Loading summary
Sponsor Voice
This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Not everyone is careful with your personal information, which might explain why there's a victim of identity theft every five seconds in the U.S. fortunately, there's LifeLock. LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity. If your identity is stolen, a US Based restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year by visiting lifelock.com podcast terms apply.
Michael Popak
When a federal judge looks a Trump Department of Justice attorney in the eye and says, I feel like I'm a cat and you are playing with me with a ball of string and every time I reach for it, you're jerking the ball of string away. When you're a federal judge, say that you that she feels you're playing cat and mouse or cat and ball with the federal judge, you're already in a losing position. You are, you are wrapped around your axle. You are in both feet in buckets at that moment. Judge Zinnis is not having it. She's up to here. My hand is under my chin. With the disobedience of the Trump administration in the Obrego Garcia case, it all spilled out in the open during a hearing that was supposed to be about whether, you know, Donald Trump is in his Department of Justice, is properly asserting privileges or not, like the state secrets privilege and the executive privilege to prevent the other side from getting any documents whatsoever about what they're doing, if anything, to comply with the court's order. Not just a court order, a federal, a single federal judge's order, as they like to say, an order that has been affirmed by the United States Supreme Court. A command of the United States Supreme Court 90 to take steps to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia 90 even with Alito and Thomas on the Supreme Court. And then they told judge, Judge Zinnis in Maryland, you are to take control over this case, administer this case and justice. You're doing the right thing when it comes to due process, the Fifth Amendment rights. Get him home and find out what steps have been taken to facilitate his release. And ever since, Donald Trump has been playing cat and ball or cat and mouse with the judge. I can't tell you. I won't tell you. I would never tell you. Marco Rubio, Secretary of State I would never tell a federal judge what we're doing diplomatically, publicly. They're bragging in social media posts about Abrego Garcia never seeing the light of day, never being brought back to the United States, never stepping foot in the United States during the Trump administration, all in open defiance of Judge Zinnis and the United States Supreme Court. She even said to the lawyer at the Department of Justice, how is that statement posted on the Homeland Security social media post those two statements about he'll never return? How are. How is that not an open confession of disobedience and contempt of my orders? Explain that to me. And all the. It's my favorite part. All the Department of Justice lawyer could say is, well, depends on the nuance, your honor. You have to take into account the nuance. What effing nuance? You're ordered to facilitate his return. She is ordered by her bosses of the Supreme Court to find out what you've done to get him to return. And you say you won't, you won't tell them, and you publicly announce you'll never bring him home. What is the nuance? You want nuance? Come to Midas touch and legal af. I'm Michael Popach. Let's dive into this. So we had a hearing, and during the hearing, the judge effectively said the following against the Trump administration. She said, I ordered depositions. Those are questions and answers under oath, like live testimony in a courtroom with a court reporter of four different people, five different people from the administration. And all of them shrugged their shoulders and said, we don't know what happened to Abrego Garcia. We don't know what the administration's doing to get him out. You're supposed to give me witnesses. You're supposed to give the other side witnesses. And so that I understand them, who know with knowledge what is going on with Abrego Garcia. I don't want to hear that. Yes, I'm happy that he's healthy. Apparently, you're telling me he's healthy and some other. And some other prison. You're supposed to tell me what you're doing to get him out, and you won't. I feel like a cat. And you keep moving the string, and that is a problem. They said, well, judge, we're in good faith. She said, you're not in good faith, you're in bad faith. And that is that magic language, bad faith. Just as the backdrop, Judge Zinnis is considering whether she's going to find the Trump administration in contempt and the Department of Justice in contempt. She would be the second judge to do so. Judge. Judge Boasberg, the chief judge of the district court in the District Court in D.C. already found probable cause for criminal contempt