The War on Iran and Convergences of Fascism

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: It Could Happen Here

Episode: The War on Iran and Convergences of Fascism
Date: June 4, 2026
Host: Dana El Kurd
Guest: Dr. Nagar Razavi (Princeton University)

---

Overview

This episode dives deep into the current situation in Iran following recent warfare, focusing on humanitarian impacts, the regime’s crackdowns, and the larger geopolitical forces and ideologies enabling and emerging from the conflict. Host Dana El Kurd interviews Dr. Nagar Razavi, a political anthropologist whose expertise in think tanks and US security policy provides essential context. Together, they examine not only what is happening on the ground in Iran, but also the convergences of fascist currents making such a war possible, and the dangers of unchecked narratives in policymaking.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Situation on the Ground in Iran

[03:00 - 06:04]

• Humanitarian Crisis:
  • Ordinary Iranians are experiencing unprecedented hardship:
    • “It is very bad on the ground for ordinary Iranians on all fronts. Economically, it is very dire at the moment. Inflation is now at unbelievably high rates.” (Dr. Razavi, 03:22)
    • Destruction of infrastructure (hospitals, factories, desalination plants) led to massive unemployment.
    • Prolonged Internet shutdown—the “longest in Iran’s history”—has further crippled labor and communications.
    • 1,700 civilian deaths, 3.5 million displaced, and widespread terror due to ongoing threats of renewed bombing.
  • Escalating repression:
    • The government exploits wartime conditions to execute alleged traitors at “unbelievable rates.”
    • Total clampdown and surveillance far exceeding prior crackdowns.

2. The Regime’s Wartime Strategy

[06:04 - 10:13]

• Uptick in Repression:

  • The war offers the Iranian regime pretext to intensify crackdowns and suppress dissent, reaching levels not seen since the 1980s.
  • Replacement of leadership after targeted killings by US/Israeli strikes has led to even more hardline figures and policies.
  • “[T]hey can use warfare as the grounds to essentially go even further in their oppression. And that’s what a lot of human rights activists and people on the ground are worried about.” (Dr. Razavi, 07:45)

• Popular Mobilization and Propaganda:

  • Government leverages cultural symbols (university placements, martyr narratives) and orchestrates pro-government rallies, sometimes using unorthodox imagery (e.g., women without hijab).
  • “They're also playing this interesting imaging game where they want to also show, look, we can also be open and inclusive at the same time that they're executing people at the highest rate since the 1980s.” (Dr. Razavi, 09:29)

• Nationalism and New Alliances:

  • Ironically, the war has triggered nationalist sentiment—even former protestors now support the government out of a sense of defending sovereignty.

3. Convergences of Fascism Enabling the War

[14:16 - 19:43]

• Summary of Dr. Razavi’s Conference Argument:

  • Several fascist strands have converged to enable the war:

    1. Anti-Muslim Sentiment / Islamophobia:
       Crosses global far-right movements (US, Israel, Europe, India). Particular focus on anti-Shia and anti-Iran narratives since the 1979 revolution.
    2. White Supremacy & Aryanism:
       Far-right Iranian and diaspora factions (e.g., aligned with former Shah’s family) invoke “Aryan” identity and anti-Arab, anti-Palestinian sentiment—sometimes aligning with Israeli aims.
    3. Settler Colonialism & Nativism:
       Draws parallels between US/Israeli settler policies and broader anti-immigrant, anti-minority movements.
    4. Nostalgic Paternalism:
       Idolization of authoritarian “strongman” figures (Trump, Sisi, Modi, Reza Pahlavi), exclusionary gender roles.
    5. Techno-Fascism:
       The rise of tech-dominated, anti-human, ‘dystopian’ policy approaches (referencing companies like Palantir).

