Podcast Host (5:53)

So we know that, like Zuckerberg Musk bent the knee to Trump. I mean, that's widely documented. So do we know if the owners of Reddit are they knee benders to fascism?

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (6:04)

You know, Reddit's an interesting case in comparison to some of these other tech companies. You have groups like the Electronic Frontier foundation, which tracks sort of privacy protections in the context of these big social media companies. In, in general, Reddit has scored fairly high on, on their rankings in terms of protecting privacy. Reddit certainly makes a big deal of their privacy protection policies. We don't much to take them at their word because a lot of this happens behind the scenes. But outwardly they very much sort of project the image of a company that does a lot to protect its data. In the course of reporting this story, Reddit directed me to some transparency reports that they published in the past year that really includes some very interesting data about the moment that we're in right now. So the past year, the first six months of last year, Reddit recorded more requests from law enforcement, these sorts of administrative subpoenas, grand jury subpoenas, that sort of thing, than they've ever received at any other point prior to their reporting. Now, they don't disaggregate that data to tell us which law enforcement agencies specifically are requesting data, but it is US Law enforcement agencies that are making the most requests. And a lot of those requests are coming from federal law enforcement. A lot of them are coming out of D.C. and so it is a strong indication that these companies, Reddit in particular, but, but also Meta and Axe, are receiving a lot of requests on accounts. And, you know, requests for data are not unusual for these companies from federal law enforcement. Normally, you know, Reddit will get a number of requests for child endangerment type of cases. But what's different in this moment is a ton of requests from the government about anonymous counts that appear critical of the administration's immigration enforcement regime.

Podcast Host (8:04)

Yeah. And it makes you wonder. Remember all the don't tread on me flags at the January 6, the don't tread on me people?

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (8:10)

Yeah.

Podcast Host (8:11)

And here we have a clear, you know, attack on free speech. There is this, I've read about this. I think it's N. SP17 or something like this.

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (8:21)

That's right.

Podcast Host (8:22)

National Security memo where they are wanting to get files on people probably like me or like you or these Reddit users and label us. It's a pre crime labeling. They're labeling people with a pre crime. Do you see any link between that NSP 17 and these requests coming out of Washington in This pre crime era, that doj, Trump, Stephen Miller, they're wanting to. It goes back to what the President ran on, which is the enemy from within. Any reporting that this is all linked in that umbrella of this regime.

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (9:04)

Yeah, so NSPM7 was a national security sort of memo that went out to all of the, you know, the sort of ecosystem of federal law enforcement agencies sort of outlining what the administration's law enforcement priorities and agenda are. And as you indicated, it's, you know, folks can look it up. There's a whole list of sort of criteria that the administration is asking to ordering its agents to be on the lookout for. A lot of this stuff has to do with being, you know, critical of immigration policies. You know, anything that threatens sort of traditional. And this is not my sort of description of what this is not. It's not, my interpretation is literally what it says. It's, you know, sort of anyone that's critical of traditional American values, sort of Christian, traditional American values, critical of immigration enforcement. That's the sort of broad umbrella that the administration has tasked its federal law enforcement agencies to be sort of targeting and zeroing in on and paying attention to. So I think what we've seen, and this is pretty clear at this point is obviously the administration's immigration agenda is quite unpopular politically right now. In addition to a really intense crackdown on undocumented documented people themselves, the administration has widened the aperture to include critics of its policies. We saw this, you know, playing out obviously very dramatically in Minneapolis, where I was earlier this year. And I think that these cases like we're discussing here in this instance, of a Reddit user being targeted with administrative subpoena, and then the government sort of getting that batted down and turning around and filing a sort of order that a major, one of the largest, you know, tech companies around to appear before a grand jury in Washington, D.C. is part of the same sort of project. I very much believe that the kind of Miller agenda that lumps immigration in with cracking down on the left are intimately intertwined.

Podcast Host (11:17)

Yeah, I do, too. You know, they call him, his nickname in the White House is Mr. Prime Minister. And I don't think that this is my opinion. I think that whether it's Kristi Noem or Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, they're just a puppet. I think Stephen Miller runs dhs. He's the one who puts the pressure on the people in Minneapolis to be aggressive with protesters. So let me ask you this. I think one of the biggest American things. It's a shit talk. I have a Podcast called I've had it because I Like to talk. Right. So I think a lot of Americans like to talk. The President likes to talk. Look at his, his social media feed. It's ridiculous. He's the biggest talker on the planet. So you're telling me I can go on Reddit right now and I can be like, I sucks. I think Stephen Miller's a prick. I think what they did in Minneapolis is, I think they're behaving like fascist Nazis and then they're going to come after me via some secret grand jury for that. That's what's happening here to Americans. Shit talking on Reddit.

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (12:25)

Yeah. So a bit more context about this case in particular. Like I said, we don't know what triggered it for ice, but this person, who's identified in court records as John Doe, got legal counsel and they did a review of all of this person's posts, recent posts, and what they saw were some. They posted in a thread that shared an article, a news article that identified Jonathan Ross, who was the ICE officer who shot Renee Good in January in Minnesota. The comments from this poster in that account, which I report on in the piece, I include three different posts that are probably the spiciest of anything that the attorneys could find and even the most aggressive in that thread. So again, we don't know what the context or what the substance of this case that the feds are apparent apparently pursuing is. But yeah, your description of what the sort of ramifications could be if you're going on Reddit to talk seems accurate. It seems to be. What happened in this case.

Podcast Host (13:41)

You're saying he named the shoot. The, the ICE agent that shot Renee Good? He named.

