Loading summary
Speaker A
You mentioned earlier Randy Newman. And when I think about this song, I mean, it's like if you're listening to this, like, God forbid you think about Randy Newman, because you'll instantly just be like, I have like seven minutes to wade through right now. When you think about a song like Song for the Dead, that's a song that I think a addresses this stuff in a way that is. It's very caustic. But I, I think that that is demanded and needed of this kind of material. I think a song like Born in the USA actually manages to thread the needle and be a. A pop song and actually also be as emotionally powerful as a song like Song for the Dead. When we're talking about songs about Vietnam and I feel like Good Night Saigon is basically like the most like, milquetoast middle of the road. Like, it's not bad, but is not even close.
Speaker B
But that's, that's who he milquetoast middle of the road is who Billy Joel is, like, controlling for the fact that it is Billy Joel. And it's going to be him singing and it's going to be his emotional register and his style of music making. And it's not gonna be a caustic Randy Newman spare piano ballad. And it's not gonna be Born in the usa. It's also not gonna be clean cut kid. I think that it, you know, to see him actually willingly step up to the plate like this and actually try to make a statement about something that was, you know, like an actual political statement, you know, state what's the political statement. He avoids, you know, calling balls and strikes when it comes to any sort of, you know, actual political, you know, analysis here, as he probably should. A pop song is not the place for that. But it's more focused on the actual, you know, people who went through this shit. The same thing that Rambo did, you know, which came out right around this point in time. I just like, I think this was in American culture at this moment in time, you know, Apocalypse now in 1979, just a couple years before this.
Speaker A
If you're comparing this to Apocalypse.
Speaker B
Well, I'm not, but they're both focused on. Again, he's obviously not the Francis Ford Coppola of making records, but everyone, you know, the culture at large is struggling with this, is struggling with this topic at this moment in time in the 1980s. And rather than running away from it and feeling like, yeah, I'm just a pop songwriter, I'm just Brill building type of guy, I'm just Gonna write. You maybe write for the nine millionth time or whatever, he actually puts something on the line and goes for it here. And I think, again, understanding that it's Billy Joel and it's gonna be kind of schmaltzy and it's not gonna have the cleanest lyrics and it's not going to be the most inventive piece of music that's ever made. I think it works.
Speaker C
I betcha. The average. Again, I'm just making up stats here, but I bet you the average Vietnam vet likes Good Night Saigon better than Born in the usa. That's what I'm putting out there.
Speaker B
I would. I would tend to agree.
Speaker A
Once again, you agree with this made up.
Speaker C
Okay.
Speaker B
Well, no, I just like, like, you know, he's. He's just. He's the lingua franca for people that. Because, like, no one was listening to these Bob Dylan records that were coming out at this moment in time or the Lou Reed record, like, you know, record people were listening. Music people, but like, just normal ass people. The men on the street, to use Bob Dylan's parlance, were just listening to whatever was on the radio and whatever was sold to them in the record store. Whatever was big. And like, I would guarantee you many more people, you know, reckoned with the Vietnam War to whatever extent they should have or could have or whatever, via.
Speaker A
Billy Joel's Good Night Saigon.
Speaker B
Yes, exactly.
Speaker C
It's kind of like. And again, I'm probably making stuff up here, but I think there's a Vietnam memorial that's a whole bunch of names written on a stone, you know, in Washington, D.C. but there's also, like a bunch of statues of soldiers. Okay, And I think it was a compromise. Again, fact check me, please. But I think it was a compromise where, like, the artists wanted the names of the victims on the stone, but, like, the soldiers wanted, like, depictions of soldiers, you know, in statue form. And that's the thing here. You got Bruce, who's like an artist, you know, who's subversively singing about the pains of war and whatnot to a catchy Born in the usa, you know, and then there's Billy, who's doing more of a hard on your sleeve thing. But again, I think that hits a little bit, you know, in the same way that, you know, some people might like Rambo more than the Kubrick movie Full Metal Jacket. And also, can we just say, like, I love the acoustic guitar early on in the song. Like, it sounds really good. And he goes real quiet and slowly builds some of the lyrics. Clunky. Remember Charlie? Remember Baker? They left their childhood on every acre. Like, what are you talking about? But other moments, you know, they sent us Playboy, they gave us Bob Hope. I thought that was to the point. And not trying to be like, flourishy and whatnot. And then who was wrong, who was right, it didn't matter. In the thick of the fight again. I mean, it's very on the nose, but also, I'm not always opposed to that.
Speaker B
Yeah, I mean, we don't want. Frankly, if Billy Joel is going to come out and start actually diagramming the politics of the Vietnam War, in his estimation, we're probably not going to like the conclusions that he's coming to. So I think the sort of not taking sides and just focusing on the micro, the small scale, you know, the emotional.
Speaker A
This is not the micro, though. This is not the small scale. This is just like the war. It happened. People were fighting during the war and then they shot at us and then we said, we're going to get through this. It's like not micro at all. Like, he has more emotional intelligence in Piano Man Think talking about people in a bar than he shows even an ounce of on this song where it's just dumb. It's propaganda level. Just like.
Speaker B
What is it propaganda for?
Speaker A
Exactly. It's not even successful at that. It's just like, this really happened and we should just. You should think about it. It's like overblown sense importance. Importance full of pomp and circumstance and yet says nothing and doesn't even have the courage or the curiosity to. To say something specific about this conflict or the people in it. Whereas, like, a songic Born in the USA happens to have this devastating set of lyrics and lyrics that actually have remarkable specificity. Like the thing about the picture.
Speaker C
He's got a picture of him in her arms. That's a great touch.
Speaker A
They're still there. He's all gone.
Speaker B
I feel like you're setting up a bit of a straw man here to be like, I don't think I get.
