
John Mark Comer and New Testament scholar Scot McKnight take issue with how the gospel is often articulated in evangelical circles. Michael Horton responds to these concerns and critiques and gives his own assessment of what they call the "King Jesus...
Loading summary
Sola Media Announcer
One of the most mysterious and oftentimes misunderstood claims in the Bible is that spiritual beings such as angels, demons and Satan are real. But discussions around spiritual beings are often speculative and filled with images from pop culture. Sola Media's booklet the War We Can't See is a short, 70 page resource that clearly examines Scripture's teaching on Satan, demons and spiritual warfare. It even includes an FAQ section highlighting questions such as who were the Nephilim? Can the devil read our thoughts? Do we have guardian angels? Download your free digital copy today@solarmedia.org offers.
Host/Interviewer
You've probably heard of John Mark Comer. He's a former pastor from Portland, Oregon, and he's the author of some very popular Christian books. He's particularly influenced among Gen Z. Across Christian college campuses, students are devouring his work. Professor Brad east writes, my students appear not only to be reading him, but to be reading no one else. Once it was Lewis and Chesterton, then Schaeffer and Stott and Packer, then Piper and Keller. Now it's Comer's world and we're all just living in it. Comer also has some criticisms of the Gospel centered movement and of the Reformed tradition in particular, and we'll be listening to some of those criticisms as we go along. It's also stated that he's greatly influenced by New Testament scholar Scott McKnight. I know Scott, and we recently just contributed to a book together called Five Views on the Gospel. We're going to take a look at some of what Scott says in this episode as well.
Guest Speaker 1
I also think that, you know, tragically many people have been in American churches for decades and have never really been well taught in a robust kingdom view of the Gospel. Like, one of the really sad things I hear a lot is people will come up to me in particular when I travel and say, hey, I've been listening to your teaching around discipleship, apprenticeship to Jesus, formation, whatever. I've been a Christian for 20 years, 25 years, 35 years. I have never heard anybody talk about this before.
Host/Interviewer
What a tragedy, mate.
Guest Speaker 1
And what I'm talking about is basic stuff. This is what the word disciple means. This is what it means to disciple under Jesus.
Host/Interviewer
Feels rudimentary and elementary to you.
Guest Speaker 2
This is how you follow Jesus.
Guest Speaker 1
Kingdom of God, the Gospel of the Kingdom. This is basic cursory reading of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John stuff. People in good solid bible churches for 30 years and this is new information to them. So don't underestimate the power of just preaching discipleship to Jesus.
Host/Interviewer
Definitely went to different Churches, I guess, because I heard discipleship all the time. There were books on discipleship. Dallas Willard's books were devoured. Not only Willard, but many other writers were engaging this topic of discipleship. Essentially, a disciple is a follower. There were disciples of various rabbis who would not only sit and listen, but would follow the rabbi to see how the rabbi actually applied the teachings that were given. And people followed Jesus even when they didn't quite understand who he was or what his mission was. The disciples followed him anyway, knowing that he had the words of eternal life. But see, that's just it. They followed him because they knew he had the words of eternal life. As Peter said in John 6, these are hard teachings and who can listen to them? But we know that you're the Holy One of God who has the words of eternal life. And so it's not just following Jesus example, it is listening to Jesus tell us who he is and what he's come to do. Discipleship entails learning not just by watching and by following an example, but by hearing the words of eternal life from the Messiah himself.