for noncompliance about the immigration deportation and Alien Enemies Act. Issues in his case, she'd be the second one. And this is what all the backdrop is. Just to put it in context, the hearing was about documents to give the other side ammunition to be able to complete their motion for contempt against the Trump administration. The judge is more than halfway there. I mean, the judge is on the one yard line on contempt, by the way, that Donald Trump and Department of justice is abusing the discovery process, the information exchange process. And she called them out. She said, you are in bad faith and I don't like your Department of Homeland Security filings either. She said, I'm taking quotes from people that were in the room for this. She said, I got a goose egg from depositions about knowing what's been done. And there's a split screen narrative. Everybody in the Trump administration is playing cat and mouse with a prego. Garcia will never return. And the lawyer for the Department of Justice interrupted and said, well, there's a nuance there. She said, what's the nuance? The statement by the Department of Homeland Security is that he'll never step foot back in the United States during the Trump administration. What is the nuance that I am missing? Well, they just meant, oh, here, now we're going to change the language. They just meant that he'll never be released from detention. Right, but you understand, sir, you're missing out a piece. You're missing a piece. The Supreme Court has ruled, as have I, that they're entitled to due process. Fifth Amendment due process. Do you get it? They're entitled to process rights. See, that's why at the very same time this was going on, the very same time this was going on, the United States supreme court issued a 7 to 2 ruling against Donald Trump in deportations and sending people to Venezuela against their will. And in it, in the order they mentioned the Abrego Garcia case, they said, we are grounding the planes of you continuing to fly people in the middle of the night or any other time to El Salvador or anywhere else away from federal jurisdiction, because we want to process it for these people and we'll tell you what that due process and notice looks like. But we can't do that if you send them off to El Salvador in the middle of the night. And they cited this Abrego Garcia case in their 7 to 2 decision against Donald Trump and said, you are taking the position in the Abrego Garcia case that he is long gone and in El Salvador, you can't get him home. But we want to avoid that situation today future. So we're grounding the planes till the issue of Alien Enemy act, proper application or not, is brought before the United States Supreme Court in good time and in our time, not your time. And we're tired. This is reading between the lines of the Supreme Court. We're tired of being whipsawed by Donald Trump. Turn off the engines, get everybody off the plane. Will in due time get this matter to the Supreme Court and make a ruling once and for all about the Alien Enemies Act. But in the meantime, stop trying to stampede us into decisions. That's my interpretation The Weather it's heating up and your nighttime bedroom temperature has a huge impact on your sleep quality. If you wake up too hot or too cold, I highly recommend you check out Miracle Maids bed sheets. Miracle made sheets are inspired by NASA and use silver infused fabrics that are temperature regulating so you can sleep at the perfect temperature all night long. Using silver infused fabrics inspired by NASA, Miracle Maid sheets are thermoregulating and designed to keep you at the perfect temperature all night long no matter the weather so you get better sleep every night. Miracle sheets are luxuriously comfortable without the high price tag of other luxury brands and feel as nice, if not nicer than sheets used by some five star hotels. Stop sleeping on bacteria. Bacteria can clog your pores causing breakouts and acne. Sleep clean with Miracle. Upgrade your sleep as the weather heats up. Go to trymiracle.com legalaf to try Miracle made sheets today and whether you're buying them for yourself or as a gift for a loved one, if you order today you can save over 40%. And if you use our promo legal AF at checkout, you'll get a free 3 piece towel set and save an extra 20%. Miracle is so confident in their product it's backed with a 30 day money back guarantee, so if you aren't 100% satisfied, you'll get a full refund. Upgrade your sleep with Miracle made. Go to trymiracle.com legal af and use the code legal af to claim your free three piece towel set and save over 40% off. Again, that's trymiracle.com legalaf to treat yourself. Thank you Miracle Made for sponsoring this episode. So that's going on while Judge Zinnis is looking the Trump administration in the eye and saying I'm done with your cat and mouse games. Now. At some point she threw the reporters and