Loading summary
Ryan Reynolds
I can say to my new Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra hey, find a keto friendly restaurant nearby and text it to Beth and Steve. And it does without me lifting a finger so I can get in more squats anywhere I can.
Cashier
1, 2, 3 will that be cash or credit?
Michael Popak
Credit.
Cashier
4 Galaxy S25 Ultra the AI companion that does the heavy lifting so you can do. You get yours@samsung.com compatible with select apps. Requires Google Gemini account. Results may vary based on input. Check responses for accuracy. Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same Premium Wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do@mintmobile.com.
Ryan Reynolds
Switch upfront payment of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month Required intro rate first 3 months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com you know what's smart? Enjoying a fresh gourmet meal at home that you didn't have to cook meat. Factor your loophole in the laws of mealtime. Chef crafted meals delivered with a tap, ready in just two minutes. You know what's even smarter? Treating yourself without cheating your goals. Factor is dietitian approved, chef prepared, and you plated. Pretty smart, huh? Refresh your routine and eat smart with factor. Learn more@formeal.com A Jan6 insurrectionist lawyer and.
Michael Popak
Personal lapdog for Elon Musk has been chosen to be the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. Ed Martin, he's been the Acting Interim U.S. attorney for the for D.C. apparently, if you participate in an insurrection, if you defend insurrectionists, if you have challenged ethics, which I'll describe in this hot take, you're perfect to be the U.S. attorney under Donald Trump for the District of Columbia. Let's talk about Ed Martin here on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal AF. Ed Martin represented a number of Jan6 insurrectionists. He participated and gave a speech at the Ellipse on January 6th. In fact, back to the challenged ethics aspect of his legal career. As the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, he actually signed his name to a motion to dismiss charges against one of his clients when he was in private practice, right? Jose Padilla or Joe Padilla, who was indicted for attacking two law enforcement one with a flagpole that he hit the cop in the head in his helmet. And when there was time to dismiss it, Ed Martin, U.S. attorney Acting, signed the motion to dismiss a case against his former. His client. No, not former. His client, Joe Padilla. I'm just trying to show you that the Trump administration and the people that he picks for these jobs are completely ethically conflicted. They're so upside down ethically and in a corrupt way that they can't even see that, see clear. I mean, like, when you flip sides from defense lawyer to prosecutor, you're not supposed to be trying to benefit your former client. That is a direct violation of our ethics rules as lawyers. The Department of Justice's Ethics committee would have investigated this, but who's going to investigate them? Donald Trump has removed all of the watchdogs, all of the ethicists, the government. The government Office of Ethics is gone. Inspectors general are gone.
Prolon Representative
Yeah.
Michael Popak
Who's going to do the investigating of Ed Martin? So Ed Martin lap dog Elon Musk, soon as he got in his acting interim, he decided he was going to try to reach out and protect the DOGE employees. And he sent a series of social media posts directed to Elon Musk, telling him, don't worry, don't worry. If anybody does anything illegal or even, even unethical, we'll chase them to the ends of the earth. See the retribution. See the weaponization of the Department of Justice by Donald Trump while he gaslights us continuously and says he's not weaponizing the. Pam Bondi, his head of the Department of Justice, gets up in front of a podium when she can barely put a sentence together. I mean, seriously, I'd love to see the other side of her teleprompter to see what. I mean, she needs flashcards at this point, but she gets up there and says, it's a new Department of Justice.
Prolon Representative
It's.
