← Serial Killers & Murderous Minds
Serial Killers & Murderous Minds
SERIAL KILLER: "The Ypsilanti Ripper" John Norman Collins Pt. 2 with Katie Ring from America's Most Infamous Crimes
01:02:37
Loading summary
Transcript108 lines
- [00:02]
Vanessa Richardson
Hi listeners, it's Vanessa. Before we get into today's episode, I want to tell you about another show I think you'll love. Hidden history with Dr. Harini Bhat. Every Monday, Dr. Bhat goes where history gets mysterious. Vanished civilizations, doomsday prophecies, paranormal phenomena and events that science still can't fully explain. Dr. Bot treats these moments like open case files. Not myths, not superstition, just incomplete explanations waiting for a closer look. Hidden History drops every Monday. Follow now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen, so you never miss a mystery.
- [00:52]
Crime House Announcer
This is Crime House.
- [00:56]
Katie Ring
Self confidence plays a huge role in all of our lives. Whether it's career goals or personal aspirations. We need a healthy dose dose of confidence in order to achieve anything. However, some people's confidence can go too far. Maybe they think they're too good for others, or they don't realize when they're not as good at something as they think they are. And in other cases, overconfidence causes people to do horrifying things without a second thought. John Norman Collins had that kind of confidence. Whether he was breaking into homes or brutally taking someone's life, John believed he could do whatever he wanted with impunity. But John was his own worst enemy. And his hubris would be his downfall. Because all it took was one wrong move for his gruesome crimes to come to light.
- [01:59]
Vanessa Richardson
The human mind is powerful. It shapes how we we think, feel, love and hate. But sometimes it drives people to commit the unthinkable. This is Serial Killers and Murderous Minds, A Crime House Original. I'm Vanessa Richardson, and today Dr. Engels and I are joined again by Katie Ring, host of the Crime House original, America's Most Infamous Crimes.
- [02:22]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Hi again.
- [02:22]
Katie Ring
So excited to be back.
- [02:24]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Honestly, Katie, join us anytime. And for anyone listening, if you didn't follow and subscribe to America's Most Infamous Crimes after our last episode, make sure to do it now. Remember, you can find it audio only on podcasting platforms and with video on YouTube.
- [02:40]
Vanessa Richardson
Definitely subscribe. And just like last time, Katie will introduce today's episode. And be sure to stick around at the end as we sit down for an extended discussion on today's case.
- [02:50]
Katie Ring
Thanks, Vanessa. Before we get started, please be advised that this episode contains discussion of explicit sexual violence against women and minors. So please listen with care. Today, Vanessa and Dr. Angles conclude their deep dive into the mind of John Norman Collins, AKA the Ypsilanti Ripper, a seemingly ordinary college student who became one of the most feared serial killers in Michigan history. After suffering a troubled childhood, John used his wholesome, all American Persona to get ahead, and once he'd earned the trust of everyone around him, he used it to hide in plain sight while he hunted down innocent young women and girls. As Vanessa goes through the story, Dr. Angles will be talking about things like why some violent offenders insert themselves into investigations, why they reveal information that could shed light on their guilt before they've been caught, and how past trauma can fester and serve as the driving force behind some killers rage. And as always, they'll be asking the question, what makes a killer?
- [03:56]
Vanessa Richardson
If you've tried to lose weight before, you know how frustrating it can be to feel like nothing really sticks. The cycle of starting over again and again can get exhausting. That's why Weight Loss by Hers is designed to offer a more sustainable approach with access to an affordable range of FDA approved GLP1 medications, including the Wegovy pill and the Wegovy pen. With Wegovy through hers, you can lose up to 20% or more of your body weight when combined with diet and exercise. It works by helping regulate your appetite so you can eat less and maintain progress over time. And for those looking for an alternative to injections, it's also available as the first GLP one in a pill. Ready to reach your goals? Visit forhers.com cereal to get personalized, affordable care that gets you that's f o r h e r s.com s e r I a l forhers.com serial weight loss by hers is not available in all 50 states. WeGovy is the registered trademark of Novo Nordisk as to get started and learn more, including important safety information, WeGovy clinical study information and restrictions, visit forhers.com I've been cleaning out my closet and simplifying my wardrobe, just focusing on pieces that make everyday dressing feel simpler, not more complicated. That's really why Quince has been such an easy brand to keep coming back to. Everything has that clean, minimal look that makes it easy to put out outfits together without overthinking it. The pieces are designed to be versatile, so they work across a lot of different outfits and situations, which makes building a reliable rotation feel pretty effortless. I've been leaning on their basics a lot because they just remove a lot of the guesswork from getting ready. What's also been consistent is how comfortable everything feels while it still looks polished. The fabrics are soft right away, but they don't lose their structure or feel worn out as the day goes on. I picked up a few items, expecting them to just be simple staples but they've ended up becoming some of the most reached four pieces I own. Refresh your everyday with luxury you'll actually use head to quint.commurous for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's Q U I-n c e.commurous for free shipping and 365 day returns quince.commurous by the fall of 1968, 21 year old John Norman Collins had allegedly killed 19 year old Mary Flezar and 20 year old Joan Schell. Both women were students at Eastern Michigan University. Just like John, he'd seen both of them around before he attacked them. One year apart. John sexually assaulted and brutally stabbed both of his victims, and after disposing of their bodies, he likely went back to move them so they'd be found faster. John enjoyed the thrill of causing widespread fear, all while flying under the radar. Even though he was questioned as a suspect in Joan's murder, the police didn't even bother to check his alibi, possibly because his uncle worked for the state police, which meant authorities were struggling to figure out who had killed Mary and Joan. Detectives in Ypsilanti and Ann Arbor where Joan's body had been found, had formed a task force and were on high alert. The Ann Arbor police chief even stated publicly that there was a psycho killer on the loose. Female students at EMU were living in fear. They walked around campus in groups or with trusted male friends, and John loved witnessing all the chaos he'd created. At the same time, he knew he had to lay low before striking again. But he wouldn't wait forever. Eight months after allegedly killing Joan, he was ready to strike again. This time, he reportedly set his sights on someone with a different profile from his past victims. Marilyn Skelton did not attend EMU. In fact, she was only 16 years old. But she had friends at EMU and often hung out with them where they lived off campus, including an apartment complex where some of John's friends lived. Most likely, John noticed Marilyn while spending time there. It's unclear how John got Marilyn alone, but on March 22, 1969, she had plans to meet up with a friend and failed to show up. So her boyfriend quickly reported her missing. Shortly after, things took a dark turn. The day after Marilyn's boyfriend contacted police, her parents received a phone call. An unfamiliar male voice told them they would find Marilyn, quote, laid out somewhere with bullets in her head.
