Loading summary
Transcript1 lines
- [00:00]
A
Leave it to Todd Blanche to continue to skate on thin ice. He can't even get the 12 or 11 votes he needs to get out of the Senate Judiciary Committee and be confirmed as the Attorney General. And he's still picking fights with federal judges after US Attorneys are being wrongly fired under the Federal Vacancy Reform Act. You'd think he'd pick his battles, right? Well, he's not completely in charge of the Department of Justice, and we know that. Right, which explains why he's fighting with Judge Bastian. Judge Bastian is the Chief Judge of the Eastern District, but came in to cover a case in the Western District involving Roger Rogoff, who is the appointed U.S. attorney appointed by the District court judges of the, of the Western District of Washington because there was a vacancy because Donald Trump's person that he picked couldn't get confirmed. And 120 days expired. And under the Federal Vacancy Reform act, it's up to the district court judges to pick the sitting U.S. attorney until the President gets around to getting somebody confirmed through the Senate. You see how hard it is for Donald Trump to get anybody confirmed by the Judiciary Committee. Right. And so instead of just giving up, the original judge in the case recused himself, disqualified himself, you know, said, I'm not going to do this case. I'm in the Eastern. I'm sorry, I'm in the Western District of, of the, of the court. I voted to place Mr. Rogoff in his position. I don't feel right about it. So he made a recommendation that it go to a judge from the, from the Eastern District of Washington who sits occasionally in the Western District and hears cases, but did not vote. Did not vote on Rogoff. Guy name John. Judge Bastian, who was appointed by Barack Obama and the head of the ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sitting in San Francisco approved of it. That's all recited in the motion filed by the government. So the government files a motion saying, no, no, Judge Bastian should not have picked and the prior judge should not have been involved with picking his replacement. That's improper. That's against ninth Circuit principles. That's wrong. We want to get rid of Judge Bastian. They don't want an Obama appointed judge making the about Rogloff. They just won't say that out loud. And now we've got the new order from Judge Bastian just less than 24 hours after the motion to have him disqualified and removed was filed. No, I'm not removing myself. See, that motion goes to Judge Bastian and if they don't like it, they can take the appeal to the Ninth Circuit, but I don't think they're going to win there either. I'm Michael Popo. You're on Midas Touch in Legal af. Take a minute, hit the free subscribe button. As you can tell from the dogs in the background, I'm on holiday, but law and politics don't take a break, so I can't either. Let's go to the actual filings so I can bring you up to date about what this is all about. See, Roger Rogoff brought a motion for preliminary injunction to block him from from to block the fact that he was being fired. He got fired moments minutes after the district court judges had appointed him. Now, this happened before in New Jersey and almost identically within 48 hours after the pick Donald Trump fired that pick by the district court judge and shoved in Alina Haba, which led to Alina Haba eventually resigning in disgrace. So that didn't go over well. Let me read to you from the two documents two pieces of paper which are really important here. The first one is the original motion and then I'll read to you from the order of judge of Judge Bastian in the case. So this was the original filing by the government by the Department of Justice. Donald Trump and Blanche file defendant's suggestion of reassignment by ninth Circuit order. And in the alternative of recusal, they say that the when the judge assigned to the case disqualified himself, he needs to simply step aside and not be involved in the process of picking his replacement. Now, the reason that the person stepped aside, the judge, is because he voted for Rogoff and so he didn't think it was right to continue to adjudicate. Whether Rogoff was properly fired or not doesn't mean that he couldn't have under 9th Circuit precedent, he couldn't have a role in the replacement. So on July 21, Rogoff filed a complaint in the court. They say in their filing on page three, it was in a motion for preliminary assignment. It was assigned to the Honorable Ricardo Martinez, who entered a minute order that said he recuses himself and is hereby transferring it to a judge from outside the district. Consistent with the with the 9th Circuit's December 10, 2025 memo of the 9th Circuit judge. He then made a designation of the chief judge of the Eastern District of Washington, same state but different district of Stanley Bastian, who regularly serves as an as needed basis as a district judge but did not vote for Rogoff. And that designation even conceded by the Trump administration on page four was signed by Judge Merguia of the U.S. court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Who's the guy who's responsible for appointing the new person? So, like, what is the beef? The 9th Circuit Chief Judge approved of the assignment, implicitly approving that this was proper procedure under 9th Circuit law. But oh no, they want a new judge picked. What they won't say out loud is the reason they want the new judge picked is because Bastian is a Democrat. Obama appointed judge, plain and simple. I was a senior executive in my career. Today's executives are more threatened, more exposed, and more vulnerable than ever before. Corporations spend billions on workplace security. But what happens when a threat finds your executives outside the office? Here's why that matters. 