Guest Speaker 2
Today we kick off an eight week summer practice of preaching the gospel. Not a year late, but just the right time. Come on, you know it. I'm not a Calvinist, but maybe I am right now, I don't know. Now, to start with the rest of our time this morning, we need to ask a very simple question for the next kind of just to open this teaching series. And that is, what is the gospel? Now that may sound like a stupid question to you. You may be thinking, what do you like? Don't waste my time on that. I know what the gospel is. But if I were to go around the room with a MIC and have 10 different people here stand up and say, hey, articulate the gospel to me in 30 seconds, I would likely get 10 different summaries. Not wildly different, but kind of sort of different. Is the gospel that Jesus died on the cross for my sins so that I can go to heaven when I die? Is it the gospel that Jesus can do it but you can't and so put your faith in him? Is it Jesus come to dismantle the hierarchy of oppression? Is it Jesus came to make you healthy, wealthy? I mean, what is the gospel? Well, the best place to start with that is what is the gospel that Jesus himself preached? If we don't start with the gospel that Jesus preached, we may very well end up with a gospel that Jesus did not preach. New Testament scholar Scott McKnight in his excellent book, the King Jesus Gospel Makes a very simple point that blew my mind. He writes, quote, the Gospels are the gospel. This is what they pay me the big bucks for. This is why I went to seminary right here. Meaning the entire story, open in your lap, from Mark, chapter one, verse one, all the way to the end, the last paragraph, all of it is the gospel.
Host/Interviewer
This is a really important point because on one hand you can agree, on the other hand, disagree, depending on what you mean by gospel. There's a very good reason why, historically, churches of the Reformation have distinguished between the gospel in the broader sense and the gospel in the narrower sense. Yes, certainly the whole point of the evangelists is to evangelize. The whole point of the four gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, is to proclaim Christ as the savior of the world. But not everything in the four gospels is gospel. For example, Jesus summarizes the law by saying, love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength, and your neighbor as yourself. Jesus gives myriad commands. The Sermon on the Mount is chock full of commands. Jesus gave commands throughout his whole ministry. That's not the gospel in the narrower sense. In other words, it's in the Gospels, but it's not the good news of who Jesus is and that he has come to save us. In fact, much of what Jesus says is law, as I said, is command. That is meant to show us our hearts, to expose our motives, to demonstrate to us that we haven't kept it so that we will look to him for salvation.
Guest Speaker 2
This is simple but revolutionary. It means the gospel is likely much bigger and deeper and longer than many of us were led to believe.
Scott McKnight
And.
Guest Speaker 2
And it could be even a little bit different. I regularly get asked, john, Mark, why don't you preach the gospel?
Host/Interviewer
Well, if you often get asked, john, Mark, why don't you preach the gospel? That may be sort of a problem. Because if the gospel is discipleship, then essentially the gospel is law. The gospel is command. The gospel is something we do, not the good news of what Christ has done for us.
Guest Speaker 2
And that I'm happy to admit that's a weakness in my preaching. But when I press on people, what most people mean by that is, why don't you preach a Calvinistic view of the atonement?
Host/Interviewer
Okay, there's no Calvinistic view of the atonement. There is a classical Christian doctrine of the atonement. Perhaps what he means is substitutionary atonement. Jesus dying for our sins and being raised for our justification. And that is hardly a minor point in the gospels.
Guest Speaker 2
Or why don't you end your sermons with an appeal to put your hand up and go to heaven when you die.
Host/Interviewer
Yeah, that's not in the Gospels.
Guest Speaker 2
But my understanding of the gospel is anytime I preach Jesus, anytime I announce anything about Jesus, his birth, his death, his incarnation, his teachings, his miracles, his parables, his resurrection, his ascension to the right hand of the Father, the coming of the Holy Spirit, the great tradition of discipleship thousands of years old in his name, I am preaching the Gospel of Jesus.
Host/Interviewer
No, what you're preaching is following Jesus. The Gospel is the basis for our following Jesus. Remember what Paul says in Romans 12, in view of God's mercies, which he's been talking about for the rest, the earlier chapters, in view of all this that God has done for us, present your bodies as a living sacrifice. That's really what discipleship is, presenting our bodies as a living sacrifice, following Jesus Christ, in fact, including following Jesus example, following Jesus commands. But that's not the Gospel. I can't follow Jesus well enough to be assured that I'm included in God's family. I can only know that I belong to God in Christ because he saved me, because of what he's done, not because of how well I've followed.