  • “All of these strands come together at this very particular moment to justify and advance a war that some actors have wanted for a long time. And I say that it's kind of the blending of these at this particular moment that enabled this war.” (Dr. Razavi, 19:26)

4. Fascism, Islamophobia, and Anti-Palestinian Racism

[19:43 - 22:30]

• Interlocking Forms of Bigotry:

  • Anti-Palestinian racism is a root driver of Islamophobia in the US and shapes both internal Iranian opposition and external alliances.
  • The Iranian regime’s championing of the Palestinian cause (for both strategic and propaganda purposes) has, paradoxically, bred anti-Palestinian resentment among some Iranians and diaspora groups.
  • “Anti-Palestinian racism is central to how the opposition in Iran views itself... this feeds back into the Islamophobia, this idea that we have nothing in common with the Palestinians because they are part of a religion that has also oppressed us... it's this feedback loop that's pretty horrible.” (Dr. Razavi, 21:17)

• Shifting Solidarity:

  • Dr. Razavi notes a “slightly hopeful” trend: the war has prompted some Iranians to connect their own suffering to the Palestinian struggle, fostering new grounds for solidarity.

5. The Role of Think Tanks in Shaping US Policy

[23:31 - 29:58]

• The Transnational Think Tank System:

  • Dr. Razavi’s research and forthcoming book (“The Geopolitics of Expertise”) highlight how US-based think tanks are co-constructed by foreign states (Arab Gulf countries, Turkey, Morocco, Israel), not just American policymakers.
  • “They are co-constructing the imperial imagination. And this is one of the key findings.” (Dr. Razavi, 24:50)
  • With Iran specifically, these actors want Iran to remain an “unknowable enemy” to justify ongoing antagonism and military buildup.

• Perverse Interests and “Winners”:

  • Certain industries (oil, weapons, private equity, AI) profit from the war and shortages, even as the overall regional and global cost is catastrophic.
  • “Weapons manufacturers are doing really well right now… but the damages... is going to have very long term detrimental effects for all of these same industries, paradoxically. But in the short term, they're winning. Meanwhile, everybody else is losing.” (Dr. Razavi, 27:46)

6. Media Literacy & Policy Narratives

[29:58 - 32:05]

• Critical Consumption of Expertise:
  • Dr. Razavi urges listeners to:
    • Scrutinize the credentials and histories of so-called “Iran experts” featured in Western media.
    • Recognize how many had direct roles in promoting narratives that led to war, yet are now “disavowing” it and being invited to provide solutions.
  • “Be much more critical about who is analyzing Iran in such a moment. Look at who they work for. Look at what types of analysis they've done in the past.” (Dr. Razavi, 30:01)

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the dire state in Iran:

  • “People's quality of life right now inside Iran is pretty bad. And then you layer onto that a now even more repressive government that has been executing people they accuse of being traitors at unbelievable rates.” (Dr. Razavi, 05:41)

• On government propaganda and mobilization:

  • “They're also playing this interesting imaging game where they want to also show, look, we can also be open and inclusive at the same time that they're executing people at the highest rate since the 1980s.” (Dr. Razavi, 09:29)

• On the convergences of fascism:

  • “Several different strands of fascism have come together in this moment… this war was made possible in a sense, because several different strands of fascism have come together.” (Dr. Razavi, 14:36)

• On anti-Palestinian sentiment and shifting solidarities:

  • “I actually think the experience of this war has actually made more thoughtful Iranians see more of themselves now in the struggle of Palestinians.” (Dr. Razavi, 22:34)

• Advice on media literacy:

  • “It sometimes takes five extra minutes when you're reading a New York Times piece to just go through and highlight who they're quoting as experts... and just do five minutes of due diligence on who that piece is citing as an expert on Iran.” (Dr. Razavi, 30:14)

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• [03:00] State of humanitarian crisis in Iran
• [06:42] The Iranian regime leveraging war for further repression
• [09:12] Rise of nationalism and government propaganda tactics
• [14:36] Dr. Razavi outlines the convergences of fascism underlying the war
• [20:37] Exploring the links between Islamophobia, anti-Palestinian racism, and the Iranian context
• [23:31] How think tanks shape and sustain war narratives
• [29:58] The imperative to critically analyze “experts” in Western discourse on Iran

---

Conclusion & Final Takeaways

This episode offers a sobering, richly detailed look into not only the consequences of the war on Iran, but also the ideological and policy structures that enabled it. Dr. Razavi’s insights urge listeners to consider how fascism is both multi-faceted and transnational—and how expertise and narrative are constructed and weaponized in the halls of power. The central message: do not take media expertise at face value—be vigilant, inquisitive, and critical.

