Loading summary
Sponsor Voice
This episode is brought to you by Shopify. Upgrade your business with Shopify, home of the number one checkout on the planet. Shop pay boosts conversions up to 50%, meaning fewer carts going abandoned and more sales going cha ching. So if you're into growing your business, get a commerce platform that's ready to sell wherever your customers are. Visit shopify.com to upgrade your selling today.
Ryan Reynolds
This episode is brought to you by Lifelock. During tax season, your personal info travels to a lot of places between payroll, your tax consultant and the IRS. If your W2 gets exposed, that's just the ticket for identity thieves. That's why Lifelock monitors millions of data points every second. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Don't let identity thieves take you for a ride. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast terms apply this episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible financial geniuses, monetary magicians. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds. Visit progressive.com to see if you could save Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations.
Michael Popak
Hablas Espanol Sprito Deutschlandos if you've heard.
Sponsor Voice
That sound from Babbel before, I bet you do. Babbel is the science backed language learning app that actually works with quick 10 minute lessons handcrafted by over 200 language experts. Babbel gets you on your way to speaking a new language in just a few weeks with over 16 million subscriptions sold and a 20 day money back guarantee. Just start speaking another language with Babbel right now. Up to 55 off your Babel subscription at babbel.com Spotify podcast spelled B A B-B-E-L.com Spotify podcast rules and restrictions may apply.
Ryan Reynolds
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying Big Wireless Way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop with Mint. You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying. No judgments. But that's weird. Okay, one judgment anyway. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment.
Sponsor Voice
Of $45 for three month plan equivalent.
Michael Popak
To $15 per month required Intro rate.
Sponsor Voice
First three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com it's time for the.
Michael Popak
Revenge of the DC federal judges against Donald Trump's administration. They're still smarting from the Jan6par. And they're the judges who by and large are going to be making the decisions against Donald Trump effectively for his executive orders that are unconstitutional and illegal. It's time for the revenge of the federal judges in the District of Columbia. I'm Michael Popak. I'm going to do a dive into the 32 cases that have already been filed against the Trump administration in just two weeks and one day that by my math, and I'm no math major, that's more than two lawsuits a day already in this administration. And. And rule of law is winning with three temporary restraining orders. Of those 32 cases, 15 are in the District of Columbia. I'll tell you why that matters. You're on the Midas Touch Network and Legal af. Let's do a deep dive. I joked early on, starting in Jan.20, that we were going to see at least, at least three to four times as many lawsuits filed against the Trump administration as in his first term. There were over a thousand cases filed in his first term, and the attorneys general and public interest groups back then had an 80% winning percentage. Now, I said, because of Donald Trump and his grand schemes that are insane. That, or as Chris Murphy, the senator, Democratic senator, put it, he's losing it and therefore creating a pariah state out of the United States around the world that we were gonna see three to four times that amount. And if we do the math on that, that meant somewhere between three to four lawsuits a day every day until the end of his administration. We're already getting there, right? That glass is already half full with 32 lawsuits. I'm gonna go over broadly those lawsuits. I'm gonna tell you about the revenge of the D.C. federal judges because 15 out of 32 of those cases are before them. All those judges that either handled cases involving Donald Trump or the Jan6ins. Remember, more than 1600 cases went through one courthouse. I mean, it was unprecedented. It was the largest investigation and prosecution operation of the FBI and the Department of Justice in our history. And where, what judges handled that? One courthouse, one place, District of Columbia. Every judge in the District of Columbia handled one, not one, multiple dozens of Jan6 cases. They did it from bench trials where they handled the trial themselves. They did it from presiding over jury trials. They did the sentencing, and they dealt with the aftermath of the pardons. None of them were happy about the pardons. There was no MAGA DC Federal judge that was excited about the pardons. All of them objected to them and felt it was against the rule of law. Sent a Terrible message and was an insult and disrespect to the jury process and to the judges. Yeah. And so now they're the same judges in these civil cases. Remember, these are civil, not criminal cases that are being brought against Donald Trump's executive orders. He only issued about 30 of them. He's already got 32 lawsuits. Multiple lawsuits being filed by public interest groups, Democracy forward with Norm, Ison, the ACLU, the NAACP, 22 different states and their attorneys general, all bringing cases around the country, but primarily in the District of Columbia. I'll talk about the other places cases have been filed and their common denominator. The common denominator among all 32 is that they're in democratic and rule of law friendly jurisdictions. I never thought I'd have to call a federal court a rule of law friendly. They shouldn't. They all be rule of law friendly, but they're not. And so strategically, tactically, the Democrats and other progressives that are bringing these lawsuits and winning, and winning. Three temporary restraining orders already. We'll be getting temporary restraining orders by the day, actually, Sorry, four temporary restraining orders because one came in late last night with Judge Lamperth in the District of Columbia about housing men who transition to transgender women being housed in prisons with men. That's now stopped by a temporary restraining order. So we have four restraining orders out of 32 cases with more to come. Some class action, some direct action, some. Some seeking temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions, some not seeking it, some seeking declarations or money damages. Depends on the type of case. Let's look at the 32 cases. The common denominator, rule of law, favorable judges in states along the Northeast and the Pacific Northwest, and staying away from red states. Okay. And red state appellate courts. 32 lawsuits. Let's go. Birthright citizenship. That was the first executive order that was challenged. Many of these lawsuits were filed on January 20, the day of the inauguration, the first day in office for Donald Trump, first day on the job, and some just days later, all the way up and through. As I said yesterday and today, we have seven different cases filed on birthright citizenship. Listen to the states. New Hampshire, two in Massachusetts, Maryland, Washington and Washington state, Northern California and D.C. okay. And you know, for instance, in D.C. the federal judge is, is Emmett Sullivan, senior status judge, very not in favor of Donald Trump. We already have a temporary restraining order issued by Judge Kofanor in Seattle, Washington, stopping birthright citizenship, while New Hampshire looks at the same issue, but there are seven cases. The reason? It's a portfolio method. You first of all, these are different groups representing different interests. Some are attorneys general. Some, in the case of birthright citizenship, are actual people who are here with babies who were born on U.S. soil that are now being denied U.S. citizenship. You flood the zone, you file seven cases, you hope to get a number of really good cases, and whoever gives you the best decision, you'll rally behind that judge. It is forum shopping, and I don't care. This is the way it works. So right now, I think we're gonna go 70 in those cases. If you only filed one case and you got a crappy judge or crappy rule and you're stuck with it, file seven cases, you got seven different decisions. Sanctuary cities and Donald Trump's efforts to go after sanctuary cities. This is under immigration, in immigration alone, about sanctuary cities, about chasing undocumented through churches and schools in raids, whether that's legal or not. Going after the closing of the website to schedule appointments. On the, on the, on the southern border, there are six different cases against various aspects of Donald Trump's immigration policy. By executive order, we've got four of them in the District of Columbia. Right back to my majority in District of Columbia, one in the Northern District of Illinois, one in Maryland, and yeah. Now let's go on to issues related to Donald Trump trying to fire civil servants under schedule F or otherwise. There are three of those cases. Two are in the District of Columbia, one is in Maryland. Attacks on Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency. Either him trying to get into. He's already done it. Get into the Bureau of Financial Services, which handles $5 trillion worth of payments, including Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, disability, food stamps, student loans, everything that the federal government pays to its citizens who have earned it. I used the term last night in Popoc Life, which we've always referred to it in shorthand as entitlements. Entitlements doesn't mean like you're. You feel like you're entitled, you know, like a snowflake Gen Z thing. It means you're entitled to it. You've earned it. That's why that term came out. And whatever you call it, it's those benefits that are paid out by Congress allocation that, that Elon Musk has thrown his hands in, gotten control of the software turned over to him by the Treasury Secretary, Steve Bessant, all in violation of law, all in violation of the Constitution, the Appropriations Act, Separation and Powers act, the Administrative Procedures act, the First Amendment, you name it. Yeah. So we've got Doge, Elon Musk, suits. He's hooked up to the Office of Personnel Management. He's sending out emails about deleting this agency like USAID deleting these people, deleting this DEI or this WOKE agency all illegally hooking up to a server he shouldn't be hooked up to.
Honeylove Representative
I haven't been this excited by a new sponsor in a long time. Honeylove Shapewear it looks and feels amazing and makes me feel and look my best. It gives me a little extra help in the areas I need it and it's so comfortable I can literally wear it every day. I've tried other shapewear products and none of them are as comfortable and at the same time as effective as Honey Love. So get support where you need it and not where you don't. It's lightweight, breathable and looks like lingerie. So with wedding season here, I actually wore my new Honey Love to a wedding and it was beyond perfect. I don't have to be afraid of tight dresses or any those little lumps and bumps, you know what I'm talking about showing. Plus it lifts you all in the right all the places, if you know what I mean. So with Honey Love you can feel your best even when you're wearing less. They use targeted compression to enhance your curves instead of squeezing them. You'll feel hugged and not suffocated. Whether you're a bride, a guest or looking for an extra confidence in everyday life, Honey Love is your your go to for all things shapewear. Plus it's the only shapewear that won't ever roll down no matter how much time you spend on the dance floor. Honey Love shapewear features lingerie, inspired design and it detail. There are details that you'll want to show off and it's made with breathable fabric that keeps you nice and cool. So for a limited time only you can get Honey Love on sale. Get 20% off your entire order with our exclusive link honeylove.com legalaf support our show. Check them out at honeylove. It's honeylove.com forward/legal a f treat yourself to the best bras and shapewear on the market and save 20% off@honeylove.com legal a f thank you so much for supporting our show.
Michael Popak
Honey Love so there are five different lawsuits against Elon Musk and Donald Trump as a result, all in the District of Columbia about the attempted impoundment of federal funds, the freezing of funds to states for state run programs to help the impoverished, the underprivileged and the rest and not for profit grants that go to not for profit organizations that do the lion's share of helping the poor and the working poor in this country, cutting off that funding. That resulted in a case in Rhode island and a case in the District of Columbia and two trp. Then on, pardon me, on transgender issues, we've got three cases in the District of Columbia and one in Maryland. In the District of Columbia case, Royce Lamperth, a Republican appointed judge in District of Columbia, just last night issued a temporary restraining order to stop Donald Trump from having his Bureau of Prisons take transgender women and put them in male prisons. How well do you think that's going to go before somebody is murdered, raped, both or worse in a male prison, as opposed to housing them with their gender identity, which is, and of course, cutting off their gender affirming care. So things related to transgender and gender affirming care, cutting off teenagers who are in midst of transition from medical care, cutting and doing this just basically wanting to kill an entire population of transgender prisoners as completely, not only arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedures act, but inhumane. Right? As inhumane as that is as a constitutional violation against due process, against civil liberties and civil rights. Three cases in the District of Columbia, one case in Maryland. So when you total it all up, 15 cases in D.C. now, let's talk about that. Firstly, the reads of the common denominator. As I said, these are all fair minded, moderate to Democratic strongholds. That's why these cases are being filed there. And they report into appellate courts that we have confidence in the 9th Circuit, which although got a little trumpy during his first term, is now, you know, on, basically, on balance, still more Democrat than Republican. So you got the 9th Circuit covering Washington, Oregon and California. You've got the 1st Circuit which covers like upper New England, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, that type of thing. Then you got the first drop down in New York. You've got the Second Circuit, which covers that area, the Third Circuit which covers New Jersey and Connecticut, that type of thing. And the, and the in Maryland. Then you've got the District of Columbia and it has its own appellate court. And that's where we're living. We're living in the 9th, the 1st, the 2nd, the 3rd, the 4th, the DCs. Right. We're staying away from the 5th Circuit out of Louisiana and Texas, the 11th Circuit out of Georgia and Florida. Yeah, we're staying away from the red state strongholds because not only do those are those appellate courts favorable to us, but the Supreme Court justices responsible for those appellate courts are also the democratically appointed ones. So that's the first step in the trade on appeal. And most of these cases are going to be attempted to go to the United States Supreme Court. They won't all be successful. Supreme Court takes 60. All right, let's make it 70 this term. Cases. That's it. Out of thousands and thousands that are filed, as you can see. Now, here's the revenge element of the hot take. Every one of these cases will touch on the District of Columbia in one way or the other through multiple filings or because exclusively in the District of Columbia, those are the same judges that watched with, with horror jan6 happen in real time, as in Washington, the immediate arraignment of the Jan6 insurrectionist, the investigation by the special counsel, what happened to Tanya Chutkin, the judge presiding over the D.C. election interference case. And they all had shock and horror over what they watched, that the Department of Justice presented in terms of the violence and the carnage on January 6, that they presided over, that they heard in evidence as the trier of fact in a bench trial or presided over in a jury trial and handled the sentencing of it and were in horror and in shock when the pardons happened and said it was wrong out loud and are still resisting. They're still resisting. There are still judges that are handling issues related to Jan6 insurrectionists. And what are they doing about it? They're saying things like, well, you're still on probation or I'm dismissing the indictment, but only without prejudice. Maybe another Department of Justice will indict you again. And that's how they're doing their profile in courage. So I'm telling you now, watch for the D.C. federal courts that have an ax to grind against Donald Trump and they're going to take it out on him now with his executive orders. And if 20 or 25 or so executive orders resulted in 32 cases, you can do the math. Now, Donald Trump's been sort of slowing down on his executive orders, but there's going to be more to come. And it's these courts, the ones I've already outlined for you and the judges I've already outlined for you. Ali Khan in DC coffin or in Seattle, McConnell in Rhode Island. And wait till Judge Chutkan in DC gets assigned her case. Emmett Sullivan in the District of Columbia, Amy Berman Jackson in the District of Columbia, Amit Mehta. These are the people that preside. Amit Mehta presided over the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers. Proud boys leader got 22 years before he was Pardoned by Donald Trump, Oath Keeper 18 years before he was pardoned by Donald Trump. You don't think Amit Mehta is ready to take on executive orders? And this is our dream. I mean, it's a nightmare. But the silver lining of the nightmare is that Donald Trump can only rule by executive order, and that is where we get him. Because these executive orders violate the Constitution, they violate the 14th Amendment, they violate due process, they violate the First Amendment, they violate the Administrative Procedures act or all five of those things at the same time. And the Supreme Court, as much as they bent over backwards to help a criminal president on the criminal side, hate executive orders, it's the, it's the least enforced item that a president can do because they look to Congress for, for law, right? You know, about appropriations, about funding, about immigration, big major issues. They look to Congress. They don't like presidents issuing executive orders and acting like they're legislators. So we will see. Not all of these cases I've just described are going to get up to the Supreme Court. Some of them, the final ruling is going to be at the appellate level, just before the Supreme Court. And that's what we're banking on also, because the Supreme Court doesn't is not going to take, you know, the 4,000 cases. Ultimately, they're going to be filed against the Trump administration by all these groups. Maybe over the course of four years, maybe they'll take 200 cases, maybe the rest. The last word is going to be these appellate courts, the Ninth Circuit, the First Circuit, the Second Circuit, the Third Circuit, the D.C. court of Appeals, and we're here for it. Join Legal AF, the YouTube channel. Right now. Right now you've got, if we're doing two to three cases a day, you got to go there for the unpacking, for the unveiling, for the analysis and the commentary. Legal AF mtn free. Subscribe over there and watch my work here on the Midas Touch Network, Popoc Live Tuesday nights at 8:00pm Eastern Time right here on this YouTube channel. New podcast Wednesdays and Saturdays, it's Legal AF, the podcast channel, or the YouTube channel for the podcast and audio podcast platforms of your choice. And then all the work we're doing over 8, 9, 10 times a day on legal AF. So until my next reporting, this is Michael Popak. In collaboration with the Midas Touch Network, we just launched the Legal AF YouTube channel. Help us build this pro democracy channel where I'll be curating the top stories, the intersection of law and politics. Go to YouTube now and free subscribe at legal a FMTN that's eagle afmtn.
Libsyn Ads Representative
Marketing is hard, but I'll tell you a little secret. It doesn't have to be. Let me point something out. You're listening to a podcast right now and it's great. You love the host. You seek it out and download it. You listen to it while driving, working out, cooking, even going to the bathroom. Podcasts are a pretty close companion. And this is a podcast ad. Did I get your attention? You can reach great listeners like yourself with podcast advertising from Libsyn Ads. Choose from hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements, or run a pre produced ad like this one across thousands of shows. To reach your target audience in their favorite podcasts with Libsyn Ads, go to Libsyn ads.com that's L I B S Y N ads.com today.
Release Date: February 8, 2025
Hosts: Ben Meiselas, Michael Popok, Karen Friedman Agnifilo
Executive Producer: Meidas Media Network
In the February 8, 2025 episode of Legal AF by MeidasTouch, host Michael Popak delves deep into the escalating legal battles against former President Donald Trump. Titled "PISSED OFF Judges GET REVENGE on Trump FINALLY," the episode explores the surge of lawsuits challenging Trump’s executive orders and actions, highlighting the pivotal role of federal judges in these confrontations.
Michael Popak begins by outlining a significant increase in legal actions against Trump’s administration. As of the episode’s release, 32 cases had been filed within just over two weeks, averaging more than two lawsuits per day.
“There are 32 cases that have already been filed against the Trump administration in just two weeks and one day… that's more than two lawsuits a day already in this administration.”
(02:23)
Popak contrasts this with Trump's first term, during which over a thousand cases were filed with an 80% win rate by attorneys general and public interest groups. However, he anticipates a dramatic shift due to Trump's "insane" strategies, predicting a three to fourfold increase in lawsuits—a trend already evident.
A central theme of the episode is the revenge sought by D.C. federal judges against Trump. Popak emphasizes that 15 out of the 32 cases are being heard in the District of Columbia, a region with a history of vigilant judiciary actions post-January 6th (Jan6).
“These are the same judges that… handled the Jan6 cases… None of them were happy about the pardons. They felt it was against the rule of law.”
(04:10)
These judges, having overseen the unprecedented 1,600 Jan6 cases, are now channeling their frustration into judicial decisions against Trump's executive orders. Popak highlights that these judges are largely Democratic or rule-of-law friendly, operating in jurisdictions that are less likely to favor Trump's agendas.
Trump’s administration has issued approximately 30 executive orders, many of which Popak argues are unconstitutional or illegal. The 32 lawsuits target various aspects of these orders, including:
Birthright Citizenship:
“A temporary restraining order issued by Judge Kofanor… stopping birthright citizenship.”
(06:45)
Immigration and Sanctuary Cities:
Firing Civil Servants and Impounding Federal Funds:
Attacks on Elon Musk:
Transgender Rights in Prisons:
“Transgender women being housed in male prisons is completely... inhumane.”
(09:15)
Popak underscores that these lawsuits are not isolated but part of a coordinated legal strategy aiming to dismantle Trump’s executive initiatives by overwhelming the judiciary system with challenges.
The episode sheds light on the judicial outlook towards Trump’s actions. Many D.C. judges, having witnessed the aftermath of the Jan6 insurrection, are determined to uphold the rule of law and counteract Trump’s perceived overreach.
“These judges… handle cases from bench trials to sentencing… They are still resisting Trump’s attempts and are taking it out on his executive orders.”
(10:25)
Popak forecasts that while not all cases will ascend to the Supreme Court, a significant number will reach the appellate level within democratic-leaning circuits like the 9th, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Circuits. He anticipates that the Supreme Court may take up to 70 cases over the term, although many rulings will be finalized before reaching the highest court.
Popak elaborates on the strategic litigation employed by Democrats and other progressive groups:
This method ensures that even if some cases fail, others will succeed, thereby establishing a robust legal framework to curtail Trump's authority.
“This is forum shopping, and I don’t care. This is the way it works.”
(07:30)
The long-term implications include:
As the episode wraps up, Popak emphasizes the relentless nature of these legal battles. He predicts that as long as Trump issues executive orders that overstep legal boundaries, the judiciary will continue to serve as a formidable counterforce.
“Donald Trump can only rule by executive order, and that is where we get him.”
(19:50)
Popak encourages listeners to stay informed through the Legal AF YouTube channel and other platforms, ensuring ongoing analysis and commentary on the evolving legal landscape.
“Join Legal AF… Subscribe over there and watch my work here on the Midas Touch Network.”
(20:45)
For those interested in the intersection of law and politics, this episode offers a comprehensive analysis of the legal strategies employed against a former president and the judiciary's role in upholding democratic principles.