Loading summary
A
Introducing Meta Ray Ban Display the world's most advanced AI glasses with a full color display built into the lens of the glasses. It's there when you need it and gone when you don't. Send and receive messages, translate or caption live conversations, collaborate with Meta, AI and more. Be one of the first to try Meta Ray ban display. Visit meta.com metaraybanddisplay to book a demo and find your pair.
B
Hablas Espanol spries du dzoich com de.
C
Nosk if you used Babbel, you would Babbel's conversation based techniques teaches you useful words and phrases to get you speaking quickly about the things you actually talk about in the real world. With lessons handcrafted by over 200 language experts and voiced by real native speakers, Babbel is like having a private tutor in your pocket. Start speaking with Babbel today. Get up to 55% off your Babbel subscription right now at Babbel.com Spotify spelled B A B-B-E-L.com Spotify rules and restrictions.
A
May apply I've litigated in state and federal courts across America for most of my career. Yet I found shocking what just happened to Lindsey Halligan at the arraignment of former FBI Director James Comey. She was completely outmatched. Not only that, she was dumbfounded and mute. She didn't say a word during the arraignment. In fact, people that were in the room. Court observers said that she spent the entirety of the arraignment rocking back and forth in her seat and nodding. It looks like she's practicing to get into the fetal position. I mean, if I was up against 6 foot 8 James Comey, former FBI director, former the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and his lawyer Pat Fitzgerald, former U.S. attorney in Chicago for the Northern District of Illinois, I'd be rocking myself for comfort back and forth as well. And she brought with her a couple of security blankets and two prosecutors that got the short straw. She couldn't get anyone to prosecute the case from her own office, the Eastern District of Virginia. They had to bring in two people, Mr. Lemons and his companion from North Carolina, to litigate in front of Judge Nakmanoff, a Biden appointee who set a you want to hear about rocket docket in Eastern District of Virginia? We're going to trial in less than three months in the Comey case. And that's all to James Comey's advantage. I'm glad you're here with me. Michael Popak on Midas touch and on legal af. Let's crack our knuckles and get into what happened. I'm all dressed up for this particular. Take that. And I had a court appearance appearance earlier this morning. So let's get into it. James Comey's arraigned. And if you're looking for footage of the perp walk that was threatened, you can stop looking. They didn't do the perp walk. First of all, they didn't really have an arrest warrant for him. He had a summons to appear. And a case like this, white collar. One count of perjury lied about something eight, nine, ten years ago. Nobody can figure it out from the indictment. That's a problem. I'll cover. That's a self surrender. You arrange with your lawyers and the FBI to like go in, surrender, we'll see you at the courthouse, released on your own recognizance, and we're done. So when you. I heard the threats of the perp walk and Cash Patel whining. What is it with this administration and whining? Whining about, oh, you simps over at MSNBC now, Whatever it's called, complaining about, you know, a perp walk, we have every right to do it. No, you don't. The Department of Justice manual says that you can't use publicity like that to abuse the rights of somebody who's presumed innocent. You don't do perp walks unless you have to, unless it serves a legitimate law enforcement purpose and not to embarrass somebody who's innocent until proven guilty. But it didn't happen because I have a theory. And one day, if I bump into Pat Fitzgerald, the lawyer for James Comey, I'm going to ask him. I think they called their bluff. I think they said, you want to do a perp walk? Just tell us where and when. We're going to have a video camera crew out in front of James Comey's house starting today, 24 hours until the arraignment. Because we want to get our own video and all the camera angles and we'll have our guy miked for the perp walk. You want to do with, quote, unquote, big beefy FBI agents and with try to embarrass our client. Cause we're gonna be using it for our motion practice, you know, our motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution. So bring it. And then that. Then we had Taco Tuesday, right? Trump always chickens out. Chickens out. No perp walk. And I'm sure Trump was told that there wasn't gonna Be one. He's so big right now. Donald Trump's so consumed with trying to win the Nobel priest prize as. As if it's something you can campaign for. I mean, they've got. I don. Another day. It's announced tomorrow. It's announced on the 10th. So they're campaigning left and right about Israel and Gaza and this and that. So he can't be bothered with what's going on anymore. James Comey, he's already lost interest with that plaything. Now fast forward. We get the judge assignment. Judge Nakmanoff, Eastern District of Virginia. Great. Judge Biden appointee, used to be a federal public defender. Okay. Knows the U.S. attorney's office well. Was probably already had had an arched eyebrow when no one from the Eastern district of Virginia prosecutor's office came into his courtroom. You know, this is where they ply their trade. Instead, couple of carpetbaggers from North Carolina show up. Hello, your honor. Mr. Lemons, I'm going to have to be sworn in here because I'm not already a member of the bar. Great start. Okay, half an hour arraignment. Nachmanoff pushed this pedal to the metal. Unless the defendant waives his right to speedy trial, which they were never going to do. This case goes to trial. When the judge says it's going to trial, it's going to trial. 