Dr. Razavi’s upcoming book, “The Geopolitics of Expertise,” will be published by Stanford University Press.

---

Transcript

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Dana El Kurd]

Guaranteed Human.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

This is George Taveras and Sam Taggart from Stradiolab. Let's be real Home comes with a lot of odors. Cooking, pets, everyday life. That's where Febreze comes in. Febreze helps fight household odors and leaves behind freshness that lasts. And with over 30 scents to choose from, you'll always find one that feels like you. Febreze freshness that fits your life, your space, your style. Febreze is a proud sponsor of the Elton John Impact Awards, honoring those who have helped shape a more inclusive and compassionate world with their artistry, advocacy and unwavering commitment to equality. You won't want to miss the Elton John Impact Awards podcast, available on June 1st on the iHeartRadio app. And everywhere podcasts are heard.

Number one hits. Millions of records sold awards sold out tours. You think the Jonas Brothers are satisfied?

[Dana El Kurd]

Nope.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

It's podcast time.

We get to ask other people questions

[Dana El Kurd]

because we're sick and tired of being asked questions.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

Hey Jonas is available now and their first guest is a big one, Paul Rudd.

You know Steve Carell is a great singer.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Didn't he tell you not to audition at the office or something?

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

I told whoa. We were filming Anchorman. Clearly I was the idiot. Thank God he didn't listen to me, right?

Listen to hey Jonas on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts this week at safeway.

And Albertsons. Six to 16 ounce selected varieties of strawberries, raspberries or blackberries are $1.99 each. Limit three member price with coupon and extra meaty pork back ribs or St. Louis style spareribs. Bone in previously frozen are $2.99 per pound limit four member price with coupon plus medium avocados, colored bell peppers or English cucumbers sold by the each or tomatoes on the vine or sweet onions sold by the pound are $0.99 member price. Visit safewayoralbertsons.com for more deals and ways to save now at Lowe's Faster Quotes start at the Lowe's Pro Desk. Got a material list handwritten on a sticky note or saved as a photo?

Perfect.

Bring it to us and get a quote in minutes. And if you don't see what you need on the shelf, we'll help you get it. You can access thousands of products beyond on what's available in store or on lowe's.com right from the Lowe's Pro Desk. Build quotes faster and source the materials you need to keep your jobs moving Just like that at Lowe's

[Dana El Kurd]

Cool Zone Media. Hello, everyone, and welcome to It Could Happen Here. My name is Dana El Kurd. I'm a researcher and analyst of Arab and Palestinian politics. And today I'm joined by Dr. Nagar Razavi. She is a political anthropologist at the I'm going to get this right. Mossavar Rahmani center for Iran and Persian Gulf Studies at Princeton University. And her work is on the role of think tanks in shaping US Security policies towards the Middle east and Iran specifically. And I've recently had the pleasure of being at a symposium with Dr. Rosavi and I thought she would be a really welcome viewpoint for our audience. Thank you for joining us.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Thanks so much for having me.

[Dana El Kurd]

So I think in regards to the war on Iran, there's been such a focus on the Strait of Hormuz and the economic impact of that that conditions on the ground have really slipped from our radars. Like, I don't see it as often and I think I'm a very well plugged in person. So can we start there? Can you tell us more about the situation and what it's like for like the average Iranian right now?

