a dagger effective Democratic Party, only 16%. And this, this poll is among independents, I'm sorry, independents. And then 14% of independent voters think they're strong. So keep this up for just a second, Seth. If they're going after independence, if that's what it is, swinging to the center is not going to work. They want people that are strong, not we. They believe that the Democratic Party. I'm sorry, they believe that the Republican Party is far more extreme than the Democratic Party. And this is what makes me insane. The polling, the support within the Democratic Party for candidates taking AIPAC is at an all time low. Democratic approval ratings at an all time low. The populist candidates are at an all time high. Yet we have Tweedledee and tweedledipshit in the Senate minority in the House leading us and leading this resistance. And I'm always just so disappointed because I want the Democratic Party to succeed. I want the. I believe that it is the best party to fight for working class Americans. I believe you can look at the stats from blue states and red states and see how much better it is. But it's not good enough. It's not good enough and it leaves a void in a vacuum for all of this fascism to flourish.
Angie
Here's the thing. I suspect if you polled Democrats regarding effectiveness and strength you would probably get the same numbers, because we can, we can put lipstick on a pig all day long. The Democratic leadership right now is not fighting, period. They're not doing enough. They're not urgent enough, they are not strong enough, and they are not fighting. One hand, they'll say, oh, you know, we're fighting for democracy. The next thing is, oh, we want bipartisan. They're, they're just not getting it.
Political Commentator
It.
Angie
So I'm not surprised by this. I suspect within the Democratic Party, it would be the exact same numbers.
Political Commentator
All right. That's all we have. Please, like, subscribe, comment, and we'll be back later with more news.
Hosts: Jennifer Welch & Angie “Pumps” Sullivan
Date: February 16, 2026
In this episode, Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan dive into the current political climate under the second Trump administration, focusing on the Democratic Party’s leadership response – or lack thereof – to Trump’s immigration crackdown and broader authoritarian trends. With their trademark candid, comedic style, the hosts scrutinize top Democrats, especially Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, questioning their will and effectiveness as leaders of the “resistance.” Throughout, they highlight Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (AOC) soaring popularity among young Democrats and the party base as a sharp contrast to the establishment’s stagnation and perceived collaboration with the GOP.
Blunt, irreverent, and deeply dissatisfied, this episode captures progressive disillusionment with Democratic leaders perceived as timid or complicit in the face of resurgent Trumpism. AOC is held up as an example of what resonates with party voters, while Schumer and Jeffries are lambasted for their timidity. The hosts urge the party to recognize the demand for real resistance and strength—not more centrist compromise—to confront the ongoing threats to democracy.