- [08:41]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Marilyn was younger, but she still fits a pattern. She was someone that he had observed, someone within his Environment. And again, someone who had a boyfriend. That consistency is notable, but so is the phone call, if it in fact was him. Calling her parents allows him to remain psychologically engaged in the crime, similar to what we saw with Mary. But this is also a psychological escalation. It crosses significant boundaries and reinserts him directly into her family. That suggests that he is focused on the emotional impact that this crime had on her family. And given that he is already deriving excitement from the fear that is growing on campus because of his crimes, this fits his pattern. It also reinforces his need for control. But more than that, authorship, he's now shaping how his crime is experienced, how it unfolds, and how it's communicated. And that reflects an increase in both risk taking and confidence. And as we discussed, with each successful offense, that confidence gets reinforced, and this is a direct result of that.
- [09:48]
Vanessa Richardson
In general, why do violent offenders sometimes try to get close to investigations, like by making contact with victims, family members, like in this case with John, police, or anyone else involved. Why does that happen?
- [10:00]
Dr. Tristan Engels
It's not much different than what we're seeing here. With John. In general, it's a continued psychological investment in the crime. They want to remain connected to what they've done and why that is can vary. Most often, it's about control. In other cases, it's about reliving the event. Especially for offenders who keep trophies or souvenirs, proximity allows them to re experience the intensity, the emotions and the sense of power that was tied to the act itself. There's also a clear risk taking component. Reinserting themselves increases the chance of being caught. But for some, that risk becomes part of the appeal, especially if it's previously gone undetected. And for others, it's about recognition and authorship. It's also about shaping the narrative and maintaining a sense of control over how the crime is experienced by others, like the Zodiac killer, for example. And it can also be a combination of these things.
- [10:55]
Vanessa Richardson
If John was trying to scare Marilyn's loved ones, it worked. They feared she was the killer's next victim. And on March 25, they were met with the tragic reality. That day, a construction worker found Marilyn's body at a building site less than a quarter mile from where Joan Shell's body had been found. However, it didn't appear that the killer had come back to move Marilyn's body like he had with his previous victims, but the level of violence was the same. When the police analyzed Marilyn's body, they discovered that a shirt had been shoved into her mouth and a belt Was wound tightly around her neck. She'd been so badly beaten, her skull was crushed. Authorities weren't surprised by the brutality. After all, it matched what the first two victims had suffered. But they were surprised when Marilyn's autopsy results showed that she'd been on her period when she died. Just like Mary and Joan, it seemed like a pattern they couldn't brush off as a coincidence. Pretty soon, they learned something else shocking when the news broke. A local restaurant owner told police he'd seen Marilyn at his establishment on March 23, just one day after she was reported missing. At the time, the owner hadn't recognized her, so he didn't have any reason to be suspicious. When she pulled into the drive thru to order four hamburgers, the restaurant owner couldn't recall whether Marilyn was alone at the time. But now the task force realized that the killer was probably acquainted with each of his victims, which was how he was able to lure them in. Still, investigators weren't any closer to zeroing in on John, Partly because there wasn't much evidence left at each scene. And while police considered other suspects, Nothing panned out. Pressure to solve the case was building, so the authorities announced a $20,000 reward for information. Even though they received some tips, none of them pointed to John, and he knew it. If anything, he was emboldened. So he started finding new ways to enjoy all the terror. John started talking to his friends and co workers about the gruesome details published in the papers. Even though some people were bothered by it, John seemed to be doing the same thing as many others at the time, Fixating on each story out of fear or morbid curiosity. But sometimes he'd take it a step further. John would mention other gory details he claimed hadn't been released to the public, Saying he'd learned about it through his uncle who worked in law enforcement.
- [13:26]
Dr. Tristan Engels
This is controlled behavioral leakage, Meaning he's sharing accurate non public details about his own behavior, but pairing them with a plausible cover story that gives him deniability. And that's his uncle. That suggests that he's aware of the risk and he's actively managing it. But the question is why he do that at all. And again, that ties back to his need for involvement. Sharing those details allows him to remain psychologically engaged in the crime, which is a pattern we've already seen and we talked about at length in episode one. He's not just observing reactions of people anymore, though. He's now trying to elicit the reactions himself. It started with calling Marilyn's parents, and now this and because the information that he's giving is new and disturbing, that likely adds to the thrill. It also fits with that reinforcement cycle. The need for stimulation increases when it doesn't produce the same effect. And to get that, the behavior needs to evolve. John is seeking new ways to get that same intensity and control. And also, once again, he's boundary testing. He's gauging how close he can get to the truth without raising suspicion, which keeps building confidence in his ability to deceive others and avoid detection.
- [14:42]
Vanessa Richardson
John showed no fear of getting caught. And in April of 1969, less than a month after Marilyn's death, he sought out his next suspected victim. This time someone even younger. 13 year old Dawn Basum was a local middle school student. She lived across the street from a girl John used to date. Around 7pm on April 14, dawn was walking home from a friend's house who lived about a mile away from her. As she walked along some railroad tracks, John approached her and somehow he got her into his car. Then he drove to an abandoned farmhouse nearby. When they got there, dawn realized she was in serious danger and fought to get away. And at one point she did. But John quickly caught up and overpowered her. Then he removed her clothes, strangled her with an electrical wire, gagged her with a piece of cloth, and stabbed her multiple times. She was not sexually assaulted.
- [15:41]
Dr. Tristan Engels
The fact that he did not sexually assault Don illustrates that sexual assault is often not about sex. It's about power, control, and dominance, which is the pattern we've seen with John up to this point. We also have seen that he holds rigid expectations, particularly when it comes to women, or more accurately here, females, because Don is a child. So what changed? Why didn't he sexually assault her? Well, dawn fought back and even briefly escaped, and that shifts the dynamic. The situation moves from one where he is in control, as he expects and anticipates to be, to one where that control is threatened. And based on his pattern, when his expectations are disrupted, his response escalates. He likely did not anticipate that level of resistance, especially from a child. And that deviation likely triggered anger or rage. So instead of sexually assaulting her, he went straight into a brutal attack, which are all behaviors that reassert dominance and restore control. In this situation, I think he had to deviate because of unexpected circumstances and a threat to his controlled system.
