Loading summary
Advertiser
Imagine you're a business owner relying on a dozen different software programs. Each one is expensive, overly complicated, and worst of all, none of them are connected. It can be incredibly stressful right now. Picture Odoo CRM Accounting, Inventory, manufacturing, Marketing, HR and more. Odoo brings all the tools your business needs into one simple platform and all seamlessly connected. Everything works together, giving you the peace of mind that your business is running smoothly from every angle. Odoo's open source applications are user friendly and designed to scale with your business, saving you time and money. Say goodbye to juggling multiple platforms and hello to efficient integrated management. Stop wasting resources on complicated systems and make the switch to odoo today. Visit odoo.com o d o o.com and discover how Odoo can simplify and streamline your business operations. Odoo Modern Management Made simple from unsolved mysteries to unexplained phenomena from comedy gold to relationship fails Amazon Music's got the most ad free top podcasts included with prime because the only thing that should interrupt your listening is. Well, nothing. Download the Amazon Music app today.
Michael Popak
Who is embroiled in more scandals in the Trump administration than Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick? And that's saying a lot for a scandal ridden administration. I mean you've got the sex scandal swirling around Kristi Noem, another sex scandal swirling around the Labor Secretary, the child sex trafficking scandal and cover up of the COVID up by the Trump administration and the list goes on. And now you've got Howard Lutnick right in the middle of it. Besides the fact he's pissing everybody off in the administration because of his grandstanding, he's also off Donald Trump according to reporting, who's not happy that there is a family profiting on the Trump brand that's not named Donald Trump or his family. And now that there's been reporting that the family office that Howard Lutnick used to own and now has his two 30 year old son's run for him called Cantor Fitzgerald that it profited to the tune of 25% increase just last year 2025 according to reporting and Politico. The there was a fallout between Trump and Lutnick about how much money his family's making off the back of Donald Trump. Now you've got the latest scandal. Inconsistent with how much money the family is making is the fact that it looks like they bet against the tariffs. The very tariffs that Dadd Nick was busy telling the American people back in April of 2025 would be their liberation day. And would be their ticket and path to success. At the same time, probably knowing that the United States Supreme Court was going to rip down those tariffs. Daddy Lutnick's company bet against the tariffs. In other words, they were willing to buy from people who had to overpay for refunds that were eventually found to be unconstitutional by them. For cents on the dollar, an arbitrage if, oh, you got $10 million in refund coming your way, we'll give you 3 million for it. We'll keep the other seven. We'll give you instant cash now. We'll hold on to the rest. And now Jamie Raskin, who's the ranking member of the House Democrats and Judiciary Committee, has opened up a investigation into Mr. Lutnick, sending a strongly worded letter calling him in for testimony along with his son Brandon. I'm Michael Popak. You're on the Midas Touch Network. Full disclosure, I used to work at Canter Fitzgerald about six years ago. I don't have any insider knowledge about this story, but I did work for Howard Lutnick. All right, let's move on. In the storytelling on Lutnick seems to be rubbing a lot of people the wrong way. No surprise there. Within the administration, he was, he was the head of Trump's transition team to come into the White House. He really wanted the Treasury Secretary position and he didn't get it. His consolation prize, all to our detriment, is he got the Commerce Secretary position. But he's had a kind of a sandpapery relationship with many people in the administration because of his grandstand. He tries to take credit for trade deals and other deals that are not his, where he comes in at the last minute, not really understanding the full details. And then everybody's gotta clean up behind the elephant, clean up the mess that he's created. He's also having difficulty delivering on Donald Trump's promise to the American people of an $18 trillion foreign investment in America because of the use of the tariffs. Of course, that number keeps dwindling. And it looks like a lot of that number is not going to manifest itself or is connected to Joe Biden's presidency. So besides the fact he can't deliver on the $18 trillion of investment, or he points to projects that were actually created under somebody, some other president's watch, now we've got the profiting on the unconstitutionality of a very thing that he was a champion of. Who can forget, because he won't let you forget how many times Howard Lutnick has gone on cnbc and other other news media to talk about how great the tariffs are. Who can forget this?
Podcast Host
Play the clip when we say we're going to charge a tariff and other countries who lean on us, who rely on us, who can't live without the oxygen that is our economy. Because remember, the thing about our economy is while we have a $29 trillion GDP, we are the consumer of 20 trillion. Yeah, right. And this is the key thing. We buy everybody's stuff. So who's more important? Let's say they have an economy that produces stuff and we have an economy that buys stuff. The customer is always right. We all know the customer is always right because if no one buys it, they can't produce it.
Michael Popak
Right.
Podcast Host
So everybody needs our economy.
Advertiser
When?
Podcast Host
Now? I mean, to the fact that China consumes less than 10 trillion and primarily tries to figure out how to sell it to itself.
Michael Popak
Right.
Podcast Host
So they don't buy anybody else's.
Michael Popak
Right.
Podcast Host
So we are the world's consumer. Yeah, we're the world's customer. We want them to come here. And if they can't come here, what if you pass?