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (13:49)

No, no, no. The, the, this subreddit had posted a news article from, from Minneapolis. The news article that broke the news of who Jonathan Ross was. And this was just people commenting on the news. The, the poster didn't share anything that wasn't already circulating widely in mainstream news accounts. They said, you know, that Jonathan Ross was, you know, lived in, lived in Minneapolis for a while, served in the National Guard. Their commentary was that they would like. The Reddit users commentary was that they would like to see Ross in prison, that there was no sort of disclosing new information that wasn't already out there, protected.

Podcast Host (14:33)

All of this was protected speech. Right. Okay, so civil liberties lawyers say they can't find anything remotely criminal in this user's post. What do you think the government's actually trying to accomplish here with Reddit? Do, do. I mean, I, for Me, and this is just me deducing I'm not an investigative journalist like you are. To me, the work you do is the gold standard. I am an online commentator slash shit talker. For me, it seems like a layup that Trump could call Zuck or Musk and be like, hey, we want this shit. And you know, Elon Musk, I mean, high on ketamine is gonna be like, yeah, sure, here's all the DMs, whatever you want, buddy. But any, do you know of any link that Reddit is something they're trying to get their hands on? Do you think that this is more like we need to get control of Reddit because Reddit hasn't bent the knee? Or do you think this is, is more we're sending out a flare to like when they arrested Don Lemon. They're trying to send out a flare to people like me. What, what is your take through your investigation on this? What do you think the message that the Miller, Stephen Miller's, because we know Trump doesn't give a, about any of this stuff. He's laser focused on his ballroom. So what do you, what do you think they're, what message do you think they're trying to send here?

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (15:50)

You know, there's a lot of, you know, we're doing a lot of speculating here because obviously it's the grand jury, it's super secret. We, you know, that's, that's the nature of a grand jury. We don't know what the substance of this investigation is. But I think that it is fair to conclude that this is an indication that the administration and federal law enforcement under this administration is taking this doxing of federal law enforcement epidemic, as they describe it, really seriously. They're going beyond the administrative subpoenas which an agent, ICE, can whip up pretty quick. They don't need a judge's approval to request this data. They're seeing pushback in federal courts, as they did in Northern District of California. They're seeing some of these knocked down. So instead of being backing away from this project of going after these accountants, they're taking it to the next level. And they've convened a grand jury and they're seeking evidence and they're hauling the companies themselves in and asking them to turn over data. And that's a pretty significant turn. We'll have to wait and see, you know, whether an indictment comes down out of this grand jury or not. You know, but the fact of a federal grand jury in this kind of case is significant for, you know, listeners who Might not know. A grand jury is not like you hear jury, and you're thinking an adversarial kind of trial, a defense attorney making arguments. That's not what a grand jury is. A grand jury exists for the purpose of allowing a prosecutor to present evidence in order to bring charges. Everything is under seal. So all of this is happening behind closed doors right now. We're going to have to wait and see to see whether or not something comes, comes out of it. But, yeah, I think that this is a strong indication that the administration is, you know, it's taking this whole doxing thing very, very seriously. They're committing resources to it and they're assigning agents to it. And obviously agents are going around and they're looking for stuff that they can request data on. Like, like I said, Reddit has received a ton of these type of requests over the past year. And it's not just Reddit. X has two, meta has two. They're. They are making a concerted effort to find people who are behind these accounts,

Podcast Host (18:16)

which is really rich because, I mean, nobody is a bigger doxer than Donald Trump when he had all of these, you know, cases against him, lawsuits against him. He's doxing judges, judges, kids. I mean, just absolutely horrible. I just want to point out that everything with this administration, it seems like, is a shakedown. They, when they started, they had to shake down the law firms, and then they're shaking down universities, now they're shaking down tech agencies. And all of this is immediate means to curtail criticism. I will say something hopeful for my listeners is that sometimes, a lot of times, federal courts have been really strong resistance in Trump 2.0, and grand jurors have been really strong resistance. You may remember, Ryan, the Trump regime tried to convene a grand jury against sitting members of Congress and the Senate that wanted to, that told people in the military, do not disobey illegal orders. And they tried to indict John Kelly, et cetera. And the grand jury, which would indict a ham sandwich was a everyday American standing up as resistance. So that's why I just want to say to you and to the listener, these stories and the journalism that you do is so important in the world of podcasting. And I'm a podcaster, I always say the gold standard is journalism to shine a light, to disinfect wrongs and to right wrongs. So thank you so much. Do you have any closing thoughts for our listeners as we continue through, you know, this with the Trump regime?

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (19:58)

Well, just, you know, I was just sort of thinking as you're commenting there about the level of resistance that we're seeing in the United States right now. And I spent a good chunk of the beginning of this year in Minneapolis and saw what that looked like there in Minnesota. And I think that it sort of as unprecedented as the moment feels in terms of the crackdown, I think that there is a sort of nearly unprecedented level of resistance out there, and I think we can expect that to continue as the administration's efforts roll on.

Podcast Host (20:34)

I agree with you. Ryan Devereaux, thank you so much for what you're doing and listener, please go read his article at the Intercept and support journalists. The most important part of our democracy right now is journalism. Thank you so much.

Ryan Devereaux, Investigative Journalist (20:49)

Thanks so much for having me.

Progressive Insurance Announcer (21:01)

Insurance isn't one size fits all. That's why customers have enjoyed Progressives name your price tool for years now. With the name your price tool, you tell them what you want to pay and they'll show you options that fit your budget. So whether you're picking out your first policy or just looking for something that works better for you and your family, they make it easy to see your options. Visit progressive.com find a rate that works for you with the name your price tool. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates Price and coverage match limited by state law.