Transcript
A (0:01)
Hi, everybody. Tune in to this short version of the podcast, which we do every Friday. For the long version, tune in on Wednesdays. Hi, everybody. I'm Nicolai Tangen of the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund. And today we are hosting an investor legend, Paul Singer, who founded Elliot Asset Management and probably the most important activist investor in the world. Paul, warm welcome.
B (0:26)
Thank you.
A (0:27)
What is activist investing?
B (0:29)
Activist investing is taking a position largely in an equity security of a company and trying to engage with the company to improve outcomes, control or influence outcomes, better outcomes to unlock value. It could be management changes that are requested. It could be capital structure changes, finance strategies and tactics, anything that will make the company earn more money, be better positioned more, rationally, deploy assets.
A (1:06)
Why do you have to do this? Don't companies do this themselves?
B (1:09)
Well, as you know, the trend away from active investing. And by active investing, I don't necessarily mean activist. Active investing just means you open the mail from the company in which you invest, you try to figure it out, you try to understand the company's strategy, and maybe you'll call the company up and lob in some suggestions. But active investing is next to passive investing or index investing. Index investing now accounts for a plurality of money that's managed, particularly equity money, around the world.
A (1:50)
What's the ratio of successful outcomes versus not so successful outcomes?
B (1:55)
Well, since I'm going to define successful as we get a meaningful percentage of what we ask for and the stock reflects it, not just in 20 minutes, but I mean over a period of time that our ideas actually add value. It's the only way we can maintain our reputation that gets the stock to say, oh, Elliot's in this. Here's their thesis. Nobody else has been able to unlock that key. The stock is worth more. And of course, it's not a question of short termism, because actual short termism doesn't add value to anyone really. But it's not short termism. When the market instantly, overnight or in a couple of days or a few days understands that you are adding long term value, you're adding enterprise value, the strategy is better, your ability to compete is better.
A (2:56)
And in what proportion of the cases do you think you are adding value if you measure it in that way?