Michael Popak
Well, Jamie Raskin, friend of the pod, is not ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, is not forgetting and he wrote a letter. Now this is follow up to a letter and an inquiry that was made several months ago by Elizabeth Warren in the Senate in which there was word coming out of a magazine called Wired, sort of an expose that they had gotten their hands on an actual Cantor Fitzgerald letterhead document sent out that suggested or indicated that they had already done a trade, that they had bought maybe $10 million worth of tariff refunds for cents on the dollar. And yet every spokesperson at Canter, Fitzgerald and Howard Lutnig's own office deny that that happened. And Raskin wants answers. He says for months Cantor Fitzgerald has reportedly been buying up the rights to collect potential tariff refunds from from American importers for 20 to 30 cents on the dollar, in effect betting that the company would be forced to refund those tariffs back to injured American companies. A letter from the firm Cantor Fitzgerald reviewed by Wired described this approach in detail that they would pay cents on the dollar. The same letter boasted that the firm had already put a trade through, had already put a trade through, representing about $10 million of IIPA rights, the International Economic Emergency Powers act, and that the capacity to trade up to several hundred million dollars of these are likely and can upsize even that. So which is it, Lutnick and Cantor Fitzgerald? Are you not doing the deals or have you already done the deals? Here's what he says on page two at the same time, Secretary Lutnick, you've been a key architect and cheerleader in chief of the administration's tariff policy. You participated in the losing strategy of bypassing Congress to unilaterally impose tariffs despite and you had an insider's view of the tariffs, profound legal vulnerability, the administration's weak litigation hand. In other words, he had inside knowledge that they were going to fail. That potential conflict of interest raises some troubling questions of federal ethics and insider trading. Was the Lutnick family's cornering of the market in this doomed endeavor a mere coincidence or something more orchestrated? The firm has so then they talk about the Wired article says that a Cantor spokesperson recently denied that there's ever been a trade. Yet the Wired magazine article, based on a letter that they reviewed, said the firm had already put a trade through worth $10 million. The firm has subsequently claimed that a salesman had erroneously believed the firm was going to greenlight the transaction. But that is not what the letters said. A firm cannot simultaneously have never executed any transactions in this market and have already put through a trade. Which is it? The American people deserve to know whether the administration insiders and their closest family members deliberately position themselves to profit from these blatantly illegal tariffs while everybody else paid the price. All right, time for a quick break. We've been really interested in the science behind Oneskin lately. It's a science driven skincare brand built around their OS1 peptide, developed by longevity scientists and designed to target visible signs of aging while simplifying your routine with dermatologist tested products safe for sensitive skin. Born from over a decade of longevity research, OneSkin's OS1 peptide is proven to target the visible signs of aging, helping you unlock your healthiest skin now and as you age. All of One Skin's products are designed to layer seamlessly or replace multiple steps in your routine, making skin health easier and smarter at every age. Editors have named One Skin a leader in skin longevity with recognition from Fast Company, Mind, bodygreen, Bloomberg and the Today Show. For a limited time, try one skin with 15% off using code legal AF@oneskin.com co/legalif that's 15% off oneskin co with code legalif after you purchase, they'll ask you where you heard about them. Please support our show and tell them we sent you again, that's 15% off at OneSkin co. Slash legal AF with code legal AF of course, Lutnick has another problem. He also lied to the American people when about six or seven months ago, he said that he had no contact with Jeffrey Epstein after 2005 when he met him because he bought the townhouse next door to Jeffrey Epstein, met him with his. With his wife, was so disgusted by him, he never wanted to be alone in the room with that man ever again. Except for the fact that about nine years later, he went to the island along with his another couple and their children to go have lunch with Jeff Jeffrey during a Christmas holiday on their. On his yacht and a lots of other contacts related to charity and charity donations and trying to stop some construction in the neighborhood at a museum that they had a mutual interest in and things like that that put a lie to what Lutnick said out loud. In fact, that came up during an Appropriations hearing meeting where he had a. Like basically with his wife sitting behind him. Who brings his wife to an Appropriations Committee meeting, Had to answer for how, why he didn't tell the truth about 2005. Is this administration and its leadership just genetically and from genetically and from a DNA standpoint, incapable of telling the truth? Play the clip. But, Nick, I think you understand the root of concern here. It's the way you described very emphatically your first encounter with him in his apartment, said you were disgusted, would never have any contact with him again. Did you, in fact, make the visit to Jeffrey Epstein's private island?
Podcast Host
I did have lunch with him as I was on a boat going across on a family vacation. My wife was with me, as were my four children and nannies. I had another couple with. They were there as well, with their children. And we had lunch on the island, that is true, for an hour. And we left with all of my children, with my nannies and my wife all together. We were on family vacation. We were not apart to suggest there was anything untoward about that in 2012. I don't, I don't recall why we did it.