Guest Speaker 2
And if you search for some of the most popular summaries of the Gospel in the American church, such as what Dr. Gary Beshears calls the John 3:16 gospel, which is basically, you're a sinner going to hell, but Jesus died on the cross for your sins so that you can go to heaven when you die. If you search for that in the Gospel in front of you, the Gospel in front of you, you are hard pressed to find anything remotely close to that in any of the four gospels of Jesus.
Host/Interviewer
He's quoted John 3:16 in the gospel, the fourth gospel. So clearly one can't say that there's nothing remotely close to that in the Gospels. In fact, John says the whole purpose of his Gospel is so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ and in believing, have life through his name. Now let's review some of what Scott McKnight has to say. This is from a panel that we did together recently for Zondervan for our book that we did together. What is the Gospel?
Scott McKnight
I wanted to know why the first four books of the New Testament are called the Gospel. And I believe that they are called the Gospel. A gospel, because they are the Gospel. And this led me to my major conclusion that 1 Corinthians 15 is fleshed out in the Gospel sermons of the Book of Acts and The Gospels flesh out the gospel sermons in the Book of Acts. They fill the lines in so that the gospel is the story about Jesus Christ. It is not in that sense. I would pose justification or justice or Jesus.
Host/Interviewer
See, this is a false dichotomy. I like Scott McKnight a lot, and I've learned a lot from him. He's so good in pointing out that the gospel is about Jesus. It's not about extraneous things. It's about Jesus. But what do you mean the gospel is about Jesus? Scott says that the gospel, the good news, is that Jesus is king, the king Jesus gospel. But that really is ambiguous news to me in my sinful condition. Jesus is king. The king has come. Well, has he come in judgment? Is this the last judgment? John the Baptist thought that it was. Is it that finally God is going to come in his righteous wrath and. And judge everybody on the basis of works? What does it mean for Christ to be king? That's what kings usually do when they take their throne. Well, no, if we follow the story of Jesus, he has delayed the final judgment so that he can be the king who dies on a cross. This is the king on a cross suffering for his people, not sending them into battle to spill their blood for his realm, but Jesus giving his life for his realm. And this is what you can't separate. Forgiveness of sins, justification, new birth, sanctification, glorification. You can't separate these things from the story of Jesus because this is what Jesus himself proclaimed. How many times did Jesus say.
Scott McKnight
That.
Host/Interviewer
The kingdom is not something we build, but something he builds? I will build the church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it. I will build my church. It's my church and I will build it, he told his disciples. Fear not. Don't be afraid of the world. I've overcome the world. It is the Father's good pleasure to give you a kingdom. The Great Commission. All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore, go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them and teaching them everything that I've commanded you. And then finally, in the Book of Hebrews, we're told that we are receiving a kingdom. It's not a kingdom that you know. Jesus came to give us a blueprint for how we should bring the kingdom into existence. Rather, it's something that he's giving to us. It's a gift. It's inseparable from the gift of salvation.
Scott McKnight
I don't mean these as dichotomies that cannot be incorporated into one another. I think that the gospel is the story about Jesus that fulfills Israel's story.
Host/Interviewer
Yeah, that's exactly it. It fulfills Israel's story, including the sacrificial system laid out in the law, very detailed, and all of them pointing like mirrors directed at the fulfillment in Jesus Christ. So whatever the Jesus story is, it has to fulfill the story of Israel, including the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.
Scott McKnight
It is a declaration that Jesus has arrived, that he has lived and taught. He embodied the gospel. He died for our sins. He was raised, he ascended, he's returning again. And this is the Jesus of the gospel.
