Loading summary
A
Trip planner by Expedia. You were made to outdo your holiday, your hammocking and your pooling. We were made to help organize the competition. Expedia made to travel back to school.
B
Is better with family freedom from T Mobile we'll pay off four phones up to $3200 and give you four free phones all on America's largest 5G network. Visit your local T Mobile location or learn more@t mobile.com familyfreed up to $800 per line via virtual prepaid card typically takes 15 days. Free phones via 24 monthly bill credits with finance agreement eg Apple iPhone 16128 gigabyte $829.99 eligible trade in iPhone 11 Pro for well qualified credits end and balance due if you pay off earlier.
A
Cancel contact T Mobile in breaking news, yet another federal judge. Make that three who are telling Donald Trump and his Department of Justice release the damn files in the Epstein matter. Berman, Richard Berman, judge in New York on the heels of Judge Engelmeier, on the heels of Judge Rothenberg, has said that the Trump administration has failed to meet its burden to show that the quote unquote grand jury transcripts, which are pretty scant and slim pickings to begin with, should be released in the interest of public interest. Or to paraphrase Judge Berman, you're sitting on the treasure trove of information. You're sitting on the 10,000 pages of documents. You're in the best position to release it to the public. Stop barking up the tree of federal judges. Very similar to what Judge Engelmeier ruled last week and his rulings about the Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts. Judge Berman is all about the Epstein prosecution because he was the presiding judge. You're on Legal AF and on the Midas Touch Network. Let's get to the breaking news part, the part that I love when I get to read from orders where Donald Trump has lost. How do we get here? We got here because Donald Trump promised the American people during the campaign and certainly after his presidency started that he would release the Epstein files in their entirety. That's what he said. That's what Pam Bondi said. That's what. That's what Cash Patel, the FBI director, said in writing, including in February. They would release it all. No stone would go unturned. No document would be except to protect the victims, would be would be held back. And what have they done holding back documents, all of them not releasing anything and hoping the American people would notice when they issued a two page memo closeout memo which did everything except close this out to say, there's nothing to see here, there's no Epstein client list, and he died in jail by hanging. He committed suicide. Are we okay now? No, we're not okay now. And the more that Donald Trump and his administration have tried to find, fix the problem and cover up the crimes, the more the relationship between Donald Trump and his two best friends, Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and their child sex trafficking, their raping of girls came to the forefront. And why is Donald Trump protecting his former best friends? Why isn't he just releasing everything? And then they ran and did the. Let's hope Congress can bail us out. Maybe the Oversight Committee will order us to turn over the documents. Maybe that'll, maybe that'll get the public on our side. And that hasn't worked. Although the Oversight Committee is now in the last 24 hours. Said We've got some docs. We got them from the Department of Justice. We're going to be releasing them. We're not going to tell you what they are. They're not, they're going to be edited, they're not going to be complete, but we got some. Okay, then, then, then the Trump Tech technique, besides trying to convince everybody it's a hoax, to which 1,000 sex crimes victims have declared in unison, we are not a hoax. When that didn't work and JD Vance going on Sunday morning talk shows blaming Biden, didn't work, they then turned to why don't we interview Ghislaine Maxwell and give her immunity? But they f'd that up too. Because it's bad enough you gave her immunity. She's a convicted child sex trafficker convicted of sexual abuse of women and girls. She's serving a 20 year prison sentence and you're doing business with her as an administration, how low have you sunk that you need a convicted child sex trafficker to vouch for your credibility? Donald Trump? Pretty low. And they even screwed that up because then all the deal parts came out. She gets to go and live in a low security prison camp, you know, you know, basically a Beverly Hills prison kiss. She gets to do that. She's got immunity. And then they thought, well, we better have a meeting, a secret meeting at the White House. So everybody knew about the secret meeting in the White House. We reported on it and there they discussed what should Todd Blanche do with the interview he took? Should he release it, should he edit it, should he have a press conference? Should he go on Joe Rogan? I'm not making this up. That's all true. And so we're still tick, tick, tick, tick, tick. Still no Ghislaine Maxwell interview been released. So now we've got the original three judges that Donald Trump went to, Rothenberg in Florida, Engelmeier in New York, and now Berman in New York, asking them to release under a rule that doesn't really allow the release of grand jury transcripts for very good reason. We're trying to protect the innocent. We're trying to protect witnesses, we're trying to protect people, we're trying to protect grand jurors, trying to protect or make sure that people who would be indicted aren't going to escape. It's very good reasons under Rule 6e of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. And here's what Berman had to say. My favorite part, you know, when I read from these things. But again, he's, he, whatever he's saying is very similar to what Engelmeier said last week in his. But let me just read to you from the pages that I thought were very, very interesting. Having found that they have not made out their burden, that they concede that they can't meet any of the narrow exceptions in Rule 6e, they're left with this special circumstances judge. And the judge says, you're not making out your special circumstances at all either. Here's what he Sundays on page six. The significant and compelling reason to reject the government's position in this litigation is that the government has already undertaken a comprehensive investigation into the Epstein case and not surprisingly, has assembled a quote, unquote trove of Epstein documents. That's Pam Bondi's words, interviews and exhibits. As the end, the government committed that it would share its Epstein investigation materials with the public. Here comes the release the damn files part of the order. The department remains committed to transparency and intends to release the remaining Epstein files. February 27, 2025 press release. The government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf. Here's the judge again. Page seven, the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials. I mean, I wasn't a math major, but a thousand two hundred thousand pages over here with the Trump administration versus seven thousand seven, zero pages in the grand jury transcripts. You know, when my mom passed away recently, unexpectedly, it really hit me. None of us are guaranteed tomorrow. And in that moment, I started thinking hard about what would happen to my family if something happened to me. Would they be financially okay? Could they keep up with the mortgage, college plans, everything? That's why I looked into life insurance through Ethos because it's fast, easy and it helps protect your family's financial future. I didn't want to deal with a complicated process or get stuck doing a medical exam. And with Ethos you don't have to. You just answer a few health questions online and you can get a quote in as little as 10 minutes. Ethos offers up to 3 million in coverage and some policies start as low as $2 a day billed month. You can even get same day coverage without ever leaving your house. As of March 2025, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. Over 3 million families have trusted them. Protect your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free', @ethos.com LegalAF that's E T H O S.com LegalAF this is again refuting Donald Trump's attempt to try to recast the Epstein files as being the grand jury transcripts. The government's Epstein files, Judge, the judge continues, are not sui generis. They are investigatory and not subject to federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6e. The government is the logical party. The judge continues to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files. And then he drops a footnote just from yesterday, right? This is how or from two days ago. The House Committee on this is footnote six. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Chairman James Comer, Republican Kentucky I love he puts that Republican Kentucky in there. Has recently stated that the U.S. department of justice informed the committee it will begin providing Epstein related records this week. That's where you should look. Release the damn files. The Grand Jury let's see. In February 2025, the government, as noted, was prepared to release the Epstein files. Then, on July 6, 2025, the government announced it would not make the files public. Quote it is the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted. That's from now. July 6, 2025 the DOJ and FBI memo There is another compelling reason the judge says not to unseal the Epstein grand jury materials as this, namely, possible threats to victim safety and and privacy. The court received a very compelling letter on August 5 from the three leading victims rights attorneys who have stated, quote, any disclosure of grand jury material, especially material that could expose or help identify victims, in any way directly affects their fairness, privacy, conferral and protection guarantees. These attorneys represent numerous survivors of Jeffrey Epstein, including several individuals whose names and identifying information appear in the subject materials. Whether victims do or do not favor unsealing it is imperative that victims have adequate notice of unsealing and adequate time to respond in advance of disclosure. But the judge says victims did not have sufficient notice before the government filed the instant motions, and therefore that is yet another reason, citing two letters provided to him by the victims. Victims are always being forgotten here by the Trump side of the equation. He calls them hoax. He says there's nothing to see here as if Trump child sex trafficking and pedophilia is run of the mill for Donald Trump, especially when it's committed by his best friends that he's currently covering up for. Signed. In conclusion, for the reasons stated above on page 14 of his order, including the analysis that he did, the motion to unseal the grand jury transcripts and the exhibits In United States vs. Epstein are respectfully denied. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge what happens next? It just, with our help, continues to put pressure on the Trump administration. I mean, we're drilling down on this on a daily basis to force them to release the files that now they're currently trying to use as a pawn. The Oversight Committee and the Democrats on that committee are putting a major pressure on there by trying to. Well, we wanted to release them, but, you know, the committee didn't release them. It's not the committee to release, as this Judge Berman just reminded the Trump administration and the public. It is the Trump administration that is sitting on the treasure trove. It is the Trump administration that has the key in their pocket to unlock the door and release the Epstein files to the public that they claim they were going to do in February until they reverse course in July. And we need judges like Judge Engelmeier and Judge Berman and judge and Judge Rothenberg to join together and say once and for all, release the damn files. Trump administration, don't bark up our tree. Don't look for us to bail you out. And there's not much in the grand jury proceedings anyway. That's why he said it's 70 pages. There were two total witnesses, two total between two grand jury proceedings, one for Maxwell and one for Epstein in New York. Two witnesses. One overlapped. There was. And they were law enforcement