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yeah. Thank you so much for leading with that because I do think that is absolutely missing in not only mainstream media, but in much of the policy discussions that both of us follow closely. It's very bad on the ground for ordinary Iranians on all fronts. Economically, it is very dire at the moment. Inflation is now at unbelievably high rates. The level of damage that happened to the country, the physical damage, caused a lot of people to lose their jobs, if not their lives, because they hit hospitals, they hit schools, they hit factories. These are places where people work. So now all of those people are without a job. The cost of living again has skyrocketed. People who depended on the Internet somehow to do their work are also now out of a job because it's been the longest Internet shutdown in Iran's history at this point. So that's the economic aspect that implicates every single person inside Iran at the moment. And we're hearing that even people can't exchange the dollar. So things are really, really bad at this point. And then you add on the layer of the number of people who have been killed. By the latest count, I think I saw 1700 civilians have been killed. 3.5 million Iranians were displaced. And this was mainly people trying to escape major city centers. They went to areas that were very under resourced and so they were also suffering from lack of water. And electricity, wherever they were going, those people have now slowly been coming back to the major cities. Many more thousands of people were injured or maimed. And then, of course, the entire population has been terrorized by this war and the uncertainty of whether it's going to start again. I mean, the threats that Trump has given up until just a few hours ago was at any moment the bombings could start again. And then lastly, I want to say in terms of I touched on the infrastructure, but they hit desalination plants, they hit hospitals, they hit oil depots. People's quality of life right now inside Iran is pretty bad. And then you layer onto that a now even more repressive government that has been executing people they accuse of being traitors at unbelievable rates. A total clampdown on levels we haven't seen previously. So again, short story, it's very bad inside of Iran right now.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah, I really wanted to make sure that people got that full scope. We forget that there's an Internet blackout. We forget that Iranians have already dealt with such a repressive crackdown right before the war started. You know, like, I want people to make the connection that, like, conditions are super, super dire. You know, since you did mention that point, maybe we can elaborate a little bit. How do you think the Iranian regime is using this moment? I know short term they are utilizing it to just crack down on any dissent, but how do you think it'll be used? Kind of medium and long term.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yeah. So, you know, in our line of work, it's always hard to make predictions, but we can use past experiences as a somewhat of a guide here. So just to remind your listeners, in January, there was a major uprising of Iranians against their government. And there was one of the most massive crackdowns since the 1980s when there was a massacre against political dissidents. And so going into this war, there was already one of the most brutal crackdowns happening. And then what people who are much more knowledgeable about Iran's domestic politics are telling me is that the people who are essentially replacing the leaders that were killed by US Israeli strikes are more hardliner and are more aligned with the hardline factions of the IRGC or Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is one branch of the military in Iran that is very, very powerful and is loyal to the supreme leader, who is now the son of the previous supreme leader, who was killed on the first day of the war, actually. And so using the last time Iran was at a war, which was in the Iran Iraq war, repression is going to get so much worse under war conditions, because anyone who they don't like or who, anyone who speaks out can then be made a traitor and an enemy of the Iranian people. And so they can use warfare as the grounds to essentially go even further in their oppression. And that's what a lot of human rights activists and people on the ground are worried about.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah. I also read a really interesting article. I'll put in the show notes about the popular mobilization that the Iranian regime has, like, really fostered over, you know, many years through a variety of ways, whether it's through inserting, you know, their forces in universities or through particular kinds of cultural practices around, like, martyrs and things like that. So, like, the Iranian regime is also kind of mobilizing its supporters in a way that, I mean, obviously for people who, like, want democracy and freedom, like, this is. This is the worst case scenario. We, as in the United States, I shouldn't take responsibility for that at all.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

But neither of us should.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah, neither really. It's not, it's not our fault, but we really have, you know, given the worst actors, a huge victory.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

And also to that point, if you don't mind me jumping in.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah, yeah, of course.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

It's also, you know, triggered nationalism among segments of the population. The war has made many people who were even protesting in January against the government now coming out and defending at least not the, the sovereignty of their country or the integrity of their country.

[Dana El Kurd]

I mean, makes sense.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yeah. So there's all these strange. Now alliances forming and the government is actually playing some parts of it smartly, where you'll see them having women without hijab coming to pro government rallies and having a Lebanese woman singer's voice at their rallies, which, for those of you who don't know, women are not allowed to sing as solo artists in Iran. They can be part of a chorus. So they're also playing this interesting imaging game where they want to also show, look, we can also be open and inclusive at the same time that they're executing people at the highest rate since the 1980s.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah, I'm going to have to look for that video of the Lebanese singer.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Foreign.