Michael Popak
We're not weaponizing. We're gonna be weaponizing the weaponizing. I'm like, what are you even talking about? Just look down the hallway at Ed Martin. He. He's basically told the world, he has told the world in his postings to Elon Musk that he will, in a retro, in a, in a retribution fashion, go after people that investigate the Department of Government Efficiency, whatever that's supposed to be. I got news for Ed Martin. Maybe they didn't teach you this in St. Louis Law School or in Missouri when you headed the Republican Party, but we have a First Amendment and freedom of the press. And if we want to take a look at all the people that are on the roster of this government, we're supposed to be a government in the sunshine. We're supposed to be a government in transparency. That's why we have Freedom of Information act requests and lawsuits related to it. When Donald Trump's not busy fighting off three or four thousand lawsuits over the next four years, and I think I may be underestimating that number. You can just add to that, right next to it, a parallel set of numbers related to Freedom of Information act requests, public records requests, because we're going to have to go after these bastards. Yeah. So let's talk about Ed Martin for a minute here. He posts during the January 6th insurrection. Again, I have to question your judgment, Mr. Martin, and your ability to have this job. And I think you're going to have to answer for this when you're actually up in a confirmation process with the Senate. You actually said at the time, in real time, while you were social media posting rowdy crowd, quote, not out of hand, fake news. How do you explain 2,000 people being investigated, prosecuted and indicted and arrested? How do you explain that this rowdy crowd was not out of hand, but over 250 people were injured, including mostly law enforcement? Five people died as a result of January 6, including a couple of insurrectionists. One died by a heart attack. The other one was shot and killed. Ashley Babbitt as she tried to break her way through the Speaker's hallway to get inside where elected officials were trying to leave. Does anybody doubt Having watched the Jan6 insurrectionists, a few of them represented by Ed Martin, now being rewarded with this U.S. attorney position? Does anybody doubt that how they battled in a medieval style on the steps of the Capitol on the western terrace, hand to hand combat with outmatched police. Does anybody doubt that if they had broken through the line, really, and gotten in while elected officials and their staff were still in the chamber, that we wouldn't have, they wouldn't have blood on their hands, that they wouldn't have killed them. They were trying to kill cops. Law enforcement didn't stop them. The social contract didn't stop them.
Prolon Representative
Long work weeks and busy weekends, month after month, they can leave you feeling and looking depleted. Prolon's program takes the guest workout and equips you with a science backed plan, making it a key tool for your health journey. Prolon's Fasting Mimicking diet is a revolutionary plant based nutrition program that nourishes the body while making cells believe they're fasting. Researched and developed for decades at USC's Longevity Institute and backed by leading US medical centers, Prolon helps support healthy blood sugar, enhanced skin appearance, fat loss and improved energy and focus. Post fast it all starts with their five day program. Snacks, soups and beverages designed to keep your body in a fasting state. No guesswork or planning required. Three consecutive cycles of Prolon have been shown to reduce your biological age score by an average of 2 1/2 years and your waist circumference by 1 1/2 inches. Look when I'm craving a real reset. Prolon is the only nutrition program that works for me. It's convenient, backed by Nobel winning science and it works. To help you kickstart a health plan that truly works, Prolon is offering Legal AF by Midas Touch listeners 15% off site wide plus a $40 bonus gift. When you subscribe to their 5 day nutrition program, just visit prolonlife.com legalaf that's P R O L O N l I f e.com legalif to claim your 15% discount and your bonus gift.
Michael Popak
Prolonlife.com legalaf and instead, what is the lesson that you've now been taught, ladies and gentlemen, children, out there by our president, the moral leader of the free world, that you can attack the Capitol and you'll be rewarded with pardons, jobs in my administration and top jobs. The Department of Justice. Sign me up, I guess if all you care about is greed and career advancement. The next insurrection led by Donald Trump's group and we'll have another one because he's going to lose badly at the midterm elections at this rate. No doubt, no doubt in my mind. Of course we can't just talk about it here. That's where it starts. Got to go to the voting booths eventually. But if we take, if we take out the House and the Senate and there's another attack on the Capitol as a result, then what's, what's the lesson to be learned?
Prolon Representative
Don't worry. Don't worry.
Michael Popak
We'll be able to, we'll be able to get top jobs in the next administration. The J.D. vance administration. No, it can't be that. Even Donald Trump doesn't think J.D. vance is ready to be the President of the United States. So somebody and we'll get top Department of Justice jobs. Look at all the people in Donald Trump's administration in the Department of Justice. All people that were his criminal defense lawyers or impeachment defense lawyers. Pam Bondi, she had a terrible job. He got impeached. Impeachment defense lawyer Todd Blanche. I'll do a hot take on him next. Emil Beauvais, his Top two criminal lawyers. They have the top two, the two and three jobs in the Department of Justice. Pam Bondi, impeachment lawyer. Top one job in the Department of Justice. Yeah, you've got. You've got John Sauer, who is his top criminal appellate lawyer, who's gonna be the Solicitor General of the United States, the 10th justice, if you will. This guy gonna be the U.S. attorney. I want. You know, it's funny. I had a conversation. Not funny, sad. I had a texting conversation with a close friend of mine. He's in his 70s and, and a Republican. I mean, he's an independent, but, you know, he was.