70% of attacks on executives happen at home or away from the office, and Ironwall understands a terrifying reality. If someone has a grievance against your company, the first place they turn to is Google. It takes about five minutes to find one of your executive's home addresses online. And if their personal information is sitting on the open web, they're far too easy to find. You're leaving them unprotected. The team at Ironwall knows this better than anyone. They protected some of the most targeted executives and individuals on the planet for almost two decades. As a white glove enterprise security service, they protect your people with continuous personal data removal, proactive prevention tools, and emergency support. So when someone goes looking for your executives, Ironwall ensures they hit a dead end. So here's what to do. Go to ironwall.com legal AF Fill in the quick form and request your free risk assessment. Their team will show you just how exposed your executives are and how to lock it down before a threat reaches their front door. That's ironwall.com legalif stop online threats before they become real world attacks. Check for the link in the show notes below. So Judge Bastian, within hours, entered the following Order Order and we're going to put all this up on Legal AF substack for you to read. Order denying the motion for reassignment or recusal. And here's what it says. This case was filed on July 21 in the Western District of Washington and was assigned to Ricardo Martinez. He recused himself and the case was reassigned to this court by minute order. Defendant takes issue with the reassignment, asserting that allowing Judge Martinez to recuse himself and reassign the case was somehow improper. Although other districts may have chosen to handle the reassignment in a different matter, there is no binding precedent or rule that states that reassignment must follow a certain procedure, and having the assigned judge enter the reassignment order is consistent with Western District of Washington practices. Next, the defendant suggests the scorcher accused itself based on its preexisting and continuing service in the Western District of Washington as a regular visiting judge. Defendants provide no binding authority that would require recusal, and the court is aware of no such authority. In the absence of a legitimate reason to recuse oneself, a judge should participate in cases assigned. That is from United States versus Holland, a United States Supreme Court case from 2008. Therefore, he continues, this court took an oath to administer justice without respect to persons and to faithfully, impartially discharge and perform all duties incumbent upon it, and it intends to fully honor that oath. The court will proceed as always, pursuant to its obligation to treat all parties fairly and to decide all issues fairly and equitably based on the law and and the facts. Defendants motion for reassignment and alternatively for a recusal is denied. It is so ordered. And Stanley Bastian. Now, what's going to happen next? What should happen next is Todd Blanche takes a loss for an answer and leaves this one alone. But you know what's going to happen? They're going to try to file something with the Ninth Circuit, even though the chief judge of the ninth Circuit already approved of Bastion being appointed. Talk about not leaving well enough alone or hitting rock bottom and continuing to dig. As we're watching with Todd Blanche, by the way, Todd, this is the one of many reasons that people oppose you to be Attorney General because of the ridiculousness and superciliousness of the positions that you take in bad faith in front of federal judges. Like, knock it off. It's not helping. You're not winning. You're, you're losing. And the more that you're seen as a loser, the more your patron, Donald Trump is going to walk away from you. And, you know, I joked in a recent hot take about, you know, it's starting to sound a lot like when an owner of a sports team, you know, gives like, damning faint praise about a coach. Well, we're not going to make a big change during the year. We think, we think coach is doing a pretty good job. And I'm not, I'm not inclined to make a move. And, you know, two days later, the coach takes the podium and says he needs to spend more time with his family. Oh, family man. I think we're starting. Tom Blanche might be holding I'm a Family man press conference sooner than he might have thought. I'm Michael Popak. You're on the Midas Touch Network and Unlegal af. Take a moment, hit that free subscribe button. Help us to continue to grow our pro democracy channel. Till my next report, this is Michael. In collaboration with the Midas Touch Network, we just launched the Legal AF YouTube channel. Help us build this pro democracy channel where I'll be curating the top stories, the intersection of law and Politics. Go to YouTube now and free subscribe at Legal AFMTN. That's @legal AFMTN.