- [16:50]
Vanessa Richardson
Do you think the fact that Don was so young might have disrupted John's internal script and changed how he acted in that moment?
- [16:58]
Dr. Tristan Engels
It's possible. I'm not sure. I think it's likely, though, when an offender chooses a victim that young, it's intentional. They are easy targets. Developmentally, they're easily influenced. They're trusting, and often they lack confidence asserting boundaries, especially with adults. And physically, they can't overpower someone John's size. John chose her for a reason, and statistically, it's likely because of her perceived vulnerability, her accessibility and desirability. And I think the only disruption in his internal script was the fact that she was a fighter who almost won. And that was something he didn't expect.
- [17:36]
Vanessa Richardson
Whatever John's reasons were, he was clearly just as intent to kill Don as all his previous victims. And once she was dead, John left her body on a wooded roadside out in the open enough to be easily found. He didn't return to move her body again because less than 24 hours later, a truck driver spotted her, just like John wanted. The familiar pattern kept playing out from there. And just like John's other victims, the M.E. determined that dawn had also been on her period at the time of her murder. But that wasn't the only connection to the previous murders, because when investigators surveyed the scene where Don's body was found, they found a gold earring that had belonged to Marilyn Skelton.
- [18:18]
Dr. Tristan Engels
This is reminiscent of the Golden State Killer, where items that were connected to prior victims of his were brought into new crime scenes of his. This also supports the presence of trophy behavior, which I actually suspected because he had the traits, but we didn't yet have confirmation of that.
- [18:35]
Vanessa Richardson
Authorities believe the killer was mocking them, and less than a month later, the ridicule continued when the abandoned farmhouse where Don had been killed was destroyed in a fire. After investigators arrived on the scene, they noticed four lilacs placed in a neat row along the driveway. The number of flowers matched the number of victims John had killed so far. The authorities later arrested an arsonist in connection with the fire, but that person wasn't John, which meant he was still on the loose. And as he grew more brazen, John embarked on his most depraved and vile act yet.
- [19:19]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Do you love your pets?
- [19:20]
Vanessa Richardson
Do you love suspense?
- [19:22]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Do you love it when your pets
- [19:23]
Vanessa Richardson
keep you in suspense because they ate something mysterious? And who knows what the vet visit will cost? If you answered yes twice and then no, you should protect your pet with Lemonade Pet Insurance. It can save you up to 90% on vet bills for checkups, emergencies, diagnostics, all the stuff that leaves you financially on the edge of your seat. Get a quick and Easy quote@lemonade.com pet and get your Suspense somewhere else. Like from a riveting podcast. There's never been a better time to get outside and experience the benefits of nature, discover nearby trails and explore the outdoors with alltrails. Download the free app today and find your outside. In April of 1969, 21 year old John Collins reportedly murdered his fourth and youngest victim, 13 year old Don Basem. Despite his increased violence and hubris, authorities were still no closer to catching him. John finished his junior year at Eastern Michigan University and headed into summer without missing a beat. On the surface, he looked like any other college kid ready for a much needed break. But John wasn't interested in taking time off to relax. By early June, it's believed he'd focused his attention on someone new, 21 year old Alice Calum, who'd recently graduated from the University of Michigan and was taking a few extra classes over the summer. And on the night of June 8, while Alice was walking home home from a friend's house, he abducted and attacked her. The next day, two teenage boys found Alice's body near another abandoned farmhouse. When police arrived at the scene, they once again noted the extreme violence that had taken place. Alice's stab wounds were so bad the officers could barely look at them. Soon, Alice's autopsy showed that she'd also been on her period. But there was one detail that set her murder apart from the others. Alice had been shot not once in the forehead.
- [21:23]
Dr. Tristan Engels
There's a shift in method here. Up until this point, John's behavior has been highly personal and his violence had been all hands on. His methods required that he be in close proximity and it allowed for him to have full control. But a gun creates distance and it's lethal and it doesn't require any physical interaction. So why use it and why use it now? And I think the timing's very significant because it happens after dawn nearly escapes. I think that suggests that he's refining and adapting after a near miss so that he can eliminate any future risk. But more importantly for John's psychology, he can anticipate future risk more accurately. That said, this isn't a full shift in his motive or his methods. The underlying pattern of control and domination and power are very much still present. It isn't unusual for serial offenders to refine their methods as they gain more experience or they gain more confidence. It's adaptation and we often see it as confidence grows.
- [22:24]
Vanessa Richardson
What do you make of the fact that Alice was shot once? Do you think this indicates that John wasn't really comfortable with using a gun? Or maybe the opposite?
- [22:32]
Dr. Tristan Engels
I Think it suggests that the gun served just a specific function. It wasn't really his preferred method. It was used once, like you said, but it was used alongside other equally lethal forms of violence. And I think that indicates it wasn't the primary expression of his control. It was just used for efficiency. It doesn't appear to be central to how he carries out his violence. We know that, especially from his past. Instead, I think it's likely a tool that he used in that moment, but his core pattern is still there. It's still the same. I would be curious to know if the use of the gun happened after he killed her through his other methods, because if so, that would be a significant form of dehumanization.
- [23:17]
Vanessa Richardson
The use of a gun initially threw investigators off, but ultimately they determined that Alice had been killed by the same person as the previous victim. Victims. Which meant the killer was escalating and so was the pressure to catch him. With five victims so far, public fear was at an all time high. The reward for information climbed to $42,000, which is well over $350,000 in today's money. More detectives were assigned to each case, and they interviewed more than 1,000 convicted sex offenders and followed up on hundreds of tips and. But nothing led them to John. It's also important to remember that investigators were working within the limits of the era. DNA databases weren't around in 1969, so even if the authorities had been able to collect and preserve any biological evidence, there was no system to run it against. Plus, John had no record anyway. The case seemed to be going nowhere fast. By July of 1969, the local community was so desperate for answers that they took matters into their own hands. And a self described hippie vigilante group called the Psychedelic Rangers enlisted the help of a psychic to create a profile of the killer. The psychic described the suspect as a strong white male under 25 years old, born outside of the United States, who rode a motorcycle. All traits that correctly matched John, who'd been born in Canada and started stealing motorcycle parts when he first got to college.