[Jennie Garth]

This is Jenny Garth from I Choose Me with Jennie Garth. You know, history is full of surprising little details and laundry. Turns out it's got its own fascinating story, too, because not all detergents are created equal. Tide Liquid Laundry detergent isn't just clean, it's boosted clean for cleaner, whiter, brighter and fresher results compared to Tide simply. And those stubborn stains that always seem to show up at the worst times. Tide tackles 100% of common stains for every load. Every time. Now, if grease is your nemesis, think food spills, cooking splatters. Tide's got 10 times grease fighting ingredients compared to bargain brands. And it works in a machine, in any water condition, on all your machine washable fabrics. It's no wonder Tide was America's number one detergent in sales last year. So if it's gotta be clean and it's gotta be fresh, it's gotta be Tide. Shop now at your local retailer. Tide is a proud sponsor of the Elton John Impact Awards, honoring those who have helped shape a more inclusive and compassionate world with their artistry, advocacy and unwavering commitment to equality. You won't want to miss the Elton John Impact Awards podcast, available on June 1st on the iHeartRadio app. And everywhere podcasts are heard.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

Number one hits, millions of records sold awards, sold out tours. You think the Jonas Brothers are satisfied?

[Dana El Kurd]

Nope.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

It's podcast time.

We, we get to ask other people

[Dana El Kurd]

questions because we're sick and tired of being asked questions.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

A Jonas is available now and their first guest is a big one, Paul Rudd.

You know, Steve Carell is a great singer.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Didn't he tell you not to audition at the office or something?

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

I told him, whoa, we were filming Anchorman. Clearly I was the idiot. Thank God he didn't listen to me, right?

Listen to hey Jonas on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is Saigon, the story of my

[Dana El Kurd]

family and of the country that shaped us.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

The United States will not stand by and allow how any power, however great, take over another country. From iheart Podcasts, Saigon.

[Dana El Kurd]

Please allow me to introduce Joseph Sherman.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

You don't think I'm serious about a free Vietnam?

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

I should stop talking so much. I like hearing you talk.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

One city, a divided country and the war that tore America apart.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

This is for Vietnam. I've taken a hit from Japanese ground fire.

[Dana El Kurd]

Do you read me? They're pouring petrol all over here. Him, he's holding matches.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

I'm on a landmine.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

For freedom. Let's get out. Freedom come at night.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

Saigon. Starring Kelly Marie Tran and Rob Benedict.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Staying here's madness.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

The world should hear about this.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

There's a fire coming to this country

[Dana El Kurd]

and it's going to burn out everything.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

Listen to Saigon on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

In 2023, a story gripped the UK evoking horror and disbelief.

The nurse who should have been in charge of caring for tiny Babies is now the most prolific child killer in modern British history.

Everyone thought they knew how it ended. A verdict. A villain, a nurse named Lucy Letby.

[Dana El Kurd]

Lucy Letby has been found guilty.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

But what if we didn't get the. The whole story?

The moment you look at the whole picture, the case collapses.

I'm Amanda Knox, and in the new podcast the Case of Lucy Letby, we follow the evidence and hear from the people that lived it to ask what really happened when the world decided who Lucy Letby was.

[Dana El Kurd]

No voicing of any skepticism or doubt.

[Podcast Announcer/Advertiser]

It'll cause so much harm at every single level of the British establishment of this is wrong.

Listen to Doubt the Case of Lucy Letby. You can binge all episodes now on iHeart podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Dana El Kurd]

So we participated, both of us, in a symposium at Princeton, I think was titled like the Long Arc of Fascism. Very interesting set of presentations. And your presentation was about the different kind of political strands that facilitated this war on Iran. So I just wanted to just start off with. Could you outline the argument of your presentation for our listeners?

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yes. What I argued in the conference, which was fantastic and I really learned so much from your presentation as well, was the idea that this war was made possible in a sense, because several different strands of fascism have come together in this moment. And I called it converging fascisms, just to go quickly through it, because I don't want to drill on and on, but the idea is that one of the core strands has been this growing anti Muslim sentiment that really goes across so many different fascist movements that we see whether it's the far right in Europe. Here in the United States, Islamophobia is so central. And of course, the shootings at the mosque in San Diego is just the latest of long string of violence. The Hindutva in India, anti Muslim sentiments racism is central to the fascism that we see there. And then of course, in Israel, that's been a core element of their anti Palestinian racism generally, but also specifically anti Muslim racism. So that's kind of the big strand that I identified as coming together. And within that there's an inflection of anti Shia sentiment. And there's lots of scholars who have talked about how really the anti Muslim project starts with the 79 revolution, this like modern manifestation of it. And so it's always had this anti Shia sentiment to it.

