This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we focus on an issue that has been quietly reshaping the patent industry for years but has gained new momentum over the last year or two.

Patent budgets are shrinking, expectations are rising, and nobody seems willing to admit what that combination actually means.

Companies continue to say that patents remain essential to protecting innovation and supporting long-term business strategy. But if priorities are truly reflected in budgets, the message coming from corporate patent spending tells a different story.

Rather than confronting this tension directly, many organizations are trying to solve the problem by asking outside counsel to deliver more for less. They want stronger patents, deeper technical disclosures, broader claim support, and prosecution strategies designed to withstand litigation scrutiny—all while expecting preparation and prosecution costs to remain flat or even decline.

Layered on top of these pressures is a growing assumption that artificial intelligence should dramatically reduce the cost of patent work. And while AI can significantly enhance quality the productivity gains many expected from AI have not yet materialized.

So, this week we discuss whether client actions suggest patents still matter.

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.

You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

Patents Don't Matter: The Real Story Shrinking Budgets Tell About the Patent System