1-5-20 case. You're wondering 2026, three months. That's advantage Comey and Fitzgerald, because the government has an obligation and they have very little time now, maybe less than a month to get together weeks. All of the exculpatory information and evidence, including those leaky memos that can help the defense. And so all that's gotta be turned over. Usually called something like Brady material named after a famous case. So all the memos we've been hearing about that have leaked out. Oh, the. John Durham was interviewed. Okay. John. John Durham was interviewed. The former special counsel for four years. He spent tens of millions of dollars going after everybody. He said, no, I didn't go after Comey because there's no perjury there. The perjury, again, to remind people that are joining this story late, is alleged that in 2020, September 5, 2020, while James Comey was testifying before the Senate. We think the indictment relates to a Q and A between Cruz, Senator Cruz and Comey about a statement that he made Comey made four, five years earlier in 2017 about a leak in 2016. You see the problem here at. At the Washington Post, which he swears he did not authorize and that his number two, Andy McCabe, the FBI director, says he did it. So let me play a clip, though, of what we think is the Cruz Comey exchange at the heart of the indictment. Play it.
C
Russian asset. All right, let's shift to another topic. On May 3, 2017, in this committee, Chairman Grassley asked you point blank, quote, have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation, of the Clinton investigation? You responded under oath, quote, never. He then asked you, quote, have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton administration? You responded again under oath, no. Now, as you know, Mr. McCabe, who works for you, has publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that you were directly aware of it and that you directly authorized it. Now, what Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to this committee cannot both be true. One or the other is false. Who's telling the truth?
A
I can only speak to my testimony. I stand by what the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017.
C
So your testimony is you've never authorized anyone to leak. And Mr. McCabe, when, if he says contrary, is not telling the truth, Is that correct?
A
Again, I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine is the same today.
C
All right, I'm going to make a final point because my time has expired. This investigation of the president was corrupt. The FBI and the Department of Justice were politicized and weaponized. And in my opinion, there are only two possibilities, that you were deliberately corrupt or woefully incompetent. And I don't believe you were incompetent. This has done severe damage to the professionals and the honorable men and women at the FBI because law enforcement should not be used as a political weapon. And that is the legacy you have left.
A
Now, Fitzgerald comes into court and says we can't make heads or tails of the indictment. As I said, it is woefully deficient on its face. We don't know who person one is. We don't know who person two is. We. We don't know who person three is. We're not even sure if that's the right clip of Cruise. What is it about fall that just opens up life? The weather's perfect for getting outside. The leaves are changing, and suddenly there are more moments to enjoy, festive gatherings, upcoming holidays, and just more time to hang with friends and family. Personally, I'm looking forward to cozy nights with good food and even better company. And with fall in full swing, more moments call for comfort you can count on. That's why I'm leaning on Mack Weldon this season. They've got all the essentials for fall comfortable, easy to layer clothes designed for cooler days and timeless style. Their new Ace line, inspired by their best selling sweatpants combines everyday comfort with long lasting confident looks. Hoodies, half zips, sweats, crew necks, you name it. I've been wearing their Ace collection all season I and I can honestly say it's a game changer. The fit is perfect. Comfortable but sharp like you actually tried even when you didn't. The materials feel amazing. Soft but durable and I love throwing on a hoodie or relaxed sweatpants to run errands or just chill at home. It gives you that effortless confidence. You look good without even thinking about it. It's different from anything else I've owned. Seriously. Classic, timeless and crazy comfortable, Mack Weldon balances classic pieces with updated details so you look sharp without being flashy. Everything is versatile and effortless by design. With the Ace line, ease and self assurance has never been more comfortable. They got sweatpants, shorts, sweatshirts, even blazers that feel like a sweatshirt, half zips, pullovers, bomber jackets, crew necks plus all new colors on their relaxed carpenter and classic sweatpants. The go to choice for guys who want to look great without even trying fall into comfort with Mack Weldon's Ace collection. Go to mackweldon.com and get 20% off your first order of $125 or more with promo code legal AF that's M A C K W E L D O N.com promo code legal A F and now we've got the new leak and all this information. John Durham saying he's not going to prosecute. The U.S. attorneys in D.C. prosecutors saying they looked at Comey for two for two whole months of investigation. There's nothing there on perjury that the memo that was written by the Courier prosecutors in the Eastern District saying we're not going to prosecute, we shouldn't prosecute, that it was handed to Lindsey Halligan. All that gets turned over to the defense. It's all going to form the basis of the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution, plain and simple. And the government's got to get all that stuff together in a short amount of time. Now we've got new reporting which will be to the benefit and strength in the hands of James Comey that the key witness that was evaluated, Daniel Richman, a law professor at Columbia who worked under James Comey at the Southern District of New York as a prosecutor, but now a law professor at Columbia and a special advisor, policy advisor to Comey. That the prosecutors evaluated him and thought that his testimony would prevent insurmountable hurdles to getting a perjury charge sustained against Comey. Just to remind you of who or for the first time, here's Professor Richmond several years ago on fox. Let's play the clip.