Host/Interviewer
This is what I like about Scott's approach. He emphasizes that the gospel is Jesus. The announcement of Jesus, birth, incarnation, life of obedience to the Father, his death on a cross for our sins, his resurrection for our justification. You know, John Murray, in his famous book titles, it Redemption accomplished and Applied. There is no dichotomy here. Redemption was accomplished by Christ. These events that, that he talks about, Scott talks about here, but it's applied to us as well. He was not only crucified, but he was crucified for our sins. He was not only raised, but he was raised for our justification. So Scott says, you can't really separate these things. But it seems to me that he almost does and says that really the gospel is not justification and the forgiveness of sins. The gospel is the life of Jesus and what Jesus taught. But what Jesus taught and what Jesus embodied, what Jesus accomplished included very much the justification of the ungodly and the forgiveness of sins.
Scott McKnight
When I first framed the gospel as talking about Jesus, immediately people kept asking me, what about forgiveness? What about justification? What about redemption? What about this? What about. And I. And I said, I think we have to distinguish between the benefits of the gospel and the gospel itself. And it's not that you can have one without the other. It's that there is a distinction that is made in the pages of the New Testament. And one of my formulas that will be acceptable to theologians because they like formulaic language that has a little bit of heft to it, is I believe that Christology proceeds soteriology in the framing of the gospel.
Host/Interviewer
This is another point that I really appreciate about, about Scott's perspective. Could not agree more. Christology comes before soteriology. We have to know who Christ is in order to know the significance of what he accomplished. It's more back and forth, it's more bound up, more dialectical than this comes first and that comes first. Think of Athanasius in his great book on the Incarnation. In that book, this marvelous church father says that Christ is the sort of savior that we need. He had to be fully God because only God can save us. But he had to be fully human because it was humans who owed the debt. It was humans who were under the curse. And so he became a curse for us. And so, you know, Athanasius is thinking there not just of Christology and then soteriology, but the kind of Savior that we need. We need him to be God, and we need him to be human. So these are, I think, more interinterpreting than Scott allows.
Scott McKnight
It is not an either or. It is first Christology, then soteriology. But when soteriology frames everything, Jesus becomes an agent of the gospel rather than the subject of the gospel. And so I think that the straightforward talking about Jesus is the gospel. My original response to Michael Horton was. Was more disagreeable than the one that showed up in print. Okay. And it's not because I don't like Michael Horton. I do. I mean, I've known him for a long time, and I even read him sometimes. But I really think that we have to begin with Jesus and the person of Jesus. And I don't mean that in an abstract theological way. I mean the guy in sandals in Galilee who shows up in the Gospels and we have to begin there with his message to comprehend what the gospel actually is. So I think Jesus articulated the Gospel in an egocentric framework, is that he was pointing to himself, that he was the center of what he was saying, and that it is an encounter with Jesus that the Gospel is unleashed for the power that it can accomplish.
Host/Interviewer
I could not agree more. The gospel is Jesus. It's not just about Jesus. Jesus is the gospel. He is the good news incarnate.
Scott McKnight
When I read Michael's essay, I. I thought, well, this is very reformed, and this is exactly what I would have expected. But I wanted to say I want more Jesus in this essay. Now, that's. I said this a little bit more stridently, and Jason Maston told me to calm down. But I thought I had a pretty good essay. And I. I did say to myself, it's going to help sell the book if. If I. If I get by with some of these polemics.
Host/Interviewer
Scott's great. Yeah. I appreciate engaging with him. And again, as I say, learn something every time we do. I just think that even though he says it's not a dichotomy, he does kind of present a false dilemma between Jesus the person and Jesus Work. You can't really distinguish even between the person of Jesus and the work of Jesus, because the work Jesus came to do is essential to his hypostatic union. He is God in flesh. Even from the moment of his conception, as Calvin says, he began to win our redemption. His whole life, even beginning as a zygote in the womb of the Virgin Mary, his whole life was redemptive, was salvation, was the gospel. And so you can't really separate what Jesus says about himself, his person, from what Jesus says. He came to do his work Work.