Michael Popak
But Mr. Secretary, again, as I said there, so. So Democrats and even Republicans are calling for Howard Lutnick to go. Does he make it through the second year of the term? I'm not sure about that. There's been lots of rumblings. I mean, Trump has a habit of having attacks on his friends, and apparently Lutnick is his closest friend of the administration. Make him pull them closer. But then again, you know, the people like Lindsey Halligan are out of the administration. Alina Haba are. Is out, are out of the administration and the rest. I mean, there's a lot of fighting going on in this administration. First of all, it's a tremendously leaky, undisciplined administration. We're constantly getting information from insiders about problems, ethical conflicts, illegality within the Trump administration. And that's because people don't respect Donald Trump and they're starting to talk to reporters. You know, we just had the oddest thing ever. The number two in the Department of Justice, for instance, Todd Blanche is rumored to be the attorney general when Pam Bondi gets canned. And yet Howard Lutnick's best friend from growing up in high school, Peter Ticketon, went on a recent podcast that nobody watches and said that Todd Blanche is corrupt and should go. I mean, this pitting administration officials against each other in some sort of hunger games, you know, is Donald Trump's M.O. certainly doesn't make for good government or good governance or ethics in government. And we'll continue to follow it all right here. You're on the Midas Touch Network. And also if you know me, you know me from Legal AF, come over to Legal AF YouTube channel. Hit the free subscribe button. Help us continue to grow that community as well. Until my next report, I'm Michael. Can't get your fill of Legal af. Me neither. That's why we formed the Legal AF substack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a oral argument, come over to the substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there, including a daily roundup that I do called wait for it Morning af. What else? All the other contributors from Legal AF are there as well. We got some new reporting, we got interviews, we got ad free versions of the podcast and hot takes where Legal AF on substack. Come over now to free subscribe Lifelock. How can I help? The IRS said I filed my return, but I haven't. One in four tax paying Americans is paid the price of identity fraud. What do I do? My refund though.
Podcast Host
I'm freaking out.
Michael Popak
Don't worry, I can fix this. Lifelock fixes identity theft guaranteed and gets
Advertiser
your money back with up to $3 million in coverage.
Michael Popak
I'm so relieved.
Advertiser
No problem. I'll be with you every step of the way. One in four was a fraud paying American.
Michael Popak
Not anymore. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast terms apply.
Episode: Trump Blows Up at Top Official after Epstein Secrets Surface
Date: March 3, 2026
This episode dives deep into the mounting scandals surrounding Trump’s Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick. The hosts analyze multiple controversies: allegations of profiting from unconstitutional tariffs, Lutnick’s misleading statements about his ties with Jeffrey Epstein, and the resulting backlash within the Trump administration. The discussion connects these events to broader systemic issues of ethics, loyalty, and dysfunction at the highest levels of government.
Timestamp: [01:24]
“He’s also off Donald Trump according to reporting, who's not happy that there is a family profiting on the Trump brand that's not named Donald Trump or his family.”
—Michael Popok [01:53]
Timestamp: [03:00–06:11]
“At the same time, probably knowing that the United States Supreme Court was going to rip down those tariffs, Daddy Lutnick's company bet against the tariffs.”
—Michael Popok [02:32]
Timestamp: [04:42–06:11]
“We are the world's consumer… the customer is always right.”
—[05:29–06:26]
Timestamp: [06:35–09:30]
“A firm cannot simultaneously have never executed any transactions in this market and have already put through a trade. Which is it? The American people deserve to know whether the administration insiders and their closest family members deliberately position themselves to profit from these blatantly illegal tariffs while everybody else paid the price.”
—Citing Jamie Raskin’s letter [09:13]
Timestamp: [10:37–13:18]
“Did you, in fact, make the visit to Jeffrey Epstein's private island?”
—Committee Questioner
“I did have lunch with him as I was on a boat going across on a family vacation... We had lunch on the island, that is true, for an hour. And we left with all of my children, with my nannies and my wife all together. We were on family vacation. We were not apart to suggest there was anything untoward about that in 2012. I don't, I don't recall why we did it.”
—Howard Lutnick [12:41–13:18]
“Is this administration and its leadership just... incapable of telling the truth?” [12:30]
Timestamp: [13:18–15:00]
“...this pitting administration officials against each other in some sort of hunger games, you know, is Donald Trump's M.O. Certainly doesn't make for good government or good governance or ethics in government.”
—Michael Popok [14:03]
| Segment | Time | Description | |---------|------|-------------| | Introduction to Lutnick's scandal | 01:24 | Popok sets the scene of multiple scandals | | Trump’s anger at Lutnick’s profiteering | 01:53 | Details on Cantor Fitzgerald and Trump’s response | | Tariff betting breakdown | 03:00–06:11 | Financial arbitrage and Jamie Raskin’s investigation | | Lutnick’s media grandstanding | 04:42–06:26 | Clips and commentary on tariff rhetoric | | Congressional investigation, Wired exposé | 06:35–09:30 | Cantor Fitzgerald’s contradictory claims | | Lutnick’s Epstein lies exposed | 10:37–13:18 | Committee confrontation and Lutnick’s admission | | Fallout and speculation on Lutnick’s future | 13:18–15:00 | Political implications and White House dysfunction |
The analysis throughout is incisive, laden with legal and political skepticism, and unafraid to call out hypocrisy or deceit—reflecting the podcast’s signature “hard-hitting, thought-provoking” style.
For further details, interviews, and document links, check out the Legal AF YouTube channel and Substack as encouraged by the hosts.