Podcast Summary: "Panama 1989 to Venezuela 2026: What History Can Teach Us feat. Andrew"
Podcast: It Could Happen Here (Cool Zone Media & iHeartPodcasts)
Date: February 3, 2026
Hosts: Andrew Sage, James Stout
Episode Overview
This episode examines the long, fraught history of U.S. intervention in Panama as a lens to understand and contextualize the recent, fictionalized U.S. invasion of Venezuela (2026)—drawing powerful parallels between the two events. Andrew Sage and James Stout break down Panama’s colonial and post-colonial history, the construction of the Panama Canal, the manipulation of Panamanian politics by American interests, and the consequences for both regional geopolitics and local populations. The episode sets up the next part on the infamous 1989 U.S. invasion and ties the legacy of U.S. interventions in Latin America to modern-day crises.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. The 2026 U.S. Invasion of Venezuela (00:41)
- Andrew Sage frames the episode by referencing the (fictional) New Year's U.S. invasion of Venezuela, the kidnapping of Maduro, and a mounting death toll.
- Quote: "Many have been drawn attention to the similarities between this recent historical moment and another notorious US invasion of a nearby Latin American country, Panama, back in 1989." (01:14)
2. Panama's Geography and Strategic Significance (03:07)
- The hosts provide an overview of Panama: a pivotal country connecting Central and South America, most famous for its world-changing canal.
- The difficulty of traversing the Darien Gap—a nearly impassable jungle region—underscored Panama's historic isolation from Colombia and U.S. interest in controlling access.
- James Stout: Describes a harrowing modern journey through the Darien Gap, underscoring both the challenges and the desperation of today's migrants.
- Quote: "You’re shimming along cliff edges on, you know, a few inches of rock and if you fall, you will die... Someone gave birth in the jungle while I was there." (06:00)
- James Stout: Describes a harrowing modern journey through the Darien Gap, underscoring both the challenges and the desperation of today's migrants.
3. U.S. Involvement in Panama's Independence (07:00–11:02)
- Panama's independence was orchestrated by U.S. and local elites eager to build a canal; Panama’s geographic and political isolation facilitated U.S. manipulation.
- The U.S. conducted 11 interventions in pre-independence Panama, often citing "protection of American interests" and deploying heavily racialized rhetoric and policy.
- Andrew Sage: "They saw the Colombian army as ignorant mongrels, and they saw the Panama Isthmus civilians as savage and animal like." (08:44)
4. The Canal as an Imperial Motive (14:21–16:41)
- The Panama Canal project was driven by both mercantile/geostrategic reasons and racialized logic: to allow U.S. commerce and military reach without requiring Americans to “mingle” with local populations.
- Quote: "You have to get a canal so the whites don’t have to step foot off their boats and mingle with the locals..." (16:26)
5. U.S. Military Interventions and Political Manipulation (16:41–29:17)
- The U.S. repeatedly intervened in Panamanian civil conflicts, effectively ensuring the defeat of peasant/liberal uprisings and cementing the power of conservative, U.S.-aligned elites.
- Describes the process of canal negotiations: U.S. blockades, coerced treaties (notably the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty), and outright manipulation of Panamanian sovereignty.
- Andrew Sage: "The US did basically the complete opposite. You know, that’s what makes them such an excellent partner on the global stage. You can always count on them to uphold the highest standards of moral and diplomatic decency." (20:13)
Notable Moment:
- The hosts detail how the U.S. was given—and used at will—the right to seize land for “canal defense,” turning the Canal Zone into de facto U.S. territory with almost no recourse for Panamanians.
6. Building the Canal: Racism and Labor Exploitation (23:34–27:04)
- The canal was built atop a brutally exploitative labor structure; Caribbean workers (mostly Black) were forced into more dangerous, more poorly paid jobs through the “gold roll/silver roll” racial hierarchy.
- James Stout: Remembers powerful museum exhibits in Panama:
- Quote: "They had accounts from the workers...the things that they were fed, the shitty shoes that they got given, pictures of the...sleeping situations..." (24:08)
- 5,600 deaths (mainly among Black Caribbean laborers) during U.S. construction alone are cited.
- James Stout: Remembers powerful museum exhibits in Panama:
7. Panama as an American "Imperial Laboratory" (27:17–33:46)
- The U.S. treated Panama as a testing ground for military strategy, chemical and nuclear testing, and political experimentation.