Sola Media Announcer
The church is growing around the world, and so is the need for deep, rooted, faithful theology. That's why we launched Theology Together, a groundbreaking five volume series created in partnership with Zondervan. This series brings together leading Protestant and evangelical scholars from across the globe to explore timeless truths through diverse cultural lenses. The first volume, Prophet, Priest and Christology and Global Perspective, has just been released. Voices from Indonesia, Kenya, Brazil, India, Egypt and beyond join in shared reflection on who Christ is as prophet, priest and king. We believe this kind of work shapes the church for generations. If this resonates with you, would you consider giving to support our work? When you do, we'll send you a copy of this groundbreaking book as a thank you. Just visit solarmedia.orgtheology together to donate and receive your copy. That's solarmedia.orgtheology together.
Know What You Believe with Michael Horton
Date: August 26, 2025
Host: Michael Horton
Key Guests Discussed: John Mark Comer, Scot McKnight
In this episode, Michael Horton examines and responds to the current conversations and debates surrounding the definition and content of the Gospel, especially as taught by figures like John Mark Comer and scholar Scot McKnight. With Comer's growing influence among Gen Z and his emphasis on discipleship, alongside McKnight's push for a narrative, "King Jesus" Gospel, Horton seeks clarity: What, at its core, is the Gospel? The discussion navigates the boundaries between discipleship, ethical teaching, the identity and work of Jesus, and classical Christian doctrines, aiming to equip listeners for thoughtful engagement—both within and beyond the church.
Comer's Teaching: Opens a series by asking, “What is the gospel?” and posits that many Christians have at best incomplete answers. He references Scot McKnight's idea: "The Gospels are the gospel." (04:28)
Horton’s Clarification:
Comer’s View: "Anytime I announce anything about Jesus—his birth, his death, his incarnation, his teachings, his miracles... the great tradition of discipleship... I am preaching the Gospel of Jesus." (09:08)
Horton’s Response:
McKnight’s Thesis: “1 Corinthians 15 is fleshed out in the Gospel sermons of Acts and the Gospels flesh out the gospel sermons in Acts... the gospel is the story about Jesus Christ.” (11:27)
Horton’s Analysis:
Key Quotes:
McKnight’s Distinction:
Horton’s Nuanced Agreement:
On Comer's Influence:
"My students appear not only to be reading him, but to be reading no one else. Once it was Lewis and Chesterton... now it's Comer's world and we're all just living in it." (00:54, Brad East, quoted by Horton)
On Discipleship & Gospel:
"If the gospel is discipleship, then essentially the gospel is law... something we do, not the good news of what Christ has done for us." (08:11, Horton)
On Narrative vs. Doctrinal Gospel:
"The gospel is the story about Jesus Christ. I would pose justification or justice or Jesus..." (11:27, McKnight)
On Person vs. Work:
"You can't really distinguish even between the person of Jesus and the work of Jesus... His whole life... was redemptive, was salvation, was the gospel." (21:20, Horton)
| Timestamp | Segment | |-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------| | 00:54-01:54 | Introduction of John Mark Comer’s influence and critique | | 01:54-03:38 | Comer and Horton on discipleship and gospel basics | | 04:28-06:18 | What is the gospel? Comer and McKnight’s narrative focus | | 08:11-09:28 | Law vs. gospel and the risk of focusing only on following | | 11:27-15:35 | Scot McKnight on the "King Jesus Gospel"; Acts and Gospels | | 17:23-19:24 | Christology before soteriology; McKnight and Horton’s exchange | | 21:20-22:31 | Horton’s conclusion: The indivisibility of person and work |
Michael Horton’s episode offers a thoughtful, occasionally pointed engagement with popular trends in gospel teaching, especially the kingdom- and discipleship-focused models championed by John Mark Comer and Scot McKnight. Horton welcomes their narrative and Christocentric emphases but warns against blurring the distinction between gospel as divine achievement (what Christ has done) and gospel as human imitation or ethical call (what we do). He highlights the theological necessity of holding together Christ’s person and work: the gospel is, inseparably, who Jesus is and what he has objectively accomplished for sinners. Ultimately, the episode is a call for clarity, humility, and depth in understanding and proclaiming the Gospel in an increasingly fragmented age.