- [24:50]
Dr. Tristan Engels
When fear and desperation reach a certain level, especially in cases that are particularly brutal and unpredictable, it can cause collective panic. These crimes feel random, but they're also close to home and authorities have no leads. And people respond to uncertainty of not knowing who's next, when it will happen next, and how it can be prevented. Everything that they've been accustomed to relying on, like evidence and standard investigative processes, isn't working. So the natural and human instinct is to find anything that will offer hope. And a psychic can offer hope and the possibility of answers or direction. So turning to a psychic really reflects the emotional reality of these crimes in the community. It's a response to fear, lack of control, and a need for closure. And in this case, the psychic just so happened to be right.
- [25:43]
Vanessa Richardson
The same psychic also made one more prediction. They said that the killer would strike one final time. And just days later, he did. On July 23, 1969, 18 year old Karen Sue Binnaman, a student at EMU, entered a local wig shop. She browsed around a little before leaving the store and hopping onto the back of John's motorcycle. It seems like Karen believed they were on a date. John's aunt and uncle, who lived nearby, were out of town, so he took Karen to their house. When he got there, he forced Karen down into the basement. What followed next was the most brutal attack yet. John sexually assaulted Karen, strangled her and beat her severely. He stabbed her repeatedly and forced her to drink a corrosive liquid that caused extreme burns and internal damage. He also stuffed a cloth into her mouth mouth to silence her screams. When it was over, John drove Karen's body to a wooded area, then went back to his aunt and uncle's house to clean up the scene. Meanwhile, Karen was reported missing, and the authorities looked into the timeline of her final movements. The owner of the wig shop told police that she'd left the store with a young man on a motorcycle. But they weren't able to give a more detailed description of him other than the fact that he had dark hair. It wasn't a lot to go on. And three days later, Karen's body was discovered. Investigators were dumbfounded to learn that yet another victim had been menstruating when she died. And soon they uncovered another peculiar detail. The medical examiner found several short blonde hairs all over Karen's body. Karen had a short bob, but her hair was brown. So authorities believed the killer had somehow left the blonde hairs behind. But based on the description of the man Karen had been seen with, the hairs likely didn't belong to the killer himself. Detectives kept this piece of information in their back pockets while they continued strategizing. It was becoming more and more clear that if they wanted to catch the killer, then they'd have to think outside the box. That's when someone proposed a risky idea. It was no secret that the killer wanted each body to be found quickly and easily. In the past, he'd even gone back to move his victims bodies if they hadn't been discovered. His compulsive need to watch the fallout of his crimes was a key part of his M.O. and detectives believed they could use it against him. Even though they'd already spoken to a few witnesses in Karen's case, they only revealed that she was missing. Authorities concealed the fact that Karen had been killed, and they placed a mannequin in the exact spot where her body was found. Then they set up a stakeout and waited for the killer's inevitable return. On the night of July 27, an officer sat in his patrol car a distance away from where the mannequin lay. The area was completely dark and in the midst of a torrential downpour, so he struggled to maintain a good view of the spot. Then, just before midnight, the officer suddenly noticed the figure of a young man running away from the mannequin. Because of the poor conditions, the officer couldn't see until it was too late. The killer had taken the bait, but realized what was happening and escaped.
- [29:08]
Dr. Tristan Engels
With John's growing sense of confidence and impunity, realizing he was being set up by law enforcement would have been a very pivotal moment for him. This is his first real direct confrontation with risk, and it's not one that he could have been able to talk his way out of. So in that sense, it likely triggered genuine fear because for the first time, the possibility of being caught was very real to him. What happens after a near miss like this can vary. Some offenders become more cautious. They pull back. Reduced risk taking may even go into one of those cooling off periods that we talked about. Others, particularly those who are sensation seeking or whose behavior has already been reinforced by prior successes, can experience the opposite effect. Escaping becomes yet another form of reinforcement, because yet again, they just got away with it. That's another thrill. And I think for John, given what we know about him and his history, it's likely the latter.
- [30:10]
Vanessa Richardson
John had outsmarted and even taunted the authorities before. The officer knew he couldn't let him get away. But when he grabbed his radio to call for backup, he realized the heavy rainstorm had knocked out the signal. The call never went through, and the officer lost sight of John. Once again, John had slipped away. But it wouldn't stay that way for long because his desperate and uncontrollable need to kill would soon push him to make an irreversible mistake.
- [30:44]
National Debt Relief Advertiser
Do you have $10,000 or more in credit card debt? Maybe you're even barely getting by by making minimum payments. With credit card debt hitting record highs, national debt relief offers real debt relief solutions for people struggling to keep these options may reduce a large portion of credit card debt. For those who qualify, you don't need to declare bankruptcy and you may be able to pay back less than you owe regardless of your credit. National Debt Relief has already reduced the credit card debt for more than 550,000 consumers, so don't wait if you owe 10, 20, or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in credit card debt, you can now take advantage of this financial debt relief as the cost of living increases. To find out how much you could save, visit nationaldebtrelief.com that's nationaldebtrelief.com youm're listening
- [31:31]
Crime House Announcer
to this podcast, so I know you've got a curious mind. Here's a helpful fact you might not know yet. Drivers who switch and save with Progressive save over $900 on average. They make it super simple. Pop over to progressive.com, answer some questions and you'll get a quick quote with coverage options tailored to your choices. Plus you'll see which discounts you may qualify for, like the online quote discount or savings for paying in full. In fact, 99% of Progressive Auto customers earn at least one discount. See if you could save when you switch to Progressive. You'll feel good about making a savvy choice. Visit progressive.com and see if you can enjoy a little extra cash back. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates national average 12 month savings of $946 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2024 and May 2025. Potential savings will vary. Imagine you've been charged with a crime and the only witness pointing the finger at you isn't even human.
- [32:26]
Dr. Tristan Engels
I remember thinking, are you serious?
- [32:30]
Vanessa Richardson
What is this thing?
- [32:31]
Crime House Announcer
It's something artificial created by a mysterious Canadian and it's coming for all of us.
- [32:38]
Katie Ring
A life defining technology crime as we
- [32:42]
Crime House Announcer
know it will never be the same.
- [32:44]
Dr. Tristan Engels
I'm like, oh my God.
- [32:45]
Katie Ring
God he's lying.