D
Professor Daniel Richmond, he's also a policy advisor to FBI Director James Comey. Great to see you, Professor. Thank you for being here.
B
Thank you. It's good to be here.
D
So you know Comey, you've known him for a long time, used to practice law together?
B
Yes.
D
Okay. And you say he's a straight shooter and you're a friend of his and an advisor of sorts. What do you make of the piling on now, Nancy Pelosi in particular? Like maybe he can't do the job. You know, maybe it's time for change.
B
What people seem to forget is that whatever he did would have political ramifications if you stay silent and don't correct what people seem to think, which was that an investigation was complete and, and you let that thought go to people as they, let's say, vote or maybe let's say as they move into the running the government next year or you speak and you speak as little as possible. I don't think he's unaware of the fact that there's an election going on. I don't think he's trying to influence election, but either silence or speaking is going to implicate the election and he's aware of that and did what he felt he had to do.
D
You is this hard on him, do you think? I mean, he's a human being. He seems like a real sort of Joe Friday kind of, you know, law enforcement official. But is this hard on him to have this much pile on, including today from the president? We don't deal in innuendo. We don't deal in leaks.
B
I think Jim is used to being piled on. That comes with the territory. I also, I don't read what the president said as part of the piling on, Frankly. I think what the president said is people thought the investigation was complete. It turns out the president was wrong on that. There is an investigation, investigation that was said to have been complete but is going on and that's all that the director said.
A
Okay. And Andy McCabe has already taken the blame for it. He's already said I'm the one nobody's talked to me, but I'm the one that talked to the Washington Post, not him. So how are they ever going to get this indictment to stick? There may be a superseding indictment where they try to fix some of these problems off this hearing, but they're not going to be able to grow a brain or ethics. In the meantime, we're watching prosecutorial abuse writ large on national television and we'll follow it all for you with all the updates. The next thing that's out of the box and follow me on Legal AF YouTube channel or Legal AF substack and you'll get the reporting. The next thing out of the box is going to be the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution. It's coming. It could be any minute now. It's in the coming days. They're not going to wait around on this. They're going to clear Comey's name. They're going to draw a line in the sand. They're going to file that motion to dismiss for a vindictive prosecution and sometime in later October or beginning of November, we're going to have a hearing on that. This case may never get to trial in January. I'm sure that's what Judge Nachmanoff knew when he set a very fast trial. I'm continuing to follow it all here on Midas Dutch and Legal af. Take a moment, hit the subscribe button here, click Come over to Legal AF the YouTube channel. Do the exact same thing there and join us on Legal AF Substack where when I get the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution, I will post it there for you to read it. So until my next report, I'm Michael Popak. Can't get your fill of Legal af. Me neither. That's why we formed the Legal AF substack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a oral argument, come over to the substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there, including a daily roundup that I do called Wait for It Morning af. Af. What else? All the other contributors from Legal AF are there as well. We got some new reporting. We got interviews, we got ad free versions of the podcast and hot takes where Legal AF on Substack. Come over now to free subscribe.
Date: October 13, 2025
Host: Michael Popok (MeidasTouch Network)
Episode Focus: Dissecting the disastrous DOJ-led arraignment of former FBI Director James Comey, the dubious perjury charges, prosecutorial missteps, and the political/legal implications at play.