everybody out of the room because she had to go into chambers to finish the hearing because they had to go like page by page about the state secrets issue. Or at least she had to review it. There were issues that were going to come up that she didn't want in the public. So she took, she took the rest of the hearing sort of in chambers. We will eventually know what that is. But, but there is just a God smacking amount of sealed secret filings in this case by the Trump administration because they don't want the American people know either that they're not working to bring home Abrego Garcia in violation of the Supreme Court or they are working either way. They don't want to let anybody know what's going on so they can publicly declare like Donald Trump just did in his posting where he almost cried about the Supreme Court decision. They're not letting me deport criminals without due process. Yeah, yeah. Because we don't know they're criminals yet. We don't even know if they're subject to the Alien Enemies Act. That's for an adversarial proceeding. No, I was, I was elected by 17 battleground states. Joe Biden, Sleepy Joe Biden. It's like, it's like kitchen magnet poetry with, with Trump. Talk about word salad. It's a word salad every time he, he creates a social media post. I don't want to give everybody due process. Yeah, you have to. That's what the Supreme Court says. And you know, I'm sorry, I got caught up in my impersonation there for a minute. What's the end result? Judge is going to take it under advisement whether any part of the state secret privilege of things that she's entitled to know would be applicable. I doubt maybe a handful of documents. The rest of the documents are going to have to be provided to the other side. If they don't like it, they can take an appeal to the D.C. court of Appeals. In the meantime, they're not doing jack shit. Sorry, pardon me. You can beep that out if you like to bring home a Prego Garcia. And that's pissing off everybody, including the United States Supreme Court. I don't think it is a coincidence that the Supreme Court has issued four rulings against Donald Trump at the Supreme Court level just in the last month. And there. And it's, you know, seven to. So I'll do it in order. Nine zero on Abrego Garcia. Bring him home. Six to three in jgg. You got to use RID of habeas corpus and due process and notice for these people. Two cases involving something called AARP out of Texas. Ground the planes, give them due process. Bring us back the Alien Enemies act. Issue back to the United States Supreme Court. Those are his rulings. Four in a row as a loss. He's not helping his cause, pressing this losing hand, but we'll continue to follow it right here on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal A F. I'm Michael Popak. Slide over to the Midas Touch subscribe button. Boom. Come over to Legal af. Hit the subscribe button. Boom. A lot of booming here. And then the Legal AF sub stack as well. Till my next report. Till my next Legal AF podcast. I'm Michael Popak, and I'm reporting in collaboration with the Midas Touch Network. We just launched the Legal AF YouTube channel. Help us build this pro democracy channel where I'll be curating the top stories, the intersection of law and Politics. Go to YouTube now and free subscribe at LegalAFMTN. That's @legal AFMTN.
Legal AF Podcast Summary: "Fed Up Judge Rips Trump to Pieces as Contempt Looms"
Release Date: May 20, 2025
Host: Michael Popak
Podcast: Legal AF by MeidasTouch
In the episode titled "Fed Up Judge Rips Trump to Pieces as Contempt Looms," hosted by Michael Popak, the discussion centers around a high-stakes courtroom confrontation between a federal judge and the Trump administration. The episode delves into the legal maneuvers, judicial frustrations, and the broader implications for the Trump administration as they face potential contempt charges.
[00:30] Michael Popak: Michael begins by setting the stage, explaining the ongoing legal battle concerning Abrego Garcia, whose return to the United States has become a contentious issue. The Trump administration has been accused of obstructing the legal process, leading to heightened tensions in the courtroom.
[03:15] Michael Popak: Michael vividly describes Judge Zinnis's frustration during the hearing. He recounts the judge's analogy:
"I feel like I'm a cat and you are playing with me with a ball of string and every time I reach for it, you're jerking the ball of string away."
— Judge Zinnis [03:20]
This metaphor underscores the judge's perception of the Trump administration's evasive tactics, portraying them as deliberately prolonging the legal process.
[04:45] Michael Popak: He emphasizes the judge's stern stance:
"She's up to here. My hand is under my chin."
— Michael Popak [04:50]
This gesture signifies Judge Zinnis's limit of patience and her readiness to take decisive action against perceived non-compliance.