- [32:46]
Crime House Announcer
From CBC's Uncover the Expert Witness, available now on CBC Listen or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [32:56]
Vanessa Richardson
By mid summer of 1969, 22 year old John Collins had just reportedly killed his alleged sixth victim, Karen Sue Binnamin. After Karen's body was discovered, police set up a stakeout at the scene where she'd been found. Unfortunately, even though John took the bait, he quickly realized it was a trap and escaped. Escaped without being identified. And the haunting thing is, he was already on their radar by this point. After Karen was reported missing, investigators spoke to employees at the shops surrounding the wig store where she'd been spotted before she disappeared and one of those employees told them something interesting. Just like the wig store owner, this person had seen Karen getting onto a motorcycle with a young man with dark hair. Except this witness recalled an important detail. The motorcycle was made by a manufacturer called Triumph, which stuck out because it wasn't as popular as other brands. This information caught the attention of a rookie officer who'd recently graduated from Eastern Michigan university because he knew someone who owned a Triumph motorcycle, A former fraternity brother named John Collins. When investigators showed John's photo to the wig shop owner and the other employee, both were adamant that he was the man they'd seen. So on July 25, an officer went to speak to John. During the conversation, John admitted that he'd been riding his motorcycle in the area that day, but that he didn't know Karen and had never interacted with her. Just like in the past, when Jon was questioned in relation to the murder of Joan Shell, he didn't get defensive. He just told a casual, plausible lie. Except this time, his plan didn't work. Police asked him to come in for further questioning and to take a lie detector test, but John refused. The next day, police announced to the press that Karen's body was discovered. The stakeout to find her killer didn't work, but thankfully, the police had a feeling John might be involved. Unwilling to let a suspect get away a second time time police formulated another plan. They knew John's uncle David was a state police officer. And when David and his wife returned from vacation on July 29, officers immediately informed them that John was a person of interest in Karen's murder. Just as they'd predicted, David didn't want to stand in the way of an investigation, so he told police that John had been watching their house while they were gone. He didn't try to hide hide the fact that John was in town when the murder occurred, but he was also unable to tell them anything more useful. However, after the officers thanked David and left, his wife noticed some strange things down in the basement, including bottles of ammonia, detergent, and black spray paint that had gone missing. David and his wife felt sick at the thought that their own nephew, who was like a son to them, might be guilty of something so heinous. But still, they wasted no time notifying detectives of what they discovered. Then they consented to a search of their home, and they were confronted with the most damning evidence yet. During the search, officers found small blood stains in the basement, which were later confirmed to match Karen's blood type. But that wasn't all. Scattered near the stains were Short blonde hair, hair clippings. When officers asked David about them, he reportedly explained that his wife often cut their children's hair in the basement. The clippings had come from them. Investigators rushed back to the station to compare those hair clippings to the ones that had been found on Karen's body, and they were a match.
- [36:38]
Dr. Tristan Engels
When it comes to John, I think what matters most about the environment is that it's a controlled one. The abandoned homes and the outdoor areas, they were secluded. They offered privacy, and they allowed him total control over his victims. And he needed that to carry out every step of his MO uninterrupted, because that way, it could be carried out as he expected and anticipated. His uncle's house is an extension of that, only it's more familiar to him. Having personal familiarity means feeling completely in control of the environment. It can also be argued that this is riskier, too, because it's personally linked to him. Him, he will be leaving behind evidence that he has to be very careful to conceal. But again, that's part of his broader pattern. The more confident he gets, the more his sense of impunity grows and the more he feels he can manage the risk. Doing this at his uncle's house is risky, but it's also thrilling to him.
- [37:40]
Vanessa Richardson
John's overconfidence had caused him to make a crucial mistake. The hair clipping served as strong enough evidence for police to officially arrest and charge charge him for Karen Binnamin's murder. John Collins was now behind bars, but he refused to confess to Karen's murder. Even when confronted with the evidence, he swore he had nothing to do with it. Investigators weren't buying it, and now that he was off the streets and unable to hurt anyone else, they tried to connect him to the other five murders. They felt certain that John had committed those murders as well. Since the end, MOs were basically identical. Unfortunately, this was hard to prove. Investigators found no evidence in John's apartment, which was frustrating to police and the victim's families, especially because John's roommate told police he'd seen John throwing out a box just days before his arrest. And the box looked like it was filled with women's belongings. But with those items long gone, there was nothing concrete to tie John to the other other crimes. So on August 1, 1969, John was formally arraigned for only Karen's murder. Police just couldn't tie him to the other victims, but law enforcement elsewhere in the country thought they could. As Karen's case started to unfold, authorities all the way in Northern California reached out, believing that John might be connected to a seventh murder. As it turned out, a 17 year old girl named Roxy Phillips had been killed that past June in a way that closely mirrored the violence seen in Karen's case and John's other alleged victims. Roxy had been strangled to death and stripped of all her clothes, which were never found. Her body was found partially buried in a wooded area. As investigators started piecing together John's movements, they realized something big. He had taken a trip to Northern California. At the time of Roxy's death death, he'd gone with a friend to visit John's mom and stepdad. The authorities confirmed this through rental car records in John's name. He'd rented a camper for the road trip. And when police tracked it down, they discovered that it had been cleaned spotless, which meant any evidence John may have left behind was long gone. Detectives couldn't help but think that Jon had done that intentionally. And their suspicion only grew when they spoke to Roxy's friend, who said she'd introduced her to a man she referred to as John from Michigan.
- [40:10]
Dr. Tristan Engels
This wouldn't be surprising because it's not unusual for serial offenders to vary the locations of their crimes, especially over time. There are a few reasons for that. Early on, some offenders are still figuring out what works for them. They may experiment with different environments to see where they feel most in control or least likely to be interrupted. And as their confidence grows, they may also become more willing to take risks or expand beyond familiar areas, especially when they've been successful. Like we've seen with John, location can also shift because of practical factors like access, opportunity or changes in routine. Or they move. Sometimes the location is 15 minutes away. Sometimes it's in a different state. Another practical reason is to avoid detection. The more they spread out the crimes, the more random they appear to law enforcement, making it harder to connect them to one another. But it still boils down to choosing locations that offer the most amount of control for them. Where they feel dominant, confident, and able to manage the the situation the best.