This episode centers around the high-profile arraignment of former FBI Director James Comey on a contested perjury charge, widely seen as an act of "vindictive prosecution" by a Trump-influenced DOJ. Host Michael Popok offers a blow-by-blow account of the courtroom drama, the evident weaknesses in the government's case, and the looming motion to dismiss. He also places these events in the broader context of ongoing political weaponization of law enforcement.
Lindsey Halligan, the DOJ lawyer, appeared completely unprepared and overwhelmed, described as "dumbfounded and mute," failing to even speak during the hearing (01:00).
"She spent the entirety of the arraignment rocking back and forth in her seat and nodding. It looks like she's practicing to get into the fetal position."
— Michael Popok [01:08]
No perp walk for Comey, despite political pressure and public threats. Instead, a routine self-surrender was arranged. Popok theorizes that Comey's team called the DOJ's bluff:
“You want to do a perp walk? Just tell us where and when... We're gonna have a video camera crew out in front of James Comey's house... we'll have our guy miked for the perp walk.”
— Popok [02:58]
Judge Nachmanoff (EDVA, Biden appointee) set an extremely rapid trial schedule, giving the DOJ only three months, a move that strongly benefits Comey.
"You want to hear about a rocket docket in Eastern District of Virginia? We're going to trial in less than three months in the Comey case. And that's all to James Comey's advantage.”
— Popok [01:38]
"As I said, it is woefully deficient on its face. We don't know who person one is. We don't know who person two is. ...We're not even sure if that's the right clip of Cruz."
— Popok [09:56]
[07:58-09:56]
Cruz presses Comey: “...Now, what Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to this committee cannot both be true... Who's telling the truth?”
Comey stands firm: “I can only speak to my testimony. I stand by what the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017.”
Cruz, in classic adversarial style, concludes:
"There are only two possibilities, that you were deliberately corrupt or woefully incompetent. And I don't believe you were incompetent. ...That is the legacy you have left."
— Ted Cruz [09:17]
Unorthodox Prosecution Team: No one from the Eastern District of Virginia wanted this case; the DOJ had to bring in prosecutors "carpetbaggers from North Carolina."
"She couldn't get anyone to prosecute the case from her own office, the Eastern District of Virginia."
— Popok [01:18]
Material Favoring the Defense: The judge’s fast timeline forces the government to turn over all possibly exculpatory material ("Brady" evidence) within weeks.
Star Witness Problems:
Daniel Richman (Columbia Law, ex-prosecutor, long-time Comey associate) was evaluated as unhelpful to the prosecution.
“That the prosecutors evaluated him and thought that his testimony would prevent insurmountable hurdles to getting a perjury charge sustained against Comey.”
— Popok [12:29]
Motion to Dismiss for Vindictive Prosecution:
Popok predicts an imminent filing:
“The next thing out of the box is going to be the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution. It’s coming. It could be any minute now... They're going to clear Comey's name. They're going to draw a line in the sand.”
— Popok [15:20]
Impact of Judge’s Timeline:
With a January trial date, the defense is poised to overwhelm the shaky prosecution before trial begins—a calculated move by Judge Nachmanoff.
On Lindsey Halligan’s Performance:
"She spent the entirety of the arraignment rocking back and forth in her seat and nodding. It looks like she's practicing to get into the fetal position."
— Michael Popok [01:08]
On the Perp Walk Bluff:
"You want to do a perp walk? Just tell us where and when... We'll have our guy miked for the perp walk."
— Michael Popok [02:58]
On DOJ’s Case Weakness:
“Fitzgerald comes into court and says we can't make heads or tails of the indictment... We’re not even sure if that’s the right clip of Cruz.”
— Michael Popok [09:56]
On John Durham’s Prior Investigation:
“He said, no, I didn’t go after Comey because there’s no perjury there.”
— Michael Popok [06:33]
Sen. Ted Cruz’s Confrontation:
"There are only two possibilities, that you were deliberately corrupt or woefully incompetent. And I don’t believe you were incompetent. ...That is the legacy you have left."
— Ted Cruz [09:17]
The episode paints a vivid picture of a politically motivated, competence-challenged prosecution quickly unraveling under legal and factual scrutiny. The hosts expect a decisive defense victory before the case ever reaches trial, highlighting both the continuing risks of politicizing the DOJ and the resilience of adversarial process.
For more analysis and the upcoming motion to dismiss, Popok points listeners to the Legal AF Substack and YouTube channel.