[Dana El Kurd]

Inflection.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yeah, inflection. Thank you. The second strand that I wanted to highlight was this white supremacy and Aryanism, which is interesting because it actually loops in the far Right. Of Iranian actors and Iranian diasporic actors, in particular, those that are tied to the former Shah of Iran's son, Reza Pahlavi, who are really linking their wanting to overthrow the regime in Iran to restoring this Aryan nation that existed before. And this is their words, not mine. The Arab invasion of Islam. And this is really important for the far right movement that supported this invasion was this idea that they're going to save Iran from Islam, which again, the Islamophobia, but also the racialized violence against Arabs in the region and particularly against Palestinians. There's this very strong anti Palestinian current in this movement that I'm talking about where they are actively recruiting and aligning themselves with Israel in the genocide, which is so horrible. The third strand that I wanted to talk about was settler colonialism and nativism. And I think your listeners probably know enough about this, but this is essentially the bringing together of both the settler colonial violence that we see in Israel, the United States, Australia, et cetera, with the anti immigrant sentiment that has swept across much of the world, including in places like South Africa. Then the next strand that I talk about is nostalgic paternalism. I call it that you always need

[Dana El Kurd]

a little bit of patriarchy. Right?

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Right. Yeah, yeah. And it's basically like the people who call Trump daddy, you know, this idea that we need some strong man in our lives. And like Egyptians had this with Sisi, you know, this, this idea that we just need this strong man to guide us forward is, is so dominant in a lot of these fascist groups. Modi is somebody's, you know, paternal figure. And again, Reza Pahlavi, this, the self proclaimed leader of the Iranian opposition in exile, has numerous times called himself the father of the Iranian people. And he's used really cringe language around how Iran is this abused woman and he's going to come in and save it. And completely out of touch with this amazing feminist movement that came out of Iran organically in 2022 called the Woman Life Freedom Movement. He's put himself in direct opposition against that movement, which is wild to think about. And then the last kind of fascist strand that I identified, and this really also links to Naomi Klein's work, who was also at the conference, are these techno fascists. And that's like the palantirs, the anthropic dystopian future that a lot of these techno bros want to impose on the world that is very anti human. And so all of these strands come together at this very particular moment to justify and advance a war that some actors have wanted for a long time. And I say that it's kind of the blending of these at this particular moment that enabled this war.

[Dana El Kurd]

Effy? Yeah, I think the convergence is an apt description. And yet especially the patriarchal stuff, like cringe is the right word. It's extremely cringe, but also, you know, dangerous that all of these things are coming, coming together to facilitate this kind of violence. And then the. The war in Iran is facilitating the expansion of fascism here and vice versa. I wanted to just kind of get your opinion of something. I read this article by Mustafa Bayoumi in the Guardian about how in the United States, what actually drives Islamophobia is, at its root, anti Palestinian racism. I mean, and you certainly, you know, in your presentation talked about that strand as well in the Iranian context. Is the anti Palestinian racism kind of tangential to the kind of broader racialized Islamophobia? Yeah. How would you see that?

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yeah, no, I agree to a large extent to what Biomi is saying. I think anti Palestinian racism is central to how the opposition in Iran views itself. This hasn't been helped by the fact that the Iranian government, the current Iranian government, has been, at least materially and ideologically, one of the biggest supporters of Palestinian liberation and has used the issue as many other dictators in the region have, by the way, have used the issue to actually suppress and oppress their own people. And so for a long time, there was a sentiment inside Iran that the Iranian government is sending its resources, sending its weapons, making Iran an isolated rogue state on behalf of the Palestinians while we, the Iranian people, suffer. And so this created this people to people tension where anti Palestinian sentiment grew inside Iran and outside Iran, obviously, in these. In these fascist movements. And then that feeds back into the Islamophobia, this idea that we have nothing in common with the Palestinians because they are part of a religion that has also oppressed us or a part of a ethnic group that has oppressed us. So it's this feedback loop that's pretty horrible.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's good that we outlined kind of the different mechanisms there. And it's really, you know, it's so unfortunate because, like, you see, polling of, like, Palestinians and Palestinians were very much against what the Iranian regime did in Syria, for example. Yeah, but like you said, there's a weaponization of these. These different causes, just like the United States weaponizes the woman life freedom movement. You know, every regime uses things for its benefit.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Just to add, like, a slightly hopeful note is that I actually think the experience of this war has actually made more thoughtful Iranians see more of themselves now in the struggle of Palestinians. Interesting, because they are actually seeing the hollowness and hypocrisy of what the US And Israel say and do. And so now I think there's been a little bit of a shift back in the direction of solidarity with the Palestinians.