- [41:15]
Vanessa Richardson
Despite the strong possibility that John was to blame for Roxy's death, the evidence against him was entirely circumstantial. Plus, the issue of jurisdiction would have made it difficult to bring charges against him anyway. So the focus stayed on Karen Binnamin. John's defense tried to have the case dismissed based on the fact the police didn't have a proper warrant to search his apartment. But their efforts were invented vain. The case would move forward. John entered a not guilty plea and his trial began on June 2, 1970. In the courtroom, his mother stood firmly by his side, Refusing to believe he was capable of any of it. She even went so far as to mortgage her own home so she could pay for John's attorney. But in the end, it didn't matter. The physical evidence was enough to convince the jury to find John guilty of Karen's murder. Murder. John showed no emotion when he heard the verdict or when the judge sentenced him to life in prison. But he continued to maintain his innocence, Although his team was never able to get his conviction overturned. In 1980, after 10 years behind bars, John made another attempt at freedom. He requested to be transferred to a Canadian prison. Because he held Canadian citizenship, It meant he would have been eligible. Eligible for parole after just nine years. The request was initially approved, but once the public caught wind of it, the backlash was so strong, the courts reversed their decision. John would stay where he was. As of this recording, John remains behind bars and spends his days writing letters to female pen pals. He continues to present himself as a man wrongfully incarcerated, Never admitting the truth and never acknowledging all the lives he took so many years ago. But despite John's claims, many people feel certain he committed each of the heinous crimes he was suspected of. And this belief has given rise to some troubling theories Surrounding John's true motive. John's own cousin has expressed publicly that he believes John killed innocent women as a way to take his anger out on his mother. If you remember from part one, John's mother had multiple relationships with abusive men, all of whom gravely harmed John when he was just a child. Based on that, John's cousin and many others have been unable to ignore the fact that each of his alleged victims were petite brunettes, just like his mother.
- [43:45]
Dr. Tristan Engels
That's a theory that makes sense on the surface, and it's not a new one. I mean, for example, it was theorized that Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper did the same, Though Kemper explicitly did say so. Ted. Ted, however, had clear evidence of this. John's profile is different, though. Yes, he did grow up in a chaotic, abusive environment, and a big part of that was watching his mother repeatedly enter relationships where he was harmed and, from his perspective, not protected. And that can be traumatic and confusing for a child. And we talked about that at great length in episode one, and I think it likely shaped how he understood relationships, trust, and what he believes women's roles are are. If what he repeatedly saw was dominant abusive men in a more passive or constrained mother, that can teach him that Relationships should feel imbalanced and that they're about power and control rather than safety. And I do think those early experiences influenced how he later viewed women and relationships and created very rigid views and expectations surrounding that. That said, I think the fact that his victims may have resembled his mother was more likely due to circumstance or familiarity. Meaning, even if he's not aware of it, he was likely drawn to women who looked similar to what he's used to. It doesn't mean he's thinking, wow, she reminds me of my mother. I wanna displace my rage under her. It's more that his brain is used to that type of person or maybe attracted to that type of person, so those aren't the people he notices and focuses on. We don't see a very specific repeated pattern of selection that stands out beyond his, which is largely a college campus and that is a saturated environment with overlap in demographics. His mom was not somebody who represented a college woman. And we don't have direct evidence like statements, writings, or behaviors showing that he connected his victims to his mother. So is it probable? Sure, definitely. But I would need to see more to say definitively if that theory holds up for him.
- [45:54]
Vanessa Richardson
It seems like John Collins intends to take his secrets to the grave. But despite his lifelong need for control, he's proven to be unable to maintain control of his own narrative. The vast majority of people involved in the case believe he killed all seven victims, and there's nothing he can do to change that. And for the victims, Mary, Joan, Marilyn, Dawn, Alice, Karen, and Roxy, their stories and memories live on through their loved ones. Thanks so much for listening. Come back next time for a deep dive. Dive into the mind of another murderer. Thanks so much to Katie Ring for joining. But before we get out of here, Katie, Dr. Engels and I can't wait to get your thoughts on this case.
- [46:53]
Katie Ring
I have a lot of thoughts and questions on this case. I think While we have Dr. Angles here, one of my number one questions I always ask myself, especially with serial killers, is the nature versus nurture question. And especially with people like John Collins who come from an abusive background. Sometimes I ask myself, myself if there's anything genetic, something that came from his father who was also abuser, or if it's pretty much all, you know, in the environment that he was raised in.
- [47:26]
Dr. Tristan Engels
That's a really common question, and it's something that a lot of researchers have been studying for decades. And when people ask that question, it's really not one or the other, but it's both things that are Often working together. Some individuals have underlying traits, like John, for example. He's got impulsivity and he's got poor emotional response, especially to others, poor regulation skills. And there are others who have structural abnormalities in the brain where there are different gray matter, different sizes in different areas of the brain that affect how they respond to things, affect impulse control, early experiences. Like you said, there's something with research where we've noticed that trauma is a very common factor with serial offending and abuse. Instability or lack of protection are things that shape how those traits can develop over time. Especially if there are no supportive factors, no intervention, no resiliency, no coping skills. Those all really do affect how all of those traits are influenced and developed. So it's not as simple as they're always just born this way way. Because you see a lot of children who are born in traumatic households, who are raised in households just like John's, for example, and they don't always develop and become violent offenders. And there's a big myth around. Abused people go on to abuse others. That's a huge myth. There are millions and millions of children who have been abused who have never, ever wanted to harm another person and have never, ever harmed another person, let alone an animal or an insect that is a man. Myth one that I am very active about dispelling any chance I get. But it's the interaction between what's going on biologically, genetically, and what's going on environmentally, and how those things work together and the interaction of those. You can have a predisposition, but with reinforcement of certain things and the right conditions, those things can escalate or. Or with proper stability, proper intervention, they may never escalate. And on the flip side, not everyone who experiences trauma, like I said, they don't develop any of those behaviors at all. So I think a more accurate way to understand it is this. These patterns tend to emerge when there's underlying vulnerabilities that get reinforced over time rather than corrected. And that's the same with any predisposition, like even just mental illness. You might be predisposed to having anxiety, you might be predisposed to having schizophrenia, you might be predisposed to having depression. But it's your environment that can really bring those things out. Or it can help you to cope with those things, and it can help you to stabilize those things.
- [50:13]
Katie Ring
Yeah, that's why I always ask, because there are so many people who grew up in abusive households who have decided that they were going to do the opposite with their life and have kids and Build healthy families and not bring upon that generational trauma.
- [50:26]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Yes.
- [50:27]
Katie Ring
And so sometimes I'm like, is there just something really, really, you know. Yeah, if they're really predisposed to that, or if he, you know, maybe moved in with his aunt and uncle earlier.
- [50:38]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Right, right.
- [50:39]
Katie Ring
Maybe that could have changed the direction of his life.