Speaker C
Goosebumps sometimes hearing this song, honestly.
Speaker B
Yeah, I think it's. I think it is effective. I don't think Matt, or I. Certainly not to speak for you, Matt, but I wouldn't say that this is as good as Bored in the USA or that Billy Joel is as great of an artist as Bruce Springsteen. But I think for Billy Joel, this is. This is about as much as you can expect.
Speaker A
I'm holding Billy to a higher standard because I've seen him be better than this. He is capable of being a better writer than this. And on his most famous song, piano man, he gives a sense of the characters, of the place, of the people, of the internal life of these people. And this song is just. I want to write a song that's really big about this war, and it does that, but it's so big that it doesn't have what it needs to address this material.
Speaker B
That's a fair critique today.
Podcast Summary: Jokermen – "Teaser // Billy Joel: THE NYLON CURTAIN with Matt Farley"
Release Date: July 14, 2025
In this teaser episode of the Jokermen Podcast titled "Billy Joel: THE NYLON CURTAIN with Matt Farley," host Jokermen delves into the intricate landscape of Billy Joel's music, specifically focusing on his approach to addressing the Vietnam War through his song "Good Night Saigon." Joined by co-host Matt Farley, the discussion navigates the complexities of songwriting amidst historical and cultural backdrops, juxtaposing Joel’s work with contemporaries like Randy Newman and Bruce Springsteen.
The conversation opens with Speaker A referencing Randy Newman's "Song for the Dead," highlighting its caustic and emotionally potent take on war:
Speaker A [00:00]: "Song for the Dead, that's a song that I think addresses this stuff in a way that is very caustic. But I think that that is demanded and needed of this kind of material."
In contrast, Speaker B points out Billy Joel's more restrained and emotional style:
Speaker B [01:11]: "But Billy Joel is milquetoast middle of the road... it is Billy Joel. And it's going to be him singing and it's going to be his emotional register and his style of music making."
This sets the stage for a deeper exploration of how different artists tackle the same heavy subject matter through varied musical and lyrical expressions.
A significant portion of the discussion centers around comparing Billy Joel's "Good Night Saigon" with Bruce Springsteen's "Born in the USA." Speaker A criticizes Joel's approach as less impactful:
Speaker A [06:14]: "This is not the micro, though. This is not the small scale... it's propaganda level."
Conversely, Speaker B defends Joel’s song, acknowledging its place within the broader cultural conversation:
Speaker B [03:21]: "Well, no... I just like, like, you know, he's the lingua franca for people... were just listening to whatever was on the radio."
Speaker C adds an anecdotal perspective, suggesting that "Good Night Saigon" resonates more with Vietnam veterans:
Speaker C [03:02]: "I betcha the average Vietnam vet likes Good Night Saigon better than Born in the USA."
The trio debates the effectiveness and emotional resonance of each song, considering factors like lyrical specificity and musical composition.
The hosts contextualize "Good Night Saigon" within the late 1970s and early 1980s American culture, a period rife with reflections on the Vietnam War:
Speaker B [02:19]: "Like Apocalypse Now in 1979, just a couple years before this."
They draw parallels between the song and seminal war-related films, emphasizing how both Joel’s music and cinematic pieces grapple with national trauma and memory.
Speaker C brings in architectural analogies, referencing the Vietnam Memorial and its artistic compromises:
Speaker C [04:00]: "There's a Vietnam memorial with names on stone, but also statues of soldiers... it's a compromise."
This analogy serves to illustrate the balance artists like Joel must strike between personal expression and public expectation.
Speaker A offers a critical perspective on Joel’s lyrical execution, suggesting a lack of depth compared to his other works like "Piano Man":
Speaker A [07:49]: "I'm holding Billy to a higher standard because I've seen him be better than this... this song is just... overblown sense importance and says nothing."
Speaker B provides a counterpoint, recognizing the song's limitations while defending its place in Joel’s repertoire:
Speaker B [07:34]: "I think it is effective... I wouldn't say that this is as good as Born in the USA or that Billy Joel is as great of an artist as Bruce Springsteen. But I think for Billy Joel, this is about as much as you can expect."
The critique revolves around the song’s inability to delve deeply into the personal and political nuances of war, instead opting for broad emotional strokes that may lack the incisiveness found in other war-themed music.
Despite the critiques, there are acknowledgments of the song's musical strengths. Speaker A praises the acoustic guitar and the song’s build-up:
Speaker A [04:03]: "I love the acoustic guitar early on in the song... he goes real quiet and slowly builds some of the lyrics."
Additionally, Speaker C notes the emotional impact of specific lyrical moments:
Speaker C [07:21]: "He's got a picture of him in her arms. That's a great touch."
These elements highlight that while the song may falter in lyrical depth, its musical and emotional composition still resonates with listeners.
The episode concludes with a nuanced appreciation of Billy Joel's "Good Night Saigon." While acknowledging its shortcomings in lyrical complexity and political depth, the hosts recognize its role in bridging the gap between mainstream pop music and the profound subject of war. Speaker B encapsulates this sentiment:
Speaker B [08:20]: "That's a fair critique today."
The discussion underscores the challenges artists face when addressing significant historical events within the constraints of their musical styles and public personas.
This teaser episode of the Jokermen Podcast offers a compelling exploration of Billy Joel's "Good Night Saigon," providing listeners with critical insights into its artistic and cultural significance. Through a balanced discussion, the hosts dissect the song's strengths and weaknesses, positioning it within the broader tapestry of war-themed music and American cultural reflection.
Listeners interested in the intersection of music, history, and cultural commentary will find this episode both informative and thought-provoking, setting the stage for deeper dives into similar topics in future episodes.