- Explains proposals to nuke the Darien to build a new canal; recounts analogous disasters like U.S. nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands.
- James Stout: "Yeah. They completely failed to account for even prevailing winds...People still have one of the highest rates of stillbirth in the world." (33:39)
- Explains proposals to nuke the Darien to build a new canal; recounts analogous disasters like U.S. nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands.
Notable Insight:
- Panama's 20th-century governance and resistance movements were continually suppressed or subverted by U.S. intervention, shaping the country's entire political trajectory.
8. Panamanian Nationalism and 1964 Flag Riots (36:07–36:52)
-
A student protest over the display of Panama’s flag (and a U.S. response that tore it) erupts into a riot, resulting in dozens killed and catalyzing a new wave of Panamanian nationalism.
- James Stout: Notes seeing the torn Panamanian flag in a museum:
- Quote: "That Panamanian flag is in the museum...It's a pivotal, like, artifact of their national History." (36:12)
- James Stout: Notes seeing the torn Panamanian flag in a museum:
-
This and ongoing tensions led to demands for renegotiating the canal treaties, increased assertion of national sovereignty, and, eventually, the slow winding down of U.S. overt military manipulation.
9. Setting Up Part Two: Handover, Reaction, and the Upcoming Discussion of 1989 (40:39)
- The episode ends with a tease for next time, promising to connect this deep history to the infamous 1989 U.S. invasion of Panama and then tie it forward to Venezuela.
- Andrew Sage: "If you want to know what will happen with the treaty, with Panama's political future, and how all of this does or does not relate to current conditions in Venezuela...stay tuned for the next episode." (40:39)
Notable Quotes & Timestamps
-
James Stout on the Darien Gap migration crisis:
“You’re shimming along cliff edges on, you know, a few inches of rock and if you fall, you will die...Someone gave birth in the jungle while I was there. It’s unimaginable. And like, people die every day...but people take it because they want a better chance at life.” (06:00) -
Andrew Sage on U.S. conduct:
“The US did basically the complete opposite. You know, that’s what makes them such an excellent partner on the global stage. You can always count on them to uphold the highest standards of moral and diplomatic decency.” (20:13) -
James Stout on nuclear testing impact:
“People have attempted to go back to their island because at one point they were told that they could and they absolutely, like, it wasn't safe for them. But like the. The coconuts and the crabs and the fish and the reefs are still irradiated. They're still not safe for them. People still have one of the highest rates of stillbirth in the world.” (33:39) -
James Stout recalling the Panamanian flag:
“That Panamanian flag is in the museum. The Panama Canal Museum...It's a pivotal, like, artifact of their national History.” (36:12) -
Andrew Sage closing:
"If you want to know what will happen with the treaty, with Panama's political future, and how all of this does or does not relate to current conditions in Venezuela...stay tuned for the next episode." (40:39)
Key Timestamps by Segment
- 00:41 — Summary of fictional 2026 U.S. invasion of Venezuela
- 03:07 — Panama's geography, Darien Gap, and canal history introduction
- 08:03 — Overview of U.S. interventions in Panama pre-independence
- 14:21–16:41 — Racial and imperial logics behind the canal
- 16:41–20:13 — U.S. manipulation of Panama’s independence and first U.S.-Panamanian treaty
- 23:34–27:04 — Racist labor structure of canal construction, deaths of laborers
- 27:17–33:46 — Panama as "imperial laboratory," U.S. chemical/nuclear testing, regional launchpad
- 36:07–36:52 — 1964 flag riots and their aftermath
- 40:39 — End of episode; teaser for next discussion
Tone & Style
The hosts employ a mix of meticulously researched historical narrative, vivid personal anecdotes, biting sarcasm about U.S. imperial policy, and empathetic storytelling—maintaining both a critical and conversational tone. Their language is accessible but unflinching, naming violence, racism, and hypocrisy explicitly.
Summary for New Listeners
This episode contextualizes America's intervention in Panama—the exploitation, violence, and manipulation that shaped modern Panama—to ask what lessons history holds for understanding its contemporary actions in Latin America, particularly Venezuela. By charting a timeline from 19th-century intrigue to 20th-century protest, the hosts illuminate how imperial interests, racism, and Cold War politics layered lasting wounds on the region.
For anyone unfamiliar, this is an essential listen to grasp why U.S. interventions echo into today's crises—and why understanding Panama is crucial to understanding Venezuela and beyond.
