Transcript
Ryan Reynolds (0:00)
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop with Mint. You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments. But that's weird. Okay, one judgment anyway. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment.
Voiceover/Announcer (0:22)
Of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra.
Michael Popok (0:28)
See full terms@mintmobile.com got some extraordinary Chief Justice Roberts is in Dialogue with Donald Trump well, it's one sided. Chief Justice Roberts just issued a statement telling Donald Trump to knock it off and stop calling for impeachment of federal judges when he doesn't like or appreciate their rulings against him. Telling him in no uncertain terms in a statement not tied to a case. Just a direct statement from Chief Justice Roberts to Donald Trump and to the public telling him if you don't like a ruling by a federal judge, you, your process is appeal, not impeachment. Appeal, not impeachment. Donald Trump attacked the judge. This is the judge that issued the injunction to stop him from using the Alien Enemies act to continue to deport under a phony war power, a phony exercise of war power, claiming that the enemy combatants need to be expelled immediately from America. And in response to that, he went after the judge after the judge issued his broadcast temporary restraining order that's being litigated as we speak right now in front of this particular judge. I'm Michael Popo. You're on the Midas Touch Network in Legal af. Let's get into this extraordinary, extraordinary moment where the, where the, the, the Chief justice in his role as the chief administrator for all things federal court felt it was incumbent upon him to speak his mind even when there was no case in front of him. I can't think in the last 30 years or 40 years where a chief judge has done that. Look, this chief judge is not covering himself in any glory about he emboldened Donald Trump to become president.
Co-host/Announcer (2:06)
He gave him immunity for most of.
Michael Popok (2:07)
His or all of his criminal, his criminal conduct or behavior. And now he's trying to put the genie back in the bottle. I mean, this is the same Chief justice that refused to preside over one of the impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump after Jan.6 because Donald Trump was no longer president. So he wasn't going to preside over the impeachment proceeding. So he's bent over backwards to Help Donald Trump when he can. So for this person to now come forward and just say what he said is extraordinary. This is what the. Let me read to you first what Donald Trump said. Donald Trump says, because they're all claiming that Judge Boasberg, the chief judge of the. Of the district court in D.C. has no jurisdiction, no power over Donald Trump because he's exercising his commander in chief powers, which he's not. This is what the Trump. Trump called Boasberg crooked, called them an agitator. He said, this judge, like many of the crooked judges I'm forced to appear before, should be impeached. All in capsule. This was on Truth Social on Tuesday morning. We don't want vicious, violent, and demented criminals, many of them deranged murderers in our country. Um, of course, Boseberg did not decline to respond to that, but he continued. This is what the judge said. This is what Trump said. The radical left lunatic of a judge. Here we go again. A troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected president. He didn't win the popular vote by a lot. He didn't win all seven swing states. He didn't win 2752 to 525 counties. He didn't win anything. I won for many reasons in an overwhelming mandate, but fighting illegal immigration may have been the number one reason for this historic victory. I'm just doing what the voters want me to do. And in response, John Roberts, again, this is not normal. Everybody but this. But let me just read you what he wrote. Robert said that, quote, for more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose. I can't express to you enough as a practicing lawyer, how unusual, I guess, is the right word this is to have a Supreme Court justice in open dialogue with the President of the United States telling that guy, the president, back off and don't go after my federal judges that I'm responsible for as the head of Article 3.