- [50:42]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Exactly. I mean, I never really know. I worked with a lot of violent offenders who. And one of the group topics that I taught them was the cycle of violence. And I taught them how it's learned. I taught them how it's taught intergenerational. And when they started to really learn that and it started to really, you know, crystallize and they started to internalize that they were. They were able to locate in their own life where it started, how it was passed down, how it was modeled, how it was emulated, and where to break it. And so that's when you really start to see meaningful change, is when you understand that and you understand other ways of communicating, other ways of showing, hey, I don't. I'm up, upset. This doesn't have to be communicated this way. I can communicate it in a different way. There's a lot of that. And so really, it's about, like you said, breaking the cycle, breaking intergenerational, you know, trauma. And it can be done. You just have to have that perspective. You have to have the resiliency, the coping skills, the support, the desire. The desire. That's another one, too. And temperament's a big, big one as well, if you have the right temperament there too. So, yeah, it can be done.
- [51:58]
Katie Ring
Yeah. I feel like one of the biggest things, especially for male serial killers, is having that mother wound. And what are your thoughts on the power of that? And on another hand, what I see is that so many men grow up, especially men whose fathers leave, they end up blaming their moms for them leaving where they were really just abandoned. But in this case, she did get from one abusive relationship to another to another. And again, the blame's not always on the victim.
- [52:38]
Vanessa Richardson
There.
- [52:38]
Katie Ring
There was obviously something probably going on with his mother that was.
- [52:42]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Yeah, I think there's more to it, I'm sure, than we know. Obviously, with the research we have, it's limited. We're not in John's shoes. John, from what I understand, too, hasn't really been open and talkative about any of this. He still maintains his innocence. He doesn't elicit a lot of information about his past at all. So really, the source of understanding this to the, like, the root comes from him. But he's not a credible source right now. So that mother wound that you're talking about. Mothers are often seen, especially in society, as the nurture, right? So when a father's abandoned a family and the mother is there, the mother is doing the best that they can. They really. I mean, it's a hard job. They're doing it on their own, and that's really difficult. They have to take the burden of that. And unfortunately, because of, you know, just societal demands on a woman and as a mother, it's on them to pick up the absence of that father. That's the pressure that's put on them. Them. They're. They're. They're being the mother and the father at the same time. And a child, unfortunately, projects a lot of that blame and displaces a lot of that anger onto that parent rather than the absent parent. And it's just. It's a. It's a reality that happens. And unfortunately, without intervention, without additional support and resilience, that narrative doesn't get corrected. And unless that's there there often. But as they age and as they start to developmentally and cognitively understand what's truly happening, because remember, he's really young. He doesn't understand what's going on. He doesn't understand the demands, financially, physically, emotionally, of one parent taking on the role of two, trying to support a family, trying to support a child, trying to find another father for that child, maybe. I mean, if we call it. John's mom was a teenager, I think she was. What was she, 14 or something? 14.
- [54:42]
Vanessa Richardson
I think she was 14, yeah.
- [54:43]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Or so when she had him. She was also developmentally far too young to understand what she was doing, if we're being honest. So there's that also. There's a whole lot there. So when they get to a developmental age where they can fully understand the situation, I think that's when they can reel in that anger. They can resolve that anger. They can cope with it a little better, understand it a little better. And generally, the relationship with their mother gets much healthier over time.
- [55:17]
Katie Ring
Something I saw in an interview with the sheriff that happened just more recently. It was 30. 30 years after he was arrested. And he said that part of his quote, unquote, mother problems was because she was a prostitute and that he caught her with men. Do you think that changes anything in that relationship? That could have.
- [55:43]
Dr. Tristan Engels
I mean, that's. That is traumatic for a child to witness your parent or parents, you know, having sexual relations, especially with multiple different partners, and especially if Those partners are not partners that feel safe. And he has a history of being around men that have been and brought in his. What should be a safe environment for him that were not safe for him. So that is a traumatic experience. And that can materially change how he views relationships, especially between men and women and how he views power dynamics. If you. Especially if, let's say mom was a sex worker and she was working for somebody who controlled her as a sex worker, that also adds to a control dynamic and a control framework in relationships. And he's a child witnessing that. That's very, very influential and very powerful. So that could add to very rigid, rigid beliefs that we talked about in the episodes regarding his views on relationships with women. In particular, how women should be treated in relationships, how what expectations he has of women and certainly his own insecurities in those relationships with women and how he needs to be in control in those relationships. Yeah, definitely.
- [56:57]
Vanessa Richardson
And it reminds me of what he did to his sister when he found his sister with another man. She just got married and had a baby and then she was with some other guy and he snapped. There's so much anger there inside. And that could have been from. Especially if he saw his mom with different men.
- [57:11]
Dr. Tristan Engels
And yeah, it threatened the stability and the security and the expectations that he had about what a family should look like and what felt safe for him. Him. I say that loosely, obviously, because he's not safe person by any means. But yeah, definitely it threatened the rigid beliefs and anticipation and expectations he had.
- [57:33]
Katie Ring
One of the second questions I have is about the menstrual cycles because I find it so weird. I don't know if all the autopsies mention it exactly. The sheriff definitely said that they were all on their menstrual cycles. And my thought is just either did he sexually assault so many women and then it just happened that these women were on their menstrual cycles at the time or was he stalking these women and finding out when their cycles were. It's just like. It's wild to me that there was something, a common thread like that.
- [58:07]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Exactly. My thinking is that's the only way for him to have like, for me to believe that he was intentionally choosing his victim because they were menstruating. I would need to see clear evidence that he was like surveillance stalking them and maybe even some life invasion where he's seeing, Going into their home and seeing. Yeah, going through their garbage, seeing when their cycles are and literally tracking it to know. I think it's more likely than not that it Just was happenstance. Because if you really were to break it down in, know, like doing math and statistics, one in five or six is the possibility that a woman would be menstruating when he would go to assault them. That's, you know, not out of the realm of probability.
- [58:55]
Katie Ring
Yeah.
- [58:55]
Dr. Tristan Engels
So it's likely coincidence. And it might have been discovered upon the assault and added to the rage in the moment. Because his assaults were arguably overkill. I mean, he assaulted them and killed them in ways that were beyond what was necessary to be lethal. So it could have been that. But, yeah, I would need to see clear evidence that he knew that and how, because especially back then, it's not like he could, like, track their cycle through an app, you know, I just don't. I don't know. I know truly true. Or they're like, is he breaking in and seeing their birth control and going that way? Like, I would need to see clear evidence of that. And the only way we would know that is if they found evidence of that in their investigative process. Or John himself said so, but he's, again, to this day, claiming innocence.