[Dana El Kurd]

Oh, that's. That's excellent to hear. You know, we could talk about this all day. Like, there's such a disconnect between diasporas and what happens on the ground. And this is not specific to the Iranians, but I imagine even if you lean that way, but you're in Iran being bombed by Israel, that's going to change your opinion in a way that, like, if you're in Los Angeles waving the Israeli flag, it's a little bit different.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Absolutely.

[Dana El Kurd]

There's kind of stakes there.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yeah, yeah. You're like, who's the one dropping the bombs?

[Dana El Kurd]

Exactly.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yeah, yeah.

[Dana El Kurd]

That is actually a very hopeful note before I turn it to a less hopeful one. So your research is on, as I said earlier, like, kind of the think tank landscape in dc. I remember, by the way, finding out about you back in the heydays of Twitter and being like, somebody's studying think tanks. Like, that's so cool. That's so clever. Like, yes, we should be studying them in this way. And basically, like, your research is like the types of knowledge and the sources of knowledge that become hegemonic in these spaces and then that of course, impact American policy. So could you, I know this is kind of a hard ask, but could you tell us, like, some basic findings of your, of your research the past couple of years?

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Yeah, so thanks for that setup because I actually have a book coming out on this and it's called the Geopolitics of Expertise. And that's one of the central findings of the book, is that this think tank landscape needs to be understood as a transnational space. That's one of the key findings in which a lot of actors and stakeholders, especially from the Middle east or Swana region, are invested in shaping the narrative from the inside out. And this is something that I think traditional models of understanding US Empire, for example, failed in understanding, which is that, you know, when you have Arab Gulf states or Turkey or Morocco or Israel invested in ensuring the debate in Washington is shaped in a particular way that meets their interest, which is not always aligned with the US they're going to throw millions of dollars into think tanks to essentially shape what I call the common sense on any number of issues. And so they are co constructing the imperial Imagination. And this is one of the key findings. And then when it comes to Iran in particular, they paradoxically want to ensure that Iran remains an unknowable enemy. That's the other key piece of the book, which is that this constructed unknowability is key to ensuring that the US maintains a posture of confrontation with Iran. And that means that you want to have this enemy that you can never fully figure out, or this enemy that's always unpredictable, this enemy that never follows the rules. Because if you had a predictable rational enemy, you'd eventually have to make some type of peace with them, because that's actually the rational course of action. But when you have weapons manufacturers, when you have foreign governments, when you have all kinds of interests shaping the debate in Washington, you don't actually do what's, quote unquote, the rational policy for US national security interests as narrowly defined. So sorry if that was too rambly of a explanation of the book, but.

[Dana El Kurd]

No, not at all. I mean, it's interesting because we come at it from different disciplines. You know, I'm a political scientist and in the international relations landscape there was, you know, well, first and foremost, like American empire is not really recognized in like American political science. But there was this argument that percolated and like I remember going to grad school and learning this is that like the United States is hegemonic and we can like study hierarchy. And there have been political scientists who have studied like global hierarchies, but it's a liberal hegemon and it can't be considered an empire because it does provide these voice opportunities for our subordinates essentially to come and shape policy.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Interesting.

[Dana El Kurd]

And so it's an interesting, not a flip on its head, but it's like kind of a nuancing of that argument here is like, yeah, they are here and they are shaping policy and shaping kind of US empire, which I think, you know, poses some questions about like the agency of these actors, of course, but also like, what is the broader project of US Empire? Like, yeah, we don't need to think of it all the time as like kind of top down in a way.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Exactly.