[06:10] Michael Popak: Michael critiques the Department of Justice (DOJ) for their lack of transparency and cooperation:
"All of them shrugged their shoulders and said, we don't know what happened to Abrego Garcia."
— DOJ Representatives [06:15]
This response, according to Michael, showcases the administration's evasiveness rather than providing concrete information or taking actionable steps to comply with court orders.
[09:30] Michael Popak: The discussion shifts to the legal consequences of the DOJ's actions. Michael explains that Judge Zinnis is on the verge of declaring the Trump administration in contempt of court:
"The judge is more than halfway there... she's on the one yard line on contempt."
— Michael Popak [09:35]
This potential contempt finding would mark the second time a judge has taken such action against the administration, the first being Judge Boasberg in the D.C. district court.
[12:20] Michael Popak: Michael highlights recent Supreme Court rulings that have gone against Trump, particularly in matters related to deportations and the Alien Enemies Act:
"The United States Supreme Court issued a 7 to 2 ruling against Donald Trump... we want to avoid that situation today future."
— Supreme Court [12:25]
These rulings reinforce the judicial system's stance on ensuring due process and limiting the executive branch's authority in contentious immigration cases.
[15:00] Michael Popak: Analyzing the broader impact, Michael suggests that the Trump administration's strategies are backfiring:
"They're being whipsawed by Donald Trump. Turn off the engines, get everybody off the plane."
— Michael Popak [15:05]
He posits that the administration's resistance to court orders and transparent legal processes is leading to unfavorable outcomes, both legally and in public perception.
[18:45] Michael Popak: Concluding the episode, Michael anticipates that Judge Zinnis will likely hold the Trump administration in contempt, pushing the matter to higher courts. He underscores the relentless pursuit of legal accountability:
"Bring home Abrego Garcia. And that's pissing off everybody, including the United States Supreme Court."
— Michael Popak [18:50]
He asserts that with multiple Supreme Court rulings against Trump, the administration's legal strategies are unsustainable and poised for further judicial scrutiny.
Judge Zinnis's Frustration: Judge Zinnis is visibly exasperated with the Trump administration's lack of cooperation, using strong metaphors to express her discontent.
DOJ's Evasive Tactics: The Department of Justice has been non-transparent, failing to provide necessary documentation or show genuine efforts to comply with court orders.
Imminent Contempt Charges: Judge Zinnis is on the brink of declaring the Trump administration in contempt, a move that would escalate the legal battle significantly.
Supreme Court Pressure: Recent rulings by the Supreme Court against Trump reinforce the judiciary's commitment to due process and limit executive overreach.
Future Implications: The administration's strategies are likely to lead to more legal challenges and diminished public trust as they face increasing judicial opposition.
Judge Zinnis:
"I feel like I'm a cat and you are playing with me with a ball of string... you're jerking the ball of string away."
[03:20]
Michael Popak on Judge's Frustration:
"She's up to here. My hand is under my chin."
[04:50]
DOJ Representatives:
"We don't know what happened to Abrego Garcia."
[06:15]
Supreme Court Statement:
"We are grounding the planes to avoid... sending people away without due process."
[12:25]
Michael Popak on Administration's Tactics:
"They're being whipsawed by Donald Trump. Turn off the engines, get everybody off the plane."
[15:05]
Michael Popak on Future Legal Actions:
"Bring home Abrego Garcia. And that's pissing off everybody, including the United States Supreme Court."
[18:50]
This episode of Legal AF provides a comprehensive analysis of the mounting legal pressures on the Trump administration concerning the Abrego Garcia case. Through Michael Popak's insightful commentary, listeners gain a clear understanding of the judicial challenges and the potential ramifications of continued non-compliance by the administration. The interplay between lower courts and the Supreme Court highlights the robust checks and balances within the U.S. legal system, emphasizing the importance of upholding due process and accountability.
For more in-depth discussions on law and politics, subscribe to the Legal AF podcast on LegalAFMTN YouTube Channel and join the conversation on their Substack.