- [59:47]
Katie Ring
So the sheriff also said something weird. He said that a lady came in, and she said that she had gone on a date with him, and he dropped her off. And she was like, no, sorry, I have to go. You know, I have to finish some school work. And he's like, are you sure? Like, let's just go on a drive. And she's like, no, I absolutely can't go. And then he said, are you menstruating? She's like, what? She's like, how did you know?
- [60:13]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Yeah.
- [60:13]
Katie Ring
And he was like, I can smell it.
- [60:15]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Wow. So I think. I think it's more likely than not that that was. Oh, you're rejecting me. This must be the reason, right?
- [60:22]
Vanessa Richardson
Yeah.
- [60:23]
Dr. Tristan Engels
This must be why you're rejecting me. Because look at me. I'm socially loved here on campus. I'm. I'm. I'm attracted. I'm all American college boy.
- [60:32]
Vanessa Richardson
Right.
- [60:33]
Dr. Tristan Engels
The only reason you'd say no to me in getting in the car with me, because, again, his expectations are very rigid. His anticipation is very rigid. The only way you're gonna say no to me is if you're menstruating.
- [60:44]
Katie Ring
Right.
- [60:45]
Dr. Tristan Engels
So, like that. I think that's more likely in that situation. Only John would know.
- [60:49]
Katie Ring
John, would you talk, please?
- [60:50]
Vanessa Richardson
Would you please tell us?
- [60:51]
Dr. Tristan Engels
John, we need answers.
- [60:53]
Katie Ring
Pretty sure almost every one of his victims was in a relationship.
- [60:57]
Dr. Tristan Engels
We talked about that all throughout. I found that very interesting too. I think he had to have known that because he'd been eyeing them for a while. There's no way he didn't know that. And I think that also was like part of his victim selection. You're in a relationship, but why are you hanging out on college campus with all these people and not your boyfriend? It's going against my rigid beliefs. And so I'm like, maybe that's part of why I'm targeting you. I mean, it's possible to. It's very possible. Yeah.
- [61:24]
Vanessa Richardson
We could talk about this for hours. Katie, any thoughts from a self defense perspective here? How would you go about protecting yourself in case you end up in a dangerous situation? I mean, people, people on college campuses, people just in life dating.
- [61:37]
Dr. Tristan Engels
We have a lot of women listeners too who would love to know this.
- [61:40]
Katie Ring
I feel like the biggest thing is that unfortunately, as humans, we tend to not be as suspicious as people of people we are attracted to, people we feel like are clean cut. And so I think it's just unfortunately, you know, you, you can't judge a book by its cover. Someone, a lot of times the biggest narcissists and abusers are actually very attractive people. And you know, there are, you never know. And I would never blame a victim because these guys are master manipulators and hide completely who they are. But there's simple things. And I think, you know, back in those days it wasn't as stigmatized, but like never. No one nowadays is getting in a random man's car accepting her ride.
- [62:26]
Dr. Tristan Engels
I would hope not. So yes, I mean, we do get into Ubers. I mean, that was something that freaked me out when it came out.
- [62:31]
Katie Ring
But yeah, that is true. But yeah, I think definitely not accepting rides for anyone from anyone, definitely. And just kind of doing a thorough check on the people, you know, you welcome into your life. Although again, a lot of people are wolfs and sheep's clothing. But I think the best thing you can do is just be hyper aware of your surroundings.
- [62:56]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Yeah, situational awareness was something I learned working in. Correct. I've taken that with me everywhere I go. I'm always scanning my environment.
- [63:04]
Katie Ring
And people, a lot of women especially have this feeling that the person who's most likely to harm you is the random stranger, the stranger danger.
- [63:13]
Dr. Tristan Engels
The stranger danger is not.
- [63:14]
Katie Ring
And it's not. It's always 90% of the time someone you know, whether that's many times it's someone you are in a relationship, have been in a relationship, or someone in these cases who just lives near you and has, has been maybe stalking you or keeping tabs on you.
- [63:30]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Definitely.
- [63:31]
Vanessa Richardson
Oh my gosh, Katie, thank you so
- [63:33]
Katie Ring
much for being here. We want to hear you guys.
- [63:35]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Yes.
- [63:36]
Katie Ring
And I could talk to you guys for hours.
- [63:37]
Dr. Tristan Engels
I know, I know. We got to do it again.
- [63:39]
Vanessa Richardson
Yeah, we really do. And everyone please remember to subscribe and follow America's most infamous crimes for more of Katie's insight.
- [63:47]
Dr. Tristan Engels
Serial Killers and Murderous Minds is a Crime House original. Powered by Paves Studios. Here at Crime House, we want to thank each and every one of you for your support. If you like what you heard today, reach out on Instagram at Crime House. And don't forget to rate, review and follow Serial Killers and Murderous Minds wherever you get your podcasts. Your feedback truly makes a difference and
- [64:08]
Vanessa Richardson
to enhance your listening experience, subscribe to Crime House plus on Apple Podcasts. You'll get every episode of Serial Killers and Murderous Minds ad free along with early access to each thrilling two part series. Serial Killers and Murderous Minds is hosted by me, Vanessa Richardson and forensic psychologist Dr. Tristan Engels and is a Crime House original. Powered by Pave Studios. This episode was brought to life by the Serial Killers and Murderous Minds team. Max Cutler, Ron Shapiro, Alex Alex Benedon, Lori Marinelli, Natalie Pertzovsky, Alyssa Fox, Sarah Batchelor, Markie Lee, Sarah Tardif and Carrie Murphy. Thank you for listening.
- [64:58]
Dr. Tristan Engels
When it's time to scale your business, it's time for Shopify. Get everything you need to grow the way you want. Like all the way. Stack more sales with the best converting checkout on the planet. Track your cha chings from every channel right in one spot and turn real time reporting into big time opportunities. Take your business to a whole new level. Switch to Shopify. Start your free trial today.
- [65:28]
Vanessa Richardson
Looking for your next listen? Check out hidden history with Dr. Harini Bot every Monday. Dr. Bhatt goes where history gets mysterious vanished civilizations, doomsday prophecies and events that science still can't fully explain. Follow Hidden History now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen.