Transcript
A (0:00)
This podcast is supported by MIDI Health. Are you in midlife feeling dismissed, unheard or just plain tired of the old health care system? You're not alone. For too long, women's serious midlife health issues have been trivialized, ignored and met with a just deal with it attitude. Many of us have been made to feel ashamed or forgotten. In fact, even today, 75% of women seeking care for menopause and perimenopause issues are left entirely untreated. But here's the powerful truth. It's time for a change. It's time for miti. MITI is not just a healthcare provider, it's a women's telehealth clinic founded and supported by world class leaders in women's health. What sets MIDI apart? We are the only women's telehealth brand covered by major insurance companies, making high quality, expert care accessible and affordable for all women everywhere. Our clinicians provide one on one face to face consultations where they truly listen to your unique needs. We offer a full range of holistic, data driven solutions from hormonal therapies and weight loss protocols to lifestyle coaching and preventive health guidance. This isn't a one size fits all care. This is care uniquely tailored for you. At miti, you will join our patients who feel seen, heard and prioritized. You will find that our mission is clear to help all women thrive in midlife, giving them access to the health care they deserve. Because we believe midlife isn't the middle at all. It's just the beginning of your second act. Ready to feel your best and write your second act script? Visit joinmitty.com today to book your personalized insurance covered virtual visit. That's joinmitte.com Mitty the Care Women Deserve.
B (1:46)
Well, in breaking news and at least a preliminary win for the independence of the Federal Reserve, the Supreme Court has just ruled in a one line order that Lisa Cook is not going to be removed from her position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve because Donald Trump says so to destroy the independence of the Federal Reserve to give him control over interest rates. Ultimately, because they want to have oral argument, they want to have full briefing and they want to take up the matter in January of 2026. She stays in the job as Board of Governor member until then, which means she's going to participate in the October rate setting meeting, the one in November and the one in December to set interest rates in this country. Which is for now at least a preliminary support for the independence of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors Trump won't be happy about this. Let me break it down for you here on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal af. I'm Michael Popak. Lisa Cook is one of seven of the seven members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, which is our central bank which sets monetary policy and particularly wields one major blunt force instrument. It sets intra bank overnight interest rates, which then cascade down through interest rate setting among banks for personal loans, mortgages, student loans, credit card debt and all of that. It's one way for the Federal Reserve to promote jobs while keeping inflation low. The Donald Trump hasn't liked the rate of inflate the rate of interest that the Federal Reserve has charged because it is not giving enough free money into the economy to help paper over his failed economic policy. So he's tried to attack the independence of the Federal Reserve. He's done that in multitude of ways. First he went after Jay Powell, the Federal Reserve chairperson, accused him of fraud or waste related to the building of some buildings for the Federal Reserve. When that didn't work, he turned his attention to Lisa Cook, came up with some phony framed allegations that she took out two loans, one for a home in Ann Arbor, Michigan and one for a home in Atlanta, and she listed them both as her primary residences, presumably to get an interest rate cut. Turns out none of that is true. Didn't stop Donald Trump from effectively social media posting that she was fired, not giving her any due process. And the Supreme Court has already said in May in a case we call Wilcox v. Trump, that Donald Trump cannot at will fire a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. He has to have for cause reason, which means she's done something bad while in the job generally. He then took an appeal to the D.C. federal Appellate Court and lost 2 to 1. He then took an emergency appeal Trump did to the United States Supreme Court. And we've been waiting after full briefing several days ago for the ruling. The issue before the Supreme Court that they just ruled on is whether the stay that Donald Trump is seeking to remove her from her job, change the status quo and let them litigate on a full appeal about whether he had for cause or not, whether she got due process or not, whether he should be allowed to take her out of her job right now. And now based on this ruling, which I'll read to you, the Supreme Court has said that she's staying at her job until at least January. This is the docket entry and this is the entirety of it. We'll put it up on the screen. The application for stay presented to the Chief Justice. That's by Donald Trump asking for the stay of the injunction that kept her in her chair issued by Judge Cobb at the trial court level that's been referred to the court is deferred pending oral argument in January 2026. The clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to establish a briefing schedule for amicus curi. That's friends of the court briefs. I'll talk about that in a minute. And any supplemental briefs responding to the amici. What does that mean? That means Donald Trump didn't get his stay, didn't take her out of her chair. She remains on the Board of Governors, which is a good thing through January in an oral argument and some ruling thereafter. We probably won't get the results of the Lisa Cook oral argument on this day until sometime in February or March of 2026. The longer she stays in the job, the better it is for her legal position, the better it is for her facts supporting her legal position, and the better it is for the American economy. And I think knowing that there doesn't seem there weren't at least five votes even among the magus six on the Supreme Court to reward Donald Trump for his violating effectively their May decision not to fire Federal Reserve personnel without for cause and do it through due process.