Prolon Representative
He was a.
Michael Popak
He was going to vote for Trump, and he did vote for Trump. And I said to him at the time, why, why and how? He said, I just think he'll be more moderate and he'll be, you know, he, he won't overreach and he'll bring civility back to the White House. I said, and you think that was missing during the Biden era? And he said, yeah. And now I get a text from him yesterday and in which he says, I am not happy with the current state of affairs. This is not what I voted for. I wanted moderation. Well, that. You weren't paying attention during the campaign, because he's doing exactly. And the people around him and his henchmen around him, like Stephen Miller, are doing exactly what he said he was going to do. This government is. This government is currently run by one person, Donald Trump, with Stephen Miller next to him as his. As his, his hunting dog in the White House as White House counselor, and Elon Musk. That's it. The rest of these people, they might have the title of Secretary of State, secretary of the Treasury, Department of Justice, Attorney General. They're not even. Ed Martin said the quiet part out loud. He said, the prosecutors for the Department of Justice are the President's lawyers. The prosecutors for the Department of Justice are the President's lawyers. Where is he getting that from? It's the unitary president theory, the unitary executive branch theory that all power, all power of the executive branch resides only at the top, in the person elected president. And everybody else in that. In that branch, all. Everybody in that branch reports to the President. And so they don't see independence of the Department of Justice as being a good thing. They see it as a weakening of the presidential power. And that's where Ed Martin comes in. Philosophically, he believes in the unitary president and that the prosecutors, like him are lawyers for the president. Now, after Nixon, we thought It'd probably be a good idea to have an independent judiciary. After Hoover ran the FBI as his personal fiefdom. Right. And power base, we thought maybe it's a good idea to have these things be independent. Independent director of the FBI, an independent head of the Department of Justice. And sometimes we found it frustrating. Who wasn't frustrated by Merrick Garland and how he ran the Department of Justice, but you couldn't say he was unethical. You might say he was slow on the draw. You might say he assumed. He made assumptions about the good nature of people that he shouldn't have. He was late in appointing the special counsel. He didn't push them to go fast enough. Right. But you can't call Merrick Garland corrupt. Yeah. You might. Incompetent. Yeah. Not at the velocity at which the moment in history required. Sure. Corrupt, no. Independent, yes. Too. Some of us would say too independent. You appointed Robert her to be the special prosecutor to go after Joe Biden for documents that he took with him 10 years ago because he's a Republican. You want to be fair and balanced. The Republicans would never do that. So too independent. But, you know, say what you want about Christopher Wray when he was the head of the FBI, but a lack of independence was not the problem. So we're going to continue to follow the Ed Martins of the world and what happens to them during the Senate confirmation process right here on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal af. I got a new show. It's a podcast. I call it popoc Live. I couldn't come up with anything better because it's me live and I take questions, I give answers, and I sit at the intersection of law and politics just like this. On Wednesdays and Saturdays, we have Legal AF, the OG podcast. And that's 8, 8pm Eastern Time on YouTube. Anywhere you can pick up audio podcast platforms. POPOC Live Tuesday nights at 8pm right here on the Midas Touch Network. And then we got this brand new channel, Legal AF, the YouTube channel Legal AFMTN for Midas Touch Network. Help me build that channel to 1 million before our year is over. We're gonna be at half a million in about another two or three weeks with your help. And that's, you know, we just got started September 17th, so if you missed out on the build, the original build of Midas Touch, come over and help us with Legal af. We need your help. So until my next reporting, I'm Michael Popak in collaboration with the Midas Touch Network, we just launched the Legal AF YouTube channel. Help us build this pro democracy channel where I'll be curating the top stories, the intersection of law and politics. Go to YouTube and free subscribe at Legal afmtn. That's at Legal afmtn.
Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Episode Summary: "Felon Trump’s Poison Pill in DOJ Gets Instantly Exposed"
Release Date: February 21, 2025
Hosts: Ben Meiselas, Michael Popok, Karen Friedman Agnifilo
Executive Producer: Meidas Media Network
In the episode titled "Felon Trump’s Poison Pill in DOJ Gets Instantly Exposed," hosted by Michael Popok of the MeidasTouch Network, the discussion centers around the controversial appointment of Ed Martin as the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. The episode delves into the ethical implications of Martin's past associations and actions, highlighting concerns about the Department of Justice's (DOJ) integrity under the Trump administration.
[01:33] Michael Popok:
Michael Popok begins by scrutinizing the selection of Ed Martin, labeling him as "a personal lapdog for Elon Musk" and emphasizing his suitability for the U.S. Attorney position due to his involvement with a number of January 6 insurrectionists. Popok critiques Martin's participation in the insurrection and his defense of individuals involved in the events at the Capitol.
Notable Quote:
"Ed Martin represented a number of Jan6 insurrectionists... You're perfect to be the U.S. attorney under Donald Trump for the District of Columbia."
— Michael Popok [01:33]
Popok raises serious ethical questions regarding Martin's actions both prior to and during his tenure as the interim U.S. Attorney. He cites an incident where Martin, while in private practice, signed a motion to dismiss charges against his client, Joe Padilla, who was indicted for attacking law enforcement with a flagpole. Popok underscores that such actions constitute a direct violation of legal ethics, particularly the prohibition against benefiting former clients.
Notable Quote:
"When you flip sides from defense lawyer to prosecutor, you're not supposed to be trying to benefit your former client. That is a direct violation of our ethics rules as lawyers."
— Michael Popok [02:20]
The discussion progresses to the broader issue of ethical oversight within the DOJ. Popok asserts that the Trump administration has systematically dismantled watchdog institutions like the Government Office of Ethics and Inspectors General, leaving no mechanism to hold officials like Ed Martin accountable.
Notable Quote:
"Donald Trump has removed all of the watchdogs, all of the ethicists, the government. The Government Office of Ethics is gone. Inspectors general are gone."
— Michael Popok [03:10]
Popok accuses the DOJ of being weaponized to serve Trump's interests, highlighting Martin's actions as evidence. He references Martin's social media posts directed at Elon Musk, where Martin pledges to pursue any illegal or unethical actions against the Department relentlessly.
Notable Quote:
"Ed Martin... has told the world... he will, in a retribution fashion, go after people that investigate the Department of Government Efficiency."
— Michael Popok [04:10]
Popok also criticizes DOJ officials like Pam Bondi for downplaying these issues, suggesting incompetence and a lack of coherent communication from the department's leadership.
A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to discussing the importance of DOJ independence from presidential influence. Popok contrasts the current administration's approach with historical attempts to ensure an independent judiciary post-Nixon and Hoover eras. He argues that the unitary executive theory, which centralizes power within the presidency, undermines the DOJ's role as an impartial enforcer of the law.
Notable Quote:
"The prosecutors for the Department of Justice are the President's lawyers... they don't see independence of the Department of Justice as being a good thing."
— Michael Popok [10:30]
Popok shares a personal anecdote about a friend who voted for Trump with the expectation of increased moderation and civility, only to feel disillusioned by the administration's actions. He warns that the current trajectory could lead to further insurrections and erosion of democratic norms if unchecked.
Notable Quote:
"This government is currently run by one person, Donald Trump, with Stephen Miller next to him as his hunting dog in the White House."
— Michael Popok [10:50]
In wrapping up the episode, Popok emphasizes the necessity of maintaining DOJ independence to preserve the rule of law and democratic integrity. He encourages listeners to engage in the political process, particularly through voting, to counteract the current administration's influence on legal institutions.
Notable Quote:
"If we want to take a look at all the people that are on the roster of this government, we're supposed to be a government in the sunshine. We're supposed to be a government in transparency."
— Michael Popok [06:15]
The episode serves as a critical examination of the Trump administration's impact on the Department of Justice, highlighting concerns over ethical breaches, the erosion of institutional checks and balances, and the potential long-term consequences for American democracy. Michael Popok's analysis underscores the importance of vigilance and active participation in safeguarding the integrity of legal and political institutions.
Note: This summary excludes advertisements, intros, outros, and non-content sections to focus solely on the substantive discussions and insights presented in the episode.