[Dana El Kurd]

There's lots of actors implicated or coherent

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

or right or right or, you know, even the Iran war is a clear example. Right. There's been winners and losers, as people in D.C. like to say of this war. Oil companies are reaping the greatest profits of like the last decade because of this war, because of the shortages coming through the Strait of Hormuzza. Weapons manufacturers are doing really well right now. Private equity and AI are doing well, but the damages that we are now seeing coming out of the production side across the Gulf, including inside Iran, is going to have very long term detrimental effects for all of these same industries, paradoxically. But in the short term, they're winning. Meanwhile, everybody else is losing. Food prices are going up, gas prices are going up. I have a friend who works in research with helium. There's no helium in the world right now. So if you want to go get an mri, good luck, because there's not much helium. Most of it comes out of this one facility in Qatar.

[Dana El Kurd]

And I was just reading an article about how Qatar has lost so many billions of dollars as a result of this war, as a result of the attacks on some of its facilities. And it's like Doha is a ghost town. And I used to live in Doha. And for anybody who has, you know, been there or whatever, I mean, Doha, like, at its best is a ghost town. Like, often it is a ghost town if it's not like a busy season. So, like, what even does it mean that these places. I can't even fathom what's going to happen long term given the impact of this war.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

And that was with just 60 days of war, right?

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah. So we don't know.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

It's like, in such a short amount of time. The amount of damage it caused is unbelievable.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah. Like you said, it's good to start to disentangle who's. Who is benefiting in service of which actors here. Are we attacking Iran? Yeah. And this is like the most corrupt administration imaginable. It really is, like, kind of breathtaking, the, the level of corruption. So, yeah, hopefully, you know, historians and political scientists and political anthropologists will have years and years of research to study this moment. All right, well, is there anything else you think people should keep an eye on when it comes to the situation in Iran moving forward?

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

I think we need to be much more critical about who is shaping the narrative on Iran moving forward. A lot of the figures who are now disavowing the war in these think tanks and saying war was such a bad idea, Trump fumbled it, and this was a terrible idea, had essentially been, I say, hedging for this war for a long time, which is that by constructing Iran as this unknowable enemy, you can't negotiate with an enemy that you can never predict. You can never negotiate with an enemy that lies about everything. These are the narratives that these Iran experts have been advancing for years. And now we're expected to go and turn back to that Same group to get us out of this mess. And that's what I would urge all of the listeners is be much more critical about who is analyzing Iran in such a moment. Look at who they work for. Look at what types of analysis they've done in the past. How do they access Iran? How do they know what they know about Iran? It sometimes takes five extra minutes when you're reading a New York Times piece to just go through and highlight who they're quoting as experts, for example. And New York Times has all kinds of problems, but pick whatever. Wall Street Journal, Foreign affairs, foreign Policy, and just do things. Five minutes of due diligence on who that piece is citing as an expert on Iran. And that's my key takeaway for people.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah, that's such a good takeaway. I mean, I think there's so many aspects of our politics in which people are trying to convince us. The same people who got us into these messes are. Are like, all we have. Like, Democratic Party operatives that, like, led us to Trump.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Exactly.

[Dana El Kurd]

Are the ones, like, now pretending they really dislike the genocide in Gaza and whatever. And it's the same thing. These Iranian experts, they're not even Iranian. Sometimes it's. It's just Iran experts claiming expertise. And it's like the way that you have shaped this discussion is why we're at this point. So. Yeah, that's a very good takeaway. I appreciate that. Yeah. Thank you so much, Nagar. This has been really enriching.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Thank you so much, Dana.

[Dana El Kurd]

I will put all of the things we talked about in the show Notes. Does your book have a publication date yet?

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

No, but I signed the contract, so. Okay, good, good.

[Dana El Kurd]

So people be on the lookout.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

But it'll be with Stanford University Press, so.

[Dana El Kurd]

Yeah, excellent, excellent. So I will make sure to note that and flag that.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

Thank you. Thanks so much for having me. I really appreciate it. Of course,

[Dana El Kurd]

It Could Happen. Here is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, Visit our website, coolzone media.com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find sources for. It Could Happen here, listed directly in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.

[Dr. Nagar Razavi]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Dana El Kurd]

Guaranteed Human.