witnesses doing summary testimony. There were no victims who testified. There was no testimony about anybody other than Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It was done for the purposes of obtaining an indictment, not an investigation. So there's no there there. That was Donald Trump's major distractor. Hey, look over here. You think the Epstein files is that treasure trove, that mine, that mine field, that, that load mine, load, load mine. There it is. Of materials that we're sitting on. No, it's the 70 pages of the grand jury. Judges look to the judges. Nobody fell for that. It actually backfired spectacularly in Donald Trump's face, as it should. What does the Epstein scandal show about the Trump administration? I'll end it this way. It shows reinforces anyway, the immorality, the depravity, the lack of ethics, the lack of trust that we can repose in this president of the United States whose character demonstrates every moment that he is lawless, that he is unethical, that he is immoral. That's all this demonstrates. And he, he, he should have already disqualified himself from sitting in the Oval Office. And hopefully at the midterm election, we will send that message right back to him. I'm Michael Popo. You're on the Midas Touch Network and Legal af. Take a moment, hit the subscribe button here. Come over to Legal a f the YouTube channel, hit the subscribe button there. This is all for free. And if you really want to help what we do about Legal A on Legal af, come over to Legal AF Substack. I think we're number six and rising in US Politics right now on Substack. All because of you. And hit the paid subscribe button. I think it's $8 a month. You'll get some amazing content. Go take a look at it. You can look at it for free. For now, take a look at Legal AF substack. Until my next report, I'm Michael Pop. Can't get your fill of Legal af. Me neither. That's why we formed the Legal AF Substack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a oral argument, come over to the substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there, including a daily roundup I do call. Wait for it Morning af. What else? All the other contributors from Legal AF are there as well. We got some new reporting, we got interviews, we got ad free versions of the podcast and hot takes where Legal AF on Substack. Come over now to free subscribe.
C
It's that time of year again, back to school season, and Instacart knows that the only thing harder than getting back into the swing of things is is getting all the back to school supplies, snacks and essentials you need. So here's your reminder to make your life a little easier this season. Shop favorites from Staples, Best Buy and Costco, all delivered through Instacart so that you can get some time back and do whatever it is that you need to get your life back on track. Instacart we're here ready to level up.
D
Jumbo Casino is your playbook to fun. It's free to play with no purchase necessary. Enjoy hundreds of casino style games like Bingo, slots and Solitaire anytime, anywhere with fresh release releases every week. Whether you're at home or on the go, let Chumba Casino bring the excitement to you. Plus get free daily login bonuses and a free welcome bonus. Join now for your chance to redeem some serious prizes. Play Chumba Casino today. No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void but prohibited by law. 18 plus TNC supply.
In this episode of Legal AF, the focus is a groundbreaking ruling by Judge Richard Berman involving the Trump administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. The hosts provide detailed analysis of the court order, the ongoing efforts to make Epstein-related investigative files public, and the Trump administration’s repeated attempts to block transparency. The episode explores the legal, political, and ethical implications at the intersection of law, politics, and the pursuit of justice for Epstein’s victims.
Background (00:43):
Political Promise vs. Reality (01:20):
"You're sitting on the treasure trove of information. You're in the best position to release it to the public. Stop barking up the tree of federal judges."
—Michael Popok, paraphrasing Judge Berman (00:43)
"1,000 sex crimes victims have declared in unison, we are not a hoax."
—Michael Popok (03:25)
"How low have you sunk that you need a convicted child sex trafficker to vouch for your credibility, Donald Trump? Pretty low."
—Michael Popok (04:25)
"The government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf...the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials."
—Judge Berman, quoted by Popok (07:45)
"Any disclosure of grand jury material...directly affects their fairness, privacy, conferral and protection guarantees."
—Victims' attorneys, referenced by Popok (10:10)
Pressure on the Trump Administration (11:20):
Deconstruction of Distraction Tactics (13:00):
"It shows the immorality, the depravity, the lack of ethics, the lack of trust that we can repose in this president...he is lawless, he is unethical, he is immoral."
—Michael Popok (14:05)
On the Administration's Motivation:
"The more the Trump administration...tried to cover up the crimes, the more the relationship between Donald Trump and his two best friends, Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and their child sex trafficking...came to the forefront."
—Michael Popok (02:10)
On the Judges' Coordinated Rebuke:
"We need judges like Judge Engelmeier and Judge Berman and Judge Rothenberg to join together and say once and for all, release the damn files."
—Michael Popok (13:45)
On Trump’s Core Deficit:
"He should have already disqualified himself from sitting in the Oval Office."
—Michael Popok (14:10)
This episode offers a comprehensive, pointed legal analysis of the Trump administration’s efforts to obscure the Epstein files, focusing on the substantive failings revealed by judicial orders. The hosts stress the primacy of victim advocates, expose administrative tactics, and urge further public scrutiny. The tone is direct, factual, and unapologetically critical of what they characterize as lawless behavior—delivering a narrative that is both legally rigorous and deeply skeptical of official obfuscation.